COMMENTS: 111
The Obama Administration: Who Could Get Picked?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2008 headlines via email.
Even before voting began, Washington was abuzz over what a Democratic White House might resemble.
In recent days an outline of an Obama administration has begun to emerge -- both in the rumor mill and in press reports. The campaign itself has specifically and repeatedly denied any efforts as such. But sources confirm that advisers to the Senator are already plotting out the staffing of key cabinet positions. And the picture presented is one of experience, talent and bipartisanship.
Chief of Staff
The key figure here is Rahm Emanuel, who is already rumored to be the front man for the job. The Associated Press has reported that the Obama transition team is making overtures to the Illinois congressman, reports which both sides have played down. People in the know, meanwhile, are saying the likelihood is Rahm will be offered the post and will likely say yes - he has experience in the White House, connections and respect on Capitol Hill, and the combative, competitive demeanor that might be an asset for the post.
If for some unforeseen reason Emanuel doesn't work out (sources say he's that much of a lock), the other names being bantered around are John Podesta, the current topper of the Center for American Progress and former chief of staff for Bill Clinton, and Tom Daschle, who has served as a key Obama adviser throughout the campaign and is formerly the Senate Majority Leader.
Attorney General
Janet Napolitano seems in line for this key-ranking position, which became a controversial post under the stewardship of Alberto Gonzales. The current Governor of Arizona is close with Obama, having endorsed his candidacy early on. And sources say that she wouldn't mind the move to D.C. What may end up deciding the appointment, however, is that Eric Holder - who served briefly as AG under Bill Clinton and headed Obama's vice presidential search committee - doesn't want to go through the rigors of a confirmation process and could take himself out of the running.
Secretary of State
This could be the big surprise. Sen. Dick Lugar, a Republican from Indiana may be, according to high-ranking Democrats, Obama's man for the job. The two have worked closely on several issues, none more so than securing loose nukes in former Soviet nations. But Democrats may not warm to the idea of an opposition party member getting an important foreign policy post (a complex to which liberals in particular are tired of being subjected). In light of that, Obama could consider -- and is rumored to be thinking about -- Sen. John Kerry, former U.N. Ambassador Dick Holbrooke, current foreign policy adviser Susan Rice and Greg Craig, another top Obama foreign policy adviser. Among cabinet positions, this seems to be one of the most wide open.
Treasury Secretary
For, perhaps, this most important position, Obama has a slew of options. The individual that sources say is rising closest to the top is former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, who has been a key endorser of the Obama candidacy in these tough economic times. At the same time, Obama could turn to Warren Buffet, though there is little indication that the Oracle of Omaha wants the job. Or he could look outside the box and tap Michael Bloomberg, though the New York City mayor is seeking a third term in office.
Defense Secretary
The consensus is emerging that, at least for the time being, Obama will keep current header Robert Gates in the cabinet. The job extension would provide the Illinois Democrat the cover he needs to reverse course in Iraq without risking charges of overt partisanship on the issue. Here too, however, there are a host of different names from which Obama can choose his own appointee. These include Republicans such as Sens. Chuck Hagel and Lugar, as well as Democrats like Sen. Jack Reed - a strong congressional voice on foreign policy - Holbrooke and Richard Danzig, former Secretary of the Navy and another key Obama endorser/adviser.
All of this, of course, is speculation. And the list above excludes a bevy of names that have been rumored to be in the running for respective positions. But, from conversations with Washington insiders and in-the-know Democrats, it seems clear that the process of dwindling down the long lists of potential cabinet members has already begun. And the names emerging represent the type of politics that Obama has preached: competent, non-rigid, and above partisanship.
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2008 headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 5, 2008 2:22 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dennis Kuchinich
*rehire the attorneys/staff that gonzales/mukasey displaced.
Secty of Defense
Murtha
Surgeon General
Deepak Chopra
FBI/CIA
profound reviews&purge
Bring in quality outside leadership.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Critical choices
Posted by: craighorowitz
» I wish you were right, but already he has announced CFR advisors....
Posted by: Prophit
» AG: David Inglesia, Treasury Sec. Peter Orzsag...
Posted by: TJColatrella
» RE: Critical choices
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 5, 2008 2:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bust Murdocks control, its a dangerous monopoly of mis and disinformation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Damn, I second that along with the others as well........ in fact...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 5, 2008 2:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need seasoned integrity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: craighorowitz
» Oh, right. Carter who was managed by Zbig Brezsinzki.....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: Doyle Wheeler
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: babs
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: Quannah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: K_for_Kansas on Nov 5, 2008 3:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretary of Agriculture might not be the sexiest of roles, but it's of vital importance for all of us, and Ken Meter has the experience, intelligence and sense of the Big Picture that can help this country make a transition from AgriBusiness, with its terrible economic, social and environmental tolls, to sustainable, regional food systems.
For more:
http://www.crcworks.org/meter.pdf
http://www.crcworks.org/rural.html
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» People who I think should serve under an Obama Administration (and please be nice)...
Posted by: FireKittie1982
Comments are closed-
Posted by: K_for_Kansas on Nov 5, 2008 3:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Close APIAC
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Close APIAC
Posted by: rhinojos
» I third that. Remember I was the one critical of Obama....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I third that. Remember I was the one critical of Obama....
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Department of Peace
Posted by: AndyF
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Teller on Nov 5, 2008 3:55 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: marcyincny
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: vkobaya1
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: OldRedleg
» I give Gates credit too, its because of him that we did not attack....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Yes.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Nov 5, 2008 4:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
while we're at it, indite and arrest the entire cabal of bushites for treason and insurrection, then off to the fed pen for life with no parole...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Close down DEA and "Homeland Security"
Posted by: xvictor
» RE: Close down DEA and "Homeland Security"
Posted by: dustdevil
» Begin sending your recommendations to him along with names....
Posted by: Prophit
» Add NADER over CMS/DHHS RE: Begin sending your recommendations to him along with names....
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Close down DEA and "Homeland Security"
Posted by: Sushi
» ellie
Posted by: socialpsych
» There is nothing "sort of" about it. It was picked intentionally....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xvictor on Nov 5, 2008 5:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahahaha, great idea, except it would never get by Pelosi and ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vkobaya1 on Nov 5, 2008 5:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Shudder! Rahm Emanual
Posted by: OldRedleg
» Wow, great minds and all that..... its exactly what I said above.
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 5, 2008 6:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretary of Interior. Home of the Minerals Management Service, busted for cocaine- and prostitution-influenced contracting processes.
Secretary of Energy. Home of "clean coal" propaganda efforts and nuclear weapons contracting. Gives lip service to "clean energy" by which they mean nuclear and coal.
Secretary of Agriculture. Works closely with trade and commerce to open foreign markets in Asia and Africa and Central America to U.S. exports.
Here are the rest. You'll get a much better idea of what Obama's policies will really be by looking at his choice of appointments to these posts, then you will by listening to any speech:
Secretary of Commerce.
Chairman of Federal Reserve.
Secretary of Housing and Human Development
Secretary of Homeland Security
Secretary of Health and Human Services (FDA)
EPA Administrator
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veteran's Affairs
National Intelligence Director
US Trade Representative
Director of National Drug Policy
Office of Management and Budget
For example, this was a record year for U.S. oversees weapons sales. Will that continue under an Obama Administration? Will our foreign policy continue to rotate around efforts to gain access to oil reserves? Will we see more undemocratic trade agreements like NAFTA? Will Obama pursue a NAFTA with Colombia, say? Will the FDA head be an ex-pharmaceutical CEO? (Buffet has huge investments in fossil fuels, both coal and oil, by the way - his appointment as head of Treasury would be a sure sign of the continuation of the status quo.)
Nobody knows much about any of this, because our godawful media didn't cover the core issues very well during this election. Everyone knows about Bill Ayers, but no one has any idea who Obama will pick as Secretary of Energy. If he picks a corporate insider linked to the fossil fuel or nuclear industry, then that will mean one thing. If he doesn't - say he picks the head of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory instead - then that will mean something else.
Wait and see...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That is the best "5" commentary I have seen in a long time..... good job.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Left out a lot...
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erik1968 on Nov 5, 2008 6:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seriously, ew. And Emahnuel is even worse. And LUGAR? Again, was Pat Buchanan too liberal?
I really was hoping to enjoy this for a few days. But in all seriousness, it's up to US to make sure this doesn't happen.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THERE ARE PROGRESSIVE VOICES IN THIS ADMINISTRATION!!
It's up to us! We got him elected after all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I am holding off my "told ya so" until after we have given him...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 5, 2008 6:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very Sincerely,
~Josephine Sixpack~
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oh, man, you were doing sooooo goood and then threw in Sarah Palin....
Posted by: Prophit
» But....
Posted by: ~Fiona~
» Oh, I agree, but she does not rate up there with the real destroyers and power brokers.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Oh, I agree, but she does not rate up there with the real destroyers and power brokers.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Liberty G on Nov 5, 2008 6:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My pick for head of the EPA: Lincoln Chafee, the former moderate Republican Senator from my own state of RI. He is a statesman, intelligent, principled, honest, brave, and a passionate environmentalist, as was his father, Sen. John Chafee, before him.
Linc only lost his race to Sheldon Whitehouse (who has turned out to be another excellent legislator, by the way)because people in RI wanted so much to have a Democratic Congress.
Chafee is still a highly respected individual - and deserves it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How About A Protector of Our Environmental Life Support System?
Posted by: Hans B
» RE: How About A Protector of Our Environmental Life Support System?
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JakobFabian01 on Nov 5, 2008 6:50 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Democrats rule, you get bipartisan government. To the Democrats, bipartisanship means triangulation, that is, choosing the midpoint between the Republican position, no matter how insane, and the position of the Democratic Party's ideological base. This tradition, for better or for worse, accounts for Obama's unimpressive cabinet picks.
Two cheers for the return of two-party government!
But as several commenters have already said, real change is up to us. Let me suggest that part of our strategy should be proportional representation. Change the electoral system so that we can use instant-runoff voting and empower Greens and Libertarians to challenge the duopoly effectively. Then we'll have what most European countries have -- multi-party government and the possibility that in the future, mere bipartisanship will mean something other than gridlock -- what about a Dem-Green coalition?
In the longer term, I'd favor Constitutional reform to reduce the monarchical power of the Presidential veto and to give us a unicameral Congress -- one that represents populations, not land masses, as the House of Representatives does.
These are the structural reforms that we need. However we may curse and gnash our teeth at Democratic "cowardice," we have to realize that this is a structural as well as ideological problem.
Obama's victory (his victory over Hillary Clinton as well as that over McCain) is a sign that progressives have finally begun to loosen the ideological straitjacket of plutocracy that has heretofore held both of our major parties -- even though much more has to be done. Now, we should think about moving on to reform the plutocratic structure of our government. Obama's cautious centrism, like that of the Clintons before him, should be a reminder of the work that we have to do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eturn of Bipartisanship
Posted by: reelman
» Monopartisan: Exhibit A
Posted by: JakobFabian01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: covalentbonded on Nov 5, 2008 7:25 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Chinese (I think) said that one should be careful of what one asks for - one might get exactly that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Chinese also have a curse they use that may fit here....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Change? What change?
Posted by: Hans B
» RE: Change? What change?
Posted by: Sushi
» Time for whine is over
Posted by: nomomorons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ffrf.org on Nov 5, 2008 7:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vice President: Joseph Biden
Attorney General: Henry Waxman
Dept. Att. General: David Iglesias (Republican)
Fired Fmr. US Attorney, New Mexico
Secretary of State: Gov. Bill Richardson
Secretary of Defense: Franklin C. (Chuck) Spinney
Franklin C. "Chuck" Spinney is an American former military analyst for the Pentagon who became famous in the early 1980s for what became known as the "Spinney Report", criticizing what he described as the reckless pursuit of costly complex weapon systems by the Pentagon, with disregard to budgetary consequences. Despite attempts by the his superiors to bury the controversial report, it eventually was exposed during a United States Senate Budget Committee on Defense hearing, which though scheduled to go unnoticed, made the cover of Time Magazine March 7, 1983.
Sec. Commerce: Paul Krugman or Robert Reich, or, Amy Domini
Founder, CEO Domini Social Investments for direct support of communities.
Sec. Treasury: Alisa Gravitz
Alisa Gravitz is Executive Director of Co-op America—publisher of the National Green Pages, the authoritative guide to environmentally and socially responsible products and businesses. Alisa is one of the leading figures in the socially responsible investment movement—which has now grown to over $1.2 trillion, and a founder of the Green Festivals.
Sec. Agriculture: Russ Feingold
Sec. Education: Ruth Simmons
President of Brown University
Sec. Energy: Daniel M. Kammen
Alternative Energy guru and Berekley Professor of Energy and Resources, Chair of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory, and Professor of Public Policy, Distinguished Chair in Energy. Advisor for US and Swiss International Development, IPC working group III (UN)
Sec. of VA: Max Cleland
Sec. HHS: Howard Dean
Sec. HUD: Roxanne Qualls
Fmr. Mayor of Cincinnati, Urban development and transportation expert.
Sec. Interior: Wilma Mankiller
Wilma Mankiller, former Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, lives on the land which was allotted to her paternal grandfather, John Mankiller, just after Oklahoma became a state in 1907. Mankiller was the first female in modern history to lead a major Native American tribe. With an enrolled population of over 140,000, and an annual budget of more than $75 million, and more than 1,200 employees spread over 7,000 square miles, her task may have been equalled to that of a chief executive officer of a major corporation.
Sec. Labor: Alan B. Krueger
He has published widely on the economics of education, terrorism, labor demand, income distribution, social insurance, labor market regulation and environmental economics. Since 1987 he has held a joint appointment in the Economics Department and Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University. He is the founding Director of the Princeton University Survey Research Center and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research and of the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). He is the author of What Makes A Terrorist. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the Russell Sage Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, and the American Institutes for Research. He is a member of the editorial board of Science, and was editor of the Journal of Economic Perspectives from 1996 to 2002 and co-editor of the Journal of the European Economic Association from 2003-05. In 1994-95 he served as Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor.
Sec. Transportation: Hank Dittmar
Chief Executive of The Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Congress for the New Urbanism
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Some of these I don't know, but sound like they would be good.
Posted by: Prophit
» DOUBLE-CROSS OUT MANKILLER! RE: My Obama Administration
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: DOUBLE-CROSS OUT MANKILLER! RE: My Obama Administration
Posted by: ffrf.org
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tmwright on Nov 5, 2008 8:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a great NSC or DOD chief to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How about a spot for Wes Clark
Posted by: desertlakes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: desertlakes on Nov 5, 2008 8:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Gates had a role in illegal wiretapping, when he was in Reagan's white house. I do not see that he has a place in any open Government. Chuck Hagel has been more of a maverick than those who laid claim to the title. I'd like to see Naomi Klein and Antonia Juhacz in his cabinet. There are excellent people from Progressive think tanks that would do great jobs. We do not need to stick with AEI, Heritage, Cato, Brookings,etc. There policies didn't work. It's time for a true new world. President Roosevelts (Teddy and FDR) were Progressive. They did not use Hoover and McKinley's policies. They did not use their people.
President Bush put in so many mid level people on their ideology not their skills, that President Obama will have to take out and replace with skilled and thinking people. I can't wait to see who he puts in Agriculture (who is not pro Agri business but pro farmer), Energy, Interior. Our world is changing from the outside with Global Warming. We have such an opportunity!!!! I hope he puts the solar panels back on the White House that Jimmy Carter had on the White House, that Ronald Reagan took off.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Nov 5, 2008 8:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fervently hope all the ex- Clinton people are not going to comprise the new administration, which would be a real slap in the face. Here are some thoughts:
A Secretary of the Interior who actually cares about the environment and sustainable living, saving our Old Growth forests and Redwoods.
(Barbara Boxer?)
A Surgeon-General/Healthcare official who respects women's rights. opposes slaughterhouse cruelty to animals, etc. (Andrew Weil?)
The following should be considered:
Wesley Clark (Secretary of Defense?)
Dennis Kucinich (Secretary of the Interior)
Jim Webb
Chuck Hagel
Russ Feingold
Hillary Clinton (Attorney General?)
Any thoughts?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» HAGEL???? The father of the bogus voting machines for the repubs???/
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: HAGEL???? The father of the bogus voting machines for the repubs???/
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: nomomorons
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: marykane
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whipmeco on Nov 5, 2008 9:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rachel Maddow- Press Secretary
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please also include
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Please also include
Posted by: jugdish88
» RE: Please also include
Posted by: Quakermom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whipmeco on Nov 5, 2008 9:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not Emmanuel
Posted by: jareilly
» RE: Not Emmanuel
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 5, 2008 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But hey that's just me...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Except for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: xcept for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: TJColatrella
» RE: xcept for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: xcept for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: TJColatrella
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nomomorons on Nov 5, 2008 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've achieved some "mellow" after this election.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Given Obama's incredible--and verified--capacity
Posted by: 6399
» RE: Given Obama's incredible--and verified--capacity
Posted by: onevoter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 6399 on Nov 5, 2008 11:21 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I wonder who's going to be whispering in Obama's ear when Iran decides to go full speed ahead with that nucular weapons program? What do you think he'll be whispering? Sweet nothings?
ObamaBots, time to start writing those indignant letters you promised. Remember promising that you would hammer the Messiah when he made a poor decision? Well, he just did, so how 'bout it? Or does he get a pass because "he's the one"?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, lets recycle party insiders. Nothing like "Change we can believe in"
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Nov 5, 2008 11:26 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So here, Sam Stein, you start with speculating on which worn-out retreads, hacks and has-beens president-elect Obama should populate his cabinet with.
I mean, really now, if Obama's win represents a change, let it start with his cabinet picks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abuelo1 on Nov 5, 2008 12:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nobody more qualified for Secy of State
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: have we forgotten somebody?
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avatar_singh on Nov 5, 2008 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Clinton was elected in 1992 BC was saying that it was worrisome for the british foreing office because Clinton might want peaceful settlement in Ireland. No worry. Within 3 weeks of Clinton eelction the british bastards brought him into their grip.. But the same B and british were very happy when in 1994 and 1996 this Clinton lost congress to conservative majority-proof that british friendship was only to neautralize Clinton from straying from so called neutral attitude to uk.
In fact in the 1988 American election B.B.C. had invited the chief drug dealer of BAT-i.e. british american tobacco-(who of course is an englishman) and there was another American there. During discussion of Ducassis' candidature the B.B.C. anchor man suggested to the American that the opponent of bush was hardly an American as he looked to dark and was Greek, the country of geek being too much near Africa. It really happened. This shows a few things. According to B.B.C. not only Blacks were not American but also all those who the english agents have labelled ethnic Americans. In fact B.B.C. openly said (in that program-usually B.B.C. does not reveal its evil intention so easily) that the American means actually anglo-saxons. The whole propaganda and racial slur was provided by BBC.
the way George H.W. Bush finished off Michael Dukakis in 1988. Lee Atwater, Bush’s smear manager, picked up Al Gore’s use of Horton – the black rapist furloughed for a weekend, under a law passed by Gov. Dukakis – and retooled it, throwing in slurs about Dukakis as being some foreign outsider
Don't confuse that white includes Germans either. The same English agents (in America) who created a monstrous film like ``birth of nation`` are the same people who crated prohibition only because many German immigrants were drinking bear and they did not like it. It is the same england sympathiser crowd who went on killing blacks, Irish,
etc -
now how come about that every President who wanted to take stand indendent of Britain in America on Domestic or Foreign has eithr been made impotent or killed(Abraham Lincoln, Kennedy,Robert Kennedy)?To understand that one has to remember British propaganda machinary(all sorts of media,BBB.,Papars, govt,etc) and britihs agents in America.Britain has always acted like a heyena(or dog) who let two or Three Lions(OF Europe like France, Germans
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulC on Nov 5, 2008 3:15 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pelosi is a coward who wants to minimize her own concept of risk. This conforms to her utter lack of leadership skills and complete lack of vision coming from a gross lack of understanding of the issues.
If Obama falls into this trap as well then we all lose big time - our chance to grab the brass ring of change will be lost forever.
Obama MUST show daring and vision in his selections - he MUST pick academics at the forefront of their field, as JFK did, new blood who project a sense of confidence and willingness to change.
How can a leader project leadership and vision by making dull, frightened, uninspired appointments?? It defies common sense.
The worst thing Obama could do is go Pelosi on us and become a walking zombie, one of the un-dead.
peace,
Paul
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: onevoter on Nov 5, 2008 6:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Treasury: Paul Krugman (Nobel Prize in Economics)
Attorney General: Laurence Tribe
Defense: Colin Powell
Health & Human Services: Dennis Kucinich
Communications Director: Rachel Maddow
Veteran's Affairs: Max Cleland
Interior: Ben Knighthorse Campbell
Surgeon General: Dr. Andrew Weil
Education: Me! ( a veteran teacher of 22 years)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Cabinet Picks
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Cabinet Picks
Posted by: reelman
» RE: Cabinet Picks
Posted by: onevoter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weslen1 on Nov 5, 2008 8:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then I'd make darn sure to get someone for Dept. of Defense who DOESN'T think it's a GOOD idea to sell NUKES to every other country on earth, and who thinks it's BETTER to PROTECT this country than to INVADE other countries for oil or any other reason.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sallyride on Nov 5, 2008 9:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go outdoors, and enjoy life - if you can stay awake - we're all suffering withdrawal symptoms, right now. This campaign has made a lot of us refined researchers and politicos, just to keep sane, and we need a 12-Step Program to recover from the abuse of these past months. It'll be hard enough to let-go, but lets-do, to be ready to volunteer in our own communities when we need to step up to help Obama.
I can't even add any posts to my blog!
Sorry but I only wanted to stop by, but had to open my mouth one more time. Night all!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» THE TIME OF PUNISH IS NEAR
Posted by: reelman
» RE: THE TIME OF PUNISH IS NEAR
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bemf on Nov 6, 2008 12:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.mediamouse.org/features/110608obama.php
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 5, 2008 2:22 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dennis Kuchinich
*rehire the attorneys/staff that gonzales/mukasey displaced.
Secty of Defense
Murtha
Surgeon General
Deepak Chopra
FBI/CIA
profound reviews&purge
Bring in quality outside leadership.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Critical choices
Posted by: craighorowitz
» I wish you were right, but already he has announced CFR advisors....
Posted by: Prophit
» AG: David Inglesia, Treasury Sec. Peter Orzsag...
Posted by: TJColatrella
» RE: Critical choices
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 5, 2008 2:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bust Murdocks control, its a dangerous monopoly of mis and disinformation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Damn, I second that along with the others as well........ in fact...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 5, 2008 2:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need seasoned integrity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: craighorowitz
» Oh, right. Carter who was managed by Zbig Brezsinzki.....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: Doyle Wheeler
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: babs
» RE: Secty of State
Posted by: Quannah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: K_for_Kansas on Nov 5, 2008 3:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretary of Agriculture might not be the sexiest of roles, but it's of vital importance for all of us, and Ken Meter has the experience, intelligence and sense of the Big Picture that can help this country make a transition from AgriBusiness, with its terrible economic, social and environmental tolls, to sustainable, regional food systems.
For more:
http://www.crcworks.org/meter.pdf
http://www.crcworks.org/rural.html
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» People who I think should serve under an Obama Administration (and please be nice)...
Posted by: FireKittie1982
Comments are closed-
Posted by: K_for_Kansas on Nov 5, 2008 3:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Close APIAC
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Close APIAC
Posted by: rhinojos
» I third that. Remember I was the one critical of Obama....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I third that. Remember I was the one critical of Obama....
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Department of Peace
Posted by: AndyF
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Teller on Nov 5, 2008 3:55 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: marcyincny
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: vkobaya1
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: OldRedleg
» I give Gates credit too, its because of him that we did not attack....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Yes.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Tell me again why...
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Nov 5, 2008 4:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
while we're at it, indite and arrest the entire cabal of bushites for treason and insurrection, then off to the fed pen for life with no parole...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Close down DEA and "Homeland Security"
Posted by: xvictor
» RE: Close down DEA and "Homeland Security"
Posted by: dustdevil
» Begin sending your recommendations to him along with names....
Posted by: Prophit
» Add NADER over CMS/DHHS RE: Begin sending your recommendations to him along with names....
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: Close down DEA and "Homeland Security"
Posted by: Sushi
» ellie
Posted by: socialpsych
» There is nothing "sort of" about it. It was picked intentionally....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xvictor on Nov 5, 2008 5:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahahaha, great idea, except it would never get by Pelosi and ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vkobaya1 on Nov 5, 2008 5:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Shudder! Rahm Emanual
Posted by: OldRedleg
» Wow, great minds and all that..... its exactly what I said above.
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 5, 2008 6:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretary of Interior. Home of the Minerals Management Service, busted for cocaine- and prostitution-influenced contracting processes.
Secretary of Energy. Home of "clean coal" propaganda efforts and nuclear weapons contracting. Gives lip service to "clean energy" by which they mean nuclear and coal.
Secretary of Agriculture. Works closely with trade and commerce to open foreign markets in Asia and Africa and Central America to U.S. exports.
Here are the rest. You'll get a much better idea of what Obama's policies will really be by looking at his choice of appointments to these posts, then you will by listening to any speech:
Secretary of Commerce.
Chairman of Federal Reserve.
Secretary of Housing and Human Development
Secretary of Homeland Security
Secretary of Health and Human Services (FDA)
EPA Administrator
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veteran's Affairs
National Intelligence Director
US Trade Representative
Director of National Drug Policy
Office of Management and Budget
For example, this was a record year for U.S. oversees weapons sales. Will that continue under an Obama Administration? Will our foreign policy continue to rotate around efforts to gain access to oil reserves? Will we see more undemocratic trade agreements like NAFTA? Will Obama pursue a NAFTA with Colombia, say? Will the FDA head be an ex-pharmaceutical CEO? (Buffet has huge investments in fossil fuels, both coal and oil, by the way - his appointment as head of Treasury would be a sure sign of the continuation of the status quo.)
Nobody knows much about any of this, because our godawful media didn't cover the core issues very well during this election. Everyone knows about Bill Ayers, but no one has any idea who Obama will pick as Secretary of Energy. If he picks a corporate insider linked to the fossil fuel or nuclear industry, then that will mean one thing. If he doesn't - say he picks the head of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory instead - then that will mean something else.
Wait and see...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That is the best "5" commentary I have seen in a long time..... good job.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Left out a lot...
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erik1968 on Nov 5, 2008 6:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seriously, ew. And Emahnuel is even worse. And LUGAR? Again, was Pat Buchanan too liberal?
I really was hoping to enjoy this for a few days. But in all seriousness, it's up to US to make sure this doesn't happen.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THERE ARE PROGRESSIVE VOICES IN THIS ADMINISTRATION!!
It's up to us! We got him elected after all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I am holding off my "told ya so" until after we have given him...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 5, 2008 6:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very Sincerely,
~Josephine Sixpack~
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oh, man, you were doing sooooo goood and then threw in Sarah Palin....
Posted by: Prophit
» But....
Posted by: ~Fiona~
» Oh, I agree, but she does not rate up there with the real destroyers and power brokers.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Oh, I agree, but she does not rate up there with the real destroyers and power brokers.
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Liberty G on Nov 5, 2008 6:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My pick for head of the EPA: Lincoln Chafee, the former moderate Republican Senator from my own state of RI. He is a statesman, intelligent, principled, honest, brave, and a passionate environmentalist, as was his father, Sen. John Chafee, before him.
Linc only lost his race to Sheldon Whitehouse (who has turned out to be another excellent legislator, by the way)because people in RI wanted so much to have a Democratic Congress.
Chafee is still a highly respected individual - and deserves it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How About A Protector of Our Environmental Life Support System?
Posted by: Hans B
» RE: How About A Protector of Our Environmental Life Support System?
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JakobFabian01 on Nov 5, 2008 6:50 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Democrats rule, you get bipartisan government. To the Democrats, bipartisanship means triangulation, that is, choosing the midpoint between the Republican position, no matter how insane, and the position of the Democratic Party's ideological base. This tradition, for better or for worse, accounts for Obama's unimpressive cabinet picks.
Two cheers for the return of two-party government!
But as several commenters have already said, real change is up to us. Let me suggest that part of our strategy should be proportional representation. Change the electoral system so that we can use instant-runoff voting and empower Greens and Libertarians to challenge the duopoly effectively. Then we'll have what most European countries have -- multi-party government and the possibility that in the future, mere bipartisanship will mean something other than gridlock -- what about a Dem-Green coalition?
In the longer term, I'd favor Constitutional reform to reduce the monarchical power of the Presidential veto and to give us a unicameral Congress -- one that represents populations, not land masses, as the House of Representatives does.
These are the structural reforms that we need. However we may curse and gnash our teeth at Democratic "cowardice," we have to realize that this is a structural as well as ideological problem.
Obama's victory (his victory over Hillary Clinton as well as that over McCain) is a sign that progressives have finally begun to loosen the ideological straitjacket of plutocracy that has heretofore held both of our major parties -- even though much more has to be done. Now, we should think about moving on to reform the plutocratic structure of our government. Obama's cautious centrism, like that of the Clintons before him, should be a reminder of the work that we have to do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eturn of Bipartisanship
Posted by: reelman
» Monopartisan: Exhibit A
Posted by: JakobFabian01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: covalentbonded on Nov 5, 2008 7:25 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Chinese (I think) said that one should be careful of what one asks for - one might get exactly that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Chinese also have a curse they use that may fit here....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Change? What change?
Posted by: Hans B
» RE: Change? What change?
Posted by: Sushi
» Time for whine is over
Posted by: nomomorons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ffrf.org on Nov 5, 2008 7:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vice President: Joseph Biden
Attorney General: Henry Waxman
Dept. Att. General: David Iglesias (Republican)
Fired Fmr. US Attorney, New Mexico
Secretary of State: Gov. Bill Richardson
Secretary of Defense: Franklin C. (Chuck) Spinney
Franklin C. "Chuck" Spinney is an American former military analyst for the Pentagon who became famous in the early 1980s for what became known as the "Spinney Report", criticizing what he described as the reckless pursuit of costly complex weapon systems by the Pentagon, with disregard to budgetary consequences. Despite attempts by the his superiors to bury the controversial report, it eventually was exposed during a United States Senate Budget Committee on Defense hearing, which though scheduled to go unnoticed, made the cover of Time Magazine March 7, 1983.
Sec. Commerce: Paul Krugman or Robert Reich, or, Amy Domini
Founder, CEO Domini Social Investments for direct support of communities.
Sec. Treasury: Alisa Gravitz
Alisa Gravitz is Executive Director of Co-op America—publisher of the National Green Pages, the authoritative guide to environmentally and socially responsible products and businesses. Alisa is one of the leading figures in the socially responsible investment movement—which has now grown to over $1.2 trillion, and a founder of the Green Festivals.
Sec. Agriculture: Russ Feingold
Sec. Education: Ruth Simmons
President of Brown University
Sec. Energy: Daniel M. Kammen
Alternative Energy guru and Berekley Professor of Energy and Resources, Chair of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory, and Professor of Public Policy, Distinguished Chair in Energy. Advisor for US and Swiss International Development, IPC working group III (UN)
Sec. of VA: Max Cleland
Sec. HHS: Howard Dean
Sec. HUD: Roxanne Qualls
Fmr. Mayor of Cincinnati, Urban development and transportation expert.
Sec. Interior: Wilma Mankiller
Wilma Mankiller, former Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, lives on the land which was allotted to her paternal grandfather, John Mankiller, just after Oklahoma became a state in 1907. Mankiller was the first female in modern history to lead a major Native American tribe. With an enrolled population of over 140,000, and an annual budget of more than $75 million, and more than 1,200 employees spread over 7,000 square miles, her task may have been equalled to that of a chief executive officer of a major corporation.
Sec. Labor: Alan B. Krueger
He has published widely on the economics of education, terrorism, labor demand, income distribution, social insurance, labor market regulation and environmental economics. Since 1987 he has held a joint appointment in the Economics Department and Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University. He is the founding Director of the Princeton University Survey Research Center and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research and of the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). He is the author of What Makes A Terrorist. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the Russell Sage Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, and the American Institutes for Research. He is a member of the editorial board of Science, and was editor of the Journal of Economic Perspectives from 1996 to 2002 and co-editor of the Journal of the European Economic Association from 2003-05. In 1994-95 he served as Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor.
Sec. Transportation: Hank Dittmar
Chief Executive of The Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Congress for the New Urbanism
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Some of these I don't know, but sound like they would be good.
Posted by: Prophit
» DOUBLE-CROSS OUT MANKILLER! RE: My Obama Administration
Posted by: sallyride
» RE: DOUBLE-CROSS OUT MANKILLER! RE: My Obama Administration
Posted by: ffrf.org
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tmwright on Nov 5, 2008 8:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a great NSC or DOD chief to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How about a spot for Wes Clark
Posted by: desertlakes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: desertlakes on Nov 5, 2008 8:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Gates had a role in illegal wiretapping, when he was in Reagan's white house. I do not see that he has a place in any open Government. Chuck Hagel has been more of a maverick than those who laid claim to the title. I'd like to see Naomi Klein and Antonia Juhacz in his cabinet. There are excellent people from Progressive think tanks that would do great jobs. We do not need to stick with AEI, Heritage, Cato, Brookings,etc. There policies didn't work. It's time for a true new world. President Roosevelts (Teddy and FDR) were Progressive. They did not use Hoover and McKinley's policies. They did not use their people.
President Bush put in so many mid level people on their ideology not their skills, that President Obama will have to take out and replace with skilled and thinking people. I can't wait to see who he puts in Agriculture (who is not pro Agri business but pro farmer), Energy, Interior. Our world is changing from the outside with Global Warming. We have such an opportunity!!!! I hope he puts the solar panels back on the White House that Jimmy Carter had on the White House, that Ronald Reagan took off.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Nov 5, 2008 8:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fervently hope all the ex- Clinton people are not going to comprise the new administration, which would be a real slap in the face. Here are some thoughts:
A Secretary of the Interior who actually cares about the environment and sustainable living, saving our Old Growth forests and Redwoods.
(Barbara Boxer?)
A Surgeon-General/Healthcare official who respects women's rights. opposes slaughterhouse cruelty to animals, etc. (Andrew Weil?)
The following should be considered:
Wesley Clark (Secretary of Defense?)
Dennis Kucinich (Secretary of the Interior)
Jim Webb
Chuck Hagel
Russ Feingold
Hillary Clinton (Attorney General?)
Any thoughts?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» HAGEL???? The father of the bogus voting machines for the repubs???/
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: HAGEL???? The father of the bogus voting machines for the repubs???/
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: nomomorons
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: marykane
» RE: Obama needs to think hard about appointees
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whipmeco on Nov 5, 2008 9:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rachel Maddow- Press Secretary
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please also include
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Please also include
Posted by: jugdish88
» RE: Please also include
Posted by: Quakermom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whipmeco on Nov 5, 2008 9:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not Emmanuel
Posted by: jareilly
» RE: Not Emmanuel
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 5, 2008 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But hey that's just me...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Except for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: xcept for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: TJColatrella
» RE: xcept for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: xcept for Dennis as AG or SEC chair, I agree with you.
Posted by: TJColatrella
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nomomorons on Nov 5, 2008 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've achieved some "mellow" after this election.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Given Obama's incredible--and verified--capacity
Posted by: 6399
» RE: Given Obama's incredible--and verified--capacity
Posted by: onevoter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 6399 on Nov 5, 2008 11:21 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I wonder who's going to be whispering in Obama's ear when Iran decides to go full speed ahead with that nucular weapons program? What do you think he'll be whispering? Sweet nothings?
ObamaBots, time to start writing those indignant letters you promised. Remember promising that you would hammer the Messiah when he made a poor decision? Well, he just did, so how 'bout it? Or does he get a pass because "he's the one"?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, lets recycle party insiders. Nothing like "Change we can believe in"
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Nov 5, 2008 11:26 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So here, Sam Stein, you start with speculating on which worn-out retreads, hacks and has-beens president-elect Obama should populate his cabinet with.
I mean, really now, if Obama's win represents a change, let it start with his cabinet picks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abuelo1 on Nov 5, 2008 12:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nobody more qualified for Secy of State
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: have we forgotten somebody?
Posted by: georgiaorwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avatar_singh on Nov 5, 2008 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Clinton was elected in 1992 BC was saying that it was worrisome for the british foreing office because Clinton might want peaceful settlement in Ireland. No worry. Within 3 weeks of Clinton eelction the british bastards brought him into their grip.. But the same B and british were very happy when in 1994 and 1996 this Clinton lost congress to conservative majority-proof that british friendship was only to neautralize Clinton from straying from so called neutral attitude to uk.
In fact in the 1988 American election B.B.C. had invited the chief drug dealer of BAT-i.e. british american tobacco-(who of course is an englishman) and there was another American there. During discussion of Ducassis' candidature the B.B.C. anchor man suggested to the American that the opponent of bush was hardly an American as he looked to dark and was Greek, the country of geek being too much near Africa. It really happened. This shows a few things. According to B.B.C. not only Blacks were not American but also all those who the english agents have labelled ethnic Americans. In fact B.B.C. openly said (in that program-usually B.B.C. does not reveal its evil intention so easily) that the American means actually anglo-saxons. The whole propaganda and racial slur was provided by BBC.
the way George H.W. Bush finished off Michael Dukakis in 1988. Lee Atwater, Bush’s smear manager, picked up Al Gore’s use of Horton – the black rapist furloughed for a weekend, under a law passed by Gov. Dukakis – and retooled it, throwing in slurs about Dukakis as being some foreign outsider
Don't confuse that white includes Germans either. The same English agents (in America) who created a monstrous film like ``birth of nation`` are the same people who crated prohibition only because many German immigrants were drinking bear and they did not like it. It is the same england sympathiser crowd who went on killing blacks, Irish,
etc -
now how come about that every President who wanted to take stand indendent of Britain in America on Domestic or Foreign has eithr been made impotent or killed(Abraham Lincoln, Kennedy,Robert Kennedy)?To understand that one has to remember British propaganda machinary(all sorts of media,BBB.,Papars, govt,etc) and britihs agents in America.Britain has always acted like a heyena(or dog) who let two or Three Lions(OF Europe like France, Germans
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulC on Nov 5, 2008 3:15 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pelosi is a coward who wants to minimize her own concept of risk. This conforms to her utter lack of leadership skills and complete lack of vision coming from a gross lack of understanding of the issues.
If Obama falls into this trap as well then we all lose big time - our chance to grab the brass ring of change will be lost forever.
Obama MUST show daring and vision in his selections - he MUST pick academics at the forefront of their field, as JFK did, new blood who project a sense of confidence and willingness to change.
How can a leader project leadership and vision by making dull, frightened, uninspired appointments?? It defies common sense.
The worst thing Obama could do is go Pelosi on us and become a walking zombie, one of the un-dead.
peace,
Paul
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: onevoter on Nov 5, 2008 6:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Treasury: Paul Krugman (Nobel Prize in Economics)
Attorney General: Laurence Tribe
Defense: Colin Powell
Health & Human Services: Dennis Kucinich
Communications Director: Rachel Maddow
Veteran's Affairs: Max Cleland
Interior: Ben Knighthorse Campbell
Surgeon General: Dr. Andrew Weil
Education: Me! ( a veteran teacher of 22 years)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Cabinet Picks
Posted by: georgiaorwell
» RE: Cabinet Picks
Posted by: reelman
» RE: Cabinet Picks
Posted by: onevoter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weslen1 on Nov 5, 2008 8:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then I'd make darn sure to get someone for Dept. of Defense who DOESN'T think it's a GOOD idea to sell NUKES to every other country on earth, and who thinks it's BETTER to PROTECT this country than to INVADE other countries for oil or any other reason.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sallyride on Nov 5, 2008 9:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go outdoors, and enjoy life - if you can stay awake - we're all suffering withdrawal symptoms, right now. This campaign has made a lot of us refined researchers and politicos, just to keep sane, and we need a 12-Step Program to recover from the abuse of these past months. It'll be hard enough to let-go, but lets-do, to be ready to volunteer in our own communities when we need to step up to help Obama.
I can't even add any posts to my blog!
Sorry but I only wanted to stop by, but had to open my mouth one more time. Night all!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» THE TIME OF PUNISH IS NEAR
Posted by: reelman
» RE: THE TIME OF PUNISH IS NEAR
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bemf on Nov 6, 2008 12:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.mediamouse.org/features/110608obama.php
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
MoveOn Launches Campaign for Bold Progressive Reforms as the Obama Era Begins
Obama's Promise of Change Comes Wrapped in Red, White and Blue
Reactions to Obama's Historic Moment From Around the Globe




