Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

In Bed with Lobbyists: Just Another Day at the Office for McCain

By Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake. Posted February 22, 2008.


Why is everyone so surprised by McCain's connections to lobbyists? His current campaign chair is none other than uber-lobbyist Rick Davis.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

St. John McVain has a dirty little secret. The vaunted "maverick" Senator who works tirelessly against corruption and undue lobbyist interest in Washington?

Sham. He's been in bed with lobbyists for quite some time.

Why do I say that? Well, there's this: McCain's campaign staff had more lobbyists on it than any other back in June. And, after the staff massacre in July, the person he hired to be his new campaign manager (resurrecting his position from the failed 2000 campaign)? Uber-lobbyist Rick Davis. Who is Rick Davis? Try this on for starters:
So now that very same Rick Davis will be taking over as campaign manager. Who is he? Fittingly for the most lobbyist-infested campaign in the race (on either side), Davis is yet another lobbyist. Davis founded Davis, Manafort & Freedman, Inc., through which he served clients ranging from Nigerian dictator Gen. Sani Abacha to "mafia-like" Argentine legislator Alberto Pierri. Davis has had a long association with McCain -- one tangled up in webs of special influence. In 1999, while Davis was working for McCain, two of his firm's clients, COMSAT and SBC, "had major (and controversial) mergers pending before the Federal Communications Commission in 1999, and both mergers were approved." The FCC was under the legislative oversight authority of McCain's Commerce Committee, yet McCain refused to recuse himself from the proceedings.
Davis was also a central figure in McCain's Reform Institute scandal, an under-reported affair in which the "Maverick" Senator used a nonprofit, tax-exempt "reform" organization to trade political favors for corporate cash.
Think this is a new development for St. McVain? That his scramble to win the GOP presidential nomination at all costs came at the price of climbing into bed with some DC lobbyists, that besmirching his otherwise squeaky clean, burnished image of integrity is a recent phenomenon? Think again:
In 2000, when McCain set out to seek the Republican Party's presidential nomination, his campaign charter jet landed in New Hampshire early on with some lobbyists aboard.
David Broder, dean of the political writers, was aboard that plane. And he duly noted the presence of Ken Duberstein, the lobbyist and former chief of staff for Ronald Reagan, aboard the plane of the senator running as the anti-establishment candidate.
Yours truly was on that plane, too, and duly noted the presence of Tom Panza, a Florida-based lobbyist for GTech, the lottery-management company that has mopped up contract after contract in the states running lotteries and provided lucrative employment for a lot of former state workers in the process.
blockquote>
Bush won, McCain lost, and now McCain is back again, seeking the 2008 nomination -- with some lobbyists in tow again.
Funny how Rove came up with a line of attack against McVain that centered around his chairmanship of the Commerce Committee. One wonders how it is that the NYTimes story came to be seeded by multiple former McCain staffers. But I digress ...

As Attaturk highlighted this morning, one of the McCain camps chief mouthpieces on this story has been Charlie Black. You know good ole Charlie, don't you?
Charlie Black, a lobbyist who is a senior strategist for the McCain campaign, said he's so often involved in presidential campaigns that he considers lobbying his "second career."
"Most lobbyists who devote a lot of time to it are politicos who did that before they got into lobbying," said Mr. Black, who worked for former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush and now lobbies for AT&T, lottery contractor Gtech and General Motors.
Funny how all that telecom money seems to be swimming around the yacht parties that McVain frequented, jetting down on private planes to hobnob with the influence peddling crowd he calls friends and staffers, isn't it? From several telecom lobbyists to the WaPo:
Three telecom lobbyists and a former McCain aide, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that Iseman spoke up regularly at meetings of telecom lobbyists in Washington, extolling her connections to McCain and his office. She would regularly volunteer at those meetings to be the point person for the telecom industry in dealing with McCain's office.
Concern about Iseman's presence around McCain at one point led to her being banned from his Senate office, according to sources close to McCain. Senior McCain aide Mark Salter, in an e-mail, denied that Iseman was ever barred from the office or was even a frequent presence there ...
In the years that McCain chaired the commerce committee, Iseman lobbied for Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson, the head of what used to be Paxson Communications, now Ion Media Networks, and was involved in a successful lobbying campaign to persuade McCain and other members of Congress to send letters to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Paxson.
In late 1999, McCain wrote two letters to the FCC urging a vote on the sale to Paxson of a Pittsburgh television station. The sale had been highly contentious in Pittsburgh and involved a multipronged lobbying effort among the parties to the deal.
At the time he sent the first letter, McCain had flown on Paxson's corporate jet four times to appear at campaign events and had received $20,000 in campaign donations from Paxson and its law firm. The second letter came on Dec. 10, a day after the company's jet ferried him to a Florida fundraiser that was held aboard a yacht in West Palm Beach.
Much, much more on this to come ... you can bet on it.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: lobbyists, mccain, election 2008, rick davis, campaign finance reform

Christy Hardin Smith blogs daily at the FireDogLake blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Gee. What a Surprise.
Posted by: farmertx on Feb 22, 2008 3:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That any politician would cater to lobbyist's and/or seek favor with them, is almost a given.
When one considers that we allow bribing of politician's in plain sight through campaign contributions involving millions of dollars.
I remember the faint light at the end of the tunnel (when Pelosi promised to clean up ethics) and then found out it was the headlight of the Southbound fast freight (when she promptly went to collect at a $10,000/plate dinner).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For more details this Politico.com article digs into the lobbying specifics
Posted by: johnh on Feb 22, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Politico.com story gives a detailed view on the effects of the lobbyist on the particular legislation and McCain:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8616.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political nascar idea
Posted by: ankhet on Feb 22, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know what ought to become a rule? Making the political candidates wear suits like those of he nascar drivers - plain blue or red jumpsuits with badges from all, I mean ALL, of the of the corporate sponsors all over them. Their vehicles also should be emblazoned with logo stickers from their corporate supporters.

It's only fair and just.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Political nascar idea Posted by: Lauren
NO MAJOR SHOCK
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 22, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it does explain why McCain never fought back when Bush lied about the bi-racial child in 2000. McCain should have turned ugly on Bush, but he didn't. I always wondered why since the story as told by Bush wasn't true. But McCain had other skeletons in the closet that were true. The Times did him a favor getting this out before someone else did. The story doesn't appear to have done any damage. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dont look now but...
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 22, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't that Clinton standing at the lobby door which 99% of the democrats and republicans.. Does one think that Obama isnt calling it like it is with Israel because he loves them???.. $$$$$$$$$ for everyone! democrat and republican alike.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dont look now but... Posted by: sofla100
» RE: dont look now but... Posted by: carbon-based
Let's try pro-populist Progressive VIGILANTEs for a change.
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 22, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we're all going to have to take the laws and the Constitution into our own hands to fight the uber-corruption in Washington before we can afford to let go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Defense versus (Wall Street or the Big Banks) - Another Fake Election
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 22, 2008 3:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain is a GWB with a little bit of brains. He knows the script he is suppose to follow well. He is underwritten by his wealthy benefactors. Especially the defense and war industries. Obama is underwritten by Wall Street and Hillary by the big banks. So, this election really boils down to defense vs. (Wall Street or the Big Banks). Now, which one do you prefer? That's really the choice, well, it might not even be the choice. Ultimately, if defense strikes a deal with either Wall Street or the Banks, that will determine who the Dems run. As for the election, the same thing. Only in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 22, 2008 5:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We already know that we're not going to vote for John McCain. Ignore him and concentrate on rolling back the Bush agenda on January 20, 2009.


Direct Primaries!

Direct Elections!

Direct Democracy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McVain
Posted by: leafsong1 on Feb 23, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typo or nickname?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement