Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

Memo to GOP: Minority Homeowners Did Not Cause Wall St. Meltdown

By David Swanson, After Downing Street. Posted October 10, 2008.


ACORN has decidedly moved past the stage of being ignored and even the stage of being laughed at. ACORN is now being attacked. Next comes victory.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

From 2000 to 2003 I was the communications coordinator for ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. I don't know whether to be sorry or relieved that I don't have my old job now.

ACORN has been through some scandals of its own making, but it is currently all over the news because of a pair of absolutely fraudulent and nationally coordinated attacks.

One of these attacks involves accusations of voter fraud. But, of course, "voter fraud" almost doesn't exist, and federal prosecutors have lost their jobs because they couldn't find evidence of its existence to satisfy the Bush White House. In fact, the accusations against ACORN are not about voting, but about voter registration.

Now, if some kid fills out bogus forms in order to make more money from ACORN for supposedly registering voters, ACORN is supposed to try to catch that stuff and not turn in those forms. On the whole, ACORN has registered huge numbers of people with only a tiny percentage of problems. But the more important point is that the kid trying to scam extra bucks has no intention of trying to vote multiple times, risking imprisonment, and no intention of bringing in corpses to have them vote, as CNN seems to imagine. There's no money in fraudulent voting, only enormous risk. But there is money and power in vote suppression and vote miscounting, the major stories that this one is meant to distract from.

The other attack on ACORN focuses on blaming the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) for the collapse of Wall Street. Most subprime loans, and therefore most predatory loans, are not made in order to comply with CRA. In fact, low-income and minority communities have seen a great deal of activism in recent years demanding that the predatory lenders stay out, not in. ACORN coined the phrase "predatory lending" and made news years ago by beginning a major campaign to keep loans that are worse than nothing out of neighborhoods.

Predatory loans are not loans made to the wrong kind of people. They are loans made in very deceptive ways with the aim of making the borrower believe they'll be able to pay it back, but with the aim of making them fail. Predatory mortgage lenders make money by refinancing repeatedly, extracting more fees each time, and eventually seizing the property. This is accomplished with misleading fine print that strips people of their equity through all sorts of hidden fees and charges and rate increases, and by consolidating credit card and other debt with house debt. Every year, ACORN produces a lengthy report documenting the targeting of racial minorities with these loans.

For years, ACORN has led efforts to ban predatory loans through local and state legislation, while the same gang that is now so upset about these loans being made has fought endlessly against bans and restrictions.

The good news is that the family of organizations known as ACORN is growing, raising wages, improving schools, reforming corporations, building housing, organizing active citizens, and clearly threatening the powers that be. ACORN has decidedly moved past the stage of being ignored and even the stage of being laughed at. ACORN is now being attacked. Next comes victory.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: acorn

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Poor People Did It...
Posted by: Carol Burns on Oct 11, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they brought down Wall Street. What a load of bull. Once again, blame the victim. So, not only did you lose your house, you are to blame for the country (and the world) going down. God only loves rich people; that's why he blessed them with wads of cash. Gotta love the "conservative rationale".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Poor People Did It... Posted by: luzmejor
RE: Youth And Vigour Makes Us Bigger
Posted by: edtattom on Oct 11, 2008 11:12 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell does age have to do with all of this? Obama will win because because his Republican predecessor has failed miserably and because the economy has tanked. Not that I mean to take anything away from Obama. Obama is a very talented politician, and no doubt he will remain a talented politician when he's McCain's age. "Youth and Vigour Makes Us Bigger" huh? Does mindless, insulting stereotyping make us bigger? I hope thirty to forty years from now you remember this hideous braying of yours. Maybe then you'll understand that your sentiments are just as foul as anything spewed from the mouths of a Nazi or a KKK member.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Youth And Vigour Makes Us Bigger
Posted by: phatkhat on Oct 11, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Say, could you send me some of whatever you are smoking? ROTFLMAO.

Do you really think that Obama can make the kinds of changes you mention? Or that he even wants to? How much have the Dems changed things after our great celebration in 2006? Not much. And Obama won't either.

I'm voting for him (unless I write in Kucinich), but only as the lesser of the evils.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Youth And Vigour Makes Us Bigger
Posted by: mygirlboo on Oct 11, 2008 12:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Melpol, I so hope you are right. If only I were young again and idealistic. It disturbs me that Obama has gotten the most contributions from Wall Street and the big bankers. It disturbs me that this ACORN group is being investigated all over the country for fraud. It disturbs me that ACORN stands to gain millions of dollars from the $700 billion dollar bail-out on the backs of the American people. I've been a Democrat all my life, raised by Democrats, who were in turn raised by Democrats, and with precious few exceptions, I don't recognize my own party. I come from people who have always pulled their own weight, not from welfare people who think everyone else owes them a living. I remember when the Democratic Party used to protect the American people from the evils of this capitalism-run-amok crowd. When Nancy Pelosi protects Delmonte from having to pay minimum wage to workers from America Samoa, I think the Democrats have gone astray. Although I haven't bought Delmonte since, I haven't driven them out of business--but I keep on plugging. Obama is promising things we can't afford to deliver. Things are going to be very tough from now on--no more American standard of life for most of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

other, more probable motives for predatory lending
Posted by: oregonstu on Oct 11, 2008 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is true that forclosed properties will ultimately be siezed, but this is not a likely motive for lenders to make loans that they know are unlikely to be repaid, since the loans are generally made for amounts that exceed the real value of the property - in other words, the lender would lose money in that case if they held the loan.
However, what happened in this mess was that the loans were being repackaged in complex CDO's and sold and resold to investors that were unaware of the risky nature of the loans. The lenders made a profit from bad loans and then got rid of them, and passed the risks off to someone else.
The fact that minorities - particularly black neighborhoods - were disproportionately targeted by predatory lenders is quite telling. This was not confined to poor minorities -
there is a clear pattern of black borrowers being targeted accross the income spectrum with deceptive loans which are now resulting in high rates of default and foreclosure.
The obvious connection that this has with the GOP's tactics of ACTUAL electoral fraud (as opposed the their attempts to distract attention from this fraud with their bogus claims of minority voter fraud) is what we need to bring into focus.
Isn't it obvious that there must be some motive for the targeting of minority neighborhoods by predatory lenders, especially when it isn't simply poor minorities that are targeted? Can we assume that it is simple racism at play here, or might there be another explanation?
How about the fact that we now know that the GOP is using forclosure lists to cage voters? and the fact that they have targeted minority (especially black) voters for caging in recent elections for the ovbious reason that blacks overwhelmingly vote Democratic?
As usual, the right wing is turning everything inside out and inverting the truth, but their chutzpa in this case is breathtaking. The fact is that predatory lending that deliberately and disproportionately targeted minorities was part of the fraudulent process that has played a central role in the financial meltdown. The large majority of these loans were made by institutions that were exempt from the CRA, using loan criteria that were ridiculously lax in comparison to those stipulated by the CRA. The CRA had nothing at all to do with the meltdown, but fraudulent predatory lending that took place primarily outside of the constraints of the CRA DID.
The voter registration efforts of ACORN have nothing at all to do with electoral fraud, but it does appear likely that these very same predatory lenders were being influenced to target black (Democratic) borrowers, wittingly or unwittingly, in order to further the vast campaign of GOP electoral fraud that has subverted American democracy for at least the past 8 years.
One last observation: regarding the bogus voter registration forms turned in by some kid working for ACORN.... how unlikely is it that some dirty trickster paid him to do so in order to discredit the most effective progressive voter registration organisation in the country? Guess where I place my bet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Regrets
Posted by: calmecac5 on Oct 11, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several years ago ACORN offered me a job as a community organizer. Although I am very satisfied with the way my life has moved in recent years, I sometimes regret not having taken the position with ACORN, which has turned into one of the best people's organizations in the country. Barck Obama's transition team should be looking to ACORN leadership for Cabinet and other appointments in the economic and financial areas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The obvious...
Posted by: grindermonkey on Oct 11, 2008 3:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be obvious that a cabal of poor people organized themselves using the internet timed with solar flares and advanced technology to conspire and successfully borrow $700 billion from naive and innocent lenders. Horrific. What won't they think of next?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good& bad election behavior
Posted by: gzuckier on Oct 11, 2008 8:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
signing up scads of poor people who would otherwise have no clue about how to get their vote, but in the process getting a few people registered who shouldn't be- Bad! Very bad!

purging the voting lists of felons, but in the process barring large numbers of people whose only crime is to have a name similar to somebody on the felon list, and not checking any further: - Well, that's too bad but you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs etc. etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement