Election 2014  
comments_image Comments

Mitt Romney’s Team Is Stupid and Warmongering Enough to Try Military Action in Iran

Romney has surrounded himself with advisors who are committed to military action and regime change against Iran, the same people who brought us the Global War on Terror and the Iraq War.

To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest updates from TomDispatch.com here.

It’s the consensus among the pundits: foreign policy doesn’t matter in this presidential election.  They point to the ways Republican candidate Mitt Romney has more or less parroted President Barack Obama on just about everything other than  military spending and tough talk about another “ American century.”

The consensus is wrong. There is an issue that matters: Iran.

Don’t be fooled.  It’s not just campaign season braggadocio when Romney claims that he would be far tougher on Iran than the president by threatening “ a credible military option.”  He certainly is trying to appear tougher and stronger than Obama -- he of the drone wars, the “ kill list,” and Bin Laden’s offing -- but it’s no hollow threat.

The Republican nominee has  surrounded himself with advisors who are committed to military action and regime change against Iran, the same people who brought us the Global War on Terror and the Iraq War.  Along with their colleagues in hawkish think tanks, they have spent years priming the public to believe that Iran has an ongoing nuclear weapons program, making ludicrous claims about “crazy” mullahs nuking Israel and the United States, pooh-poohing diplomacy -- and getting ever shriller each time credible officials and analysts disagree.

Unlike with Iraq in 2002 and 2003, they have it easier today.  Then, they and their mentors had to go on a  sales roadshow, painting  pictures of phantom WMDs to build up support for an invasion.  Today, a large majority of Americans already believe that Iran is building nuclear weapons.

President Obama has helped push that snowball up the hill with  sanctions to undermine the regime,  covert and cyber warfare, and a  huge naval presence in the Persian Gulf. Iran has ratcheted up tensions via posturing military  maneuvers, while we have held  joint U.S.-Israeli exercises and "the  largest-ever multinational minesweeping exercise" there.  Our navies are facing off in a  dangerous dance.

Obama has essentially loaded the gun and cocked it.  But he has kept his finger off the trigger, pursuing diplomacy with the so-called  P5+1 talks and  rumoredfuture direct talks with the Iranians.  The problem is: Romney’s guys  want to shoot.

Unlike Iraq, Iran Would Be an Easy Sell

Remember those innocent days of 2002 and 2003, when the war in Afghanistan was still new and the Bush administration was trying to sell an invasion of Iraq?  I do.  I was  a Republican then, but I never quite bought the pitch.  I never felt the urgency, saw the al-Qaeda connection, or worried about phantom WMDs.  It just didn’t feel right.  But Iran today?  If I were still a Republican hawk, it would be “game on,” and I’d know I was not alone for three reasons.

First, even armchair strategists know that Iran has a lot of oil that is largely closed off to us.  It reputedly has the  fourth largest reserves on the planet.  It also has a long coastline on the  Persian Gulf, and it has the ability to shut the Strait of Hormuz, which would pinch off one of the  world’s major energy arteries.

Then there is the fact that Iran has a special place in American consciousness.  The Islamic Republic of Iran and the mullahs who run it have been a cultural enemy ever  since revolutionary students toppled our puppet regime there and stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979.  The country is a theocracy run by angry-looking men with long beards and funny outfits. It has  fundedHezbollah and Hamas.  Its crowds call us the “ Great Satan.” Its president denies the Holocaust and says  stuff about wiping Israel off the map.  Talk about a ready-made enemy. 

See more stories tagged with: