Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Is This Election the Major Historical Turning Point It Seems to Be? Yes

By Chalmers Johnson, Tomdispatch.com. Posted October 8, 2008.


A small election victory won't drastically turn around any of the darker challenges our country faces -- only a massive victory can do that.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, Barack Obama called the forthcoming presidential election a "defining moment" in this country's history. It is conceivable that he is right. There are precedents in American history for an election inaugurating a period of reform and political realignment.

Such a development, however, is extremely rare and surrounded by contingencies normally beyond the control of the advocates of reform. So let me speculate about whether the 2008 election might set in motion a political reconfiguration -- and even a political renaissance -- in the United States, restoring a modicum of democracy to the country's political system, while ending our march toward imperialism, perpetual warfare, and bankruptcy that began with the Cold War.

The political blunders, serious mistakes, and governmental failures of the last eight years so discredited the administration of George W. Bush -- his average approval rating has fallen to 27% and some polls now show him dipping into the low twenties -- that his name was barely mentioned in the major speeches at the Republican convention. Even John McCain has chosen to run under the banner of "maverick" as a candidate of "change," despite the fact that his own party's misgoverning has elicited those demands for change.

Bringing the opposition party to power, however, is not in itself likely to restore the American republic to good working order. It is almost inconceivable that any president could stand up to the overwhelming pressures of the military-industrial complex, as well as the extra-constitutional powers of the 16 intelligence agencies that make up the U.S. Intelligence Community, and the entrenched interests they represent. The subversive influence of the imperial presidency (and vice presidency), the vast expansion of official secrecy and of the police and spying powers of the state, the institution of a second Defense Department in the form of the Department of Homeland Security, and the irrational commitments of American imperialism (761 active military bases in 151 foreign countries as of 2008) will not easily be rolled back by the normal workings of the political system.

For even a possibility of that occurring, the vote in November would have to result in a "realigning election," of which there have been only two during the past century -- the election of Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 and of Richard Nixon in 1968. Until 1932, the Republicans had controlled the presidency for 56 of the previous 72 years, beginning with Abraham Lincoln's election in 1860. After 1932, the Democrats occupied the White House for 28 of the next 36 years.

The 1968 election saw the withdrawal of the candidacy of President Lyndon Johnson under the pressure of the Vietnam War, the defeat of his vice president, Hubert Humphrey, not to mention the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. That election, based on Nixon's so-called southern strategy, led to a new political alignment nationally, favoring the Republicans. The essence of that realignment lay in the running of Republican racists for office in the old Confederate states where the Democrats had long been the party of choice. Before 1968, the Democrats had also been the majority party nationally, winning seven of the previous nine presidential elections. The Republicans won seven of the next ten between 1968 and 2004.

Of these two realigning elections, the Roosevelt election is certainly the more important for our moment, ushering in as it did one of the few truly democratic periods in American political history. In his new book, Democracy Incorporated, Princeton political theorist Sheldon Wolin suggests the following: "Democracy is about the conditions that make it possible for ordinary people to better their lives by becoming political beings and by making power responsive to their hopes and needs."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008

Chalmers Johnson is the author of three linked books on the crises of American imperialism and militarism. They are Blowback (2000), The Sorrows of Empire (2004), and Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic (2006). All are available in paperback from Metropolitan Books.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well-stated thesis
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Oct 8, 2008 1:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't agree more with the major points made by this distinguished writer. But apart from underlying racism and regionalism, the principle reason that there will be no "defining moment" in November is that this is a "house divided" and it is fueled by hatred, intolerance and ignorance that no political party or individual candidate can reconcile or reverse. More than 55 million people cast votes for Bush/Cheney in 2004 and I see no evidence that any of them earned a Ph.D. in common sense or civics since then. Think so? Then you explain McCain/Pailin and why this fiasco called an election is not a certifiable slam dunk. It's time to be scared folks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The race factor is real and HUGE
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 8, 2008 1:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe McCain will become our 44th president and continue the Bush administration's treasonous activities.

Because the rightwing GOP has so much to lose in November, I contend the neocons will do anything short of assassination to win the eletion. And I'm not sure about that!

I especially feel that way after watching Christopher Dickey last month on C-SPAN.

Newsweek's Paris bureau chief, he was new to me but not his father, James Dickey, author of the unforgettable 1970 novel, Deliverance.

Like me, the younger Dickey was raised in the Deep South. Using his childhood experience to open doors and minds, he recently toured Republican red states and chatted with the locals. Based on numerous interviews during the trip, he anecdotally concluded that racism is alive and well throughout the South.

Combining frank conversations with various opinion polls, Dickey believes even if 100% of black people vote for Obama, they won't offset the number of white citizens -- Democrats, Republicans and independents -- who don't want a man of color in the White House.

Yet, at the same time, many bigots favor a Democrat-controlled Congress. Never mind that Herr Busch and the goose-stepping GOP has turned the U.S. presidency into a "unitary" executive, with virtually unlimited dictatorial authority over our lives.

Thanks to the War Powers Act, Patriot Act, signing statements and Republican Stepford wives in the Senate and House of Representatives, four years under a McCain administration will probably be our nation's tipping point. While the rest of the world shakes it collective head in disbelief, this sweet land of liberty my ancestors fought and died for, starting with the American Revolution, will plunge into the dustbin of history as a failed democracy.

One more thing for NEW AlterNet visitors. If you are an undecided voter, learn the truth about Unfit McCain and his so-called "heroic" war record by clicking on: Vote Against McCain (one of the HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race and Age
Posted by: Ayuh! on Oct 8, 2008 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Obama wins, there will almost certainly be an attempt on his life. This is a deeply racist nation. I don't mean to be morbid, but I thought it was important that Obama pick a stellar VP for this very reason. Biden is OK, but not stellar. I'm not sure a President Biden could win a term in his own right after finishing an assassinated Obama's term.

Then there's age. The oldest voters are rock solid. They vote, and they vote Republican. The youngest voters, not so much. They are notoriously untrustworthy as voters. They're enthusiastic, they push their candidates, wave signs, etc. But they figure that since they've probably generated at least a few voters for their candidate, they don't need to bother showing up to vote themselves.

So the moral is: Obama better have amazing Secret Service, and people better call their young friends on election day and bribe them or physically drag them to the polls if necessary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ace and Age Posted by: Lauren
» RE: ace and Age Posted by: VZEQICVA
Let's hope for the best..Obama/Biden
Posted by: pana on Oct 8, 2008 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have to get behind Obama/Biden, who are the only ones capable of leading this country. They are smart. Go Obama/Biden.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CRITICAL Turning Point
Posted by: Carol Burns on Oct 8, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a defining moment in our history. 1968 was also such a year, as pointed out by the author. The future of our country hangs in the balance; make no mistake. There is one leader in our midst who can take us out of the collective nightmare that has stifled our freedoms and almost reduced us to a Nazi imperialist banana republic. That candidate is Barack Obama.
Obama/Biden '08!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice thoughts but let's be honest.
Posted by: frankly1 on Oct 8, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article would have some real merit if it were not for the fact that it is attempting to describe the possibilities of the election in the USA. The vast majority of Americans are stupid, greedy, racist and ignorant - exactly as they have been raised to be! Now they are getting scared. The super rich corpoate state has stole thier lunch, dinner and are looking at breakfast. The election will be rigged just like the last two were. We will get the glorious leader that the facist owners of this country choose for us. The seig heil salute was invented by Hess, maybe we should have a national school competition to invent a new one for us, sponsored by IBM. I propose punching ourselves in the face and screming "USA IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So sweet! Posted by: frankly1
McCain's DIRTY LITTLE SECRET in Arizona
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Oct 8, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For 26 years John McCain did NOTHING to stop the worst Human Rights violations in America because all 10,000 victims and their abusers vote Republican.

This video will BLOW YOUR MIND.

http://www.bankingonheaven.com/

BANKING ON HEAVEN . COM

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Turning Point Indeed
Posted by: Malcolm Medgar on Oct 8, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The brilliant Dr. Johnson starts his analysis with a statement made by Barack Obama and proceeds then to test the idea without regard to the candidate himself, save references to the Bradley effect and race. He achieves an uncommon clarity with this approach.

There is a current in the liberal/progressive intelligensia to express disappointment with Obama's unwillingness to be a failed candidate or a dead hero for the cause. How could he vote for the FISA bill, how could he cave on offshore drilling, how could he...? Among other things, these folks are out of touch with their own racism.

Early on in this process Obama was ambushed in a nationally televised debate by GE's mouthpiece, the late Tim Russert, and challenged to reject and condemn Minister Louis Farrakhan. Minister Farrakhan had dared to say about Barak Obama, “This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better.” Obama knew that the demand that the intellectual author and leader of the redemptive Million Man March be denounced came from men who would see him dead before they would see him president but “this young man” went to his knees to remain a viable candidate. And Louis Farrakhan understood completely!

The dying Republican party's apparatus then took it to another level. Rush Limbaugh, one of the most vicious and dangerous racists in human history, ranted that Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr., the minister who married Obama and his wife Michelle, the iconic leader of the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago since 1972, is a “race-baiter and a hatemonger.” A national Limbaugh-led mob howled that this holy man must be denounced and renounced, and again for the sake of his chances to be president, Obama knelt before them again and called Rev. Wright’s profound truth telling “inflammatory and appalling.” And save a brief bout of ego, Rev. Wright understood completely.

Have no illusions about Barak Obama. He is auditioning with the ruling class in this campaign for president, and judging by pats on the head from Rupert Murdoch and Warren Buffet, he is giving a credible performance. The candidate is desperately trying to convince them an Obama Administration would be business as usual, his empty rhetoric about change notwithstanding.

What everyone in this country needs to realize though is that Louis Farrakhan, Jerimiah Wright, the African-American population of the United States, and the people of a world where racism holds less sway are quietly watching. They have consciously and voluntarily muted their support for Obama. They are going to give white America every opportunity to do the right thing here. They would like a peaceful transformation of this country.

In debate analysis on CNN last night James Carville came closest to capturing the dynamics at work. He said if Barack Obama goes into this election with a clear five-point lead in the polls and loses... Carville was unable to find the words to finish the thought in terms that would be palatable to his audience.

This goes beyond Obama the candidate for president. Something the ruling class can never permit must happen before Obama, a Black man, can be elected. Obama will win 95-plus% of a record turnout of Black voters. But he will win the presidency only with a substantial number of white working class votes. This would constitute a level of working class unity like we have never witnessed in US electoral history.

Such unity would shake this county’s ever constricting capitalist bourgeois democracy to its foundation. One of the main engines of that capitalist economy is racism. For the sake of profits racial divisions and the super exploitation of workers of color must be kept intact—at all costs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Let us pray Posted by: thistleblower
Turning Point Indeed II
Posted by: Malcolm Medgar on Oct 8, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason that chattel slavery came into existence in the semi-feudal agrarian US economy of the time was that it was very profitable for the masters of that economy.

The reason that racism is so pervasive in the United States today with its developed industrial, albeit collapsing, capitalist economy is that it is very profitable for the masters of that economy.

It took the bloodiest war in US history and hundreds of thousands of white workers willing to fight to the death to end chattel slavery. No election and no candidate for office will end racism in this country. As long as capitalism exists elections will only produce racist results.

The least important thing about Barak Obama is his empty rhetoric about change. The ruling class chuckles over such nonsense. What they are stricken over is the possibility that working-class whites might make their first halting steps toward an effective political relationship with their brothers and sisters of color. They know their history. They know that was the dynamic that brought down the slave economy. They know that would be the beginning of the end for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War toys......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 8, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is this very "military industrial complex" monster that Eisenhower warned about that no one wants to pay attention too! All of the money allocated for "Defense Spending" goes to weapons that (1)have been shown not to work, think Star Wars! & (2) are ineffectual for the current fiasco that we find ourselves in! What has happened is eager little boys that "had other things to do" when it was their turn, were itching to show the "power" of the US!

What I would really like to know from white people that refuse to support Sen. Obama because of his color, is this: (1)do you believe that somehow this man will do something to help African Americans and what ever "it" is will not be done for the rest of America? (2) I've been voting for white men since I've been eligible to vote and if nothing else these last 8 years prove that this country black/white/asian/latino are all being screwed, unless you are at the top 1% of Americans! People please let me get this right, so as long as it's a white man screwing you over it's okay? & (3) what makes you believe that simply because Congress has been derelict in their duties for the last 8 years, they will not be totally on point during an Obama Presidency?

Can you just think about that, and maybe let me get an answer. Thanks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Spiritgirl... Posted by: bobtr900
Military-industrial complex is subverting the Republic
Posted by: Garvagh on Oct 8, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great piece! The imperial presidency is being created to enable the prosecution of endless war in the Middle East, to keep the American public confused and frightened. Gargantuan "defense" spending goes unchallenged by the Congress. Insane levels of armaments are augmented daily! A country posing no threat whatever to the US (Iran) is demonized almost hourly by the American media in a scheme closely tied to the Israel lobby and Israeli militarists seeking permanent oppression of the Palestinians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I beg confusion
Posted by: Hans B on Oct 8, 2008 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a great admirer of Chalmer Johnson's writings, but the term "realigning election" confuses me. The Nixon election was a geographic realignment, in that the Republican Party claimed the South. But the 1932 election? Other than across-the-board Democratic dominance for several decades, I don't see it. The 1952 electoral map looks much like that of 1928.

If realignment means a switch to another dominant ideology, surely Reagan's election qualifies. The Democrats may have had 8 years in the White House since then, but much of that was with a Republican congress allied with restive Reagan-Democrats. And let's not forget the founding of the DLC during the Reagan years. (Or maybe Mr Johnson considers Reagan's administration as a continuation of the Nixon realignment.)

In both cases - whether we speak of geography of or ideology - the coming election may prove to be transformative not just because of a Democratic landslide, but also because of the unraveling of the unnatural coalition Reagan put together, of evangelicals and neocon agnostics, small-government conservatives and authoritarians. Many conservatives seem to hope that this will allow the rebuilding of their movement, for example, consider this gem by religious conservative Rod Dreher (which I found on Andrew Sullivan's blog, another showcase of conservative rebellion):

"The silver lining: Obama and the Democrats are going to own this godawful mess. And the conservative movement can clear the deadwood out of the way, and start to rebuild itself into a credible force."

Now I don't know which part of the Reagan coalition is "deadwood", but it seems pretty obvious that many Republicans are sick and tired of it.

One of the things I think defines Obama as a statesman and not a party creature, is his selective bipartisanship: his willingness to work with some Republicans. This seems to translate a desire to reform not just his own party, but also to nudge along reform in the rival party. American democracy cannot heal if the Republican Party, which is destined to be in power again someday, does not also heal.

So even if the Democrats win big this year, the infighting in and ultimate realignment of the Republican Party are to be watched. The survival of American democracy partly depends on the choice the GOP makes - and ultimately must make - between its small-government-conservative and xenophobic-authoritarian constituencies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Before the War on Terror, there was the War on Drugs...
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Oct 8, 2008 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that is why the prison population is so racially skewed - harsh prison sentences for black and latino drug offenders (and for poor whites), and light slaps on the wrist for anyone who can afford a top notch lawyer, or who has enough political clout to get the DA to drop charges.

That's why Republicans support the harshest drug laws, while also bending over backwards for the really dangerous drug dealers, i.e. Big Pharma, Big Tobacco and Big Booze, who together kill about a hundred times as many people per year as does all illicit drug use combined.

Will this change? How many of the Baby Boomer's pension funds are invested in the military industrial complex? Well, let's play this game, using a big pension fund manager, State Street Corporation, as our example.

State Street is the world's biggest pension fund manager. They invest those funds (in their name) in some of the most prominent corporate members of the military industrial complex:

Lockheed Martin: $7.4 billion
United Tech: $6.3 billion
Northrup Grumman: $2.2. billion
Halliburton: $2.0 billion
Boeing: $2.0 billion
Raytheon: $600 million

Those military contractors have made quite a bit of money off of the Iraq war, which has also greatly benefited the major oil & nuclear corporations, in which State Street also invests pension funds:

Exxon: $15.7 billion
Chevron: $8.8 billion
General Electric: $8.3 billion
ConocoP: $4.9 billion

Not only that, State Street is heavily invested in financial institutions that are threatened by the economic collapse:

Bank of America: $4.0 billion
Wells Fargo: $2.8 billion

And, yes, Big Pharma:

Pfizer: $4.0 billion

Let's not forget big media:

Disney (ABC): $2.2 billion

So, are the baby boomers likely to go to their pension funds and demand that they withdraw all their investments from the military-industrial complex, and instead invest in renewable energy and clean technology?

These technologies are not going to be as profitable. No one will be able to drive up the price of solar and wind power by forming an OPEC-style cartel, for example. Instead, return on investment will likely be around 5% - horrors!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE CANNOT SUSTAIN OUR ECONOMY SUPPORTING 761 BASES + wars
Posted by: cori on Oct 8, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what 2 conservatives said about McCain on Bill Moyers, The Journal on PBS several months ago

“It's often said that when Mickey Edwards speaks conservatives listen.”

“MATT WELCH: People forget this, but in 1999 and 2000, when McCain was running against George Bush, he was the neoconservative candidate. You know, four years before the doctrine of preemptive war ever even occurred to Bush.”

If McCain gets in, we will in my opinion, be left on an economic ash heap and McCain being the NEO CON it will be spending and all kinds of wars as usual. McCain is a big fan of military spending and preemptive strikes. He is not what he apears to be.

5,000 tax credit for medical care?

We already pay over ten and

that's if you have job

and where is that money going to come from?

borrowed of course.

And will he get rid of the huge tax cuts for the rich and corporations. He said no.

All we have to do is raise the caps on Social Security which the economist Dean Baker already said it's solvent until 2040 but McCain let us know we shouldn't count on it.

McCain is a NEO CON like Bush and Rove and Chaney.

Want to get screwed more vote for McCain.

Obama is not perfect but he's more a man for the people then McCain is.
And one more thing. Privatization is when they take our tax dollars and give them to private corporations without any regulation and oversight. That's what McCain wants more of.

Now our prisons are privatized and are a growth industry sucking billions of our tax dollars along with everything else. Connect the dots and it spells economic disaster. They call themselevs Republicans but they have out spent any Democrat ever, they have taken away our civil liberties and spy on alll of us. They want to privatize our water, the IRS and anything they can if it means they can tax our tax dollars without any interference from congress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ACORN at it again
Posted by: Romans1 on Oct 8, 2008 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Published - Oct 08 2008 09:12PM EDT | AP
By BILL DRAPER - Associated Press Writer
Officials in Missouri, a hard-fought jewel in the presidential race, are sifting through possibly hundreds of questionable or duplicate voter-registration forms submitted by an advocacy group that has been accused of election fraud in other states.

Charlene Davis, co-director of the election board in Jackson County, where Kansas City is, said the fraudulent registration forms came from the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN. She said they were bogging down work Wednesday, the final day Missourians could register to vote.

"I don't even know the entire scope of it because registrations are coming in so heavy," Davis said. "We have identified about 100 duplicates, and probably 280 addresses that don't exist, people who have driver's license numbers that won't verify or Social Security numbers that won't verify. Some have no address at all."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ACORN at it again Posted by: dangerouslysane
Utter nonsense
Posted by: chaswick on Oct 9, 2008 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The world has changed a lot since FDR, Mr. Johnson, as you should well know. And Obama is no Roosevelt.

Both of the mainstream parties have been entirely co-opted by the military industrial congressional complex (MICC), which did not exist during FDRs time. And they are utterly beholden to corporate lobbyists -- witness the theft of an additional 700 billion dollars approved by both of the major party candidates.

As you know, this slide has occurred under both Democratic and Republican administrations over the past 30-40 years. In fact, wasn't it under Clinton that Glass-Steagall was repealed, leading pretty much directly to the current debacle?

Obama is a timid and obedient servant to corporate power. He has no new ideas, and can barely hold his own in a debate against an aging, utterly compromised war criminal and serial liar. He wants more nukes, more coal, no single payer, more imperial troops in Afghanistan, continued bases in Iraq, further provocation of Iran and Pakistan, and a unified Jerusalem under entirely Jewish control -- something even the Zionists have stopped asking for.

He has no plan to beef up trade unions, his health care plan is an unworkable sick joke (pun intended), he has nothing to say about the disenfranchisement of blacks and other minorities via the so-called war on drugs.

In short, he has neither imagination nor courage -- two qualities that FDR, for all his faults, had in spades.

And there is absolutely no way he is going to win by a landslide. He'll be lucky to win at all. But even if he did win by a landslide, he is so compromised already that what difference would it make? Embolden him? Embolden him to do what?

What a landslide would do at this point is tell the Democrats that their move to the right over the past decades was the *correct* thing to do, and that they now have a blank check to serve their corporate masters.

No, I'm afraid the best thing that could happen in America today is if as many people as possible show up for the elections and vote for third party candidates. Only a serious rejection of the major parties by the public will make them rethink their commitment to serving their corporate paymasters.

And you, of all people, should understand that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]