comments_image Comments

Multinationals Are Scheming to Build a 'Corporate Death Star' That Will Zap Democracy Across the Planet

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is all about putting the rights of investors and corporations above all other people.

Photo Credit:


I am sounding the alarm. Right now governments and the giant multinational corporations are engaged in writing a treaty that would overrule national laws that try to rein in what these giant corporations can do to us. This treaty will allow corporations to sue governments for “lost profits” if governments try to enforce environmental, health, labor and other laws. One “smoking gun” example that shows us what this treaty is about is an argument over whether to “carve out” special treatment for tobacco because it is so harmful, or give it the same protections that other corporations and their products are due to receive.

The Upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership

The upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) “trade” deal has been called the “corporate death star.” It is a NAFTA-on-steroids that goes so far beyond “trade” that it isn’t really about “trade” at all. TPP is about putting corporate and investor rights above the rights of regular people.

TPP is being negotiated with a rigged process, designed from the start to end really, really well for the giant, multinational corporations and the billionaires they front for. Multinational corporations are at the table. Government representatives hoping to end up with lucrative corporate payoffs are at the table. NOT at the table: labor groups, consumer groups, health groups, environmental groups, human rights groups, civil rights groups, democracy advocates, representatives of smaller, local, not-giant-multinational businesses, potential competitors of the already-at-the-top giants, or any other “stakeholder” group that could possibly oppose the corporate agenda.

The “Smoking Gun”

The “smoking gun” proving that TPP is about elevating corporate rights over the ability of governments to make their own laws comes from an attempt by tobacco companies to outlaw public-health anti-tobacco efforts as part of the treaty. Tobacco companies of course want the same protections other corporations and their products are receiving under this corporate-negotiated treaty.

The Vietnamese Thanh Nien News explains, in  US’s controversial TPP proposal is smoking gun for corporate agenda,

The US government has sought to include tobacco in a regional free-trade pact, which would enable tobacco companies to use trade rules to compromise government anti-smoking regulations.

The Thanh Nien News report explains that the giant corporations understand what this is about,

The US Chamber of Commerce and its allies said they are worried by the precedent set by specifically identifying tobacco regulations as an area where governments can take necessary measure to protect public health, Reuters news agency reported.

In a letter to [US Trade Representative] Froman, the business group said that could encourage other governments “to propose additional product-specific references,” which could be used to block a variety of US exports on health grounds.

Smoking gun: the giant corporate interests say if this treaty can “carve out” tobacco as too dangerous, this will encourage the peasants and their puny governments to fight for other rights as well.

Tobacco? Really?

It is hard for many of us to believe that there is a “treaty” being negotiated in such a way that tobacco companies can propose outlawing public-health efforts because they impede their profits! But it is happening. That this could be occurring at allillustrates the flawed process at work here; in these negotiations tobacco companies are at the table while public-health advocates are not at the table. Profits are at the table, the interests of human beings are not at the table.

The tobacco companies are upset that they might not get the same protections from governments that other corporations and their products are getting.

Tobacco “Carve Out”

A recent NY Times editorial misses the point,  The Hazard of Free-Trade Tobacco, making the case for “carving out” tobacco — but only tobacco, concluding,