Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

2008 Results: Fewer White Voters, While Minorities Set Records

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted November 18, 2008.


A preliminary study of 2008 results finds more than a million fewer white voters than in 2004 and nearly 7 million new minority voters.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

America's electorate may have changed in striking and subtle ways in 2008 compared to 2004, according to a preliminary study by a national voter registration group that found sizeable numbers of white voters did not vote in battleground states this November while record numbers of minorities turned out and voted.

"The overall message is total ballots cast by white Americans was down, while African Americans and Latinos cast way more ballots than they did in 2004," said Jody Herman, a researcher with Project Vote. "And young voters, age 18-29, cast over 1.8 million more ballots than in 2005, which is a 9 percent increase. That increase was greater than any other age group."

Nationally, 3.35 million more people voted for president in 2008 than four years ago, according to unofficial state results compiled by Project Vote. That slight increase in voters, and lower-than-expected turnout in swing states like Ohio, has left election administrators and academics pondering what happened in a year where the public appeared to be very engaged. Most academics stressed it was too early to draw any conclusion about a changing electorate, because states are not done counting votes.

"They're still counting the ballots in California. They're still counting the ballots in Missouri. They're still counting the ballots in Ohio," said Larry Sabato, of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics. But Sabato, who said he spent Monday on a plane reviewing 2008 exit polls, said the election's broad outlines were clear.

"I think absolutely white Republicans did not show up," he said. "They were turned off, disillusioned. They did not turn out. Democratic voters did come out. They couldn't wait to vote."

"It's the same electorate but with different turnout rates with one exception; presumably the Latino electorate is actually growing as more and more Latinos becomes citizens," said Alexander Keyssar, a Professor of History and Social Policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.

Still, the preliminary research by Project Vote, which organized registration drives in two dozen states in 2008, was striking. It found 1.18 million fewer whites voted on November 4 compared to November 2004.

In contrast, 2.88 million more African Americans, 1.52 million more Latinos, 67,000 more Asian Americans and 1.32 million members of other minorities, voted this fall compared to four years ago. That is 1.18 million fewer white voters and 6.96 million more minority voters.

Project Vote said its findings would be adjusted as more data is available. However, a report issued by the group last year, "Representational Bias in the 2006 Electorate," concluded, "If all eligible minorities had voted at the rate of non-Hispanic whites, more than 7.5 million additional people would have participated in the 2006 elections."

Thus, the appearance of an African-American presidential candidate with a sympathetic message may have prompted the nation's minorities to vote at levels approaching white voters -- if final state vote counts do not upend Project Vote's figures. Its findings also suggest the U.S. electorate is not an inflexible assembly of voting constituencies, but has segments that are mobilized -- or demobilized -- depending on the year, candidate and message.

"I wouldn't look at the overall turnout numbers," said one registration expert who reviewed Project Vote's numbers but did not want to be quoted. "The story becomes interesting when you look at the specifics of who tuned out and who didn't."

Battleground States

Project Vote looked at ballot-casting statistics in seven battleground states. In four of those states -- Ohio, Missouri, Colorado and New Mexico -- there were fewer white voters this year compared to 2004. All those states and Pennsylvania, Florida and Nevada, also saw an increase in Latino voters in 2008. And all the states, except for New Mexico, saw an increase in African-American voters compared to 2004.

The state with the biggest drop in white voters was Ohio, which saw 537,832 or 11 percent fewer white voters casting ballots this year, according to Project Vote. Ohio saw 65,922 additional African American voters, a 13 percent increase; it had 39,578 more Latino voters, a 23 percent increase. Overall, Ohio had 441,000 fewer voters in 2008 compared to 2004.

"Everyone has been struggling to figure out why there are fewer voters," said Bryan Clark, a spokesman in Ohio's secretary of state's office. "I think there was a suppressed white turnout in blue-collar areas. The Reagan Democrats stayed home and the social conservatives weren't excited by the McCain-Palin ticket."

But Clark took issue with some of Project Vote's numbers. First, Ohio was still verifying 200,000 provisional ballots, he said, which would cut into the group's overall state findings. Using 2004 exit poll data as a baseline for comparison with 2008 was also problematic, he said, because the 2004 Ohio exit poll had many flaws.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, minority voters, project vote, minority turnout, white turnout, 2008 battleground states

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and author of Count My Vote: A Citizen's Guide to Voting (AlterNet Books, 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
McAmnesty offended his base
Posted by: kahuna_2bears on Nov 18, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is wrong.

The problem is that McCain (I call him McAmnesty) offended the conservative base. They voted in other races like Prop 8, I1000 and other races. We just refused to hold our nose and vote for the lesser of two evils for the fourth straight time. Starting in 1996 when Bob Dole was running against Bill Clinton.

I have voted for a third party candidate for the last four presidential elections.

I wrote in my blog that I would vote for McAmnesty when hell froze over. Many other conservatives also called into talk shows such as Jerry Doyle, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Medved, G. Gordon Liddy and others and told the conservative leadership that we could in no way vote for Mc Amnesty.

It is long past time that the republican leadership wake up and put forward some names of real conservatives, or the Republicans are going to go the way of the Whig party

I for one am sick and tired of having to vote for the lesser of two evils, and candidates who run to the right to get the conservative base, then once into office they are into office they spend money like a liberal.

What America needs is statesmen. We have more politicians than we know what to do with already.

I had hoped the Republican party had learned their lesson after 2006. If they do not forward some decent conservatives in 2010; I am going to change my registration from republican to independent as Jerry Doyle did almost four years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McAmnesty offended his base Posted by: 2thepoint
I met a lot of "Reagan Democrats" who were tired of being sold out on the economy and the wars.
Posted by: jwverez on Nov 18, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, my state of TX went to Mccain but not by the wide margin it went to Bush. The thing is some of these people are waking up to the fact that maybe the Republicans aren't what they claim to be. Family values? It ain't in their policies and it certainly doesn't show in the pols themselves. Democrats may have issues but at least they're not the shitpot hypocrites Republicans make themselves to be. Tired of "free" trade, tax breaks and loopholes for the wealthy and huge corporations, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with the possibility of Iran, Syria, and Pakistan, etc ... ? Forget the Republicans. I say it's time to pressure the Dems now that they have the power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I take exception to the hyphen
Posted by: popsicle67 on Nov 18, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It says in the article that President Elect Obama
is the first "African-American" President. Look at that for a moment. Knowing that every American descends from immigrants, even Native-Americans, why do we saddle people with the hyphen. I voted for him but not because of the hyphen, I voted for him because his foibles did not include a need to make you adhere to his invisible friends rules for life or an overwhelming itch to see how much of the Constitution could be shredded and not incur armed revolution. I can honestly say I didn't care if the president elect was even a citizen
let alone a different color than past presidents, I just wanted someone who was smarter than me and someone who would actually
be in charge. The Bush administration had to many shadow warriors and not enough accountability. I am sure many voter would echo my feelings. We should find a new way to name people who are descended from immigrants though.I suggest we use the word American, I know it's corny but I'm proud to be American again and we are stealing that from these people with that hyphen, so lose the damn hyphen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm.... maybe I just need more coffee
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 18, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Usually I get a lot out of pieces by Steven and this one is interesting because I didn't get what the point was. It's all over the place and presented a bunch of info but lacked the focus the title promised.

The one thing I got out of the election results was the response from my melanin-rich friends saying, to a person, expressed separately, that Obama showed them they can try stuff in their own lives, that trying is worth doing again. The importance of that to a disenfranchised group cannot be overstated. To me, that's a meaningful result, even if I'm freaking out that the System was upheld regardless of what we actually need.

The other thing I got out of this was my daughter's and others' daughters' responses to Cynthia McKinney's candidacy and Obama's over-shadowance of her and the Greens' POV: "why should I vote for a black man when I can vote for a black woman?!" One friend of my daughter said over post-futbol pizza the other night, "the fact that the Green Party and Cynthia, a black woman, were invisible to the System and a black man, tells us girls that you grownups have a lot more work to do in bringing equality and partnering to politics and democracy." Another girl chimed in, "Yeah, you guys are leaving us a gigantic mess to clean up." Still another said, "Obama's win means America saved face but nothing is going to get better, because it's still man-controlled and rich people-controlled." "What's up with the voting system, we can choose cheese or pepperoni meanwhile there's a bazillion other toppings out there. Come on!"

From the mouths of eleven and twelve year olds...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement