Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

NY Times Hypes McCain Credentials

By Jeffrey Klein, AlterNet. Posted June 19, 2008.


Looks like McCain's national security adviser is inventing history.
Advertisement

"At a meeting in his Pentagon office in early 1981, Secretary of the Navy John F. Lehman told Capt. John S. McCain III that he was about to attain his life ambition: becoming an admiral ... Mr. McCain declined the prospect of his first admiral's star to make a run for Congress, saying that he could 'do more good there,' Mr. Lehman recalled." So claimed the New York Times in a front-page article on May 29 this year.

This story is highly improbable for several reasons, not least of all because John McCain himself has always told a very different story about his stalled naval career. For example, on page 9 of his memoir Worth The Fighting For, McCain writes:

Several months before my father died, I informed him that I was leaving the navy. I am sure he had gotten word of my decision from friends in the Pentagon. I had been summoned to see the CNO, Admiral Heyward, who told me I was making a mistake ... His attempt to dissuade me encouraged me to believe that I might have made admiral had I remained in the navy, a prospect that remained an open question in my mind ... Some of my navy friends believed I could earn my star; others doubted it ... When I told my father of my intention, he did not remonstrate me ... But I knew him well enough to know that he was disappointed. For when I left him that day, alone in his study, I took with me his hope that I might someday become the first son and grandson of four-star admirals to achieve the same distinction. That aspiration was well beyond my reach by the time I made my decision ...

McCain's father died on March 22, 1981. McCain retired from the Navy within a week. He wrote about his retirement soon thereafter. McCain never mentioned the alleged offer of an admiralship by Lehman in any of his books, nor in the numerous interviews he gave during his first run for the presidency in 1999-2000.

Furthermore, articles written during the current presidential campaign quote McCain's closest friends about McCain's failure to be promoted to admiral before he retired from the Navy. For example, in an April 26, 2008, National Journal cover story, William Cohen (then a senator, subsequently secretary of defense and the best man at McCain's second wedding) recounts that McCain "knew his career in the Navy was limited." Former Sen. Gary Hart, who served as a groomsman at McCain's 1980 wedding, says in the National Journal story that he had been told "that [McCain] was not going to receive a star and not going to become an admiral. I think that was the deciding point for him to retire from the Navy."

John Lehman doesn't figure in any accounts of McCain's naval career, probably because Lehman was appointed secretary of the Navy less than two months before McCain retired. The New York Times didn't note this, or the pertinent fact that John Lehman is currently serving as National Security Adviser to McCain's 2008 presidential campaign. Two admirals in the Times story confirmed Lehman's claim, but for unknown reasons the Times, in violation of its own guidelines, accorded them off-the-record status that makes it impossible to assess their motives and credibility.

The New York Times' front-page story about McCain declining promotion to admiral lacks credibility for other reasons as well. For example, McCain had been promoted to captain on August 1, 1979, so he wouldn't have been due for another promotion by March of 1981.

Retired Adm. Peter Booth, who was promoted to rear admiral in 1981, flatly disputes Lehman's claim about McCain. "No, John McCain was not selected for flag rank, for admiral. With all due respect, I think I was selected that same year, and I have never heard anything even remotely like that. To begin with, John Lehman did not select Navy flag officers. That was done with a very august selection board headed by a four-star admiral. The secretary of the Navy does not appoint. He is in the approval chain, but he is not on the committee.

"I have never heard a story, even remotely, that John McCain was going to be a flag officer. I was early selected for captain, in 1976, and I was regular selected for admiral in 1981. So it's probably five or six years, I guess. I've never heard of anybody being selected for flag rank within three or four years of making captain, ever."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: admiral, navy, mccain

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is news?????
Posted by: gellero1 on Jun 19, 2008 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So you're saying secty. Lehman is lying?? Perhaps the author should be a good 'reporter' and ask Mr. Lehman exactly what he meant and why.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The NY Times is not a newspaper
Posted by: weathered on Jun 19, 2008 3:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's a PR firm and Israel is its biggest customer.

The 4th estate had a fire sale. Pull the plug on all MSM and flourish or stay stuck in the Lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain and Bush have a Serious Daddy Complex...!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jun 19, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain was in no manner Admiral material he was a major screw up, pig headed irresponsible and it's not well known that many who served on the USS Forrestal as an old friend of mine did still fault him for screwing around and causing the explosions that killed hundreds of American Seamen and almost sank an American Aircraft carrier...

He then excelled in getting shot down without having in any way a distinguished record of successful kills and or bombing runs..

He was heroic in his refusing early release due to his father being head of Pacific Operations and in reality the man who ran the Vietnam War..which is why McCain still rails on about the U.S. losing in Vietnam but you never lose by leaving a war you never should have become involved in..such as Iraq and Vietnam...

Interesting that two rich privileged jerks who grew up during the Vietnam era created another in Iraq, while those middle class kids who predominantly fought it were against stupid Wars like Iraq..

Both McCain and Bush have a SERIOUS DADDY COMPLEX...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain: From the school of hard nogggens?
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jun 19, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the quote in the memoir: “Admiral Hayward, who told me I was making a mistake ... His attempt to dissuade me encouraged me to believe that I might have made admiral had I remained in the navy"
This sounds like a classis Romeo Juliet miscommunication where one guy can't say too much to the other without spilling the nasty beans. And, bad things happen as a result. In Romeo's case, it was double fatal. It seems to me that Hayward was trying to hint to Captain McCain that if he would only wait a little bit, the boys behind the screen would take him out of the captain's perch and put him in the admiral's seat. Bada bing, bada bing, bada boom. But, alas, the subtle message couldn't sink into the young fella's thick noggen. And he quit the navy.
I hate to say it. But I don't think George W would have screwed this one up the way McCain apparantly did.
So, my question is this: Why is the corporate class trying so hard to make this dim-wit the President of the United States when he's got mush between the ears, and we really need someone with a brain at the helm?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prisoner McCain
Posted by: Democritus on Jun 19, 2008 1:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author did not mention that, according to McCain himself, he "broke" under the pressure of the North Vietnamese interrogation, and signed a statement to the effect that he was an "air pirate."

Of course, many men break under pressure, although the true heroes do not. McCain was no hero. The fact that, as the author states, McCain was actually treated better than his fellow POWs shows that his courage under pressure was no better than his flying skills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT CREDENTIALS?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 19, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finished 5th from the bottom of his class at Anapolis, lousy husband, mediocre career, lousy senate voting record, votes against every attempt to make life better for veterans and is a war monger. He did however marry well and his father and grandfather were both 4 star Admirals in the Navy. He runs with the right crownd. Sound familiar. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT CREDENTIALS? Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: WHAT CREDENTIALS? Posted by: desidid