Election 2016

The Biggest Difference Between Hillary and Bernie? The Real Steps They Will Take to Address America's Inequality Crisis

Hillary has no burning desire to reverse runaway inequality by fundamentally reordering the economic system.

Public disclosure of financial documents indicate that in only 12 speeches given to private equity firms, Wall Street Banks, and other major global financial corporations- Hillary Clinton received $2,935,000 in payment from 2013 to 2015.
Photo Credit: The Free Thought Project

No one can deny that economic inequality is accelerating. In 1980 the average top 100 CEOs earned $45 for every dollar earned by an average worker. Today, the gap is an astounding $844 to 1.

But there is significant controversy about the impact of runaway inequality on American society and what should be done about it.

Inequality and Equal Opportunity

One narrative argues that inequality per se is not an essential problem as long as we have equality opportunity so that everyone has a fair chance at accumulating these riches. People of all incomes, genders and colors should be able to line up together at the starting line. Each individual should be able to fully develop his or her god-given talents. No form of discrimination should be tolerated during this run for the gold.  

Within this narrative, economic inequality and its connection to Wall Street are important but not paramount. There are other issues that are equally, if not more important, like racial discrimination, unequal wages for women and discrimination against gays, lesbians and transgender people.

Runaway Inequality as the Key Issue

The alternative narrative argues that runaway inequality is ruining our way of life; that as the super-rich increase their wealth, the rest of us suffer. It argues that Wall Street and top CEOs are strip-mining our economy, by extracting more and more wealth from corporations, consumers, students and communities. Incomes for the wealthy are skyrocketed as real wages for the average workers stagnate.

As the rich grow richer and corporations grow more powerful, they move their money offshore. The tax burden is shifted to the rest of us as state and local governments lurch from one fiscal crises to the next. As a result the richest country in the history of the world, can't remove lead from its drinking water or provide healthcare for all, or move a quarter of its children above the poverty line.

Equal opportunity is not enough. Resources must be redistributed to eradicate poverty, which disproportionately impacts people of color. Runaway inequality must be reversed.

Why did Hillary take $11,000,000 in speaking fees?

Because she believes there's nothing fundamentally wrong with the process of runaway inequality. She believes in a world where each child should have the same opportunity she did to make it to the top of the economic pyramid. There's nothing fundamentally wrong with earning $225,000 per speech. She can take money from any hedge fund or corporation because she believes her fundamental values won't be swayed at all. She will still call for tighter regulations and marginally higher taxes on the wealthy

In this, she is being truthful to her worldview. She does not oppose the accumulation of great wealth. She does not believe her wealthy friends are harming society. On the contrary, they are good people who are funding good causes like the Clinton Foundation. All together these wealthy liberal elites, now including the wealthy Clintons, are striving to remove barriers to equal opportunity. She calls it the Breaking Every Barrier agenda.

Hillary has no burning desire to reverse runaway inequality by fundamentally reordering the economic system that is building the fortunes of her family and peers. For Hillary it's all about values and equal opportunity, not just money.

Why Bernie Is Different

For the Sanders campaign, equal opportunity is not good enough. It is not enough to run a fairer race for riches when the entire process of runaway inequality is harmful to working people and the poor. It does not matter whether the super-rich are nice people or have good values or donate to good causes.

It is not good enough for there to be more women and people of color in the billionaire class. That class has far too much money and that money is needed to fund free higher education, universal health care and rebuilding our infrastructure.

Taking money from the super-rich for political campaigns is out of the question for anyone who wants to reverse runaway inequality. There are no big speaking fees for Sanders or damaging transcripts yet to be released. Instead he must draw a clean line drawn between the billionaire class and the rest of us: between the economic predators and the prey.  

For Sanders, runaway inequality is not a single issue. It is the core issue that shapes our entire society. People are poor not because they don't have the skills to move up the economic ladder. They are poor because the billionaire class uses all its economic muscle  to financially strip-mine the economy by reducing wages and benefits and shipping jobs abroad. It's not about equal opportunity. It's about power and money.

The Class Divide

As the results from more and more primaries come in, we are likely to see this split emerge among voters. Those who are benefiting from runaway inequality—the economic winners—will go for Clinton. This group goes far beyond the billionaire class. It also includes local real estate developers and builders, upwardly mobile politicians and staff, prosperous lobbyists and well-paid non-profit executive directors, liberal bankers and hedge fund managers, and well-paid pundits and economists. They are all doing well. Yes, they want to help the poor and the middle class, but not by upsetting the hierarchy that rewards them. These are Hillary's people.

Sanders is likely to do well with working people, the poor and the young, those who are far removed from the race to the top. One test of this divide is whether or not it shows up among people of color. Is there a significant class divide among black and Hispanic voters? Do lower income voters of color trend toward Bernie? If so, the movement to reverse runaway inequality is likely to grow increasingly powerful.  

Will it grow large enough to dethrone Hillary? We'll soon find out.  But the real question is how to help it flourish after November. It will take a mass movement, a sustainable political revolution, to reverse runaway inequality.

 

For more information on Runaway Inequality go to https://www.facebook.com/runawayinequality/

Stay Ahead of the Rest
Sign Up for AlterNet's Daily Newsletter
+ sign up for additional lists
[x]
Select additional lists by selecting the checkboxes below before clicking Subscribe:
Rights & Liberties
Education
Drugs
Economy
Environment
Labor
Food
World
Politics
Investigation
Personal Health
Water
Media