ELECTION 2008  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 18

War, Environmental Destruction, Recession: It's Time for a Revolution

You know you are in a perilous time when the optimist and pessimist agree.
December 10, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2008 headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

War, starvation, disease, inflation, environmental spoliation and severe recession domestically and around the world possibly leading to a full-blown depression: these problems can only be ameliorated and resolved with popular citizen involvement and new citizen movements. Franklin D. Roosevelt understood that in a democracy a publicly elected servant was not a commander but a catalyst who moves people into action by giving them the public space to take action within new and democratically agreed upon frameworks. But FDR also urged us never to forget that "the ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a president and senators and congressmen and government officials, but the voters of this country."

Some 133 million people voted in 2008 elections, a record. But if all citizens do is simply vote and walk away until the next election cycle, little will be accomplished, and the nation will continue to travel down the slippery slope of disaster. We must realize that like a person, a nation needs head, heart, hand and soul not just to survive but to endure.

The surprising excitement around the elections suggests that people were "sick and tired and not going to take it anymore." With the rise of Barack Obama, there was a quality of democratic hope in which Americans announced that they were no longer passive. It seemed that they were saying that their intention was not only to judge the government, but also to participate in it.

If Obama was the first presidential candidate to truly harness the power of the Internet to win office, a new generation of Americans should be able to use the Internet 24/7 as watchdogs, not only to guard against future incursions on their freedoms by the Executive Branch and Congress, but to rollback unjust and illegal laws that have steadily chipped away at our freedoms -- and in the case of Bush II, stolen some of them outright. Obama announced that he wants his presidency to be transparent. Using the Internet in all of its permutations can be an instantaneous way of holding his feet to the democratic fire.

After the Glass Shatters

Given the anxious state of the union, this is no time to settle for mere fragments of the shattered glass. We face, as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. put it, "the fierce urgency of now," by which he and we mean the unresolved American democratic problems of permanent war, economic hardship and unfairness, the fragility of the environment, class disparity, gender equality and identity, and, yes, race.

Which poses questions unique in American history: Will our first African American president, who did not run on the issue of race, initiate a national discussion to heal our racial wounds? Will the image and actions of this intelligent, charismatic leader continue to lift up African Americans and bridge the 400-year divide with white Americans when his election euphoria wears off from media overexposure and impatience with not quickly "fixing" the economy and ending the wars? Will Obama prove in his actions and words that the U.S. is in fact a human blending -- that we are all one people? Or will a black man in the White House bring old wounds to a new and even uglier surface than the covert racism of the 2008 campaigns of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (with an assist by her husband) and Sen. John McCain's running mate, Alaska Gove. Sarah Palin, who seemed to feed off slurs and threats against Obama and blacks from her white audiences?

The authors, "children of the Depression, war, the Cold War, surveillance and McCarthyism" no less worried about the future than our fellow citizens, choose to raise a brand new glass, brimming with fresh ideas, even ones mistakenly discarded, and new infusions of energy and hope for a changing and beleaguered world, and we offer a toast to this and future generations.

Adapted from the afterword of the new paperback edition (Potomac Books) of The Four Freedoms Under Siege: The Clear and Present Danger of Our National Security State by Marcus Raskin and Robert Spero.


Marcus Raskin is the distinguished fellow and co-founder of the Institute for Policy Studies, the first think tank of its kind. He is also professor of policy studies at George Washington University, a member of the editorial board of the Nation, and author or editor of 20 books, including In Democracy's Shadow (2005), edited with Carl Le Van, and Liberalism (2004).

Robert Spero, author of The Duping of the American Voter: Dishonesty & Deception in Presidential Television Advertising, served with the Agency for International Development during the Kennedy administration and the presidentÂ’s domestic Peace Corps group. He is a journalist (Present Tense, the Progressive), consultant to international service organizations, and former advertising executive (Ogilvy & Mather).

Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2008 headlines via email


Comments are closed-

They seem to have something going on in Greece...
Posted by: nihilozero on Dec 10, 2008 1:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fear that revolution in the U$A is less likely though because of the surveillance/police state apparatus in place. On top of that, the propaganda machine has people so dumbed down that most have no idea what really needs to be changed -- and fundamental change is certainly need. My question is this, how bad does it have to get?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Only Effective Revolution Is
Posted by: Last Chance on Dec 10, 2008 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A peaceful change for green technology to replace industrial sprawl and peaceful family planning to reduce the human population. Then, the people will be free to organize their own villages and to freely trade with each other for mutual benefit -- and there would be no need for big corporations or big government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A peaceful revolution can happen Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Ah, yes: Posted by: oregoncharles
» Today is a good day to begin Posted by: Last Chance

Comments are closed-

What is a revolution today?
Posted by: Coleman on Dec 10, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The optimists and the pessimists agree on what's important, but there is little consensus on the Left about the old, important question, "What is to be done?" French philosopher Alain Badiou, who thinks about these things, reflects on this and the conservative electoral victories in French politics in an article published earlier this year, available here:

Alain Badiou, "The Communist Hypothesis"

As for the above article, I think the most important point to draw is that our cherished right to vote is really a very superficial expression of political will. But recall how much time, energy, and money the two big parties dumped into the process for the past year? And not just the parties, but our other institutions as well. Years of planning all boil down to one moment - the vote - and then the People's hands are officially off the levers of power until the next election. How can we change this? What would an ongoing popular intervention in government affairs look like? Could we use the internet? In a transition to a more democratic political system, would it be necessary to dump the higher ups in the government, or could they stay with a less authoritarian role? Practical and theoretical questions abound.

As for the "revolution vs. reform" question that distracts many young people on the Left, I think the question is outmoded. It's like asking should I take the stage coach or the steam locomotive to Austin, TX? It's a question whose object is fading into the past quickly. Now is a time for the Left to come together on issues of principle to guide issues of practice. Where are our popular institutions today? More importantly, where should be look to build them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: 1776 was an anomaly
Posted by: EinMD on Dec 10, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which will quickly result in a government official being there with a gun to your head.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Constitution Be Our Guide Posted by: Last Chance

Comments are closed-

RE: 1776 was an anomaly
Posted by: EinMD on Dec 10, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the answer isn't to ignore the government. The answer is to take LOTS AND LOTS of interest in the government. Politicians don't like it when the plebs pay attention. They tend to lose their cushy seats that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: "To live outside the law, you must be honest."
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And how many of us have the nerve?

That's true about revolutions, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Where the "power" should be...
Posted by: Feltixx on Dec 10, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revolutions don't have to be bloody to make changes. The U.S. was built on the idea of the people having the power to steer or change this country as we all see fit. That idea has since been trashed. The only recent example of it I've seen was during the rising and falling of the gas prices. Prices went up because of "Chinese consumption"... "supply worries"... "world tensions" and lots of other excuses. But notice that when the PEOPLE of this country said they've had enough and started changing their habits, the demand and price started dropping like a rock! Did the Chinese cut their comsumption greatly?? Have Middle east tensions waned and everything is hunky-dorey in the M.E. now?? No, the people made this change. They have more clout than they know and should wake up. I'm not a big poster on Alternet or anywhere else for that matter but sometimes I have to call 'em as I see 'em.

O.K..... let the vultures pick me over now... I'm done. :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Check back, Feltixx... Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Check back, Feltixx... Posted by: Feltixx

Comments are closed-

"Revolution?"
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish this piece rose to the level promised by the title. Maybe the book does, but I doubt it.

I'm extremely nervous about any references to "revolution," both because of its inherent destructiveness and because the right wing seems to have all the guns. I'm personally committed to electoral action, but I suspect, with these authors, that something more is needed. So does someone at Alternet: they bring up the subject on a regular basis. That person probably wrote the title, which is a big stretch from the article.

So what is the political equivalent of revolution? Well, elections are, once in a while, when they step outside the box. This one wasn't: we wound up right back inside the same old 2-party, "centrist" box that led us to our present plight. Granted that Obama appears to be an improvement on Bush II, that isn't asking much. His record, his campaign pledges, and his appointments all say that he's a DLC Democrat, practically a clone of Bill Clinton. And the Clinton administration laid a lot of the groundwork for our present disaster, from torturing Iraq to deregulating the financial system. Now they're coming back to haunt us.

Is it possible President Obama will rise to the occasion, despite his record? Of course: FDR did, but that's the only example in recent history. Saying that he WILL, despite all indications, is pure wishful thinking. I see a lot of that in the comments here, and hints of it in the article.

The real equivalent of revolution is a Constitutional Convention, which we've never had another of. Certainly the one we have is a clunky mess, in serious need of repair. Unfortunately, it's a Pandora's Box: maybe there's Hope in the bottom, but you have to wade through a lot of bad stuff to get there. I'm afraid the Bill of Rights would go away - polls show little popular support for it.

That leaves us with a "popular movement." We don't have that, and it's not clear where it would come from. We don't have much of a peace movement because it is co-opted and sabotaged by a Democratic campaign every 4 years. I no longer think that's a coincidence. There are some smart people running the Democratic Party, and they don't want to give up on the Empire. Obama was not a Peace candidate any more than Kerry; expect 8 more years of imperial war, the same we got from Nixon.

And the anti-globalization/economic justice movement was destroyed by 9/11. As far as I can tell, the Green Party is all that's left of it. (Brief plug: we need help. If you want to have a real progressive alternative in politics, check out www.gp.org and join.)

Unfortunately, we aren't Greek. Apparently Greece has retained a culture of resistance; ours is now 40 years old, and the people in it are much older. They're getting tired, and not so eager to get their heads bashed. And arguably, we already have a police state: American police do not have the self-restraint of the Greeks. They would have shot hundreds of people by now.

So where is this "social movement" they're talking about? There are lots of little ones, but no big one. It was co-opted by the Democratic campaign, and produced a new Clinton administration. Clinton was lucky: he presided over 8 years of "prosperity" (meaning the previous bubbles.) We aren't going to be so lucky this time.

I guess this piece didn't make me any less pessimistic. Any suggestions out there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Afterthought:
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the Hell is this under "Foreign Policy?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Here's an idea:
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" Poor/middle class can collapse an empire simply not paying their loans
Posted by: helllfire on Dec 10, 2008 6:22 AM


These fools have really taken humanity way out on the end of the limb this time. For the first time in all of recorded history, the downtrodden, who have been allowed to overloaded themselves with debt, can bring down wall street, the military industrial complex and foreign banks simply by refusing to pay their credit card/student loans/car loans...this is our big shot....we have a moral obligation not to repay any of our credit debt...we must collapse the system...I cant wait to see these upper class kids working n the fields along with the rest of us. Collapse the system...you owe it to your kids!!!!"

Not mine, but worth thinking about. It's on the Chris Hedges article.

Of course, this is exactly what's happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

They seem to have something going on in Greece...
Posted by: nihilozero on Dec 10, 2008 1:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fear that revolution in the U$A is less likely though because of the surveillance/police state apparatus in place. On top of that, the propaganda machine has people so dumbed down that most have no idea what really needs to be changed -- and fundamental change is certainly need. My question is this, how bad does it have to get?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Only Effective Revolution Is
Posted by: Last Chance on Dec 10, 2008 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A peaceful change for green technology to replace industrial sprawl and peaceful family planning to reduce the human population. Then, the people will be free to organize their own villages and to freely trade with each other for mutual benefit -- and there would be no need for big corporations or big government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A peaceful revolution can happen Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Ah, yes: Posted by: oregoncharles
» Today is a good day to begin Posted by: Last Chance

Comments are closed-

What is a revolution today?
Posted by: Coleman on Dec 10, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The optimists and the pessimists agree on what's important, but there is little consensus on the Left about the old, important question, "What is to be done?" French philosopher Alain Badiou, who thinks about these things, reflects on this and the conservative electoral victories in French politics in an article published earlier this year, available here:

Alain Badiou, "The Communist Hypothesis"

As for the above article, I think the most important point to draw is that our cherished right to vote is really a very superficial expression of political will. But recall how much time, energy, and money the two big parties dumped into the process for the past year? And not just the parties, but our other institutions as well. Years of planning all boil down to one moment - the vote - and then the People's hands are officially off the levers of power until the next election. How can we change this? What would an ongoing popular intervention in government affairs look like? Could we use the internet? In a transition to a more democratic political system, would it be necessary to dump the higher ups in the government, or could they stay with a less authoritarian role? Practical and theoretical questions abound.

As for the "revolution vs. reform" question that distracts many young people on the Left, I think the question is outmoded. It's like asking should I take the stage coach or the steam locomotive to Austin, TX? It's a question whose object is fading into the past quickly. Now is a time for the Left to come together on issues of principle to guide issues of practice. Where are our popular institutions today? More importantly, where should be look to build them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: 1776 was an anomaly
Posted by: EinMD on Dec 10, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which will quickly result in a government official being there with a gun to your head.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Constitution Be Our Guide Posted by: Last Chance

Comments are closed-

RE: 1776 was an anomaly
Posted by: EinMD on Dec 10, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the answer isn't to ignore the government. The answer is to take LOTS AND LOTS of interest in the government. Politicians don't like it when the plebs pay attention. They tend to lose their cushy seats that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: "To live outside the law, you must be honest."
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And how many of us have the nerve?

That's true about revolutions, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Where the "power" should be...
Posted by: Feltixx on Dec 10, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revolutions don't have to be bloody to make changes. The U.S. was built on the idea of the people having the power to steer or change this country as we all see fit. That idea has since been trashed. The only recent example of it I've seen was during the rising and falling of the gas prices. Prices went up because of "Chinese consumption"... "supply worries"... "world tensions" and lots of other excuses. But notice that when the PEOPLE of this country said they've had enough and started changing their habits, the demand and price started dropping like a rock! Did the Chinese cut their comsumption greatly?? Have Middle east tensions waned and everything is hunky-dorey in the M.E. now?? No, the people made this change. They have more clout than they know and should wake up. I'm not a big poster on Alternet or anywhere else for that matter but sometimes I have to call 'em as I see 'em.

O.K..... let the vultures pick me over now... I'm done. :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Check back, Feltixx... Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Check back, Feltixx... Posted by: Feltixx

Comments are closed-

"Revolution?"
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish this piece rose to the level promised by the title. Maybe the book does, but I doubt it.

I'm extremely nervous about any references to "revolution," both because of its inherent destructiveness and because the right wing seems to have all the guns. I'm personally committed to electoral action, but I suspect, with these authors, that something more is needed. So does someone at Alternet: they bring up the subject on a regular basis. That person probably wrote the title, which is a big stretch from the article.

So what is the political equivalent of revolution? Well, elections are, once in a while, when they step outside the box. This one wasn't: we wound up right back inside the same old 2-party, "centrist" box that led us to our present plight. Granted that Obama appears to be an improvement on Bush II, that isn't asking much. His record, his campaign pledges, and his appointments all say that he's a DLC Democrat, practically a clone of Bill Clinton. And the Clinton administration laid a lot of the groundwork for our present disaster, from torturing Iraq to deregulating the financial system. Now they're coming back to haunt us.

Is it possible President Obama will rise to the occasion, despite his record? Of course: FDR did, but that's the only example in recent history. Saying that he WILL, despite all indications, is pure wishful thinking. I see a lot of that in the comments here, and hints of it in the article.

The real equivalent of revolution is a Constitutional Convention, which we've never had another of. Certainly the one we have is a clunky mess, in serious need of repair. Unfortunately, it's a Pandora's Box: maybe there's Hope in the bottom, but you have to wade through a lot of bad stuff to get there. I'm afraid the Bill of Rights would go away - polls show little popular support for it.

That leaves us with a "popular movement." We don't have that, and it's not clear where it would come from. We don't have much of a peace movement because it is co-opted and sabotaged by a Democratic campaign every 4 years. I no longer think that's a coincidence. There are some smart people running the Democratic Party, and they don't want to give up on the Empire. Obama was not a Peace candidate any more than Kerry; expect 8 more years of imperial war, the same we got from Nixon.

And the anti-globalization/economic justice movement was destroyed by 9/11. As far as I can tell, the Green Party is all that's left of it. (Brief plug: we need help. If you want to have a real progressive alternative in politics, check out www.gp.org and join.)

Unfortunately, we aren't Greek. Apparently Greece has retained a culture of resistance; ours is now 40 years old, and the people in it are much older. They're getting tired, and not so eager to get their heads bashed. And arguably, we already have a police state: American police do not have the self-restraint of the Greeks. They would have shot hundreds of people by now.

So where is this "social movement" they're talking about? There are lots of little ones, but no big one. It was co-opted by the Democratic campaign, and produced a new Clinton administration. Clinton was lucky: he presided over 8 years of "prosperity" (meaning the previous bubbles.) We aren't going to be so lucky this time.

I guess this piece didn't make me any less pessimistic. Any suggestions out there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Afterthought:
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the Hell is this under "Foreign Policy?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Here's an idea:
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" Poor/middle class can collapse an empire simply not paying their loans
Posted by: helllfire on Dec 10, 2008 6:22 AM


These fools have really taken humanity way out on the end of the limb this time. For the first time in all of recorded history, the downtrodden, who have been allowed to overloaded themselves with debt, can bring down wall street, the military industrial complex and foreign banks simply by refusing to pay their credit card/student loans/car loans...this is our big shot....we have a moral obligation not to repay any of our credit debt...we must collapse the system...I cant wait to see these upper class kids working n the fields along with the rest of us. Collapse the system...you owe it to your kids!!!!"

Not mine, but worth thinking about. It's on the Chris Hedges article.

Of course, this is exactly what's happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS