Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Sarah Palin's Debate Performance Tanked Among Women

By Linda Hirshman, TheNation.com. Posted October 3, 2008.


Palin is a lot like a '90s "Rules Girl." She follows a playbook that men respond to -- one that gives women indigestion.
Advertisement

I have been feeling really guilty about not liking Sarah Palin. She's independent, her husband helps raise the kids, she's worked most of her life. I should luv her. But the minute she minced on stage in St. Louis Thursday, with her shoulder-length hair and stiletto heels, I realized why I don't: she's The Rules Girl.

Remember The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right, Ellen Fein's and Sherry Schneider's explosively controversial 1995 book that upended thirty years of feminist teaching about dating? Forget all that equality and intelligence stuff, The Rules advised. Who wants to be Hillary Clinton? Men are simple, attracted to sexual symbols and bright, shiny objects. If you want them, they argued, you must sport long hair and wear sexy, attention-getting clothes. The suit Palin wore for the debate was some amazingly iridescent material, and she sported an eye-popping sparkly rhinestone flag pin. The governor as the It Girl of the '90s singles scene.

As the capital-letter Rules recommend, Palin knows she must Never Leave the House Without Makeup. And, so far in this campaign, she has scrupulously followed The Rules for dealing with mainstream media suitors: Rarely Return Their Calls. Always End the Date First. Never Make a Date for Saturday Night After a Wednesday Date. Never Make a Date for Meet the Press At All.

Palin follows all The Rules most indigestible to feminists. Let Him Take the Lead ("Bush Doctrine? In what respect, Charlie?") and Never Tell Him What to Do or Try to Change Him (John McCain: "Governor Palin and I agree that you don't announce that you're going to attack another country." Palin: "Well, as Senator McCain is suggesting here, also, never would our administration get out there and show our cards to terrorists, in this case, to enemies and let them know what the game plan was, not when that could ultimately adversely affect a plan to keep America secure.")

The Rules provide a perfect model for GOP media prep. How a Rules Girl acts does not have to reflect what she really believes -- or even what she knows, so long as it's effective with the target audience. As with all such disconnected systems, a practitioner must keep The Rules nearby for reference. If you watch the video of Thursday's debate, you'll see that Palin constantly consulted her notecards. Fein and Schneider recommend keeping a copy of their book on the bedside table, hidden from view but close enough to consult if you're tempted to, for example, linger on a phone call with a boyfriend beyond the prescribed time.

The danger is, of course, when a situation arises for which the notecards do not have an answer. When Gwen Ifill asked a question Palin did not have a notecard answer for -- whether she agreed with Vice President Cheney's egregiously overreaching interpretation of the constitutional role of the vice president -- the answer was ladled up straight from the Palin linguistic smorgasbord:


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sarah palin, palin, vp debate, the rules

Linda R. Hirshman retired as the Allen/Berenson Distinguished Visiting Professor at Brandeis University. With almost no effort, she landed spot No. 77 on Bernard Goldberg's "100 People Who Are Screwing Up America."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WHY the hell do feminists feel bad about not liking Sarah Palin???
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 3, 2008 3:53 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Linda, please stop the guilt trips! I'm a proud feminist of color who LOATHES Sarah Palin and believes she has set the clock back at least ten years when it comes to women in politics. She is a sexist male's wet dream--brainless but cute and willing to be molded and used like a battering ram against other women.

I notice that it seems to be only WHITE feminists who are "suffering" this agony nonsense. Actually, I should say WHITE UPPER CLASS feminists--the same ones who played the Oppression Olympics when it was Hilary versus Barack. The rest of us "get it" and suffer no qualms at all. Perhaps because we understand QUALITY rather than image.

So what Palin's a working mom with a husband who stays at home with the kids. She's certainly not the first nor the last. She represents a party that has done everything possible to make working mothers (and fathers) lives harder, especially those who are from the working poor. This is a woman who doesn't see a problem making rape victims pay for rape test kits and who cut programs that would help disabled children (only to give birth to a child with Down's Syndrome).

Not every woman is going to support other women. This is a sad fact of life. Look at all the conservative women who endlessly rant about how feminism has "destroyed" America--the Ann Coulters, Laura Ingrahams, Michelle Malkins, Katie Roiphes, Beverly LaHayes--ALL have benefitted greatly from the strides women made in declaring and fighting for equality. It's time that we as feminists stop trying to accept those who make their bread and butter off of denigrating feminism and start putting our strength behind those who are willing to walk the walk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She didn't exactly run up the points
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 3, 2008 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with us men, either.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Surreal Amerika Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: Surreal Amerika Posted by: morticia
» RE: Surreal Amerika Posted by: ohb0b
Palin was extemely arrogant - And dimwitted
Posted by: jreal on Oct 4, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin was the annoying lady at the cocktail party - Or whatever party - but in Palin's case, probably a cocktail party... a cocktail party sponsered by BP, Exxon-Mobile, and Shell Oil.

She wouldn't stop with her incidious remarks. It's like, "what's your problem lady... Go home and kneel over your own toilet before you clog up my bathroom all night."

I was very surprised at how Biden contained himself like a proper gentlemen should. Instead of making her embarrassing scene worse, he just padded her back the whole time until they could leave the party.

She talked about bipartisanship, but all I remember from her was diviseness. To be serious about what I took away from her, I remember, "...Oh say it ain't so Joe." and...(Palin's head: "OK, what was that line Rove told me to use, OK wait a minute.. Oh!) "There's that white flag of surrender."

From Biden I remember facts.

I remember facts from Biden (like tax breaks for 95% of people) the contradiction and lies for Palin (Obama wants more taxes), and not much else from her, except for those steal your heart comments that was so obviousy scripted.

I mean come on, that last time we voted for someone because we liked the way they winked at us, we got Bush, and he gave us Wall Street Socialism.

From Palin I remember a drunken lady at the party that keeps everyone tense until she is finally escorted out of the building by her poor boyfriend/husband.

Some people say that maybe she would be nice to hang out with. Well just remember, she's the drunken, arrogant, and annoying lady at the cocktail party.

I praise Biden for keeping everything on the cool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why didn't the media notice Palin's most appalling display of stupidy during the debate?
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 4, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only one media person that I know of observed what my astute wife did when Palin started ticking off positive things after Gwen Iffil asked the governor what her negative attributes were.

"She doesn't know what an Achilles Heel" is!" my wife exclaimed in utter astonishment.

Not only did Miss Iffil miss it, but so did Chris Mathews, Rachel Maddow and Keith Obermann. Not surprisingly to me, however, Palin's ignorance didn't get past my favorite pundit, Bill Maher, who made the same observation as my wife on his Friday night HBO "Real Time" show.

If the media doesn't do a better job of spotlighting Sarah's incredible stupidity, she might, God forbid, end up our heartbeat-away commander-in-chief next year.

One more thing for NEW AlterNet visitors. If you are an undecided voter, learn the truth about Insane McCain and his so-called "heroic" war record by clicking on: Vote Against McCain (one of the HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Decent article - but just doesn't get it
Posted by: Jbuuty on Oct 4, 2008 1:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't profess to speak for women. I didn't even get a chance to see the debate. I hope that Palin seriously tanks any hope that McCain may have had of being elected.

However, the average person (including Americans, but not only Americans) is not excited by particular policy points and statistics. Obama achieved nearly 'mythical' status by offering a vision, a grand narrative if you will, not by outlining policy details. The Republicans have been successful by offering narrative - an inaccurate one intended primarily to illicit fear and loathing - but it has worked enough to get them into power.

Second point is that McCain/Palin do not have to win outright. They only need to keep it close enough to allow all the election-rigging activities of the Republican to remain sufficiently hidden from the general public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I must be weird
Posted by: leTerrassier on Oct 4, 2008 2:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because I'm a male and I don't find shiny objects attractive. I know the Rules say I do, but I just don't. I mean, my attraction to women in general is usually based around things like character, intelligence, personality, and, yes, looks, but never shiny things. I must be gay...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I must be weird Posted by: Shey
» RE: I must be weird Posted by: kungfuma
» RE: I must be weird Posted by: BST
Palin really knows how to play the game.
Posted by: countingdaisies on Oct 4, 2008 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All she has to do is wink, smile and repeat his name often and McCain thinks she's the greatest thing since his second wife. And what about her husband? Wouldn't most men walk around with a hard-on if they were always referred to as the first dude? When it comes time to vote, I hope all the men will be thinking with the right head.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Call Me Baby 1 (888) ......
Posted by: abemko on Oct 4, 2008 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. It was accurate but restrained. I thought I was the only one that noticed this kinky behavior, until I spoke to my brother-in-laws Brazilian wife and then my sister. "She was flirting with everyone", my sister in law gushed laughingly. "Wow, with her eyes and her lips and standing so close to Biden afterwards, she was being a hot babe on a hot date"! "Are you kidding," exclaimed my sister, "Palin was being hot from day one, she's the wet dream of the men of the Christian right, demur yet hinting at availability." She's one of those girls who attracted too much attention at too young an age and discovered that physical assets trump substance every time .... well almost, just until you really need that substance. Yep, McCain will surely expand her legislative portfolio so that she can really work Congress. Oh, notice how Cindy McCain is suddenly nowhere to be found.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Call Me Baby 1 (888) ......
Posted by: abemko on Oct 4, 2008 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. It was accurate but restrained. I thought I was the only one that noticed this kinky behavior, until I spoke to my brother-in-laws Brazilian wife and then my sister. "She was flirting with everyone", my sister in law gushed laughingly. "Wow, with her eyes and her lips and standing so close to Biden afterwards, she was being a hot babe on a hot date"! "Are you kidding," exclaimed my sister, "Palin was being hot from day one, she's the wet dream of the men of the Christian right, demur yet hinting at availability." She's one of those girls who attracted too much attention at too young an age and discovered that physical assets trump substance every time .... well almost, just until you really need that substance. Yep, McCain will surely expand her legislative portfolio so that she can really work Congress. Oh, notice how Cindy McCain is suddenly nowhere to be found.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kym525 is 100% right [ sorry I hit the wrong rating, thought #1 was best re-rate as #5
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Oct 4, 2008 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think everybody in here, both he guys and the girls, said it all about palin! why should feminists feel sorry for this piece of mooseshit that has not just set women back ten years, but more like 50 at least![ 1958 sounds about right? mrs. ward cleaver? hello?] and the fucking media, on ABC same old shit about how she did very well. just what those assholes said about mc jerko last friday night, when obama was the star player! I don't have cable, but I soon tuned into bridgeport CT's PBS ch. 49- where two women from the new york times, all the rest; said that biden won this debate! anyway, it's great to hear how eomen are wising up to this skank! by the way, that 'how to keep a man' book is a real joke! it reminded me of this columnist some years back at the danbury new times, karen ali; whom in her dating column every friday; was telling women the very same shit! just curious as to this woman's advice to never go " dutch" on dates really works. this being that . in a book called ' so you want to be a lesbian'; it was said that the main difference between women on dates with women is how they always go " dutch" on the first several dates! well at least I guess it taught sarah palin how to be submissive to HER MAN! or is that " her master"??? the lying, sneaky, crooked bastard better known as the DIS-HONORABLE SENATOR JOHN MC CAIN!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let me see if I've got this right
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Oct 4, 2008 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hirshman is lamenting the fact that both parties aren't bending over backwards to the maximum extent possible for "the woman vote"?

With a sense of bratty adolescent self-importance and entitlement like that, it's a bit of a stretch then for feminist types to always be going on about women's alleged "second class" citizenship. Boo-hoo!

The fact is Alaska has the highest ratio of men to women of any state, so it's not only natural but perfectly predictable that a very popular female politician there would appeal to men (in the general sense of the word) just like any man would, yet Hirshman sees this as some unforgivable crime.

Whereas, of course, a male candidate who appeals to women by following the male equivalent of "The Rules" is judged by an entirely different standard. Ok, I think I'm getting this.

As I've outlined before around here, when everyone is going for "the woman vote" and no one is going for "the man vote", the high demand for the former increases its cost, while the low demand for the latter decreases its cost, thus making it a plausibly wise strategy to eschew the former in favor of the latter.

Yes, women may be a majority of the electorate, but they tend to congregate in large, crowded metropolitan areas in populous states, where their voting effect is diluted by the way the electoral college works -- a factor of about two or three dilution is not atypical. What paints the nation's vote map red or blue is population density. The R's have perfected a strategy of getting the many low density states such as Alaska and Wyoming (1.1 and 5.1 people per square mile, respectively), which carry more electoral college weight per citizen, and which also happen to have more men than women because of the way the sexes distribute themselves geographically. The counties that Bush carried in 2004 are four times as large in area as Kerry’s counties were, and larger area generally means lower population density.

Believe me: nobody in rural areas - women included - much gives a whit about silly stuff like Hirshman's "thirty years of feminist teaching about dating", nor are they much impressed by Obama'a Harvard law degree and urbanity. Quite the contrary. Just like the city folks aren't much impressed by Palin's macho hunting abilities (-must have been Chapter 36 in "The Rules"), which no doubt explains why in more than a few she sets off the same creepy obsessive stalker behavior that someone like an Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin have endured for years.

About all this article proves is that, once again, the one characteristic which Palin has that is the most unforgivable sin of all, from the perspective of the Feminazi is that she is feminine. But don't anybody call that 'misogyny'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope, not really Posted by: iatsebean
Ignorance in Abundance
Posted by: progressivepatriot on Oct 4, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although she didn't fall flat on her face, Palin continued to show her ignorance. Her two favorite strategies: answer a question that wasn't asked or answer with a memorized sound-bite.

Go to www.thanksbutnothanks.com to view articles, editorials and videos telling the truth about Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ignorance in Abundance Posted by: anneliese-nyc
Did you see her on FAUX?
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 4, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved this priceless gotta watch show of blame everybody but me.

She is a master distracter. I'm so glad people are waking up to it and seeing through it. Whew!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gotta watch Posted by: kepstein7777
Non-Hillary?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Oct 4, 2008 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mmmmmmmmmmm...Shiny objects!

If I recall correctly, Hillary stuck pretty close to the "rules" during her campaign as well, at least as far as telling Middle America what she thought they wanted to hear, never committing to anything outside the parameters of the wishy-washy, DLC corporate agenda, and not trying to change the system.

And if "the voting-age population has been predominantly female...for decades", where exactly have they been the past 8+ years...playing hard to get with non-Republican candidates?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes. Posted by: Beck
» pant suits Posted by: wefearwhatwedontunderstand
cheerleader
Posted by: jon B on Oct 4, 2008 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found her debate style closer to a high school cheerleader. Every time she praised McCain I half expected she would pull out some pom poms from under the dais. And I quickly got tired of the folksy stuff like, "Gosh darn it," or "I'll betcha."

I was not a Clinton supporter (mostly because I had a no more Clinton/Bush presidents rule), but I could imagine Hillary as president, but never could I picture a President Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Folksy stuff Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Folksy stuff Posted by: jon B
» RE: cheerleader Posted by: orwellturns
» RE: cheerleader Posted by: anneliese-nyc
Excellent post!!! Palin also used the "T-word"...
Posted by: greentime on Oct 4, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
which is equally loathsome.

Oh yes, I mean "Tolerance", and how dare she or any of her fellow Christian hate mongers declare anyone to be less worthy of full human being status! These are veiled righteous behaviors that have historically permeated the racist, sexist and homophobic conservatives that have plagued the social development of this country since it's inception.

She represents the worst of the intolerant and uncompassionate conservatives that have proven to be so void of love and respect; qualities much more valuable than the divisive rant of backwards so-called and self proclaimed Christians.

We do not need to be vetted by a self-proclaimed bigot. Thank you Sarah, but no.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin missed a bet.
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Oct 4, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When she greeted Biden and asked if she could call him Joe, she should have straightened his necktie (even though it didn't need it). Give him that warm tingly feeling. :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Palin missed a bet. Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: "Only if you call me Joe Sixpack." Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: Palin missed a bet. Posted by: Joni50
I Despise Vapid, Stupid People
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Oct 4, 2008 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...regardless of gender. I despise Palin because she has no business running for vice president, and she knows it, but she is ambitious and unscrupulous and obviously doesn't give a rat's ass about what is good for the US. What is good for Sarah Palin is all she is interested in. In fact, it is painfully obvious that she's quite uninterested in the issues important to America, since she displays an incredible ignorance of those issues. I doubt the woman even reads a newspaper.

But I am sad that her stupidity is acceptable to so many people. If Palin were a man, she would not be running for vice president. But the GOP chose her as a way to lure votes away from Obama. They are using sex appeal and sexist tactics because, as I have said before, they have nothing else to sell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Despise Vapid, Stupid People Posted by: beautifulady2003
» I'm sayin' it IS so, Joe Posted by: wefearwhatwedontunderstand
Meow, hiss...
Posted by: BST on Oct 4, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, meow, here come the bristling feminists who love to tell tales of woe about how women lag behind -- and here comes a young, attractive, assertive woman giving it her all in a VP debate and, oh, she's ripped to shreds. How, well, catty -- like high school.

I am one of the aging feminists who fought for women's rights, helped start a women's health network, encouraged women to run for office and have always told me daughter she can do anything she sets he mind to. She is now a very successful, bright career woman, married, kind to her parents, friend to a million galpals and guypals, who wears Jimmy Chou shoes, has long hair, is gorgeous and knows how to flirt.

Once you let the genie of feminism out of the bottle, you cannot expect to script for a lifetime everything that the products of that decision do or say. As Ellen Goodman said in a wonderful column (and I paraphrase) -- women have as much right to be mediocre as men.

I do not want the GOP ticket nor Sarah Palin for VP. My opinion is that she's not got the background nor breadth of national/international knowledge for that challenge. But I like her grit, her assertiveness, even the fact that she accepted what would be a rough, tough assignment, running for VP. All you women who dislike her style ought to get out there and run for office yourselves.

You write she "minced on stage in St. Louis Thursday, with her shoulder-length hair and stiletto heels, I realized why I don't: she's The Rules Girl." Huh?

How totally reprehensible for women to judge other women by their hair, their heels.I saw her "stride" not mince. Remember, the women in comfortable sweat pants and not-so-coiffed hair are judged not so kindly, too, by numbers of the population.

Frankly, Ms. Hirshman, you sound a lot like the '70 rules girl -- disdain men, refuse to recognize that the genders do have differences, downplay the natural inclination to connect using a wink and be sure and talk behind the back of any of the girls who like lipstick and pink cheerleader skirts.

Sarah Palin is not at all the best choice for a VP candidate because, in my opinion, she lacks the know-how needed for that position and potential rise to President. But I refuse to join the chorus denigrating her as a woman who does not meet with feminist approval and will stick to the issues in assessing her.

I've come a long way, baby; it's too bad so many other women seem not to have. In fact, I'll bet you that Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton would find cordial common ground if they ever sat down over martinis. They're got similarities: Courage. Convictions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Meow, hiss... Posted by: kepstein7777
» Not Cattyness Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Meow, hiss... Posted by: JamieC
» RE: Meow, hiss... Posted by: BST
» Make that.... Posted by: morticia
» RE: Meow, hiss... Posted by: bluebirdella
» RE: Meow, hiss...Pt. 1 Posted by: munchkinpup
» RE: Meow, hiss...Pt. 2 Posted by: munchkinpup
» RE: Meow, hiss... Posted by: rinpochet
» RE: Meow, hiss... Posted by: VMRH
Palen and the Peter Principle
Posted by: Dallas Suz on Oct 4, 2008 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll start by saying I live in Texas where we have Hair Perry for governor. Now Hair Perry is a male Sarah Palen. Not too bright but perky and looks good in clothes.

When I looked at Sarah Palen the other night I expected at any moment she would after winking break forth with "Live from New York, it's Saturday Night!"

The way some stte governments are set up the governor doesn't need to be the brightest bulb on the tree. Just like Perry rose to the level of his mediocrity so too did Sarah.

We must ask ourselves what does the governor of Alaska do? Is it be instrumental in governing or is it to act as an extension of the tourist board/chamber of commerce? If the latter then Sarah Palen may well fill the position adequately. Having risen to the top of her mediocrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» poor Texas - first Bush, then Perry Posted by: wefearwhatwedontunderstand
Women are not fooled
Posted by: scheherezade on Oct 4, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neither conservative nor liberal women are fooled by this gibbering fool. Males, unfortunately, are not so discriminating.

McNasty's mistake was in misjudging how women understand gender politics.

I posit that for women, Palin's presence illustrates male domination's most ancient and destructive motif: elevation of a youthful, pretty, potential sex partner over more meritorious, experienced women.

This will resound with female voters, regardless of politics. I love watching Goody Buchanan, Goody Matalin, Goody Chavez and other Republican broodmares grit their teeth and attend to their assignment laundering the new mistress' laundry.

As the author suggests, they've dedicated decades to following 'rules' dictated by Mr. Man's dick-ego needs -- only to find themselves slapped back down to firstwife status in the end as dickbrain's little head rules the day.

Let us not forget the viciousness with which Hillary (decidedly not a 'rules' player) was treated by even so-called 'liberal' males. The obsession over her appearance, the need to belittle her sexually for being intelligent and strong.

The unfortunate fact of life is that if his dick's involved in any way, shape or form; male biology renders him incapable of thinking past said dick on any issue -- usually to the detriment of women (except the relative few at any one time he's hoping to mate with).

Now, male dick-think has finally succeeded in placing a beauty-queen idiot within reach of the White House.

Hopefully this will open many women's eyes -- and perhaps their pocketbooks, when it comes to supporting qualified female political candidates. Not to mention their voting choices.

Male rule over women will always limit female power to the Palins, the Clara Petaccis, the Eva Brauns. Only if and when women finally become tired enough of this to organize, will the ceiling have to come down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Women are not fooled Posted by: beautifulady2003
» RE: BST-Women are not fooled Posted by: munchkinpup
» RE: Women are not fooled Posted by: beautifulady2003
» RE: Women are not fooled Posted by: cdub
» RE: Women are not fooled Posted by: scheherezade
» your comment cracked me up Posted by: Grandma Crabby
The Anti-Hillary
Posted by: taxidriver on Oct 4, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans recognized the intrinsic appeal of having a woman on the ticket and chose an anti-Hillary. Palin is a conservative instead of liberal; unreflective instead of reflective; under-qualified instead of qualified; and non-threatening (to conservative men) instead of very threatening. (Think of all those Hillary nut-crackers, ha ha.)

Whereas Hillary is relentlessly intelligent with loads of political experience, Palin seems to be of mediocre intelligence but is "eager to learn." She doesn't threaten insecure men like Hillary did; older men want to "mentor" the winking lass from Wasilla.

I think women, better than men, recognize Palin for what she appears to be: a political opportunist who unashamedly uses feminine wiles to seduce men and her audience.

Women want to