ELECTION 2004  
comments_image -

The GOP Stampede

The conservatives don't play politics with real grassroots activism. Their top-down style and "buy the movement" approach is better suited for Astroturf – and this week, they're on the march.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Election 2004 headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Next week, the Republican Party's ground game will be out in full force. Bush strategist Karl Rove will unveil his "72-hour plan" to knock on the door of every last uncommitted voter in America leading up to the election. The strategy for the stretch-drive is unambiguous: red meat for the base, inclusiveness and security for the swing voters and making a mockery of Sen. Kerry. To get there, conservative leadership will mobilize their network of grassroots activists like never before, focusing on key battleground states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Missouri.

Commenting on the push, Arizona GOP chairman Bob Fannin told CNN this August that he hadn't seen anything like it in 40 years of Republican politics. "It's coordinated from the Republican National Committee and the Bush-Cheney campaign in a very, very aggressive way. ... We are right on top of it every week."

The drive to get out the Republican vote will be but one part of a genuine and dangerously effective conservative mass movement that has emerged in recent years. But there's a difference between the right's activism and that of the left. While most progressive movements tend to be organized spontaneously by activists in true bottom-up fashion, the right's grassroots are top-down, disciplined and hierarchical. Many of their ground troops have been professionally inflamed to the point that they've become another powerful media tool for conservative leadership. Beyond a base of dedicated activists within the evangelical community and some other true believers – an estimated 15 million of whom made it to the polls for Bush in 2000 – the right's populism is often a smoke-and-mirrors affair cultivated by GOP operatives, spread with today's easy activist tools and underwritten – sometimes indirectly – by the usual conservative donors.

This approach works. We saw it performed perfectly in Florida in the days after the contested 2000 presidential vote. Pro-Bush protesters marching in the streets of Florida convinced the Miami-Dade canvassing board to shut down its recount before the tally was completed, sending Gore v. Bush to the courts. According to the New York Times, the decision to halt the recount "followed a rapid campaign of public pressure." Republican telephone banks urged voters of all stripes to protest the process and conservative talk-radio hosts echoed the call. According to the Times, one Republican attorney used a bull horn to egg the crowds on, and the gathering protesters became violent, at one point even assaulting a Democratic board member.

Where natural passions seemed inadequate in the Florida mess, an image of popular protest was manufactured by the GOP. The truth would emerge, but only after the first impression of popular unrest had been made. As the Wall Street Journal would report several days later, "Some of the unruly pro-Bush demonstrators who kicked doors and banged on windows of [the] Miami-Dade County election office last week were Capitol Hill aides whose travel expenses are being paid by the Bush campaign." They included staffers of House Majority Leader Tom Delay and Trent Lott. In one photo of a crowd of "angry voters" can be seen an equally angry John Bolton, who became Bush's neoconservative undersecretary of state for arms control. While the media eventually picked up on the artifice, the GOP had successfully constructed the charge – widely repeated – that Vice President Gore was challenging the democratic will of the majority. That's an important point. The emergence of a right wing "grassroots" movement has coincided with the rise of a conservative media that amplifies and reinforces its message.

After all, it may be difficult to spur people to mass action based on the "old right's" promises of deregulation and privatization, but as long as there's a wide belief that the left – with its "activist judges" and positive stances toward women's reproductive rights and same-sex marriage – is trying to destroy America, an increasing number of hard-working folks will be willing to hit the streets – or at least shoot off an angry e-mail to the latest target of conservative anger.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2004 headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
"Emotions": Santorum's Sexist Explanation for Why Women Shouldn't be on the Front Lines

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Taibbi: Mortgage Fraud Settlement is More Like a Bailout Than Justice

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Obama Caves to the Right, Will Announce "Compromise" on Contraception Coverage

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Go Hungry! Fat Cat New Hampshire Republicans Aim to Ban Lunch Breaks

By Steven D | Booman Tribune

 
 
Employers Have Had to Provide Birth Control Coverage Since 2000

By Joan McCarter | Daily Kos

 
 
Who Cares What The Bishops Think? Old Catholic Guys Do.

By Sara Robinson | Alternet

 
 
Coup in Maldives Threatens Ousted President Mohamed Nasheed, a Leading Voice for Island States Threatened by Global Warming

By Amy Goodman | Democracy Now!

 
 
Finally! Trader Joe's Signs on to Fair Food Agreement for Farm Workers

By Tara Lohan | AlterNet

 
 
The Inside Scoop on the Budding Romance Between Walmart and Monsanto

By Maria Tchijov | Food and Water Watch

 
 
North Carolina Considering Amendment That Would Roll Back the Rights of Both Gay and Straight Couples

By Jonathan Weiler | Independent Weekly

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]