Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

How the Candidates' Health Care Plans Would Affect Real People

By Trudy Lieberman, Columbia Journalism Review. Posted October 13, 2008.


A look at how Obama and McCain's health care plans would play out in ordinary Americans' lives.
Advertisement

This is the fifth in a series examining how the candidates' health care proposals will affect ordinary people who live in the river town of Helena-West Helena, Arkansas, and how the press could cover that angle. Part I is archived here, and parts II, III, and IV are archived here, here, and here.

Michelle Hernandez, age thirty-seven, hasn't had it easy. She grew up in Chicago and lived with her grandmother before moving to New Jersey to stay with other relatives. She eventually ended up in the South, where she and her four children now live with her kids' grandmother.

Her unstable life has also left her with unstable health care. She was first diagnosed with diabetes when she was pregnant with her daughter Jasmine, now seventeen. Five months ago, Jasmine was also diagnosed with the disease, which disproportionately affects Hispanics in the U.S. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that Hispanics are three times more likely than Caucasians to contract diabetes between the ages of eighteen and forty-four. Hernandez and her daughter are among those affected.

"I'm not feeling too well right now. I feel very weak," she says. "I'm not eating the right way." She often neglects breakfast and, when she is not working, boils an egg or a hot dog for lunch. Money for good food is scarce, and the local food bank tightly rations its stock.

Hernandez works three days per week making sandwiches at Subway. (She used to work a five-day week, but her health problems interfered.) She brings home $117 per week, which is spent on gasoline for her 1993 Chevy Blazer, a storage unit for her belongings, rent to her kids' grandmother, and food. Subway gives her no health insurance, and offers no workplace initiatives to help employees with chronic conditions like diabetes.

So Hernandez is uninsured. She cannot afford to buy a policy in the commercial market even if she could qualify, which she couldn't. Arkansas Medicaid won't take her either. She doesn't fit any of the eligibility categories. Medicaid officials have said that she might qualify under the "medically needy" program, but first she has to spend a large part of her income on medical care. But, she says, she doesn't have seventy-five dollars to pay for doctors' visits, even though she needs a check-up and an eye exam. Retinal exams, the standard of care for diabetics, are out of the question. "I can't see through these glasses," Hernandez says.

She finds herself in the classic Medicaid dilemma. She needs medical bills to qualify for Medicaid, but has no money to pay doctors in order to accumulate those bills. She has often gone without her medicines -- for a thyroid problem and her diabetes -- because they are unaffordable. Although a drug company assistance program periodically supplies insulin, the lack of proper, continuing care for her disease is taking its toll.

While all of her children currently qualify for Medicaid, Jasmine, the oldest, will "age" off Medicaid when she turns eighteen in December. She, too, will be uninsured with no way to treat her diabetes. Aging off health insurance is also a problem faced by children of wealthier parents. Indeed, some thirteen million young adults between ages nineteen and twenty-nine have no coverage. But for poor kids pushed off of Medicaid, the consequences can be particularly severe, since there usually isn't much extra money around to help them buy a policy.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, health care, mccain, diabetes, health care reform

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
World's Top 7 Healthcare Programs - worth a look
Posted by: sallyride on Oct 13, 2008 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reference: http://tinyurl.com/6ctamy

Patients, and physicians are tired of the massive verbiage spun out about "healthcare" - simply put, like our economy, there isn't any.

The top programs in the world cost no more than 1/2 of the GDP that America is spending on Medicare alone. No one can opt-out; they can "purchase" more luxuries if they're available, but not for the basic, excellent healthcare. Doctors don't become millionaires, but they're fine people, well educated, excellently trained.

This will show you that there is no intention by either candidate to set up a solid, economical health care plan for America. They keep re-inventing the wheel, and you writers fall for it all the time. Other nations testified that they merely looked for "what works best" and copied those parts of each others' programs.

Ralph Nader's plan will work overnight - free up the total cost of the first year's national health program for us. Why don't either one of these "other" candidates work with Nader? Where are the ethics in this financial mess? Someone (OIG) should be able to step in and stop simply bad programs these guys throw out at us. They obviously never had to budget, or plan their expenses for a family, or see people die because they have no care, no help, no income, and God-forbid someone ends up with blood poisoning from bad teeth - there's no help for them anywhere - DDS don't donate their time (it should be required for licensure).

Nader has no axes to grind - So when are these candidates going to prove to us who they use as "experts"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]