Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

Did McCain Avoid Voting on a Key 9/11 Bill Because He's Afraid of the Neocons?

By Cliff Schecter, PoliPoint Press. Posted April 10, 2008.


McCain's official calendar says he was in California on the day of a key security vote, but he was actually in the Senate, voting on 15 other bills.
therealmccaincoverweb1
The Real McCain by Cliff Schecter (PoliPoint Press, 2008).
Advertisement

Some of John McCain's best friends are Neocons. So much so that he signed a letter in 1998 to President Clinton, that among other things stated that "the only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq is able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction." So when John McCain tells you that 9/11 changed his way of thinking, unless he's referring to 9/11/98, chalk it up to more of that famous "straight-talk."

Other signatories of this letter included a cast of characters who would become infamous for doing foreign policy the way Lindsay Lohan does driving. Including: Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz. Yes, those geniuses.

So when, on March 13, 2007, he didn't show up to vote on the "Keeping America Secure Act," one had to wonder what kind of agenda he's really committed to. Whatever the merits of that piece of legislation, one might have expected McCain, who portrays himself as a staunch defender against future 9/11s, to at least debate the issue. Upon further inspection it gets even more fishy.

McCain had 16 votes that day. He made 15 of them. The only one he missed was the one to codify the 9/11 Commission recommendations. And coincidentally, of course, Neocons hated those recommendations, because they talked about meeting with the Iranians and Syrians, for example, instead of just blowing them up. The following excerpt from my new book, The Real McCain (PoliPoint Press, 2008) explains what went down.

***

Unlike George W. Bush, McCain could never be accused of being AWOL from the military. But an examination of his congressional voting record might earn him the tag AWOC, or "Absent Without Courage." For McCain has shown that when it comes to the tough votes, the ones requiring him to take a stand, he adheres to the ancient philosophy espoused by Mr. Miyagi from The Karate Kid: "Best defense, no be there."

Simply put, in the first session of the 110th Congress (2007), the senator from Arizona missed, by a wide margin, more votes than any of his Senate colleagues but one, Democrat Tim Johnson, who was sidelined with a serious brain hemorrhage.

According to the Washington Post database tracking Senate "vote missers," McCain had missed a whopping 261 of 468 votes, or almost 56 percent, by March 2008. McCain is understandably busy running for president -- and all the candidates running for that highest of offices in 2008 have shown a poor record in showing up for votes. But number of votes missed is one thing; which votes you miss is another. McCain the maverick has missed votes in a way that betrays a calculated strategy: namely, to avoid going on the record when doing so would be politically risky.

On March 13, 2007, a critical roll call vote was held in the Senate on the Improving America's Security Act, which codified implementation of the 9/11 Commission recommendations for protecting America. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were there. So were then presidential candidates senators Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Joe Biden of Delaware, and Sam Brownback of Kansas. Where was John McCain? According to his official calendar, he was in California for a series of big-money fundraisers.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: senate vote, 9/11, john mccain

Cliff Schecter is a political consultant and author. He is the author of "The Real McCain" (PoliPoint Press, 2008). Read his blog at the the Agonist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 10, 2008 2:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McLizard, Shillary & SmoovB...

That's IT?


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shaddap. Posted by: fanny666
Unless I'm Mistaken...
Posted by: Tim Brown on Apr 10, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain did not sign that 1998 letter to Clinton. I have attached the link here from the PNAC site - http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Did anyone find anything that links to this letter?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unless I'm Mistaken... Posted by: ragamuffin
» Maybe PNAC scrubbed his name from the letter Posted by: trappedintwilightzone
» PNAC letter was in 2000, not 1998 Posted by: realtruther
Blackwater Mitt
Posted by: US Citizen on Apr 10, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect the Neo-Cons will force McCain to choose "Blackwater" Mitt Romney as his vice-president, and then McCain will have to quit his Presidency early in his term due to some mysterious heart-related illness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Apr 10, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's true that he was indeed in the Senate - yet his website says he was on the other side of the country - then you already have the tone of his Presidency.

If he's lying now you know he has no problem lying later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Entitlement
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 10, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain believes that he's entitled to the presidency. He's seventy one and he's carried water for Bush, the neocons and the Republican party for years. Bush dirty tricked him out of the last election process and McCain responded like a true trooper and supported Bush and his policies. He thinks that he's earned and is entitled to the presidency. He's boxed in to a way of doing politics that has worked in the past and he' depending on it to work again for him. I hope that the voters don't fall for the tricks and falsehoods of the Republican slime machine and terror mongers and vote him into office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John MCCain IS a neocon!
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 10, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First and foremost, he's a PNAC signatory.

His association with Bill Kristol's neofascist organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), reveals McCain for what he TRULY is: a rightwinger in moderate clothing.

To learn more about PNAC, including the names of its 225 signatories, visit the investigative website, www.FreedomCentralUSA.com.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, ARDENT Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John McCain is a plastic fantastic newly-minted Neocon.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 10, 2008 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lieberman has been assigned to follow McCain around and whisper in his ear.

That's Lieberman of the Committee on the Present Danger, a little group of right-wing patrician fanatics headed up by Joe Lieberman, George Schultz, James Woolsey, etc. The CPD members (over 50) are also affiliates of the American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, the Project for a New American Century, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Boeing Company.

These guys are into permanent war for permanent profit, and represent the shadiest elements in U.S. politics today. That's who McCain has decided to join up with, because he's thinks that that is his route to political power. It's sad and pathetic, but that's what McCain has become.

The growing connections between McCain and the neocons, and the growing gap between the military and the neocons are discussed in this short clip from the Real News Network

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pathetic
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 10, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain is a straight talking maverick like I am Miss America.

To watch him cow-tow to the bushies and neocons has been nothing short of pathetic.

The fact that approximately 50% of the population supports this guy for president is one of the most discouraging things I've heard in a long time.

A McCain presidency would be a total disaster....probably as bad as Bush or maybe even worse. HELP!

VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone see the "It's Raining John McCain" video?
Posted by: Pennyhead on Apr 10, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to YourThreeCents.com and check it out!! Here is one of our responses...

Posted by TexasGal
on April 9, 2008, 1:24 pm

are u kidding me!!!

MCCAIN IS A WOMANNIZER!!!

HES HAD LIKE FOUR WIVES

and those women are GROSS

HOW COULD ANY OF YOU WANT MCCAIN IN OFFICE?



This could POSSIBLY BE one of the WORST presidential candidate pools ever. See what America’s Youth is saying about each of the candidates, what they have done for the campaigns and for OUR future.

www.YourThreeCents.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This guy is a real shame!
Posted by: The Big Raven on Apr 10, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know in most cultures the elders are the ones who are held in reverence for thier knowledge of life and the ballance we humans must acheive to survive on this mother earth.
Most elders who are in ballance with the world are "NEVER' angry or say really stupid and dumb things like this wanna-be "elder statesmen" who has never shown any real evidence of caring for others except himself or the same old "privillaged whites" that has turned washinton into who ever lobbies with the most payola wins and it ALLWAYS the same OLD whitemen who benifit from this type of phoney "wisdoom".
And if the truth be known as america votes in another crazy election and brings in this elder clown who most would not give him a second look (lack of re-spect not willing to look at twice)if america votes this senile oldman in who by the way SOLD-OUT his fellow soldiers in Vietnam (and if you do not beleive me LOOK IT UP YOUR-SELF)so he could be treated more softly the pussy spilled his guts and theres is MANY accounts of these very important interveiws he has done all the while eating better food and being treated better than any of his fellow soldiers who were really being tortured a few cells away.
On the other hand maybe america deserves this senile old fool who will push the button to save his old ass again he thinks......so sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is McCain afraid of the neocons?
Posted by: willymack on Apr 10, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he's in his right mind he's scared half to death of the murdering bastards. Aren't all of us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To Tim Brown and ragamuffin
Posted by: trappedintwilightzone on Apr 10, 2008 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You might be right. But what if the neocons are "supporting" their candidate by scrubbing John's name from the letter on PNAC's web site?

Don't think I'd trust PNAC as my source for ANYthing.

Between Cliff Schecter and PNAC, guess who I'm gonna believe?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]