COMMENTS: 130
Did You Know 200,000 Vets Are Sleeping on the Streets?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2008 headlines via email.
SAN FRANCISCO - Roy Lee Brantley shivers in the cold December morning as he waits in line for food outside the Ark of Refuge mission, which sits amid warehouses and artists lofts a stone's throw from the skyscrapers of downtown San Francisco.
Brantley's beard is long, white and unkempt. The African-American man's skin wrinkled beyond his 62 years. He lives in squalor in a dingy residential hotel room with the bathroom down the hall. In some ways, his current situation marks an improvement. "I've slept in parks," he says, "and on the sidewalk. Now at least I have a room."
Like the hundreds of others in line for food, Brantley has worn the military uniform. Most, like Brantley, carry their service IDs and red, white and blue cards from the Department of Veterans Affairs in their wallets or around their necks. In 1967, he deployed to Vietnam with the 1st Cavalry Division of the U.S. Army. By the time he left the military five years later, Brantley had attained the rank of sergeant and been decorated for his valor and for the wounds he sustained in combat.
"I risked my life for this democracy and got a Bronze Star," he says. "I shed blood for this country and got the Purple Heart after a mortar blast sent shrapnel into my face and leg. But when I came back home from Vietnam I was having problems. I tried to hurt my wife because she was Filipino. Every time I looked at her I thought I was in Vietnam again. So we broke up."
In 1973, Brantley filed a disability claim with the federal government for mental wounds sustained in combat overseas. Over the years, the Department of Veterans Affairs has denied his claim five separate times. "You go over there and risk your life for America and your mind's all messed up, America should take care of you, right," he says, knowing that for him and the other veterans in line for free food that promise has not been kept.
On any given night 200,000 U.S. veterans sleep homeless on the streets of America. One out of every four people -- and one out of every three men -- sleeping in a car, in front of a shop door, or under a freeway overpass has worn a military uniform. Some like Brantley have been on the streets for years. Others are young and women returning home wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan, quickly slipping through the cracks.
For each of these homeless veterans, America's promise to "Support the Troops" ended the moment he or she took off the uniform and tried to make the difficult transition to civilian life. There, they encountered a hostile and cumbersome bureaucracy set up by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In a best-case scenario, a wounded veteran must wait six months to hear back from the VA. Those who appeal a denial have to wait an average of four and a half years for their answer. In the six months leading up to March 31st of this year, nearly 1,500 veterans died waiting to learn if their disability claims would be approved by the government.
There are patriotic Americans trying to solve this problem. Last month, two veterans' organizations, Vietnam Veterans of America and Veterans of Modern Warfare, filed suit in federal court demanding the government decide disability claims brought by wounded soldiers within three months. Predictably, however, the VA is trying to block the effort. On December 17, their lawyers convinced Reggie Walton, a judge appointed by President Bush, who ruled that imposing a quicker deadline for payment of benefits was a task for Congress and the president-not the courts.
President-elect Barack Obama has the power to end this national disgrace. He has the power to ensure to streamline the VA bureaucracy so it helps rather than fights those who have been wounded in the line of duty. He can ensure that this latest generation of returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan does not receive the bum rap the Vietnam generation got. Let 2008 be the last year thousands of homeless veterans stand in line for free food during the holiday season. Let it be the last year hundreds of thousands sleep homeless on the street.
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2008 headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zgregz on Jan 3, 2009 12:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What CYA means is "cover your ass." In other words don't do anything that might be put on your personnel record, and would screw you up for a promotion. This obviously concerns something negative, but oddly will also include many positive actions you might take if you had a conscience. For example, you see a buddy with a real psychological problem festering and out of concern report it to a superior. Army practice requires this be your immediate supervisor, but SGT Rock feels if he reports up the chain of command that some where it will #1 piss off the guy above him ( Demerit on personnel record? ) or should it go higher the division commander might get his ass in the wringer, at which time EVERYONE down the line will pay for the black mark on his record. The net result is NOTHING gets taken care of other than expected military bull.
Did any one get their head out of their ass to make sure troops had the new ceramic inserts for the body armor --NOPE. When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in 2001 did any one do anything -- other than take the info off the internet -- NOPE. When Pat Tillman was killed by his own men did any Army official try to uncover the truth? --NOPE! Problem is the system is designed for the exact result you see time and time again, cover up -- shut up -- keep up that shiny exterior so the Commander in Chief doesn't look like the nimrod he is, cause THEN the shit would roll down hill.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: willymack
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: aussidawg
» When you add up all they did to harm the soldiers, all of it... you begin to see...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: When you add up all they did to harm the soldiers, all of it... you begin to see...
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: MY TAKE ON CYA
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: CYA
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» "support our troops" just an empty propaganda slogan
Posted by: texasrodeoqueen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 3, 2009 4:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the late 1980s, homelessness in had swollen to 600,000 on any given night – and 1.2 million over the course of a year. Many were Vietnam veterans, children and laid-off workers.
The single most devastating thing Reagan did to create homelessness was when he cut the budget for the Department of Housing and Urban Development by three-quarters, from $32 billion in 1981 to $7.5 billion by 1988. The department was the main governmental supporter of subsidized housing for the poor. Add this to Reagan’s overhaul of tax codes to reduce incentives for private developers to create low-income homes and you had a major crisis for low-income families and individuals. Under Reagan, the number of people living beneath the federal poverty line rose from 24.5 million in 1978 to 32.5 million in 1988.
And the number of homeless people went from something so little it wasn’t even written about widely in the late 1970s to more than 2 million when Reagan left office. (Democracy Now)
A Disquisition on Bubbles
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: if you are interested in the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Another achievement of the Republican Revolution
Posted by: madmax427
» RE: Another achievement of the Republican Revolution
Posted by: aussidawg
» Take this a step further... supposing your agenda as an elite of this country....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Another achievement of the Republican Revolution
Posted by: Quannah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aislinnluv on Jan 3, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen 07 on Jan 3, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they are no longer useful, they are no better than the rest of the civilian trash.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Enlistment is a short-term welfare program for the poor.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
Comments are closed-
» RE: go figure?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Not Sad to the CEO's Making Money
Posted by: nobyjingo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Jan 3, 2009 5:34 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The controversial drug MDMA - known to recreational users as 'ecstasy' - can help ease the effects of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to the first phase-II clinical trial into the potential therapeutic benefits of using the drug as an adjunct to psychotherapy.
I just discovered and posted a few days ago that the Israel mafia has an interest in the 'ecstasy' market.
Keeping it illegal keeps it profitable, it also keeps all those soldiers drunk and drug abusing on the street. It is a conspiracy to defraud and destroy the strength of our country in every way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why does the mental health industry/federal government WANT them fucked up?
Posted by: Sandlinx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: madmax427 on Jan 3, 2009 5:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
EVERYONE is ONLY interested in Their OWN little problem(s)! the "Let Him or Her, fight for what They want & I'll fight for Mine". The fallacy of this is lost on Our Ignorant response to it! The Truth that IF We banded TOGETHER to SOLVE ONE Major problem at a time (like ALL of Us), We COULD NOT be "managed" or "handled" by the "system"! After a VERY short period of time EVEN Our "Government" would get the message! But fear not, Our 'I'll get Mine, You get Yours' attitude will CONTINUE & Our "Government will keep on screwing Us over, one LITTLE Group at a time!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Chloe2005
» RE: We had enclaves of new immigrants who lived within their group (Italians, Germans, Swedes, etc)
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DanYHKim on Jan 3, 2009 5:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless and until the government significantly improves its treatment of veterans… they will have to keep looking to one another for help, as they always have.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The American Veterans and Servicemembers Survivial Guide
Posted by: bccmeteorites
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jan 3, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite "veterans' preference" in hiring, vets are too often seen as armed and crazy, and end up living the combat-trained life in the woods because they can't afford housing while un/underemployed.
Substance abuse levels among vets--horrifying, and because of the reimbursement problem, a substantial waiting list exists for substance abuse residential treatment. This problem is the major cause of homelessness among vets: self-medicating for PTSD and for pain from service-related injuries.
Anecdotally, an acquaintance of mine has just been diagnosed with advanced prostate CA. VA examined him for years but never bothered to run a PSA, a no-brainer basic for male patients over 50. Are the doctors impaired or just stupid?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Are the doctors impaired or just stupid?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Are the doctors impaired or just stupid? Go along to get along.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Jan 3, 2009 6:59 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bloomberg reports that the first female deans of the Harvard and Stanford law schools — Elena Kagan and Kathleen Sullivan — “are the top candidates to serve” as Barack Obama’s Solicitor General.
No woman has ever served in that position on a permanent basis. Kagan “became a top candidate for solicitor general after being passed over for deputy attorney general, a slot set to go to Washington lawyer David Ogden.”
The Solicitor General is charged with litigating on behalf of the government before the Supreme Court and determining whether lower court decisions should be appealed.
In the comments I found this,
Jackie Says:
but she’s not a jurist and she is a lesbian,
Miss Sullivan is a lesbian but Alito is a closet gay. Roberts wont say anything after he was caught with his girlfriend while on vacation and had that heart problem.
Both woman know Constitutional Law which is more then we had for 8 years with Ashcrof and Gonzo. It’s would be nice to see qualified people put in position for a change.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:45 am
Yes it's gossip, but it goes along with the whole Jeff Gannon story, which is sad but true, and covering up a huge conspiracy to commit fraud of the worst kind against the American people.
Truly, the cover-up is shocking. So everyone is under suspicion now, even our highest jurisprudence. In fact them most of all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 3, 2009 7:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jan 3, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 3, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Make our society nicer and save us all a lot of money.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Make our society nicer and save us all a lot of money.
Posted by: gandolfshep
» They gotta fund the police state and
Posted by: marid
» I agree
Posted by: marid
» RE: You know, legalizing Cannabis for the troops could help them recover physically and mentally.
Posted by: mtnprivy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jan 3, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They had a moral and legal duty to refuse to serve and kill innocent civilians around the globe.
These filthy animals don't deserve any sympathy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hold on there
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» Bad post
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Bad post; thanks, weathered. people are more ignorant about those in the military than anything
Posted by: Beck
» I disagree the post isn't bad . . . . . . . .
Posted by: Nightstallion
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: politicky
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: NAM67VET
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: aussidawg
» Thanks, Namvet. Give me anyone who risks and takes action over any computer neanderthal,
Posted by: Beck
» xcellent post!
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» A challenge for the anti-soldier people
Posted by: Beck
» RE: A challenge for the anti-soldier people
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: A challenge for the anti-soldier people
Posted by: gandolfshep
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Jan 3, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Abe,they use the Cult of Militarism to
Posted by: marid
» Thank Marid
Posted by: we_need_Abe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 3, 2009 9:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a Veteran and even I have not been able to find out even though I have been homeless and on the street for months. I have lived in shelters, doorways and under bridges. When I was compos mentis enough to ask why I would. I have never understood the answers! They are as many and sundry as the number of veterans in any given area.
NO VETERAN has ever answered me with what I felt was the complete truth. Most of these guys have told me in no uncertain terms that though they were treated wrongly it was because of SINGULAR individuals and not the System that was intended to serve them. Many told me it was because agency or agencies unnamed were singling them out PERSONALLY to deny them service. Some were even certain it was they who did something wrong that placed them in the predicament they find themselves in now. I was fortunate in that when I was on the street, I came to the conclusion that it was up to ME to get off it and into treatment for alcoholism and other things that had gone wrong with me.
I was a self starter in that at least! But, since I had got help by going to the Public Assistance route I was in eligible for Military service. That is now changing and is in a state of flux. The military however may NEVER decide in my favor in my case. I will not go back on the street again, this time if I fall I am headed for prison. I will not be ignored again. I will do whatever is required of me to make sure THIS time in lands in a Newspaper.
Aaron Glantz baby boy: I think you should check your sources about how many of us are on the street. Here in Washington State alone in Kitsap County there are over 20,000 veterans alone who will not even go to town to GET in the street.
I am a Nam Era Veteran, NO I personally was not in The Nam. However, in these woods out here from hells half acre in Forks to all kinds of little hidey holes are little knots of guys NOT just Nam Vet’s but Korea, Gulf war, Desert storm, Panama Invasion you name we got! What about them? These people are totally off the radar. Then God Help us there are the Survivalists!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Night, look up Smedley Butler and read his
Posted by: marid
» I'm impressed Madrid!
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» I already did Madrid. In 1969, 1970,1971,1972,1973, 1974, aw well shit you get the point . . . . .
Posted by: Nightstallion
» RE: Off my chest, out of my life into a finger stall for Congress' fundamental orifices!
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 3, 2009 10:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meanwhile, after I was told the quota of CO’s was filled for my County by some lying bitch, your fucking senators passed a law that made it a felony to dodge the draft and wrote the law so that if I was caught I would be given a choice to serve in some branch of the Military or go to Leavenworth Federal Prison. As if that wasn’t bad enough if I were caught and Joined as my option, then when I was discharged I would be given an undesirable discharge after three years of service! Well I joined before your fucking little prick MP’s who had been taught to hunt us could catch me.
So fuck you assholes fuck you all to hell and beyond! I have to listen to the judgmental prattling of fucking punks who were not even born yet about how I am a criminal for going into military service. You know shit! You know jack dick shit you little dickless wonders. With your jaded ass ignorant little opinions about why men go to war as if you fucking knew what the holy Christ you were talking about. Smarmy little prigs with dicks no larger than twigs and zero balls to boot!
Fuck a bunch of May Ann Coulters Cook that seamy bitch cunt on a spit and serve her up to this wasted ass congress that put GEORGE W. BUSH in charge of anything but cleaning toilets. The whole lot of them should be dragged out of the fucking halls of Congress and impaled on the front lawn. You have no fucking idea how pissed I am at you stupid, thoughtless, empty, shallow, gutless little prune faced fucks
You keep telling me how I should be proud or killed for being a Veteran and I am going to take my weaseley faggot ass into Rambo Mode and kick the dog shit out of some fool before I eat his liver in front of his family. Now, is that what it is going to take or will you assholes use a little sensitivity with the Vets who REALLY THOUGHT they were trying to help. Remember, in the same position even YOUR ASS COULD BE BRAINWASHED!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: drone
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: politicky
» RE: MeyravLevine
Posted by: politicky
» Intellectual morons?
Posted by: TennMom
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: Nightstallion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gandolfshep on Jan 3, 2009 10:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have sat in a waiting chair at the VA for 6 hours past my appointment time to see a doctor. God forbid I had to go to their emergency room. Then you have a two to four hour wait for you meds to be filled.
Are their 200,000? I don't know but I believe that maybe a bit conseravitive. I have been homeless many times and had over 100 different low paying jobs through out the years since returning home to spit and verbal abuse.
I see a homeless Vet almost everyday and feel a deep guilt when they ask for spare change and I can only afford a meal for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia - we killed at 3 million innocent people
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia - we killed at 3 million innocent people
Posted by: gandolfshep
» MeyravLevine, are you too young or merely too stupid
Posted by: TennMom
» RE: MeyravLevine, are you too young or merely too stupid
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: MeyravLevine has a similar choice, action AND jail
Posted by: Beck
» Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia - we killed at 3 million innocent people
Posted by: johnorford
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billwald on Jan 3, 2009 11:19 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do not many of them also have mental problems? If a person has a head cold he takes head cold meds and stops when he if feeling better. Many people with mental problems stop taking their meds when they feel better. Then they have a set back. Crazy people don't take their meds because they are not rational.
Our legal system has concluded that one has a constitution right to be crazy unless one is also an immediate threat to life or property. A potential threat 5 years down the road doesn't matter. Can't lock up a person because in 5 years he might stop taking his meds.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eagan also closed 90% of "mental" hospital beds.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: eagan also closed 90% of "mental" hospital beds.
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jan 3, 2009 11:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We have a long history
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Jan 3, 2009 2:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 3, 2009 2:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marizara on Jan 3, 2009 3:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jan 3, 2009 6:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its up to US!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: wormfarmer
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: wormfarmer
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 3, 2009 9:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always in all my years I have supported states rights over the Fed. Individual rights over State rule. The state cannot be right or wrong because a state is IMMORAL by its very nature. The blow that Individual rights suffered by Lincoln’s existence are immeasurable by any human standard.
I do not say that he needed assassination,but that he needed correction. Such correction that is improbable even today. We do not live in a civilization here we live in an Occupied Territory, A place where fewer than 23 % of the denizens have anything to say about governance let alone representation.
This is not a democracy, it never has been. It is a Religious Corporatocracy, which is a Chimera of Mammon and the worst brainwashing aspects of Christian Religion. On the surface of it this is not a good thing, and the infrastructure is based on demon worship on an unconscious level. ANY THING that is anti-life takes life without hope of replenishment. That used to be known as devil worship. The same things now are being called Justice in our American courts. Do you think that men could be suffering the death penalty on no solid evidence otherwise?
Do you truly believe some twit could be telling you are responsible for your own victimization otherwise? In a way she right you know, you are responsible for your victimization. After all you were the ones who manufactured your own leashes about what is loyalty and what isn’t!
Do you believe that you should continue to swallow these glib lies like some greased and nameless asshole? (Apologies Billy) Or do you think you should unleash the worst of us? The neural experiments, the mind control failures, the lobotomy cases the temporal lobe erasures, all the mad emotionless murderers used in Nam and Panama to rend tear and maim the civilians we were intended to preserve without your knowledge of us?
Welcome to the REAL black sleep you spineless whimpering simpering lemmings. Let us give you a taste of what our homeland gave us after the battle field; worse than betrayal, purposeful, painful, disrespectful, indifference! The ignominy of being ignored to death! Here we come sweeties you will know when we find you, and we will find you in broad daylight or in your beds at night.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Woah is this some harsh shit or what? Pinch me wake me up.
Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: Woah is this some harsh shit or what? Pinch me wake me up.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donl51 on Jan 3, 2009 11:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richard0a37 on Jan 4, 2009 1:20 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That means less than 10 homeless Vets per town, hardly earth shattering.
On the other hand,
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/ the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america.shtml tells us that:
Mental disorders are common in the United States and internationally. An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.
When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.
Even though mental disorders are widespread in the population, the main burden of illness is concentrated in a much smaller proportion — about 6 percent, or 1 in 17 — who suffer from a serious mental illness.
In addition, mental disorders are the leading cause of disability in the U.S. and Canada for ages 15-44.
Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time. Nearly half (45 percent) of those with any mental disorder meet criteria for 2 or more disorders, with severity strongly related to comorbidity.
It's all very well thrusting a large figure in front of your audience so they can throw their hands up in horror and disgust, but, taking the wider picture, you can see that, statistically, the number of homeless Vets is actually very small.
According to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16564208/
There were 744,000 homeless people in total in the United States in 2005, according to the first national estimate in a decade.
Besides, homelessness is the stuff of Hollywood movies. In the film 'Coming to America', Eddie Murphy pretends to be a crippled and homeless USA Vet. Every TV detective story is based on crime consequential to homelessness, poverty etc. In other words, it has become entertainment.
However, this article is written purely to cast further criticism on the Bush Administration, and not as a means to solving the problems of homelessness.
The image of the USA has been carefully constructed ever since someone looked through the lens of a movie camera and declared: 'we can really do something with this'. There must be hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of movies dedicated to presenting just the right image of USA since the beginning of the 20th century.
We just love the officer's uniform. It gives us a sense of pride, prestige, stability, power, confidence, virility, and at some stage in their careers, all movie stars play high ranking officers. Even Tom Cruise in 'Lions for Lambs' has his picture taken standing next to George W Bush and Condeleezza Rice, which also stars Robert Redford and Meryl Streep.
Hollywood films like to merge fantasy with reality, while the media endeavour to create pictures in our minds that suggest the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richard0a37 on Jan 4, 2009 1:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does no one ever think about anything else? Occasionally, I see a member of the armed services walking down the street in UK, but to me, he lives on a different planet, for I cannot imagine what has possessed him to join an institution whose prime purpose is to kill strangers.
It's almost as if the military has become a way of life with the US population in general. Here in UK, the Queen is the head of the armed services, and the public persona between her and the military is very Alice in Wonderland like. Here in UK, the military presence is very low key.
So it could be that the sabre rattling that the USA is forever engaged in across the planet is what has led to a surge in military activity by all other nations. If the US Military left all the nations it currently occupies, the odds are this would lead to a much healthier situation world wide.
It's the US Military who occupy other nations, not the other way round. If a criminal entered your house, you would not be able to rest. This is why everything that Bush says is a big fat lie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Obsessed with the military
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Adnihilo on Jan 4, 2009 9:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Volunteering to kill for a US Gov't regime's political agenda surely doesn't make an American 'patriotic'. If anything, it just means they're stupid or ignorant of reality. There is not a soldier alive or dead who ever fought for the freedom of any American born after WW 2. Except perhaps the Cuban Missile Crisis...
Patriotism doesn't come from picking up a gun to kill Government-designated 'enemies of the state'. If alleged 'patriotic' Americans stopped volunteering to kill for a gov't imperialistic political agenda the gov't would again be forcing Americans to kill for them... And that only leads to political and economic revolution - something this country desperately needs.. This would seem to indicate soldiers who volunteered to kill for our Gov't's political agendas were something other than 'patriotic' Americans...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jan 4, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jan 4, 2009 11:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank You all, but the horse is out of the barn. What if they held a war, and nobody came?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: In response to
Posted by: gandolfshep
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Jan 4, 2009 2:59 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NAM67VET on Jan 4, 2009 4:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the vets, whether Nam vets like me, doing flashbacks to how we coped with war and the "homecoming" we didn't get, or our young sisters and brothers coming back (and going again and again and again)to the same bullshit treatment by the same bullshit government, I say "Welcome Home!"
To the vets and to those who stand with us, I say, "Join VVAW or IVAW, and stand with veterans against the bullshit wars and for the wounded warriors."
To the mewling pukes who want to feel big by crapping on those who went to fight and left a piece of their souls overseas in a pool of horror and gore, I say what we said to the VFW and American Legion and the other right-wingers who didn't want us around: fuck you. We will take care of ourselves and one another, and you may picture yourselves as on the receiving end of a size 11 jungle combat boot being thrown at your head.
There. That's enough to make the old man feel better.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: parting words
Posted by: gandolfshep
Comments are closed-
Posted by: namguardianangel on Jan 4, 2009 6:53 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This came from the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans
How many homeless veterans are there?
Although accurate numbers are impossible to come by -- no one keeps national records on homeless veterans -- the VA estimates that nearly 200,000 veterans are homeless on any given night. And nearly 400,000 experience homelessness over the course of a year. Conservatively, one out of every three homeless men who is sleeping in a doorway, alley or box in our cities and rural communities has put on a uniform and served this country. According to the National Survey of Homeless Assistance Providers and Clients (U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness and the Urban Institute, 1999), veterans account for 23% of all homeless people in America.
http://www.nchv.org/background.cfm
While homeless veterans are a huge problem, what also needs to be part of the discussion is incarcerated veterans along with the devastating affects on the children of PTSD veterans when they don't know what it is. I really appreciate it when people shine the light on PTSD because the more they read about it, the greater the chance we can finally get some of this right. Two thirds of the population of America don't know what it is but over 7 million have it. The problem is, too many have it but don't know what it is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 876 on Jan 5, 2009 6:57 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good maybe these idiot patriots who are so happy to murder and tyrannize impoverished people will learn something and serve as a lesson to anyone who would follow in their foot steps. My sympathy lies with the devastated people of Iraq and Afghanistan not a bunch of entitled Americans. When was the last time Americans had any remorse for the misery they create for millions of people?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who cares?
Posted by: gandolfshep
» RE: Who cares?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 5, 2009 1:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you died 'over there' they raise a plaque to you and name bridges after you and schools. If you survive combat and abuse by other service personell,they shit all over you. Why?
Because the bastards make lots of money off of making our men and women into cold blooded killers for the President. Remember CONGRESS DID NOT DECLARE THIS WAR!!!!!! Bush did,as a family vendetta. If you don't know that you've been in a coma for the last twenty years.
Until this farce of a governance ever decides to start making policies that make vets and troops obsolete then this government isn't worth the time it takes to wipe your ass. That's what they're doing to us vets and
until we stop their idiocy...it's not going to stop.
If you think Obama's any better,you'd better go check yourself. So far all he is is talk.
Talking the Talk and Walking the walk,the same old shit falling out a brand new asshole.
I know that opinion won't sit too well with some folks,but, until he gives a 'serious econ-stimulus', to the working poor and starts talking about creating Peace without resulting to bloodshed. He's just another DC dope.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jcore77 on Jan 5, 2009 1:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David H Brooks has started this non profit foundation for all of those heroic Americans who have served and sacrificed in the name of freedom overseas and protection here at home.
David H Brooks foundation is a non profit organization that is geared towards helping American Soldiers and the extra help they need when they come back home.
- Health Care
- Medication
- Counseling
- Physical Therapy
- Housing Assistance
- Aiding the families of disabled survivors
and so much more...
All of this is made possible by the private funding of founder David H. Brooks, the Foundation for America's Wounded Heroes continues to touch hearts and lives every day.
David H. Brooks Founder DHB Industries has managed to save thousands of lives over the years of developing body armor technology and has developed an ongoing lifesaving legacy.
Over the years David H. Brooks has managed to develop cutting edge body armor technology and innovative solutions for the military and law enforcement professionals alike.
David H. Brooks is also involved in a humanitarian mission in Malawi in Africa offering generous donations to help aid the grief stricken areas, he also donates generously to multiple charities, and has managed to save a non profit organization “Ogen Shabbos” which helps thousands of homeless and needy people daily.
Recognition
David H. Brooks
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bob12386 on Jan 5, 2009 11:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Life in America is hard and when times get tough, sinking to the bottom is a rather simple matter without a support structure to prop you up.
Lose a job and run out of money and you're on the street. Once you're on the street, you say on the street.
Pretty simple really. Social darwinism at work.
Personally, I'm an unemployed vet and if I run out of money before I get a new job, I die. It's that simple.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jan 16, 2009 9:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A hugely disproportionate number of homeless veterans had suffered a brain injury during their service.
Homeless veterans frequently deal with many other illnesses and disorders such as eye problems, hypertension, cardiovascular problems, COPD/emphysema, tuberculosis, gastrointestinal problems, hepatic disease, neurologic disorders, orthopedic problems, skin problems, and trauma.
There is a huge population of veterans from our current war(s) who are coming back comorbid for PTSD and a head injury, and it's really important that we keep up pressure to give these guys the support they need and deserve.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zgregz on Jan 3, 2009 12:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What CYA means is "cover your ass." In other words don't do anything that might be put on your personnel record, and would screw you up for a promotion. This obviously concerns something negative, but oddly will also include many positive actions you might take if you had a conscience. For example, you see a buddy with a real psychological problem festering and out of concern report it to a superior. Army practice requires this be your immediate supervisor, but SGT Rock feels if he reports up the chain of command that some where it will #1 piss off the guy above him ( Demerit on personnel record? ) or should it go higher the division commander might get his ass in the wringer, at which time EVERYONE down the line will pay for the black mark on his record. The net result is NOTHING gets taken care of other than expected military bull.
Did any one get their head out of their ass to make sure troops had the new ceramic inserts for the body armor --NOPE. When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in 2001 did any one do anything -- other than take the info off the internet -- NOPE. When Pat Tillman was killed by his own men did any Army official try to uncover the truth? --NOPE! Problem is the system is designed for the exact result you see time and time again, cover up -- shut up -- keep up that shiny exterior so the Commander in Chief doesn't look like the nimrod he is, cause THEN the shit would roll down hill.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: willymack
» RE: When Donald Rumsfeld and the US Army cancelled the Army's order for mine resistant vehicles in
Posted by: aussidawg
» When you add up all they did to harm the soldiers, all of it... you begin to see...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: When you add up all they did to harm the soldiers, all of it... you begin to see...
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: MY TAKE ON CYA
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: CYA
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» "support our troops" just an empty propaganda slogan
Posted by: texasrodeoqueen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jan 3, 2009 4:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the late 1980s, homelessness in had swollen to 600,000 on any given night – and 1.2 million over the course of a year. Many were Vietnam veterans, children and laid-off workers.
The single most devastating thing Reagan did to create homelessness was when he cut the budget for the Department of Housing and Urban Development by three-quarters, from $32 billion in 1981 to $7.5 billion by 1988. The department was the main governmental supporter of subsidized housing for the poor. Add this to Reagan’s overhaul of tax codes to reduce incentives for private developers to create low-income homes and you had a major crisis for low-income families and individuals. Under Reagan, the number of people living beneath the federal poverty line rose from 24.5 million in 1978 to 32.5 million in 1988.
And the number of homeless people went from something so little it wasn’t even written about widely in the late 1970s to more than 2 million when Reagan left office. (Democracy Now)
A Disquisition on Bubbles
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: if you are interested in the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Another achievement of the Republican Revolution
Posted by: madmax427
» RE: Another achievement of the Republican Revolution
Posted by: aussidawg
» Take this a step further... supposing your agenda as an elite of this country....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Another achievement of the Republican Revolution
Posted by: Quannah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aislinnluv on Jan 3, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen 07 on Jan 3, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they are no longer useful, they are no better than the rest of the civilian trash.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Enlistment is a short-term welfare program for the poor.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
Comments are closed-
» RE: go figure?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Not Sad to the CEO's Making Money
Posted by: nobyjingo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Jan 3, 2009 5:34 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The controversial drug MDMA - known to recreational users as 'ecstasy' - can help ease the effects of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to the first phase-II clinical trial into the potential therapeutic benefits of using the drug as an adjunct to psychotherapy.
I just discovered and posted a few days ago that the Israel mafia has an interest in the 'ecstasy' market.
Keeping it illegal keeps it profitable, it also keeps all those soldiers drunk and drug abusing on the street. It is a conspiracy to defraud and destroy the strength of our country in every way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why does the mental health industry/federal government WANT them fucked up?
Posted by: Sandlinx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: madmax427 on Jan 3, 2009 5:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
EVERYONE is ONLY interested in Their OWN little problem(s)! the "Let Him or Her, fight for what They want & I'll fight for Mine". The fallacy of this is lost on Our Ignorant response to it! The Truth that IF We banded TOGETHER to SOLVE ONE Major problem at a time (like ALL of Us), We COULD NOT be "managed" or "handled" by the "system"! After a VERY short period of time EVEN Our "Government" would get the message! But fear not, Our 'I'll get Mine, You get Yours' attitude will CONTINUE & Our "Government will keep on screwing Us over, one LITTLE Group at a time!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Chloe2005
» RE: We had enclaves of new immigrants who lived within their group (Italians, Germans, Swedes, etc)
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Here's where "Change" really could do some good, BUT
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DanYHKim on Jan 3, 2009 5:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless and until the government significantly improves its treatment of veterans… they will have to keep looking to one another for help, as they always have.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The American Veterans and Servicemembers Survivial Guide
Posted by: bccmeteorites
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jan 3, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite "veterans' preference" in hiring, vets are too often seen as armed and crazy, and end up living the combat-trained life in the woods because they can't afford housing while un/underemployed.
Substance abuse levels among vets--horrifying, and because of the reimbursement problem, a substantial waiting list exists for substance abuse residential treatment. This problem is the major cause of homelessness among vets: self-medicating for PTSD and for pain from service-related injuries.
Anecdotally, an acquaintance of mine has just been diagnosed with advanced prostate CA. VA examined him for years but never bothered to run a PSA, a no-brainer basic for male patients over 50. Are the doctors impaired or just stupid?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Are the doctors impaired or just stupid?
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Are the doctors impaired or just stupid? Go along to get along.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Jan 3, 2009 6:59 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bloomberg reports that the first female deans of the Harvard and Stanford law schools — Elena Kagan and Kathleen Sullivan — “are the top candidates to serve” as Barack Obama’s Solicitor General.
No woman has ever served in that position on a permanent basis. Kagan “became a top candidate for solicitor general after being passed over for deputy attorney general, a slot set to go to Washington lawyer David Ogden.”
The Solicitor General is charged with litigating on behalf of the government before the Supreme Court and determining whether lower court decisions should be appealed.
In the comments I found this,
Jackie Says:
but she’s not a jurist and she is a lesbian,
Miss Sullivan is a lesbian but Alito is a closet gay. Roberts wont say anything after he was caught with his girlfriend while on vacation and had that heart problem.
Both woman know Constitutional Law which is more then we had for 8 years with Ashcrof and Gonzo. It’s would be nice to see qualified people put in position for a change.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:45 am
Yes it's gossip, but it goes along with the whole Jeff Gannon story, which is sad but true, and covering up a huge conspiracy to commit fraud of the worst kind against the American people.
Truly, the cover-up is shocking. So everyone is under suspicion now, even our highest jurisprudence. In fact them most of all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 3, 2009 7:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jan 3, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 3, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Make our society nicer and save us all a lot of money.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Make our society nicer and save us all a lot of money.
Posted by: gandolfshep
» They gotta fund the police state and
Posted by: marid
» I agree
Posted by: marid
» RE: You know, legalizing Cannabis for the troops could help them recover physically and mentally.
Posted by: mtnprivy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jan 3, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They had a moral and legal duty to refuse to serve and kill innocent civilians around the globe.
These filthy animals don't deserve any sympathy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hold on there
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» Bad post
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Bad post; thanks, weathered. people are more ignorant about those in the military than anything
Posted by: Beck
» I disagree the post isn't bad . . . . . . . .
Posted by: Nightstallion
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: politicky
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: NAM67VET
» RE: xcellent! These cannon fodder neanderthals are lucky they are not being tried for war crimes
Posted by: aussidawg
» Thanks, Namvet. Give me anyone who risks and takes action over any computer neanderthal,
Posted by: Beck
» xcellent post!
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» A challenge for the anti-soldier people
Posted by: Beck
» RE: A challenge for the anti-soldier people
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: A challenge for the anti-soldier people
Posted by: gandolfshep
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Jan 3, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Abe,they use the Cult of Militarism to
Posted by: marid
» Thank Marid
Posted by: we_need_Abe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 3, 2009 9:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a Veteran and even I have not been able to find out even though I have been homeless and on the street for months. I have lived in shelters, doorways and under bridges. When I was compos mentis enough to ask why I would. I have never understood the answers! They are as many and sundry as the number of veterans in any given area.
NO VETERAN has ever answered me with what I felt was the complete truth. Most of these guys have told me in no uncertain terms that though they were treated wrongly it was because of SINGULAR individuals and not the System that was intended to serve them. Many told me it was because agency or agencies unnamed were singling them out PERSONALLY to deny them service. Some were even certain it was they who did something wrong that placed them in the predicament they find themselves in now. I was fortunate in that when I was on the street, I came to the conclusion that it was up to ME to get off it and into treatment for alcoholism and other things that had gone wrong with me.
I was a self starter in that at least! But, since I had got help by going to the Public Assistance route I was in eligible for Military service. That is now changing and is in a state of flux. The military however may NEVER decide in my favor in my case. I will not go back on the street again, this time if I fall I am headed for prison. I will not be ignored again. I will do whatever is required of me to make sure THIS time in lands in a Newspaper.
Aaron Glantz baby boy: I think you should check your sources about how many of us are on the street. Here in Washington State alone in Kitsap County there are over 20,000 veterans alone who will not even go to town to GET in the street.
I am a Nam Era Veteran, NO I personally was not in The Nam. However, in these woods out here from hells half acre in Forks to all kinds of little hidey holes are little knots of guys NOT just Nam Vet’s but Korea, Gulf war, Desert storm, Panama Invasion you name we got! What about them? These people are totally off the radar. Then God Help us there are the Survivalists!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Night, look up Smedley Butler and read his
Posted by: marid
» I'm impressed Madrid!
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» I already did Madrid. In 1969, 1970,1971,1972,1973, 1974, aw well shit you get the point . . . . .
Posted by: Nightstallion
» RE: Off my chest, out of my life into a finger stall for Congress' fundamental orifices!
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 3, 2009 10:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meanwhile, after I was told the quota of CO’s was filled for my County by some lying bitch, your fucking senators passed a law that made it a felony to dodge the draft and wrote the law so that if I was caught I would be given a choice to serve in some branch of the Military or go to Leavenworth Federal Prison. As if that wasn’t bad enough if I were caught and Joined as my option, then when I was discharged I would be given an undesirable discharge after three years of service! Well I joined before your fucking little prick MP’s who had been taught to hunt us could catch me.
So fuck you assholes fuck you all to hell and beyond! I have to listen to the judgmental prattling of fucking punks who were not even born yet about how I am a criminal for going into military service. You know shit! You know jack dick shit you little dickless wonders. With your jaded ass ignorant little opinions about why men go to war as if you fucking knew what the holy Christ you were talking about. Smarmy little prigs with dicks no larger than twigs and zero balls to boot!
Fuck a bunch of May Ann Coulters Cook that seamy bitch cunt on a spit and serve her up to this wasted ass congress that put GEORGE W. BUSH in charge of anything but cleaning toilets. The whole lot of them should be dragged out of the fucking halls of Congress and impaled on the front lawn. You have no fucking idea how pissed I am at you stupid, thoughtless, empty, shallow, gutless little prune faced fucks
You keep telling me how I should be proud or killed for being a Veteran and I am going to take my weaseley faggot ass into Rambo Mode and kick the dog shit out of some fool before I eat his liver in front of his family. Now, is that what it is going to take or will you assholes use a little sensitivity with the Vets who REALLY THOUGHT they were trying to help. Remember, in the same position even YOUR ASS COULD BE BRAINWASHED!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: drone
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: politicky
» RE: MeyravLevine
Posted by: politicky
» Intellectual morons?
Posted by: TennMom
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Vets were trying to help?
Posted by: Nightstallion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gandolfshep on Jan 3, 2009 10:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have sat in a waiting chair at the VA for 6 hours past my appointment time to see a doctor. God forbid I had to go to their emergency room. Then you have a two to four hour wait for you meds to be filled.
Are their 200,000? I don't know but I believe that maybe a bit conseravitive. I have been homeless many times and had over 100 different low paying jobs through out the years since returning home to spit and verbal abuse.
I see a homeless Vet almost everyday and feel a deep guilt when they ask for spare change and I can only afford a meal for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia - we killed at 3 million innocent people
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia - we killed at 3 million innocent people
Posted by: gandolfshep
» MeyravLevine, are you too young or merely too stupid
Posted by: TennMom
» RE: MeyravLevine, are you too young or merely too stupid
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: MeyravLevine has a similar choice, action AND jail
Posted by: Beck
» Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia - we killed at 3 million innocent people
Posted by: johnorford
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billwald on Jan 3, 2009 11:19 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do not many of them also have mental problems? If a person has a head cold he takes head cold meds and stops when he if feeling better. Many people with mental problems stop taking their meds when they feel better. Then they have a set back. Crazy people don't take their meds because they are not rational.
Our legal system has concluded that one has a constitution right to be crazy unless one is also an immediate threat to life or property. A potential threat 5 years down the road doesn't matter. Can't lock up a person because in 5 years he might stop taking his meds.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eagan also closed 90% of "mental" hospital beds.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: eagan also closed 90% of "mental" hospital beds.
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jan 3, 2009 11:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We have a long history
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stopthemaddness2 on Jan 3, 2009 2:19 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 3, 2009 2:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marizara on Jan 3, 2009 3:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jan 3, 2009 6:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its up to US!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: MeyravLevine
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: wormfarmer
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: wormfarmer
» RE: Your nephew ought to know better than to serve in an illegal war
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jan 3, 2009 9:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always in all my years I have supported states rights over the Fed. Individual rights over State rule. The state cannot be right or wrong because a state is IMMORAL by its very nature. The blow that Individual rights suffered by Lincoln’s existence are immeasurable by any human standard.
I do not say that he needed assassination,but that he needed correction. Such correction that is improbable even today. We do not live in a civilization here we live in an Occupied Territory, A place where fewer than 23 % of the denizens have anything to say about governance let alone representation.
This is not a democracy, it never has been. It is a Religious Corporatocracy, which is a Chimera of Mammon and the worst brainwashing aspects of Christian Religion. On the surface of it this is not a good thing, and the infrastructure is based on demon worship on an unconscious level. ANY THING that is anti-life takes life without hope of replenishment. That used to be known as devil worship. The same things now are being called Justice in our American courts. Do you think that men could be suffering the death penalty on no solid evidence otherwise?
Do you truly believe some twit could be telling you are responsible for your own victimization otherwise? In a way she right you know, you are responsible for your victimization. After all you were the ones who manufactured your own leashes about what is loyalty and what isn’t!
Do you believe that you should continue to swallow these glib lies like some greased and nameless asshole? (Apologies Billy) Or do you think you should unleash the worst of us? The neural experiments, the mind control failures, the lobotomy cases the temporal lobe erasures, all the mad emotionless murderers used in Nam and Panama to rend tear and maim the civilians we were intended to preserve without your knowledge of us?
Welcome to the REAL black sleep you spineless whimpering simpering lemmings. Let us give you a taste of what our homeland gave us after the battle field; worse than betrayal, purposeful, painful, disrespectful, indifference! The ignominy of being ignored to death! Here we come sweeties you will know when we find you, and we will find you in broad daylight or in your beds at night.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Woah is this some harsh shit or what? Pinch me wake me up.
Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: Woah is this some harsh shit or what? Pinch me wake me up.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donl51 on Jan 3, 2009 11:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richard0a37 on Jan 4, 2009 1:20 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That means less than 10 homeless Vets per town, hardly earth shattering.
On the other hand,
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/ the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america.shtml tells us that:
Mental disorders are common in the United States and internationally. An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.
When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.
Even though mental disorders are widespread in the population, the main burden of illness is concentrated in a much smaller proportion — about 6 percent, or 1 in 17 — who suffer from a serious mental illness.
In addition, mental disorders are the leading cause of disability in the U.S. and Canada for ages 15-44.
Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time. Nearly half (45 percent) of those with any mental disorder meet criteria for 2 or more disorders, with severity strongly related to comorbidity.
It's all very well thrusting a large figure in front of your audience so they can throw their hands up in horror and disgust, but, taking the wider picture, you can see that, statistically, the number of homeless Vets is actually very small.
According to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16564208/
There were 744,000 homeless people in total in the United States in 2005, according to the first national estimate in a decade.
Besides, homelessness is the stuff of Hollywood movies. In the film 'Coming to America', Eddie Murphy pretends to be a crippled and homeless USA Vet. Every TV detective story is based on crime consequential to homelessness, poverty etc. In other words, it has become entertainment.
However, this article is written purely to cast further criticism on the Bush Administration, and not as a means to solving the problems of homelessness.
The image of the USA has been carefully constructed ever since someone looked through the lens of a movie camera and declared: 'we can really do something with this'. There must be hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of movies dedicated to presenting just the right image of USA since the beginning of the 20th century.
We just love the officer's uniform. It gives us a sense of pride, prestige, stability, power, confidence, virility, and at some stage in their careers, all movie stars play high ranking officers. Even Tom Cruise in 'Lions for Lambs' has his picture taken standing next to George W Bush and Condeleezza Rice, which also stars Robert Redford and Meryl Streep.
Hollywood films like to merge fantasy with reality, while the media endeavour to create pictures in our minds that suggest the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richard0a37 on Jan 4, 2009 1:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does no one ever think about anything else? Occasionally, I see a member of the armed services walking down the street in UK, but to me, he lives on a different planet, for I cannot imagine what has possessed him to join an institution whose prime purpose is to kill strangers.
It's almost as if the military has become a way of life with the US population in general. Here in UK, the Queen is the head of the armed services, and the public persona between her and the military is very Alice in Wonderland like. Here in UK, the military presence is very low key.
So it could be that the sabre rattling that the USA is forever engaged in across the planet is what has led to a surge in military activity by all other nations. If the US Military left all the nations it currently occupies, the odds are this would lead to a much healthier situation world wide.
It's the US Military who occupy other nations, not the other way round. If a criminal entered your house, you would not be able to rest. This is why everything that Bush says is a big fat lie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Obsessed with the military
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Adnihilo on Jan 4, 2009 9:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Volunteering to kill for a US Gov't regime's political agenda surely doesn't make an American 'patriotic'. If anything, it just means they're stupid or ignorant of reality. There is not a soldier alive or dead who ever fought for the freedom of any American born after WW 2. Except perhaps the Cuban Missile Crisis...
Patriotism doesn't come from picking up a gun to kill Government-designated 'enemies of the state'. If alleged 'patriotic' Americans stopped volunteering to kill for a gov't imperialistic political agenda the gov't would again be forcing Americans to kill for them... And that only leads to political and economic revolution - something this country desperately needs.. This would seem to indicate soldiers who volunteered to kill for our Gov't's political agendas were something other than 'patriotic' Americans...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jan 4, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jan 4, 2009 11:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank You all, but the horse is out of the barn. What if they held a war, and nobody came?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: In response to
Posted by: gandolfshep
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Jan 4, 2009 2:59 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NAM67VET on Jan 4, 2009 4:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the vets, whether Nam vets like me, doing flashbacks to how we coped with war and the "homecoming" we didn't get, or our young sisters and brothers coming back (and going again and again and again)to the same bullshit treatment by the same bullshit government, I say "Welcome Home!"
To the vets and to those who stand with us, I say, "Join VVAW or IVAW, and stand with veterans against the bullshit wars and for the wounded warriors."
To the mewling pukes who want to feel big by crapping on those who went to fight and left a piece of their souls overseas in a pool of horror and gore, I say what we said to the VFW and American Legion and the other right-wingers who didn't want us around: fuck you. We will take care of ourselves and one another, and you may picture yourselves as on the receiving end of a size 11 jungle combat boot being thrown at your head.
There. That's enough to make the old man feel better.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: parting words
Posted by: gandolfshep
Comments are closed-
Posted by: namguardianangel on Jan 4, 2009 6:53 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This came from the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans
How many homeless veterans are there?
Although accurate numbers are impossible to come by -- no one keeps national records on homeless veterans -- the VA estimates that nearly 200,000 veterans are homeless on any given night. And nearly 400,000 experience homelessness over the course of a year. Conservatively, one out of every three homeless men who is sleeping in a doorway, alley or box in our cities and rural communities has put on a uniform and served this country. According to the National Survey of Homeless Assistance Providers and Clients (U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness and the Urban Institute, 1999), veterans account for 23% of all homeless people in America.
http://www.nchv.org/background.cfm
While homeless veterans are a huge problem, what also needs to be part of the discussion is incarcerated veterans along with the devastating affects on the children of PTSD veterans when they don't know what it is. I really appreciate it when people shine the light on PTSD because the more they read about it, the greater the chance we can finally get some of this right. Two thirds of the population of America don't know what it is but over 7 million have it. The problem is, too many have it but don't know what it is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 876 on Jan 5, 2009 6:57 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good maybe these idiot patriots who are so happy to murder and tyrannize impoverished people will learn something and serve as a lesson to anyone who would follow in their foot steps. My sympathy lies with the devastated people of Iraq and Afghanistan not a bunch of entitled Americans. When was the last time Americans had any remorse for the misery they create for millions of people?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who cares?
Posted by: gandolfshep
» RE: Who cares?
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 5, 2009 1:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you died 'over there' they raise a plaque to you and name bridges after you and schools. If you survive combat and abuse by other service personell,they shit all over you. Why?
Because the bastards make lots of money off of making our men and women into cold blooded killers for the President. Remember CONGRESS DID NOT DECLARE THIS WAR!!!!!! Bush did,as a family vendetta. If you don't know that you've been in a coma for the last twenty years.
Until this farce of a governance ever decides to start making policies that make vets and troops obsolete then this government isn't worth the time it takes to wipe your ass. That's what they're doing to us vets and
until we stop their idiocy...it's not going to stop.
If you think Obama's any better,you'd better go check yourself. So far all he is is talk.
Talking the Talk and Walking the walk,the same old shit falling out a brand new asshole.
I know that opinion won't sit too well with some folks,but, until he gives a 'serious econ-stimulus', to the working poor and starts talking about creating Peace without resulting to bloodshed. He's just another DC dope.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jcore77 on Jan 5, 2009 1:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David H Brooks has started this non profit foundation for all of those heroic Americans who have served and sacrificed in the name of freedom overseas and protection here at home.
David H Brooks foundation is a non profit organization that is geared towards helping American Soldiers and the extra help they need when they come back home.
- Health Care
- Medication
- Counseling
- Physical Therapy
- Housing Assistance
- Aiding the families of disabled survivors
and so much more...
All of this is made possible by the private funding of founder David H. Brooks, the Foundation for America's Wounded Heroes continues to touch hearts and lives every day.
David H. Brooks Founder DHB Industries has managed to save thousands of lives over the years of developing body armor technology and has developed an ongoing lifesaving legacy.
Over the years David H. Brooks has managed to develop cutting edge body armor technology and innovative solutions for the military and law enforcement professionals alike.
David H. Brooks is also involved in a humanitarian mission in Malawi in Africa offering generous donations to help aid the grief stricken areas, he also donates generously to multiple charities, and has managed to save a non profit organization “Ogen Shabbos” which helps thousands of homeless and needy people daily.
Recognition
David H. Brooks
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bob12386 on Jan 5, 2009 11:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Life in America is hard and when times get tough, sinking to the bottom is a rather simple matter without a support structure to prop you up.
Lose a job and run out of money and you're on the street. Once you're on the street, you say on the street.
Pretty simple really. Social darwinism at work.
Personally, I'm an unemployed vet and if I run out of money before I get a new job, I die. It's that simple.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jan 16, 2009 9:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A hugely disproportionate number of homeless veterans had suffered a brain injury during their service.
Homeless veterans frequently deal with many other illnesses and disorders such as eye problems, hypertension, cardiovascular problems, COPD/emphysema, tuberculosis, gastrointestinal problems, hepatic disease, neurologic disorders, orthopedic problems, skin problems, and trauma.
There is a huge population of veterans from our current war(s) who are coming back comorbid for PTSD and a head injury, and it's really important that we keep up pressure to give these guys the support they need and deserve.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
MoveOn Launches Campaign for Bold Progressive Reforms as the Obama Era Begins
Obama's Promise of Change Comes Wrapped in Red, White and Blue
Reactions to Obama's Historic Moment From Around the Globe

'Christian' Manifesto Comparing Liberals to Nazis Gathers Signatures of Religious Right Leaders -- and Catholic Bishops




