Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Election 2008

Did Sarah Palin Really Say She Wouldn't Hire Blacks?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted September 25, 2008.


An explosive charge -- if true -- would cast serious doubts on Palin's fitness for the vice presidency.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Sarah Palin admittedly hasn't had much of a track record when it comes to acknowledging -- let alone promoting -- diversity during her short tenure as Alaska governor. She's on record with a terse utterance on hate crimes legislation and on cultural diversity. But Palin's skimpy track record and paucity of words on diversity is relatively tame compared to the far more damaging accusation that's making the rounds.

On April 29, 14 black leaders in Alaska, including prominent ministers, NAACP officials, and community activists, met with Palin to voice their complaint over minority hiring and job opportunities. During the meeting she allegedly said that she didn't have to hire any blacks. Even more damning, she purportedly said that she didn't intend to hire any.

Gwen Alexander, president of the African-American Historical Society of Alaska, initially reported Palin's quip. This charge is so racially incendiary that it sounded like yet another one of the legion of Palin urban legends that have fueled the cyber gossip mill from the moment Republican presidential contender John McCain put her on his ticket. The charge had to be confirmed or denied. If Governor Palin or any other public official flatly said that they had no intention to hire blacks, that would be politically unpardonable. And for a potential vice-president, it would and should be the kiss of death.

In a phone message to this writer, Megan Stapleton, a Palin spokesperson with the McCain-Palin campaign committee, vehemently denied that Palin ever said that she would not hire blacks. Sharon Leighow, communications spokesperson in the Alaska governor's office, also disputed the allegation. She said that Palin's press secretary was part African-American and that two of her senior advisors were Filipino and Korean.

Leighow was also adamant that Palin did not hire staff persons based on color, but solely on talent and skill. As she put it, "Governor Palin is totally color-blind."

But in a phone conversation, Gwen Alexander of the African-American Historical Society of Alaska stuck by her contention that Palin made the racially charged retort. She also charged that Palin did not support or even officially acknowledge the group's annual Juneteenth Commemoration.

June 19 is celebrated as the date of slave emancipation in Texas. Alaska is one of 13 states that has designated it an official holiday. Other Alaska governors have sent the traditional greetings and acknowledgements to the Society. Alexander says Palin snubbed the group.

The unofficial charge, then, is that Palin is insensitive to the state's African Americans, and that includes refusing to hire and appoint African Americans. That charge is hotly disputed by Palin's staff and they cite names and numbers to back it up. But apart from the veracity of the charge and the denial, Palin's statement that she's absolutely color-blind when it comes to hiring does set off warning bells.

The color-blind argument strikes at the heart of the continuing debate over what and how far public officials should go to insure that their staffs and their appointments truly represent the broadest diversity possible. Officials must make a concerted outreach effort to make that happen. A color-blind posture more often than not has been nothing but a convenient excuse not to seek out, hire or promote African Americans and other minorities in their administration, no matter how qualified.

Diversity is a major issue this election. It's implicit in Democratic rival Barack Obama's White House run. It's explicit in Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative initiative on the ballot in three states this November. Obama opposes it. McCain backs it, and so does Palin.

Palin's commitment to diversity is no small point in Alaska. According to the 2000 Census figures, blacks make up officially about 4 percent of the state population. But those who self-identify as at least part African-American bump up the percentage much higher. When American Indians, Aleuts, Eskimos, and Asians are taken together, minorities make up about one quarter of Alaska's population. This makes the state one of the most ethnically diverse in the nation. Diversity must be more than a word that an Alaska governor pays campaign lip service to and then ignores.

Palin's campaign and gubernatorial spokespersons say the charge that she is hostile to blacks and minorities is unfair. That may well be true. But according to those black leaders in Alaska who challenged Palin on her administration's minority hiring practices, the charge is much deserved.



Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election08, sarah palin

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2008! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why is Palin's alleged bigotry a big deal?
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 25, 2008 12:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To get rid of her prejudice, all she needs to do is go through another de-witching, laying-on-hands ceremony.

John McCain--OLD ideas, OLD solutions, OLD lobby connections
For more reasons why JM should not be president
of the United States, click on: Vote Against McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing new
Posted by: michael1972 on Sep 25, 2008 12:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all that's occurring in this country (economy in all), is this something blacks should be really concerned with?

As a black man I could care less, this is nothing new. As a people, blacks should focus on what they can do for themselves and how they can tackle more pressing issues that effects their environment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Disgust is Powerful Posted by: thinks4herself2008
» RE: Disgust is Powerful Posted by: weathered
» RE: Disgust is Powerful Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Disgust is Powerful Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Disgust is Powerful Posted by: munchkinpup
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: Lilykins
» Nothing new but offensive Posted by: Jest2007
» RE: Nothing new but offensive Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: woody26
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: eservicemich
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: michael1972
» RE: Nothing new Posted by: stanlow
"I Don't Do Black Guys" and "Sambo Beat the Bitch" mean racist to me.
Posted by: thinks4herself2008 on Sep 25, 2008 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Progressive Curmudgeon has already been covering Palin's racism. Check out these stories on his blog:

Sarah's Own Words: I Don't Do Black Guys.


Alaskans Speak in Frightened Whisper (So Sambo Beat the Bitch)


Sarah Palin and Me

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please Huey, SHUT UP!!! Posted by: Kym525
Like I said..What does she know about Our 'melting Pot'
Posted by: Purple Girl on Sep 25, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This womens experience with diverse cultures seems to be limitied to Whites and Indigenous Alaskans.
Having grown Up in a Lilly White area in MI- I know it is poss to live near people of other colors and cultures- but yet never interact with them. I had to go away to College to expereince Diversity first hand. then I had to move to SF to have interactions with OTHER Groups. So What is the democgraphics of Wasila, or all of Alaska?
My guess is that the 'Pin up Girl' (seen but never heard) has very little expereince with any diverse cultures- in fact I understand the One Non White community she did interact with - she screwed- Figuratively!
So her minority credentials are as lacking as her economic, Foreign relations, military oversight, her Social Conscience....
Sarah has not just proven herself a Crappy Nominee, she's proven herself to be a crappy Human Being!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

confirmation required
Posted by: mary-alias on Sep 25, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If she did in fact say those things then the people who heard her say them should put together a press release and sign it with all of their names.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's invoke the One Percent Doctrine
Posted by: brilliantatbreakfast on Sep 25, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's good enough for Cheney and other Republicans, it's good enough for us: If there's even a one percent chance that something is true, we proceed as if it were 100% true. So I say full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes: Palin refuses to hire black people. It's the truth, because it COULD be true.

See how easy that is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God damn racist America
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 25, 2008 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My newspaper today had a front page story that said because of the economic crisis we're in, Senator Obama has a "slight" lead over the Manchurian Candidate and his stupid hockey mom running mate.

"SLIGHT"?

If Barack were white, he would have a 25-point in the polls. Minimum.

God damn racist America. And that includes the Obama bashers on AlterNet (i.e. Karl.Ben) who are nothing but closet bigots.

God damn you all to HELL!

John McCain--OLD ideas, OLD solutions, OLD lobby connections
For more reasons why JM should not be president
of the United States, click on: Vote Against McCain
[reportedly the hottest anti-McCain site on the Web]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: God damn racist America Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: God damn racist America Posted by: Karl.Ben
» Hugh Scott...... Posted by: Karl.Ben
» BTW Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: BTW Posted by: babs
Palin is Pathetic
Posted by: kmcd on Sep 25, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The really pathetic thing is that even the Republicans don't know Palin.

She's twisted -- on every level -- she's twisted. She shouldn't be on the ticket and EVERY American should be upset that McCain was that reckless and disrespectful of the American people to pick a "new enlistee" and therefore putting our country in harms' way in the event of his demise. That's unconsionable -- and it's not patriotic.

Obama is the solution for the 21st century -- he's intelligent, well-educated -- he's a transformational leader and an extraordinary manager. He spent 12 years studying, practising and teaching Constitutional law; 8 years as state Senator of a district of over 750,000 and a US Senator of a state with 13 million and during that time he sponsored 131 bills including energy independence, ethics reform and nuclear proliferation.

Wake up America -- Palin is pathetic. McCain should be ashamed of himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way to fight against that meritocracy, Hutchinson ...
Posted by: johnshadows on Sep 25, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... this is just an affirmative action screed. It's this 'payback-for-slavery' mentality that has brought us such stars as Kwame Kilpatrick, Marion Barry and John Jefferson. It creates a sense of entitlement, that hustlers like the above have been only too willing to take advantage of.

There's enough wrong with Sarah Palin - you don't have to dwell in the mud of innuendo and hearsay that this article does. And merit should be the determining factor in a hire, not some potentially harmful 'commitment to diversity'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Affirmative Action Screed? Posted by: munchkinpup
Sarah may not like blacks but her pregnant daughter does
Posted by: nfamous on Sep 25, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VELIG92GDXw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

usterroristnation
Posted by: usterroristnation on Sep 25, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John SIDNEY McCain ?? Is this guy another schmuck ?? Enough is enough.... someone should tell him these days you have to be a COMPLETE PRICK to get elected as president of the United States ......... Monkey See Monkey Do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

African Americans blew their chance
Posted by: billwald on Sep 25, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
African Americans got their chance for gaining long term political power in 1964. African Americans could got get their act together and now, 44 years later, have become politically insignificant, being "out minoritied" by the Hispanics and main land Asians.

Personally, I'm voting for Obama because his election will put a stop to the "everybody hates us" complainers. It won't change anything substantial but maybe the press will start to ignore the complainers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The BIGGEST LOSERS in U.S. political history -- whether they win or not in November.
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 25, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Old Man McCain and Stupid Sarah

Enough said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

race
Posted by: 7 Levels on Sep 25, 2008 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michelle Malkin is already writing and posting articles about how MINORITIES are responsible for this mess. You still don't think that race is playing a part in this election ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has McCain suffered a minor stroke?
Posted by: foreverhope on Sep 25, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain has 'suspended' his campaign to fly back to Washington and save what from whom? His handlers know he can't keep up with Obama. And no matter what he does it isn't helping him. The repugs can't talk about deregulation. They are the ones that brought us here damn them.

McCain and the repuglican party are responsible for deregulating the banking industry which led to this multi-billion $$$$$$ bail out by tax payers. Now McCain wants to fly back to Washington to save us, that's ballsy if nothing else. They really do think we're idiots. He said the same about capturing bin Laden. He knows how to do it, just vote for him, give him my precious vote and swallow his bull-shit, he will show us. No matter he can't remember in the afternoon what his handlers told him in the morning. No wonder the polls are slip sliding away.

LOL! He wants to postpone the debate because, he says, he wants to focus on our economic collapse/crisis. It is mostly his party's fault, and an investigation or the appointment of a bi-partisan Congressional committee should hold hearings and an investigation should definately be called for, but AFTER the election.

Does McCain understand that as president he will have to deal with our economy (very VERY bad thanks to his repug party) every day, AS WELL as guiding us through not only our wars, but international relations over all, and about a billion other things all at the same time?

Cause if he wins (God help us, Jesus, Mary and Joseph protect us) that's just what he'll need to do. That's no shit. I've noticed something disconcerting. McCain's left eye lid is drooping. It could indicate a small stroke.

This election gets wackier every single day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's a lot we don't know about Palin.
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 25, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Her record in Alaska isn't too sterling. She's proven herself to be against eskimo rights,pro oil,and let's not forget a horrid mismanager of a town's wealth and a total sellout to women.
Why is she kept away from the press? She's not that bright. She believes she's the next 'Joan of Arc'. Back in the day,they killed Joan,is she saying she want that treatment? I think not. But a heavy hand behind tits and ass is still a heavy hand. The People would'nt stand for her in the VP spot if she ever gave a real interview. She'd be as exposed as a stripper and so just what kind of scum the system will dredge up to cram down our throats. If the media was'nt controlled...we'd have that interview. Instead we get smiles and waves. Big deal!! But then again that's how you win a beauty pagent. With the way elections are run, she probably thinks she's still in one. I agree we needed a woman in office for a while now but not one that's a female Stalin. But if it looks good enough,you can get the vote even if you're full of shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The principle of Equal Opportunity Under the Law works against racial profiling for gov't jobs.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Sep 25, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The color-blind argument strikes at the heart of the continuing debate over what and how far public officials should go to insure that their staffs and their appointments truly represent the broadest diversity possible. Officials must make a concerted outreach effort to make that happen. A color-blind posture more often than not has been nothing but a convenient excuse not to seek out, hire or promote African Americans and other minorities in their administration, no matter how qualified.

You can't discourage hiring based on a protected status; encouraging the hiring, promotions, appointments, etc. is a part of the same racist monster: the good ol' boy network.

Race is neither a qualifier nor a disqualifier for any job. Especially when it comes to taxpayer supported positions in a government of, by, and for the people, a person's skin color should be off the table when considering that person's credentials. What sort of Neanderthal in this day and age really thinks that racial profiling (the ideal candidate for this job will be __insert__favorite__shade__here__) for the purpose of filling a government job is a good thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lilly
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 25, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Readers of liberal blogs need to get out more because this particular variant of race prejudice is standard daily fare on conservative websites like townhall.com. It goes something like this: "Democrats are bigots. They support Civil Rights and Affirmative Action because these programs set blacks apart. It is more fair to treat everyone the same with no racial set-asides. Motivated by guilt because they are so prejudiced, liberals want to continue programs (like public assistance and WIC) in order to maintain a plantation society." Thus, when the black guy with a PhD in biochemistry or management or industrial psychology goes to a job interview, there being no mandate to hire any blacks at all, it is A-OK for him to be offered the job of janitor (which is exactly what used to happen pre-Civil Rights Act) because, the argument will go, that is the job for which he is best qualified. Reasons will be found.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin is Provincial
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 25, 2008 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin has spent her entire life since infancy in a very small, very remote town. She was briefly on the mainland to attend college (five colleges, actually) but none of them was in an urban area where she might have become comfortable with ethnic diversity. She did not travel abroad until the review-the-troops trip that was set up last year when she was obviously being groomed for higher office. She had no passport until last year. Who knows whether the gossip is true (Sambo beat the bitch, not hiring blacks) but Sarah Palin clearly does not present as a sophisticated woman, in any sense at all. The GOP is playing to the romantic notion that small town ethos carries moral superiority and that uneducated, untraveled people, running on instinct, will best lead our nation. It was fashionable in the 18th Century to believe the same thing---that the "Noble Savage" living in "a state of nature" was the wellspring of wisdom and moral guidance. Bush (Palin in pants) thought he could establish US-Russia policy by gazing into Putin's eyes. A Palin supporter said on TV that "any woman who can run a home can run the United States". Big frog in small puddle: has never seen the ocean, thinks puddle is the Atlantic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRIVIA--WHAT WAS MCCAIN'S PATHETIC GOOF IN 2008?
Posted by: HPipe on Sep 25, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If things keep going the way they are going-- Sarah Palin will be a triva question 25 years from now that very few people will be able to answer. That poor girl is stinking up the whole place.

It is sad that McCain has turned out to be a pathetic goof along side his pathetic goof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin "Punked"
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Sep 25, 2008 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If her comments are true, then people shouldn't vote for her. In today's crazy mosaic of American society, no one really knows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HO HUMMm.............., HO HUMMM...............
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 25, 2008 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bottom line is.............................you're (and I include myself ) nobodies, and she's the Governor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama a Muslim with terriorist ties?
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Sep 25, 2008 5:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An explosive charge -- if true -- would cast serious doubts on Obama's fitness for the presidency.

You race baiting prick.
Do you just make up shit as you go? Anyone can you know.
Are you that blinded by hate and fear of this woman?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing new but offensive
Posted by: Jest2007 on Sep 25, 2008 6:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin's attitude may be nothing new, but if elected to office as one step away from the president, this would be hugely problematic. We already have half the Supreme Court hostile to affirmative action. I may not be black but prejudice is unacceptable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Doesn't Like Moms Either
Posted by: Ethical1 on Sep 25, 2008 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today Moms Rising www.momsrising.org tried to deliver a letter to Sarah's campaign office with 12,000 signatures asking Sarah for her views on five issues of concern to working mothers.

They were turned away and told to mail the letter.

Visit the website to send a letter to PBS asking them to include these questions in the VP debate. I want to hear her answers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There might not be an election to argue about
Posted by: Shelley on Sep 25, 2008 8:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about it. This is the quietest and wierdest election I've experienced. When Palin was nominated I wondered what they were trying to distract us from and maybe the financial melt down is it. Bush says Iraq has WMD's and says we have to go to war - then oops! my bad. Then he says the economy is very strong and a week later we're in danger of failing. McCain was one of the Keating Five that gave us the S&L scandal - so suspending his campaign to help fix the finances is a waste and a huge insult to thinking Americans. It also signifies that either the election doesn't matter because he already won, or there won't be an election period. Why else would he be dancing around like the court jester while Obama bits his tongue and refuses to whip out the hammer? Personally, I'm voting third or fourth party. I know my vote will get tossed but no one said my only chooses were evil and more evil. There is always another choice.
slrbgood

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin's Bigotry
Posted by: MarshallB in Seattle on Sep 25, 2008 8:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not doubt the report, and it fits with all the other reasons why Palin-McCain would be bad for America and the world. However, the reporter easily could have gotten more than one source if there was a group of ministers and NAACP folks present. It is tenet of good journalism to have at least two sources for any "facts," especially if they are likely to be controversial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Specious
Posted by: jshubbub on Sep 26, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece appears to be the crusading liberal equivalent of Faux News' infamous "some say (insert specious incendiary charge here)." Faux News does it as thin cover for a blatantly partisan smear. Why is AlterNet doing it? Aren't we supposed to be better than the other guys? Isn't that why people should listen to us instead of them?

Honestly, we've got plenty of ammunition to use against McCain/Palin. We don't need questionable--and ultimately unverifiable--charges to make our case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Want this to stick? Find a 2nd source
Posted by: Beastly on Sep 26, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you can find one other person who can confirm the story, you've got a winner. There were 13 others in the group; if it's true then it shouldn't be hard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

boring with her
Posted by: memohot on Sep 27, 2008 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Realy is better to watch linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: boring with her Posted by: memohot
» RE: boring with her Posted by: memohot
she's a racist if you believe birds of a feather....
Posted by: tellthetruth on Sep 28, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flock together...People tend to be drawn to those with similar attitudes, beliefs, etc, and palin is no exception. I know from first hand experience that a certain member of palin's inner circle is a huge racist, I was constantly appalled at her language, she constantly referred to African American's using the "N" word, no matter the context of what she was saying. She knows she is lying when she makes a statement like "gov. palin is totally color-blind" as well as the statment on hiring based on skill -- everyone can see...painlin hires based on cronyism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So Palin's a racist typical white conservative cultural values
Posted by: soulgroove on Sep 30, 2008 5:46 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This election has bought out the racist side in both political parties a way that no campaign in the nearly 25 years I have voted in state,local and federal elections. When this campaign is over I now look at the Republican Party as the enemy of African- Americans, I used say to these things as shock value to throw my fellow debaters off balance. Now I mean it with all my heart, people like Palin hate African- Americans with all their heart and soul and to me there is no middle ground. I say we should treat the GOP like people who want to destroy us, this is a culture war and it should be fought by any means even with because it is the language that White Conservatives and their allies understand and have used and it's time we used their weapons to defend ourselves even it means the end of the United States as a Nation.

It is time we racially separated because White American values are socailly warped and we cannot get along with them in peace and brotherhood. It is White Amerikkkan Conservatives (and their minority allies) who started this culture war, it is time we as African- Americans fought back just like any other group who is in a war with an enemy, you don't offer them flowers or pleas of peace you use violence.

MLK'S Dream is over regardless if Obama wins or loses the Presidency

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement