Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Huckabee Reaffirms His Belief That Wives Should "Submit" to Their Husbands

By Chris Nolan, Majikthise. Posted January 14, 2008.


Mike Huckabee's dodge about mutual submission doesn't fit the Southern Baptist Convention code that he endorsed.
govmikehuckabee
Huckabee
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Gov. Mike Huckabee reaffirmed that a wife should submit to her husband during last week's Republican debate in South Carolina.

Huckabee tried to soften the blow by saying that the Bible commands husbands and wives to give to each other 100%. He endorsed a far more radical position in 1998 when he endorsed the Southern Baptist Convention's amended statement on the family in a national advertising campaign.

The Southern Baptist Convention revised its core statement of belief in June of 1998 to include an explicit dictate for wives to submit to their husbands. Mike Huckabee and his wife Janet were among the 131 prominent Baptists signed a statement telling the SBC: "You Are Right" about the new family code.

Here's what Huckabee said the SBC was right about:

XVIII. The Family

God has ordained the family as the foundational institution of human society.

It is composed of persons related to one another by marriage, blood, or adoption.

Marriage is the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime. It is God's unique gift to reveal the union between Christ and His church and to provide for the man and the woman in marriage the framework for intimate companionship, the channel of sexual expression according to biblical standards, and the means for procreation of the human race.

The husband and wife are of equal worth before God, since both are created in God's image. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to His people. A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family. A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation. [The Baptist Faith and Message]

Am I the only one disturbed from the segue from "the family" to "sexual expression" to "submission"? If family the forum for Christian sexual expression, and wives are supposed to submit to men on "family" matters...

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: religion, sexism, marriage, religious right, huckabee, christianty

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
the Headship of Christ?
Posted by: Lauren on Jan 14, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ."

OMG! I have never heard the male sexual organ called THAT before!

I'm sorry, but this is just way too much for me. Is this bizarre religious teaching common in other religions? I mean, come on, how is this not just outrageously sacrilegious? Think what it implies for how Jesus should treat his church. The gnostic bridal chamber ceremonies come to mind. Is that what Christ was about? I didn't hear about that in Sunday school.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The SBC and like-minded Christians will be after birth control next
Posted by: Jasonix on Jan 14, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The president of the SBC's top seminary wants to ban birth control, and for people to be married at 19. There has been a spate of books in recent years by fundamentalist Christians advocating the Catholic position on birth control. I'm not sure that I understand or can explain why they believe this, or why there is a concentrated push to sell conservative Protestants on Catholic ideas about birth control. (A few years back, an SBC seminary president would be fired and blacklisted for advocating any idea that smacked of the Papacy.) But it seems to be that religious groups that firmly believe in their own supremacy and righteousness feel compelled to outbreed others, and thus ensure their dominance. Before you can outbreed the unsaved, you have to turn your women into slaves. Educated women with their own careers don't have as many kids. The Mormons and the Catholics have already explored this, and the fundamentalists are just following their well-worn script.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Texas Larry
Posted by: webbtex on Jan 14, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a Baptist minister in the South but no longer a Southern Baptist. This from Huckabee is one typical example of why I changed my designation. In the hostile takeover by fundamentalists, which began in 1979 and was completed by the mid-1980s, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) moved away from me. The SBC was always conservative in relation to other major US denominations, but it took a much sharper turn to the right with this takeover. From the time of Reagan, it also became publicly identified with the political right. Some have called the SBC -- appropriately, I think -- the political arm of the GOP.

Huckabee's stance calls a wedding ceremony to my mind from nearly 30 years ago. One of my nephews was married to a sweet young woman. Both were about 20 years old. The pastor called on the bride to promise to "love, honor, and obey" her husband. I nearly gagged at that call and as I viewed those two attractive young people. The boy had no more obvious maturity or insight than his bride, but he somehow was being endowed with the license to tell her what to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Texas Larry Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: Texas Larry Posted by: carcinoid112
what does Mrs Huckabee think of that?
Posted by: g on Jan 14, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, maybe I don't want to know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Let The Huckster Lie To Our Faces...
Posted by: Winghunter on Jan 14, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and get away with it!

Candidate Research - Know Who You're Voting For ( The Easy Way )
http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/ candidate_research_know_who_youre_voting_for/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Happened Before
Posted by: Arlene on Jan 14, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the campaign for the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution, the fundamentalists of all stripes were scrambling to put a lid on equality for women. The Mormon church was particularly active in defeating the ERA in several states in the late 1970's. Authors of "christian" marriage manuals had to tap dance real hard convincing their readers that submissive did not mean inferior. If you read Merriam Webster, that's exactly what it means. The antonym for submissive is dominant, after all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr Huckabee...
Posted by: zipper696 on Jan 14, 2008 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My 5 foot 2 wife will kick your ass - any day of the week!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who could possibly want,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jan 14, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or find attractive, a partner that was willing to go along with this bullshit?

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who could possibly want, Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Who could possibly want, Posted by: lepidopteryx
Huck is not a primate....
Posted by: blitzmesser on Jan 14, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"For example, Mike Huckabee's God tells him that he's not a primate, and Huck doesn't give the Good Lord any guff."

Good point! :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT AIN'T NECESSARILY SO
Posted by: outrider on Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can any believer believe Huckabee? Why do so many people who profess to be Christians believe hucksters whose actions are the antihesis of what Christ taught?

I am an atheist. I believe in and try to follow the teachings of Christ insofar as they deal with the way we should interact with others, not because of fear of the unknown but because my conscience tells me these are the things I ought to do. But Christianity, bdlief in Christ's philosophy, is one thing. Christians are something else as witness their support for the present administration and its treatment of humankind and the universe. Christians don't use the Bible for political purposes.

Let he/she who has not sinned vote for Huckabee or Romney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]