ECONOMY  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 12

The Department of Labor in the Bush Years: A Damage Assessment

Under Bush, the Labor department has been stacked against workers' rights.
September 3, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
For millions of Americans there was little cause for celebration this past Labor Day. While workers' wages have fallen, the cost of living has skyrocketed, the unemployment rate has soared, fewer workers have health coverage, and good retirement plans are increasingly scarce.

Nearly a century ago, Congress established the federal Department of Labor to be the advocate and champion for working Americans. Specifically, the department was created to advance three core goals: "to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners of the United States, to improve their working conditions, and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment."

However, under the Bush Presidency, these goals -- and the interests of workers -- have been under direct assault.

From day one, Bush's Department of Labor has actively worked to undermine workers' rights to organize, to fair pay and decent benefits, and to safe working conditions -- rights that are essential to growing and sustaining a strong middle class. U.S. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao and other high-level appointees came to their posts determined to weaken the agency.

Under Chao's leadership, the department has repeatedly torpedoed rules designed to help workers. One of her first actions was supporting the repeal of a rule that would have protected workers against repetitive motion injuries, the leading cause of workplace injuries.

Chao went on to severely weaken the department's Wage and Hour Division -- which enforces overtime, minimum wage, and child labor laws. Wage theft has skyrocketed at the hands of this administration: An ongoing U.S. Government Accountability Office investigation has uncovered repeated cases where the agency refused to go after scofflaw employers who admittedly owed their workers back wages.

Chao also consistently refused to support increasing the minimum wage, allowing it to erode to its lowest value in fifty years. It wasn't until Democrats took over Congress in 2006 that the minimum wage was finally raised for the first time in ten years.

Time and again, Chao has proven her loyalty to a different constituency. She has expended boundless energy making sure unscrupulous employers have a ready supply of exploitable labor. Just recently the department proposed new regulations that will cut the prevailing wage rates for agricultural guest workers and make it easier for employers to hire cheaper, temporary guest workers from overseas instead of qualified, available American workers.

And while the administration dragged its feet to assist victims of Hurricane Katrina, it moved quickly to slash wages for Gulf Coast workers in the hurricane's aftermath.

After President Bush tapped a mine executive to lead the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration, the agency immediately set about withdrawing vital proposed health and safety rules. By the time a slew of mining accidents hit in 2006, nearly 200 staffers had been cut from the coal mine safety enforcement division alone -- a move that helped cripple the agency. When Congress finally acted in the wake of many tragic miner deaths, MSHA acted with little urgency to implement the law. More recently, when the House of Representatives passed additional much-needed mine safety protections, the administration threatened a veto.

It's the same story with Chao's U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Remarkably, the agency has not approved a single new health standard for workers in eight years, aside from one that was ordered by a court. Even in the face of solid scientific evidence documenting workplace dangers, Chao has turned a blind eye to growing health and safety risks.

Take, for example, the department's failure to address hazardous combustible dust. In 2006, the Chemical Safety Board -- an independent government agency that investigates industrial chemical accidents -- reported that a string of deadly explosions caused by combustible dust are a serious and preventable national problem. Although the CSB urged OSHA to quickly issue a new safety standard, Chao refused -- and continued to refuse even after a sugar dust explosion killed 13 workers last February.

The tragic results of the department's fatal failure to act continue to mount -- on crane and construction safety, popcorn lung disease, silica, beryllium and more. And in one of its most telling -- and insulting -- moves to date, the department is now rushing to enact last minute "secret rules" that would make it even harder for health and safety agencies to issue future protections for workers and that would jeopardize workers' retirement savings.

Our nation's workers, battered by unfair global competition, stagnant wages, declining benefits, and poor employer compliance with labor laws, deserve a Department of Labor that lives up to its name, led by individuals who believe in its mission.

A Secretary of Labor that actually fights to help and protect hard working Americans -- now that would be a reason to celebrate.
Congressman George Miller is a leading spokesman in Congress on education, labor, and the environment and has represented the 7th district of California since 1975.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email


Comments are closed-

Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor
Posted by: redbird30328 on Sep 3, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush administration has taken the more pragmatic and useful strategy of protecting the rights of consumers and the competitiveness of US industry from the taxes imposed by organized labor. Big labor will not be satisfied until American consumers cannot afford to pay for any products made in the US and there are no US-based companies left. But wait, wouldn't that mean there might be many less jobs available? Oh yeah, but that's a detail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: outlander55
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: outlander55
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: libertarianleft

Comments are closed-

Bobble, Fumble & Fail
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 3, 2008 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mail-order college degrees, executive orders as preemptive assaults or attempts at steering the debate or domination of every minute of every news cycle. In previous eras known as "Baffle 'em with Bullshit", the"Opacity in Government" campaign has been wildly successful for the Bush Crime Family. These thugs have given up even the appearance of dictation from the moral high ground. The fallback position will always be to stand their ground, however shaky that position may be. There will be guaranteed support from a proudly defiant and proudly ignorant base. Information, disseminated loudly and repeatedly is the true enemy of these misbegotten policies against the average American. The idea of corporate rule is based on lies and will not be surrendered voluntarily. But it needs to end NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Yawn ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 4, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, we know George ...

And your answer as to how not to let this happen again?

Investigations, prosecutions, impeachment ?

Sorry George, Dems like you just don't cut the mustard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor
Posted by: redbird30328 on Sep 3, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush administration has taken the more pragmatic and useful strategy of protecting the rights of consumers and the competitiveness of US industry from the taxes imposed by organized labor. Big labor will not be satisfied until American consumers cannot afford to pay for any products made in the US and there are no US-based companies left. But wait, wouldn't that mean there might be many less jobs available? Oh yeah, but that's a detail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: outlander55
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: outlander55
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: redbird30328
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Pragmatism from Dept. of Labor Posted by: libertarianleft

Comments are closed-

Bobble, Fumble & Fail
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 3, 2008 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mail-order college degrees, executive orders as preemptive assaults or attempts at steering the debate or domination of every minute of every news cycle. In previous eras known as "Baffle 'em with Bullshit", the"Opacity in Government" campaign has been wildly successful for the Bush Crime Family. These thugs have given up even the appearance of dictation from the moral high ground. The fallback position will always be to stand their ground, however shaky that position may be. There will be guaranteed support from a proudly defiant and proudly ignorant base. Information, disseminated loudly and repeatedly is the true enemy of these misbegotten policies against the average American. The idea of corporate rule is based on lies and will not be surrendered voluntarily. But it needs to end NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Yawn ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 4, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, we know George ...

And your answer as to how not to let this happen again?

Investigations, prosecutions, impeachment ?

Sorry George, Dems like you just don't cut the mustard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS