Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

California's Multiracial Challenge to America

By Scott Kurashige, AlterNet. Posted February 11, 2008.


The results from the CA Dem primary show that no serious candidate for the presidency can ignore the potential of multiracial voting coalition.
Advertisement

Sixty years ago, Carey McWilliams, the well-traveled writer/activist and soon to be editor of The Nation, described California as "our nation's racial frontier." As the West Coast's multiracial makeup posed new problems and challenges, it also offered America "one more chance, perhaps a last chance, to establish the principle of racial equality." In this regard, it blessed California's residents and observers with "a ringside seat in the great theatre of the future."

In stunning fashion, the California Democratic primary signaled that the future has arrived with dramatic implications for the entire nation. There has never been an important election like this where a candidate failed to win African Americans and whites but won overall-as Clinton did in California. Once again, California flipped the script. Latinos and Asians carried Hillary to victory in California on their backs and quite likely salvaged her entire campaign. The national media has now come around to the idea of Latinos as a "sleeping giant," and the Clinton strategists deserve credit for their attentiveness to the Latino vote. While I am not holding my breath waiting for the media to overcome decades of ignorance of and marginalization of Asian Americans, the Clinton campaign has undoubtedly benefited from the significant involvement of Asian American donors, staffers, and volunteers.

This is a turning point in U.S. political history: no serious candidate for the presidency from here on out can ignore the mandate to build a multiracial coalition. Obama built an impressive biracial coalition in California, winning overwhelmingly among African Americans and splitting the white vote equally. As a result, California may help forestall the media's misguided obsession with Obama's failure to overcome the black/white racial divide. Obama may have lost, but it was not because of the "Bradley effect." Still, his defeat exposed the inadequacy of biracial thinking in the face of a multiracial reality.

Unfortunately, the pundits have already seized upon an equally divisive and reductionist theme. Interethnic relations are no longer a sideshow, but our understanding of them is severely limited. Everyone following the campaign has now read Clinton pollster Sergio Bendixen's remark, "The Hispanic voter -- and I want to say this very carefully -- has not shown a lot of willingness or affinity to support black candidates." Also surfacing less noticeably in places like online forums was the assertion that racial prejudice inhibits Asian Americans from voting for Blacks.

While prejudice and narrow-mindedness circulates in various forms within sectors of the Latino and Asian populations, crude thinking can blind us to the less sensational but more significant reasons why Clinton prevailed. She had built up a huge lead and enjoyed immense name recognition, which translated into a huge lead in absentee voting. In many places, Obama has overcome these obstacles with an excellent ground game that has attracted and energized new voters. Local observers, however, have remarked that his campaign lacked either the time or proper strategy to develop effective grassroots outreach to Latinos and Asians in California.

More than being pushed away from Obama, Asian and Latino voters were pulled to Clinton. It was during Bill Clinton's terms in office that Democrats solidified Latino and Asian "bloc votes" by paying some attention to their concerns, giving ethnic leaders a modicum of access to the party machinery, and distributing some symbolic spoils of victory. Jeff Chang helps us to understand the appeal of such "interest group" recognition to "emergent" minority groups. Hillary's campaign has elevated this recognition, such that the Asian and Latino "blocs" are now crucial to her traditional political strategy -- one that seeks to build a coalition by appealing to the self-interests of multiple constituencies, including gays and lesbians, seniors, environmentalists, and of course women as "the largest interest group." No doubt if she wins the nomination, she will hold out the promise of patronage and appointments to attempt to bring blacks as an "interest group" back into the fold.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: california, election 2008, multiracial

Scott Kurashige is an associate professor at the University of Michigan and author of The Shifting Grounds of Race: Black and Japanese Americans in the Making of Multiethnic Los Angeles (Princeton University Press, 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
new paradigm blooms
Posted by: ukeman on Feb 11, 2008 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama “should” be the president because: he represents a sea change in american society and politics that could be the salvation of the US in the global context.
White leaders can “talk” idealism, but a black man can live it; as the victim of racism who has overcome the negativism, and reaps the benefits of american resources as an american leader; not just for himself, but for american society as a whole.
This “whole” incorporates the white american culture as well as the black AND the brown; Latinos, Asians. In a perfect world idealism would prevail blind to race or color, yet in the real world, as a black american Obama is “entitled” to be a visionary leader, even more so than the Latins or Asians, who have less of a chronological history than the black race; who were enslaved into american society and geography. The foundation of the US is built on the backs of black slaves. Who more than the black man, is entitled to lead american society out of its self serving past and present; nativism aside, seen as the imperialist world grabber.
Why Obama?
Because he presents himself as the vision of hope and change; an enlightened rising above the negative consequential karma of what is worst about the US.
He acknowledges it is we the people that will gather in a movement to do just that. Many of the doubts; i.e. that he has not fleshed out his policies, or even that we are merely “projecting” our own dreams on what some say is his ambiguous siren song of idealism, give people pause... yet there seem to be more than enough supporters who say, given a closer examination of his history, of the man himself, come to the conclusion he is a man of sufficient integrity, intelligence, charisma and skill to do this.
This “pause” by the mainstream electorate is minimal given his toe to toe competition with the Clinton machine; a daunting feat to say the least; I would venture to say no other Democratic candidate could have done half as well as he is doing.

What in my opinion is a larger obstacle to Obamaʻs success, fervent Hillary supporters notwithstanding, is the apparent tunnel vision of his own race, the Afro-americans, and the Latin-americans, together who could be the strongest coalition in the US today. Their current antagonism, whether naturaly evolved from a survival mode; struggling over the same resources, as second class citizens, or even manipulated that way by the white power/money community into being pitted one against the other, is the problem. I dont think this is bogus; sure there are many idealists in all races here.
Yet as a whole, perhaps each has not had time to consider the enlightened concept of their potential as the forgivers, and thus the empowered by force of numbers, certainly not money, but sheer numbers. Obama seems to have come out of nowhere all of a sudden, propelled by a coalition of influence and youth, and now the African americans recently turned off to the Clintons due to the misteps in the South Carolina campaign.
If the Latin vote does not move to Obama, due to their interest in re-creating or re-living the golden years of prosperity for Latin americans; theʻ90s; the Clinton years, they in mere survival mode, may miss the higher, brighter larger picture, indeed global.
Asians should follow suit; as they are very similar to the Latinos in seeing blacks as competition as second class.
Truly if idealism and vision are to rise above “talk” and see the light of a global coalition of brown, black, white, and yellow (this includes all races; Polynesian, Phillipino, .. all humanity) actually leading; coalescing in a world power the likes of never before, enough of the players must see the opportunity and grab it.
Big talk; sure, but tell me the alternatives in todays world turmoil to a truly brighter future. Obama is Hawaiiʻs son and his vision transcends politics as usual.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: new paradigm blooms Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
I'm glad I kept reading!
Posted by: hagwind on Feb 11, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was getting antsy on page 1 -- "Multicultural strategy? What about multicultural substance? How about a coalition that hangs together past election day?" -- but the author nailed it at the top of page 2:

But if Clinton's multicultural strategy is unprecedented, Obama's effort to transcend "minority" politics is historic. Casting Obama as a "colorblind" politician, the pundits and his left skeptics have largely missed the significance of what he represents. Getting "beyond race" today is not about ignoring the problem of racism or moderating ones politics to appease whites.

So often the pundits and the reporters don't understand what they're seeing. This isn't all that surprising, because often the significance of events doesn't become apparent until later. (A moratorium on premature theorizing, i.e., jumping to conclusions, might slow down global warming by diminishing the hot-air output, and it would almost certainly save the print media some paper.) What's worse is that they often don't see what they're looking right at. They're like tourists who are so busy reading the guidebook, taking pictures, and queuing up for postcards that they don't know where they are.

Now that John Edwards is out of the race, I'm cautiously moving in an Obama direction. If enough of us do, and if we stick around past election day, there's half a chance that we'll manage to actually deal with race/racism, sex/sexism, class/classism and the rest in a way that makes it harder for the elites to play us off against each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm glad I kept reading! Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Whoever can beat McCain...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Feb 11, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whoever can beat McCain...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barack is offering us ...
Posted by: TarryFaster on Feb 11, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the opportunity to lift the yoke of racism off the shoulders of America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupid
Posted by: benzene on Feb 11, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh yeah, uh huh, let's market our campaigns directly to certain racial blocks, because, you know, races are, like, biologically real and stuff.

Utter bullcrap. To try to pigeon-hole an entire segment of the population (the segmentation based solely upon skin tone or hair texture) into definite political criterion is just plain stupid, shallow, and short-sighted. How is it wise, or even acceptable in a democracy, for one campaign manager to say "Oh, you need to say X because race Y will respond positively to X (because they are race Y)".

Everybody is talking about a new post-racial era, but nobody seems to realize that its a hallucination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stupid Posted by: Lesha
» RE: Stupid Posted by: desidid
» RE: Stupid Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Stupid Posted by: benzene
» yup- willie brown Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Huh? You mean treat people as equals?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 11, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The results from the CA Dem primary show that no serious candidate for the presidency can ignore the potential of multiracial voting coalition.

It would seem that to be elected, you might want to garner 50% + 1. The winning +1 vote might hinge on hair color, the quantity and quality of melanin in the candidate's epithelial layer, the presence or absence of a Y chromosome, whether the candidate is tall or slender, etc.

The + 1's are important--no matter their motives--make no mistake. But you've got to get to that magical 50% first, which should ensure a broad enough appeal among the electorate.

The fluff over race and gender "issues" is simply that: fluff. Give us good, productive, wise governance primarily, and if you have spare time, pay some lip service to the race- and gender-centrics that may provide the + 1. They certainly deserve it in a "winner-take-all" political scheme such as our two party system of rulership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you blind?
Posted by: mnascimento on Feb 11, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama supporters are sweeping the country with a multi ethnic, multi generational, multi partisan coalition. I am so proud of us.

Even while the pundits, are telling you that the electorate is divided along demographic lines, the electorate is giving them the finger.

In the few states that Billary "won" the margins are not as greatly in her favor, as the 2 to 1, and 3 to 1 margins in the many states that Obama carried.

We are ONE NATION, ONE PEOPLE. The idea that we can come together and "Get er Done" is becoming increasingly apparent.

California would not fall to Billary, if the primary were held today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama and multiracial?
Posted by: JavierGarcia on Feb 11, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton is the clearly the multiracial candidate. Obama has a few supporters sure, but to compare him to Hillary is a blatant lie. I am Latino and the Clintons are loved passionately by my community as well as by Asians that voted for Hillary by 75% in California. The most comprehensive and inclusive candidate is Hillary.

Obama has largely won due to black, left wing and elite support. He cannot win the general election. People truly must wake up and smell the coffee.

We Latinos like strong leaders and Obama has done nothing to convince anyone that he possesses those qualities. McCain with his liberal immigration policies and war hero life will walk away with the Latino vote and the Presidency if Obama is the candidate. Hillary is the only one that can carry this vote over McCain.

The take home message here is that in the immigrant and international communities the name Clinton is to leadership as Gandhi is to peace. McCain is a powerhouse, but he can't trump that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hispanics Put John McCain On the Road to the Presidency
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 11, 2008 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in S. Florida, 1 million Cuban-Americans solidly voted for John McCain in the Florida primary. This solidified McCain's Florida win and sent him on this way to the nomination. Hispanics by the way, are seriously divided on the candidates, even between Democrats and Republicans. The differences say between Mexicans and Cubans, are greater then the differences between Whites and African-Americans. Interestingly, many a Cuban American will consider him or herself Hispanic, but not Latino, why? Because Latinos "are the Mexicans," whom some of them consider lower class because of the poverty and illegal status they are from. Silly isn't it all? I'm not saying this occurs all the time, but, when you play the identity politics game, your in for a world of things that seem nonsensical and contradictory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

language-o-meter
Posted by: YogiBear on Feb 11, 2008 7:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya had me until here: "It is clear from the California result that we will now be witness to a paradigm shifting clash between two consciously multiracial organizing strategies."

Whaaa?

Please rephrase in English so us regular 'mericans can understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MULTICULTURALISM
Posted by: gellero on Feb 11, 2008 11:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will mean the death of America as we have known it in its greatness. Too bad you can't see it happening before your eyes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for the McWilliams
Posted by: peterrichardson on Feb 12, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad you mentioned the far-sighted work of Carey McWilliams. It holds up incredibly well after two generations--even in a state known for rapid change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm From California
Posted by: macdon1 on Feb 12, 2008 8:53 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I realize this will not sound politically correct, but Hillary did not win an Asian and Mexican majority in California. They voted against Obama not for Hillary. There is huge animosity against black people from these two groups, enough so that they would put aside their traditional machismo to vote for a white woman.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm From California Posted by: garnetbark
Stop the inanity!!
Posted by: de aqui on Feb 13, 2008 3:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please stop repeating the absurd and racist truism that Latinos in California won't vote for a black...or that they didn't vote FOR Hillary as much as they voted AGAINST Obama. I am so tired of hearing that bullshit. As a Latina progressive who finds both candidates qualified and a huge improvement on the current nitwit in office, I am getting a little tired of being told my people are too racist or uneducated to make an intelligent choice. I think there are a lot of oversimplistic and overenthusiastic Obama supporters who can't fathom why some folks think Hillary would make the best candidate, so they keep landing on race.PUHLEASE!! Think a little harder and try to have an open mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]