Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

What Will Obama Do When There's No Hillary Firewall?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, deleted. Posted February 14, 2008.


Blinded by hatred for Hillary, the Right has not paid much attention to Obama. That will quickly change if he gets the nomination.
Advertisement

The British newspaper the Daily Squib's tongue-in-cheek fake news report that Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Ron Edwards endorsed Democrat Presidential contender Barack Obama drew chuckles, sneers, and cracks. There was, of course, no such endorsement. But the reason it drew some press attention and momentary belief made perfectly good sense. The dummied up endorsement had nothing to do with any sudden love for Obama, but rather a hatred for Hillary Clinton. The fake article trumpeted the hate Hillary crowd's favorite rallying cry -- anybody but Hillary.

The biggest beneficiary of the Hillary loathe has been Obama. Her campaign has been sufficiently subverted and sabotaged by the legions of Hillary haters to the point that it's listing. If her campaign goes down, so will Obama's Hillary firewall. The gloves will be off and it won't be pretty.

There was an early hint of the dirty stuff that will come his way. The instant that Obama announced his campaign last February, National Rifle Association executive vice-president Wayne LaPierre wasted no words when asked about Obama's strong support for a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons, and severe limits on handgun purchases during his tenure in the Illinois Senate.

He called Obama's pro-gun control stance "bad politics." LaPierre's admonition was an ominous warning that the powerful gun-lobby group would oppose Obama, and so would millions of other passionate gun owners that take their cue from the NRA.

That's just the start. His votes and views during his days in the Illinois Senate on taxes, abortion, civil liberties, civil rights, law enforcement and capital punishment have so far drawn little public attention, because of the media and a big chunk of the public's obsession with nailing Hillary. But in a head to head match up with the likely GOP presidential nominee John McCain, Republicans and conservative interest groups will surgically dissect his state Senate votes and they will find much there to pound him on.

The National Taxpayers Union will pound him for voting to impose hundreds of new taxes and fees on businesses in his last year in the state Senate. Though the tax hikes were deemed necessary to help close Illinois's crushing budget deficit, business and taxpayer interest groups screamed foul.

Obama's vote to raise taxes and his consistent pro-labor votes marked him as another tax and spend Democrat. This has been the dread label that Republicans have tagged Democratic contenders with in elections past. This always strikes an angry chord with millions of voters who equate higher taxes with government waste, inefficiency and pork barrel favoritism. And even more insidiously, equate high taxes with special interest giveaways to minorities and the poor.

Obama got a perfect rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council. In 2001, he backed legislation that restricted medical support in certain types of abortions where the fetus survives. Pro-life groups interpreted that as a vote to strengthen abortion rights.

His vote and views on choice will make him a prime target for pro-life groups. He got a zero rating from the National Right to Life Committee for voting for stem cell research, for funding abortions abroad, and against parental notification in the U.S. Senate.

Obama's pro-civil liberties votes on capital punishment and police power and the 100 percent rating he got from the ACLU won't help him dodge the soft-on-crime label on the issue of crime and punishment.

McCain and the GOP hit squads will go for the political jugular and lambaste him as an anti-police, anti-business, pro abortion, pro labor, pro-gun control, tax and spend liberal Democrat. Conservative interest groups will tar him as a liberal Democrat who will bend way over to pander to labor, minorities, and women. Obama's record on civil liberties, civil rights, abortion, and spending will endear him to millions of voters, but not in the South and the heartland states.

Then there's the personal dirty stuff. They'll hammer him for his dealings with an indicted Chicago financier, for possible conflicts of interest in other financial dealings and legislative votes, and for his fuzzy, oftentimes contradictory, statements and actions on the Iraq War and terrorism. Then there's the ultimate ploy: the race card. The GOP hit squads will dig, sift and comb through every inch of his personal life and poke through his voting record to find any hint of personal or political muck.

As long as Hillary was seen as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Obama's Teflon coat remained relatively unmarred. That will change, and change fast, if Hillary can't right the ship and quickly get back in the hunt for the nomination.

Obama knows what's in store for him without the Hillary firewall. A month ago he loudly declared that he will not be swift-boated by the GOP. He will be. The fake Klan endorsement notwithstanding, he can still thank Hillary that he hasn't been already.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: hillary clinton, right, conservatives, obama

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His forthcoming book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Blacks Acting Up Would Deminish Any Gains
Posted by: hole11 on Feb 14, 2008 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The veteran police officers dumping the handicapped white man out of his wheel chair.

"Cookie" going off on the local white city counsel people for giving him tickets doesn't set well with many locals.

Doesn't matter what Obama says or does, if the media plays some big civil war or something his chances of getting elected is near nil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing ....
Posted by: cinnie77 on Feb 14, 2008 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he hasn't seen already from our dear Clintons ... Obama will be just fine!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nothing .... Posted by: Lauren
I got faith...So does he.
Posted by: Gungneir on Feb 14, 2008 7:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama knew he was sticking his head into the figurative noose the second he announced the decision to run for President. If he's done any studying on the Clintons (and he probably can recite this power couple's history chapter and verse), he'll also have studied what the GOP did to them before they got to office and when they got to office.

In fact, I would point out that the second part is just as important as the first part. Does anybody honestly think that if Obama gets the new digs at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the GOP is going to back off? If the two decades have taught me anything, it's that they are very sore losers who are not above and beyond any dirty trick to make things go their way. Add in the fact that it would be a black man in presidential office for the first time and...well, need I go on?

But...I don't think that it bothers him. The prize is worth the pain to him. Frankly, I'm ready for somebody other than an ex-frat boy who has been disowned by the chimpanzee species to occupy the Oval Office. If he can run this gauntlet, he can make it through any Republican firestorms...probably without even singing his jacket.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I got faith...So does he. Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: I got faith...So does he. Posted by: bittershaman
Let's see if the Repubs
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Feb 14, 2008 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can turn their fire from McCain first.
Then let's see if anyone listens when they inevitably start squaking.

My guess is: not enough.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm
Posted by: RobNLA on Feb 14, 2008 10:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is right that Republicans will attack Obama with everything they can. But if Hilary's demise is any indication, the public doesn't have much patience anymore for dirty tricks. So the typical Republican tactics may end up backfiring on them badly.

Plus, a large majority of this country is really sick and tired of Bush. And McCain just represents more years of Bush policies while Obama represents change away from them. So every crappy move Bush makes before leaving office will translate into a negative against McCain's campaign.

Regardless of the distractions Republicans might pull, McCain's newfound worship of Bush policies will be his undoing. Unless of course Hillary rips off the Dem nomination, then I predict a McCain win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not quite right
Posted by: daniel1982 on Feb 14, 2008 10:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Earl missed something here. Its not only the GOP and conservatives that hate Hillary. There is a lot of hate from the independents, democrats and progressives. She has close to a 50% disapproval rating! Conservatives hate her because of the legacy of her and Bill (Bill and Hillary were 'swiftboating' opponents before it was made fashionable by Rove). Progressives hate her because she consistently sold them out. Everyone hates her because she's a clear liar and manipulator. The fake tears, or the "I was mislead on Iraq war" stance are but a drop in the bucket.

Get over it Earl. Hillary is a horrible candidate that is passionately despised by factions on the left and the right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good grief
Posted by: robertf on Feb 15, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So calling Senator Obama's position on gun control "bad politics" is "an early hint of the dirty stuff that will come his way"? It's an "ominous warning"?

I guess dissenting from his generally socialistic views and offering criticism of his record - however factual and civilly presented - just isn't fair, is it? It'll be nothing but the usual mean, hateful, race-card-playing, jugular slashing, tar flinging, swift-boating tactics of people like Wayne LaPierre, John McCain and hosts of GOP hit-squads, will it?

Good grief.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good grief Posted by: UrbanHillbilly
Personal / policitical muck doesn't equal "race card"
Posted by: mwj4c on Feb 15, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Then there's the ultimate ploy: the race card. The GOP hit squads will dig, sift and comb through every inch of his personal life and poke through his voting record to find any hint of personal or political muck."

Since when does noting one's "personal or political muck" necessarily equate with criticizing or even commenting on his race? Although I hope the two sentences quoted above are the result of a need for compressed thought in a small space, on their face, they seem to imply that one can't criticize the "personal muck" associated with a minority individual without at least being accused of racism. To say that this would chill legitimate debate is an understatement, given the power of the mere allegation of racism. Ironically, conflating a race and an individual in this way would seem to fit squarely within what the term "racism" should mean in a non-Orwellian environment.

To be sure, one can inject explicit or implicit racial invective in what would otherwise be a legitimate critique. But legitimate critiques aren't necessarily racist just because directed at a minority.

The one thing that I wholeheartedly admire about the Obama campaign has been its apparently sincere desire to dampen down and avoid unduly inflaming racial issues. I hope that all candidates and members of the electorate follow his lead in this regard.

Enjoyed the column. Regards,
mwj4c

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make no mistake
Posted by: pkricker on Feb 15, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans will go after Obama with everything they've got. Their policies and platforms are so wrong, and so transparent, that they can never win on merit. They are going to do whatever it takes to steal the election. This will include lies, slander and innuendo as well as blocking legitimate voters and corrupting the actual vote count. The Republican party and the corporate malefactors are in too deep to simply play fair and let democracy take it's course. Please people, don't get complacent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Make no mistake Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Bring it on! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Bring it on! Posted by: bittershaman
And the point is?
Posted by: Axiom69 on Feb 15, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything Earl pointed out can be applied to ANY Democratic candidate. Will the Republicans not use the same exact tactics against Hillary if she is the nominee? Will they not go after HER record? Will the NRA support Hillary? No.
This piece is just Earl trying to scare up some support for Hillary by telling us that Republicans will use dirty tactics against Obama. DUH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama
Posted by: WSHancock on Feb 15, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The mythical Democratic definition of "swiftboating" is the use of false charges to undermine a political opponent.
Since nothing the SwiftBoat vets accused John Kerry of has ever been proved false, a more accurate definition of the term would be "the use of fact to expose and refute a political opponent's self-made myth and resume"

Anyway, it is very telling that Obama and hsi supporters equate public exposure of his hyper-liberal voting record (when he managed to hit the correct voting button) to be somehow akin to "swiftboating".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually, Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: Obama Posted by: Lauren
Obama double standard
Posted by: WSHancock on Feb 15, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another thing.

When nominee Obama and his Democratic minions begin their sly attacks on John McCain's age -- as they most certainly will -- would it then be fair for the Republicans to response by addressing the fact of Obama's youth, inexperience, middle name, his race or his religion (politically calculated convenience that that most certainly is) or his extraordinarily unconvetional upbringing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama double standard Posted by: VZEQICVA
Earl's problem is..
Posted by: Drclaw on Feb 15, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...he assumes everybody that doesn't like Clinton is no more capable of reasonable analysis as he is. I've yet to see EOH actually have any discussion of Clinton policies, her hypocrtical war mongering and psuedo-patriotism (flag amendment, support for the Iranian guard congressional statement), lack of support for progressive policies unless prodded (think stimulus package), blatant free-tradism (support for the S. American free trade agreement) etc. Hey Earl-get a clue-we don't like Hillary for what she STANDS FOR! And further-if you think that Hillary's position makes her any more immune to criticsm from the right, you haven't been paying attention to the drivel that passes for rethug political discourse over the past 8 years, nor were you awake during the Clinton presidency. The attacks on Hillary will be no less vitriolic AND she well get pasted for being an egonmanical hypocrite (especially given her recent attempts to get the delegates Mich and FL caucouses (-how do you spell that anyway??)

another intellectually lazy and worthless piece from EOH.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK, IT STINKS TO LOSE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 15, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've lived by the Right Wing rules for 8 yrs. They're about to lose and can't imagine things being any other way. So Obama or Clinton will be beaten up on relentlessly. They know that. Look back on Bill Clinton. They will attempt to destroy any Democrat who wins office. They don't need a reason. It's their strategy. To a great extent, it works. So it's important for Dems to be united and to stop infighting. It's not over if we win. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sour Grapes
Posted by: newtype_alpha on Feb 15, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, don't mind Earl, he's just mad because his dream girl is slipping a bit in the primaries. To my complete lack of surprise, at the first sign that Obama MIGHT win the nomination, we get this piece from Hutchinson that roughly boils down to "Well, golly, they're only voting for Obama because they hate Hillary!"

Maybe you should make a Youtube video?
"LEAVE HILLARY ALONE!!!!!11 [[choke]][[sob]]"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sour Grapes Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: Sour Grapes Posted by: Demmom
Swiftboating is simply Telling the Truth about a Candidate
Posted by: aaCharley on Feb 15, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"McCain and the GOP hit squads will go for the political jugular and lambaste him as an anti-police, anti-business, pro abortion, pro labor, pro-gun control, tax and spend liberal Democrat."

That is exactly what the Obama campaign has promised. And what is revealed by looking at what little voting record he has created. So, it is now something to do with "hit squads" to shine the light on the candidates record. Or reveal that he does not know what he is talking about?

At least there are chocolates in Forrest Gump's box. Obama's box is simply empty. And he is promising to "Transform the World." I guess he probably could - his policies would make the whole place Third World.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

now is the time
Posted by: happyhermit on Feb 15, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to respond to snide with pride. after kerry, everyone is on guard against swiftboating, on guard against cheapshots, on guard, certainly, against any attacks on his middle name or race. let's stay on guard and respond brutally.

the republicans have "who is more conservative" contests, while the democrats have silent "i'm not too liberal" pageants. now is the time to begin to reverse this. it is a matter of public opinion, and that's something Obama can work to sway.

he should stand tall behind his more progressive votes, not apologize for them. his entire political career has been devised to come across as being as authentically neutral as possible.

we have so much momentum, screw the NRA. they're hurting america and we shouldn't be afraid of them and their bullshit smears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: now is the time Posted by: aaCharley
» ah-its now clear Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: now is the time Posted by: sekfetenmet
» RE: now is the time Posted by: Collielady
A more interesting question
Posted by: daniel1982 on Feb 16, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are blacks not voting for your Hillary? Racism or Sexism?

What do you think Earl?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A more interesting question Posted by: sekfetenmet
Sabotaged by haters??
Posted by: kimbari on Feb 18, 2008 3:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Her campaign has been sufficiently subverted and sabotaged by the legions of Hillary haters to the point that it's listing.

If her campaign could be subverted by "haters," it wasn't much of a campaign. Hillary's done a fine job of sinking herself, thank you very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And I thought _Obama_ was the white man's Black man!
Posted by: RedAaron on Feb 19, 2008 5:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's at least one of the white capitalist rulers' Black men, but compared to Mr. Hutchinson, he looks like Malcolm X!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama will be just fine if...
Posted by: Collielady on Feb 22, 2008 8:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama came from way behind Hillary by keeping with his message of positive change, while both Clintons tried the mean spirited Republican strategy. A few years ago that strategy may have worked, but the American people are now done with it. Chewing on Obama has been the undoing of Hillary's campaign.

One can only hope that the American people will reject the imminent attacks from the Republicans. If the primary season is any indicator, Obama will be just fine if he sticks with his positive message of hope and change. "Yes we can!" The country hungers for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keisha
Posted by: keisha on Feb 27, 2008 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Obama wins the nomination, I'll vote for McCain. I am a democrat and I am Black. However, I don't think that Obama is ready to be the president. This country has so many problems that need to be addressed and I don't think that Obama is ready. If he had Hillary's experience, then I'd vote for him. But, he's not ready to take on what will probably be the hardest presidency in many years. No amount of touchy feely pep talk is going to change that. We should be voting for the most qualified person and it's just that simple. I've always thought McCain was an okay guy. Yes, he's Republican, but he's an Arizona republican, which is pretty moderate. I'm a pretty moderate democrat and so I don't think we differ that much. Most importantly, the democrats lost the last two elections to a guy that is totally incompetent. I do not want the first Black president to fail. Not to mention, I don't want the next democratic president to fail because if she/he does, then we'll never get the office back because Republicans will go on and on about how it's the democrats fault for all the problems. I'd rather suffer for four more years and get a chance at another qualified candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]