Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Election 2008

In Obama-Hillary Battle for Super Tuesday, Retail Politics Is the Key

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted February 4, 2008.


At stake is not just the Democratic nominee, but whether the party will be revived from the grass roots.
Advertisement

All the ingredients are there for a historic outcome on Tuesday, not just for Hillary Clinton's or Barack Obama's presidential campaign, but for the Democratic Party.

The country's appetite for change is unassailable. States that used to watch from the sidelines are engaged. Voters have not been as active or energized in years. Both campaigns are spending record sums on ads and running get-out-the-vote operations not seen for decades in primaries or caucuses. That final ingredient -- the grass-roots organizing -- may make the biggest difference in 22 states that vote on Feb. 5, not just for the candidates but for the identity and fate of the party.

The Clinton and Obama campaigns are not just about the candidates, but about different strategies of governing, leadership and what kind of party the Democrats are and will be. And the biggest fault line appears to be whether a historic grass-roots effort by Obama can beat a professional top-down operation with its own grass-roots component, by Clinton.

In other words, the stakes are not just Obama versus Clinton, but the party's Old Guard versus its vanguard. As Tuesday nears, both are touting their grass-roots effort.

"We've put together a grass-roots campaign," Hillary Clinton told thousands of cheering supporters at the San Jose Convention Center at a Friday evening rally. "This weekend, be part of our bring-your-own-phone calling effort. We will call 1 million Californians this weekend."

"We are running the biggest field campaign in California since Robert Kennedy in '68," Erin Callahan, Obama's northern California spokeswoman, said late last week, noting the NorCal effort has 700 community groups, 250 volunteer teams and many others. The Southern California effort is even bigger. "When we started, people didn't think you could do that in California. We have proven you can."

"This is a really important historic moment," Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., told hundreds of Obama volunteers and supporters at a packed early Saturday rally in San Francisco, speaking of the leadership choice faced by Democrats. "We're coming from behind in this race. The momentum is building. I just talked to Barack Obama in Idaho. They expected 3,500 people. They had over 14,000."

Like Clinton, Kerry urged his candidate's volunteers to bring out their voters.

"This is a really important and historic moment in the journey for all of us," he said, in closing remarks he would echo in rallies in San Jose and Sacramento. "You have so much more power than you think. You can resolve to bring 20 people to the polls ... It's not enough to say 'Yes, we can.' It is 'Yes, we can' if you do the work that is necessary."

The race tightens

The San Jose rally for Clinton was a telling barometer of just how close the contest for the Democratic nominee has become. Like January's Nevada caucuses, where she won a large segment of the Latino vote, that same voting block is seen as possibly swaying the California Democratic primary. On Saturday afternoon, the press reported that Clinton unveiled a new stump speech. But on Friday night in San Jose, she stuck with the old policy-and-prescription script for a known and reliable political ally, Latino voters.

Clinton was introduced by, among others, Dolores Huerta, a legendary figure in the farm workers movement, who, after leading "Si se puede" chants -- yes, we can -- compared Hillary Clinton to the even more beloved farm worker leader, Cesar Chavez. "Do you know Hillary Clinton and Cesar Chavez have something in common," she said. "They both started their careers going door to door registering voters in South Texas, and we know that Cesar did the same thing in East San Jose."

"Cesar Chavez fasted for 36 days," Huerta continued. "He cared about the environment. She cares about the environment. She voted no to put nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain. That is why Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has endorsed Hillary Clinton ... Hillary Clinton sponsored and co-sponsored over 30 pieces of legislation for working people. She is the champion of working people."

Summing up, Huerta said, "Well, they say she can't bring people together, but she brought us together today."

The room cheered. It was filled with a middle-class and working audience, not college students. Perhaps half or more of the audience appeared to be Latino. Earlier speakers included other women who had been elected to Congress, who extolled how they and Clinton were breaking glass ceilings. When the candidate finally took the stage, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., stood with Clinton.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, grassroots, election 2008

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There are differences
Posted by: www.suekatz.com on Feb 4, 2008 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would have happily voted for Kucinich, but I'm leaning towards Obama for 3 reasons:

1) Kucinich suggested his supporters go for Obama and when asked why, he said, "I know them all. Vote Obama." Intriguing.

2) Clinton seems like a war-monger - not only her continuing support of the Iraq war, but her willingness to get behind Bush's threats to Iran and her answer that she might use nuclear bombs to kill Bin Laden. Besides she has terribly unsympathetic positions on the Israel/Palestine conflict, without a shred of feeling for a people in desperate poverty and deprivation due to the long-running occupation.

3. Obama talks quite explicitly about gay and lesbian rights to all audiences; he is the only candidate who connects the war in Iraq to the scary economic decline; and he doesn't want to criminalize people who can't afford to pay for health insurance.

Finally, though, you have to wonder about people who are entirely convinced that they are the best person to run the world. Really.

Sue
Visit my blog: Consenting Adult
www.suekatz.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There are differences Posted by: bbfmail
» Brzezinski factor, for one Posted by: fifthworld
Obama is not the real deal
Posted by: bthespoon on Feb 4, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He helped kill real health care reform here in Illinois where Democrats have been in full control now for over seven years. He disappointed me humongously with his answer to a Social Security/Medicare question by giving the standard Republican reply (they're both in crises and benefits will have to be cut or taxes raised). He did not say (as I was hoping) that if you simply unite all Americans into one protective pool for health coverage, that both of those manufactured crises will be solved, plus American lives and dollars saved. Now we could add our economic crisis to the problems that would be solved simply by fixing health care, which both he and Hillary have promised NOT to do by refusing to consider a Single Pool solution, and insisting that insurers will continue to be allowed to "single out and rate up" (discriminate against) sick people (AKA "cherry picking and lemon dropping"). I've read what Obama has said about health care. He is blowing smoke and mirrors. I have heard both him and Hillary commit lies of omission on this issue. They are in the pocketbooks of moneyed interests committed to making sure "Universal Care Done Right" never happens. 101,000 innocent Americans are dieing and $350 Billion of our health care dollars are being wasted every year while we fiddle. We the people are totally screwed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Eyes Wide Open!!!! Posted by: B4JRE
gemajabe
Posted by: gemajabe on Feb 4, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The candidates are pols. One not that much different than the other. How long are we going to pretend that gender does not exist in this contest, as the underlying motive for votes? Women always lean over backwards to be fair. It's a position that historically has left them behind the eight ball. The Dems would rather have anyone but a woman-so would the Rebublicans. Chances are they will get their wish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not a done deal Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: gemajabe Posted by: Flora Gael
» RE: gemajabe Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: gemajabe Posted by: Flora Gael
Cute Lil Bunny
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 4, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is the basket where the right and the media will convince us to put all of our eggs. Then...

Dallas, anyone?

Government of the people, by the people and for the people.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HR 676 Universal Health Care For All
Posted by: jacksmith on Feb 4, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bottom Line:

Like all of you. I know that health care is the most critical, and important issue facing the American people. Now, and in the coming elections. And like the vast majority of the American people, I want HR 676 (Medicare For All) passed into law NOW! "Single payer, Tax Supported, Not For Profit, True Universal Health Care" free for all as a right. Like every other developed country in the world has. See: http://www.house.gov/conyers/news_hr676.htm

“HR 676:
For church goers: less money to insur. companies and more to the church- lots more.
Srs on Medicare: save way over $100/wk. Because no more medigap, long term care & dental insur. needed. No more drug bills.”

But if we the American people fail to bring enough pressure on our current politicians to get HR 676 passed into law before the elections. We will have to identify, and replace all the politicians standing in the way of passage of HR 676. And, I think the best first place to start is with the politicians that blocked the bipartisan SCHIP bills for the kids. Passed by congress twice.

But what about the President. It was Bush after all that blocked the bipartisan SCHIP bill passed by congress to assure more health coverage for Americas kids. So which of the presidential hopefuls do I think will be most supportive of implementing the demand of the majority of the American people to have HR 676 (Medicare For All) passed into law immediately!

We have some very fine presidential candidates who would make good presidents. But none of the top Presidential candidates directly support HR 676, the only true Universal Health Care plan. So I am supporting Hillary Clinton. She is the only top candidate that has ever actually fought for universal health care before.

I have enormous admiration, and respect for Hillary Clinton. She fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds back in 1993. To prevent this disastrous health care crisis that is now devastating the American people, and America. She fought so hard for the American people that she risk almost completely destroying her husbands presidency. I haven't forgotten her heroic effort. If any Presidential hopeful for universal health care deserves my support, it's her.

Also, if we the American people fail to bring enough pressure on our government to give us HR 676 which we all so desperately need NOW! Then we will need the most skilled politician we can get on our side to broker the best health care plan for the American people that we can get. Though it will be less than we need, and less than we deserve. The politician I think to best do this is Hillary Clinton. The Clinton's are probably the most skilled politicians in American history.

The insurance industry, and medical industry that has been ripping you off, and killing you has given Hillary Clinton so much money because they fear her. They have also given Barack Obama so much money because they fear Hillary Clinton. They think they can manipulate Barack Obama against the best interest of the American people better than they can manipulate Hillary Clinton. There is no race issue with Hillary Clinton. The Clinton's are the poster family for how African Americans want white people to be towards African Americans.

As always, African Americans are suffering, and dieing in this health care crisis at a much higher rate than any other group in America. The last time there was any significant drop in the African American death rate was when Bill Clinton was president.

My fellow Americans, you are dieing needlessly at an astounding rate. In higher numbers than any other people in the developed world. Rich, and poor a like. Insured, and uninsured. Men, women, children, and babies. And we the American people must stop it. And fix it NOW! Keep Fighting!!! Never! give up. Bless you all...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bottom lines always in question Posted by: fifthworld
» I differ with you on this Posted by: fifthworld
If you should happen to bump into Hillary, out there knocking doors ...
Posted by: TarryFaster on Feb 4, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ask her to explain away the items on this list -->click.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» SHE ASKED TO BE CALLED HILLARY Posted by: Prairie Waif
What do we not know about Hillary thanks to the Republicans?
Posted by: greenthumb on Feb 4, 2008 11:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Ann Coulters and Fox Noise machine has done the work for us. Every imagined thing about this person and then some has been said.

I bet she really did kill Vince Foster and how about that cat?

Grow-up. She has been vetted.

She is not my first choice, Edwards is, but she is not a monster.
She triangulates and fudges on the truth but gosh Republicans never do that, do they.

Any one you get will have to be held accountable. That's your job, Mr and Mrs. Voter.

Please don't do the Republican Wingers job for them. She might be a triangulator, but she is OUR triangulator by God , and I intend to let her know it when she slips up if she is elected.

That women is mean and tough.I couldn't handle the crap she has had to put up with. I would be in an institution. If you can't name one thing she has done right, then you don't deserve to trash her any more.

I am voting for Edwards in the primaries and the Democratic candidate in the election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama-Hillary for Wall Street, Big Oil & Endless War
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Feb 4, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Voters have not been as active or energized in years"

Translation: Voters have not been so desperate for genuine change or as gullible for it in their lifetimes.

An Obama-Hillary ticket is a Trojan Horse that says virtually nothing real in serial vacant "change" 'n “hope” speeches as both shills are funded by the most reactionary Wall Street and Military Industrial Fascists on Earth.

Americans need to wake up.

Yesterday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at your economic situation and the.....
Posted by: niliadis on Feb 4, 2008 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes look at your economic situation and then make a vote for whom you think will bring the economy back to a surplus. After all its our livlihood!!!! look ahead.We are the only ones that feel the pain of only living to only work, instead of working to live with joy. We are the ones that sit at our kitchen table to pay the bills we can are strugling to pay.Its us that only feel our pain and we need to vote for us!!!!Vote for you and for your family. Forget what anyone says about any of the candidates. Vote for you! vote for a better economy to live a better economic life. Vote for you!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barak Obama's apostasy wrt Islam ==> deserves death according to some muslims?
Posted by: aouie01 on Feb 4, 2008 9:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama may be in a lot more danger than George Bush while visiting the middle east.

Read about Apostasy in Islam

I would expect that most rulers of middle-east countries, including Iran, will not draw attention to the issue. But, in religious circles it may be strongly disliked.

The relatively greater lack of freedom of belief in Muslim dominated parts of the world, will hopefully be directly addressed sooner rather than later.

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FRAUD on Voters by The Nation and Chris Hayes, Part 1 (Obama violates international law)
Posted by: representativepress on Feb 5, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
see video: FRAUD on Voters by The Nation and Chris Hayes, Part 1 (Obama violates international law)
http://representativepress.googlepages.com/FraudNation.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voting today? If not, then consider going to vote for "direct democracy"
Posted by: aouie01 on Feb 5, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both "direct democracy" and "national initiative" address concerns similar to "direct representation".
Read and consider making a statement. Mike Gravel.

I haven't yet made headway on the concept of "direct representation" (bad of me), but essentially, it would be a much more idealized democratic system even better than "Proportional Representation". When it is done it will be at DirectRepresentation.com. It would be quite different from a similar concept that has been worded the same.

Essentially, people should be able to have a proportionate say in any thing that they want to have a say in.

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]