Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Three 'Red State' Senate Races That Could Change America

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted November 3, 2008.


Dems are riding a wave into Congress this election, and a few key victories in the South could make a huge difference for progressive causes.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If Barack Obama pulls off a widely-anticipated win on Tuesday, he'll take office with an enormous amount of political capital. As George W. Bush proclaimed in 2004, "elections matter." But while Obama will have a clear mandate for dismantling the policies of the Bush era, he'll also have to wrestle with a conservative movement that, while wounded, is far from dead.

Key to his ability to effect substantive change will be the composition of the Senate, where 60 votes are required to overcome filibusters on crucial pieces of legislation. If the Democrats hit that mark, it'll be a game-changer; the party's leadership would have no excuses for failing to enact a progressive agenda. That in itself would help the party's progressive base exercise real power for the first time in decades.

Democrats started this cycle with an advantage; 23 GOP seats are up for re-election versus 12 seats held by Dems. With George Bush's dismal approval ratings, the Democrats have long anticipated increasing their Senate majority -- now 51-49, including "independent Democrat" Joe Lieberman (CT) and Bernie Sanders (VT) -- by 5-6 seats. But with the financial meltdown weighing heavily on the Republican brand and a disciplined and impressive Obama organization on the ground, a 60-seat majority, while still a very long shot, is not beyond the realm of possibility.

In addition to several seats left open by Republican retirements -- and that of the recently-convicted Ted Stevens (AK) -- Democrats have real opportunities to pick up seats that seemed like stiff challenges a few short months ago, including those held by Norm Coleman (MN), Gordon Smith (OR) and John Sununu (NH).

But if the Obama campaign can fulfill its promise of turning out huge numbers of new voters -- young people, people of color, single women -- then it's possible that several seats that in a normal election would never be in play might also flip.

Three races in Southern "red" states are of particular interest: Jim Martin's run against Saxby Chambliss in Georgia; the battle between Mitch McConnell and Bruce Lunsford in Kentucky and Kay Hagan's challenge to Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina.

Kentucky

Among the most closely-watched races this Tuesday will be that pitting Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell against Bruce Lunsford, a former businessman and long-time player in Kentucky Democratic politics.Winning the seat that would be a sweet bit of revenge for the Democrats, after the GOP successfully targeted South Dakota Democrat Tom Daschle, then the party's leader, in 2004. Prior to that contest, Senate tradition dictated that the two major parties wouldn't challenge their opposition's leaders. When The Hill asked Charles Schumer (NY), leading the Democratic fight for the Senate, about targeting McConnell, he said, "The rules of etiquette were broken with Tom Daschle."

McConnell's pitch is that Lunsford, as a Senate newbie, wouldn't have the clout that McConnell, a 24-year veteran of the chamber as well as the GOP's leader, enjoys. "There are [even] plenty of Democrats who … understand this would be a horrible trade for the commonwealth, a massive step backward in clout and influence," McConnell told a crowd at a campaign stop this weekend. The Republican's argument got a last-minute boost when Bush's Department of Veterans' Affairs approved a $75 million project in Louisville on Friday -- a well-timed move for the campaign.

Lunsford, meanwhile, has hit McConnell hard on the economy -- a through-story for all three races. At a rally on Saturday, Lunsford said, "People want prosperity back…They want to know it's gonna be all right. They want some hope. They want to feel like their country has the potential to be what it's been in the past." Lunsford has criticized McConnell for his role in crafting the $700 billion Wall Street bailout passed by congress last month.

McConnell is known for his fundraising prowess; a 2006 investigative report by the Lexington Herald Leader found a "nexus between his actions and his donors' agendas. He pushes the government to help cigarette makers, Las Vegas casinos, the pharmaceutical industry, credit card lenders, coal mine owners and others." The report called McConnell's rise to the top of Congress "a testament to the power of money in modern politics." Marshall Whitman, a former aid to John McCain -- who battled McConnell over campaign finance reform -- said, "He's completely dogged in his pursuit of money. That's his great love, above everything else."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: martin, senate, election 2008, mcconnell, chambliss, dole, lunsford, hagan

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What we would give for hindsight!
Posted by: ehensleyky on Nov 3, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a registered Republican in southeast Kentucky, I planned to vote against McConnell the moment he appeared on TV to support the $700-$850 billion robbery of the taxpayers. (BTW, how do you account for the additional $150 billion; not million) between Henry Paulson's first demand and the bill actually passed?
Anyhow, Bruce Lunsford is a terrible choice. Kentuckians did not believe there was any chance whatsoever of unseating McConnell, so a self-financed loser was allowed to be the Democratic candidate. Would that we could have seen this coming! McConnel would lose for sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hagin for Senate
Posted by: robchapman on Nov 3, 2008 4:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Kentucky and Georgia, the Democratic candidates are fairly weak, so it is hard to make a positive argument in favor of changing party seats.

But in North Carolina, the challenger Kay Hagin is clearly the more qualified person running. As a NC state senator, Ms. Hagin has beaten the old boy network and risen to a position of authority and power.

She has risen in the old-fashioned, she EARNED her position. Kay Hagin has shown the smarts, the toughness and the preparedness to rise to the top of the NC Senate appropriations committee where she makes the tough calls in allocating state resources.

Kay Hagin has shown the ability to make the right decisions in the allocation of NC governemt resources.

She is in the prime age to make a similarly significant impact in Washington, D.C.

Tarheels, vote for a better future, put Hagin into the US Senate.

Robert Chapman

A Tarheel bred and when I die, I'll be a Tarheel dead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pinkpatriot7
Posted by: trudi on Nov 3, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a Kentuckian who knows Bruce very well. This is a self-made man who came from a tobacco farm without indoor plumbing, worked hard to put himself through school, and hit the ground running in the business world. His insight and acumen are astonishing, and Kentucky will benefit greatly from his gifts. Bruce will work for the people of Kentucky - not the special interests, like McConnell. I knew him when he owned Vencor, and thought it was an amazing idea to have a long term care facility for ventilator-dependent patients (my background being in Physical Therapy). Ultimately, the business failed, but that was because of the Balanced Budget Act passed by Clinton - and the whole medical industry took a huge hit due to decreased Medicare reimbursements. We took a chance on another multi-millionaire businessman who wanted to give back to his fellow citizens, and he became the shining star of the freshman class in Congress - John Yarmuth. Both he and Bruce feel that "to whom much is given, much is expected". It's time we gave a man with the Midas Touch a chance at taking the Senatorial baton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Losing Dole
Posted by: aftercancer on Nov 3, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Dole loses tomorrow I think it will be due to her lack of respect for North Carolinians. She has spent virtually no time in the state, something crazy like 35 days over the past two years. The final cut? The ads accusing her opponent of not being Christian. Offensive on so many levels. Clearly an act of desperation. Let's hope the whole state is blue tomorrow night! http://aftercancernowwhat.wordpress.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oregon
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 3, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not surprised Gordon Smith is in trouble: Oregon is now a very "blue" state. Smith is the only Republican in statewide office; Democrats control the Legislature, and 4 out of 5 Congressional districts. I was a little surprised that Gordy even ran again, given the trouble the Republicans are in.

We don't see any Presidential campaign ads to speak of, but the TV is wall-to-wall Senate ads. It's pretty funny, watching Smith try to pretend he's really a Democrat. Merkley, his opponent, is not terribly impressive, but he is anti-free-trade (or so he says) and the Greens don't have anyone in that race, so I'll be voting for him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oregon Posted by: Chloe2005
» RE: Oregon Posted by: Noya
From Kentucky...
Posted by: CatDad on Nov 3, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like slimeball McConnell will make it yet again. It's a tragedy that such a dignified state has two of the absolute worst Senators: McConnell and and Bunning.....Kentucky provides a case study in how the American Right has been able to transform a traditional Democratic state into a "Nixonland" Red State...voters outside of Louisville are simply too distracted with the bogus moral, character assassination and "they'll confiscate your guns" issues/threats that the GOP throws at them...It doesn't really help that the Democratic candidate is a multi-millionaire corporate CEO who made his millions off of the private health care market...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's the cold reality. CALL NUSH AND TELL THEM NOT TO STEAL THE ELECTION
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
202 456 1111
That's the nightmare. Here's the cold reality.

Swing state Colorado. Before this election, two Republican secretaries of state purged 19.4 percent of the entire voter roll. One in five voters. Pfft!

Swing state New Mexico. One in nine voters in this year's Democratic caucus found their names missing from the state-provided voter registries. And not just any voters. County by county, the number of voters disappeared was in direct proportion to the nonwhite population. Gore won the state by 366 votes; Kerry lost it by only 5,900. Despite reassurances that all has been fixed for Tuesday, Democrats lost from the list in February told me they're still "disappeared" from the lists this week.

Swing state Indiana. In this year's primary, ten nuns were turned away from the polls because of the state's new voter ID law. They had drivers' licenses, but being in their 80s and 90s, they'd let their licenses expire. Cute. But what isn't cute is this: 566,000 registered voters in that state don't have the ID required to vote. Most are racial minorities, the very elderly and first-time voters; that is, Obama voters. Twenty-three other states have new, vote-snatching ID requirements.

Swing state Florida. Despite a lawsuit battle waged by the Brennan Center for Justice, the state's Republican apparatchiks are attempting to block the votes of 85,000 new registrants, forcing them to pass through a new "verification" process. Funny thing: verification applies only to those who signed up in voter drives (mostly black), but not to voters registering at motor vehicle offices (mostly white).



Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.

This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.

That's what I found while traveling the nation over the last year for BBC Television and Rolling Stone Magazine, working with voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This we guarantee: there will be far more votes disappeared by Tuesday night than the three million lost in 2004. A six-million vote swipe, quite likely, shifts 4 percent of the ballots, within the margin of error of the tightest polls.

Begin with this harsh statistic: since the last election, more than ten million voters have been purged from the nation's vote registries. And that's just the start of the steal.

If the noncount were random, it wouldn't matter. But it's not random. A US Civil Rights Commission analysis shows that the chance a black voter's ballot will "spoil" or be blank is 900 percent higher than a white voter's.

Does that mean the election's stolen and you should forget voting and just go back to bed for four years? Hell, no. It means you vote and vote smart, learn how to pry their filthy little hands off your ballot (there's a link at the end).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Greg Palast? Posted by: jon B
866-OUR-VOTE/888-VE-Y-VOTE h
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
866-OUR-VOTE/888-VE-Y-VOTE h
Mon, 11/03/2008 - 21:05 — Anonymous (not verified)
866-OUR-VOTE/888-VE-Y-VOTE http://www.866ourvote.com Please publicize this number - volunteers are standing by there to give information, help clarify election laws and empower voters to vindicate their rights, and in some cases, to send mobile field units directly to the polls or to contact election officials to address problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Checks & Balances already upset with majority
Posted by: pacer on Nov 3, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Help to make sure that those who put others first are always taken care of and their sacrifices are never forgotten.” – Please show your support for us veterans before Veterans Day and vote McCain.

And fellow veterans’ have you also been walking down that lonely street of dreams? Well it is time to stop hanging on to the promises of yesterday, and walk alongside John McCain in bipartisan unity.

While a good president knows there would be no United States without veterans he would-not rightly put veterans in front of our Country (what true veteran would even want that?). Veterans barely survived these last thirty years and our funding has finally been getting on the right track, and with no thanks to this congress for adding billions in back door pork, earmarks and/or amnesty for illegal’s etc…As President McCain will stop this waste and has stated the VA will be properly funded. Yes, for once with President McCain it will be!

All our active duty military deserve the best Commander In Chief and veterans also deserve the best. McCain knows were he’s been and knows the way our country must go…

Whitesnake performing: Here I Go Again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKTiwCez6Zs

WE HAVE NO MORE TIME TO WASTE VOTE MCCAIN
Here I Go Again

I don't know where I'm goin
but I sure know where I've been
hanging on the promises in songs of yesterday.
An' I've made up my mind, I ain't wasting no more time
but here I go again, here I go again.

Tho' I keep searching for an answer
I never seem to find what I'm looking for.
Oh Lord, I pray you give me strength to carry on
'cos I know what it means to walk along the lonely street of dreams.

Here I go again on my own
goin' down the only road I've ever known.
Like a drifter I was born to walk alone.
An' I've made up my mind, I ain't wasting no more time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THERE IS SOMETHING ROTTEN IN AMERICAN AND IT IS THE REPUBLICANS
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current legal action will obviously not be resolved in time to determine the possible extent of any effort to manipulate electronic voting in 2008. But poll workers, campaign activists and local supporters of Senator Obama can do a number of practical things in order to identify and compile evidence of anomalies which may signal digital manipulation of election returns:

1. Local activists and lawyers in any state where the vote appears close should demand that county voting officials where electronic voting systems are used should, if possible, unplug their servers from the Internet and phone in their results, and otherwise never permit external IT consultants to have unsupervised physical access to hard drives after vote counting commences.

2. Screen captures of all television-reported exit poll numbers on all networks should be obtained for every state for which they are reported, to later compare them to actual vote tallies when they are reported - and the networks should assign a staff person to perform such checks. Any significant deviations from statewide exit polls in counties that don't have demographic factors to account for such differences should be flagged for later investigation.

3. Vote totals for presidential and down-ballot candidates should be compared, precinct-by-precinct and county-by-county, to see if there are strange disparities. In 2004, a Democratic candidate for a judgeship in Ohio mysteriously received tens of thousands more votes than John Kerry (even though many voters never bother to vote for down-ballot candidates). This was a statistical improbability of enormous magnitude (no disrespect meant to the judge).

4. Vote totals in safe Republican counties should be compared to the past two election cycles, to see whether any sky-high turnout is historically unprecedented and therefore cause for suspicion. That is what happened in several Republican-dominated counties in Florida in 2004. Election monitors should also watch the traffic at the polling places in Republican precincts, and maintain careful records, as a way to gauge the honesty of later claims about the turnout there.

These steps are necessary to facilitate the discovery of any circumstantial or direct evidence of possible manipulation of electronic-voting returns, which would be sufficient to enable immediate legal action to prevent certification of election results. In turn, that would permit time for a full forensic investigation. Additionally, many citizens' groups are preparing calls to action should legal remedies to any attempted vote interference falter or be obstructed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If they take waway our right to vote we're as good as slaves.
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 6:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what we call election fraud. This means using the computerized voting systems which we now have in place in at least 80% of the country. Precisely because it is so technical and it's so opaque and it's all run by private companies, private companies that have close ties to the Republican Party, the use of this kind of voting apparatus is extremely worrisome and something that we should be watching very carefully.

We're talking here about a fundamental right, no, about the fundamental right. This is the right on which all our other rights depend, as Tom Paine said. Nothing is more important than this right. This is the right for which millions of our forebears have shed their blood, have died. This is what keeps us free. Only this. If we lose the right to pick our representatives and to get rid of the government when we don't like it anymore, if we don't have that right, if we don't have that power, we're as good as slaves.
MARK CRISPIN MILLER: is a Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]