COMMENTS: 23
Did McCain Avoid Voting on a Key 9/11 Bill Because He's Afraid of the Neocons?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2008 headlines via email.
Other signatories of this letter included a cast of characters who would become infamous for doing foreign policy the way Lindsay Lohan does driving. Including: Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz. Yes, those geniuses.
So when, on March 13, 2007, he didn't show up to vote on the "Keeping America Secure Act," one had to wonder what kind of agenda he's really committed to. Whatever the merits of that piece of legislation, one might have expected McCain, who portrays himself as a staunch defender against future 9/11s, to at least debate the issue. Upon further inspection it gets even more fishy.
McCain had 16 votes that day. He made 15 of them. The only one he missed was the one to codify the 9/11 Commission recommendations. And coincidentally, of course, Neocons hated those recommendations, because they talked about meeting with the Iranians and Syrians, for example, instead of just blowing them up. The following excerpt from my new book, The Real McCain (PoliPoint Press, 2008) explains what went down.
***
Unlike George W. Bush, McCain could never be accused of being AWOL from the military. But an examination of his congressional voting record might earn him the tag AWOC, or "Absent Without Courage." For McCain has shown that when it comes to the tough votes, the ones requiring him to take a stand, he adheres to the ancient philosophy espoused by Mr. Miyagi from The Karate Kid: "Best defense, no be there."
Simply put, in the first session of the 110th Congress (2007), the senator from Arizona missed, by a wide margin, more votes than any of his Senate colleagues but one, Democrat Tim Johnson, who was sidelined with a serious brain hemorrhage.
According to the Washington Post database tracking Senate "vote missers," McCain had missed a whopping 261 of 468 votes, or almost 56 percent, by March 2008. McCain is understandably busy running for president -- and all the candidates running for that highest of offices in 2008 have shown a poor record in showing up for votes. But number of votes missed is one thing; which votes you miss is another. McCain the maverick has missed votes in a way that betrays a calculated strategy: namely, to avoid going on the record when doing so would be politically risky.
On March 13, 2007, a critical roll call vote was held in the Senate on the Improving America's Security Act, which codified implementation of the 9/11 Commission recommendations for protecting America. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were there. So were then presidential candidates senators Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Joe Biden of Delaware, and Sam Brownback of Kansas. Where was John McCain? According to his official calendar, he was in California for a series of big-money fundraisers.
Did Arizona's senior senator think a key vote on protecting America wasn't important enough to make? Could it be that McCain didn't want to go against the wishes of his party and be on the record -- with 38 other Republicans -- in opposing increased security for America? McCain was the only senator, other than Tim Johnson, to miss that vote.
McCain wasn't out of town on the presidential campaign trail but was instead practicing the art of selective voting -- the art of "no be there" -- on March 23. It was a busy legislative day that saw 16 roll call votes on the floor. McCain voted dependably, right down the party line, on fifteen of those proposed votes. One might surmise that the missed vote occurred early in the morning, before McCain got to the office, or late at night, after he'd left, maybe to attend a fundraiser or get a beer with Imus.
Wrong. The vote McCain missed that day occurred right in the middle of the legislative day and between two other votes for which he was present. The one he missed was for an amendment (Amdt. 529) to provide $1.2 billion for the highly successful COPS program, an initiative that gives "local law enforcement critical resources necessary to prevent and respond to violent crime and acts of terrorism." Perhaps the issues before and after the ducked vote were not as uncomfortable for McCain. Have a look at the vote timeline for the hour in question:

It's possible that Senator McCain just happened to be in the men's room or the Senate cafeteria when vote number 110 was held. Or maybe he didn't want to be on record as voting against a provision called the Improving America's Security Act. McCain, unlike his 33 colleagues, would have to stand by that vote as a presidential candidate in 2008.
McCain found a way to miss most of the important votes on Iraq in the first part of the 110th Congress. He even bailed on a critical Iraq war briefing by General David Petraeus on April 25, 2007, so that he could campaign in New Hampshire that day.
Yet his speeches suggest complete vigilance. "We must win in Iraq. We cannot fail," said McCain in a May 2006 speech to the Utah State Republican Convention. "If we lose in Iraq, they're coming after us. We will fight them somewhere else -- like here. It's all part of a gigantic, titanic struggle between good and evil." Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took notice: "Senator McCain," Reid said through his spokesperson Liz Oxhorn in May 2007, "has spent considerable time defending the president on Iraq ... but has only managed to show up for four of the last fourteen Iraq votes."
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2008 headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 10, 2008 2:05 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's IT?
Direct Democracy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Shaddap.
Posted by: fanny666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tim Brown on Apr 10, 2008 3:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone find anything that links to this letter?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Unless I'm Mistaken...
Posted by: ragamuffin
» Maybe PNAC scrubbed his name from the letter
Posted by: trappedintwilightzone
» PNAC letter was in 2000, not 1998
Posted by: realtruther
» oops, left IRAQ out of the google search terms
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Apr 10, 2008 5:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» nope, he's going to pick a REAL republican--Lieberman
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Apr 10, 2008 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he's lying now you know he has no problem lying later.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: mars68
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: mars68
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: mars68
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 10, 2008 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 10, 2008 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His association with Bill Kristol's neofascist organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), reveals McCain for what he TRULY is: a rightwinger in moderate clothing.
To learn more about PNAC, including the names of its 225 signatories, visit the investigative website, www.FreedomCentralUSA.com.
Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, ARDENT Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 10, 2008 8:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's Lieberman of the Committee on the Present Danger, a little group of right-wing patrician fanatics headed up by Joe Lieberman, George Schultz, James Woolsey, etc. The CPD members (over 50) are also affiliates of the American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, the Project for a New American Century, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Boeing Company.
These guys are into permanent war for permanent profit, and represent the shadiest elements in U.S. politics today. That's who McCain has decided to join up with, because he's thinks that that is his route to political power. It's sad and pathetic, but that's what McCain has become.
The growing connections between McCain and the neocons, and the growing gap between the military and the neocons are discussed in this short clip from the Real News Network
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To watch him cow-tow to the bushies and neocons has been nothing short of pathetic.
The fact that approximately 50% of the population supports this guy for president is one of the most discouraging things I've heard in a long time.
A McCain presidency would be a total disaster....probably as bad as Bush or maybe even worse. HELP!
VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pennyhead on Apr 10, 2008 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted by TexasGal
on April 9, 2008, 1:24 pm
are u kidding me!!!
MCCAIN IS A WOMANNIZER!!!
HES HAD LIKE FOUR WIVES
and those women are GROSS
HOW COULD ANY OF YOU WANT MCCAIN IN OFFICE?
This could POSSIBLY BE one of the WORST presidential candidate pools ever. See what America’s Youth is saying about each of the candidates, what they have done for the campaigns and for OUR future.
www.YourThreeCents.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The Big Raven on Apr 10, 2008 11:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most elders who are in ballance with the world are "NEVER' angry or say really stupid and dumb things like this wanna-be "elder statesmen" who has never shown any real evidence of caring for others except himself or the same old "privillaged whites" that has turned washinton into who ever lobbies with the most payola wins and it ALLWAYS the same OLD whitemen who benifit from this type of phoney "wisdoom".
And if the truth be known as america votes in another crazy election and brings in this elder clown who most would not give him a second look (lack of re-spect not willing to look at twice)if america votes this senile oldman in who by the way SOLD-OUT his fellow soldiers in Vietnam (and if you do not beleive me LOOK IT UP YOUR-SELF)so he could be treated more softly the pussy spilled his guts and theres is MANY accounts of these very important interveiws he has done all the while eating better food and being treated better than any of his fellow soldiers who were really being tortured a few cells away.
On the other hand maybe america deserves this senile old fool who will push the button to save his old ass again he thinks......so sad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 10, 2008 11:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: trappedintwilightzone on Apr 10, 2008 6:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't think I'd trust PNAC as my source for ANYthing.
Between Cliff Schecter and PNAC, guess who I'm gonna believe?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» it was NOT the PNAC letter, people...
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 10, 2008 2:05 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's IT?
Direct Democracy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Shaddap.
Posted by: fanny666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tim Brown on Apr 10, 2008 3:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone find anything that links to this letter?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Unless I'm Mistaken...
Posted by: ragamuffin
» Maybe PNAC scrubbed his name from the letter
Posted by: trappedintwilightzone
» PNAC letter was in 2000, not 1998
Posted by: realtruther
» oops, left IRAQ out of the google search terms
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Apr 10, 2008 5:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» nope, he's going to pick a REAL republican--Lieberman
Posted by: realtruther
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Apr 10, 2008 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he's lying now you know he has no problem lying later.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: mars68
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: mars68
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: mars68
» RE: Lying About it Is Far More Important
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 10, 2008 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 10, 2008 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His association with Bill Kristol's neofascist organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), reveals McCain for what he TRULY is: a rightwinger in moderate clothing.
To learn more about PNAC, including the names of its 225 signatories, visit the investigative website, www.FreedomCentralUSA.com.
Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, ARDENT Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 10, 2008 8:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's Lieberman of the Committee on the Present Danger, a little group of right-wing patrician fanatics headed up by Joe Lieberman, George Schultz, James Woolsey, etc. The CPD members (over 50) are also affiliates of the American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, the Project for a New American Century, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Boeing Company.
These guys are into permanent war for permanent profit, and represent the shadiest elements in U.S. politics today. That's who McCain has decided to join up with, because he's thinks that that is his route to political power. It's sad and pathetic, but that's what McCain has become.
The growing connections between McCain and the neocons, and the growing gap between the military and the neocons are discussed in this short clip from the Real News Network
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Apr 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To watch him cow-tow to the bushies and neocons has been nothing short of pathetic.
The fact that approximately 50% of the population supports this guy for president is one of the most discouraging things I've heard in a long time.
A McCain presidency would be a total disaster....probably as bad as Bush or maybe even worse. HELP!
VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pennyhead on Apr 10, 2008 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted by TexasGal
on April 9, 2008, 1:24 pm
are u kidding me!!!
MCCAIN IS A WOMANNIZER!!!
HES HAD LIKE FOUR WIVES
and those women are GROSS
HOW COULD ANY OF YOU WANT MCCAIN IN OFFICE?
This could POSSIBLY BE one of the WORST presidential candidate pools ever. See what America’s Youth is saying about each of the candidates, what they have done for the campaigns and for OUR future.
www.YourThreeCents.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The Big Raven on Apr 10, 2008 11:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most elders who are in ballance with the world are "NEVER' angry or say really stupid and dumb things like this wanna-be "elder statesmen" who has never shown any real evidence of caring for others except himself or the same old "privillaged whites" that has turned washinton into who ever lobbies with the most payola wins and it ALLWAYS the same OLD whitemen who benifit from this type of phoney "wisdoom".
And if the truth be known as america votes in another crazy election and brings in this elder clown who most would not give him a second look (lack of re-spect not willing to look at twice)if america votes this senile oldman in who by the way SOLD-OUT his fellow soldiers in Vietnam (and if you do not beleive me LOOK IT UP YOUR-SELF)so he could be treated more softly the pussy spilled his guts and theres is MANY accounts of these very important interveiws he has done all the while eating better food and being treated better than any of his fellow soldiers who were really being tortured a few cells away.
On the other hand maybe america deserves this senile old fool who will push the button to save his old ass again he thinks......so sad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 10, 2008 11:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: trappedintwilightzone on Apr 10, 2008 6:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't think I'd trust PNAC as my source for ANYthing.
Between Cliff Schecter and PNAC, guess who I'm gonna believe?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» it was NOT the PNAC letter, people...
Posted by: realtruther
MoveOn Launches Campaign for Bold Progressive Reforms as the Obama Era Begins
Obama's Promise of Change Comes Wrapped in Red, White and Blue
Reactions to Obama's Historic Moment From Around the Globe




