Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
There Is a Difference
Also in Election 2004
How Bush Won
Mark Danner
Not Your Grandfather's Anti-Semitism
Tony Judt
The Myth of the Exurban Voter
Ruy Teixeira
Back to Bush's Regularly Scheduled Problems
David Corn
My Holiday Gift List
Jim Hightower
Will the GOP Nuke the Constitution?
Arianna Huffington
Elected Democrats in Congress have overwhelmingly voted along their party's long-held platforms of social justice and equal rights for all during the past decade. It's a fiction that the Democrats have caved into the Republican agenda in Capitol Hill. But the sad fact is that millions of Democrats who pull the lever for their party's House or Senate candidate in their state no longer believe that their party stands for anything traditionally associated with Democratic values.
The lack of faith in the party is not surprising. After all, hasn't Ralph Nader made that his campaign theme in the last two elections? It's the one message that Nader really has managed to get into public debate, much to the chagrin of the Democratic Party.
The truth is, that with a little research into the voting records on Capitol Hill, the differences between the two parties are stark. Television and newspapers rarely break down votes on legislation by party. A Senate vote, say, of 70-30 is often described as "bipartisan" support. Yet if we look more closely we might discover that one party voted 100 percent in favor while the other voted 75 percent against.
Those willing to make this effort can track the party breakdown of voting by going to the House of Representatives Roll Call section. To get the breakdown in the Senate requires slightly more effort. For some unfathomable reason, the Senate's Roll Call section doesn't show you the total votes by party. You have to do that yourself by counting the votes of individual senators.
What does a little detective work reveal? There is a stark difference in the legislative records of the two political parties. Here's a sampling of some of the votes on key issues.
In June, Congress voted on whether to amend the USA Patriot Act to restrict authorities from acquiring information from libraries, bookstores and other businesses. A yes vote was a vote to approve the restriction. Some 93 percent of Democrats voted "yes"; 90 percent of Republicans voted "no". The amendment lost by one vote.
In July, Congress voted on a bill to transfer class action lawsuits from state courts to federal courts, a move that would significantly diminish the effectiveness of such suits. In the Senate, over 80 percent of Republicans voted for the bill; over 80 percent of Democrats voted against it.
In July, Congress voted on whether to approve a Constitutional amendment that prohibits same sex marriage. A cloture vote was involved. Almost 90 percent of Republicans in the Senate voted to approve the bill; over 90 percent of Democrats voted against it.
Earlier this summer, Congress voted on a bill to uncouple tax policy from spending policy. It would alter the "pay-as-you-go" procedures adopted by Congress in the early 1990s by imposing spending controls on government without taking into account either tax decreases or tax increases. As the White House described the bill, "This proposal recognizes that spending is the problem. Tax increases could not be used to offset mandatory spending under this proposal. And it would not subject tax relief legislation to pay-as-you-go procedures." In the House, almost 65 percent of Republicans voted for the bill; 95 percent of Democrats voted against it.
David Morris is Vice President of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and answers policy and election questions at Ask Dr. Dave.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Election 2004! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
How to Make Marriage More Than an Arrangement of Love-less, Sexless, Domestic Drudgery Sex and Relationships: Marriage was designed way back when life expectancy was a couple of decades. Now we're living four times that long. By Vanessa Richmond, The Tyee. July 10, 2009. |
Does a Senior Obama Official Have Unseemly Ties to Notorious Human Rights Abuser Chevron? World: The story of this slick oil company's romance with the government has recently taken a crude twist. By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. July 10, 2009. |
What Kind of "Hope" Is Obama Offering to Latin American Countries Still Traumatized by U.S. Empire? World: Throughout the Americas, there exists a powerful political tradition in which esperanza (hope) is defined by the fight against U.S. domination. By Roberto Lovato, AlterNet. July 10, 2009. |