ELECTION 2004  
comments_image -

Mr. Smith Learns a Lesson

Do 'self-made men' really achieve their success without the help of other people or government programs? If not, why would they deny public assistance to others?
March 16, 2004  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Editor's Note: Brian Bennett teaches economics and history at Sayville High School in Long Island, New York. A discussion with a conservative colleague inspired him to write the following, which he says generated a great deal of discussion among his students.

Mr. Smith says that he is a conservative because he works hard, and has achieved his success on his own. He wants to keep his hard-earned money, and not have it wasted by the government to support lazy people.

However, Mr. Smith is a public school teacher and a member of a union. He is paid with the tax dollars of many thousands of people, including those who never had children. The pay and benefits he enjoys are the result of a struggle by the many members of organized labor over many years. Many people throughout the world work just as hard as Mr. Smith, yet without the benefits of a union they do not enjoy good pay, benefits, or decent working conditions.

Mr. Smith is a graduate of both the public school system and a state university. Both institutions are supported by tax dollars that subsidized the cost of his education.

Mr. Smith is a homeowner, so he is allowed to take as a tax deduction the interest he pays on his mortgage. This saves him thousands of dollars a year, money that must be made up for by other taxpayers in order to fund government. Renters do not enjoy a deduction for their housing costs.

Mr. Smith's father was also a unionized public employee. The decent pay he received enabled Mr. Smith Jr. to grow up in a stable home, in a decent community, with good schools.

Finally, Mr. Smith's grandfather was a beneficiary of the GI Bill and government-subsidized home loans. These government programs lifted some members of the post-WWII generation into the middle class. This set in motion a positive chain of events from which Mr. Smith ultimately benefitted.

So, did Mr. Smith really achieve his success on his own, without the help of other people or government programs? If not, why would Mr. Smith deny similar assistance to people struggling with poverty today?

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2004 headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]