Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Sayonara, Sarah Palin

By Katha Pollitt, The Nation. Posted November 10, 2008.


God's gift to journalism -- and to feminism.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

And so we bid farewell to Sarah Palin. How I'll miss her daily presence in my life! The mooseburgers, the wolf hunts, the kids named after bays and sports and trees and airplanes and who did not seem to go to school at all, the winks and blinks, the cute Alaska accent, the witch-hunting pastor and those great little flared jackets, especially the gray stripey one. People say she was a dingbat, but that is just sexist: the woman read everything, she said so herself; her knowledge of geography was unreal -- she knew just where to find the pro-America part of the country; and don't forget her keen interest in ancient history! Thanks largely to her, Bill Ayers is now the most famous sixtysomething professor in the country -- eat your heart out, Ward Churchill! You can snipe all you want, but she was truly God's gift: to Barack Obama, Katie Couric -- notice no one's making fun of America's sweetheart now -- Tina Fey and columnists all over America.

She was also a gift to feminism. Seriously. I don't mean she was a feminist -- she told Couric she considered herself one, but in a later interview, perhaps after looking up the meaning of the word, coyly wondered why she needed to "label" herself. And I don't mean she had a claim on the votes of feminists or women -- why should women who care about equality vote for a woman who wants to take their rights away? Elaine Lafferty, a former editor of Ms., made a splash by revealing in The Daily Beast (Tina Brown's new website, for those of you still following the news on paper) that she has been working as a consultant to Palin. In a short but painful piece of public relations called "Sarah Palin's a Brainiac," Lafferty claimed to find in Palin "a mind that is thoughtful, curious, with a discernible pattern of associative thinking and insight," with a "photographic memory," as smart as legendary Senator Sam Ervin, "a woman who knows exactly who she is." According to Lafferty, all that stuff about library censorship and rape kits was just "nonsense" -- and feminists who held Palin's wish to criminalize abortion against her were Beltway feminist-establishment elitists who shop at Whole Foods when they should be voting against Barack Obama to make the Dems stop taking women for granted.

So the first way Palin was good for feminism is that she helped us clarify what it isn't: feminism doesn't mean voting for "the woman" just because she's female, and it doesn't mean confusing self-injury with empowerment, like the Ellen Jamesians in The World According to Garp (I'll vote for the forced-childbirth candidate, that'll show Howard Dean!). It isn't just feel-good "you go, girl" appreciation of female moxie, which I cheerfully acknowledge Palin has by the gallon. As I wrote when she was selected, if she were my neighbor I would probably like her -- at least until she organized with her fellow Christians to ban abortion at the local hospital, as Palin did in the 1990s. Yes, feminism is about women getting their fair share of power, and that includes the top jobs -- but that can't take a back seat to policies that benefit all women: equality on the job and the legal framework that undergirds it, antiviolence, reproductive self-determination, healthcare, education, childcare and so on. Fortunately, women who care about equality get this -- dead-enders like the comically clueless Lynn Forester de Rothschild got lots of press, but in the end Obama won the support of the vast majority of women who had supported Hillary Clinton.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, sarah palin

Katha Pollitt is a columnist for The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
again, Sarah's a pair of flipflops
Posted by: weathered on Nov 10, 2008 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
at a blacktie.

Its not that she couldn't be an effective public servant in some good capacity, its that she's chosen not to be.

So out classed and so way over her head, I applaud all the Women who saw right through packaging and called out the product for what it is;bargain basement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: again, Sarah's a pair of flipflops Posted by: Patriot of the USA
» I see how it is Posted by: IPF
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Don't count your chickens before they're hatched...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 10, 2008 3:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even though I would like nothing better than to have her go back to Alaska and hibernate... Forever... "Poison Palin" is still getting a LOT of press and as long as she's still in the media SHE AIN'T GONE...

So, as much as we all want to sing in unison, "Ding Dong the Witch is Dead..." until she's completely gone from the news media she's still a threat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow - she's scary isn't she? Posted by: gigantor21
» RE: Wow - Ignorance is Scary. Posted by: munchkinpup
Evil doings still lurking in Alaska
Posted by: watergrl69 on Nov 10, 2008 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin will lose no time in spreading the mantra of a natural gas pipeline for America across Alaska. Never mind that the energy and cost to build it will far exceed any benefit to America. Also look to her to push for opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil development.

Hopefully now that the America is watching, Alaska's rednecks will no longer be allowed to slaughter wolf and bear cubs, rape the land for mineral and development, and fill the till with federal pork while they get $3200 checks just for living in Alaska. If Ted Stevens if finally ousted, at least the rest of the Senate won't have to endure his threats and 'punishment' for not supporting his "roads to nowhere."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X pat observer
Posted by: davy on Nov 10, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just for the record I haven't read this post. Don't let the door hit you on the arse. Now, once again, finally, there is only one Palin, Michael. If only "the Pythons" were still on the loose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Michael Palin Posted by: kepstein7777
Got us Obama
Posted by: craighorowitz on Nov 10, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If McCain had picked an actual Republican female contender, the election might have been much closer or even lost. Except to that column of never-vote-for-democrat-if-my-life-depended-on-it bunch, Palin was AN EXTRAORDINARY moron. If this was 2000, and McCain was 8 years younger (and maybe not so twisted by his associatins with the GOP), Palin might have been tolerated because the odds were beter that he would survive 4 or 8 years. I was for Obama all the way (or Hillary if she had won the nomination) but my parents were not. Their dogged and zombiesque support of her was appalling. They would not admit that she was unfit to be the most powerful person on Earth. Anyway. Thank You JM for your pick it really helped!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Got us Obama Posted by: madmac10
» RE: Got us Obama Posted by: IPF
» RE: Got us Obama Posted by: bnays
2012
Posted by: CTvoter on Nov 10, 2008 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly hope the GOP puts her up again in 2012. It would be a cake-walk for the Dems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 2012 Posted by: weathered
» RE: 2012 Posted by: John Annis
» 2010 Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: 2010 Posted by: bouyant
A "Goodbye to Palin" piece is STILL a piece about Palin.
Posted by: -matti on Nov 10, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we nearing the end of this distraction now?

I sure hope so.

november5.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a fitting tribute
Posted by: 2thepoint on Nov 10, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to a women running for top office. It seems American media has taken on the vicious and baseless attack profile of the Engilsh media!

Articles and media attacks such as these could spur another surge in Palin supporters. Look for Senator Palin very soon!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Senator Palin Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: What a fitting tribute Posted by: munchkinpup
the Palin effect, with apologies to Michael Crichton
Posted by: QCao009 on Nov 10, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Katha, I suppose we should listen to you and thank Johnny Mac for this pick, then we should thank the RNC for the revealing convention in Minnesota, and Cindy for the clothes and jewelry she owns in contrast to underline their "class warfare", and last, but not least, the whole sale conversion of conservatives to their newly discovered Palin virtues of working womanhood.

Finally, I would like to thank God for this election. Only in America, can our political system run two women from two very different parties, who have nothing in common, and have the press turn them outside in, and then pat themselves for the high standard they set in their investigative professional work.

I thought we progressives pride ourselves from being different and somewhat more intelligent than the mainstream press lemmings? Guess not !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hello Again 2thepoint... Posted by: ~Fiona~
» RE: Hello Again 2thepoint... Posted by: 2thepoint
Think Again About Shrieking Sarah
Posted by: Midway54 on Nov 10, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've said it elsewhere: Judging from the adoration shown her by the Dupes, Cretins, and Lunatics who worship the scoundrels at Fox Newsfixers Channel, I predict she may very well appear as a frequent guest or co-anchor at Fox. Moreover, the Plutocrats have see her as having rightwing voter appeal and begin a propaganda campaign to get her into the Senate as their newest Stooge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Presenting..... Posted by: 2thepoint
Obama has already won the election big time ! Now leave her alone already !
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 10, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And PAY ATTENTION to Obama for a change. You do realize that his true colors are showing what with the cabinet that he's putting in place and the fact that he intends to do virtually NOTHING about more Wall $treet bailouts on the way, don't you? I swear, the author reminds me of the GOP bashing Clinton even after he left office. I wouldn't be surprised if the author were to go so far as to keeping Palin alive even to the point of keeping her on life support just to keep the bashing machine alive. Palin isn't a threat at this point and won't be as long as you idiots quit bringing her up. This is otherwise a perfect reason to validate Nader's claim that there isn't a difference between either side !

P.S.: And in case any of you out there were curious, yes my wife and I gave up Nader on the last minute and decided to just punch the ballot for Obama knowing that Nader's chances at anything were dimmer at this point. In any case, even Obama would completely disapprove of this article and the author and give her two words MOVE ON !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do you want to be taken seriously? Posted by: Bliss Doubt
GONG
Posted by: hadashito on Nov 10, 2008 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given her talent for appealing to an audience of cretins, while displaying an outsized ego, endless ambition, and little else of value to offer but bizzare entertainment for the aforementioned cretins, I suggest she appear as a regular feature on ostentatious freak shows like Jerry Springer show or the reported new version of the GONG Show. Alaska (and the rest of us) would be better off without her and she could "get off", as they say, on TV. A win-win situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

palin as fox news anchor
Posted by: raine1 on Nov 10, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She has experience, she has cleavage, she has a great smile and is snarky as all get out! Watch her become with Karl Rove, a different sort of media maven. She's MADE for FOX news, by gosh!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: palin as fox news anchor Posted by: jshubbub
Sarah Palin rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Posted by: knight on Nov 10, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author seem to miss a few points,Sarah attracted millions of voters to the polls,I did not know that I as a conservative was supposed to tell my wife to stay home and be submissive to me,in an islamic kind of a way,I didn t get that memo,then to compare Hillary with Sarah....are you kidding? Hillary attractive? are you kidding?....author here is a tip,put a beautiful,unqualified person saying a lot of giberish and rubish and you will get millions of fans,er followers after him/her having sexual dreams and fantasies and such,Obama was not elected bc he was brilliant,he was elected bc he is handsome and looks good giving a speech,but there is no substance,you could say the same about Sarah Palin,execpt that she has run a state and a city,small as they may be,but that counts as executive experience,so I say:Sarah....baby come back I ll be waiting...and yes Hillary is a witch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey,Ally Oop Posted by: cwilsondrum
saveusall
Posted by: saveusall on Nov 10, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This election, if nothing else, showed how the white, male media trashed just about every kind of female on the planet. America is riddled with regionalism, and we saw the "soccer mom", the "traveling pants suits", the "Joe-the-plumber's wives", the "coal miner's daughters", the "elegant elite", the "snakepit sallies", the "70-yr. old twenty-year olds", the Plains princesses", the "industry analysts", the "commentators'' from both sides, and "pure white trash", the "bar room bimbos"...what a ride? Now can you figure out which side each is on? Can YOU tell how they voted?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin will run for senate
Posted by: emopaul on Nov 10, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And when she does, the people from her hometown will be doing their best to see that she doesn't win:
Voices from Wasilla

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Palin will run for senate Posted by: maxpayne
Dan Quayle / Sarah Palin 2012
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Nov 10, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taking a reality look at women contenders
Posted by: halfsqtriangle on Nov 10, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, Sarah Palin is an embarrassment, especially to women.

I am sorry. I do not believe that Hillary Clinton is the hero for women, either. I wish women would stop it already. Clinton ran a terrible campaign, she played the tearful poor me, a woman game and the "boys are picking on me" game. She cackled and giggled and performed like a clown in one of the debates with Obama when she interruped him, backed off from her podium, bent over, cackled and clapped her hands in what she thought was a supreme gotcha moment. Then, there is the famous husband coatails matter. She claimed experience Obama did not have and will never have-that of being a first lady. She lied shamelessly more than once about dodging sniper fire and got her daughter to confirm the lie. Two women engaged in a blatant lie.

No, Sarah is dumb and a laughing stock. Hillary is not dumb but still,this Democrat, a woman, cannot now view her coatail hanger on hopes as a true representative of feminism. She played into all the sterotypical assumptions made toward women during her campaign. Obama a Muslim? HC answer:"Not that I know of" duh. Who brought up the tinge of racism toward Obama? Why Bill Clinton, the tag team coatail man himself. Who sublty brought up the possibility of an assisination by connecting Obama with Robert Kennedy, suggesting subliminal that Obama is likely to see the same fate as RK ? Why the experienced one herself.

Sorry, in my eyes, Palin is really dumb and ignorant and was dangerous. In my eyes, Hillary still is not the woman candidate I would vote for and it is about time to look at her in reality and stop treating her as if she was saving or saved feminisim and Obama's campaign.

Take a look at the millions who followed her, vowing to vote for McCain out of revenge when she did not win, who failed to understand it was HC herself, who wrecked her own campaign and not sexism, or unfairness because she was a woman. These are followers the feminists would court?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Angry much? Posted by: dudelette
I need a drink, or seven
Posted by: StephanieInCA on Nov 10, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good god, Sarah Palin makes my teeth itch. Can we please send her to some remote corner of the earth, like Mongolia, or the CW?

On the bright side: Good news from “the science” about why i have to get absolutely hosed every night to deal with Palin and her ilk. It’s because i'm so smrt!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I need a drink, or seven Posted by: YogiBear
To Russia With Love......
Posted by: richard0a37 on Nov 10, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1867, Russia sold Alaska to the United States for $7,200,000. Had that never happened, Sarah would have been Russian, and who knows, she could have been Putin's running mate, and then the USA really would have something to give it sleepless nights.

For Sarah fans, here are a couple of not-quite-so-well known facts about Russia.

The Russian philosopher Peter Ouspensky is regarded in academic circles as possibly the greatest thinker of the 20th century

The Russian physicist Poponin discovered the Phantom DNA Effect which says that various characteristics of a cavity filled with human DNA remain unchanged after the DNA has been removed - quite profound and disturbing implications.

And then we have all the Russian classical composers such as Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov, Borodin and a whole host of others who have brought us some of the most powerful and beautiful music we could ever hope to hear.

The great tragedy of countries having militaristic foreign policies is that it causes us to ignore their more humane and enriching characteristics. In reality, we should be embracing Russia rather than generating conflict and fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To Russia With Love...... Posted by: morticia
allen
Posted by: pursah on Nov 10, 2008 4:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about the now-fogotton huge flack earlier in the year over John Edward's $400 haircuts? Was that sexist? You can't have it both ways.

For Josephine and Joe the Plummer rallies, why weren't cloths off the rack from Sears and JC Penneys good enough for Sarah?

Lets face it. Palin and too many other people like her have put this country in the mess it is in today with their motto that can be sang to the US Army recruiting song. "Steal, all that you can steal!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Count Palin Out, Unfortunately
Posted by: ladyoracle on Nov 10, 2008 5:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could never stand Palin, and I'm positively relishing the dirt Newsweek journalists and McCain campaigners are dishing. But I don't think she's over. There are a lot of far-right conservatives who are talking about her for 2012. I feel like the less attention, even negative attention, that she gets from the media, the better.

Pollitt is right that the expansions made by the far-left in accepting Palin's candidacy, in terms of the teen pregnancy and working mom status. The arsenal of sexist arguments against future female candidates has been reduced on that account. I think it's true that the way for "a woman" in the white house has been perhaps paved, but she'll have to be careful that her clothes aren't too expensive, that she's attractive enough, but not so attractive that she's compared to Barbie (I never agreed as Palin is brunette, but meh).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Quite- corrections
Posted by: lugerotterpalin on Nov 10, 2008 7:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, that is not an Alaskan accent, its a slightly twisted Minnesotan accent.

second of all, Hillary was in the campaign for almost 2 years- Palin was not. If you think back, it was only this fall that she entered the race- we saw her on stage for a very limited time.

third of all, people DID say she belonged at home- in fact, many, many people did, and a lot of them were democrats, which is just ridiculous and shameful. People DID blame her for Bristol's pregnancy and said she was neglecting her duty as a mother by running. Also, republicans made it obvious by the contrast to their attitudes towards Hillary, that the only reason they suddenly supported women in politics is because Palin is so damn traditional and nonthreatening with her pretty ditzy-ness, and they wanted to sway democrat women- this in NO WAY means they will support women in politics in any other case- in fact, they wont, and neither will many democrats either, as proven by the multitudes of satire and critique on Palin's sex and not on her viewpoints, just as they did for Hillary.

Palin did nothing for feminism except undermine it and make it easier for conservative women to undermine it by claiming a voice for womens rights under the title "conservative feminists"-
she gave republican men a way to claim that they're "all for womens rights" when really, that couldnt be farther from the truth- while giving them material to push the idea that smart successful women= traditional, patriarchy-loving women. And ultimately, from the press coverage on both ends, she proved how sexist this country continues to be and what many people's values are when it comes to supporting a candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not Quite- corrections Posted by: munchkinpup
Not Quite- corrections
Posted by: lugerotterpalin on Nov 10, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, that is not an Alaskan accent, its a slightly twisted Minnesotan accent.

second of all, Hillary was in the campaign for almost 2 years- Palin was not. If you think back, it was only this fall that she entered the race- we saw her on stage for a very limited time.

third of all, people DID say she belonged at home- in fact, many, many people did, and a lot of them were democrats, which is just ridiculous and shameful. People DID blame her for Bristol's pregnancy and said she was neglecting her duty as a mother by running. Also, republicans made it obvious by the contrast to their attitudes towards Hillary, that the only reason they suddenly supported women in politics is because Palin is so damn traditional and nonthreatening with her pretty ditzy-ness, and they wanted to sway democrat women- this in NO WAY means they will support women in politics in any other case- in fact, they wont, and neither will many democrats either, as proven by the multitudes of satire and critique on Palin's sex and not on her viewpoints, just as they did for Hillary.

Palin did nothing for feminism except undermine it and make it easier for conservative women to undermine it by claiming a voice for womens rights under the title "conservative feminists"-
she gave republican men a way to claim that they're "all for womens rights" when really, that couldnt be further from the truth- while giving them material to push the idea that smart successful women= traditional, patriarchy-loving women. And ultimately, from the press coverage on both ends, she proved how sexist this country continues to be and what many people's values are when it comes to supporting a candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If only
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 10, 2008 11:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On Fox News, Palin claims a lot of misconceptions could have been cleared up only if, get this "And that was in mainstream media, the question that was asked, instead of just coming to me and -- and -- and you know, setting the record straight."

If only the media had spoken to her about things! Shows me once again what a load of hooey both the governor and Fox "News" are all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I sure will miss Alaska after it secedes
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Nov 11, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, one thing we do know for sure... Palin Derangement Syndrome is evidently an incurable, lifelong affliction.

I suppose it would all be merely amusing political theater if Alaska hadn't already once elected a governor from the Alaskan Independence Party (Walter Hickel, in 1990), not to mention how much the west coast needs Alaska's oil.

Oh, yea... oil. We almost forgot all about it there for a sec... The PDS'ers sure know how to bite the hand that helps fuel them.

So, what happens when Alaska secedes and decides not to sell any of its oil to the country which so obviously hates it and its beloved leader so much?

I'm sure many residents there are now seriously fermenting the full meaning/truth of the words of the AIP's founder (Joe Vogler): "I've got no use for America or her damned institutions." Big Media, and all those blue voters in the oil-dependent cities, are likely Exhibit #1, ingrates all.

Heck, maybe that other big lynchpin in our oil production infrastructure (Texas) will get similar ideas and follow them out of the union, too. And, if the current trend holds, next on the list of top oil producing states - very red Louisiana - and its governor, Bobby Jindal, will follow shortly thereafter.

Yep, the Dem's and all those blue voters sure are showing how super smart they are!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin is too polarizing to go anywhere
Posted by: bnays on Nov 11, 2008 3:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not worry one bit about a Sarah Palin presidency. She is one of those candidates who exclusively appeals to the party base and no one else. Her religious views are far too extreme, with her apocalyptic beliefs, to make people comfortable with her as commander-in-chief. Her first impression on the public was a mean spirited, dimwit, hardcore conservative, who showed a careerism streak a lot of people weren’t comfortable with by throwing McCain under the bus. Can she rehab that in 4 years? Also she has made a ton of enemies in her own party she will have to fend off in addition to her Democratic rivals. These McCain aides seem like they’d be perfectly happy with an Obama re-election if it meant ruining Palin’s dreams. And most importantly, with all the dirt dug up on her on the fly, what do you think can be uncovered in 4 year’s time for the election?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On occasion I have been a tad bit harsh with Sarah What's Er Name...
Posted by: MizuInOz on Nov 11, 2008 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why?" You may ask.

Because I am an egalitarian. If the Minoan Society (Read Riane Eisler's book - The Chalice and the Blade) was still flourishing, I'd immigrate.

And on the same note (F# above Middle C), I have learned from the indigenous people of Australia that there truly is men's business and women's business. I honour the diversity and yet insist upon egalitarian and equal rights - period.

Sarah What's 'Er Name represented the antithesis of this - to me. And I am sure I will be castigated by some for my comments but let me address why I feel the way I do.

She is a cheat and liar. She foments hatred, anger and potential violence - just for attention's sake. She plays dumb - this is an insult to women and men. Period.

Conversely, she acts like she knows things that it is acutely obvious that she does not and if she is caught like a moose in the headlights (which is how they are hunted in Alaska), she tries to bluff and bluster he way out of the situation and later acts like a she was victimised.

She uses her religion as a crutch to not be accountable in her life.

I was advised in one post that she has cleaned up Alaska corruption in politics. Oh, really. I guess all the information that has come out on her games is just BS, huh? The Alaska Pipeline programme overhaul is the best example of how she has "cleaned up" corruption. Go research for your self - don't believe me. Go read the public records

She cleaned up - all right. But not in an ethical way. I find it interesting that she refused to listen to a bipartisan evaluation of she and her husband's activities (not just TrooperGate) and how they were unethical - but a "independent" evaluation of partisan loyalists was acceptable.

She is a traitor - she supports the secession of Alaska from the Union. she should be removed from office and given a special room in Gitmo, as far as I am concerned.

I could go on. I researched for hours (I do not sleep much) because I wanted to understand why McCain had selected her over some pretty brilliant women (not just pretty - which, by the way - I must have a different standard for pretty because she is far from anywhere close to pretty for me) in politics to stand by him. Even the fawning Governor of Hawaii is pretty moxie.

So, I go back to my major premise about Don't Let The Door Hit You On the Way Out Palin - she is 100% accountable for her actions and statements and BS.

Period.

And as a feminist, she would know that and own it.

It appears, IMHO, that she does not have those two cards in her deck.

Cheers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No, Palin's not done by a longshot
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 11, 2008 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will grant Governor Palin a successful hush-up of her firing a state official to get revenge on a state cop. Hey, everybody does that to staties.

The law isn't done with her yet. It came out that she was spending tens of thousands of state dollars to move her kids around for free. It's one thing for a sitting governor to fly at state expense and another for her kids to fly on the public dime. Her kids weren't elected to anything. Therefore it's a form of nepotism. It might be felony embezzlement, but that's for the judge to decide.

One more loose end. The Daily Kos used to be dead sure that Bristol dropped out of school and out of sight exactly when she became pregnant, then had her baby this past February. The Governor, meanwhile, was running gut-wrenching wind sprints at 5 months and her staff was shocked at her announcement that she was 7 months pregnant in December.

Best guess, the Governor was covering for Bristol in a poorly concocted scheme. Look, Bristol, granny will have the baby, you just take care of the kid, and everything will be stainless down at the church.

So Bristol's baby was coming out in Feb. Granny waited until she finished with a big speech down south and then told people her water broke, and then she hopped a grueling series of planes back to Wasilla. Medically crazy on granny's part if she did have the baby coming.

The Republican Convention rolled around. OK, granny's caught in a big lie and has to back it up. So, the new lie: poor Bristol now has to be officially five months pregnant as of August. The kid is officially due after the election, but Bristol already looked a bit thinner at the end of the VP debate.

Guess what! It's almost December, and time for Bristol to look really fat and then fake a "miscarriage". Medically, the Palin family has to make their theoretical baby disappear into thin air! How hard is that? What will the coroner have to say about the cause of the baby's death?

The issue here is not that Bristol got pregnant--that happens to lots and lots of teens, and we can feel sympathy. The issue is that Barracuda, the one who wants our votes, was a bizarre liar. Tell the truth to the Christian Right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Farewell???
Posted by: muzunguhowru on Nov 12, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much as she repulses me, like a lot of people I felt that the shots taken at SP by the anonymous McCain staffers were classless and unnecessary, However her behavior in the last few days pretty well shows what they were trying to deal with and why they came to loath her. She is nakedly ambitious, loyal to no one but herself and as shallow as ever. She clearly has become addicted to the limelight and isn't going anywhere. Lookout GOP you may get just what you deserve, The good news: a telegenic ideologue who parrots your basest sleaziest ideals and can own your base. The bad news: A "me first" con woman who will throw you under the snow machine in a minute to get what she wants and an endless source of ridicule by anyone who can read or form a complete sentence. Ask John McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin launching a new online shopping site?
Posted by: zenboy on Nov 13, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rumor has it that Sarah Palin is now launching her very own online shopping website (called YouBetcha.com). Full story here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jazmin623
Posted by: jazmin623 on Nov 13, 2008 9:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dislike her intensely & am not sure why. Someone said I was jealous because she's 'all women' yet I couldn't disagree more. There are multiple reasons for me to hate her-- as an animal activist she repulses me, but would I hate a man for being an avid moose hunter? Probably, but a woman blasting moose & wolves away from helicopters, or threatening to sue the Bush Admin. & the EPA if they classified Polar Bears as endangered species makes her that much more revolting.

Shouldn't a woman have a little more empathy for living things than that? Plus her stance on abortion, wanting her daughter to birth a rape baby is unforgivable.

And what's up with her pretend down syndrome baby? Is it really hers or Bristols? If she is the Mother did she have to give birth at 44 years of age, increasing the chance of just that sort of complication becoming reality? My God, I thank Him & everyone who voted for seeing through her phony 'folksy charm' and running in the opposite direction. I could only imagine how many decades she would have set the animal rights movement & women's issues back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]