Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Election 2008

Barack Obama's Team Believes He Can Win by a Landslide

By Tim Shipman, The Telegraph (UK). Posted October 1, 2008.


Obama's senior aides believe he is on course for a landslide victory over McCain and will comfortably exceed most current electoral vote projections.
Advertisement

Their optimism, which is said to be shared by the Democratic candidate himself, is based on information from private polling and on faith in the powerful political organization he has built in the key swing states.

Insiders say that Mr Obama's apparent calm through an unusually turbulent election season is because he believes that his strength among first time voters in several key states has been underestimated, both by the media and by the Republican Party.

Mr Obama has come under fire from within Democratic ranks over his message and his tactics. Critics say he has failed to connect with the blue-collar workers seen as crucial to winning the election, and too reluctant to make direct attacks on Mr McCain.

But his aides are convinced that he has a strong chance of winning no fewer than nine states won by George W.Bush in the closely contested 2000 election, including former Republican strongholds like North Carolina, Virginia and even Indiana, which have not voted Democrat for a generation.

David Axelrod, Obama's chief strategist, said last week that Obama had "a lot of opportunity" in states which Mr Bush won four years ago.

But in private briefings in Washington, a member of Mr Obama's inner circle of policy advisers went much further in spelling out why the campaign's working assumptions far exceed the expectations of independent observers.

"Public polling companies and the media have underestimated the scale of new Democratic voters registration in these states," the campaign official told a friend. "We're much stronger on the ground in Virginia and North Carolina than people realize. If we get out the vote this may not be close at all."

To win the presidency, Mr Obama must win 270 votes in the Electoral College, which awards votes to the winner of each state broadly in proportion to the size of the population.

Statewide surveys put the likely Electoral College result at a slender Obama win, 273-265. But his campaign staff believe they have a good chance of securing between 330 and 340 votes, and could win up to 364 votes, a landslide on the scale of Bill Clinton's wins.

The senior Obama advisor said that the Democratic nominee is confident of winning all the states held by John Kerry, the Democratic candidate four years ago, a total of 252 votes.

But his team believes he can also bank victories in Iowa, where he first emerged as a force in the campaign in January, and New Mexico, where Mr Kerry only lost by 20,000 votes in 2004. Those states would leave him just six votes short of outright victory.

Taking Colorado, as Mr Obama's team are very confident of doing, would put him over the top. Even winning the smaller state of Nevada, with its five electoral votes, would be enough to guarantee a 269-269 tie with Mr McCain. If that happens, the US Constitution would hand the decision over to the Democrat dominated US House of Representatives, which would presumably come down in Mr Obama's favor.

Most pollsters would regard those expectations as uncontroversial. But the Obama camp is also confident of winning Ohio and Virginia, which commentators believe are "toss up" states with the two candidates chances at 50/50.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, election 2008, majority, votes

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He'd fuckin' better win...
Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL on Oct 1, 2008 1:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...or this nation is dead in the water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's just this kind of thinking...
Posted by: huricane on Oct 1, 2008 2:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that allowed 2000 and 2004 to be stolen.

Sure, maybe the poll numbers are good, and the word from the street is good, but it's not going to matter a damn if the actual vote count is close enough that they can pull off a three-fer. And their best cover for that is reasonably close exit polling.

I hate to beat a dead horse again, but if the exit polls show 70/30 for Obama, a vote count showing 49.2/50.8 for the Dipstick and Lipstick ticket is going to raise a lot of difficult questions.

Nobody, and I do mean nobody, can afford to get complacent about any part of this campaign, right from the national tv buys to the local doorknocking. It's no exaggeration to say that the future of America will depend on this election, so the afterburners have to get lit up and stay lit right up till voting day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's just this kind of thinking... Posted by: Digital Gentleman
Landslide obstacles: Bigotry and the Judas Factor
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 1, 2008 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last week I watched Bill Clinton pimp for John McCain on the "View" TV show

Not surprisingly, he failed to attack McCain. Instead, Slick Willie damn near endorsed the senile senior citizen.

More recently, during another network interview, Clinton made a half-hearted criticism of McCain that Politico commentator Roger Simon called "quarter-hearted."

Simon then expressed the same opinion as mine: Bill wants Obama to lose the election so his wife can run again in 2012.

For AlterNet readers who have forgotten about the REAL President Clinton, he's a self-serving, womanizing, greedy bastard who pushed NAFTA and took $500,000 from the Arabs for a weekend's work lobbying for Dubai's takeover of our major seaports.

The slimy son of a bitch should crawl back to Hope, Arkansas, and hide under a rock where he belongs.

As for bigotry, some pundits believe Obama needs at least a 10-point lead in the polls to overcome Democratic and independent racists. Hopefully they will come to their senses before November 4th and realize that half black is better than 100% old.

One more thing for NEW AlterNet visitors. If you are an undecided voter, learn the truth about Old Man McCain and his so-called "heroic" war record) by clicking on: Vote Against McCain (one of the HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One break... Posted by: schiffer
Did I read this before?
Posted by: F-Abdolian on Oct 1, 2008 3:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it was right before 2004 election , that someone said the same thing!

Good luck folks, I hope you are right, but you are under-estimating the power of religious nut-cases, racists and the programmers of the voting machines :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Balance
Posted by: Shey on Oct 1, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's balance a pragmatic awareness of the ability of the American people to be petty, racist and just plain stupid, with the confident knowledge that Obama is the smartest candidate since JFK, running possibly the smartest campaign ever.

Don't stop working toward victory, remain alert to the dirty tricks for which the Republicans are famous, but please stay positive, as well. McCain's campaign has become a total train wreck, with Sarah Palin at the wheel.
There is real hope, this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Balance - AGREED! Posted by: blurider
» RE: Balance - AGREED! Posted by: michael1972
The author is another typical European who still thinks that a Blair/Clinton "Democrat" will win !
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 1, 2008 3:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me but America ain't no Europe. First of all, people are trained to vote with their emotions and after Obama threw his base under, he pretty much lost it all. Second, Europeans who think Democrats are any different from the GOP are the DUMB ones. I see that if I try to bring up 3rd parties, they're just as DUMB DUMB DUMB as the Democrats who keep blaming Nader and not themselves. I just happen to live in a swing state, VA, and I tried to convince myself to vote for Obama but vote after vote issue after issue, Obama FUCKING BLEW it. And if you Europeans think Obama's gonna bring peace, then you people out there are fucking DUMB DUMB DUMB !

P.S.: As a matter of fact, all US military bases all over the world must be removed since they're nothing but a waste of taxpayer money and other countries can take care of themselves. Chuck Baldwin, Constitutional candidate for President, couldn't have said it better that defense spending should be used for homeland only and not outside the country. If Germany or Saudi Arabia for example collapses, then let them collapse and rebuild themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Chuck Baldwin???????????!!!! Posted by: Carol Burns
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» Democrats Stink Posted by: vkobaya1
» For Another Point Of View Posted by: eskit
I believe he will win by a Landslide too for he is
Posted by: niliadis on Oct 1, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ssociated with Acorn.... but not with my vote!
and why you might ask..Let's get informed...
All Obama's associations: Google them! Wow scary?
Google Obama Ayers
Google Obama Khalid al-Mansour
Google Obama Donald Warden
Google Obama Mohammed Hasan Chandoo
Google Obama Rezko
Google Obama Saul Alinski
Google Obama Wright
Google Obama Khalidi
Google Obama Malcolm X
Google Obama Alwaleed bin Talal
Google Obama Farrakhan
Google Obama Woods Fund
Google Obama Red Party
Google Obama ACCORN
Do we need to know more? Risky Obama-thanks but no thanks...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fear Itself. Posted by: grindermonkey
Why McCain can win
Posted by: Julian on Oct 1, 2008 4:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has never really laid a glove on him. On the really critical issues Obama has clicked his heels and gone yessir. As Kerry did before him - and lost. And Gore before that. Fascist legislation? Not an issue. Ballot fraud? Not an issue. Signing statements? Not an issue. WMD lies? Not an issue. Blowing Plame's cover? Not an issue. 9-11 coverup? Not an issue. Massive list of indictable crimes? Not an issue. Monumental $700 billion gift to the wealthy thieves for trashing the economy? Not an issue - the political class, Obama included, have joined hands against the people to rescue the bankers who can then resume their life of larceny. The list of supposed non-issues goes on and on until there isn't an actual issue beyond style left. So it will go down to the wire - easily close enough for electoral fraud and the courts to do the rest. A further leakage may result because of the professional politicians’ closing of ranks with each other and with the thieving bankers - repelling more votes towards Nader and McKinney who really deserve people’s votes. There’s only a month left in which to try to recruit Obama to the side of the people and his class loyalties seem too strong for that. Hope I’m wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why McCain can win Posted by: 911FalseFlag
the 2008 election will be hacked like the last two
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 1, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot say it any better than Mr. Spoonamore. Spoonamore is a GOP member and a lifelong Republican, having worked on election campaigns with Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg. He also has 20 years worth of experience in encrypted and networked communications systems for banks, TV, telecommunications, EMS, Military and other uses.

please go to my website, www.911insidejob.net and watch him talk about how obvious and insidious the current electronic voting machine situation is. It is unbelievable that Obama supporters do not remember what happened to John Kerry four years ago. It is unbelievable that John Kerry did nothing about it. They're all complicit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT WITH MY VOTE!!!
Posted by: niliadis on Oct 1, 2008 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not with our vote!
interesting: scary!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3zzFwtctLQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3zzFwtctLQ
AND.....
Obama & Infanticide "When he was in the state senate, Barack Obama worked hard against a bill that would provide health care for a baby who survived an abortion…. This is called 'selective infanticide'.... There’s been a media cover-up on this…" -May 15, 2008The Catholic League has been getting many phone calls and e-mails regarding Sen. Obama’s support for infanticide. To read more about how, while in the Illinois state senate, Obama led the fight to deny medical care to infants born alive as a result of botched abortions and let them die unaided in hospital rooms, check out the links below:Mona Charen, National Review Online, 9-19-08: "Deniers for Obama"
The media is bias and like to put blinders on the American People and the weak of minds let thier minds be manipulated....Thanks but no Thanks on Risky Obama...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NOT WITH MY VOTE!!! Posted by: jedens
» GOP operative niliadis Posted by: leafsong1
There is no question in my mind.
Posted by: paula.c on Oct 1, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That the loathsome Republican Dirty Tricks team will try anything to win. And I sure hope the Obama team is prepared. However, let's not count our chicks until the eggs hatch on Election Day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An Obama Loss Could Mean Civil War
Posted by: salt-of-the-earth on Oct 1, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if he loses legitimately. Why would anybody want to vote for somebody who already has a death list started, and from his own church no less.

All he promises is "change." Does he promise to end the Patriot Act, to pull out hte troops, to do ANYTHING to save the country, other than his vage promises for "tax cuts?"

Change we can believe in? Meaning of course, believe in Barack? After all, he heals people, right?

Even some blacks are saying he is the antichrist. And he is threatening people now with arrest if they criticize him, and he's not even in power yet. What will happen when he's in power? Will it be death, torture, or will people just get beat up for criticizing him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An Obama Loss Could Mean Civil War Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: An Obama Loss Could Mean Civil War Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: An Obama Loss Could Mean Civil War Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» RE: An Obama Loss Could Mean Civil War Posted by: salt-of-the-earth
» Quotes and evidence Posted by: Beck
» Yeah! Bring it! Posted by: kimbari
Not so fast...
Posted by: BST on Oct 1, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain and Palin have an enormously good chance of sweeping Obama, so do not be complacent anyone. My statement is based on 50 years (since I was a young teen) of parsing every election that's come along, so I've gotten pretty good at it without the help of MSM nor polls nor good vibes from candidate camps. Do NOT underestimate the public for its ability to make poor decisions based on inconsequentials, a deficit of knowledge, information and commonsense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Exactly Why I Named My Blog, "Obama in a Landslide!"
Posted by: itzamirakul on Oct 1, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I went to the Obama website a few weeks ago, I opted to start a blog on which to make comments. I chose to name my blog, "Obama in a Landslide!" to point out the fact that in order to keep the GOP from stealing this election as they have done the last two, Obama must win by such large numbers that it is impossible to manipulate and steal. We must pass this thought on until it is instilled in every mind.

Give full attention to the financial crisis and the GOP WILL STEAL THE ELECTION WHILE YOU ARE DISTRACTED.

Give full attention to the election and the CORPORATE LOBBY and THEIR FRIENDS i.e. CROOKED POLITICIANS WILL STEAL THE ENTIRE U.S. TREASURY.

You've got to give full attention to BOTH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree....
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker on Oct 1, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with your overview of Clinton and his self-preserving kiss-up to the senile, makeup-plastered fool on national television...almost made me throw up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I agree....in reply to NoMcCainPalin Posted by: AnIndependentThinker
God help us...
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker on Oct 1, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if Obama does not win. I thought Cheney & Co. were bad, but McCheney and Scary Sarah scare the b'jesus out of me.

These two are even more of an economic, theocratic, fascist, unethical, fanatical, immoral, illogical, war-mongering, disillusioned and ill-informed wrecking crew; who will turn this country into a barren wasteland.

Given that the polls are so high in Obama's favor, one can assume that he should win the election; however, if for some reason McCheney and his ditzy side-kick pull the rug from under the American voters using the same cheat & steal tactics that were used in the past -- I think that the American people won't stand for it. There will be a massive uprising of epic proportions; and when this happens, this new society of liberal thinkers will show the repugnant party what a revolution really is.

No way, no how, No McCheney & Scary Sarah.

Obama/Biden '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its raining trolls
Posted by: SENILEBIKER on Oct 1, 2008 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow - that headline certainly shook the trolls out of their trees.

Let's get back to some simple facts.

1) All the tracking polls have Obama up by around 5 points or more, which is more than the MOE.

2) McSame is thrashing around like a fish on a line - I'm suspending my suspension because I have brokered a deal - ooops spoke too soon.

3) Voter registrations are through the roof in the "new" battleground states, and are overwhelmingly Dem or independent See stats for North Carolina. These folks are not being surveyed as the pollsters are not using voter registers in real time, but data bases that are older.

4) Palin is a walkimg train wreck when it comes to undecided voters - too fundy, too inexperienced and simply, when she opens her mouth - too stupid.

5) McSame is a continuation of Bush - its an easy sell, and Bush's approval ratings are sinking as i write this (Who would have thought that possible?)

Having said that, people shouldn't be complacent - there is the underlying racial effect, and lets be honest - the GOP has shown its ability and willingness to cook the books through Diebold, caging and other practices.

For the sake of the other 95% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION make sure that Obama's margin is so high that it can't be gamed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» BRILLIANT! Bless you Biker! Posted by: foreverhope
Over Confident
Posted by: vkobaya1 on Oct 1, 2008 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More than anyone, I would love to see Obama win 70-30% over McCain. But to assume that they can do that and therefore can afford to slack off and not hit McCain as hard as possible is a strategy about as foolish and dangerous as if Eisenhower had decided that the Allied mechanistic advantage were too great for the Germans and therefore we ought to stop producing tanks, airplanes and carriers so we don't hurt the German ego too much. Sometimes I think Obama is more afraid of hurting McCain than he is of losing. Or maybe he is afraid that if he wins by too great a margin the Republicans are going to call him an uppity, elitist N-----.

If he wins by a massive landslide that maybe the best thing ever to happen to this nation. But it ain't going to happen. The dirty tricks McCain has up his sleeve that he will use before November 4 are so revolting, that he truly deserves to lose with only 2 votes in the entire nation for him, his and Sarah Palin's.

You know by the last week of the campaign, the TV ads are going to be screaming that we don't want a N----- running this country and that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson would turn over in their graves if Obama wins. And by November, there will be billboards plastered all across America featuring that picture of Obama in native African dress that was brought to us care of the Clintons.

Additionally, the Republicans aren't going to give up their Diebold advantage or their disgusting efforts to disenfranchise any minority group that just might favor Obama. As we saw in Indiana, they didn't even mind disenfranchising elderly Catholic nuns. How many boxes of votes from Asian, African, Hispanic, Jewish and other minority communities will end up in the landfill instead of the election headquarters. How many of those minority communities will be intimidated with phone calls saying they will serve prison time if they vote.

And don't forget all those closet racists who don't mind voting for the Democrats as long as the candidate looks like them, but can't stand the idea of an African American occupying the White House, Oval Office and the bedroom where Lincoln slept. They even acknowledge that Obama is probably the smartest candidate to run for the office in many, many long years, more capable, more articulate, intelligent, trustworthy, loyal, courteous, kind, cheerful, obedient, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent, while McCain is the opposite. Yet, they'd rather have McCain as their president even though they acknowledge he is going to not only take the country into the toilet, but pull the handle.

Obama has to have at least a 20% advantage to overcome the Republican dirty tricks, voter fraud and racism.

There is an old, old, old saying that is extremely applicable. It says, "Don't count your chickens before they hatch."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Over Confident Posted by: SENILEBIKER
» RE: Over Confident Posted by: vkobaya1
» RE: Over Confident Posted by: radical53
Why would anyone vote for McCain?
Posted by: kmcd on Oct 1, 2008 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't get it -- ask yourself: has your net worth improved over the last 8 years? Because my sure hasn't -- and yet, McCain has voted 90% of the time in line with Bush and his policies.

So why would anyone vote for McCain?

Seriously -- how much debt do you want to rack up for our kids and grandchildren? How many wars do you want to start based on a pack of lies that end up killing thousands of our guys and bankrupting our economy? How much more do you want to trash our environment to build the coffers of the president's cronies?

I don't get it -- McCain voted 90% -- hell, 90% of the time in favor of Bush's policies. So what do we have for that? Every branch of the government has ballooned over the last 8 years. We have the highest deficits and trade deficits in our history. Unemployment is high; wages haven't increased; and cost of living (forget gas -- the cost of a loaf of bread and a gallon of milk is $4)continue to increase. One in 400 homes is in foreclosure. We're in a war that has cost us over 4,000 lives -- just those who have died in Iraq -- it doesn't count those who have died the minute they've left Iraq. We no longer have habeus corpus, our individual rights have been eroded and our state's rights are next to nil. We're torturing people as we speak. The Exeuctive Branch has more power in our history. The first 2 quarters of this year, the stock market dropped 14% -- historic proportions. We're bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- which was privatized by the Bush government; we're bailing out AIG (they've donated over $50,000 to McCain) to tune of $85B; we're bankrolling Bear Sterns; and we're now going to have a $700B bailout package. And McCain -- he was one of the original Keating Five -- remember the $125M (that was huge at the time) taxpayor bailout for the Savings & Loan industry in the early '90s (old Cindy and her pops invested $380M into one of Keatings shopping malls and No earmarks, McCain boondoggled 8 trips courtesy of his buddy Keating to "see" the mall). McCain voted against increasing the minimum wage 19x -- and he now says that he's for the Middle class? He was voted in 2007 by the Children's Defense Fund The Worst Senator for his voting record on children's issues - -and now he's the Family Values guy? He voted against the Marthin luther King holiday 4x -- and he's a friend of the African American community. He has been the poster boy for Deregulation -- and now he's the "regulator" ---

Are you KIDDING me?

Why would you vote for McCain? Are you just that stupid -- that racist -- that pathetic? Are you like Bush -- loyal to your convictions even when your convictions are wrong? Are you just such an angry person that you're willing to hurt yourself to hurt someone else?

If you were a "real" Republican, you should be spitting nails. Bush and McCainn don't believe in republican ideology -- they're Rove Republicans -- and look at the mess that we're in now.

Look at a man's most recent behavior, not just the behavior of 40 years ago -- I'll take Obama's 25+ years of experience over the last 25+ years of McCain -- ANY day of the week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One word: Racism Posted by: kimbari
I could steal the vote
Posted by: DrSuess on Oct 1, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a computer programmer, and I know that if you let me into the innards of the machines that I could steal the votes. I can think of 10 different ways to take it. One way is “flipping the votes” which supposedly happened in Arizona in 2004. People pressed Kerry and saw Bush come up on the screen. The schemes that you are talking about of running all the votes through one central computer and having someone sitting there “deciding” how to send the votes “on” is another scheme. I remember going to bed in 2004 thinking Kerry was the next president, and waking up the next morning to a Bush victory. I cannot remember how many people were upset by the victory- and who seriously thought about moving to Canada. The idea of sick old man McCain being elected and passing the presidency on to twinkle toes Palin terrifies me. (I am a woman- so I can say freely what I think of Palin. If you want to accuse me of sexism- go right ahead- I am a big girl- I can take it).

Obama has played the game by the rules by registering tens of thousands of new voters. But it won’t matter if one of my fellow computer programmers gets in between the vote counters and the voters. The Democrats really need to be watching the machines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I could steal the vote Posted by: SENILEBIKER
I'd be carefull
Posted by: andrushka on Oct 1, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if I were you! The elction is 4 weeks away. Americans have already shown how stupid some of them are, and the Republicans have been very crafty in the past in steeling by fraud two elections, particularly the 2004 one when GWB had already demonstrated his "presidential skills" What we cannot understand in Europe, is the Americans' capacity to elect such mediocre people It would seem, considering the number, that it should fairly easy to find someone knowledgeable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tell The Truth ! Posted by: Last Chance
Two words...October Surprise
Posted by: donnal on Oct 1, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An October surprise is coming...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» October Surprise ???!!! Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Two words...October Surprise Posted by: SkeeterVT1
» RE: Two words...October Surprise Posted by: Last Chance
Obama's Team Needs to watch the Spoonemore interview
Posted by: Phred42 on Oct 1, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the videos by
Greg Palast and Mark Crispin Miller

Before they get to excited

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hope....
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Oct 1, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sure hope he wins by a landslide! God help us all if McBush wins in November.

Jiff
Whats hiding on your PC?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I haven't heard anyone singing
Posted by: JohnJlws on Oct 1, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
November 5, 2008 the fat lady sings.

Early on in this deal Obama's campaign asked me for several things: walk for Obama, register voters for Obama, get out the vote for Obama, and contribute money to Obama's campaign.

Not a single time did Obama ask me for suggestions regarding his strategy. When I took on the job of volunteer I accepted this "job description."

As this campaign season me