ELECTION 2004  
comments_image -

Mr. Smith Learns a Lesson

Do 'self-made men' really achieve their success without the help of other people or government programs? If not, why would they deny public assistance to others?
March 16, 2004  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Editor's Note: Brian Bennett teaches economics and history at Sayville High School in Long Island, New York. A discussion with a conservative colleague inspired him to write the following, which he says generated a great deal of discussion among his students.

Mr. Smith says that he is a conservative because he works hard, and has achieved his success on his own. He wants to keep his hard-earned money, and not have it wasted by the government to support lazy people.

However, Mr. Smith is a public school teacher and a member of a union. He is paid with the tax dollars of many thousands of people, including those who never had children. The pay and benefits he enjoys are the result of a struggle by the many members of organized labor over many years. Many people throughout the world work just as hard as Mr. Smith, yet without the benefits of a union they do not enjoy good pay, benefits, or decent working conditions.

Mr. Smith is a graduate of both the public school system and a state university. Both institutions are supported by tax dollars that subsidized the cost of his education.

Mr. Smith is a homeowner, so he is allowed to take as a tax deduction the interest he pays on his mortgage. This saves him thousands of dollars a year, money that must be made up for by other taxpayers in order to fund government. Renters do not enjoy a deduction for their housing costs.

Mr. Smith's father was also a unionized public employee. The decent pay he received enabled Mr. Smith Jr. to grow up in a stable home, in a decent community, with good schools.

Finally, Mr. Smith's grandfather was a beneficiary of the GI Bill and government-subsidized home loans. These government programs lifted some members of the post-WWII generation into the middle class. This set in motion a positive chain of events from which Mr. Smith ultimately benefitted.

So, did Mr. Smith really achieve his success on his own, without the help of other people or government programs? If not, why would Mr. Smith deny similar assistance to people struggling with poverty today?

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Election 2004 headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Occupy Protesters Mic-Check Palin During CPAC Speech

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Apple, Accustomed to Profits and Praise, Faces Outcry for Labor Practices at Chinese Factories

By Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez | Democracy Now!

 
 
Could Santorum Actually Beat Romney? And Would the Obama Campaign be Ready?

By Steve M. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Bill Moyers: The Economy Has Been Engineered to Screw Over Millennials (With an AlterNet Shoutout!)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Maher: Conservatives Are the Ones Dividing the Country

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
In Kansas, Is Catholic Church Trying to Destroy A Victim's Advocates Organization?

By Julie Cain | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Obama vs. the Concern Trolls on Nonsense "Religious Liberty" Issue

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
At CPAC, Santorum Surges Despite Idiotic Claims; Romney Poses as 'Severe' Conservative; Gingrich Makes War on GOP

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Wisconsin's Gov. Walker Appeals to CPAC Crowd for Help Fending Off Recall

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
In Birth Control Debate, Cable News Disproportionately Asked Men What They Thought of Women's Health

By Faiz Shakir and Adam Peck | Think Progress

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]