Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

Obama's Inauguration Speech: A Call for Responsibility and Sacrifice at a Time of Gathering Storms

By Barack Obama, AlterNet. Posted January 20, 2009.


"We must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America."
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Following is the prepared text of President-elect Barack Obama’s Inaugural Address, as provided by the Presidential Inaugural Committee:

My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land - a nagging fear that America’s decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights.

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America - they will be met.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of short-cuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the faint-hearted - for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things - some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sanh.

Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions - that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, 2009, inauguration speech

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wow...
Posted by: 2thepoint on Jan 20, 2009 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama...pretty cool..

Alternet you were fast for sure

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "We Are Ready To Lead Once More" Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Peacenik Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Peacenik Posted by: edgar1
» You're a Prophet, Prophit Posted by: amacd
fanny666 is dead, long live fanny666
Posted by: Defenestrator on Jan 20, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I changed my name. With the new president, there's no need to be a member of the Asses Of Evil anymore.

Glad Obama is president now... now we push him to be better than his DLC instincts!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This speech should put to rest the criticism that Obama does not truly share progressive values
Posted by: PaulC on Jan 20, 2009 10:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This speech took me completely by surprise regarding the way Obama specifically refuted, almost as if going down a list, every one of the failures of principle that has come to be the true legacy of the Bush administration: the exclusion of all but the wealthy from the halls of power, the use of fear combined with the trashing of the rule of law, the failure to lead or regulate, the unabashed greed, and on and on.

It was so blatant that even Tom Brokaw commented that had Bush read this speech beforehand the warmth he conveyed to Obama before the speech might not have been seen.

And I was shocked to hear pastor Rick Warren (I think that is his name) utter a few nods to evangelical fundamentalism then proceed to launch into a litany of progressive values! I am so amazed!

And I did not get the pastor's name who gave the Benediction afterward, but what a magnificent job he did, combining power of prose with whimsical humor to end it (brown will stay around, yellow will be mellow, red can get ahead, white will do what is right).

The whole thing was a progressive's dream and I am once again given confidence that we have the right man in the office at the right time.

And all of that against the backdrop of the former criminal-in-chief and his dark overlord being unceremoniously flown out of the halls of power.

Hallelujah, Praise the Lord! I never thought I would say that! HaHaHaHa!

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Just Words. Posted by: -matti
» RE: Just Words. Posted by: Beck
» Big zero. n/m Posted by: PaulC
» Ha! Great work, Lilly! Posted by: PaulC
» Pastor for the benediction Posted by: hollyw25
While we're dusting, clean the crevices
Posted by: weathered on Jan 20, 2009 11:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and dismantle AIPAC before they completely corrupt this administration too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great speech
Posted by: solrev on Jan 20, 2009 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama defined an America, that may be only a dream but it is a good dream. He offered the dream to the world with an olive branch in place of the big stick. What ever happens, Obama pointed the way to a better path. I am sure many will complain that there were no details about how to actually make the dream a reality. The devil is always in the details. We will have to wait and see if Obama leads us down the path or compromises us into oblivion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's up to us now Posted by: hollyw25
» RE: It's up to us now Posted by: Beck
» RE: It's up to us now Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Great speech Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
It's sickening making a centrist into a revolutionary
Posted by: VicJuans on Jan 20, 2009 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone else noticed the upsurge of propoganda on TV from All State Commercials, Chevron commercials, to Starbucks, and Pepsi telling all the working people to work MORE, sacrifice MORE, Volunteer MORE, all in the name of our great Saviour Obama? So after capitalism ravages most and enriches some, now the working people need to give up MORE!?

The US propaganda machine has nothing on the USSR, let it be said once and for all...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A "Reality-Based" Hope... Posted by: -matti
Possibility Reborn
Posted by: Dixie Dawg on Jan 20, 2009 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fear ridden right must find a new voice or be not only left behind but forgotten. It is for this hour this president has been brought to this time and place. We will press on. Possibility is reborn. There is again vision. The people will flourish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» El Caudillo Posted by: edgar1
» RE: l Caudillo Posted by: EncinoM
» If only it were 1932 Posted by: edgar1
Ok Barry, nice speech and thanks for trying but this girl is not convinced that BHO is anywhere
Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield on Jan 20, 2009 11:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
close to being a true progressive/liberal. With Ronnie Raygun and even Richard Nixon, there was no fear in pushing conservatism down the country's throat but with these imbecile Democrats for the last 16 years, it's all nothing but empty promises and liars who try to give us false hope of change only to have us watch them succumb to the same old abusive rightwingers who screwed up this nation to begin with.

By the way, why isn't Barry including the need to rescind tax breaks for those making over $200,000 as part of his "stimulus" bill? Either the money for that "stimulus" bill is going to come from the big fat weasels or we the lower and middle class chumps on Main Street are going to be further stripped financially along with more cuts to critical public infrastructure budgets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's the Maalox?
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 20, 2009 12:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm pretty sure you could write a simple computer program to create an Obama speech.

The challenges before us are great.

The obstacles we face are daunting.

We must stand determined.

The road ahead is long and hard.

But together we will rise to a New Day.

Through the strength of our principles and courage of our convictions..blah blah blah

Did I miss anything? Oh yeah, The Market is great.

Industrial strength pablum is what it is..gotta be a vat of it in some factory in New Jersey or something..takes a lot more than Maalox to choke this crap down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where's the Maalox? Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Where's the Maalox? Posted by: Blink
THANKS! SEND US YOUR PICTURES from INAUGURATION
Posted by: Tana Ganeva on Jan 20, 2009 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tana from AlterNet here. Do you have great pictures from the inauguration? Send them to feedback@alternet.org. Subject line: Pictures Inauguration

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to celebrate your oppression through a Presidential invocation
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 20, 2009 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few notes on "How to celebrate your oppression through a Presidential invocation."

Such touching analysis on Lincoln's bible, was it his, which version of the bible is it yada, yada, yada.

Anyone who naysays this Barack guy is a beyond the pale cynic who only wants to harsh the buzz of the American moment.

What color is Michele's dress? Mustard?

So much comity between the aisles.

Joe Biden chatting away. Does that even need to be discussed? Twitter, twitter, twitter.

Everyone's here but the star of the show, Barack H. Obama.

Baritone voice: "Ladies and Gentlemen."

Heraldic trumpets in the background.

"My country tis of thee,
Sweet land of liberty...and so on..."

Great stuff coming soon to the American political theatre.

Warmed over American Exceptionalism.

Whitewashing of history.

Veiled threats to those who don't get on board.

America as 'can-do' Nation and pretty darn special in fact the mostest specialist ever, in God's eyes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» America as 'can-do' Nation Posted by: chance garden
The master has told the servant what to serve up first.
Posted by: edgar1 on Jan 20, 2009 1:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#1 item mentioned by "I'm against the Iraq War unlike Hillary" Obama: "Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred."

GW couldn't have said it better. In fact, Dick Cheney probably wrote it.

Oh well. While Obama spends 4yrs on the basketball court and talking to youngsters in DC schools, Rahm Emmanuel and the Pentagon will be busy on the real economic program.

What a chuckle and what chumps. Change change change. And who do you think will build all those roads and bridges? Unlicensed high school dropouts and illegal immigrants?

This guy is good. Really good. As they count their trillions in federal cash, the bankers and investment gurus must wonder why they ever chose a clunker like Bush when a sharp articulate young salesman who could buy off both the blacks and the white professionals can sucker the suckers SOOOOOOOOOOO much better.

And the media focuses on the cute little daughters and Michelle's wardrobe. Of course!

Psst: Bet Bill Clinton, the all-time grifter, is provider little whispers behind the scenes along with Bob Rubin who just "stepped down" from spinning down Citigroup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"We must endeavor, to persevere...!"
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jan 20, 2009 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing about this speech and concept is that Americans are working harder than ever in recent years and for less and less reward or earnings..

Now we hear that poor and working and middle class folks should volunteer with all the abundant free time they have, while also trying to prepare for their evictions and foreclosures along with plant closings and their kids having to quit school due to lack of funds...

What I am getting at is that we've had 8 years of the rich receiving tax breaks and living high on the hog while the average American struggles and worries about just barely paying for the essentials if even that..

We will not see an increase in taxes on the rich any time soon and so they will continue to not pay their fair share even during a time of war make that two wars..and the overall "war on terror" to which they have contributed nothing not one thin dime..to date..

So we must volunteer to take care of each other, because the government will be busy killing people in foreign lands, starting new wars and taking care of the rich and the bankers..as usual..!

Ain't change great..?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Because Obamabots keep blocking real change ! Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield
The Storm
Posted by: PaulK on Jan 20, 2009 5:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike the previous occupant, Barack Obama is facing reality. The country's $10 trillion debt is a storm. The debt service at 5% is $500 billion a year, every year forever.

By pulling various levers of government, a president can choose to bankrupt the nation's home-grown companies, make the dollar worthless, throw half the citizens out of work, beggar our neighbors, or maybe a little of each.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An Alternative Thought On This Day of National Rejoicing
Posted by: A Simple Equation on Jan 20, 2009 5:41 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I see more than anything else in our nation, is nothing more than an overt expression of feelings and rarely, if ever, one of intellect. Does anybody really THINK anymore and not just blindly follow in lockstep with all the others in this country who are hopeful, excited, overwhelmed, enthusiastic, and all of the other happy emotions which seem to be driving our national psyche by a powerfully charismatic and "hip" new leader? Have any of these followers bothered at all to look beyond the facade and amazing oratorical skills of this new savior?

I'm not saying that hope is bad. Like most Americans, I am glad that the Bush Regime has come to an end and realize how much damage his administration has done to our country and the innocent millions around our world. I am hopeful, too, at this point in history that we will be able to restore the Republic, NOT the 'Democracy' or rather Plutocracy or Oligarchy which we've become, under which this country was founded. I am hopeful that many more Americans will wake to the fact that government, especially BIGGER government, is NOT the answer to, but the SOURCE of the majority of our current problems.

If people look within themselves and realize that THEY are the answer, then this feeling of hope will be a positive force for change in this country. But, if these same people wait for marching orders from the newly corronated ruler of this country; to 'sacrifice' for the 'greater good', to give up more rights and freedoms for 'greater security' in a 'dangerous world', my hope will be diminished indefinitely, until a time comes when we Americans realize we have been sold out by a greed and profit driven corporatist and fascist system hell bent not only on destroying our Constitution, but our way of life as we know it with their puppet politicians and control of our government & monetary systems.

Nowhere have I seen or heard any of these liberal or progressive Obama followers talk about the unconstitutional Federal Reserve System which has been fleecing our country for TRILLIONS of dollars since its inception in 1913. That is the true source of our economic problems, yet I never hear anyone speak about how it has fundamentally destroyed our economic strength and the value of our currency through the hidden inflation tax. Do your research, Obamatons, and realize he has pegged the current New York Fed Reserve Prez and income-tax evader, Timothy Geithner, to be our new Treasury Secretary. This is NOT 'Change' we can believe in. Not even close. Had he chosen Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich for Treasury secretary, I would be filled with hope and optimism for REAL change like many of my fellow Americans today, but unfortunately, I am not since I am awake and aware of the true power structures which control our world.

The banks and corporations own this country, not 'We The People' as it was intended by our founders who fought so passionately under threat of life and limb to give us the freedoms we so dearly take for granted today. So, take all that hope and inspiration for change and change YOURSELVES first. Change what you truly know about your country, your law of the land, the Constitution, and who really controls things in the world. Work to affect change within and at a local level. Work to change what you can and don't wait for the new 'king' to do it for you. We all know that those who created the problems in the world will offer us the solutions in the form of a world government, world currency and more and more control over our lives. All for our 'own good' or 'the children', of course. Learn the Hegelian Dialectic and how it controls our lives. LEARN people, don't just HOPE. We've been lied to for years and will continue to be lied to until we demand accountability from those who have sworn under oath to SERVE US, and not vice versa. No matter what you 'think' or more importantly, 'FEEL' today, this is not freedom...or change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What he said... Posted by: Tom Tele
» What if the truth is an illusion? Posted by: chance garden
» Yes, we have. Posted by: Beck
» Yes, we have elected more status quo. Posted by: Jennifer Bedingfield
apologize already!
Posted by: topbrick on Jan 20, 2009 10:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"we will not apologize for our way of life" is a thinly veiled version of Bush's "they want to destroy us because we believe in liberty and freedom". In other words, our WAY is superior. Hypocrisy! USA needs to apologize for the fat, wasteful way of life it has been living at the expense of so many impoverished countries and our world's environment. Humility needs to be found before it's too late.
Obama's speech was entirely forgettable and just more of the campaign rhetoric. Let's see if he has the moral courage to flout Israel's influence, lift the embargo on Cuba, close Guantanamo immediately, end the phony wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and admit to the world that the USA has been the biggest terrorist of all in the past 50 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: apologize already! Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: apologize already! Posted by: violawall
Just wondering...
Posted by: FREE SPEECH on Jan 21, 2009 1:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can Obama technically be President even though he severely mangled the oath?

;>)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just wondering... Posted by: _cat_
» RE: Just wondering... Posted by: mtatasmith
» RE: He didn't mangle the oath ROBERTS did! Posted by: watching-n-waiting
Barack Oabama: The Promise of We We ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 21, 2009 1:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I stand here today humbled by the task before us,..."

Don't be humbled, kick some ass!

~~~

"I thank President Bush for his service ... "

Why, for the 8 years of disaster or that he made you stay in a hotel ?

~~~

"Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real."

~ So the months of Newspaper Headlines and the Nightly News broadcasts are correct?

~~~

Barack invoked himself 3 times in his speech in the "I" form ... The rest was us, we, we, we, us ... I didn't realize that "we" were on the committee to run the country, that it was up to "us" to set policy and enact legislation. Talk about the ultimate disclaimer!

I see no leadership here, none, just political posturing ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barack Oabama: The Promise of We We ... Posted by: watching-n-waiting
Can We Acknowledge Reality?
Posted by: gazooks on Jan 21, 2009 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impatient diatribe, idealist nay-saying, defamatory assumptions and cynical characterizations, while having their place and purpose, serves our individual ideological and emotional needs at the expense of a workable perspective for a practically corrective political process.

I think that it's inarguable from a progressive viewpoint that we're significantly better off as of noon Tuesday. The hopes and expectations of many millions of Americans, a significant number of whom are marginalized in ways many of us may not or can not fully appreciate, were elevated, inspired and vindicated. It was the result of an unprecedented effort and broad based support of social minorities.

An uncommon event of political origin supporting a youthful, intelligent, and as yet, a morally unscathed political figure of definite distinction from his immediate predecessors. This, I submit, is a good thing and worthy of celebrating.

It is also undeniable that the country is in shambles with plutocratic influences intact, vast political and economic imbalance, a social, religious based schizophrenia at hard odds with it's own ideals, imbedded hegemonic international initiatives based in fictitious economic ambitions with potentially catastrophic environmental degradation and systemic collapse.

We have been invited to the corrective party by this presumptively capable President to assist in the workout of the steaming pile of shit left by the neo-cons at our doorstep.

We can either tear down the however unlikely prospect that Obama is authentically capable, committed to equity under the Constitution and can really make a difference, OR, we can get busy finding our place at the table in shaping priorities constructively and creatively.

I applaud Barack Hussein Obama in his astonishing success, and I encourage everyone that truly wants to do something more then vent on these pages to apply their intelligence and creativity in whatever way that they can to make this fantastic opportunity for systemic change a reality.

We may never again have a similar opportunity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry, your post is propaganda... Posted by: chance garden
» Sorry to bust your bubble. Posted by: arraya
» On ruse and delusion... Posted by: chance garden
» Well said, gazooks! n/m Posted by: PaulC
Already--Obama's first accomplishment!
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 21, 2009 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simply by taking the oath of office, Obama has decupled the competence of the Federal government. That's his first accomplishment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm 33 now...
Posted by: CosmoViking on Jan 21, 2009 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this guy is the first president that truly inmspires me. It's clear he's read books that I have read. It's clear that he means business. I think some the vast secret national security structures will come down, classified information and tech will emerge.

So I feel optimistic, and that's pretty great for a change.

Most exellent inauguration dudes ;o)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm 33 now... Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: Define This... Posted by: gazooks
» RE: Define This... Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: I'm 33 now... Posted by: legacyshooter
Can any of you naysayers...
Posted by: writer7 on Jan 21, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
be happy for what this means to African Americans? Can you step outside of yourself for a fucking change and see what this might mean to others? Can you imagine having relatives that were slaves, surviving Jim Crow, being beaten for the color of your skin, being called n*****, having doors to education, decent jobs, decent housing slammed in your face? Obama is not perfect - he will make mistakes just like Kucinich, Nader or McKinney would, had they been elected. But he's a hell of a lot better than the dimwit that's back in Texas and I don't even want to think about a President McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What this means? Posted by: chance garden
» RE: Yes! We! Can! Posted by: watching-n-waiting
» RE: yes, war crimes charges! Posted by: chance garden
- They Are Going TO ATTACK US AGAIN
Posted by: Anthhh on Jan 21, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are going to False-Flag attack us again.
Blame it on " t_e_r_r_o_r_i_s_m " again.

To more fully destroy the Islamic Middle Eastern civilizations.(and their benefactors)

When the "attack" happens, the poor little good guy will expect (and demand ) the full cooperation of the world to end some civilizations- errrr -i mean "terrorism".

DEMAND Reforms in the Structure of the UN Security Council NOW!
~
~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Free US from Israel Posted by: weathered
» worldwide outrage Posted by: Anthhh
» RE: worldwide outrage Posted by: weathered
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Actions talk and bullshit walks...
Posted by: Farasien on Jan 21, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd be lying through my teeth if I said I have any real hope of seeing any of the changes Obama has promised. Let's explore why...

1. A broken system makes lots of profit for corrupt people. The american system is almost as broken as it can get. The rulers of the system-the same ones who backed bu$h and most of the other regimes in recent history-backed Obama. Obama OWES them, and weather we-or he-likes it or not, he will be paying them back or its likely he'll be joining the likes of Kennedy in the rolles uncooperative-and DEAD- (because the military industrial complex doesn't like its plans violated) visionaries.

2. The succession of assholes who came before Obama FUBARed things up so badly its going to take at least a generation, if not longer (that's in the range of about 50 years, folks-not 4 or even 8) to un-FUBAR it. The damage has been more than just making rich bastards even more rich- they damaged education (so you never get the right knowledge to get ahead and make yourself into competition), rewrote history (so you don't even know how BADLY they screwed things up) and rewrote the laws of the land to entrench themselves irreversably into the country (and through globalism, the world. Yay.) To cure the nation of its vast number of endemic ills, you'll damn near have to kill it.

3. Even IF Obama was really serious and fully intended to change things, he can't because EVERYBODY else in government is fighting to make sure it doesn't (keep in mind who they REALLY work for!). While the traitors in the democratic party were cheering for Obama recently, let's not forget they OK'd bu$h's demands for more and expanded war, multiple direct-to-the-CEO 'bailouts', shrugged when the dictator directly broke the constitutional law when he SPIED on all of us without warrants, who gave a raving pass to the ironically-named PATRIOT act (both 1 and 2!), signed into law the No Child Allowed to Succeed bill... I can go on and on and on. The assholes in congress are all of the same party folks, and they don't work for you and I- they make that clear every time they vote against the REAL public's interest. Against the entire government, even an honest and well-meaning Obama doesn't stand a chance.

So, standing against Obama's publicly-announced plans, we have the entire business world, virtually every single politician and the not-insignificant forces time and human apathy.

Heh! Ask your bookie what the odds are of THAT happening. Its a sucker's bet. Let's see how many people still love him when he goes back on his promises. I give his favorable opinion poll numbers less than 6 months to live. Any takers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not only all that Posted by: Beck
» RE: not only all that Posted by: Spot
READ THIS ARTICLE
Posted by: Lilly on Jan 21, 2009 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google by title "The Founders' Great Mistake" by Garrett Epps, in the January-February issue of "The Atlantic". It explores the historic role of Alexander Hamilton in designing the role of the US president, with special focus on the concept of "unitary executive"---and suggests some remedies against there ever being another Bush-type president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Not Just Torture - That is Just The Tip Of An Evil Iceberg of Human Depravity
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jan 21, 2009 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In order to understand what has really happenned over the last 8 years, you need to have a good understanding of history going back to at least WWII.

At the start of the new Millennium I was ignorant. I knew nothing of the covert operations, the history of the Bush family - supporting the Nazis even before WWII. I didn't know the World economy changed in 1971 when the French demanded payment in Gold - and the US could not or would not deliver; How Kissinger did a deal with Saudi Arabia and OPEC such that oil would only be sold in US Dollars. I didn't know about PNAC and how they tried so hard to get Clinton to invade Iraq - and why a New "Pearl Harbour" was required.

I didn't understand any of this history until after 9/11 and it took 18 months before I became completely convinced that the official story of the event was blatantly untrue.

But I can see the motivation behind the evil. The Bush administration could claim quite fairly that the action they took was needed to prevent the total and utter collapse of the US economy. Part of their logic may have been based on a mathematical understanding of exponential growth. Exponential growth simply cannot continue in a finite world. It is a mathematical impossibility. So the logic was all about saving America - at all cost. The rest of the World could go to hell. The Middle East had to be secured as American property and oil had to continue to be sold in US Dollars. Otherwise, the lights would go out in America, the economy would collapse, Americans would starve and there would be Civil War.

That's why the cabal did it. Very few Americans even knew about it. Quite possibly Bush still believes that Bearded Muslims did it planned from a cave in Afghanistan - though as the Bin Laden family have had close ties to the Bush family for many years - then that is somewhat hard to believe.

You can hide your head in the sand and pretend it didn't happen that way, but you are merely deceiving yourself because your psychology is such that you cannot accept that such evil came from within your own tribe. It must have come from another even more evil tribe - the "Muslims". "We can see the Muslims are evil - just look what they do to their women etc."

But if you analyse the detail of everything that happenned - the motivation, the history and the actual scientific evidence - then it may be an incredible emotional shock to everything that you believe with regards to the goodness of your society and culture being totally incapable of such evil - BUT such things have happenned throughout history - in human cultures throughout the World. The German people aren't intrinsically evil - but just look what they did - still within living memory.

The Evil needs to be exorcised and the Criminals brought to justice. No one can assume Guilt of anyone until all the evidence has been heard under cross examination in Fair Independent Objective Trials.

Personally I think such trials should be heard in the International Court of Justice in the Hague. It is not just a very few Americans who are Guilty - and by no means are they all politicians.

No matter how good or bad the new American Government turns out to be, no real progress can be made with regards to the future of Mankind and Life of Everything on this planet unless Justice is Done and Seen to Be Done.

The human race can withstand financial collapse. We can start again with a new economy. We can learn to gracefully reduce our population and properly look after and protect our home the planet Earth. But we can do none of these things while the evil is still amongst us.

All people on this Earth started as Babies. Babies are not born with original sin. They are completely innocent and have the same human rights across the planet.

There is nothing special about Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was a day I will NEVER forget..from start to finish!
Posted by: mtatasmith on Jan 21, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Couldn't sleep at all the night before -
Never thought I would describe standing in one place for over 6 hours in below freezing weather as DIVINE - but it was! Shoulder to shoulder with all of my new best friends!
A new day is dawning in America - thanks be to all the people who paid attention and voted for Barack Obama! Now it is time to read, and reread his speach, take it to heart and do what we can to help the situation!
What a breath of fresh air!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

encouragedinVA
Posted by: sherry on Jan 21, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole day felt simply grown-up; so nice to be here after such a prolonged adolescence, at least the last 20 years. I came home from watching the inaugural address and signed up for training as an adult literacy and English as a second language tutor. At the same time, I plan to push this new Congress and this new administration to pass single-payer health insurance, HR 676. We have work to do, time to "dust ourselves off."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inauguration surprises - not good
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Jan 21, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was actually a little disappointed in O's speech - this was the time for him to either really get down to business about change....or throw some over the top inspirational rhetoric at us. What we got was a here's how you can volunteer, blah, blah, etc., rather stern lecture. I have to give him a pass, however, on Roberts' total screw-up on the oath. I personally hope that Obama redoes the oath just for the sake of comfort with the kind of enemies he has.

But what disappointed me most was the poem that whoever she was gave. I thought it was downright terrible - really amateurish and totally unworthy of this event.
And don't even get me started on Rick Warren and the endgame preacher - horrible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He couldn't get Bob Dylan? Posted by: edgar1
A fine speech
Posted by: talkville on Jan 21, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed a fine speech, a work of excellent Rhetoric so far... . We must wait, and we must see.

Responsibility? I wholeheartedly agree! Sacrifice? .... now there's a loaded Word!!

As an addendum to this fine re-print, I might recommend the piece by R Jensen entitled "A Citizen's Oath of Office" found in Counterpunch.org online.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did you see the critical code phrases on U.S. Foreign Policy?
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Jan 21, 2009 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's one:
"We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense..."

Our way of life is based in part on the exploitation of labor and resources from other countries...

Here's another:
"Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred."

Yup...
"To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society’s ills on the West - know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy."

Here's some more juiciness:
"To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds."

The actual record of U.S. interventions in poor countries is quite different - and let's translate the code. "Make your farms flourish" means promoting the Monsanto - Dow Chemical approach to agriculture - GMOs and pesticides and patent rights controlled by international agribusiness corporations. "Let water flow" probably refers to the U.S. corporate approach to water, as seen in Bolivia with Bechtel (as per the recent Bond movie, as well). "Feeding hungry minds" probably refers to the massive propaganda campaigns carried out by USAID, the Peace Corp and others - in order to convince poor countries to sign on to IMF/World Bank deals - those were great for Chad, where a $4 billion World Bank-Exxon pipeline has led to even more warfare and environmental destruction. The same goes for Nigeria.

This one is a bit much:
"As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains."

Not a word about an illegal war for oil, not a word about Iraq's 1 million dead and 4 million refugees, or about the false claims that led to the war. Not a word about the thousands of dead and wounded U.S. soldiers, who were used to seize oilfields for the benefit of oily billionaires - and NOT A WORD ABOUT WITHDRAWING FROM IRAQ.

This one gave me the giggles: Manifest Destiny
"As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains."

It was nice to see Obama call for renewable energy and freedom from foreign oil - but that's what every president since Nixon has said - GW Bush said it about a dozen times - recall his pledges on the "hydrogen economy?"

Ach. If Obama keeps this up, he will face the biggest political backlash in U.S. history - and he might want to recall another Lincoln quote:

" You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Re:"Our nation is at war... Posted by: chance garden
Winning Two Lotteries
Posted by: jimswanson on Jan 21, 2009 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
James A. Swanson
www.bushleagueofnations.com [For FREE download of entire book]

“White House” has accurately described the residence of America’s presidents for more than two centuries, although “White Man House” would have been even more apt.

A black man and his black family reside in America’s White House, and W is virtually railroaded out of town—what a wonderful day!

I feel like I’ve won two Super Lotteries.

But electing Obama was the easy part. The hard work begins today, and again each new day. Let’s redouble our efforts.

If Obama is left alone without massive grassroots support and direction, it will be done wrong, or not at all.

Big Oil, Big Insurance, Big Media, Big Pharma—the list goes on—and their well-funded lobbyists have not left town. Neither has a host of Republican Neanderthals.

Also, the Republican wing of the Democratic Party—the so-called DINOs and Blue Dog Democrats—can be counted on for reactionary mischief.

Progressive transformation of America must be driven from the grassroots up, not from the top down by business-as-usual career politicians like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, whom we trust at our peril.

We must keep our friends close, our enemy closer, and our Democratic leaders closest.

Jim Swanson
“The Bush League of Nations”
www.bushleagueofnations.com [For FREE download of entire book]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did you see Jon Stewart's send up of Obama's speech?
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Jan 21, 2009 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where he read parts of it in Bush-speak? "We will not apologize for out way of life!"

That's what that Bush Press Secretary said, as well, right?

Try reading the whole speech in Bush voiceover - could he have said the same things?

This president will provide plenty of material for the comedians - no worries about their future employment...

What's a king without a jester, anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yeah...here's the real definition of responsibility and sacrifice:
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jan 21, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we (the taxpayers) will continue to sacrifice for those responsible for the mess we're in.



i'll believe it is something different when:

1.there is real financial relief for the poor and middle-class (coulda used that bail out money to wipe out consumer credit debt and student loans - that woulda been stimulus)

2. high tax rates (94% just like back in the good ol' 50s) for the top 1%, without the loopholes that allow top wealth holders to avoid income taxes entirely

3. ending of at least one American occupation of another country and withdrawal of forces (without redeploying them to the other occupation)

4. REAL health care for all of us (the non-for- profit single-payer kind) - none of this within the current paradigm that will only enrich the insurance industry while offering nothing to us.

5. good jobs with real living wages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BJH
Posted by: BJH on Jan 21, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama’s inaugural address calls on Americans to unite together and defeat its enemies. First, America is defined once more as a nation at war with the enemy now being a “network of violence and hatred.” Next there is the enemy of economic hardship to be defeated by Obama’s big plan for government programs and by people working harder and not questioning the market-based economy (or its networks).

The third enemy is at home amongst us and potentially within each of us. Obama tells Americans to gather together and choose “unity of purpose over conflict and discord.” Since when was democracy about everyone agreeing with each other? With his attempt to marginalize “cynics” as irrelevant we must ask whom Obama will brand and label next. Will any expression of dissent about official utterances be dismissed and cast aside? Will the nation become a de facto one party state? Perhaps that’s what some of his “dusting off” is about – throwing differing viewpoints into the dustbin. Cynicism is presented as something to reject in others and in ourselves. What next – skepticism, criticism, debate? Citizens are admonished to fall in line, to accept a politics of decisiveness, of conformity rather than one of thoughtfulness and discourse.

Obama asks Americans to join in the task of “remaking” America. At the same time, he asks them to embrace a continuance of their nation’s heritage; in other words, “remaking” is about more of the same old America, not building a new America. Obama warns that this remaking will not be easy as the people face “common dangers”; all the people have to do is be good and maintain hope for a better day while all of this war and hardship continues. Finally America, remember that you have a mission and that God is on your side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obama's the real cynic Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: BJH Posted by: Bibsisis
Jon Stewart nailed it last night
Posted by: cmaciain on Jan 21, 2009 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone sees Stewart's The Daily Show, you will see in the first segment, Stewart running clips from Obama's speech and bits of the Shrub's speeches.

They used similar phrasing, almost the EXACT SAME words! Same spiel, same rhetoric.

Laughed my tail off.

Inspired speech indeed.

Stewart rocks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Won't it all be fun? Posted by: Beck
» RE: Won't it all be fun? Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Won't it all be fun? Posted by: Bibsisis
Beware the owning class dude... when a rich man speaks...
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 21, 2009 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...of "sacrifice" he always means, those beneath him will be doin' all the sacrificin'.

undrgrndgirl said it best upthread though.

All I heard in this speech was: "status quo, status quo, status quo, belligerent 'Merkaaner exceptionalism, status quo, status quo, oh yeah, you poor people, suck it up, you get to pay for it all over again, only now your children's children's children are our slaves too. And you best thank us or we'll beat your ass down worse than the lass time."

I'm so very hopeful about all this change.... nine-eleven..terrishs...hope..change...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Humbled?
Posted by: BJH on Jan 21, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama starts "I stand here today humbled ..."

Do people with real humility talk about how humble they are?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Humbled? Posted by: tony_opmoc
The Function of the Democratic Party in the Political System- Part One
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 21, 2009 3:44 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democratic Party plays an indispensable role in society's political machinery. This doesn't mean it has any power, in terms of controlling the state or setting policy. It means that without the existence of the Dem Party, the US could no longer maintain the pretense that it's a "democracy." If the Dem Party disintegrated, the US would be revealed for what it really is -- a one-party state ruled by a narrow alliance of business interests.

In terms of defending the general population against the depredations of this business consortium, the Dem Party gave up the ghost in the mid-1960's. Their threadbare act as the "Party of the People" serves not to defend the well-being of the population, but merely to persuade ordinary citizens that within the official political system's framework, there's at least some faint hope for eventual progressive change. Their focus is not so much being on our side, as convincing us that they're on our side -- without the slightest serious examination of what that might entail.

The party's true function is thus largely theatrical. It doesn't exist to fight for change, but only to pose as a force which one fine distant day might possibly bestir itself to fight for change. Thus the whole magic of the Dem Party -- the essential service it renders to the US power structure -- lies not in what it does, but in its mere existence: by simply existing, and doing nothing, it pretends to be something it's not; and this is enough to relieve despair & to let the system portray itself as a "democracy."

As long as the Dem Party exists, most Americans will believe we have a "democracy" and a "choice" in how we are ruled. They will not despair, and will not revolt, as long as they have this hope for "change within the system." From the system's point of view, this mechanism serves as the ultimate safety valve -- it insures against a despairing populace, thus eliminates the threat of rebellion; yet guarantees that no serious change to the system will be mounted, because the Dems weren't designed to play that role in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Demo-Repub stiffs DONT READ THIS! Posted by: chance garden
The Function of the Democratic Party in the Political System- Part Two
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 21, 2009 3:45 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aren't the Dems The Lesser Evil?

The Democrats are not the "lesser evil;" they are an auxiliary subdivision of the same evil. To understand the political system, one must step back and regard its operation as an integrated whole. The system can't be properly understood if one's study of it begins with an uncritical acceptance of the 2-party system, and the conventional characterizations of the two parties. (Indeed, the fact that society encourages one to view it in this latter way, is perhaps a warning that this perspective should not be trusted.)

Any given piece of reactionary legislation is invariably supported by a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats. Does this show that the Democrats are "less evil?" If one focuses on the noble efforts of the few outspoken dissenters, it's easy to feel that the Democrats are somewhat less evil. But in the larger picture, Democrats invariably submit to what Republicans more ardently promulgate, & the entire range of official opinion thereby shifts to the right. Thus the overall function of Democrats is not so much to fight, as to quasi-passively participate in this ever-rightward-moving process. Just as the Harlem Globetrotters need their Washington Generals to make their basketball games properly entertaining, Republicans need the Democrats for effective staging of the political show.

The Democrats are permitted to exist because their vague hint of eventual progressive change keeps large numbers of people from bolting the political system altogether. Emma Goldman once said, "If voting made a difference, it would be illegal." Similarly, if the Democrats potentially threatened any sort of serious change, they would be banned. The fact that they are fully accepted by the corporations and political establishment tells us at once that their ultimate function must be wholly in line with the interests of those ruling groups.

Doesn't the presence of the Dennis Kuciniches, Cynthia McKinneys, et al "prove" that the Democrats are progressive? No. The Kuciniches and McKinneys are indeed significantly different from the Hillary types -- but there are compelling reasons not to get too excited about them, either. First, they are used by the party as a "Left decoration," simply to keep potential left defectors in tow. Secondly, the party power brokers will NEVER in a million years let the Kucinich-McKinney faction have any real power.

In other words, the very modestly-sized progressive Dem faction is cynically used as a marketing tool by the national party. They are dangled before your eyes to make you think that the Dems are the "lesser evil" (since the Republicans offer no such Left decorations). The existence of a few decent Dems makes no real difference in the overall alignment of the party, and they will never be internally influential. They are a distraction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Such nonsense! Posted by: PaulC
The Function of the Democratic Party in the Political System- Part Three
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 21, 2009 3:54 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can Progressives "Take Over" the Dem Party?

The argument is often advanced by progressives that they might be able to "take over" the Dem Party. This is wishful thinking, and ignores the actual history and character of both parties.

The Republicans were always the party of Wall Street & Northern manufacturing. The Democrats were the party of the Southern slaveocracy. When the national Democrats defied southern racism by passing the Civil Rights Acts in the mid '60's, the southern states bolted, destroying the New Deal coalition. The Republicans profited from this by adapting to southern tastes, values, & religious/cultural conceptions.

But this was in no way out of character for the Republicans. The far right was able to take over the Republican Party because that kind of alliance was always very much in the nature of the Republican Party anyway. Forming an alliance with fascists, racists & religious zealots ADVANCED the big-business agenda.

By contrast, for progressives to take over the Democrats would be an unprecedented departure from the party's character. To understand this, one must first recognize that the sole Dem claim to being progressive is rooted almost entirely in the New Deal, itself a response to a unique crisis in American history. FDR recognized that to avert the very real threat of massive social unrest and instability, significant concessions had to be made to the working class by the ruling class. Government could act to defend the weak, and to some extent to rein in the strong, but this was all in the long term interests of defending the existing social order.

Before FDR, the Dem Party had no progressive record whatsoever; and after FDR, though the New Deal coalition survived until the mid-1960's, it did so with a record of achievement that was restrained compared to the 1930's. After passing Medicare in 1965 the party reverted to its longterm pattern, and since then, there has again been no progressive record to speak of. The party's progressive social reform was thus concentrated mostly in the 1930's, with some residual momentum lasting until the mid 60's. The party's "progressive period" was thus 1) an exception to the longer term pattern; 2) a response to a unique crisis; and 3) has in any case been dead for over 40 years.

The word "progressive" refers to the commitment of a political party to defend the interests of the working class (aka the overwhelming majority of the population) against the depredations of the ruling elite. Not only is the Democratic Party unable and unwilling to engage in such a fight, it is unwilling even to pronounce the fight's name -- "class warfare." Marx is understandably reviled by capitalists for his annoyingly accurate perception that the capitalist class and the rest of the population have a fundamental conflict of interest. Capital seeks only to maximize its return; return can certainly be enhanced by using the machinery of state to transfer costs and burdens to the weak and vulnerable; thus rule by capital is intrinsically inimical to the basic interests of the majority of the population. There is no escaping this reality.

For the Democratic Party to even begin to serve as a vehicle for opposing the absolute rule of capital, it would at a minimum have to be capable of acknowledging the conflict that exists between the interests of capital and the rest of the population; and of expressing a principled determination to take the side of the population in this conflict.

A party whose controlling elements are millionaires, lobbyists, fund-raisers, careerist apparatchiks, consultants, and corporate lawyers; that has stood by prostrate and helpless (when not actively collaborating) is not likely to take that position.

LINK

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In response to writer7's "Can Any Of You Naysayers..."
Posted by: watching-n-waiting on Jan 21, 2009 5:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
writer7 Thank-you for the outburst. I've scrolled through the posts and all I can say (this is difficult to type because my pulse is racing) if this is the best America has to offer- if THIS whiny, arrogant, mean-spirited, counter-productive nastiness is the cream of the progressive crop than no wonder America is in the state it's in!
There's much I want to say but I'm going to have to go off into a quiet corner and think it through...I want to get it right, to get the bitching-moaner-groners to just S-T-O-P for one second and try to feel a skerrick of joy!
I know we've had 8 llloong, hard years of absolute hell. But I look at these posts and I see that (forget the war and economy- JUST FOR A SECOND) the worst damage The Shrub-n-Co. did was he made us into a bunch of self pitying whiners!
I'm a Kucinich progressive (I'd have opened a vein for him- and pretty damn near did!) but America wasn't ready for him. If we were we'd have elected him. We have to face up to what America is NOT: a democracy, it never was. America is an experiment in trying to BECOME a democracy. To complain about the election of a centrist with dark skin is insane! It is a wonderful occasion! It means we are one step closer to becoming BETTER! We can't whine ourselves to the left, whining isn't clever; it's EASY to criticize; it's more difficult to contribute. It's no great insight to call Obama a centrist as if you're the first person to have that insight! Yes, Obama is a centrist. Hell after 8 years of being so far right that it was impossible to find what was "left" of the country I'll take it! And I like my center black! This is not a compromise...it's what we got...it's WHAT 70 some odd percent of us chose, a big, beautiful black centrist!
I cried tears of pure joy when I saw on the TV people around the world looking to this man, seeing themselves and feeling PERHAPS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THIER LIVES like a part of the world , a world that craps on them e-v-e-r-y s-i-n-g-l-e day of their poverty stricken lives. I looked at their joy filled faces and I thought "we gave that to them and THAT is a good thing that we did!"
Do I want more? Of course I want more! Do I want different?! Of course I want different! I wanted more and different in 2000! I wanted it in 2004! But not enough of us got up off our counches to demand it- so we got screwed instead. Obama IS NOT another "screwing". Obama is a step forward, a big beautiful black, intelligent, articulate, gracious, poised man of a step forward! I'm just going to type until I run out of space...I am so overjoyed to have a statesperson in the oval office again- would I rather it be Cynthia McKinney? OF COURSE! But we just had a presidential election that WASN'T stolen by Rove. Stop complaining and enjoy that fact!
We were/are so COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY BROKEN that if Obama is "the best we could come up with" I'd say we did pretty damned alright for ourselves! And whether we like it or not, whether we agree with it or not America IS a big influence on the rest of the world (personally I'm sick to death of America being sheriff) and now there are a whole lot of people out there who on Jan 19th felt like "the other" but who on the 20th felt like an equal- imagine that! When I do I cry tears of profound joy. President Barack Obama cannot be everything to all people. He can only be what he is...our elected president. The Executive is 1/3 of our government. The house and senate was just as broken. The DOJ is a former shadow of itself. Barack Obama is a good, decent man, he is also a clever, tactical politician who- if given half a chance to shine the way he has proven he can (admit it there have been glimmers of brilliance) could become one hell of a great leader. But that's actually more up to us than it is up to him! That's how a democracy works and it's one of the reasons we have yet to become one. Space full-I'm off to think about this more thoroughly...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks. Posted by: Beck
Who wrote most of Obama's inauguration speech?
Posted by: FREE SPEECH on Jan 21, 2009 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a 27 year old, and he drafted it inside of a freaking STARBUCKS. Doh!

Still I hope that Obama can help to pull the nation out of the terrible morass in to which it is sinking. As we all know though one man can't do it all, and it's best to avoid the "Messiah syndrome" wherein we all hope and pray that the 'Savior Obama' can fix all of these problems singlehandedly, because that's obviously not going to happen...it's going to take collective action to help pull America out of this pit. However, it helps that Obama at least has the intelligence and hopefully the idealism needed to lead the nation to better times. I wish him luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try and Visualise What Is Going on is Like a Control Knob That Goes From 0-7
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jan 21, 2009 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney got hold of the knob and wound it up to 7 - and it wouldn't go any further

So he changed the laws of maths

And now the knob went from 1-8

So Cheney got it to number 8 and it wouldn't go any further

So Cheney got his stencils out and he asked Lynn to paint some more numbers on the dial

And Lynn said well I've got them round to 15 - but I have now got a barrier

We are back to 0 where we started.

And so Dick just rips the fucking knob off the dial

And says "I am Going To Seriously Fuck Those Cunts"

And Obama has not only disabled the mad bastard - and retrieved the knob

He's also put the knob back on the dial

Don't complain about what number it is pointing at

Give the Man a Chance

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Making Sacrifices
Posted by: kagu632418 on Jan 21, 2009 7:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama can eat his own words .. this country is in a recession and he had an Inauguration full of Pump and glitz ! Most of all the majority of the Inauguration cost was financed by fat cat Bankers which profited from Obamas "Bailout Money"

His mouth and his feet just don't match ! Thank God I am not alone in the way I feel about wasting our hard earned money on 10 Inauguration Balls etc etc ... The Polls don't lie - every State shows the same results:It was overdone considering our current dire situation ... Obama should lead by example - His fluff speeches don't mean a damn thing as far as I am conerned ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Making Sacrifices Posted by: watching-n-waiting
» RE: Making Sacrifices Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Thanx Bibsisis Posted by: watching-n-waiting
» RE: Making Sacrifices Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Get Off Beck's Back
Posted by: Bibsisis on Jan 21, 2009 8:26 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least, Beck is capable of thought and writing. Barry is one of Obama's nicknames which he was called in high school, college, and law school. Michelle probably calls him Barry. It's not a pejorative term, rather, a friendly nickname, but you Obama detractors are not permitted to use it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOW TO SEARCH FOR TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA' "POSIBILITIES" AND TEAM'S NEATNESS
Posted by: Artra on Jan 21, 2009 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at Tom Heneghan site and tell please what you honestly know.

http://blogs.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stand and Deliver Cheney - You Can Let Off Bush If You Want
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jan 21, 2009 9:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But We are Having THAT Cunt on Trial For a Start

We will Get Anthony Charles Lynton Blair

Delivered To Your Interrogation Centre at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba as soon as you request it - providing That Fidel Castro approves

Otherwise we will have him on Trial For War Crimes Against Humanity in The International Court of Justice in the Hague

Love & Peace

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Abroad
Posted by: noir on Jan 22, 2009 6:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got up at 3:30 a.m. to watch on the inauguration on the tube, which made me feel, all bleary like, at one with the innumerable steely courageous Americans Who Built America alluded to more than once by Obama. And of course the whole thing was wonderful to me. How long has it been since I even watched this usually boringly ritualised event? Obama was in great form, pitched his speech just right, I thought. I'm especially glad that he got in an eco reference, and I liked it when he included "unbelievers" along with Christians, etc. (A more positive sounding term would have been appreciated, but in all honesty I can't think of one that's in the common parlance anyway, so...) And I loved the numerous not terribly veiled allusions to the ongoing debacle of the Bush administration. Most of all I loved, thrilled to, the spectacle of the real America thronging that mall in such no-bullshit-we-mean-it numbers. At last we could behold a multitudinously microcosmic sample of the vibrant polyglot nation so many of us have known the US to be for a long time, but that Republicans and suchlike vanilla pipedreamers have been denying and obscuring (and worse! of course) for generations. The images of America in all its brilliant ethnic plumage will imprint indelibly on the national imagination now, I really believe.

Wasn't Aretha dynamic, glorious, uberarethra? How long has it been since I fellt like singing that otherwise mundane old "'Tis of Thee" anthem they forced down my schoolboy larynx decades ago? And the Yo Yo Ma group doing "Simple Gifts," one of my favorite old shape note hymns? Perfect keynote. I thought the poet was good too. She didn't try for sonorousness-- wisely, as she doesn't have the voice. But the poem was really well conceived in summoning to prominence ordinary people, workers.

All terrific for a Yank overseas; I've been one for 35 years. As someone has written to the likes of us expates on Alternet, we can now take those maple leafs off our backpacks.

But my God, best of all was Rev. Lowery. How must Obama have felt, the greatest orator of his time being oratorically upstaged at his own inauguration? I intend no disrespect to the mighty O, but by the time the eloquently intoned, sublimely with-it benediction was through I wanted that old man who could hardly walk to be the new president instead.

A wondrous political occasion, for once. Today the political scene feels like communality. One of my oldest friends has written to me of crying during Pete Seeger's rendition of "This Land is Your Land"--Guthrie's original version, incorporating the protest verses ordinarily deleted (http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/snd/thisland.html)--in one of the lead up concerts. Were I not so incorrigibly macho I myself might even have gone a bit lachrymose today, more than once. We all needed this, and we need as much more of it as events to come will allow us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American Abroad Posted by: Bibsisis
It's More than a Simple Equation, Mr/Ms Simple Equation
Posted by: Bibsisis on Jan 22, 2009 9:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The change you speak of NOT having is two days into President Obama's administration. The Federal Reserve and bankrupting of America you speak of were brought about by the Bush-non-administration, and the economic woes of our country sliding down a long hill into a swamp, are the direct result, first and foremost,of Dumbya's illegal, immoral, preemptive war on Iraq which never attacked us. That's where the billions went, leaving our nation without jobs, without aid of National Guard during maelstromic events like Hurricane Katrina when the NG is supposed to take care of people at home.

Get your facts straight and give Obama a chance!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton told us we must sacrifice after GH Bush
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Jan 22, 2009 10:21 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We did but our infrastructure is still ignored.

We must once again sacrifice after the "lying lips and war" GW Bush to pay off the huge debt, etc.

Clinton taxed the upper elite rich why not Obama? The billionaires can pay their own Social Security and support the democracy which made them rich. Go back to the Clinton tax schedule or we can't pay to run our government.

Obama has a plan for Empire like Carter (go after Russia, etc). He's not the same man though when it comes to spending less, etc. Obama and his wife both had very expensive designer clothes on. The two girls go to private school. They got rich running for President. To tell us to cut back and live on less is mockery. He is a hypocrit.

We wouldn't have to suffer so much if we weren't in unending wars against so called "terrorists". We would have more money if we weren't supporting huge immigration. We would have more money if Congress had not approved the $700 billion to banks..even in foreign lands. Heck with the bankrupt seniors who can't pay their bills now homeless. Heck with the out of work citizens who lost their jobs to off shore workers. They too lost their homes and are bankrupt. The Vets came home to no jobs and some never to be the same again from a false lie of terrorists.

The "economic terrorists" have us on our knees. It is gone and not accountable. It's our money and the Bush gang stole it as they left office (with Congressional approval and lies).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PaulC says it best...
Posted by: Bibsisis on Jan 22, 2009 10:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In these past two days of exultation and hope, we who share the ideals of President Obama are insulted by the insensitivity of the ignorant, the disoriented, the disenchanted, the deprived, the nutcases, the rightwingnuts, the uneducated, and the unloved.

These sociopaths would be posting the same shit if McCain had been elected. I am paying no more attention to the crazies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Obama
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Jan 25, 2009 9:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Obama wasn't that what we in Illinois sent you to DC to do...clean up the mess six years ago? Now that you have power do all we asked since then.

We want out of the illgal wars for oil and Empire, our borders closed, WTO and NAFTA gone which has destroyed our jobs and manufacturing base.

We want our rights back now as promised.

We want good jobs, jobs, jobs. Not just for immigrants and professionals from foreign lands doing our jobs cleaper.

We didn't do it so why should we be responsible for DC ignoring us? We have been working long hours and taking pay cuts. We have been suffering. Did you not notice?

Get to work in DC. Your policies ruined it for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement