Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Obama vs. McCain: Our Democracy and Elections Are Both Vibrant and in Peril -- Voter Guide

AlterNet. Posted October 17, 2008.


From voter suppression to trust in public elections, a look at the candidates' positions on 10 important voter issues.
Advertisement

Download this Voter Guide as a .PDF

American democracy is both vibrant and deeply imperiled in 2008. As millions of Americans pay attention to the presidential campaign, with thousands volunteering in battleground states, there is no doubt Americans are concerned and engaged. However, the foundation of our representative democracy, the voting process and public trust in elections, is threatened in unprecedented ways. America's democratic infrastructure -- the way we vote and count those ballots -- has deep systematic problems. The country could be on the verge of the third consecutive presidential election in which a mix of bad election administration, unreliable vote-counting technology and deliberate partisan tactics will sully the vote count and the legitimacy of the next president.

The progressive focus on democracy issues has evolved to reflect these concerns. A decade ago, campaign finance reform was the priority. At that time, Sen. John McCain was known for shepherding the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act through Congress. That bill sought to dilute the impact of wealthy people and interests by further regulating political donations. Progressives supported the bill and were enthusiastic about state-level public financing campaign reforms. Before Sen. Barack Obama was elected to federal office, he supported public financing as a candidate and as a law professor.

But during the 2008 campaign, both candidates have made generally vague statements about protecting the right to vote. And McCain and Obama each have flip-flopped on previous stances to suit their presidential campaign strategies, with Obama rejecting public financing and McCain turning to notable numbers of lobbyists to staff his campaign.

So which candidate comes closest to addressing the pressing issues associated with recent national elections? AlterNet reviewed Obama and McCain's voting records and recent statements to see how the two compare on everything from election management to voter suppression.

1. VOTER REGISTRATION

Tens of millions of Americans do not vote, in some cases because they have to jump through bureaucratic hurdles to qualify and register as voters. Some of those hurdles are designed by Republicans to keep certain sectors of the public from voting because higher voter turnout would threaten their majorities. When Republicans cite "voter fraud" as a concern, they usually are seeking to make voting more arduous than necessary to deter voter turnout. Across the country there is a range of registration laws, with every state except North Dakota requiring voters to register. A few states have Election Day registration, meaning residents can register and vote on Election Day. In the other states, registration can be a simple or more complex process, with deadlines and ID requirements. The more complicated the process, the greater the likelihood that people will not vote.

  • Solution: Election Day registration (or same-day registration for early voting) is the best solution, in tandem with early voting opportunities (where eligible voters can register and then vote). The best way to combat exaggerated partisan claims about voter registration fraud, or the same person voting more than once, is public education. Voters need to ensure their registration is current, bring the correct ID to the polls, and have confidence they will be able to vote, even if the GOP threatens to challenge their credentials at polling places, as some Republicans are now doing.
  • Obama's position: Obama supports Election Day registration. His campaign recently sued the Republican Party in Michigan over threats by local party officials that the GOP would be challenging the voter registrations of people who lost their homes to foreclosures.
  • McCain's position: McCain supports making voter registration easier. His campaign has not taken a position on Election Day registration, although he told WhyTuesday.org that he does not favor making Election Day a holiday. The Republican National Committee and state party operations have said Democratic "voter fraud" is an issue needing policing.
  • Learn more: ProjectVote.org, TruthAboutFraud.org, BrennanCenter.org, AdvancementProject.org, CampaignLegalCenter.org, Demos.org

2. VOTER SUPPRESSION AND BARRIERS TO VOTING

For decades, partisans have used the voter registration process and ballot access rules to try to shape the electorate to their advantage. In general, the more complex the voting process, the greater the chance of deterring eligible citizens from voting. Perhaps the most controversial example of this concerns Election Day voter challenges, in which some states allow political parties to station volunteers at polling places to challenge individual voters' registrations. In those cases, the challenged voters -- who tend to be first-time voters such students, poor people and people of color -- must document that their registration information matches their current address to vote.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: politics, elections, democracy, voting, money, voter registration, voter suppression, vote counts, election management, electronic election recor

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You never know what you have till its 2014
Posted by: mindfulyouth on Oct 18, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It may be incredibly tough to vote sometimes. The process is daunting to dissuade those to lazy to not vote... think... would you want someone to lazy to register, and go vote, to really weigh in on their opinion. It would probably be unfounded and invalid anyway. HOWEVER,

we must vote if we can, we must vote aware and intelligently, we must not be distracted by flashy distractions.

Ive been recently reading a book that perfectly describes the future we may be embarking on if we dont vote and live consciously. The administration of McSame and Palin would only be a continuation of the Bush Regime and the possibilities it reveals... check out the scary possibility that McCain and Palin present in America2014: an Orwellian Tale at www.America2014.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article and the lack of comments on it reflect the true problem!
Posted by: MuddPi on Oct 19, 2008 11:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article contains the very essence of what has gone wrong with our electoral system.
Notice whose answers appear in the article:
Obama
McCain
and which issues they have no record or opinion on.
No McKinney (Green), Nader (Independent), Barr (Libertarian) etc etc

Without a non-partisan, multi-party system, we are stuck in a rut between these two ship of fools who have both, YES BOTH, gotten us into this financial and war quagmire.
They believe you have no choice, and you won't if you let them continue their stranglehold on our political system. If you're conservative you vote Repub, if you're anything near liberal you vote Dem. Plain and simple. They just yo-you every 8 yrs and continue to make a bloody mess of everything knowing they own your vote.
Don't you people ever get tired of it all?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who really runs this country?
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Oct 20, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subject: Henry is not just a stumbbling old man who was once Secretary of State under Nixon.

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." Henry Kissinger.

Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy. Henry Kissinger.

Henry Kissinger was born a German and raised in America. He has no respect for our Constitution or laws. He never served in the armed forces and went to war...he only started them. His arrogance is staggering considering the opportunities he was given in America to succeed. Certainly he did not start out being so self serving but power being what it is, he got lost along the way.

Henry wanted to run for President but couldn't because he wasn't American born (as required by the Constitution). This must be why he hates this country. He is one of those Nixon crooks who still kept his power. He has been involved in many scandals yet escapes blame.

In his quest for power he did everything "undemocratic". He is in a way President since he runs those secret organization who decide our future...the Trilateral Commission,the Bilderburg Group, and the Council on Foreign Relations, etc. They decide who wins and who gets power. He went about being powerful undemocratically and illegally. Those who want power join these groups. We allow them power by ignoring them. Anything held in secret and behind closed doors in our name is not democracy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger#cite_note-49 All about Kissinger.

"The New World Order cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions. Just like Zishan says" Kissinger.

The New World Order is Fascism and certainly undemocratic. There is nothing "orderly" about it. It is born out of chaos and fear. They betrayed their public trust. What is it about DC politicans when they get power they want to rule the world? It's not their power but all Americans. We died and pay for it.

Why has Kissinger not been jailed for these groups which violate the Logan Act? He iswas never elected by the people of America (or the world) to decide their future. That is a felony with huge fines and jail.

Unless we do something about this abuse of power by the few elite our vote means little.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

instant runoff voting or ranked voting
Posted by: whealeydj on Oct 23, 2008 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
was not addressed in article and should have been. This would enable a voter to designate 1st 2nd and 3rd choices until a 50% plus winner is found. It should strengthen 3rd parties because a voter could vote their conscience first (like McKinney) and their compromise position 2nd (like Obama). Wouldnt this be allow expression of diversity of political opinion rather than same old duopoly of staus quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

electriclady281
Posted by: electriclady281 on Oct 27, 2008 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
INTENTION is a key to goals:

Many of you know of meditation and of making intentions and know how very powerful they are. It is my intention that Barak Obama is our next president, and I believe that he has made that intention as well. If the millions of American voters who want Barak Obama to be our president not only vote (early, for vote-security purposes) AND also make the same intention...how can we fail?

MEDITATE ON OBAMA; VISUALIZE HIM PRESIDENT.

INTEND THAT BARAK OBAMA IS OUR PRESIDENT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mistrust in our Democratic and Republican liars for president...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 27, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...extends easily into doubts about the election process. It's hard to listen to them promise, lie, backtrack, doubletalk, and then have faith that the outcome is an honest election, even though the liars' campaigns and voting process are unrelated at the technical level. Congress has a 14% approval rating--and it's just as likely that our lack of faith in them shines through in our lack of faith in the voting process.

Dishonesty in the candidates, and our lack of faith in the "leaders" we choose leads naturally to suspicion over their ascension to the presidency, etc., even though it's your local librarian, retiree, etc. overseeing your balloting.

Sure, when 300M set out to vote, you bet there will be human error, and quite possibly some deliberate mischief in some isolated instances. There will also be folks who are inelegible to vote at the places they decide to head to. Errors can be corrected, people can be redirected to their proper, registered polling place, and those that deliberately impede the democratic process should be subject to civil and legal action. Folks should also educate themselves as to the registration process to make sure they are eligible to vote according to their state's prescribed procedures.

We should not confuse our dishonest, incompetent politicians actions with a massive breakdown in the voting process. We toss the bums out, and put new, less bummy, folks in for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conservatives control demographics
Posted by: slfiore on Oct 27, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two phenomena are increasingly apparent in the demographics of the United States and the effect on our elections.

First is the differing birth rates between young couples who tend to vote conservative (4 - 5 children) and those who tend to vote liberal (1.5 children). In one generation that will make a huge difference.

Second is the benefit to conservative political parties in shrinking the middle class and erecting more barriers to improving low income Americans' economic status. These people are eking out a living with no time or money for higher education. Often their public schools are underfunded and poorly staffed. They are the people who are most easily swayed by political dirty tricks because their critical thinking skills have not been developed by a good education. The No Child Left Behind Act focuses on memorizing facts and formulas, not on critical thinking. It has long been recognized that a vibrant democracy depends on universal quality public education.

Is anyone paying attention to these two factors?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Election disputed already by McCain
Posted by: Dana L. Stern on Oct 27, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator John McCain the sidekick of President Bush will stop at nothing to win the election. Lies, distortions, statments taken out of context are used to mislead the masses. Much like Adoph Hitler did when coming to power. Our democracy is in danger! America, stand up and be counted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

once again - THERE ARE MORE THAN TWO CANDIDATES
Posted by: A. James on Oct 27, 2008 4:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on the pennsylvania ballot that i will be mailing in today, i have 4 choices for the offices of president and vice president. FOUR. not 2. you want to talk about how votes might get stolen? how about talking about all the votes stolen from nader, mckinney, barr, and baldwin because every goddamn institution in this country is rigged to keep their voices from being heard, to keep the citizens of this country in the dark about the fact that there are REAL choices to be made in this election. i'm calling the staff of alternet out AGAIN on this - you claim to be a progressive media outlet and yet systematically cleave to the status quo of a 'two' party system. SHAME ON YOU ALTERNET!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USA BEFORE PARTY!
Posted by: EXCELLENCES on Oct 29, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
October 29, 2008

Greetings Fellow USA Citizens:

That right SIX (6) days to go for our new change in our USA President!

Serve The United States of America! Vote! We can continue to be and remembered as we are the living progressive example of the government of advancement, that continues to deliver change for the world to emanate in their government. We do have a fail proof government that we must continue to navigate and respect. What can we do for our country beyond party lines to foster One Nation under God?
A lot of us must ask ourselves: Can we and will we put aside our bitterness, differences, and party pride aside to serve our country as leaders for the sake of the United States of America? The time is now! Thank God, many leaders are showing their love for the USA over parties. With the failed 20TH Century posturing of earmark, pork barrel, interest groups, and distortion, the USA government must seek advancement through a President that will lock into place a ‘Unique Cabinet’, with a Bi-partisan Coalition locked into place to expedite crises intervention. We don’t need our political leaders to undermine the new growth and understanding of the ‘New 21ST Century Educated Voting Citizens’ of Advancement and Change’!
Congress remember, we put you there for the people of America first, and the party second. Presidential candidates the citizens of America are aware of the internal party differences......put the crises of the United States of America on the back burner of the politic of Capitol Hill and not the forefront of their give and take.
Honorable Michael Bloomberg, thank you for yesterday’s message to our candidates: http://www.newsweek.com/id/165642
Please, remind the Presidential candidates who we are looking to lead the people of America, we need a 'New 21ST Century Big Deal' fostered and monitored through an Administrative Bi-partisan Coalition to expedite 'crises changes'. Through bi-partisan representations, through both of our congressional bodies, the Senate and the House of Representatives, we will unite the United States of America
We the citizens and people of America desire a ‘Presidential Maverick of Change’ or a ‘Presidential Leader with Innovative Change’ that will acknowledge the United States of America’s need for a ‘Presidential Capitol Hill Administrative Balanced Bi-Partisan Coalition’.
This coalition will expedite crises interventions regarding our economy, foreign policies, energy, USA cultural/moral deprivation, USA employment, housing, consumer rights and alleviate a realistic, oncoming, thirty-two (32) months of congressional gridlock caused by generations of ungrounded strife and tension that both candidates are well aware of. A ‘Bipartisan Coalition’ with in the newly formed ‘Presidential Cabinet’, if put together effectively can eliminate.
Our country need leaders with insight and rather than leaders that are party driven rather than solution driven. Insight not hindsight! A genuine ‘olive branch of a bi-partisan coalition’ is needed. Yes,‘a pricking thorny stem’ of partisan spoilage during this time in USA history will lead to disaster and irrefutable setbacks. This election is a Blessing and the reflection of a true democracy government in a republic country, the United States of America. The call for salt in the USA must be used as a preparation so that it will support the healing of a nation through friendly pain. We must not forget the history of our forefathers (They accepted such a call from our country to get us this far IN THE HISTORY OF OUR GOVERNMENT.) that struggled to allow us to realize this mature time in the history of growth and change of our nation. Let's adhered to the responsibilities bestowed on us as leaders and citizens.
In spirit and truth, God Bless America,home, sweet home! -E.RAYE.WALKER EXCELLENCES

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]