Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

How This Election Could Change the Meaning of Masculinity in America

By Rob Okun, Women's eNews. Posted November 3, 2008.


Polls show people are no longer buying into the bullying tactics of old-school masculinity.
womensenewslogo
For more Women's eNews, visit, www.womensenews.org. To subscribe to Women's eNews, the daily news service for all women, go to www.womenenews.org/join.cfm.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


In the waning days of the presidential campaign, Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain are the leads in a gripping national drama about masculinity and Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin are nominees for best supporting actors.

Sen. McCain has replaced George Bush as the standard bearer for conventional manhood -- stubborn, controlling, shoot-from-the-hip, inflexible. From his sneering angry attacks on Sen. Obama's character to his Marlboro Man response to the perilous financial calamity, John Wayne (and Richard Nixon) would be proud. While his handlers spin his behavior as a sign of decisive, manly leadership, his campaign has devolved to the point former Secretary of State Colin Powell crossed party lines to endorse Sen. Obama. Neither on Main Street, nor on Wall Street, polls indicate, are people buying the Republican ticket's bullying tactics (which McCain briefly curtailed, only to resume with zeals). No cross dresser, Gov. Palin, meanwhile, is behaving in a way that would make that bastion of masculine behavior, the late Charlton Heston, proud indeed. Sen. Obama, who has been described in scores of newspaper editorial endorsements as sensitive, thoughtful, composed, and collaborative, reflects a gentler brand of masculinity. Polls suggest his "let's stay calm" approach to the financial crisis -- and in general -- is playing much better with voters than the McCain-Palin fear-mongering. While "It's the masculinity, stupid" is unlikely to become a last minute campaign theme, manhood is a subtext in the campaign. Consider how a less strident brand of American masculinity as practiced by an Obama-Biden administration would contribute to polishing our tarnished reputation internationally.

Obama has resisted supporters' calls to find his "killer instinct" and "go for the jugular." They miss the point. Obama really does want to do things differently. He understands that old school manhood translates into old style politics and visa versa. Whatever legitimate criticisms can be made about some of Obama's positions, his conduct signals an effort to expand the definition of masculinity away from suspicion and isolation and toward trust and collaboration. For growing numbers of voters, being willing to talk with our enemies (now central to the Bush administration's diplomatic strategy) is seen not as a naïve flaw but as a quiet strength.

As gender's role as a force in the campaign has unfolded, a new political reality has emerged: "kinder, gentler" expressions of masculinity are being viewed positively. Mean-spirited representations, as evidenced by Gov. Palin's snarly attacks, rather than attracting Hillary Clinton's supporters, aren't getting much traction. Among the electorate those most excited about her candidacy -- portraying Dick Cheney in a dress -- are Tina Fey and her writers at "Saturday Night Live."

By contrast, remember Sen. Biden's emotional moment at his debate against Gov. Palin? There was a time (think Sen. Edmund Muskie crying in New Hampshire 40 years ago) when a display of such feeling by a man would have been seen as a game-changing moment of weakness. Biden's moment only made him seem more human and, when commented on at all, elicited a positive response. Clearly, ideas about manhood are changing. It's about time. (In case you've forgotten, the Delaware senator choked up for a moment while recalling his life as a single father 35 years ago in the aftermath of his wife and baby daughter dying in an automobile accident that also seriously injured his two young sons). Notably, Gov. Palin didn't acknowledge Biden's tender moment. How old school male. Imagine what the response would have been if the roles had been reversed?

All of the vital issues facing the nation -- from civil liberties to global warming, from finding a way out of the financial morass to ending two wars -- have been directly impacted these past eight years by the old style masculinity practiced by the president and much of the senior members of his administration. The now laughable image of George ("Mission Accomplished") W. triumphantly striding in his flight suit across the aircraft carrier deck, may be one John McCain longs to reprise, but it is the polar opposite of the brand of manhood Obama and Joe Biden are symbolizing. And lest some presume that a "new masculinity" is only something Obama is embodying, consider this: That at 65, Biden, a white, senior, respected Senate leader, is willing to play second fiddle to his younger, African American colleague, communicates volumes about what's possible in redefining masculinity.

Women have long asked the question: "Is it possible for more men to grow and change?" For them, and for all voters, this campaign season offers a simple, clear answer: "Yes, we can."

Copyright 2008 Women's eNews. All Rights Reserved.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, masculinity, obama, election08, mccain, manhood

Rob Okun is editor of Voice Male magazine. His essay, "Confessions of a Premature Profeminist" appears in Men Speak Out: Views on Gender, Sex and Power, (Routledge, 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Nov 3, 2008 7:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's really good - this kind of masculinity resurfacing (because it did exist at one time in the '60s and '70s, partly, before it was routed by the right). Barack Obama has taken it back and put it out there - he doesn't take any garbage from the right - he shoves it back in a very masculine way - addresses every mudslinging attempt with a back in your face attitude that I must confess, is balm for the suffering we have endured for years at the hands of the Rambos.

And yet, he is sensitive, thoughtful, nuanced and intelligent (I never thought I'd see the day when someone like this could pull it off in the face of Rambo style rulers that have dominated us for decades except for interregnums of elected Dems). If Barack Obama is elected I think we can safely say we won the presidential lottery.

Guess it's over for knee jerk "yourewithusoragainstus" cowboyism - we can only hope. We can definitely make a better world with his example. Cross your fingers.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: Woodpecker
Stereotyping much?
Posted by: rickiey on Nov 4, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
standard bearer for conventional manhood -- stubborn, controlling, shoot-from-the-hip, inflexible.

Do you really consider that progressive thinking?

Because it isn't.

There's no room among thinkers for caveman stereotypes, whether they are of men or women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stereotyping much? Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Stereotyping much? Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Stereotyping much? Posted by: misstexaskitty
» RE: Stereotyping much? Posted by: rickiey
yes and no
Posted by: anarchris on Nov 4, 2008 1:53 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this article raises an issue that is more important than many would realize but although i agree that macho ideas of communication and dealing with conflict are that of dinosaurs, remember that barack has talked of killing bin laden and going into pakisan and 'the good war' of afghanistan. his style of campaigning is more poised and dignified but i fear people will change their minds about obama when he supports a widening of war into syria and pakistan. nonetheless, this article reflects my values and observations as to what is essentially the matter with our institutions. they are anti social, anti emotional etc. they use language as a weapon to shield what they feel instead of reveal what they feel and manipulate what people feel instead of illicit what people feel. control is defined and suffocation, domination and subordination and not peaceful co existence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Manhood vs. A Manboy
Posted by: MizuInOz on Nov 4, 2008 2:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To me - a 62 yr old man - manhood has nothing to do with the typical macho attitude of bluff and bluster. I feel that is actually the playground bully still acting out because no one ever called him on his BS.

When I am in a position where I need to show strength, I allow the warrior within to surface - and I know I am still in control.

When I need to be compassionate, I allow the spiritual aspect of who I am, as well as the "lover" (in an emotional sense) to guide my path.

And when I need to lead or support another who is leading with integrity (key word), I follow the instincts of the King within.

I believe (and I am not the only man who feels this way) that a man is a boy until he accepts four cornerstones into his foundation of living. These have nothing to do with culture, religion or nationality. They have to do with truly being a man - in the most ancient of meanings.

Those four are:

1) Live in integrity - period. No compromise. How you do the little things is how you usually do everything.
2) Be accountable and responsible for your actions. Refuse to be a victim or victimise anyone - ever. Honour all men, women, children and animals. Respect the diversity of all life. And recognise that you are not always right.
3) When you betray a trust, make amends; do not just say you are sorry. Sorry usually means you are sorry you got caught. Making amends requires that you admit that you are responsible for your actions. (see 2 above)
4) Be of quiet service in you community. Do a good deed daily. Help others for no other reason except that you care.

If men were willing to love this way and live these principles, there would be none of the boyish games that are so dangerously played by foolish boy-men in power in government, commerce, religion and most especially - in families.

Cheers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Manhood vs. A Manboy Posted by: luzmejor
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement