Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

No Country for Old Men

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted April 30, 2008.


McCain's age matters; especially if he picks his running mate from the crazy wing of the Republican Party.
Advertisement

Would President John McCain forget who made that 3 a.m. call to the special White House phone? I suspect that his aides would not just let him nod off back to sleep, even if they were intimidated by the prospect of one of his alleged intemperate outbursts, but might our septuagenarian president be less than fully focused?

Most likely he would be, although as someone born in the same year as the senator, I too bristle at suggestions that age has made me less perfect than I once was. But it has. Sadly, those brain cells do go, and "senior moments" of befuddlement are more than a joke. But that shouldn't automatically disqualify one of us still-agile silver foxes from the White House, as few of my contemporaries are likely to turn in a worse performance than the much younger current occupant. However, looking at the top two men in the present administration, the age question does make a compelling case for very carefully evaluating McCain's vice-presidential choice.

That was my point when I raised the age issue on a Los Angeles Times Book Festival panel last Sunday, and my sparring partner, right-wing radio pundit Hugh Hewitt, wanted me instantly voted off the island of constant noise. He compared my "ageist" comment to someone making a racist charge against Barack Obama.

I take his point, as absurd as it first appeared. Absurd because it is obviously true that aging, as opposed to skin color or gender, does have a deleterious effect on one's physical and mental functioning, and to deny this evident biological reality is as nonsensical as denying evolution itself. The species survives when each generation burns out and is replaced by a hopefully superior one, and while it is natural to want to linger on the scene as long as possible, we cannot insist on our personal indispensability to the continuation of the human experience.

Of course Hewitt was not doing anything of the sort, any more than he would genuinely embrace creationism, summarily dismiss fears of global warming or otherwise honestly endorse the tenet of the sort of phony science that right-wing pundits must from time to time condone. They do so for opportunistic reasons, and that is why the significance of McCain's age must be denied by those eager to maintain the GOP's hold on the presidency. They will hold their noses and vote for him despite the sensible positions he has at times had the temerity to advance, impervious to their blackmail. Impervious, that is, until he decided to make a second run for the presidency, leading him to sharply reverse his past principled stances and accommodate torture, tax cuts for the rich, Pat Robertson and other favored fetishes of the Republican base. The right-wing talk show bully boys still don't trust him, but he's the only horse left to ride.

While they continue to loathe him for his fatal flaw of occasionally embracing a moderate thought, they are dependent upon his electoral victory to extend their vastly disproportionate political power. They fully expect McCain to betray key points of their cryogenic agenda; on Sunday, Hewitt condemned most of McCain's Senate performance and in particular his reasonable stance on immigration.

Their hope of retaining influence rests on saddling McCain with a proven rightist as his vice-presidential choice. The hunt is now on for the new Cheney, but such a candidate has to be brought in under the radar because the public is for the first time in modern history keenly aware that the vice president can play an enormously destructive role. That is particularly true if the potential president himself is, actuarially speaking, more likely to kick the bucket. Or, less dramatically, simply underperforms.

Let's not kid any longer. Age is a factor in this race and nowhere is it so important as in McCain's vice-presidential choice. If he picks from the very thin ranks of reasonable Republicans, it will be reassuring to more moderate voters attracted to McCain for his independence of thought as reflected in support of campaign finance reform and his opposition to some outrageously bloated military weapons expenditures that he has on occasion done much to expose. But if he turns to the loony wing for a running mate, we must become very concerned about the ability of a man in his 70s to fully perform in the world's most important office. Is there another Cheney lurking in the wings?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: vice president, election 2008, age, republicans, mccain

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They protected Bush
Posted by: Crazy H on Apr 30, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're not so much interested in what kind of job McSame will do as to whether they can convince us he's a Good Guy. They hid Bush's obvious shortcomings behind a smoke screen of PR. They told us that his apparent stupidity was really a smart ploy.

You know, the same way they tried to convince us that Reagan was president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Scheer, you seem to have retained your sanity much better than McCain
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 30, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are some very interesting points in this article. I have no problem with McCain's age. I want an even older man for president, Mike Gravel. But in my support for him I would hope he would select a much younger man like Dennis Kucinich. Ralph Nader is starting to get rather old and I very much approve of his selection of a young Matt Gonzalez.

It's a terrible shame the old guys I like don't stand much of a chance in the choreographed scam we call an election.

The best we could hope for if McCain is selected president would be if he is as big a campaign liar as the current scumbag occupying the White House. Maybe everything he is saying is a lie like bush's campaign was. Unlikely but he might better than he is promoting himself to be, opposite of bush's example but lies nonetheless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagan used to take long naps during important...
Posted by: xvictor on May 1, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....oval office meetings. McCain will be no different, that is, if he's elected. Not even Reagan's oversized jelly bean jar will help him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To Get A Handle...
Posted by: bobtr900 on May 1, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...on this topic we must all remember that Reagan was the sleeping Alzheimer president. So exactly WHO ran the country then????

As far as McCain goes we do not know who the Republican Party is planning to be his Veep. My fear is that it will be Jeb Bush.

So any Repub voter that is thinking, I'll vote for him because he can only be the prez for a short time so I'll give him a chance and if he is another Bush he will only be in office for four years. But what if the Rethugs make Jeb his Veep. So for the rest of us, we'll have another Bush.

The Bushs are weak willed people of mediocre intelligence and poor values. Their collective character is that they are manipulable by others of strong will and who will pander to their need for fame(aggrandizement) and ever more fortune, especially oil fortunes. The Bush family just seems to be a group of cold, shalllow and callous people who are almost bereft of human values. And being weak willed people with very poor core values they are very corruptable.

Also being a Catholic(my religion also) Jeb is very susceptable/vulnerable to control by the Pope. The Pope is driven by his Catholic ideologies. These are the very same ideologies that proved to be death to Jews and suppression of women most of Church history.

Also Catholic Church ideology attacked and imprisoned Galileo for saying that his astronomical observations showed that we lived in a heliocentric/solar system because his observations differed from Church doctrine. It sounds like Lysenkoism to me. Look it up. That same ideology was responsible for the Crusades which saw the slaughter of Muslims and Jews in the ME.

From that same ideology the world got the Spanish Inquisition, the torture and death of 'nonbelievers' who were called heretics and therefore deserving of death.

Then under Pope Pius XI(Reichskonkordat of 1933) the Church aligned itself with Hitler and the Nazis and Musollini and the Facsists. In 1939 Pope Pius XII continued this alignment throughout WWII and even after when he and the Church helped Nazis to escape, the Nuremberg Trials, by providing sanctuary and safe passage to South America, Catholic countries where the Church exercised much power and control. WWII saw the death of some 60 million human beings, including some six million Jews. So I am led to ask just how much did Catholic Church ideology cause or contribute to WWII. And how much of Catholic Church ideology contribute to the death of the six million Jews.

Since 1978(election of Pope John Paul II) the Church has been and still is closely aligned with the Republican Party (itself using Nazi tactics and holding Fascists beliefs). He was a major force in putting Reagan into the presidency. I do not believethat the Church has any right being involved in American politics and policy either foreign or domestic; thus subverting the will of the American people. The Church continues to be closely aligned with the Republican Party even though it is the main source of death, torture and destruction in the present day, as we all know. And all of this is supposed to be Pro-Life and Family Values. SAYS WHO???? Sounds totally like torture and death to me.

And Jeb Bush (Republican and Catholic) is just waiting in the wings for his turn to...???? Will he continue the use of aggressive and militant religious ideology to promote the beliefs of the Catholic Church and the Republican Party???? There is much to think about and worry about and be fearful of if we care about America and it's continuation.

Our long cherished and now shredded US Constitution is under continuous fire and has been negated by the Republican Party. Scalia(Republican and Catholic same as Jeb Bush) in a speech he gave in 2000 called for and advocated for the "End of the Rule of Law and the End of Democracy in America".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the nuttier the better
Posted by: ibivi on May 1, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd love to see him select some right-win loon. The sooner his campaign tanks the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the nuttier the better
Posted by: ibivi on May 1, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, that should be right-wing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: No country for old men? The alternative is a Kaddish are you ready?
Posted by: Nightstallion on May 1, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have heard the thing say: “it’s Clobberin’ time!” , enough to know that it really may be now. John McCain’s reasons for not being in the damned White House has nothing to do with his penchant for age related disabilities and everything to do with the misrepresentation of this miscreant as a functional caring human being. I know I’m 62 and not getting any younger

It is my contention that this shill WILL be President just in the same manner as Bush IS and was President. He will be declared so as part of the New American Tradition of Usurpation of Voters rights, ballots and the so-called Electoral Collage. He will be PROCLAIMED President by a group of Judges, a National Committee representing this, or that Majority Faction of “Voters for the Truth”. In short, there will be no election as we knew it..

The way murderers obtain and maintain power is no mystery to me. Drunkards all love the tough guy on the block because in their alcoholic haze they must identify with unchecked Power to feel justified in their impotence. Bullies are MADE not born pull your head out of your alcoholic ass long enough and you will begin to see in a few months. No one can think with the little grey cells pickling in the Booze.

Believe it or not, I was a C.O. (Conscientious Objector) during the Viet Nam Era who JOINED to keep from being jailed or worse CONSCRIPTED into a war I didn’t believe in. That fucking error will not occur again! If you let your children go into that war don't tell me about it or I must knock you down and urinate in your face dig me? How’s that for being a bully. Don’t give me any fecal material about it being the young adult’s choice, I didn’t have one!

Now, as for you, Oh sayer of great philosophical truths, supporter of the man behind the man theory, you are correct. That is, if and only if you tumble to the geas you are stitching about deleterious effects of aging on the mind and physiognomy. I personally had a master who at the degenerated age of 87 leapt six feet to the top of a wall and ran 16 feet upon its edge before dismounting with a flip and two footed stable landing on the ground. Not usual true, but far from abnormal for those who keep in shape. So feed your body and those little grey cells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kvass
Posted by: kvass on May 1, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are right about aging. I am 73 and I have kept my self in reasonably good shape all my life but in the past three years knowing what it is to be in good shape I have found quite a bit of deterioration both physically and mentally. In McCain's case you have a man who will be going on 73 by January 09 so the choice of VP as you correctly observed is of the utmost importance. But what is interesting about this primary vetting system the country goes through for 18 months is that the choice for his VP will not have gone through that important process. Check out the insurance companies actuary figures. From the moment he is inaugurated he has an over 38 per cent of dropping dead but add to that you have the immense pressure of the job. Yes of course it is no country for an old man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Scheer and I are both old farts
Posted by: goodsensecynic on May 1, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My first exposure to Bob Scheer's work was in a paperback book that he published in about 1962 and was entitled Cuba: An American Tragedy. It still holds up.

Throughout the 1960s and later, I continued to read his journalism - often in Ramparts if I am not mistaken, but I may be having a "senior's moment."

I only want to mention that I was often told that that my 1960s rebelliousness (I am technically a "pre-boomer") was a "phase" I was going through and that I would eventually "grow up."

Sorry, I am now in my sixties and more radical than ever.

I am Canadian, white and love what the Rev. Jeremiah Write has to say. I'd also have put Bertrand Russell - in his nineties - on the US Supreme Court were that in my power ... or his.

NEVER TRUST ANYONE UNDER SIXTY ... and darned few of them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mcbush and ?
Posted by: willymack on May 1, 2008 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Age for some, like mcsame is a serious consideration. For somebody like Gore Vidal, for instance, it doesn't mean doodley-squat. He's in his eighties, and even if he got a frontal lobotomy, he'd STILL be able to think rings around mcloser. So, who's the best running mate for big mac? Why, suckass and turncoat, joe lieberman, that's who. This would ensure a Democratic victory in November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mcbush and ? Posted by: cherylsass123
No Country For Old Men
Posted by: bogieboy1 on May 1, 2008 2:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone think Joe Lieberman will be on the short list for VP?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go the distance
Posted by: amazingjim on May 3, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Confidence in McCain will be exuberantly improved with his embracing Cheney as his running mate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicans will vote for the V.P., not McCaine
Posted by: Last Chance on May 4, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If McCaine was elected and tried to work a full schedule his Vice President would replace him during his first year in office. That's the Republican strategy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on May 7, 2008 3:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings which could have or did kill innocent people?"

John McCain


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]