Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

Is a Liberal Renaissance in the Making?

By David Michael Green, AlterNet. Posted February 17, 2008.


This election should bring some optimism after years of right-wing dominance.
Advertisement

American politics sucks, doesn't it?

C'mon, face it - you know it does. You know 'cause you've experienced it your whole life. You (and I) have made a career out of sitting there watching in helpless astonishment as dweebs like Mike Dukakis and John Kerry stood by hopelessly looking on in election after election, while crypto-fascist punks like Dick Nixon and Little Bush handed them their lunch. Only then to go on and rack up nearly as much damage in the world as imaginable, while using hate and divisiveness to maintain support at home. Right?

Your whole life teaches you that to be a progressive in America is to make Sisyphus look like a slacker. Hey, at least he got to the top of the mountain once in a while! Even if it was all for naught, that's still a lot more than we've been getting across the better part of a lifetime. Right?

And yet…

Maybe -- just maybe -- the long regressive winter of American politics is coming to a close. And maybe -- just maybe -- it is doing so with the extra kicker of a righteous wrath bringing its fury down on those most deserving of a generation's worth of rage and contempt.

If you think I've gone off my rocker into a naive Wonderland so absurd that it would make Neville Chamberlain squeamish, try on this little thought experiment to see what I mean. Cast yourself back to the dark days of 2003 or 2004. The country has gone off on some 9/11-induced mass hysteria making Salem look like a picnic. The dumbest and the meanest amongst us are in charge. They are telling palpable, demonstrable lies about imaginary enemies, and the public is rallying behind their insane plans for Armageddon (in some cases quite literally), even (s)electing them for a second term. Their job approval ratings have skyrocketed to 90 percent. They are demonizing as traitors anyone who even feebly disagrees with them, even as they shred every major provision of the Constitution all claim to revere. And very few do dare to disagree with them -- certainly not leaders of the completely misnamed opposition party. They are on a roll, fueled by a religious-like (and religious) fervor, and it looks like there is no end in sight. Remember?

Cast yourself back to that time, and ask what you could have reasonably imagined -- back then -- for February of 2008? What could you have reasonably dreamed of for this moment, back in those dark days? What would have been fair to expect with all that as predicate?

Could you have imagined that George W. Bush would become a hated and reviled president, widely despised by the same public that once gave him 90 percent approval? Could you imagine that the Republican Party would be in tatters and that -- with an irony more delicious than any gourmet meal -- Bush himself would be the architect of his own party's undoing? Could you imagine the principles of Bushism completely rejected by an angry and sobered (pun fully intended) American public?

Could you have imagined anything as perfect as the tale of Mitt Romney? A guy who told every lie imaginable to shamelessly and embarrassingly slobber all over the freaks who still control his party, only to lose anyhow? Could you have hoped to see this weenie would drop $40 million of his own hard-stolen cash in order to get stomped by what passes for a 'liberal' in the Republican Party? Could you have hoped for an irony as rich as watching the party of religious intolerance dump this smarmy turd because his Mormonism was too scary to even this lot of nutty zealots? Could anything be better than to see the door smack this guy in the ass on his way out, after saying in his surrender speech "We need to teach our children that before they have babies, they get married", and "I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror" by staying in and helping the Democrats to win? Do desserts come more just than that?

Could you have imagined a guy running for president of 9/11 actually getting unceremoniously dumped by his party, despite talking about that day incessantly? True, it would have been slightly better if Giuliani had hung around longer in order to more fully expose his serial divorces, his public extramarital sexual affairs, his marriage to his cousin, his children's hatred for their dad, his record of arrogance and ugliness as mayor of New York and his legion of Bernie Kerik connections. But hey, most of that is fully out now, and Giuliani's price on the lecture circuit has literally plummeted while he stands naked and utterly rejected, even by the scary monsters of the GOP. I can work with that.

Could you have imagined the once fearsome Republican Party machine being blasted to bits, with all the junior high kids running it turning in on each other and viciously attacking their brethren? Could you have hoped that they would nominate someone for president that they basically hate and don't trust? Could you have dreamed that certifiables like Ann Coulter and James Dobson would say that they'd campaign for Hillary before they'd support John McCain, the very nominee they're stuck with? And wouldn't it really have been too much to ask for to have a guy named Huckabee stick around in the race, embarrassing the supposed heir apparent?

Could you have wished that to win the GOP nomination the successful candidate would have to tack way to the right of an American public that is moving rapidly the other way? And that -- because having done so still fails miserably to placate his own base -- he'll be unable to tack toward the center after securing that nomination? And that McCain will very likely have to pick someone far more conservative than himself -- and therefore less attractive to most voters -- as a running mate in order just to get his own voters to drag themselves out to the polls in November?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election08

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University. He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at www.regressiveantidote.net.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
retired
Posted by: vertglnt on Feb 17, 2008 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Putting down Dukakis, Kerry and Edwards is unhelpful. They were far more desirable candidates than the alternatives in their respective presidential races (this does not apply to Edwards). At present I support Obama, but if Clinton should be the candidate of the Democratic party I will certainly support her in infinte preference to anything the right is capable of offering, including Ron Paul.
For that reason, those of us who yearn for a liberal revival, or even just to get rid of Bushism, should refrain from denunciations of Clinton which could come back to haunt us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yes but...
Posted by: wwittman on Feb 17, 2008 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be nice if any Democrat running was actually a LIBERAL?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yes but... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: yes but... Posted by: foreverhope
I agree with you 100%! GREAT ARTICLE!
Posted by: foreverhope on Feb 17, 2008 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"My cousin, Dick Cheney, won't be on this ballot."

That is one more thing to admire about Obama, he has a brilliant sense of humor!

Thank you so much David for this fantastic article. You say it all perfectly. I haven't seen anything like this since 1968! It is reviving this worn out old heart of mine. I am so tired of naysayers, fear-mongers, spoilers, hopeless cynics.

I was in my kitchen a few weeks ago, very ambivalent about the election, resigned to Hillary as the party favorite, no one else could possibly beat her, but very ambivalent, not enthusiastic, not willing to work on her campaign. Only willing to vote, ONCE AGAIN, for the lesser or two evils.

UGGGGG....ARRRGGHHHH....do you know how sick the American people are of voting for the lesser of two evils? I believe it is PRECISELY WHY people have given up voting! Dear Lord, we barely have a democracy at all anymore! And PLEASE! The White House controlled by TWO families for over two decades? No, I didn't like that a bit. The Clinton's bothersome for many reasons.

So, in my kitchen, tv on, only half listening, and Obama speaking. And all of a sudden! I was really hearing him! and I had goose bumps run up and down my arms and legs! and I thought to myself, OMG! he sounds just like Robert Kennedy. Bobby Kennedy, the man that inspired what I would do with my own life when I was 17-years-old 40 years ago. JFK too, but more Bobby for me. Now Barack definately had my full attention BIG TIME. I knew I was hearing someone very special.

Two weeks later Caroline and other Kennedy's agreed with me, that was very cool to me, lol...and I thought, this is good.

Since then my enthusiasm has only grown as I have listened to him and learned more about him. Any doubts I may have had about Barack being just another very ordinary but charismatic and charming politician have been put to rest the more I have learned. I agree, Obama is a transformational leader, like Reagan was for the right but taking us the other way.

He is a remarkable man, these are remarkable times, what is happening is remarkable. Barack Obama is unique, brilliant and dynamic. He is the real deal, he is everything you said David, and then some. He is not perfect, he doesn't claim to be, no one is! But he IS outstanding in many many ways, as well as profoundly compelling.

IMO, Barack's compelling way of speaking, what others diminish as only words, are EXACTLY what this country needs at exactly the right time in the history of this country. People are tired of PLASTIC, fixed smiles, vacant eyes, old rhetoric, boring talking points, canned speeches. I am thanking the dems lucky stars every day.

I have every confidence Obama will be not only the party nominee, he will also be the next President of the United States. If his campaign is any indication of his presidency I believe he will be a great one. I predict the new voters he is bringing into the democratic party and into the democratic process will sweep other dems to victory in the Congressional and Senate races this November!

Along with everything else Obama brings to the table his ability to inspire is only the icing on an otherwise splendid cake. And so, at least or me, it IS about Obama, and it is ALSO about his message. He's what America WANTS to be.


YES WE CAN SAY NO TO 100 MORE YEARS
VOTE OBAMA '08 FOR CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

falling into the MSM language trap
Posted by: skydog on Feb 17, 2008 7:36 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This isn't a "liberal" resurgence any more than opposing the Iraq occupation is a "liberal" position when 70 percent of Americans want an end to this madness.

This is in fact a centrist resurgence. Most Americans are what the MSM mistakenly but purposefully calls "liberal." And clearly, most means center of political thought.

And that's unambiguously and provably: liberal is but a label, but centrist we can count. It's quantifiable. And a wise man once said, "There's nothing as devastating to an opinion as a number."

Let's not fall into the trap of adopting the language of the enemy who has had their thumb on the scale since Reagan rescinded the Fairness Doctrine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh heaven's to Betsy! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Oh heaven's to Betsy! Posted by: LeeAnnG
» adopt our own definition Posted by: foreverhope
Liberal Renaissance
Posted by: mahdee on Feb 18, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for that article. David Michael Green is quite a writer. Fresh and sincere. I will look forward to more from him.

I love reading what someone has written that has been stewing in the underbelly of my own mind for so long. He aptly puts floodlights where there were only candles. Nice work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liberal renaissance?
Posted by: robbb3rt on Feb 18, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't "Liberal" and "renaissance" sort of redundant?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not quite Posted by: LeeAnnG
Viva la revolucion
Posted by: liberalibrarian on Feb 18, 2008 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David Michael Green--
Well done.

We do need stay on point about the real reason people are so passionate about either Hillary (in their own way and for their own reasons) and the swell of enthusiasm for Obama. I may not be quite ready to ride the bandwagon of Obama, but really, really want the evil, theocratic, warmongering, fundamentalist factions of this country gone. Gone for good.

Thanks for inviting us to say a little grace for the "hoisting by their own petard". A UU amen to that.

Liberal Librarian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Don't Know
Posted by: pdxstudent on Feb 19, 2008 11:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'd think that if this were a liberal renaissance, which is to say a soft version of a revolution, the true Leftist rallying phrase, then the liberals would have come out in greater numbers for the two most liberal candidates (formerly) running for the democratic nomination: John Edwards and Dennis Kucinich.

Is it fair to say that we are witnessing a move from the center to the left? I don't know, but I don't think so. 8 years of Bush has just made the Center feel alot more liberal than it would like to think it is. In other words, insofar as liberal is relative to what's conservative, then anything moving away the conservative end of the spectrum is moving towards the liberal. That doesn't mean we're witnessing a true populist movement or a rise in liberal inclination of most Americans, who are by and large conservative, just a re-centering of sorts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]