Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

Corporate America Hearts Obama

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted April 30, 2008.


Obama’s campaign message, filled with lofty promises of change and hope, is also filled with repeated reassurances to the corporate elite.
Advertisement

The corporate state is our shadow government. Candidates who aspire to higher office get corporate money if they promote corporate interests. They are shut out of the national debate -- look at Dennis Kucinich and Ralph Nader -- if they do not. Defy the corporate state and you get handed a ticket to oblivion. You become invisible. Work for it and you are showered with tens of millions of dollars and the possibility of political power.

Barack Obama's campaign message, filled with lofty promises of change and hope, is also filled with repeated reassurances to the corporate elite. Pick up a copy of Obama's book "The Audacity of Hope." The subtext is clear. It is a steady reminder to corporate America, a reminder bolstered by Obama's voting record, that corporations would have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency.

"Of course," he writes, "there are those within the Democratic Party who tend toward similar zealotry. But those who do have never come close to possessing the power of a Rove or a DeLay, the power to take over the party, fill it with loyalists, and enshrine some of their more radical ideas into law. The prevalence of regional, ethnic, and economic differences within the party, the electoral map and the structure of the Senate, the need to raise money from economic elites to finance elections -- all these things tend to prevent Democrats in office from straying too far from the center. In fact, I know very few elected Democrats who neatly fit the liberal caricature; the last I checked, John Kerry believes in maintaining the superiority of the U.S. military, Hillary Clinton believes in the virtues of capitalism, and just about every member of the Congressional Black Caucus believes Jesus Christ died for his or her sins."

He praises the "recognizably progressive" Bill Clinton, whose disastrous welfare reform he lauds, for showing that "government spending and regulation could, if properly designed, serve as vital ingredients and not inhibitors to economic growth, and how markets and fiscal discipline could help promote social justice. He recognized that not only societal responsibility but personal responsibility was needed to combat poverty." Obama excoriates "those who still champion the old-time religion, defending every New Deal and Great Society program from Republican encroachment, achieving ratings of 100 percent from the liberal interest groups. But these efforts seem exhausted, a constant game of defense, bereft of energy and new ideas needed to address the changing circumstances of globalization or a stubbornly isolated inner city."

"Our Constitution places the ownership of private property at the very heart of our system of liberty," he writes. "Our religious traditions celebrate the value of hard work and express the conviction that a virtuous life will result in material reward. Rather than vilify the rich, we hold them up as role models, and our mythology is steeped in stories of men on the make -- the immigrant who comes to this country with nothing and strikes it big, the young man who heads West in search of his fortune. As Ted Turner famously said, in America money is how we keep score."

The corporations have gotten the message. The same Beltway lobbyists, corporate donors and public relations firms, the same weapons manufacturers, defense contractors, nuclear power companies and Wall Street interests that give Clinton and John McCain money, give Obama money. They happen, in fact, to give Obama more. And the corporate state, which is carrying out a coup d'état in slow motion, believes it will prosper in Obama's hands. If not, he would not be a viable candidate. We have come full circle, back to the age of the robber barons and railroad magnates of the late 19th century who selected members of corrupt state assemblies to be their pliable senators and congressmen and sent them off to Washington to do their bidding.

There have been some important investigations into Obama's links with major corporations, including Ken Silverstein's November 2006 article "Barack Obama Inc: The Birth of a Washington Machine" in Harper's magazine. Newsweek has also detailed many of Obama's major corporate contributors. Obama's Leadership PAC includes John Gorman of Texas-based Tejas Securities, a major supporter of Senate Democrats as well as the Bush presidential campaigns. It includes Winston & Strawn, the Chicago-based law and lobbying firm. It also includes the corporate law firms Kirkland & Ellis, and Skadden, Arps, where four attorneys are fundraisers for Obama as well as donors. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Henry Crown and Co., an investment firm that has stakes in industries ranging from telecommunications to defense, are all funding the Illinois senator.

Individual contributors to Obama come from major lobbyist groups such as those of Jeffrey Peck (whose clients include MasterCard, the Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce) and Rich Tarplin (Chevron, the American Petroleum Institute and the National Association of Manufacturers). Exelon, a leading nuclear plant operator, based in Illinois, is a long-time donor to the Obama campaign. Exelon executives and employees have contributed at least $227,000 to Obama's campaigns for the United States Senate and for president. Two top Exelon officials, Frank M. Clark, executive vice president, and John W. Rogers Jr., a director, are among his largest fundraisers. Obama has also accepted more than $213,000 from individuals (and their spouses) who work for companies in the oil and gas industry, and two of Obama's bundlers are senior oil company executives who have raised between $50,000 and $100,000. I could go on, but you get the point.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporate elite, mccain, clinton, barack obama, obama, lobbyists

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, was the Middle East bureau chief for The New York Times. He spent seven years in the Middle East and reported frequently from Iran. His latest book is American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama is not the messiah
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Apr 30, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is going to be good. I wonder how Obamaites will spin this story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: msalganik
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: dronkenpiraat
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: perkywa
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» Wow--are you ever high! Posted by: asilsfable
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: NeoLotus
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: willymack
» Your attempt at failed logic is frightening Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Your attempt at logic is not logical Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Obama is not the messiah Posted by: carbon-based
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 30, 2008 1:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I'll be damned...


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THE ANTICHRIST IS ALVE AND WELL Posted by: mindtrvlr
God is dead, again. And again, many people go on believing and the spirit lingers with them.
Posted by: Rune on Apr 30, 2008 1:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And as with Zarathustra, the news falls mostly on those without the ears to hear it.

"“When we set truth on its head we usually fail to notice that our head too is not standing where it ought to stand.”

I find it fascinating to see so many people who go out of their way to bash the religious while proclaiming their own superior grasp of facts and rationality continue to invest their faith in Obama as some sort of "once in a lifetime" agent for progressive change when the facts and the trajectory of his career so clearly say otherwise. As the man of faith who was, until very recently, Obama's pastor (recent revisionist history for political ends notwithstanding) noted, Obama is a politician and he makes the sort of politically calculated decisions and statements (and reversal of statements) that are common to most politicians. If this was not obvious, a fair reading of this excellent essay and a check of its facts should make it so.

“When we have to change our minds about a person, we hold the inconvenience he causes us very much against him.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fact Check Posted by: oregoncharles
Forgot to mention . . .
Posted by: Rune on Apr 30, 2008 1:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is an interesting article in the current edition of der Spiegel International that explains why Obama will almost certainly end up with the Democratic nomination despite his most recent difficulties with finding his voice and values while trying to make it look as though he never lost them; a situation the article describes thusly:

"His message of hope and change is beginning to sound like a broken record. Phrases like "We are the ones we've been waiting for" sound lofty at first, but they eventually lose their appeal.

Nevertheless, the debate that has now begun comes too late for Hillary Clinton. [. . .] A vote by superdelegates against Obama would set off shock waves within American society, with incalculable consequences. Young people would be outraged, intellectuals would be bitter and violence could erupt in predominantly black urban neighborhoods around the country."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An Excellent Article ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 30, 2008 2:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chris Hedges exposes the duopoly of American politics and the transnational corporatism that now dictates to the leadership of both political parties.

I miss John Edwards ... and I'll bet many of you do too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An Excellent Article ... Posted by: operdoc
» RE: Not supporting Hillary. . Posted by: oregoncharles
Yes and....
Posted by: gabemott on Apr 30, 2008 2:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes. I get it. I probably would agree if I were to research and confirm all of the statements and associations you illustrate as Obama's connection with the corporate stead.

And, that's not the point. You're missing the train. I've been with Kucinich for years, also respect my conservative relatives on the midland farms, believe in progressivism, equal rights, health care for all. I've been pretty liberal my whole life.

Obama is not offering revolution. And unless you are ready to stop paying taxes as a start, neither are you.

No he's not going to destroy Walmart in a day. He's not going to demand payments from the rich to the poor. He's not going to radically shift America's demographic conscience today.

I've always argued for people's right to vote how they feel-- if they wanted Nader, or want Hillary now, I fundamentally believe that democracy only works if people feel free to vote for who they want to win. I support that.

And I'm voting for Obama. Obama has a right vision for our future. He allows us to see our own role in the outcome. He calls on the better part of ourselves to rise up.

I don't expect him to immediately attack corporations. That's a job for the people. If you expect to elect a president that is going to take down capitalism, you shouldn't vote and you shouldn't give the government any money. You should probably take over a media outlet, get some big guns, or get rich (being a capitalist) and buy the politicians.

Until then, we've got an option that for the first time in my 36 year old life, gives me tingles to think that he could be president. It's opportunity I'n not going to miss.

Get Aboard.

"If you can't get a board, get a shingle"
--my great uncle once removed when I was ten.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: bbfmail
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: gabemott
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: wearesilhouettes
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: msalganik
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: mclemens
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: gjohloc@hotmail.com
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: Tom Tele
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: mclemens
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: gabemott
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: Yes and.... Posted by: lamac66
Politicians Have to Live in The Real World If They Want To Get Elected
Posted by: opmoc on Apr 30, 2008 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is merely pointing out the obvious. Change has got to come from within the system. I'm English and don't have a vote for the US Presidency - but the US does have massive influence on the World - look what Bush has done.

As an example of change from within (much to the detriment) Tony Blair infiltrated the UK Labour Party with powerful speeches, soundbites and a new image - and very effectively turned it into a right wing corporate fascist party - that decimated the rights and political power of the ordinary working man.

The old UK Labour party would never have supported the War in Iraq - and would never have become a poodle of an extreme right wing US Government.

My view of Obama is that he offers real hope for change. But you can't change anything without power - and you can't attain power without the support of the rich powerful elite.

Its entirely possible that Obama might gradually move the balance away from the interests of the richest towards the great mass of humanity (ie everyone else).

Of course there is very little choice and democracy has become such an illusion, that I am very seriously considering never voting again.

But if I was a US citizen I would vote for Obama as a last desperate hope of pulling us all back from the brink.

America may not fully realise how desperately tarnished it's image has become since Bush gained power.

The World runs on image and perception. Electing a Black Man would send out a very powerful message to the World that America has changed for the better.

On the 1st January 2000 I could not possibly envisage the current state of World Tryanny achieved within 8 years of the New Millenium.

It is an absolutely appalling start and we should all feel completely ashamed that we have allowed it to happen.

We are all members of the human race - just look what we have done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Contact your superdelegates
Posted by: Jackdemocracy08 on Apr 30, 2008 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Sen. Hillary Clinton has ‘managed’ to take the Pennsylvania state, the Democratic race for nomination is very much alive – and most likely to be decided by superdelegates. Nevertheless.. Indiana ,Idaho and West Virginia are still to come.

If you’re tired of waiting around for those super delegates to make a decision already, go to LobbyDelegates.com and push them to support Clinton or Obama

If you haven't done so yet, please write a message to each of your state's superdelegates at http://www.lobbydelegates.com


It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Obama in office?!

Sending a note to current Obama supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Clinton supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Obama, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Obama. It's that easy...

Clinton Supporters too …. !

It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Clinton in office?!

Sending a note to current Clinton supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Obama supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Clinton, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Clinton. It's that easy...

REALLY easy to identify the superdelegates and reach out to them! It includes a list of names, addresses, and affiliations of superdelegates from each state including your state

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its not a done deal...
Posted by: xi_people on Apr 30, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a peek at the rash of embarrassing stories involving Obama's former pastor. Those stories would not be carried by the mainstream media -- and featured so prominently -- if Corporate America was "in love with him." Some powerful people are obviously trying to take him down, leaving the field clear for HillBilly.

I would love to see it. America deserves a "presidential" race between McCain and HillBilly. Let's face it, when it all comes down to the very basic essence of a people, Americans -- by and large -- are racist warmongers. That's the bottom line, and the two noted candidates fit that electorate to a "T".

I agree that Obama is a huge fraud. He spouts nothing but nebulous promises for "hope" that he'll never be able to keep. In addition, running for president is forcing him to abandon virtually all of the positive influences that nurtured and molded him as an individual. No one can last very long in such a state. The strongest individuals establish their personal bedrock of beliefs, and don't stray far from them. Trying to be everything to everybody is a recipe for disaster.

Having said all of that, Obama is certainly a better person than either HillBilly or McCain, but he is beholden to the same monied elite that they are. And he will do their bidding, make no mistake. He doesn't have a choice.

Thus, there are no viable candidates to lead the country back from the brink. The American "experiment" is finished -- killed off by rampant greed and corruption. All that remains is for it to become obvious to all but the most oblivious Faux-watcher.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its not a done deal... Posted by: gazooks
» RE: Its not a done deal... Posted by: gjohloc@hotmail.com
McGovern Reforms and the superdelegates
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Apr 30, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Humphrey stole the 1968 election through caucuses that were skewed in his favor, Senator George McGovern fought to reform the nominating process, and thus we have more primaries and fewer caucuses.

Obama's lead comes from the caucus states, where far fewer voters were able to participate in the process; millions of eligible voters were excluded for lack of time to participate.

The reforms needed are not top-down, as we will have through the corporations, but grassroots, in spite of the dictates and the controlled marketplace of the corporations.

Obama will try to spoon feed us corporate "leadership" reforms? Only to the extent that those corporations continue to control the marketplace and the options that we are allowed. The real reforms can only come from greater degrees of self-autonomy, from having the option to produce our own goods, capture our own energy from the sun and wind, and build our own future environments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HEY
Posted by: lesterliu on Apr 30, 2008 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lets hand the America to the youngs and the inspirationals. let the old politics and old folks enjoy their retirement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's Chickens Come Home to Roost
Posted by: rozz62 on Apr 30, 2008 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's Chickens Come Home to Roost
That’s what Obama gets for his support and defense of the Rev Wright. Obama stated in his speech“Wright is like an uncle you love and respect” As imperfect as he may be, he has been family to me for so many years, I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community” Obama is now declaring himself shocked and disappointed at Wright's unrepentantly racist and anti-American views? Obamas obviously support his feelings of anti-America and white hatred that the church endoreses to stay for 20 years also why would a parent continue to raise their young daughters in that atmosphere .Obama can no longer plausibly claim innocence in this matter, because he is the one who has encouraged Wright by trying to excuse and explain his views. All of this is why it is no use for Obama to backpedal from his association with Reverend Wright, or to denounce him now, six weeks too late. It was Obama who sought to provide the Reverend Wright with immunity from criticism--and he can't complain when the reverend tries to take full advantage of that immunity. This is the final collapse of the noble promise of the Obama campaign. The man who had once put himself forward as the candidate who would transcend racial politics once and for all has ended up legitimizing a Christian equivalent of Louis Farrakhan--and injecting him into the American political debate. Wright “Calls for Justice and Repair,” followed a statement in which he declared that “The Biblical principle of true repentance is that the offended party is given compensation to make up for that which has been stolen from them, the losses that have been inflicted upon them and their families.” A reparations plan for blacks could extract several trillion dollars from American taxpayers’ pockets. THERES ABSOLUTLY NO CHANGE WITH OBAMA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama's Chickens Come Home to Roost Posted by: gjohloc@hotmail.com
Otto
Posted by: otto on Apr 30, 2008 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see Obama, not as our great hope, but as the lesser of three evils. This article gives me a lot more reason to feel this way. I would prefer to back Kucinich or Richardson if they were still in the race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Otto Posted by: wearesilhouettes
If we had a real Democracy..
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 30, 2008 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Firs tTwo Parties would not rule the land. these Primaries would be of little interest to most americans. also these parties would have all people vote throughout the country On th esame day with all candidates running under that platform included for consideraton. No more Dragged out elimiantion process that essentially limits later states to what has been left for them to choose From.
I voted for Kucinich in the MI Primary (rigged). But because of 'Money'he never got the chance to compete in later states. Now we are left with what the Monetary eelction has left US. This is not Democracy this is the one with the most $$$ wins- Buys the election.
I will support Obama, but will consider Paul if still allowed to be on the ballot.
Mac & Hillary -I know Far Too Much about, and have Seen Who they work for and Who they plead their Allegience to for far too long (Heckova Job on the Armed Services Com-con). It's going to be long long road back to the Ideals of Our founding Fathers (they couldnt even put it all together). I will take one step forward, the one that gets US back involved-whether he (they)likes it or not WE have been Re Engaged (Provoked- we are not 'bitter' we are Pissed!)
and Nadar again is just another Red Herring, an intentional 'spoiler', a Facade!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» will consider Paul Posted by: Persephone8
Lets be clear...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 30, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate America loves ALL THREE candidates. That is why they are the final candidates for the nomination. You don't get to run for either of the major parties unless Corporate America loves you.

Government and business aren't really all that seperate anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lets be clear... Posted by: Lauren
It's All Over
Posted by: Chromedome2000 on Apr 30, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all over and has been at least since the 2000 elections and probably much earlier than that. Voting is pointless, a charade the ruling elite allow us just to make us all feel better. It's pretty damn obvious that whatever we do isn't going to make any difference in the end anyway. Personally I don't think anybody should vote until a transparent system is (somehow) installed. That means bye-bye computer driven voting machines at the very least. Also campaign funding reform is desperately needed. These and a thousand other things need changed. But I doubt any of that will be "allowed". I wish I had the answers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's All Over Posted by: Lauren
marygold
Posted by: marygold on Apr 30, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone thinks a true populist can show his/her colors BEFORE ACTUALLY GETTING ELECTED and actually get elected...while the coalition of corporate fascist billionaires sit idly by......c'mon....he's doing what a pragmatist has to do (remain apparently friendly toward the powerful monster) to stay alive (both politically and literally (in that when someone threatens the ability of the super-rich to keep getting richer...they will dispatch whatever is necessary to eliminate the threat).... It's naive to think a Dennis K approach could prevail in this world dominated by the oligopolists. Let's get Obama or Hillary in there (we, the progressives can work with either one once they're elected.....)

Oh, and please don't imagine that anyone really believes that the coalition of corporations...the megatechnological juggernaut...can realistically be stopped by any peaceful means. I think they collectively have the NRA attitude going with regard to their perpetual money machines..."from my cold dead hands" will you pry my corporation...

cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: marygold Posted by: Lauren
Obama Bashing
Posted by: Urstrly on Apr 30, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what is Hedges' point? Dennis and Ralph are finished, except in Ralph's case, a possible role as spoiler.

None of the three remaining candidates is pure, but that doesn't make them all the same.

McCain seems to have forgotten every popularist sentiment that he ever voiced and to have reversed it with fervor. Who in America still believes that the free market can save us all? That tax cuts free up resources that trickle down? Only the players, and they'd rather have McCain than the others. Even with our economy in shambles, Bush/McCain can't admit how unbridled capitalism brought it on.

My question for Hedges would be: how do Obama and Clinton stack up against each other? Is the woman who served on Walmart's board and sucks up to Murdoch less corporately prone than Obama? Or equal? Does he believe that Obama would still be in the race if he had spoken like Edwards?

I'm not expecting a Second Coming if a Democrat gets elected, but let's not kid ourselves that it will make no difference. It was that argument that lost Al Gore the election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Bashing Posted by: CJC
That's what I'm trying to warn people about Obama.
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 30, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The dude's no different from Hillary and Mccain even if he tries to sprinkle "hope and faith" BULLSHIT the same way Dubya did back in 2000. If you don't like these corporate kissups, do what I'm doing. FIGHTING HARD to get Ralph Nader on the ballot and giving more reason to support his candidacy. While I wished he were the Green Party nominee, I'm willing to accept his independent candidacy because he really does stand up for what he says he stands up for and doesn't take corporate cash. Now tell me how Mccain/Obama/Hillary are any different among the three.

Spread the word:

VOTENADER.ORG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Would you two please get a room? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
dont forgit G.E.
Posted by: wittler youth on Apr 30, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They donated 450.000 $ to him..and 650.000 to hillery..bet hedgeing at its best..and they own a lot of media folks..it all reeks of fruad..same as it ever was..just paste a new face on who you want up your ass for the next 4 years..lol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Edwards, please, get off that jet ski and slap these two around a little...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 30, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Howard Dean might need a sock stuffed in his mouth as well - Nancy Pelosi will be running against Cindy Sheehan, who feels Pelosi is worse than Feinstein. Nader will be taking Republican money and collecting his speaking fees, Pastor Wright is busy making a mockery of the legacy of Martin Luther King - Amos & Andy reborn - is he a white guy in blackface or something? Cornell West was right - the man is a clown.

What about the Republicans? Think McCain, think the second Reagan term. Senility is already setting in - and let me just say that the image of Lieberman whispering in McCain's ear is unnerving. So are the recent Obama-Clinton debates - oh, how we miss the presence of Kucinich and Edwards in those debates - and why, oh why, not a Ron Paul - McCain debate?

Hedges doesn't understand much about this, poor thing. After all, the left is just as guilty as the right on this one. Pandering to the corporate media - which is a very large category, actually. Pacifica, home of "major corporate media critics Amy Goodman & Juan Gonzalez" is a non-profit corporate structure. They will be boosting Nader to the hilt, as usual, and trying to whip up enthusiasm for a major "might be violent" "Re-Create 68" protest at the Democratic campaign.

FOXBusiness is excited about that, because, quote,

"WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain has moved ahead of both of his potential Democratic rivals in a Zogby International poll that also includes independent Ralph Nader on the ballot. . . Consumer activist Nader polls at 6% in a general-election matchup between McCain and Clinton and at 5% in a McCain-Obama tilt. "Nader's presence in the race can potentially turn a lulu of a race into an absolute tizzy," said pollster John Zogby. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.

Maxpay