Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted May 7, 2008.


Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Barack Obama's triumph on Tuesday night was a victory over a wall that pretends to be a fly on the wall.

For a long time, the nation's body politic has been shoved up against that wall -- known as the news media.

Despite all its cracks and gaps, what cements the wall is mostly a series of repetition compulsion disorders. Whether the media perseveration is on Pastor Wright, the words "bitter" and "cling," or an absent flag lapel-pin, the wall's surfaces are more rigid when they're less relevant to common human needs and shared dreams.

"We've already seen it," Obama said during his victory speech in North Carolina, "the same names and labels they always pin on everyone who doesn't agree with all their ideas, the same efforts to distract us from the issues that affect our lives, by pouncing on every gaffe and association and fake controversy, in the hopes that the media will play along."

And how, they've played along. From the front pages of "quality" dailies to the reportage of NPR's drive-time news to the blather-driven handicapping on cable television, the ways that media structures have functioned in recent weeks tell us -- yet again -- how fleeting any media attention to substance can be.

News outlets spun out -- "pouncing on every gaffe and association and fake controversy" -- as media Obama-mania about a longshot candidate morphed into Obama-phobia toward the candidate most likely to become the Democratic presidential nominee. The man who could do little wrong became a man who could do little right. The lines of attack were spurious and protracted enough to be jaw-dropping.

But how often can we be truly shocked by such media patterns? Perennial corporate structures are reinforcing the narrow boundaries.

If this sounds like an old complaint, it is. Institutional dynamics -- fueled and steered by ownership, advertising, underwriting and undue government influence -- repeat themselves with endless permutations. Dominant media routinely focus on counterfeit issues, often ignoring or trashing progressive options in the process.

From George McGovern to Gary Hart to Michael Dukakis to Al Gore to Howard Dean to John Kerry, a long line of Democratic contenders with a chance to become president have been whipsawed by cartoonish images or bogus "issues," incubated by the right wing and fully hatched by the mass media. The slightest progressive wrinkles of even the starchiest corporate Democrats have been ironed out by media steamrollers.

In recent months, as Barack Obama went from underdog to frontrunner, the news media became stainless-steel accessories to the "kitchen sink" politics of smear and fear.

The media pretense of being a fly on the wall has often been preposterous. In the real world of politics -- where power brokers and manipulators proceed with the cynical axiom that perception is reality -- the fly on the wall is the wall. The political press corps is not observing reality as much as redefining it while obstructing outlooks and constraining public perceptions.

Yet, in North Carolina and Indiana, voters had more votes than all the pundits did. Pundits lost. Voters came out ahead. So did Obama. And so did the body politic.

We're still up against the media wall. But when dawn broke on Wednesday, that wall wasn't quite as high or mighty. And the nation might be able to see a little more clearly beyond it.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, news, obama, election 2008

Norman Solomon is an elected Obama delegate to the Democratic National Convention. His books include "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." A documentary film of the same name, based on the book, was released this spring via home-video outlets including Netflix. For further information, go to: www.normansolomon.com

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you, Hillary
Posted by: Crazy H on May 7, 2008 3:07 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for digging up all the dirt prior to October, for beating the people over the head with it until they're sick of it, for leaving McCanned with nothing left to fight with except the facts.

In spite of all the vilification and dirty tricks, it seems like you're on our side after all.

Thank you,
Crazy H and 160,000 of my closest friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is good to be alive.....
Posted by: foreverhope on May 7, 2008 3:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....to witness this day. I am so happy, it is exciting, especially for the young people, perhaps enjoying their first election ever, able to appreciate a fine candidate like Barack and the evolution of the democratic party, bringing new hope to older voters like myself that had just about given up. Really a revolution in how politics in general is conducted in this country as well as the way elections are covered by the media.

We need a president, ESPECIALLY at this time in our history, with precisely the leadership abilities of Barack Obama. It is terrific and exciting to be a part of this, much is changing and it is for the better. I feel sort of sorry for those that just can't appreciate it or can't even understand it or be happy for it.

BARACK THE VOTE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is good to be alive..... Posted by: foreverhope
Does this sarcastic gratitude. . .
Posted by: redceres on May 8, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . mean that the Obama-washed will stop bitching about the fact that Democratic candidates are actually (gasp!) forced to spend their valuable time talking to people in places that the urban-lef-elites disdain, such as West Virginia and Kentucky?

It chaps my ass that I'm going to be forced to vote for one or the other of these TWO bought-and-paid-for corporate shills--I, for one, and totally thrilled that they have to leave the Fortune Club and go back in the hollers a bit.

The only thing that keeps me psyched about the election at ALL is that, maybe, accidentally, some REAL progressives might go along for the ride and reconnect with the ordinary working class people who Hillary, Barack, and their love-feasters disdain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And by the way. . .
Posted by: redceres on May 8, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd be a lot more grateful for Saint Barack's Media Miracle if he actually did ANY work whatsoever to wrestle our media out of the hands of his corporate buddies.

But that will never happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And by the way. . .
Posted by: redceres on May 8, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd be a lot more grateful for Saint Barack's Media Miracle if he had/would actually done ANYTHING to wrestle the control of our media out of the greedy grasp of his corporate-elite buddies.

But that will never happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outstanding. The "fluff" of Obama's pastor doesn't merit the attention.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 8, 2008 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pastor's are supposed to berate their congregation/flocks/indoctrinated masses on the "evils of society". Wright is no different from any other charlatan or self-appointed "bringer of the true message". You can similarly watch any Westbrook gathering, and here their version of "what's wrong with America". But c'mon? Are they really a preznidential issue?

The undue attention on this common superstitionalist was indeed ridiculous, and kudos to Solomon for pointing out the "fluffies" that masquerade as national policy issues.

I mean, I don't blame Wright for pursuing his 15 minutes. That's what clergy do, in the name of their causes, when they see an opportunity to benefit those personal goals. But why all the attention on a common snake-handler?

Solomon gets it Wright. Fluff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

renarich
Posted by: renarich on May 11, 2008 10:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Norman Soloman has called the media on its b.s. for decades. We are lucky to have him. I know most of the gibberish is crap and most of these readers know it is crap. Tell your friends & neighbors & relatives (if you are still on speaking terms) that they need to wake up and follow the money (the class interest) ie- who gains and who is hurt by the daily crap-feed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Demise of the NEWS
Posted by: RobNLA on May 12, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NEWS (television and cable news) has become more about entertainment and less about actual news. It has adopted a tabloid approach to journalism...looking for the outrageous stories and lacking those...manufacturing them.

More and voters voters are researching news items on the internet instead of relying only upon prepackaged biased sound bites from mainstream news sources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watch Them Talk
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 13, 2008 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch the candidates, especially in interviews. To me Obama comes off as cerebral, reasonable and likeable. Clinton comes off as narcissistic, shrill and desperate, riding on her husband's coattails and trying to be whatever the consultants tell her she needs to be for the week. And McCain comes off as affable, dim-witted and totally lacking in substance, resting on his war-hero laurels.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Hillary
Posted by: venkat on May 14, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton takes Indiana by a ‘razor’ and Obama wins North Carolina by a huge margin. Nevertheless, Kentucky, Montana and West Virginia are still to come.

The Democratic race for nomination is still very much alive – and most likely to be decided by superdelegates

If you’re tired of waiting around for those super delegates to make a decision already, go to LobbyDelegates.com and push them to support Clinton or Obama

If you haven't done so yet, please write a message to each of your state's superdelegates at http://www.lobbydelegates.com

Obama Supporters:

Sending a note to current Obama supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Clinton supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Obama, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Obama. It's that easy...

Clinton Supporters too …. !

It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Clinton in office?! Those are really worth !

Sending a note to current Clinton supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Obama supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Clinton, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Clinton. It's that easy...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For shame Solomon. For shame....
Posted by: powerofbelief on May 20, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are wrong solomon. Today is not a triumph for the progressive community, but rather the media. You have participated in the same tit-for-tat journalism they have. Only you are cheerleading for the winning team.

The media loves Obama, as does most of corporate America. Who are you trying to fool?

And who exactly wins from Obama's presidential nomination? Take off your tinted glasses and you will realize corporate America heavily invested in Obama's nomination months ago.

What happened to you Solomon? Did you become tired of separating yourself from the media's games? Could you not resist the temptation of Obamania?

Or did the great Dalai Obama proclaim you as his disciple?

Please. Read this quote:

"Every president of the last half century has promoted war.... To the extent we give them (politicians and media) our trust, we are only setting ourselves up to be lied to again and again."

Sound familiar? those are your words. I can only hope when/if Obama becomes president you live by them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The author couldn't have gotten it more wrong ...
Posted by: johnshadows on May 26, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... The Democrats have made their choice based on charisma over substance. From a wide field of candidates, they have chosen the least experienced because he's for 'hope and change', dude. Like, cool. Barack Obama is great at giving speeches but he's not so good at answering questions. Go back and look at the last debate (no wonder he didn't want anymore?), and look at the [i]substantive[/i] question on capital gains taxes. He didn't know the answer, so he made one up, and the one he picked just re-confirmed the stereotype of Dems as mindless tax-raisers (the right answer is - cutting capital gains rates favors speculation over investment. Obama said that he would raise taxes as a 'matter of fairness'. Is he advocating [i]punitive taxation[/i]? Not to balance the budget, or build wind-farms, but to just punish the wealthy?) On foreign policy and the economy, once you get past the generalities, he sounds like he needs some serious tutoring. He's naive, and the media has [i]enabled[/i] him by carrying him on their shoulders for months.

Meanwhile, the media has been hammering the wicked witch of Gotham, despite the fact that she's more knowledgeable about policy, and has stood up, in the past and now, for democratic principles like achieving universal health care coverage. The author is, like many of the rest in the Democratic party, 'hooked on a feelin' about Obama. 'The audacity of hope' is not what I'd call substance. Well, I got some news for you - once the campaign starts, he's going to have to answer specific questions. And that champagne of hope-and-change might start tasting like kool-aid real quick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement