Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

The Audacity of Populism

By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. Posted April 7, 2008.


If Obama convinces white working-class voters that he cares about their economic plight, he will become the 44th President of the United States.
Advertisement

Eighty-one percent of Americans now agree that "things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track," the most since this question has been asked and a remarkable preponderance of pessimism by any comparison.

And this recession is only beginning; real home prices have dropped only about 13 percent, since peak) after rising 70 percent (in real, inflation-adjusted terms) from trend levels until mid-2006. There is a long way to go before we see a sustained recovery.

The combination of a long, deeply unpopular war and what looks like it will be the worst recession in at least 25 years -- and possibly much longer -- carries the potential for serious political upheaval. It would take political incompetence of the highest order for the Democrats not to score significant gains in Congress and win the presidency in November.

But first Barack Obama, the likely Democratic candidate, has to clinch the nomination. The experts agree that if he wins Pennsylvania on April 22, the race will be effectively over.

His major obstacle is the race issue, and this will probably be true for the general election. The white working-class voters that will swing Pennsylvania in the Democratic primary will probably also be the swing voters in the general election (if it turns out to be a close election). The whole flap about Obama's pastor, Jeremiah A. Wright, was mainly a means of introducing race into the campaign.

Obama's brilliant speech on March 18, which confronted the issue head-on, elevated the level of discussion and managed to win high praise from both the New York Times (which had endorsed Clinton) and the Washington Post (an early and strong supporter of the Iraq war) editorial boards. This was no mean feat. But there is only a limited amount of education about race and racism that can take place during an election campaign -- in fact we may have already seen most of it.

The Democrats have not taken the majority of the white vote in a presidential election in 44 years. After the civil rights movement had won its victories in voting rights and other institutional changes in the 1960s, President Nixon's "Southern Strategy" molded the white backlash into a semi-permanent electoral majority for the Republican Party. President Reagan launched his 1980 campaign with a speech in Philadelphia, Mississippi -- a place most known for the murder of three civil rights workers in the 1964. The speech was about "states' rights," long known to Southern whites as code for racial segregation. It was no coincidence, and Reagan's other coded messages about such concepts as "welfare queens," helped to consolidate the Republicans' political niche as the "white people's party." It is rarely talked about here, but similar phenomena in poorer countries are often referred to as "tribalism."

But there is one way that Obama can reach those white working class voters who are currently -- without consciously recognizing that it might have something to do with race -- groping for excuses not to vote for him. It may be old fashioned, but he can appeal directly to their class interests. He has moved in that direction since losing these voters in Ohio and elsewhere. In Pennsylvania, he is talking about how he has "met too many workers who have to compete with their teenage kids for jobs at the local fast-food joint that pay $7, $8 an hour because they lost their pension and their health care."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: class, race, election 2008, recession, obama

Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 7, 2008 7:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, we will


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Apr 7, 2008 8:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am truly stunned that any median and under income worker needs convincing to vote for any populist candidate...but then again, I was stunned and heartbroken from the last election...when I knew it was all over and they had the chance to finally bring all of the ruin to our country that they had planned. And it has happened.

How low do things have to go before anyone needs convincing? Mr. Obama could start to heal us if he were given the chance. He could take back this country from the looting plutocracy...if given the chance. He could restore family values by ensuring that unions have the strength to avoid the subprime wages that have victimized the average American. And he might be able to do something about the subprime education system we have now...which doesn't teach what we really need to know - how to avoid being taken in by sophistry, advertising, cunningly manufactured pleas by business for lower and lower taxes...how not to buy the trickle down mantra....that is what we need from schools first. And how to manage ones real finances - not the finances they try to convince us we have so that we run up insane debts that keep lining their pockets.

If things get bad enough then maybe the voters just will have had enough. We can only hope to save this country from four more devastating years of the same looting and artificial inflation of assets such as homes which only benefit investors and Wall Street. And maybe we can finally consider some policies that incorporate real family values - like family friendly work hours...long vacations such as what Europe has, universal health care, and so many other benefits we have long been denied because we are not among the plutocrats. We can only hope the voters will turn to a populist when the last bit of hope has been shredded by the looters...when their power has been turned off....when their home has been foreclosed upon...and when they have been laid off from their jobs. We can only hope that someone offering hope will be elected - and none too soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: dave1616
» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: CommonDreamer
coke vs. new coke
Posted by: Spot on Apr 8, 2008 12:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
obama brands himself with the future:
change
hope

hillary brands herself with the past:
experience
a proven fighter

so what happens when voters decide they're sick of the past and want a new vision of the future?

we'll find out on april 22.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They only call it class warfare...
Posted by: Philip Newton on Apr 8, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...when we start shooting back.

It took the Great Depression to make the Great Society.

It may take another to get us back to the main levers of power we have: the ballot, the union hall and, by God, the bowling alley.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uh...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 8, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you mean the MENDACITY of populism? I prefer Obama over all other candidates still in the race, but lets face it... he is a politician just like all the rest. A bit better, perhaps.. but still a politician.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uh... Posted by: mnascimento
» RE: Uh... Posted by: willymack
» RE: Uh... Posted by: Prairie Waif
too bad Obama's 'populism' smacks of 'corporate backing'...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Apr 8, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton's Scorched Earth extortion & the Judgement of Solomon

now if Americans were more into examining platforms & making populist demands, rather than screaming epithets at the competitive Democratic 'group'...
don't believe me?
...maybe it wouldn't be a contest of personalities over content.

garsh... you mean we're not supposed to just take whatever our self-serving career politicians negotiate with their corporate backers?

take a look... exactly what part of 'being at the negotiating table' have liberals missed by jumping up & down & shrieking for their politician?

why... golly... it would seem that Edwards, Kucinich & Nader all have FAR MORE POPULIST PLATFORMS... but we'd far rather scream about PEOPLE rather than their ideas...

its an US/Them competition for power, rather than the PEOPLE making demands of their candidates.

The NEGOTIATION stage of elections
during that period when candidates run for their party...
an electorate can either BE at the negotiating table.
or not.
But the corporate backers of your Democratic candidates... are negotiating.
...isn't that the negotiation stage?
when their financial backers & their electorate
negotiate
for their candidate's position?
& nobody is actually negotiating unless:
...they make demands
...& demonstrate intention & power.
Exactly what sort of POWER does the electorate have over Obama & Clinton?

Exactly what sort of desire to negotiate do the people demonstrate these days?
nothing. The Electorate is rolling over & squealing, "oh! wonderful, whatever you say sounds good to me! I sure hope you mean it!"

Exactly WHAT about that is a negotiation?
...that simply leaves the candidates to haggle with their corporate backers & party 'sell outs' for **what they can get away with**.
Nader is showing you what nobody is willing to put on the Table & asking, "are you serious? you don't even want to TALK about it??"
& the Democrats want to snivel their preferred Personality Cult unfairly treated...

...getting good at that, aren't they?

Who the hell managed to convince Americans that the Revolution for Human Rights was... won? because, they certainly managed to figure out how to turn what could have *been* something... into a pack of self-centred & frightened wannabes.

More Deadly than Berlin Wall: Mexico-US Border Immigration Policy Brief on Humanitarian Crisis at the Border

~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Audacity of Populism
Posted by: starrboogie on Apr 9, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great Article! Does Obama (si se puede) read Alternet. Mark, please get it in his hands. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'Bama won't bite the hand that funds him
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 9, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But he needs to do more. He needs to convince these voters that he will do everything in his power to protect them from the impact of this recession. He should say: "Enough already with the billions of our tax dollars going to the bankers and the homebuilders and the greedy, irresponsible, super-rich people who got us into this mess." He can promise he will fight for legislation that would ensure that no homeowner who can pay the current rental value of their home -- now generally much less than their mortgage payment -- will be evicted.

Um... if he did that he'd get his funding cut from those very same super-rich...

Since I've already lost my crappy overpriced predatorily sub-primed condo, any "reforms" now are meaningless to me unless they're retroactive. My attitude now, fuck the rich pricks! All I want know is fuckin' revenge.

It takes all my strength these days not to resort to mountain behavior and start slashin' tires and burnin' out rich folks' barns, dammit.

One of these days, rich boy's gettin' his come-uppance. Obama better take heed along with the rest of 'em. I won't hold my breath for a politician's promise... holds about as much water with me as the predatory sub-prime mortgage broker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Response to Mr Weisbrot:
Posted by: Andie927 on Apr 9, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Mr. Weisbrot,

I usually enjoy your posts on Economics very much. This one makes no sense, unless your suggesting Obama lie about his intentions, to get elected. He, nor the economic advisor's he choose, are NOT Populists, or even Progressive! Even Paul Krugman, said: 'Obama is Right of Hillary on economic issues'.

In an article in 'The Nation', magazine titled 'Subprime Obama' by fraser:
www.thenation.com/doc/20080211/fraser
The author, names Obama's three chief economic advisers, as Austan Goolsbee, a major critic of the movie, "Sicko". David Cutler, who thinks 'high healthcare costs are good for Wall St.', and the Best for last, Jeffery Liebman, who has a full scale plan, for establishing 'Private Retirement Accts.' by reducing the money going into Social Security (6%), and cutting benefits for Everyone by 45%!!

Obama supporters may think his speech about Rev. Wright was 'The Cat's Meow!", I as a neutral party, can tell you I wasn't impressed. I don't listen to hard-core right wing radio, I listen to C-Span, and Politico when AAR is boring (a lot lately). They, the right wingers can't wait for Obama to get the nomination to start in on Obama about Wright! They have a point.

I am a firm believer in Seperation of Church and State, I don't care, don't want to know, what people do in their bedroom, or their church! (As long as it's not illegal) That said:
Obama PUT Rev. Wright on his Political Campaign! That makes him, and his speeches, past, and present 'fair game'. It is/was Hate Speech! No other way to look at it. He was fanning the flames, of old wrongs, 'all done by Whitey', to the Black man! Talk about Racist!

Our, government has done a LOT of horrible things to a LOT of people! Black and white, and red, and yellow! I don't like any of it! We have Affirmative Action, it's helped many people of color, there's the NAACP, the NegroCollegeFund, (we don't have a Caucasion College Fund), There were a lot of white people in those marches for Civil Rights! I wish we had done as much for our indiginous people!

If the People of this country, (including you) wanted a Populist/Progressive maybe we all should have done more to keep John Edwards in the race! I've turned to the only other option left, The Green Party! They take no corporate money, have a written party platform, which includes single-payer healthCARE (not insurance), Media Reform, Instant Run-off elections, Bring OUR jobs home, Regulating Corporations, ect.! Check it out, you might be impressed! I was.

His Answer was: He Supports the Green Party!!!

Country Before Party***Go Green (Party)***votesmart.org***

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ideology versus practical application Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» who isn't vague on the economy? Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» We've been through this before Yellow Posted by: ReallyBearish
» you have yer head up yer ass again Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
More than a Day Late and a Dollar Short
Posted by: patsy6 on Apr 9, 2008 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who believes in a healthy, thriving working class in America should have voted for John Edwards or Dennis Kucinich in their primaries/caucuses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple Math
Posted by: lifeaholic on Apr 10, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
13,000 GDP

10,000 Total National Income

9,000 Total consumer spending

3,000+ two wars Budget

30% Income to Finance budget

33% Spending to Finance budget

HOW DO YOU WANT TO FINANCE THE BUDGET?

1980-575B Budget
2009-3000B + two war budget

1980-1000 B Debt
2009-10,000B Debt

Twenty years of "Conservatism"

Tax & Spend=Pay Your Way

Spend & Borrow=Kids pay tomorrow

clarence swinney@bellsouth.net
vey proud Liberal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Donates and HOW MUCH?
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Apr 10, 2008 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is is kiddies!

The CANDY STORE of who gave what to whom and when (the WHY is an investigative reporters sojourn).

This URL site provides you the opportunity to check Candidate contributions and check out where they are coming from by State, Zip Codes, Professions, Contribution Amounts and the combinatronics of such.

Enjoy!

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/
2008-presidential-candidates
/finance/search/?
last_name=&first_name=
&employer=&occupation=
&zipcode=&recipient=
barack-obama&date_from_year=
2007&date_from_month=
1&date_from_day=
1&date_to_year=
2008&date_to_month=
4&date_to_day=
10&at_least=
10&up_to=500

I wish I new how to figure out the Linked text, I have tried it several times and fail each time. SO, from the bottom up, remove the line break to create the very lengthy URL address.
***************
********************************

*Clinton*
$10-500 160,095 Contributors = $26,466,392
$500-2,300 74,550 Contributors = $108,478,386

*Obama*
$10-500 359,400 Contributors = $49,960,147
$500-2,300 82,215 Contributors = $98,548,184
******************
******************

*McCain*
$10-500 102,576 Contributors = $15,438,599
$500-2,300 33,767 Contributors = $43,509,882


Waif
Prairiewaif@hotmail.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: URLs and links Posted by: SayBlade
Obama
Posted by: CatDad on Apr 13, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's comment about working class PA. voters being bitter and seeking refuge in guns and religion doesn't bode well...The corporate media and the Right Wing infrastructure will pounce on anything it can to undermine Obama and/or to keep the Hillary/Obama cat fight going.

2008 should have been a banner year for the Democrats....yet as Micheal Moore has pointed out....Democrats are professional losers....By "reaching out to Republicans" and taking corporate dollars..they have lost their soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

but first...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Apr 13, 2008 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
working-class voters need to care about their OWN economic plight...if they did the three "candidates" at the top of the presidential "race" wouldn't be the top candidates...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

how to create those jobs
Posted by: mwildfire on Apr 14, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite Obama's history, I think there is a chance he would do what the country needs; there is no chance whatsoever that either McCain or Hillary would abandon their wealthy backers to enact populist reforms.
I agree that Obama needs to spread a more explicit populist message now for political reasons, and then go beyond it when in office. Among the prescriptions here was a government-backed jobs creation program: my main point here is that the nature of this work is perfectly clear: we desperately need to move toward a carbon-free energy system before oil is unaffordable and the sky so full of greenhouse gases that our children will have no livable future at all. Even without breakthroughs, we already have the technology to do this--but if we leave the transition to the market it will happen way too slowly, way too late. We turned our economy around on a dime once, to gear up for World War II; and Hitler was a real menace, but what we face today is a threat of much greater magnitude, if unfortunately less visibility. Right now Obama is championing the wrong "solutions"--nukes, biofuels and "clean coal"--and perhaps he can't afford to alienate Big Coal and Big Corn right now. People need to realize that a politician who puts forth a perfect, truly progressive platform will suffer the fate of the one who just did so, Dennis Kucinich, who was ridiculed and marginalized out of the race by the media--ALL of the media including virtually all of the supposedly progressive media. Maybe it was because he was short and vegan and all that, but I think those things were merely convenient for the forces of marginalization. Paul Wellstone could not have been so easily marginialized, and oh gee, we'll never find out how he could do in a presidential campaign because he died in a suspicious plane crash. It probably is not possible to get into the White House while speaking as a full-fledged populist. But once there, one has the power to do at least some of what needs to be done--look at FDR.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i can't believe
Posted by: Joe on Apr 14, 2008 9:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people are actually looking forward to being pets of the government. do you envy the lives of your dogs and cats that much? i thought people took pride in being the masters of their own destiny.

oh well sign me up for some of the premium alpo, barack (hillary and mccain). i also want a back rub and some nice furry doggie socks. this election and the amount of money taken out of my check each week is giving me more motivation to jump ship. im still young and able.

that hacked copy of rosetta stone i have is going to come in handy.

what the hell i look like continuing to pay for baby boomers continuing experimentations with my life and money and their phuck ups.

young folks take note. these old phucks are never going to die and will continue to be the voting majority. in other words your life will forever be in their hands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Timidity of Obama
Posted by: Blueprelude on Apr 15, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is only now, since Pennsylvania and Ohio, starting giving voters a populist message. This is because he was a staunch free-trade neoliberal in earlier days, a member of the Brookings Institute's Hamilton Project. If he was sincere in his concern with the plight of the rust-belt unemployed, he would have circulated that message long before now. His tardiness in putting it out now makes trusting him on populist issues harder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jack
Posted by: Jackdemocracy08 on Apr 30, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Sen. Hillary Clinton has ‘managed’ to take the Pennsylvania state, the Democratic race for nomination is very much alive – and most likely to be decided by superdelegates. Nevertheless.. Indiana ,Idaho and West Virginia are still to come.

If you’re tired of waiting around for those super delegates to make a decision already, go to LobbyDelegates.com and push them to support Clinton or Obama

If you haven't done so yet, please write a message to each of your state's superdelegates at http://www.lobbydelegates.com


It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Obama in office?!

Sending a note to current Obama supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Clinton supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Obama, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Obama. It's that easy...

Clinton Supporters too …. !

It takes a moment, but what's a few minutes now worth to get Clinton in office?!

Sending a note to current Clinton supporters lets them know it's appreciated, sending a note to current Obama supporters can hopefully sway them to change their vote to Clinton, and sending a note to the uncommitted folks will hopefully sway them to vote for Clinton. It's that easy...

REALLY easy to identify the superdelegates and reach out to them! It includes a list of names, addresses, and affiliations of superdelegates from each state including your state

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]