Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Can Obama Beat the Clock?

By Marc Cooper, Huffington Post. Posted February 5, 2008.


Barack Obama has only one competitor left standing and it's not Hillary Clinton. It's time itself.
Advertisement

Barack Obama has only one enemy left standing and it's not Hillary Clinton. It's time itself. All the evidence is in: the more that voters are exposed to Obama, the more they flock to him. The more they see Hillary Clinton, the more stagnant her numbers.

If the election were held last Tuesday, Clinton would have walked away with it. If it were to be held a week from this Tuesday, Obama would waltz to victory.

The latest surveys reveal an unmistakable and unprecedented surge by Obama, nationally and in almost every key state on this Tuesday's calendar of 22 primaries.

And one key survey even has him ahead in the gold-ring state of California where, a month ago, he was down by 20 points.

Obama's rise over this past week in the Golden State has been breathtaking. The state has rippled with the energy unleashed by the endorsement handed him by Teddy Kennedy and then follow-up with a one-two punch endorsement from the L.A. Times and the country's largest Spanish-language newspaper, La Opinion. Then along comes Oprah again to rock Sunday's pro-Obama rally at UCLA. Better said, a foreshock. Because the real rattler was the surprise endorsement by Maria Shriver, the wife of the sitting Republican Governor of California. Did I already say breathtaking.

Meanwhile, this Sunday morning while Bill Clinton was campaigning in a handful of black churches in South Central Los Angeles, the Obama ground crew was seen blanketing a much wider array of churches in the area. There were no TV cameras or packs of reporters -- just hard-working canvassers trying to capture support voter-by-voter.

What Obama's late surge tell us is crystal clear. He did the same in every early voting-state, slowly but surely eroding or overcoming the early, wide lead held by Clinton. In each case, she started out miles ahead and in each case Obama closed the gap. Conclusion: Hillary's strength is hollow. Based on stratospheric name recognition, institutional support, and celebrity she starts out with a natural advantage. But as voters get familiar with Obama, as they hear his call for change and change-over, as they watch the Clinton campaign resort to the worst sort of old-style politicking (most recently Hillary suggesting that voting for Obama would be akin to voting for Bush), the momentum builds in the opposite direction.

With just less than a day to go, the question is if Obama can beat the clock. Can he actually win California and the bulk of delegates this Tuesday to stage one of the greatest upsets in modern political history? Can he at least win enough delegates to stay alive and surpass Clinton next month in the Ohio and Texas primaries?

Conversely, a Clinton win this week, produced merely by the absurd acceleration of the primary calendar, would leave the Democrats with what might be called a Twilight Zone candidate -- a nominee who the party rejected but the calendar saved.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, hillary clinton, election 2008

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Out of the Blue
Posted by: When In Doubt on Feb 5, 2008 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Curiosity Question:
How much of Obama's "surge" is for the supurb work Michelle Obama has been doing for him?

The first time I heard her speak my first thought was : The wrong Obama is running!
The second time only confirmed my first impression.

I do believe this campaign has finally awakened America like no other in 40 years.

Now if we can decimate the 19th Century Republicans, we may get our country back, not unscathed, but back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out of the Blue Posted by: conwwaym
» RE: Out of the Blue Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Out of the Blue Posted by: andreline
Regardless of the outcome, we all win
Posted by: bryangalt on Feb 5, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this rarest of political milestones, our Presidential candidates are making history before our very eyes. Sure, there has been plenty of punting on the gender and race issues with Hillary and Barack, but it hasn't slowed the train down even slightly.

What I've noticed is how people are so consistent in their slamming of Hillary, when the reasoning behind their rhetoric is inconsistent or immature. Didn't Barack even acknowledge that much of the attacks on Hillary are unfounded?

Well, the press is one of the best personality grinders in the world and they are working to portray Hillary as slipping away to Barack's seemingly more energetic style. The press mentions regulary that we have a bunch of jack asses in this country that say they would rather elect another incompetent Republican than vote for Hillary if she gets the nomination. How stupid are these people?

What I never hear anyone mention is what will happen if Barack does get the nomination and goes on to win the race. I foresee that the tremendous expectations this country will have thrust upon him are going to be dashed by the reality of the political world where logic doesn't seem to be in the rule book.

Frankly, I am sure that Hillary or Barack will be great Presidents when given the chance. But, regardless of of warm and fuzzy Barack makes the electorate, the job he is trying to earn doesn't forgive those who are getting OJT (on the Job Training) as the Executive of a branch of government.

Does this mean he would fail? I hope not, but failure is so subjective in our odd country that it will depend on who you ask, where they live, what God visits them on Sunday and how much money they make.

Does the fact that Hillary lived in the White House for eight years qualify her as having quasi-Executive experience? I would say no. However, she has always struck me as someone who would have been a key participant in the Oval Office whenever possible and she also had years to observe the way that Washington works, something that Barack doesn't have any insight into.

If the people that vote for Barack do so believing that he is going to win the race and roll into Washington with anything but an monumental task on his plate, then they are being realistic.

WITH ALL OF THAT SAID, THE COUNTRY AND THE CITIZENS will be the true winners of this race since it has brought voters of the woodwork and given us two truly top notch people to choose from in Hillary and Barack.

The embarassing Presidency of Bush is almost over and our long national nightmare with it, giving us another win (although an impeachment or war crimes arrest would have been a better end for Bush). We are all so ready to move on and so happy to see we have leaders who know how to drive the bus to get us out of hickville Texas' leadership!! Just kidding...

VOTE FOR HILLARY OR VOTE FOR OBAMA. EITHER WAY, JUST MAKE SURE YOUR ASS IS AT THE BOOTH TODAY TO CAST A VOTE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OJT? Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: OJT? Posted by: Sushi
» He needs no OJT. Posted by: RobbieUMD
» RE: Typical Dem.Party Sheepel Posted by: Andie927
» RE: VOTE FOR EDWARDS Posted by: Andie927
» RE: VOTE FOR EDWARDS Posted by: EncinoM
Our Man
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Feb 5, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the 21st Century. We're awake. We're different. The GOP has been preventing our arrival.

The GOP MUST keep the status quo. They must be the Masters. They must command. Their command is hollow. Dead. Preventative. Filled with fear. Looking backwards into darkness. The demanding authoritative father who disregards with a flip of a hand.

Obama is the 21st century. He is in touch with our aliveness. He is the opening. He demands our attention. Calls us to be alive! Sees our innovation. Knows we are creative. Embodies the blending of differences that is America. Pierces past the veil of time.

WE HAVE ARRIVED. Obama is the unique man in our history. WELCOME him to your table as I have welcomed him to mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Man Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Wolf in Sheeps Posted by: Andie927
» RE: Our Man Posted by: andreline
The inevitable anti-Clinton Marc Cooper piece
Posted by: johnp on Feb 5, 2008 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More insufferable deceit from Marc Cooper. He tells us, the more Obama is revealed as he is to he public, the more they lean in his direction.
Rubbish. Hillary was loved by a huge majority, at the beginning of her campaign, and they knew her thoroughly. They've found out precious little about Obama, because media are keeping his past concealed, for the most part. But, in Hillary's case, it isn't Obama that has erased Hillary's lead in so many States, its media, represented at its lowest and least influential levels, by Marc Cooper's incessant attacks on the Clintons. The entire media establishment, and that includes, at the bottom of the barrel, such non-illustrious nobodys as Marc Cooper, has come together to constantly deamean Hillary. Obviously, these cowardly and persistent efforts will bear fruit, in reduced poll numbers for the NY Sen. Of course Cooper would like to assign the blame (the credit) for it, to Obama. That bolsters the candidate, any candidate, running against Clinton, and conceals Cooper's slimy and vicious agenda in the process. Rest assured, Cooper, we can see what a louse you are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time is on his side!
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 5, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw Obama interivewed on Fox news this morning - what a surprise - they asked this exact question. I personally think time is out for Hillary and has been from the start.

When people come out in mass they will vote for Obama over her. He has the momentum that will carry him - just look at this Ca. numbers!

She represents what was in the democratic party - he represent what it can be again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time is on his side! Posted by: gawalker
» RE: Time is on his side! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: WRONG! Posted by: Andie927
» RE: WRONG! Posted by: kimbari
» RE: His Own Propaganda! Posted by: Andie927
» RE: Never Vetted! Posted by: Andie927
» RE: Time is on his side! Posted by: andreline
Time may run out, but not on Obama
Posted by: JohnJlws on Feb 5, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time may run out, but it will run out for our nation, our world, and not Obama. Every election I've witnessed since Nixon/McGovern I have heard the argument that this is "the one."

The difference between all the others and this one is global warming, a global economy married to the oil industry, true global terrorism of poverty, starvation and disease, a global nuclear threat building not from the obvious, but from the fields of nuclear waste laying around unprotected in the old Soviet Union.

A new, fresh leader is needed. A leader who can inspire a nation in spite of its politicians. A leader with the capacity to be the first statesman in generations. A leader who can pull us together.

Obama '08.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

UBER TUESDAY
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 5, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, when you're finished reading all of the great articles and comments on AlterNet, have a look at what I wrote on the subject on my blog. Here's a link:

UBER TUESDAY

Cheers!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: reinaldok
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: cmaciain
» Try to see the good Posted by: jwg
» RE: Try to see the good Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Try to see the good Posted by: kimbari
» RE: Try to see the good Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: UBER TUESDAY Posted by: andreline
I don't see Clinton getting more than a marginal victory
Posted by: brunowe on Feb 5, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The poll numbers have been trending in Obama's favor and I think she'll only get a double-digit edge in DELEGATES won today. That will give here maybe a 100 delegate lead total with much of the race still to go.

One note, 1495 delegates are being committed today, another 353 delegates will automatically be uncommitted. This could be interesting if it comes down to a convention fight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Open Letter From a Woman with Children against Clinton
Posted by: COmac on Feb 5, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please take what time you can to review this letter Open Letter It is from a woman who previously supported Hillary but after what has happened with many of the firms represented by her past law firm including Monsanto and Tysons she cannot condone Hillary in any role in our government.

It is a long letter but full of references and notes from a concerned woman with children. My anam cara sent it to me, she's a staunch Hillary supporter, with the words... "after this I cannot support Hillary any longer."

For a better planet - chose again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lack of Choices
Posted by: joebird on Feb 5, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both Obama and Clinton are owned by the Council on Foreign Relations. Therefore they will not act in the interest of the American people. They will serve the interests of the international bankers that pretty own our government. The same goes for Huckabee, Romney and McCain.

That pretty much knocks out any votes for any Democrats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lack of Choices Posted by: andreline
My major reluctance to vote for Hillary,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 5, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
even though I respect her very much,is that the Repuke smear machine has had 16 years to make her into a she-devil in the opinions of some uninformed, stupid Americans-of which there are many unfortunately-who know only what they have heard shouted by the msm and look no further than the end of their noses and Faux news. This is not her fault-the American public on the whole is stupid and uninformed, and does little to change that unfortunate characteristic. The Repukes PREFER to keep the voters uninformed and uneducated-hence No
Child Left Behind and the control of the media by the right wing. Many voters made up their mind about this intelligent woman years ago when she tried to reform health care, and the Repukes have done so much to perpetuate that myth. I am not sure she can win in November because of the smear the right wing lying bastards are so good at, and I could not survive another 4 years of Repuke control.

What a country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards, only choice
Posted by: Andie927 on Feb 5, 2008 1:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
his campaign is only 'suspended' NOT ended! Send the Party a Message! Stop forcing your Corporate/Centrist DLC candidates down our throats, and forcing out the only candidates that offer us a REAL Progressive Choice!

Your vote will count, for far more then picking between the two Party Approved Picks!
You'll be telling them, your voting on the ISSUES! NOT gender or race! You'll be voting FOR: Media Reform, Restoring the Constitution, FAIR Trade NOT Corporate Welfare, Campaign Finance Reform, and a host more! Edwards IS the stongest cansidate on the enviroment, economy, you name it! That's why the Party had to get him OUT of the race!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dwards, only choice Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: dwards, only choice Posted by: andreline
Voting today? If not, then consider going to vote for "direct democracy"
Posted by: aouie01 on Feb 5, 2008 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted on the wrong article earlier.

Both "direct democracy" and "national initiative" address concerns similar to "direct representation".
Read and consider making a statement. Mike Gravel.

I haven't yet made headway on the concept of "direct representation" (bad of me), but essentially, it would be a much more idealized democratic system even better than "Proportional Representation". When it is done it will be at DirectRepresentation.com. It would be quite different from a similar concept that has been worded the same.

Essentially, people should be able to have a proportionate say in any thing that they want to have a say in.

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama the empty suit
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Feb 5, 2008 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All hope and bringing people together is no compensation for experience. When the vodoo spell wears off and voters realize that the Obama is one long, loud, and shallow plan to win the White House. Details of how these hopes will be realized are few and far between and seem to flip flop in the wind. Why didn't Obama vote for Iraq? Simple, he wasn't in Congress at the time. Bush lied to Congress, the People, and Hillary. She believed that a President would not lie to his people as we all did. All those flags and ribbons and talk of supporting "The Troops". Heck we all fell for the Bush bullshit, so don't blame Hillary - Blame President Bozo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama the empty suit Posted by: andreline
» RE: Obama the empty suit Posted by: redavenger
» No, not all of us fell for the BS Posted by: foreverhope
Many more reasons Hillary is unacceptable
Posted by: foreverhope on Feb 5, 2008 5:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much does Hillary Clinton cross ethical lines to try and win? And will this backfire on her campaign?

Politics can be a rough game. Candidates need to hold their competitors accountable and challenge distortions and lies. God knows, we need a Democratic nominee who's willing to fight. But Hillary Clinton's campaign has included so many cheap shots, sleazy manipulations, and unsavory players as to make these questionable actions a dominant tone.


linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Empty Vessel-Good talk but where's the action
Posted by: niliadis on Feb 5, 2008 8:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
great Talker, but where's the action. He articulates quit well and inspires and then what??? Obama has no substance and is not ready to be president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama and his hidden agenda
Posted by: Navyvet59 on Feb 7, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I consider myself to be above average intelligence and a superb judge of character. I have looked into Obama's eyes again and again because I mute his rhetoric and see someone who I cannot trust. As a former citizen of the state of Massachusetts, I knew when he got the nod from Ted Kennedy it was his kiss of death in my original home state! It is time for the American people to really ask hard questions of Obama. Ask about his connections to that sleaze ball in Illinois....he gave all the contributions to Oback....Oback claims he gave them all to charity....where is the proof? Monsanto and Tyson have to be represented by someone. Why doesn't the media ask him the hard questions? Why is he being giving the "do not go to jail" card from them? And in truth he is actually dividing the country not uniting it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]