ELECTION 2008  
comments_image -

Teachers' Attempt at Voter Suppression in Vegas Thrown Out in Court

A federal judge turns back a last minute lawsuit in a ruling that is seen as benefiting minority voters and the Obama campaign.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2008 headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

The Democratic Party's plans to hold presidential caucuses in nine large Las Vegas casinos were upheld by a federal judge Thursday, who rejected arguments from the Nevada State Teachers Association that sought to shut down the caucuses or at least change the way those meetings will award delegates to the party's state convention.

"The national party says we want to increase political participation in under-represented groups. I don't think it is up for me to upset that," said U.S. District Judge James Mahan, ruling from the bench. "It is something that the parties decide."

Jill Derby, Nevada State Democratic Party chair, said the casino caucuses will be held as planned on Saturday and there will be no change in the allocation of delegates.

"The Court validated the plan we had," she said. "We are going forward with that plan."

The ruling is seen as a boost to Barack Obama's campaign, because most of the attendees of the casino caucuses are members of the Culinary Worker Union local 230, which has endorsed his candidacy. The state education association, some of whose officers are supporting Hillary Clinton, filed its suit after the Culinary Union endorsement.

Lynn Warne, NSEA president, called the ruling unfortunate. She also said she had hoped that the court also would have found a way for some of its members -- who open schools and staff the caucuses -- to take a break to participate in their local caucuses. She said the NSEA suit was not filed on behalf of the Clinton campaign.

The Obama campaign praised the ruling in prepared statement.

"We're glad that the Nevada court upheld the Nevada Democratic Party's caucus plan which encourages voter participation," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton. "While the Clinton camp clearly believed the voices of workers should be silenced in service of their perceived political interest, they enjoyed a twenty five-point lead two months ago and have much of the party establishment in their camp. So, despite their inherent advantages we are pleased this should be a close and competitive contest Saturday."

The Clinton campaign issued a statement criticizing the ruling.

"Make no mistake, the current system that inhibits some shift workers from being able to participate, while allowing others to do so, would seem to benefit other campaigns," the campaign said. "More importantly it is unfair... The Obama campaign has been clear in its belief that whoever wins the culinary union endorsement will win Nevada. We will leave it up to the people of Nevada to make that decision."

THE COURT HEARING

Judge Mahan's ruling came after a hearing where both sides accused each other of disenfranchising likely Democratic voters.

The NSEA lawyers said Nevada's Democratic Party did not fully disclose that it would be awarding one state convention delegate for every five participants in the casino caucuses. In contrast, throughout the rest of Clark County, where Las Vegas is located, only one delegate would be assigned for every 50 participants, they noted.

"These rules are not fair, they violate equal protection," said Mark Ferrario, NSEA attorney. "There was something wrong with the process that led up to the adoption of the at-large precinct caucuses."

Ferrario argued that the delegate-heavy weighting of the casino caucuses was secretly developed by the state Democratic Party, was never formally adopted, and that it would dilute the votes of other Las Vegas caucus participants. He compared that dilution to poll taxes and white-only primaries in some southern states before the Civil Rights Movement.

"By upholding the (delegate ratio) count, you are disenfranchising my clients," he told the court.

In contrast, Bill Curran, the Nevada State Democratic Party's lead lawyer, said the NSEA suit was akin to an unexpected family fight just before a long-awaited big meal. He said the party did not have a secretive process to plan and create the caucus rules. That process began early in 2007, he said, adding the Democratic National Committee reviewed those plans last summer, suggested changes and approved it in October.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2008 headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: barack obama, las vegas, minority voters, james mahan
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]