Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

New Battleground States for Obama and McCain

By Linda Feldmann, Christian Science Monitor. Posted June 10, 2008.


Obama sees potential in traditional red states such as Virginia and North Carolina. McCain looks to target blue states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Washington -- As the 2008 general election campaign kicks off, both major candidates are surveying the smorgasbord of states before them and see a table groaning with possibilities.

Both Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain see openings in states won by the opposing party in recent cycles. For Senator Obama of Illinois, demographic changes have made red states such as Virginia, Colorado, and North Carolina competitive. For Senator McCain of Arizona, Obama's poor primary showing among some traditional Democratic constituencies in crucial blue states such as Pennsylvania and Michigan has created an opening.

One need look no further than the two presumptive nominees' schedules to see the strategies in operation. This week, Obama is in Missouri, Iowa, and Wisconsin -- only the last of which was won (barely) by Democratic nominee John Kerry four years ago. Last week, Obama launched his general election campaign in Virginia, a state that President Bush won four years ago by 9 points, and which both 2008 campaigns now consider competitive -- the most dramatic entry into the ranks of battleground states.

McCain's presence Wednesday in Philadelphia, where he will hold a town-hall meeting, signals his intention to poach a blue state rich with Reagan Democrats -- and a critical 21 electoral votes of the 270 needed to win the presidency.

"It is an absolute must-win state for Obama; if he loses it, I think it's almost impossible for him to win the election, because he's also likely losing Ohio and Florida," says Terry Madonna, a pollster at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster, Pa.

McCain is competitive in Pennsylvania, Mr. Madonna says, "because he is able to attract independents."

But for now, analysts say, the overall electoral map tilts toward Obama. The floundering economy, the Iraq war, and an unpopular Republican president all work against McCain, and if Obama can secure the states that Senator Kerry won in 2004, that's already 252 electoral votes -- with just 18 to go for the presidency. Ohio alone (20 electoral votes) gets him there. So does a combination of Iowa (7), Colorado (9), and Nevada (5) or New Mexico (5), all states considered ripe for the picking by Obama.

The Obama campaign, flush with cash and fresh off a highly competitive nomination race that required organization building in every state, is promising a 50-state effort in the general election.

"Today, I am proud to announce that our presidential campaign will be the first in a generation to deploy and maintain staff in every single state," Obama's deputy national campaign director, Steve Hildebrand, announced Monday in an e-mail to supporters.

All campaigns, of course, say they are competing everywhere; there's no point in discouraging core voters in safe states, and making those electoral votes less than automatic -- or missing opportunities in the opposition's seemingly safe states. But this time around, with the environment weighing so heavily in the Democrats' favor, a 50-state strategy may seem a bit less pie in the sky.

Republicans have lost three normally safe congressional seats this year in special elections, and signs point to another "wave" election, following the wave of 2006, when the Democrats swept the Republicans out of the leadership in both the House and the Senate.

Even though McCain is competitive with Obama so far in national polls, he faces a generic Republican vs. Democrat environment that favors the Democrats by a double-digit margin.

Also in Obama's back pocket is a large pool of unregistered black voters in states he hopes to make competitive. As of 2004, according to Census numbers, Georgia alone had 500,000 African-Americans who were not registered to vote. The Obama campaign is aggressively courting those voters with the prospect of electing the nation's first black president -- and thus many political handicappers put Georgia in the "lean McCain" column, not in his base.

North Carolina, Mississippi, and Louisiana are also in same boat, with large untapped populations of black voters that could make those states competitive. Even if Obama does not win there, he could force the less-well-funded McCain to divert resources to them.

David Bositis, an expert on the black vote at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in Washington, notes that the states with the biggest black populations are also the most racially polarized.

"Senator Obama is not going to win these states just with black voters," he says. "He has to have some prospect of doing reasonably well with white voters."

Mississippi may be beyond reach, but states like North Carolina and Georgia, with influxes of upper-income, young, and educated white voters could become competitive with a large-enough black turnout.

"If they [the Obama campaign] can turn out enough new voters and combine them with progressive whites and even bring back some Reagan Democrats, they can be competitive," says Kerry Haynie, a political scientist at Duke University in Durham, N.C. "The economy is in the tank, and it gives them an opening."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, election08, mccain, general election

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
But . . .
Posted by: Scientz on Jun 10, 2008 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . do any of you think America will really elect a Muslim?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But . . . Posted by: entdev
» RE: But . . . Posted by: akdave
» Thank you, fanny666! Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Attention all, this was sarcasm! Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: But . . . Posted by: CatDad
bradley Affect anyone
Posted by: JibreelRiley on Jun 10, 2008 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know its bad news however it will happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'll take your 50 states and raise you 10
Posted by: jwhitneywise on Jun 10, 2008 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the South will finally pull its head out and stop voting to keep themselves in Poverty! I applaud the 50 state strategy and hope Obama takes all of them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cutting The Margins
Posted by: mishawaka on Jun 10, 2008 9:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned tonight that our area of Indiana will get at least one Obama organizer. Amazing for an area that just four years ago had NO Kerry/Edwards signs. The only ones we got we either "borrowed" from a Michigan headquarters across the border or sent here by good samaritans who paid for them out of their own pockets.

After working on two congressional campaigns I became versed in the art of cutting the margins. Although it is always better to win, sometimes it is enough to limit your losses. In my district we have twelve counties. Two or three in the north are relatively moderate, but the other nine or ten are relatively conservative. To win the seat, we had to kick ass in the two or three most populous, moderate counties while limiting our losses in the other nine or ten, less populous conservative counties. We could not have won if we ignored even one of those counties.

To me this is the essence of the upcoming Obama campaign. Instead of the defeatist "swing state strategy", he is going to run a fifty state strategy that will challenge the tired "red state/blue state" paradigm and make McCain keep up in every state.

I saw a Powerpoint presentation a few years ago that showed how, in 2004, John Kerry could have won if he had collected just one more vote per precinct. With the level of energy and enthusiasm surrounding the Obama campaign this year, and a plan to include all fifty states, I feel very good about our chances.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another look at Obama
Posted by: xvictor on Jun 11, 2008 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His speeches contain lots of bribes for voters: increase welfare, raise taxes against the wealthy, more rebate checks, reward stupidity by getting government to bail out homeowners in danger of being foreclosed. He and his Hillary-clone, Michelle, disses Corporate America. But Corporate America pays a substantial portion of taxes. What gratitude? Recently, he received 14 standing ovations at a Zionist conference and dead set on threatening Iran.

So is this the best Obama has to offer? Is this really "change"? How really different is Obama from McCain. I dunno. We don't have good choices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another look at Obama Posted by: jmp3954
Corporate Taxes are a Tiny Percentage of Total Federal Tax Revenues
Posted by: Paul1939 on Jun 11, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
xvictor says in part that, "Corporate America pays a substantial portion of taxes." Having read many times how small the corporate tax burden is compared to what it has paid in the past 50 years. A google search reveled the following information.

Based on a article by Joel Friedman on WebSite Center on Budget Policy and Priorities, "the corporate share of total federal taxes reached a peak of 32% in 1952 and by 2003 had declined to 7%. This decline was fairly steady, with corporate tax receipts equaling an average 21 percent of federal revenues in the 1960s, 15 percent in the 1970s, and less than 10 percent in the 1980s. After a brief rebound in the 1990s, when their share rose to nearly 12 percent in the middle of the decade, corporate receipts have now fallen to a percentage of federal tax collections not seen since the early 1980s. In contrast, payroll taxes represented about 10 percent of all federal tax receipts in 1952, but 40 percent in 2003.

Corporate income tax revenues have declined not only in terms of the share of federal taxes that they comprise, but also when they are measured as a share of the economy. Corporate revenues averaged nearly 5 percent of GDP in the 1950s and 4 percent in the 1960s, but then fell sharply to nearly 1 percent of GDP in 1983, reflecting the combination of tax cuts and economic conditions. After rising slightly above 2 percent of GDP during part of the 1990s, corporate receipts fell again after 2000, when the economy slowed. In 2003, actual corporate revenues dropped to 1.2 percent of GDP, the lowest level since 1937, except for 1983."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vietnamese captors nicknamed him 'Songbird McCain'
Posted by: securacom-wtc on Jun 11, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
articles/february2008/
020708_never_tortured.htm
A former Vietnam veteran with top secret clearance says he has personally spoken to numerous POW's who dispute John McCain's claim that he refused to provide information after he was captured and tortured in Hanoi, saying that in fact McCain's code-name was "Songbird" because of his willingness to tell all to avoid torture.

The group Vietnam Veterans Against McCain attacks Senator John McCain's heroism as a POW in the Vietnam conflict; this is making some waves in the news due to McCain's presidential candidacy. The documentary "Missing, Presumed Dead the Search for America's POWs" however focuses more on Senator John McCain successfully blocking the release of classified POW/MIA documents.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFM1xqqTX_g

USA’s Constitution and currency are being destroyed from within. How? Videos free on www.video.google.com 1) America: Freedom to Fascism, 2 hrs; 2)911 Justice, 18min; 3) The Clinton Chronicles, 1.7 hrs; 4) Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, 2 hrs, 5) Terrorstorm: A History of False Flag Terror, 2 hrs 6) 911 Mysteries, 2 hrs; 7)The Creature from Jekyll Island, 1hr; 8)Orwell Rolls in His Grave, 2hrs; 9) The War on Democracy, 1.5 hrs; 10) The Energy Non-Crisis, 1 hr; 11)Iraq for Sale 1.2 hr; 12) Zeitgeist, 2 hrs; 13)Ring of Power, 2.5 hrs; 14)Bush link to JFK, 1.5 hrs; 15) The Century of the Self, 4 hrs; 16) Loose Change (2nd ed & Final cut) 2hrs each; 17)John Pilger: The New Rulers of the World; 18) The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America, 3.5 hrs 19) Barack Obama CFR info 20) Global Warming or Global Governance 21) The Great Global Warming Swindle 22) Mercury, Autism and The Global Vaccine Agenda 23) The CIA, Mind Control and Satanism 24)George Hunt: UN UNCED Earth Summit 1992 (Population Reduction) 25) End of NAtions - EU Takeover 26) Washington, You're Fired 27) Blackwater: America's Private Army 28) Esoteric Agenda 29) Fiat Empire: Why the Federal Reserve Violates the U.S. COnstitution 30) The Revolution Will not be Televised [USA overthrow of Hugo Chavez] 31) One Nation Under Siege 32)Breaking The Silence - Truth and Lies in the War on Terror, by John Pilger(and all his documentaries) 33)Beyond Treason 1.5hrs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]