Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Troopergate: Palin's Abuse of Power -- A Lawyer's View

By oregondem , Daily Kos. Posted October 11, 2008.


Cut through the legal language, and the abuse of power is as bad as anything we've seen in the Bush era.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

How could Gov. Sarah Palin have "abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act" if her firing of Commissioner of Public Safety Walt Monegan was a "proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority"?

The first of these is Finding Number One in the Report to the Legislative Council filed on Friday by the independent investigator for the Alaska legislature.  The second is Finding Number Two.

Gotta love the language we lawyers use, dontcha?  I am going to provide some explanation of how both Findings can be issued in the same report.

The key is to focus on the words "abused her power by violating" the ethics laws (which apply to all employees of the executive branch of Alaska state government) in her attempts to get Trooper Wotoen fired, and the words her "constitutional and statutory authority" in regard to the actual firing of Commissioner Monegan.

She lawfully exercised her authority in terms of the laws setting forth what authority she has, but she violated different laws by acting in a manner that abused her use of power in regard to Trooper Wooten.

To put it another way, the Alaska constitution and statutes allow the Governor to do certain things, such as hire and fire officials at will.  If she engages in illegally unethical behavior, she has still exercised her lawful authority.  A court cannot overturn her actions as unconstitutional or contrary to the statutes setting forth how much authority she has.  

But her exercise of power in an illegally unethical manner is still a violation of law -- a different law.

Think of it this way:  Let's say that you are a major national politician and you have a gambling problem (as some do) and that you use your rich wife's money for your habit, without her knowledge or permission.  Heck, let's even say that you took the money from your kids' school's fund for band uniforms and gambled with it.  

You did not violate any statutory authority related to gambling.  The casino can't say that, as punishment for stealing from the kids (an illegal act) you have to give your winnings back to the casino!  Your punishment for that violation is elsewhere.

You still violated your power by acting in an unethical manner -- in fact, in a manner prohibited by law.  It is a question, in part, of where the remedy lies for the stealing of the kids' money in my gambling example, or the abuse of the public trust in the case of Gov. Palin's actual actions.

Page 48 of the Report points out that Alaska's ethics law states:

The legislature reaffirms that each public officer holds office as a public trust, and any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action is a violation of that trust.

After listing 18 "events" of improper behavior by Sarah and Todd Palin, the Report says on page 67 that Gov. Palin "knowingly" engaged in various kinds of improper behavior with regard to Trooper Wooten and therefore "abused her power as Governor" and "violated . . . the Ethics Act."

The Report also said on page 65 that "compliance with the code of ethics is not optional" and that the efforts to benefit her personal interests was a violation of "trust."

On page 71, the Report notes that the Constitution of Alaska allows the Governor to fire the head of any department for "virtually any reason."  It notes that she could have had some reasons in additional to her unethical motives, and that is enough to make the action constitutional.

She did not exceed the constitutional authority of the Governor's Office -- but perhaps even Governor Palin would agree that there are some standards that are even higher than those of a state's constitution.  Those who are religious would even say there are some "laws" that are higher.

The Alaska constitution sets minimal standards -- basically no limits at all -- on the exercise of authority by its Governor.  But abuse of power is still unlawful, in a separate sphere.  

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, sarah palin, abuse of power

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Scary Sarah: a new definition of INSANITY
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 11, 2008 12:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget Palin's abuse of power. Anyone with her "qualifications" who thinks he or she should be president of the United States is out of their fucking minds!

One more thing for NEW AlterNet visitors. If you are an undecided voter, learn the truth about Scary Sarah and her senile running mate's treasonous POW record by clicking on: Vote Against McCain (one of the HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushier than Bush
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Oct 11, 2008 12:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin is not admired by the religious right because she is sweet, innocent and kind. They admire her for the same reason they admired--and in many cases still admire--George W. Bush. She's authoritarian, overbearing, bigoted, sleazy, corrupt, adulterous, devious and ignorant. And the Christian conservatives adore her for it. She's Bushier than Bush, which is what they want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bushier than Bush Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: Bushier than Bush Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Bushier than Bush Posted by: Karl.Ben
here's a section already misquoted by her campaign people
Posted by: counterpoint on Oct 11, 2008 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein disagreed with Branchflower's conclusions. "In order to violate the ethics law, there has to be some personal gain, usually financial. Mr. Branchflower has failed to identify any financial gain," he said."
AP report

Lovely. What the attorney is doing here is giving the campaign a clue how to talk around this by redefining that 'gain' has to be financial, and since this was simply around revenge it doesn't count. Right...

Also, on Huffpost where I first saw this someone wrote that the allegations against Wooten were either years old (the moose thing), only witnessed by the Palins (the beer in the police car claim) or pointless (the stun gun used against his stepson was a harmless demo and the son laughed it off).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No, it's much, much worse
Posted by: dayahka on Oct 11, 2008 1:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't agree that Palin's abuse is as bad as Bush--it's much, much worse. Whatever we may individually or collectively think about George's mental acuity, I'm pretty certain that he has a rudimentary conscience and can tell the difference between right and wrong: He may have abused his power, but he KNEW he was doing wrong. Palin, on the other hand, appears to have no such conscience, no real cognitive skills, just a tongue attached to a mouth: anyone who thinks living next to a country qualifies someone in foreign policy is stupid. Palin appears to have a very bad mind, severely disorganized, and is unable to make logical or conceptual connections beyond possibly the elementary level: just read or listen to any of her responses to questions. She also has an inability to demarcate apples from oranges, personal from political, legal from instinctual and emotional. Look at her self-justification in troopergate, and the exact opposite conclusion reached by a bi-partisan committee. This woman is dangerous not so much because of her abuse of power (heck, show me a politician who hasn't) as because of her total lack of substance, as if she is non-human, just a face without a mind. And yet the poor woman is not at fault for reaching beyond her grasp--look who gave it to her, a man with a lifelong fondness for the pretty face and the empty head.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way to go Palin!
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Oct 11, 2008 2:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I give her credit for getting rid of a dirty cop in a corrupt system. At least she had the strength to do the right thing. No wonder she has the highest approval rating of any gov.

And since when do liberals support tasering children!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A simplified reconciliation of Branchwater
Posted by: AttyKoppel on Oct 11, 2008 2:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have some, but not a great deal, of experience with the law of wronful termination.

While I believe Branchwater basically got it right, his wording could have been better, but he did an overall excellent job given the pressures he was under.

He got it dead on regarding the abuse of power issue. However, Alaska should clean up its definitions. As they be, the definition of fiancial interest clearly includes that of a sibling or family member, while a non financial benefit must arguably be of direct benefit to the employee.

To say that Palin's firing of Monaghan was a lawful and proper exercise of her authority is a bit much. There is nothing proper about it, but it is lawful in the sense that the courts will not gainsay the decision of the executive, unless, perhaps, the sole reason for a firing is violative of an important public interest. Alaska may even uphold a termination solely for a reason against public interest. I don't know, but we don't need to go that far since it appears that she had some other reasons for firing the Commissioner.

There is some interesting history, here. When Palin took office as Mayor of Wasilla, she fired its top cop; the chief of police. When he sued for wronngful termination, his case was dismissed for the same legal reasons cited by Branchwater.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah, Russia
Posted by: alt082 on Oct 11, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"anyone who thinks living next to a country qualifies someone in foreign policy is stupid."

Why? I'm sure the Governor of Florida knows more about Cuba than the Gov of Alaska, and the Gov of Alaska knows more about Russia than the Gov of Florida.

In her role as Commander-in-Chief of the Alaska National Guard, Sarah Palin has received briefings on Russian military plane incursions near Alaskan airspace, an Alaska National Guard spokesman confirms to CBS News.

The revelation that Palin was briefed on Russian military incursions near U.S. airspace is the first concrete evidence that backs up the McCain campaign’s repeated assertion that Alaska’s proximity to Siberia has given Palin experience on U.S. policy related to Russia.

It may sound like a cat and mouse game more reminiscent of the Cold War than the post-9/11 world, but Russian bombers have recently engaged in exercises in which they have flown provocatively close to Alaskan airspace.

You can read the article here.
Exclusive: Palin Was Briefed On Russian Jet Incursions
(CBS)From CBS News' Scott Conroy:
www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/25/politics
/fromtheroad/entry4479278.shtm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you crazy or something? Posted by: cwilsondrum
» or a wall street insider... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Monagan threatened or incompetent
Posted by: lifeethics on Oct 11, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Public Report on the investigation of Governor Sarah Palin describes a bazaar incident. Commissioner Monegan delivered a color photograph of the ex-brother-in-law, Wooten, in full Alaska State Trooper uniform, to the Governor's office. He requested that the Governor autograph it and present it at the upcoming Police Memorial Day ceremony, for official use in AST offices. Although he says he was already under pressure to fire Wooten, Monegan claims he did not realize that the Trooper in the photograph was Wooten.

Was this incompetence or a hostile threat?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did Branchwater overlook recent employment law?
Posted by: AttyKoppel on Oct 11, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much confusion has been generated by the legislative report's seemingly inconsistent finding that Palin abused her power, but that there was nothing "improper" about Monaghan's firing.

Earlier I pointed out how it was possible to reconcile the two findings, because Alaska is an "at will" employment jurisdiction that does not recognize an exception to the at will rule where a firing is done for reasons violative of the "public interst." I was wrong.

I wish that I had done a quick check of Alaska law, before posting my earlier comment. In the last year, the Alaska Supreme Court recognized the "public policy" exception to the "at will" employment rule. See the November 2, 2007, opinion in Miller v. Safeway.

The decisions relied upon by Branchwater precede Miller v. Safeway. It appears that the firing of Commissioner Monaghan was both illegal and an abuse of power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old News?
Posted by: POLITICSPOET on Oct 13, 2008 4:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alaska has found power was hers to abuse.
But Palin continues to deny and refuse.
I'm so tired of her lies,
and her "Drill Baby!" cries,
Can't wait 'til November 4 when she is just old news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]