Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Now It's Clear Why Some People Are Scared of Early Voting: Because It Empowers People

By Pam Kapoor, AlterNet. Posted November 2, 2008.


Vote Today Ohio shows that you can bring marginalized people to vote early, and really challenge the powers that be.
Advertisement

"I've thought of more excuses why not to vote, why not to do this," Bobby told us. "And each time, it has cost me more than it would have cost me to get up off my a** -- excuse my French -- and try to make a change."

So said Bobby Johnson in the back of one of our Vote Today Ohio shuttles. When he spotted our van at the Bishop Cosgrove Centre, a food pantry in Cleveland, he climbed right on in. He hadn't voted in years, but on October 4th, 2008, Bobby became one of the 67,408 Ohioans who cast a ballot during the first week of Ohio's new Early Voting period.

We have seen and heard Bobby's story repeated from Cincinnati to Youngstown, from Athens to Toledo. So many unlikely voters we drove to Ohio Early Voting Centers represent this truth: elections are changing. You might even say democracy itself, in fact, is changing. For the better.

Ohio no longer has an Election Day. Innovative updating of the process has now yielded an Election Month. And we've seen the embracing of this change in the faces of the very voters most positively impacted by it.

This year, an estimated 1 out of 3 Americans will cast their ballot either through absentee or early voting. Colorado is even expected to see half its turnout amongst early voters. Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner opened Early Voting Centers in every county on September 30 and will keep them open through November 3. She has gone openly and vehemently on the record as supporting Early Voting as a means of broadening access, and estimates that "25 percent of Ohio's registered voters, or the number of voters voting, will have voted before Election Day."

Um, so what?

Political operatives will need awhile to figure out just how Early Voting will alter the longstanding rules of campaigning. But everyone -- even armchair observers -- recognizes the impact early voters could have on overall election results. Consider that after all the counts were recounted, Bush took Ohio in 2004 by roughly 100,000 votes (and squeaked in Florida by a mere 527 votes). Campaigners on either side of the spectrum see the value of locking in those sorts of numbers within the early voting window. Every vote sizzles with relevance: the 3300 voters we (Vote Today Ohio) transported represent far more than a drop in the bucket. Of the 9264 people who this year voted during Golden Week in Franklin County (home to Columbus), we moved 1369 of them -- that's 14.8 percent of the early vote in Franklin County. It's safe to assume that hundreds of thousands of Ohioans have learned about early voting directly from our work. That's powerful.

After having spent the last four weeks helping Ohioans take advantage of the early voting scheme, we are even more convinced that early voting enhances democracy. It allows more people to vote -- plain and simple. Most Americans take voting seriously, but it's not like Election Day is a national holiday. Oh no -- voters are expected to tuck the task of ballot casting in between work and school and commuting and all the realities of modern life. Never mind the notorious polling center line-ups and moody machines that Ohioans know all too well, or GOP intimidation (the Huffington Post recently reported that Republicans intend to place 3,600 paid recruits inside Ohio polling places on Election Day to challenge the qualifications of certain voters).

Our vans have transported all manner of Ohioans -- of Bobby Johnsons -- who are unlikely to have voted otherwise. Nick drove an elderly Dayton man to vote early who figured his absentee ballot would be lost at the housing project where he lives. Caty drove Columbus college students who were too excited to wait until November 4. Erik drove a transient Cincinnati woman who for forty years, has abstained from elections, thinking her vote didn't matter. Rafiq has driven countless young Cleveland men who most people fear or overlook as part of the urban scenery.

Moving nearly 3500 Ohioans to Early Voting Centers has helped us understand all too well why opponents would devote precious time and resources to convincing the public that early voting is trouble: because it helps bring marginalized people in from the margins. And that must threaten them to the bone. Challenging democracy, indeed.

Vote Today Ohio is eagerly calling any and all volunteers to help with the final push.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ohio, election 2008, early voting

Pam Kapoor is the Media Director of Vote Today Ohio.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
encouraging early voting before the fear clears your brain
Posted by: planet doomed on Nov 2, 2008 1:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is what the Dems are frantically trying to do right now. They know once that vote is cast, it can't be undone. Liberals are right now where the repubs were 7 years ago, terrified of the future and falling for the scam of a professional charmer.

Breath. The future will be fine. You will be ok. You do not need snake oil to survive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hilarious Post Posted by: LeaderofMen
You make time for what you value
Posted by: BeckyD on Nov 2, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
voters are expected to tuck the task of ballot casting in between work and school and commuting and all the realities of modern life

Yes, they are. Because you make time for what's important to you, and reading the quote of the man you used to illustrate how great this early voting is, obviously he didn't value his franchise, because people who value their vote don't make excuses not to vote - they just do it.

We tuck many things in between work and school and commuting - returning movies to Blockbuster, shopping, sitting on the couch watching endless reality shows. Election day is not a surprise - we know it's coming and can plan for it.

People who have genuine reasons why they can't make it to the polling place on election day can vote absentee, but I believe there is great value in all of us (or as many of us as possible) voting on the same day from the same frame of reference, with the same information.

For those of us who are female or African-American, our ancestors fought hard to get us the right to vote - it's sad that we can't bestir ourselves enough to get off the couch on election day and honor their memories and legacy by doing our civic duty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

clearly a threat
Posted by: kiel on Nov 2, 2008 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I overheard a couple of old women talking about the election during a kids' Halloween parade last Friday, after a kid walked by in a McCain costume (to a wide smattering of applause).

"I sure hope he wins," said one.

"Me, too." said the other. "But it doesn't look good. I can't believe people would vote for..well..someone like that Obama."

"Oh, me neither," responded the first." "I never thought I'd see the day...."

"Oh, I know," agreed the second. "And that early voting is such a scam. It's just a scam."

"It sure is," agreed the first.

It was very clear where these old white women stood (all they were missing were their hoods), and why they were so threatened by people taking part in the democratic process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Early voting
Posted by: frank69 on Nov 2, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I voted weeks ago. I am a permanent absentee voter here in California. Of course, as a thinking patriot, I voted Obama-Biden.

FYI: I'm a 70 year old veteran of 28 years active duty in the US Air Force. I am a life long Democrat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Absentee voting Posted by: kellysgarden
Realities of Modern Life
Posted by: CaptainDad on Nov 2, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank God for early voting! My daughter and I voted early, and if not for the opportunity to vote early I might not have been able to do so.

I work nights, and next Tuesday I would have had to get up early after a 12-hour shift and stand in line for who knows how long before going to work for another 12 hours. Very possibly, I would have had to leave in order to be at work on time.

Listen carefully when others call early voting a scam. Somewhere in there, you will learn that their real fear is WHO is voting and WHO they are voting for.

Early voting has effectively enfranchised thousands. Voter Vans serve anyone who needs help, without regard to party affiliation.

This is democracy in the best sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jim Crow is alive and well
Posted by: drdanj on Nov 2, 2008 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm actually surprised at this turn of events, especially in Ohio. It is no accident that rich white polling places are open on time, the machines work, they have a higher proportion of booths per person. Poor, minority districts get broken machines, few staff, and somehow always just wind up with long lines, hours of wait. You may not even get a chance to vote because the polls close. That is not an accident. Anything that helps bring the franchise back to voters is a great thing. One writer essentially blames people for not being willing to stand in line to vote. Focusing on the individual, and blaming the individual, we overlook systems designed to beat the individual down. The same racism as Jim Crow, poll taxes and all is still in place, just more subtle, just has a kinder gentler face, but it is still the face of tools designed to disenfranchise people. The article's author also overlooks the issue of disenfranchisement, taking people off voting rolls. The more times it is said that Bush won Florida by 537 votes, the more it will go down in history as truth. The more times that is said, the more the issue of "hanging chads" becomes the historical problem of 2000. This is promotion of a lie. Hanging chads were not the primary problem. Illegally, un-Constitutionally kicking people off voting rolls was the TRUE story of 2000. Let us stop going along with the lie. The 2000 election was stolen before the first vote was cast. And, the Democrats folded and went along with it. Gore gaveled down the African-American and other legislators who tried to get an investigation. I want to know why. Those parts of the story are being erased from our collective memory. Why?

Daniel Jordan, PhD

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jim Crow is alive and well Posted by: motamanx6
» RE: Jim Crow is alive and well Posted by: sureshot45
» RE: Jim Crow is alive and well Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: Jim Crow is alive and well Posted by: Squarehead
Scarier than halloween
Posted by: truthfinder on Nov 2, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We shall see how many racist warmongers America has on Nov. 4. As for the GOP paid recruits at Ohio polls, they should be tried for harassment and obstruction of elections, both federal offenses. What's scarier than Halloween? Three words. President Sarah Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scarier than halloween Posted by: hilaryuk
CHANEY'S ENDORSEMENT OF MCCIAN WAS BOLD AND AGGRESSIVE
Posted by: cori on Nov 2, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chaney's bold endorsement of McCain right before the election should be a warning to all those who want a fair election. After McCain spent his entire campaign distancing himself from Bush and Chaney, Chaney told us the he, the power behind Bush, endorses McCain. So watch out. They aim to steal this election too and this was what Chaney was telling us.
Mark Crispin Miller is a media critic who's been focused on voter problems and election fraud in this country. He's a professor at New York University, author of several books. Most recently he edited Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008. His previous book, Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election and Why They'll Steal the Next One Too.
Voter fraud-I want to repeat this-is virtually nonexistent. There have been several academic studies of this notion of whether individuals actually stuffed ballot boxes or show up at polling places pretending to be somebody else. There's actually not a single known case of any such type of voter fraud being prosecuted by the Department of Justice. And yet, that notion of voter fraud is used as the pretext for taking steps that do demonstrably result in tens of thousands of people being unable to vote, you see? It's a really masterful strategy. And I only wish that the Democratic Party had all this time been aggressive in pointing out that the Republicans are the party engaged in disenfranchisement.
Specifically, he has named a man named Mike Connell. Mike Connell, according to Spoonamore, is Karl Rove's computer guru. This is the guy who has helped Bush-Cheney fix election results through computers since Florida 2000, in Ohio in 2004, also in the stolen re-election of Governor Don Siegelman in Alabama in 2002, also in the stolen re-election of Senator Max Cleland in Georgia in 2002.
So don't mail in an absentee ballot and if you punch in Obama and it says McCain, go to the supervisor and demand that you want your vote corrected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough of their votes will be flipped by electronic voting devices
Posted by: Zeugitai on Nov 2, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to render it all futile. That's what happened in Ohio in 2004, and they have only bought more Diebold fraud machines since then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ambivalent on early voting. Sure, there's something to be said...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 2, 2008 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for making voting as convenient as possible. There's also an argument for having a uniformly informed (ha-ha) electorate turning out on a national day of elections.

Sigh. So long as it doesn't break down into a "Vote early! Vote often!" affair, the decision to vote early, and by what process is best left where it's at: up to the States. If Ohio likes it, that's great for Ohio.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only reason the Republics don't like early voting is because
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 2, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the people that have taken advantage of early voting this year are overwhelmingly Obama supporters.

This nation desperately needs ELECTORAL REFORM from the bottom to the top. We need to have ONE set of rules for all Federal Elections. Period. No more "state's rights" bullshit arguement! One set of rules for all 50 states in all Federal Elections! It's the ONLY thing that makes sense and to keep these bastards from disenfranchising even one person who has the right to vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voting
Posted by: Archie1954 on Nov 2, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracy is the business of every American personally and of society as a whole. Therefore why not pass a law as in many other democracies such as Canada, for instance, that on election day all businesses are expected to allow their workers to have two hours of working time to vote at no loss of pay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National electoral roll
Posted by: phindrup on Nov 2, 2008 6:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However the election goes, what US citizens ought to be setting up is something along the lines of the Australian system.
There is an electoral commission, run by professional public servants. Everybody of voting age must be registered on the electoral roll. That same roll is used for all elections — local councils, state and federal.
Neither politicians nor party members are allowed near — I think it is within 200 yards — of a polling booth except as an individual, to cast a ballot.
It is an offence to attempt to prevent anybody casting a vote.
In a state election, any resident of that state can vote from any polling booth within that state, in a federal election from any polling booth in the country.

Residents are registered as living in a specific electorate, and their vote counts in that electorate no matter what polling booth they vote at.

The booths are staffed by people paid by the Electoral commission. The counting of votes is done by people paid by the electoral commission. Candidates are permitted to appoint a scrutineer, — perhaps more than one per booth, but limited, and the Electoral Commission person in charge can have them removed at any time. The scrutineers are not permitted to touch a ballot paper.

When I ran for a local council I asked a person I knew well if he would scrutineer for me, — he replied: “ peter, I will not vote for you, but yes, I will scrutineer for you”.
Yes, of course I accepted. A ‘good’ scrutineer is there to see that the vote is accurate — not to try and gain advantage for their candidate.

Of course such a system requires careful setting up. It must be staffed by ‘permanent staff public servants, politicians or political parties must not be able to have any influence over who is appointed to the job — anybody in your case would include up to, and including the president!

In my view The US needs to get rid of the notion of registering people as democrats or republicans. If everybody of voting age is simply required to be on the electoral roll, at least part of your problems are over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: National electoral roll Posted by: Quannah
Challenged Patsies & Lemmings
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Nov 2, 2008 10:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"really challenge the powers that be"...

Really?

You mean like the monopoly corporate crime "powers that be" that bought the election for crooked old McClown and his faux opponent Obama that fully supports the genocide of phony 9/11 "war on terror" FISA spy state and personally pressured every democrat (a.k.a. republicrat) on the hill to rig their final votes in favor of martial law blackmail Wall Street "bailout"?

Those "powers that be"?

I think NOT.

If the choice is between dirty and slightly dirtier I think we all know where that leaves America under this red herring election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's the cold reality. CALL BUSH AND TELL THEM NOT TO STEAL THE ELECTION
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
202 456 1111
That's the nightmare. Here's the cold reality.

Swing state Colorado. Before this election, two Republican secretaries of state purged 19.4 percent of the entire voter roll. One in five voters. Pfft!

Swing state New Mexico. One in nine voters in this year's Democratic caucus found their names missing from the state-provided voter registries. And not just any voters. County by county, the number of voters disappeared was in direct proportion to the nonwhite population. Gore won the state by 366 votes; Kerry lost it by only 5,900. Despite reassurances that all has been fixed for Tuesday, Democrats lost from the list in February told me they're still "disappeared" from the lists this week.

Swing state Indiana. In this year's primary, ten nuns were turned away from the polls because of the state's new voter ID law. They had drivers' licenses, but being in their 80s and 90s, they'd let their licenses expire. Cute. But what isn't cute is this: 566,000 registered voters in that state don't have the ID required to vote. Most are racial minorities, the very elderly and first-time voters; that is, Obama voters. Twenty-three other states have new, vote-snatching ID requirements.

Swing state Florida. Despite a lawsuit battle waged by the Brennan Center for Justice, the state's Republican apparatchiks are attempting to block the votes of 85,000 new registrants, forcing them to pass through a new "verification" process. Funny thing: verification applies only to those who signed up in voter drives (mostly black), but not to voters registering at motor vehicle offices (mostly white).



Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.

This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.

That's what I found while traveling the nation over the last year for BBC Television and Rolling Stone Magazine, working with voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This we guarantee: there will be far more votes disappeared by Tuesday night than the three million lost in 2004. A six-million vote swipe, quite likely, shifts 4 percent of the ballots, within the margin of error of the tightest polls.

Begin with this harsh statistic: since the last election, more than ten million voters have been purged from the nation's vote registries. And that's just the start of the steal.

If the noncount were random, it wouldn't matter. But it's not random. A US Civil Rights Commission analysis shows that the chance a black voter's ballot will "spoil" or be blank is 900 percent higher than a white voter's.

Does that mean the election's stolen and you should forget voting and just go back to bed for four years? Hell, no. It means you vote and vote smart, learn how to pry their filthy little hands off your ballot (there's a link at the end). from Greg Palast and Robert Kennedy Jr

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STAND UP FOR YOUR VOTE, ITS ALL WE HAVE LEFT
Posted by: cori on Nov 3, 2008 5:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we are on the doorstep of another US Presidential Election. If John McCain is declared the winner, everyone who voted should hit the streets and protest. It's that simple. The vote will have been manipulated because all polling up to now suggests Obama will win. And evidence exists already of vote flipping by the electronic machines. Vote flipping, voter intimidation, excessive challenges, voter purging, insufficient equipment (foreshadowed by the MSM TODAY!), secret certifications, inaccurate polling site location information. All these violations have been documented in the past 4 years and there's no reason to believe they won't be an issue this very week. STAND UP FOR YOUR VOTE, PEOPLE. And may God help us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]