Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Election Day: Palin's Panic and the Right-Wing's Big Freak-out

AlterNet. Posted November 4, 2008.


National Review waiting for wheel to turn ... Michael Medved: Only national disaster will reverse Republican decline ...
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

7:00 PM PST

Over at the National Review, John J. Pitney Jr. had this doleful (and bizarrely nonsensical) response to the Democrats' rout:

As we look to the next 2-4 years, we should keep in mind this passage from Nikos Kazantzakis, The Last Temptation of Christ: "A prophet is the one who, when everyone else despairs hopes. And when everyone else hopes, he despairs. You'll ask me why. It's because he has mastered the Great Secret: that the Wheel turns.

Yep. Keeping waiting for that wheel to turn.

5:00 PM PST

According to conservative commentator Michael Medved, Republicans will regain power only if,

... some sense of international peril, some imminent and undeniable threat, forces the electorate to focus more on the fate of the country ...

Wishing for national disaster is a pretty strange way to show your love for America.

***

3:20 PM PST

Republicans and Fox news are still shamelessly trying to tap into anxieties over race. As Josh Marshall writes on Talking Points Memo:

It's hard for the GOP and Fox News to give up on whipping up fears that Obama is going to set up a black dictatorship in America where sundry pimps and gangbangers will replace the civil service and institute a reign of racial terror and compulsory miscegenation. Fox and the McCain campaign are pushing hard on this story of two men outside a polling place in Philly dressed in Black Panther garb. People affiliated with the McCain campaign showed up, to photograph or possibly provoke an incident. The police were called. One of the two guys was asked to leave; and he left. The other guys turned out to be an official poll watcher. That was probably the best resolution. As near as we can tell there's all sort of misinformation being disseminated about whites being prevented from voting, etc. We talked to an Obama campaign volunteer who saw the whole thing. And you can see her account here. This is just a kinder, gentler version of the Ashley Todd 'Carved B' mumbojumbo, another desperate Republican attempt to whip up racial hysteria to give them hope of winning the election.

***

2:20 PM PST

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) expressed his deep concern for the future of the country today, saying in so many words that a Democratic majority in Congress will destroy America. From Think Progress:

... Lieberman made clear that he firmly opposes Democrats gaining 60 seats in the Senate, saying that the survival of the country is in doubt if Democrats break the filibuster threshold:

BECK: But do you agree that Senator Hatch said to me that if we don't at least have the firewall of the filibuster in the Senate that in many ways America will not survive?

LIEBERMAN: Well, I hope it's not like that, but I fear.

***

1:50 PM PST

You can always count on right-wing talk radio shock jocks for subtle, complex political analysis informed by a deep understanding of history. Like the following commentary by right-wing talk show host Bill Cunningham (reported by Media Matters):

"Much like Castro took over Cuba, Mao Zedong took over Red China, and the Communists took over Russia, Obama now is poised, according to many of my good friends on the left like Paul Mason and others, to seize power in America, and I hope to be a bloodless coup.

You mean, like a majority of Americans going to the polls to cast their votes? Actually, that's called democracy.

Cunningham then somehow managed to top himself with the absurdity and offensiveness of his next statement:

[Obama] goes out to his left-wing buddies in San Francisco and smears God, smears guns, smears everything great about this country. Then he comes to these rallies like bromides, like Adolf Hitler in 1933, and the faithful are shouting, 'Yes we can, yes we can.'

***

1:30 PM PST


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: mccain, right-wing, election 2008, palin

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Reason 1002 to avoid the GOP
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 4, 2008 12:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it the Republicans only get country singers to support them? There are a thousand and one other reasons to not vote Republican, but the GOP's sole reliance on country music for inspiration is depressing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eason 1002 to avoid the GOP Posted by: aussidawg
» The country music solution Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» The new "white house" Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: dougo
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: mainspark
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: Malamute
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: The new "white house" Posted by: sirios
» Well, except that Hank Jr Posted by: Ambercat
» RE: eason 1002 to avoid the GOP Posted by: US Citizen
Right-wing Sophistry May Seem Like An Oxymoronic Term
Posted by: ranchero42 on Nov 4, 2008 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it really means the fascists are seeking a certain resonance with their base, especially when they can be seen to force the opposition to back down. Ironic, isn't it just, when these thugs demand to be treated the way they never have and never will treat people not just like themselves. Preemptive bargaining for special consideration. A more jaundiced world view could not or should not be possible. How like gods they are in their own self-apprehension. No wonder they fear "socialized medicine". The meds they fear most are the meds they need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin said this...?
Posted by: phillyfinest on Nov 4, 2008 2:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin said this: "What do they think? Do they think that the terrorists have all of a sudden become the good guys, and changed their minds? No! The terrorists still seek to destroy America and her allies and all that it is that is that we stand for: Freedom, tolerance, equality."

Since when does she stand for Freedom, tolerance, equality?

Last I checked, she wanted to take away freedoms (against pro-choice, for banning gay marriages...or anything coming close to gay marriage), she wasn't so tolerant of people who had other views (anti-Muslim, anti-Freedom of the Press) and, equality?, when's the last time you saw a person of color at one of her rallies?

Give it a break, Mrs. Palin. I can't wait to see you heading back to Alaska come later tonight.

--------------------------
Obama 2008
“Mad McCain” videos: http://tv1.com/playlists/show/11

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Palin said this...? Posted by: mainspark
Perhaps
Posted by: MizuInOz on Nov 4, 2008 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps Palin promotes psyco-babble political pandering praying Pentecostal platitudes promotes Palin 2012 political possibilities.

She is such a joke to her inner self. I bet her inner child is hiding in a dark corner of the basement and does not want to be made to come out to see the light of day... ever!

At least Joe Six Pack has a full compliment of beer to guzzle. I truly think she is working with only four cans of lite and two empty rings full of hot air!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did Palin issue an icy-cold threat to the media on SNL last night?
Posted by: Jasonix on Nov 4, 2008 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flipping the channels, I tuned into a brief portion of SNL's election spoof recap last night, and there was a short segment where Gov. Palin appeared, seemingly live, and in a tone of barely repressed rage, said she's suspend NBC's broadcast license in January. There didn't seem to be any hyperbole or comedic effect in her face or voice. Palin would, of course, claim it was all in good fun if she were questioned about it, but she sure didn't seem to be having a good time with it. I can't believe McCain would allow her to make comments like that, even in jest.

It seems like Queen Esther has become positively unhinged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» lorne Michels(sp?) Posted by: 113121
» RE: lorne Michels(sp?) Posted by: babs
» RE: RE: lorne Michels(sp?) Posted by: robert.noll
freedom is attractive and dangerous
Posted by: Suzon on Nov 4, 2008 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a democracy freedom is constrained on behalf of the common good.

In a monarchy, there is freedom for those who have no scruples about grabbing it. That kind of freedom is the freedom to lie, cheat, steal and even kill for your own advantage (Halliburton).

McCain and Palin will appeal to people whose life choices are very limited and who relish watching the dynamic of power-grabbing, lies and greed.

Obama is self-disciplined and thoughtful by contrast. So voters will be choosing between freedom constrained by principle and freedom to run amok.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, the First Amendment Rights only apply to Repubs
Posted by: paulaH on Nov 4, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where was the Replublican defense of First Amendment rights when the Dixie Chicks spoke out against them and their puppet? Oh, right. They were condemning them, not defending them. Yes, I see. If you're wit 'em it's good for God and country; when you're agin 'em, it's unpatriotic and treasonous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the voters need to stop this
Posted by: strange_trp on Nov 4, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this election has featured some ofthe most deceptive, name- calling, criticize him because all my plans suck, hate filled, racially polarizing, and frankly deeply disturbing to the working class American. we are sick of this garbage and it looks like congress are just as scared to put the campaign writers in check as they were to hold any serious investigation regarding the treasonous acts committed by bush and his administration.

ITS TIME TO STOP BEING NICE POLITE MARTYRS. Carter was the greatest president in my lifetime but he didnt know how to tell his opponents who were wrapped up in payoffs and towing the party line, to just do America a favor and f#@k off.

if obama would tell john mccain to just shut the hell up if he doesnt have the sense to leave a POW camp when he was set free- the press coverage was just too alluring- obama just needs to stand up when mccain lets one of his fear-mongoring lies out and call mccain out on it... well ya know john, while you were drinking champagne in the POW camp where you stayed just to get your face in the paper, I was enabling the toughtest neighborhoods in Chicago to organize themselves and recreate a community they could be proud of.

and john, while your wife was stealing schedule II and III controlled substances from a NON PROFIT foundation to support her junkie opiate addiction, I was working to raise the minimum wage so your wife's drug dealer has less incentive to get rich turning your wife's brain into oatmeal. Why did you oppose that minimum wage increase, john? do you like cinnimon and sugar in that oatmeal????

tell me john... you call me a terrorist. if that is true i guess you should describe to me how it feels to drop napalm on children with the bravery of being 50k feet in the air, safely out of range of defensive measures.... just incase my terrorist fraternity give me a pop quiz.... if they want to know if its hard to sleep knowing you burned innocent children alive from the outside in.....

tell me john.... you have so much to say about what you believe about me in that wilted brain of yours, twisted with dementia that you don't even know what you are talking about half the time.... you have so much to say about the horrible person i am.....

why don't you ever have anything good to say about yourself?????

because it doesn't exist.

the very fact that the mccain and palin actually are on the ballot is completley baffling. what happened to ron paul????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the voters need to stop this Posted by: SkeeterVT1
» RE: the voters need to stop this Posted by: lateenoMatt
Just deleted Hank Jr from my play list.
Posted by: SteveO on Nov 4, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be running the CD though the microwave when I get home.

I'm exercising my first amendment rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As long as they control the money and media rackets...
Posted by: archives@uwyo.edu on Nov 4, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as they control the money and media rackets...these battles with the crooks will offer nothing but temporary and minor victories. We have to destroy their rackets and kill their money supply line once and for all. Various socialisms are the only way I can think of to do it. There is absolutely no reason to allow our financial and media rackets to be controlled by private criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Force FoxNews to Change Its Name
Posted by: artifax on Nov 4, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really wonder if it's legal for publicly licensed airwaves to be used to promote an outlook so steadily slanted and still call itself "news;' like it offers some sort of real public service. Let's lobby to have them change their name to FoxViews and end the scam. They'll still have their free speech and the public will have a more honest picture of their offerings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re:You're quite right about the Hanks - Jr vs. Sr - but..
Posted by: blurider on Nov 4, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..Jr's version of 'Ramblin' Man' used to tug hard at my heartstrings!! Better than his Dad's version!

I say 'used to' because he's off my play list too.

I grew up with country - in the country - but my Mom encouraged my eclectic musical taste. Over the past few years I've come to view country as just more, cheap, shallow, popular music, about as 'country' or as 'western' as Pace salsa. All the depth of 'Barnacle Bill' or 'Mares eat Oats' In fact it seems very much, like the 'Republican heart' - cheap, shallow and only in it for the profits!

I've been aware for a while that redneck and Republican were synonymous and C&W says it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Harry
Posted by: camanida on Nov 4, 2008 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect that after the election Sarah Palin indeed will meet Hank Williams Jr. "on the other side of victory." That would be a drubbing.
Some have Junior, others have Hank - as the Dixie Chicks remind us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Another CW whore... Posted by: omatravel
Palin - What's Next ?
Posted by: reinaldok on Nov 4, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Obama's, resounding triumph, what will become of Sarah Palin? Will she become another William Miller (Goldwater's VP candidate), totally unknown 20 years after the failed election? Or will she become what some pundits like to call her a future "Mooseolini"? Unfortunately she will probably still be around pushing her ultra, ultra right wing fascist rubbish. Our only hope is that nobody will pay much attention to her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Palin - What's Next ? Posted by: omatravel
» RE: Palin - What's Next ? Posted by: shd1230
Just now CNN
Posted by: helenahanbasquet on Nov 4, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mentioned that when Sarah was asked how she voted she invoked her right to privacy and refused to answer the question.

I bet she went in there and wrote in herself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just now CNN Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian
» RE: Just now CNN Posted by: Beck
McCain should be "Censured by U.S. Senate for this Campaign and it's many slanders..!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 4, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain should be Censured by the United States Senate, for his behavior actions and many slanders unbecoming and befitting a United States Senator during a presidential campaign towards, another United States Senator and presidential candidate..!

Simple as that..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Employee Free Choice Act, EFCA, is undemocratic.
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist on Nov 4, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Employee Free Choice Act, EFCA, is undemocratic. I define democracy the way R.J. Rummel defines in it “Power Kills”, 2002, Transaction Publishers:

• those who hold power are elected in competitive elections with secret ballot

• and wide franchise (loosely understood as including at least two thirds)

• freedom of organization and from organization

• freedom of speech

• freedom of religion and from religion

• a constitutional framework of law which the government is subordinate and guarantee equal rights.

The principle of a democratic vote, election is that you cast your vote in secrete so that you are not at risk of being pressured either by your peers or your employer. Secondly the vote must be of a majority of the employees, not a minority. The EFCA violates these basic principles and should therefore not be allowed to come into law. However I am equally concerned with union busting practices of some employers, this should by law be discouraged.

If a portion of workers wish to hold a ballot to be union members it employers should be forbidden by law to punish or fire workers that promote the ballot, it contravenes the right in a democracy to organize and to voice your opinion freely, free speech.

I originally come from Sweden and was myself a union activist and part of our unions leadership and negotiation team. But in Sweden the Unions had gotten too much power, there were and in certain areas a total discrepancy of power between unions and small business owners. (Big corporations always manage regardless of unionization or non unionization). Before we had a change of government in Sweden you basically had to be a member of a union to be able to have any rights in the work place, it negated most basic right of a democracy of not being forced to organize. Even worse, once you joined a union you were forced to join the SocialDemocrat party, reform socialists, whether you liked it or not.

Unionization is a good thing but not if it is used for antidemocratic purposes as the EFCA act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A nation at war with itself
Posted by: hilaryuk on Nov 4, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if Obama manages to stop the Republicans stealing the election, America will still be a deeply divided nation. The Democrats would not accept a McCain victory (probably with good reason) and the Republicans will not accept an Obama victory. It seems from the outside that there is little common ground between the two Americas and I wonder if Obama will be given the space to govern. Clinton cerainly wasn't, and, given that Congress will probably have a Democrat majority, I wonder how the visceral hatred of Obama will manifest itself.

If he wins, Obama will immediately be faced with almost unsolvable dilemmas, but surely the problem of healing this breach between his own citizens will be the most fundamental.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's how I'd do it Posted by: Jasonix
Republicans and Small Businesses
Posted by: ProfAnarchy on Nov 4, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always get a huge kick out of the hilarious doublespeak when Republicans speak so highly of "Small Businesses".

To hear them speak you would think that they are the ones who are fighting against the Walmarts, Costco and Fortune 500's for the sake of the small businesses and Not trying to destroy govt support for the SBA, and NOT giving out no bid contracts to their cronies and NOT empowering the flight of capital from our shores.

Republicans CARE SOOO Much about Small Businesses... Are you kidding me?!! What BS!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real issue is the second amendment
Posted by: drp on Nov 4, 2008 11:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I subscribe pretty much to Obama's stands on social issues. And yes, the War on Drugs is really a civil war on black people.

However, "freedom of Choice" also includes the "Right to Keep and Bear Arms". Neither Obama nor the Democratic party have given sufficient assurances that " Reasonable Gun control " means anything but gradual prohibition.

So, I just voted for the other guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The "Real Issue"?!?!?!? Posted by: rgoalierob
» RE: The real issue is the second amendment Posted by: helenahanbasquet
WHERE SARAH'S MISSING "G" BELONGS
Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas on Nov 4, 2008 1:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time to add the "G" as McCain's desperate run is Palin"G" into the sunset.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin and the state of journalism today
Posted by: Jasonix on Nov 4, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For once, I actually agree with Sarah Palin about the state of journalism today. It's too bad that we have to sift through blogs because paid journalists won't do their job. If you really cared about the state of the profession, Sarah, or understood the current interplay between the blogs and television media, you should have done the following:

1. Given press conferences and answered serious questions.

2. Given an interview on the subject of your apparent religious beliefs, telling us what we should make of your anointing by Thomas Muthee, claims that you pal around with Mary Glazier and by extension the "apostles" of the New Apostolic Reformation, your take on "the end times," "transformationalism," Christian Zionism, and whether your style of governing would be influenced by Pentecostal prophecy, among other things. Kennedy did it as a Catholic, Carter did it as a Baptist, Romney was mulling doing it as a Mormon...why did you think that a Pentecostal should be able to dodge answering questions about how her faith would influence her policies? Given the associations your immediate spiritual advisers seem to have with folks like John Hagee, C. Peter Wagner and Rick Joyner, we have to assume the worst due to your silence - after all, you want to know our nuke codes.

3. Release your medical records.

4. Did I mention something about taking questions from reporters?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin? Stevens?
Posted by: sallyride on Nov 4, 2008 6:59 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's her entree into Congress, "my friends." Tomorrow she meets with "those friends" in VA.

Let's ignore her, completely - media "blackout" and just keep her watched. Maybe, once she's home, back on her meds, and sees those fabuous children around her, and that they need their home, schools, and life, she'll wake up. Let's just hope so - or at the very least, get herself back to school

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Palin? Stevens? Posted by: Lilly
You guys appall me, all of you there is no statute of limitations on murder!
Posted by: Nightstallion on Nov 5, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And George W Bush is a murdering asshole, lets get on with Impeaching the bastard or none of us are going to get any rest from me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race-Baiting Continues
Posted by: Lilly on Nov 5, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I looked at Michael Savage's website this morning (it is usually even more astonishing than Rush Limbaugh's) and, sure enough, his theme is "stoking racial fear".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would scan better :)
Posted by: begruntleed on Nov 5, 2008 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you made the first 'promotes' into 'promoting'. But lol anyway

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]