Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Depraved Right-Wing Attack Efforts Go Down in Flames

By Alexander Zaitchik, AlterNet. Posted November 7, 2008.


Voters rejected right-wing attacks on reproductive and labor rights in California, Colorado and South Dakota.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Howard Jarvis must be spinning in his Hollywood Hills grave. Exactly 30 years after the California Republican spearheaded Proposition 13, the landmark ballot initiative that slashed property taxes in the Golden State and heralded the Reagan Revolution, voters on Tuesday rejected every major tax-cutting initiative put before them. In Massachusetts, Oregon and North Dakota, attempts to cut income and corporate taxes at the expense of state budgets went down in flames. On the night Democrats took back the White House and expanded their Congressional majorities, voters also repulsed right-wing attacks on reproductive and labor rights in California, Colorado and South Dakota.

There were also setbacks. In Arizona and California, gay marriage was banned; in the latter's case, the vote overturned a state Supreme Court decision. Also in California, the failure of Prop. 5 delayed the expansion of drug rehabilitation at the expense of criminalization for nonviolent offenders. In Arkansas, legislation was approved that restricts gay adoption and fostering. In Nebraska, a state that is 94 percent white, affirmative action programs were brought to an end. As of this writing, it is still uncertain whether this will also be the case for the more diverse state of Colorado.

But the 2008 initiative scorecard totals more victories than failures, and it reflects the same broad political sentiment in the country in favor of progressive change that was expressed in the election of Barack Obama. From coast to coast, voters passed progressive initiatives and referenda addressing everything from drug policy reform to alternative energy. But the biggest winner of the night was health policy: Five states approved important health care measures, from stem cell research and medical marijuana legislation in Michigan to long-term care and assisted suicide in Washington.

"Despite the lack of an overarching national narrative, there were a slew of ballot victories for progressive causes," says Kristina Wilfore, director of the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center. "It was a fairly big victory overall."

Although only 24 states allow for the increasingly popular option of "direct democracy" through ballot initiatives, nearly 70 percent of the U.S. population lives in a state or city that allows citizens to bypass state and national legislatures. These laws are of course subject to reversal by court ruling, but more than 2 out of 3 initiative reforms stick on average, moving the chains forward in front of cautious lawmakers fearful of perceived political ledges and third rails. Based on the economic initiatives that have dominated the last two cycles -- minimum wage and health care -- the ballot initiative appears to be swinging back in the direction intended by the progressives who conceived the idea at the turn of the last century.

"Voters in the early 20th century used (initiatives) to increase spending on public schools and welfare, progressive acts in the face of legislatures dominated by conservative interests," says John Matsusaka, author of For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy and American Democracy.

As the number of initiatives and referenda placed on ballots across the country continues to grow, it can be easy to lose track of what was approved and rejected. Below is a brief rundown of some of Tuesday's ballot initiative highlights.

Reproductive Rights

Anti-abortion rights groups had tried to get abortion restrictions placed on the ballot in seven states, but only three made it. All were rejected. Colorado's Amendment 48 would have defined "personhood" as beginning at conception; California's Proposition 4 would have required parental notification for abortions involving minors; and South Dakota's Measure 11 would have established a state legal challenge to most cases of abortion, which proponents had hoped to bring before the Supreme Court to force a revisiting of Roe v. Wade. In Colorado, failure was compounded by damaging intra-movement warfare, with the national board of Right to Life booting the state chapter from the organization for insubordination.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, ballot initiatives

Alexander Zaitchik is a freelance journalist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The expendable minority
Posted by: Figfest on Nov 7, 2008 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even more annoying and hurtful than the results themselves is the presumption by our liberal "friends" here that the anti-gay votes in California, Florida and elsewhere are minor matters, dealt with in passing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The expendable minority Posted by: Lauren
» You are not safe in your assumptions Posted by: Philip Newton
» Minority? Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: The expendable minority Posted by: cmaciain
ForestDinizen
Posted by: ForestDinizen on Nov 7, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arkansas did not pass a ban on gay marriage. That was not on the ballot. What Arkansas did was pass a ban on any unmarried persons living together becoming foster or adoptive parents. This act prevents gay or straight cohabitating persons from adopting or fostering, no matter what the people charged with protecting the interests of children believe is in their best interests. And prevents even family members from fostering or adopting their family's children regardless of the parents' wishes. The act was opposed by child advocacy groups, judges and religious leaders but the supporters' agenda to preclude gay adoption and fostering won out. It is terrible legislation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ForestDinizen Posted by: Lauren
The Light Dawns
Posted by: Arlene on Nov 7, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The failure of anti-abortion initiatives shows that the general public may finally get it. After last year's Carhart v Gonzalez Supreme Court decision, the courts can no longer be counted on to protect reproductive rights. Unfortunately it will take a long time for the damage to be undone and for the US to achieve parity with other developed nations on this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Light Dawns Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The Light Dawns Posted by: cmaciain
The results show...
Posted by: Philip Newton on Nov 7, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The results of the election show that Americans remain progressive on pocketbook issues and centrist on social issues.

To the extent that Democrats get this, they will succeed. If they ignore this reality, they will fail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environment initiatives
Posted by: jleman on Nov 7, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Minnesota voted to put on a state constitutional admendment to dictate a state sales tax to go toward cleaning up our lakes and streams, forty percent of which were found to be polluted. Evidently, the voters were tired of just hearing about it but nothing happening, so they have tried to take it out of the hands of special interest soaked legislators and the governor's office. Now, we had better keep an eye on the governor to make sure the money gets to where it is intended.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nvironment initiatives Posted by: Lauren
We need NATIONAL balot initiatives to expand these reforms
Posted by: Evan Ravitz on Nov 7, 2008 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Californians and D.C. dwellers know, the Fed has no respect for citizen laws, constantly jailing legal medical marijuana users, etc.

Huge majorities would also like to stop perpetual war and debt, torture, warrantless spying, bailouts for the hyper-rich, etc.

Unless you can outbid the military/industrial complex, the pharmaceutical lobby, etc., you have no power over Congress.

So we need NATIONAL ballot initiatives, which have kept Switzerland's Parliament representative and humble since 1891.

Registered voters can now vote to ratify the National Initiative for Democracy, led by Sen. Mike Gravel, at http://Vote.org, much as citizens ratified the Constitution at the Conventions when the 13 Legislatures refused.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ohio has initiative and referenda
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 8, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but it is quite hard to get issues on the ballots unless you can afford to pay solicitor to get signatures. that why we have had four casino proposals put on the ballot in last 15 years and they will try again.meanwhile unless you can get a sponsor in state legislature, it is harder get on ballot so single payer health care or instant runoff voting or anti gerrymandering initiatives go nowhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]