COMMENTS: 144
Credit Card Debt: This Popping Bubble Is Really Going to Hurt
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
Let me try a few words out on you: "Charge It," "Swipe It" and "Priceless."
You know exactly what I am talking about. We all have credit and debit cards. We all use them, and many of us keep our lives going because of them.
That is, until the bill becomes due.
The sad truth is that we are all complicit in our own economic servitude even if, at bottom, it's not our fault because we live in a consumption society, and don't feel we could live without them.
While many eyes are focusing on the housing meltdown and its hugely negative effect on an economy clearly moving into recession, few are paying attention to the next bubble expected to burst: credit cards. You would never know it by watching those slick VISA card ads on the Olympic TV broadcasts.
Combined with the subprime losses, such a credit card nightmare has the potential, experts say, of bringing down the entire financial system and global economy.
You and your credit card have become key players in the highly unstable financial crunch. Mortgage lender cupidity and bank credit card greed wedded to financial institution deregulation supported by both political parties, have been made manifestly worse by Bush administration support-the-rich policies. It has brought us to a brink not seen since just before the Great Depression.
While campaigning in Edinburg, Texas, in February, Barack Obama met with students at the University of Texas-Pan American. "Just be careful about those credit cards, all right? Don't eat out as much," he said. After the foreclosure crisis, he warned, "the credit cards are next in line."
The coupling of home equity debt and credit card debt has gone hand in glove for years. The homeowners at risk can no longer use their homes as ATM machines, thanks to their prior re-financings and equity loans, often used in the past to pay off their credit cards. Indeed, homeowners cashed out $1.2 trillion from their home equity from 2002 to 2007 to pay down credit card debts and to cover other costs of living, according to the public policy research organization Demos.
To compound the problem, fewer people are paying their credit card bills on time. And, to flip the old paradigm, more are using high-interest credit card cash to pay at least part of their mortgages instead of the other way around.
Younger people are being crushed by this debt burden as college students and new consumers. Emma Johnson of MSN Money reports that "Generation Y" is broke.
"The democratization of credit has really generated a competitive spending culture, and plastic has allowed for material goods not had in the previous generation," says Bob Manning, author of Credit Card Nation. "Most of us grew up in a home with just one or two bathrooms for the whole family, he points out; today, new homes usually have at least one bathroom per bedroom."That change has happened so fast," Manning says.
"This generation feels that somehow or another they're going to figure out some technological advancement that's going to get them out of their financial troubles and outsmart the market," says Manning, who served as adviser to the documentary In Debt We Trust. The documentary paints a picture of national financial crisis stemming from the personal-debt burden. (See InDebtWeTrust.com)
Happily, this issue is finally being addressed by Congress and the Federal Reserve Bank. When asked for comments, the public overloaded the Fed's website as the New York Times commented:
When the Federal Reserve asked for comments on its proposed rules on abusive credit card practices, an astonishing 56,000 poured in. Most were from outraged consumers. They told of interest rates skyrocketing when they paid an unrelated bill late. They complained of unwarranted late fees and pushed-up due dates. One Pennsylvania customer fumed: "I'm fed up with credit card company tricks that drive us deeper in debt."
This anguished deluge should send a clear message to leaders in Washington. The Federal Reserve should swiftly adopt its proposed rules against unfair or deceptive credit card practices. But the real burden to curb these abuses falls on Congress.
This discontent is being organized to press Congress to act by groups like the Consumer Federation of America and the Center for Responsible Lending. And Congress is listening:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Legislation aimed at curbing credit card billing practices that surprise borrowers with unexpected interest rate increases and fees was approved on Thursday by a U.S. House of Representatives committee.
The bill approved by Financial Services Committee mirrors Federal Reserve proposals that would effectively end double-cycle billing -- in which card companies reach back to prior billing cycles to help calculate the interest charged in the current cycle.
These reforms are a start but much more needs to be done because it's not just billing practices that is at issue -- it's high interest changes, deceptive marketing, and arbitrary rules. On top of that, there are other loans that need scrutiny including payday lenders and student loans. And of course our own addiction to shop until we drop.
Also, let us not forget that our credit card companies have been colonizing markets throughout the world. As the New York Times explained in a series on debt, "As the American blessing of credit cards became widespread, so did the American curse of debt."
Bear in mind the experience of another addicting industry -- tobacco. As they came under restraints in the US, they escalated their poison pushing worldwide.
Debt is a global issue and has to be treated as such.
Just as groups like NACA provide help to homeowners in distress, we need a major effort to help the victims of credit cards -- with practical assistance and political demands for regulation and relief.
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 12, 2008 12:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earn, save, be frugal, love family/friends, backpack, have fun and learn. Stop wasting money on too big houses, too big cars, too big meals.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I saw this happening two years ago
Posted by: akai ringo
» Hello Japan!
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Thanks for your kind words, Bobsayx!
Posted by: akai ringo
» RE: Great advice - I fear for those with unsecured debt
Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Great advice - I fear for those with unsecured debt
Posted by: Bobsays
» Haven't had one in years...
Posted by: cmaukonen
» RE: Haven't had one in years...
Posted by: needlefoot
» RE: I saw this happening two years ago
Posted by: phatkhat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lpatrice on Aug 12, 2008 2:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Banks are already lending less (article from MarketWatch)
Posted by: fanny666
» Why? What's so bad about being in debt? Paying it down is worse.
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Why? What's so bad about being in debt? Paying it down is worse.
Posted by: blitzmesser
» Illegally immigrate to wherever and say good bye debt
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Get Out While You Can, just be careful how you do it
Posted by: thealltheone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: culheath on Aug 12, 2008 4:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Why should people pay off their credit cards if the system is collapsing? SPEND SPEND SPEND!
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kegbot1 on Aug 12, 2008 4:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no debtors prisons and I have the feeling that a good credit rating is going be meaningless where we are going as a nation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Debtor Prison
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Debtor Prison
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Debtor Prison
Posted by: MJ Fields
» FEMA REX 84
Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: What if we all default at once?
Posted by: dayenta
» Great Idea
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Great Idea
Posted by: donnee
» Indeed but it may in involuntary
Posted by: kegbot1
» Convince the people who owe the IRS
Posted by: billwald
» Now you're onto the true path to fucking the system...
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 12, 2008 5:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Credit cause cause and will cause problems beyond the bankruptcy of millions of consumers.
They are an engine of the economy of excess.
Development and lifestyle decisions are made that never would have been justified by the actual earnings and productivity of the individual user of credit cards.
Thus there is a multiplier effect that will trigger inflation, as well as bankruptcy, as artificial demand outstrips supply, or, as in the case of housing, artificially generated supply outstripped demand.
Americans act as if they are well-to-do; most are not. The gap between action and realtiy is another factor in the cheapening of the dollar and the eventual collapse of the economy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: witchjug on Aug 12, 2008 5:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The whole concept of credit is backwards
Posted by: opmoc
» Why is it a joke?
Posted by: suprmark
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 12, 2008 5:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Free money is not to be sniffed at - providing you have the self discipline to take advantage.
Of course the banks threw all this money out realising that a large percentage of people don't have this self discipline and would be unable to pay if off after the intro.
They are then screwed with completely extortionate amounts of interest.
The same is happenning with mortgages and its the banks themsleves that have lost all self discipline by turning the entire financial system into a casino whilst those supposedly in control are on LSD not of the pounds shilling and pence variety.
But house prices were ridiculously overvalued and simply had to come down to affordable levels.
We will all go through a period of financial turmoil until proper regulations are reinstated and banks start again providing the services to people and businesses which they were originally intended to provide.
A large mortgage on an undervalued house in about 3 years time will be an extremely good deal - providing it is a traditional repayment mortgage on a level of interest close to the bank rate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 12, 2008 6:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I was going to do it, but I found a decent job at the last minute
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Saved by the bell, or enslaved?
Posted by: phoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JBravoEcho11 on Aug 12, 2008 6:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atheistcable on Aug 12, 2008 6:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All my adult life I've been keenly aware of how my taxes were wasted by this warring nation and how lenders didn't have to produce anything--just sit on their fat ass and make money from the money given to them by those who didn't know how to resist the advertisers. And I wasn't going to contribute to these pigs, these parasites. I never bought a diamond, never supported South African apartheid or Rev. Charles Taylor. Never smoked, never supported Sen. Jesse Helms. Never bought illegal drugs, never supported private armies in foreign countries. I'm a strong advocate of legalized drugs--all of them.
Somewhere I read that Benjamin Franklin said: Dump your purse into your head. So, when I spent money, it was for educational purposes. (Of course, I spent money for a small apartment, and a mostly vegetarian diet.) Reading took the place of a car, traveling the world, going to movies and watching TV. With a few exceptions, I ate at home, not in restaurants. I am a tight-fisted miser without depriving myself of the pleasures of life--provided by solid intellectuals through their books. I've had a library card and never paid a fine for an over-due book or magazine in the past 40 years.
I was always aware that we live in an overpopulated world and I asked myself why I should spend money for kids when we already have too many. Oh-h-h, the money one can save by not having kids--or a wife. Never went to church to support a liar, a thief and a sexual predator. It's utterly immoral to drop money into that collection plate.
Likewise, I never gave to charity. And that doesn't make me a mean, insensitive or bad person. When I see some Christian organization begging for money to feed starving children, the first thing used to do was to look at the population growth rate of that country. Lester Brown of the Worldwatch Institute had a good influence on me. I don't do that anymore because I already know that poverty and overpopulation go hand-in-hand. I'm a strong advocate of abortion--for all three trimesters. Abortion is up to the woman, to have one or more for whatever reason she has--it's none of my business. Abortion is good--not an evil necessity as some will lament.
What we need to do is to teach people to be materially conservative and to boycott the capitalists as much as possible. Boycotting the capitalists includes depriving them of children.
Those are skills I developed in my lifetime. If you're going to labor, produce something that's useful, not junk just so that you can pay the landlord. Buy a house, don't rent. When you live in your own home, you then have 4th Amendment rights. I think the book that made me the saddest was "Working" by Studs Turkel. Legalize prostitution--and then teach people how not to be slaves or prostitutes. Of course, most of work is legalized prostitution.
I've been unemployed most of my life. That's because since I didn't spend much money, I had no need to work all the time. That further deprived capitalists of the profit they could make from me, it deprived federal and local governments of "my share" of taxes, and more of my time went to me--not an employer.
I wish to give advice without having any experience as one who was in debt to lenders, but I think if you live very modestly, you can pay off that credit card--and then cut it into 8 little pieces. As a reminder, take those 8 pieces and mount them on cardboard, frame it and hang it on your wall--as a reminder that you are now a recovering credit-card addict.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Life Is For Living - Max Out a Credit Card - Get Yourself a Girlfriend and Discover The World
Posted by: opmoc
» You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: donl51
» RE: You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: phoolish
» RE: You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: kegbot1
» Globalism will make "living in a cheap economy" impossible here shortly
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Life Is For Living - Max Out a Credit Card - Get Yourself a Girlfriend and Discover The World
Posted by: kegbot1
» You can't go after next of kin, why do so many people think that?
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: You can't go after next of kin, why do so many people think that?
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: You can't go after next of kin, why do so many people think that?
Posted by: thealltheone
» That's called a joint account.
Posted by: blogbooks
» Agree with opmoc. You've done a good job so far, but to really fuck the system...
Posted by: blogbooks
» A Bit Self Righteous
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: A Bit Self Righteous? give it a rest!
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Never Had a Credit Card
Posted by: Carol Burns
» Had Credit Cards
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Had Credit Cards
Posted by: KiwiBR
» RE: Never Had a Credit Card
Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: Never Had a Credit Card
Posted by: Gracchus
» How can you be unemployed and not starve or be homeless?
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Aug 12, 2008 6:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An important corollary to free market theory is the axiom that the private sector is more suited to provide all programs and services including education, healthcare and social security. The private sector is an integral part of the market while government is outside its ambit and therefore tugs at the so-called “invisible hand” that guides the market to achieve a natural balance among competing forces and interests.
The problem with an economic and social system based on free market principles is that it is neither free nor just. In theory it may sound plausible but in practice it is very deceptive in that the government does play a major role in the economy but not to serve the public interest but to serve the interests of the wealthy and powerful elites promoting a growing gap between the rich and poor. America now consists of two classes of people, the recently deprived and the recently enriched.
Between 1973 and 2007, average workers wages dropped 10% while corporate profits increased 219%. In 2006, the richest 1% of Americans paid 22.8% tax rate based on adjusted gross income. The same group paid 28.9% in 1996. The new minimum wage is $6.55 but in 1968, the inflation-adjusted minimum wage was $9.86. People working at the minimum wage can no longer afford the bare necessities of life.
The fallacy that the private sector can perform these services more effectively and efficiently is that corporations have only one objective, and that is to maximize profits. Would you expect a management team reporting to its shareholders that it is curtailing profits to save the environment or pay workers a living wage?
There are a number of strategies for maximizing profits such as reducing the quality of the product or service, lowering wages, minimizing benefits, minimizing health and safety practices, avoiding implementing environmentally-friendly strategies and raising prices. Sound familiar?
For example, Wal-Mart is notorious for paying low wages and minimum benefits while earning huge profits for its shareholders. Oil companies are responsible for massive environmental damage when extracting oil. HMO’s and the insurance companies have devoted significant resources for developing strategies to minimize payouts to people with health plans. Then there are the 50 million people who can afford medical coverage. In the process of producing bottled water, Coca Cola has depleted and polluted aquifers while selling bottled water which is not better than tap water to its customers.
Each problem in itself has a very adverse impact on Americans but unless the underlying problem is addressed, profits will prevail over people.
http://www.stateofdarkness.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Give this man a Cigar!! He gets it!!
Posted by: yellow
» Bible Bingo!
Posted by: mcartri
» Great one
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 12, 2008 7:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Well, there are those doggy biscuit "bonus" points on them cards that keep people going.
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ronheri on Aug 12, 2008 7:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nancy Sinatra Explained It.
Posted by: mcartri
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Carol Burns on Aug 12, 2008 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, I do owe the federal government. I received an SBA Disaster Loan after a major hurricane. FEMA did the absolute minimum to help, and I was told that my family could qualify for a FEMA grant by applying for an SBA disaster loan. I did not qualify for the grant, even though my house was leaking like a sieve and my husband & I had NO INCOME! (He was a self-employed subcontractor). The SBA was prepared to offer me a larger amount than I took, with the provision that they attach a lien to my home! By the time the SBA got around to funding the loan (3 months after my application and six months after the hurricane), I was so desperate that I took the money. It's not a lot of money per month, but it is a financial burden, especially in these dark times. I was hoodwinked, but FEMA and the SBA will both tell you that they are independent agencies and are not working in cahoots. So, the credit card companies are not the only threat!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You can stop all unsolicited credit card offers
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wallisp on Aug 12, 2008 8:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk it up with your friends, neighbors, companions, its all up to you to fix it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Aug 12, 2008 8:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will no longer have credit. If it is not in the bank I won't spend it.
The mortgage issue compounded the credit card issue just as explained in the article until there was no way out. This should have been done long ago but I was one of those fools who believed a good credit rating was so important. It is not. So much for the Bank Hype.
When I took this step I had a good credit rating. I was not even behind in any payments, however I had been playing the "game" switching money from one card to another to keep up with payments that could no longer be supported by my income, which has declined with the recession. The bleeding had to stop.
Believe it or not...I feel relieved.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My one-two punch.
Posted by: ellie
» RE: My one-two punch.
Posted by: cherylholmes
» RE: My one-two punch.
Posted by: donl51
» Relief today but not later
Posted by: harpy
» RE: Relief today but not later
Posted by: PortlandLiberal
» Reelectnoone, you've saved yourself.
Posted by: mcartri
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Carol Burns on Aug 12, 2008 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Aug 12, 2008 8:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
try to negotiate with companies... companies flip loans to each other so that no one has the actual file to look at to help you re-fi... finally give up cause $$ stops at life necessities like food, rent, utilities, no not including cable bill or any type of phone...
companies write off debt, credit score in sewer...
5 years later here they come but now on a fixed disability income that is 1/2 of what you made, you try again to re-negotiate with the vultures... car is repoed long ago, you called them and sent them the keys...
bring on the lawyers suing you for twice the amount owed plus 'court costs'... you scrape up half and offer it... they refuse to reply and file suit anyway... but, cash the money order anyway...
you send them what you can but it's not enough and they sue you for additional back interest and any other ponzi scheme they can dream up... bill winds up 2-3 times what it was in the first place... try to garnish your meager disability payments and you are 100% disabled anyway...
you've downsized everything you can possibly downsize already and still can't make it... no agencies will help, the famous 'don't know what to tell you' answer...
now you're homeless and in a soup kitchen line... trust me, know someone that this happened to...
we are looking at things inside out... the debtor's prison is where we all live now...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: here's how it goes...
Posted by: atheistcable
» RE: here's how it goes...
Posted by: cherylholmes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JPHickey on Aug 12, 2008 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laws have probably changed, but I had defaulted on credit card debt well into the mid-five figures. My reasearch at that time indicated that if I did not pay one red cent, the debt would expire and be removed from my credit file after six years.
The trick was to be sure not to pay anything, or speak to anyone about this. Paying any small amount would have resulted in the resetting of the statue of limitations. I'm not sure that is the case today, you'd better check on it for yourselves.
As far as I'm concerned, when the big default in credit card an unsecured debt comes, if and when it comes, nothing will happen to anyone "guilty" of dropping out of "living up to your financial responsibilities". At that time, most will be in good company.
Even now, the U.S. can't afford to keep as many "criminals" as have been incarceratd. I wonder if they still bust petty pot smokers and put them in expensive often privately operated prisons? I do know that California already spends more on prisons than education (supposidly).
The economic system of the U.S. and apparently the "civilized world" lacks viability through and through. Really, how can we take this fraudulent system it too seriously? It's like a very bad joke. If you disagree, have I ever got a discounted derivitive for you! And rots of ruck to us all!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're not relieved of the debt after 2005
Posted by: harpy
» Yep, they own you peon #123-123-1234.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylholmes on Aug 12, 2008 10:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's likely already a bill in Congress that will do this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Owe Credit Cards? Lose Your Home
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: Many ways to have your home stolen
Posted by: phoolish
» Ha Ha, well, I figured out this game long ago.
Posted by: Smackback
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Newsguy on Aug 12, 2008 10:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Credit card interest was even tax deductible. The Republicans with the help of Democrats got rid of that benefit, and then in the last round of bankruptcy "reform" Republicans and some Democrats like Joe Biden helped make it much tougher on people overwhelmed with debt.
It is not all the fault of people who get into too much debt. It is way too often a hugely expensive medical crisis.
We need major reform of our economy, trade policy and health care reform to help people avoid massive debt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: symcokid on Aug 12, 2008 10:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 6399 on Aug 12, 2008 11:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lenders, including Visa et al, have the blessing of, and indeed, are encouraged by Congress to bring the American people to heel by way of total indebtedness.
Our Orwellian security apparatus has been constructed to ensure that each of you can be quickly located and efficiently imprisoned when you fail to pay your corporate masters precisely what you owe them.
Asking Congress to deal with this is like asking Halliburton and Lockheed to negotiate a truce in Iraq. I know all you warm and fuzzy folks who still think there is a peaceful solution to this will find what I'm about to say revolting, but . . .
Tens of thousands of worthless, parasitic American corporatists must be killed within the next 3-5 years if this country is to survive. They must be made an example of.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Congress is going to fix this? F'ing kidding, right?
Posted by: witchjug
» RE: Congress is going to fix this? F'ing kidding, right?
Posted by: 6399
» RE: Congress is going to fix this? F'ing kidding, right?
Posted by: kegbot1
» We the people don't have rights! Welcome to the new America
Posted by: Krain61
» Agreed, but it won't happen. Freedom and privacy are dead, this country won't survive with any...
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Aug 12, 2008 11:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The roots of stagnation, financialization and monopolization are not found in the 1970s but early after WWII. The sudden spurt of GDP growth after WWII was supported by the release of pent up demand during the highly productive war years and the failure to quickly demobilize the 12 million men and women in the US Armed Services which thus kept unemployment to a minimum. Trumans Federal Budget for FY 1950 was just over $42 billion with a full third of it directly committed to military spending and another 55% committed indirect spending military and security concerns. Only about 10% had no connection to military purposes. Thus, it was intense government spending, especially on the military, that provided the economic stimulus for the early post WWII US "economic miracle" rather than the dynamic of the private sector itself. It is interesting that the reduction of the top marginal income tax bracket from 90% to 70% was delayed until 1961 because of the large, necessary role played by military spending in stimulating and sustaining US capitalism.
Between 1957 and 1963, total non-farm employment grew by 4.3 million from 52.9 million to 57.2 million. Only 300,000 full time jobs of the 4.3 million job increase, or less than 8% were generated by non-farm private sector demand independant of government spending. Thus, the stagnation of the private sector job growth just as large tax cuts took place in the early 1960s, is evidence of late capitalism's chronic tendency toward stagnation despite fiscal policies and supply side stimulation of the private sector.
One reason was technology. Between 1947 and 1964, overall output levels and output per worker nearly doubled while the total number of production workers employed in the US manufacturing sector slightly declined. Thus, the growth of employment lagged well behind the growth of output and the GDP in general leading to a crisis of overproduction, growing unemployment and stagnant real wages. Eventually, industrial utilization capacity dropped sharply in the late 1960s from a peak of 90% in 1966 to about 72% in 1970. This led to a need for credit driven growth to clear inventories and sustain profit levels. Between 1945 and 1963, net private debt as a percentage of gross domestic product generated only by the private sector grew from 78% to 143%. It has been increasing steadily ever since that time.
Late capitalism, with its high average unemployment rates, slow post recession recoveries and low average annual rates GDP growth over the past thiry years, which have tended to fall to historic lows of well below 3%, signals the decline of US capitalism as a system.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Long Decline II.
Posted by: mnstra
» Good point about production. Technologically speaking, all manufactured goods are worthless.
Posted by: blogbooks
» We need a REAL ownership society
Posted by: jimbee
» RE: The Long Decline II.
Posted by: phoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Aug 12, 2008 12:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rcox on Aug 12, 2008 12:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Strongly agree. But the schools are owned by the same pigs as the rest of the country.
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Strongly agree. But the schools are owned by the same pigs as the rest of the country.
Posted by: atheistcable
» Well, give it a shot. I don't have the time or interest to research who owns our schools.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hovey on Aug 12, 2008 12:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well at least for the biggest abusers. This government/generation of leaders have the belief that not only is debt good but that it can go on forever. sigh....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 12, 2008 12:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 12, 2008 12:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Hudson is Kucinich's chief economic advisor. His stuff is worth reading. He thinks that we've reached a point where the level of debt is simply too large to ever be paid back. (not just personal debt, but public debt as well)
www.Michael-Hudson.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: jimbee
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: jimbee
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Aug 12, 2008 2:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Aug 12, 2008 2:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you owe credit card debt alone, you can declare bankruptcy and keep your house. The credit card companies have to eat some of their debt. If, on the other hand, you've swapped for a mortgage or second mortgage, they've got your house too.
Watch yourself out there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Aug 12, 2008 3:16 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something has got to give, you say. But if there's but a decade left before global warming changes everything, and about that before there's no more oil, and we're all screwed, why bother to be good and thrifty? Why not just live it up and when it all collapses, if we're still around we'll figure something out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Indeed, leadership starts at the top. Ours is corrupt, fat, unethical, and disgustingly selfish.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joaocleitao on Aug 12, 2008 3:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please visit our web site:
www.relocatenow.eu
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do you have a Plan B for your life?
Posted by: phoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Aug 12, 2008 4:10 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If society crumbles your debt will be meaningless. Better to have a few guns, a huge stockpile of food, and whatever else you can get by spending all of your available credit than it is to have no debt and some worthless paper money in a saving account.
If you really believe the doomsday prophecies you spout then the BEST advice would be to max out your credit cards, refinance your home (and build a smaller, cheaper one under someone else's name), take as many loans as possible etc. and buy REAL ASSETS (like guns, food, land, a home, gold, silver).
Seems to me that the only reason to pay back debt is because you expect the status quo to remain stable. There are no debtors prisons. If you don't pay and society crumbles, welp, looks like you just got a bunch of free shit.
"Society is about to crumble, pay down all your debt so the wealthy are in the most advantageous place possible to survive and continue to exploit humanity forever."
Good advice Alternet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's wrong with you people?
Posted by: Chaversteve
» Singularity? The Rapture of the Nerds? We'll see...n/t
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: What's wrong with you people?
Posted by: kegbot1
» Franklin D. Roosevelt took American's gold by force, that's your answer
Posted by: blogbooks
» FDR was right! He may have "stole the gold" but the rich tried to steal America's economic recovery!
Posted by: yellow
» Interesting.
Posted by: blogbooks
» It is important to see the present as history.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: akbirdwm on Aug 12, 2008 4:14 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Foreign nations own the U.S., technically speaking
Posted by: blogbooks
» They don't own us. They are lending us money to keep consuming and outsourcing jobs
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Aug 12, 2008 4:19 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How repulsive.
Store after store that I have never heard of but sounds vaguely exotic and no doubt sells ridiculously expensive shit. I couldn't help but think to myself, as I always do when confronted by such a disgustingly hedonistic scene, "who buys this shit?"
Most of them catered to women.
I'd say about 40% of those in the mall were foreigners, no doubt connected in some way to an embassy given the size of their entourages and apparent wealth.
I can't think of anything more repulsive to my instincts than the sanitary, white washed, supremely artificial, yuppy bubble-world of an American mall in a wealthy area.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metamind on Aug 12, 2008 7:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A number-based economic system forces us to "go abstract" in our decision-making process because numbers are always abstract.
This is the essential evil of the system. It's easy to justify doing evil when you are "living in your head."
Imagine a system which allocated resources on need rather than greed, on wisdom rather than desire, on peace, kindness and compassion rather than domination and control.
The problem is much larger than we think.
The idea of money itself is at the root of it.
The Bible says "the love of money is the root of much evil." What it doesn't say is that the essential nature of love is attention. That means that we love whatever we pay attention to and therefore we love money by even thinking about it.
Let's start thinking about loving our brothers and sisters in humanity. There is one family ... the human family ... and we need an economic system which prioritizes the health and well being of our family.
Blessings!
Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Money is a failed system
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 12, 2008 9:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IF A BANKER KNEW HOW TO MAKE MONEY HE WOULDN'T NEED YOURS.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Chaversteve on Aug 13, 2008 1:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm not Danny, but here are the numbers
Posted by: hilly7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fodder on Aug 13, 2008 11:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Aren't debit cards actually the solution?
Posted by: hilly7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 13, 2008 1:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a crap job, so yeah in that regard I am broke. The economy is shitty as ever so yeah, in that regard I am indirectly broke.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm "gen-y" and I'm not broke
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Aug 14, 2008 1:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not just one to criticize, until a few years ago I was wholly part of the problem. I still am in some ways.
Credit is bad but our whole system is based on a false calculation of wealth. A fractional banking system allows banks to loan out ten times more than they have in reserve. So they don't have what they lend you which you don't have either.
This false value put us into this housing market jam as well because many companies applied the debt from mortgages owed to them (brought about by risky lending practices) to their overall profit margin.
So what is money?
Are commerce and money the same?
If you borrowed money with no intention to return it (no matter what the small print says) shame on you.
There are so many people who are being fiscally responsible to themselves, their family, and the community and there are just as many assholes who steal from us all.
Many of those assholes are running our government.
We should all think about the impact we have on one another. Our contact is economic as well as physical and the more we help each other the easier it will be.
We do not have government, we do not have freedom, we do not have democracy, we have each other. All we have is community. The ability to care about the whole and organize individually is what will save us in the end.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilly7 on Aug 16, 2008 10:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When one has more money that one can possibly spend, or generations to come can spend, what is left to be desired? Power and control. Thing of it is is that before this is over, many will be broke, many will die, and even more will wish for death. Ask another question, when all this pops, what are many 401ks, CDs, Pension Plans and more are tied to? This all hasn't been by flaw, it has been thought out, every detail, every counter.
It is not just here on failing economy, it is a global happening, and it ain't by accident. While many watch whatever show, sports, and other distractions, we have been slowly processed for one world government. There is a seperation between haves and have-nots, and the weeding will continue. Hint, hard work or loyalty will not entitle one to the have status, they consider it a birth right. If people wait until they are being loaded on box cars (already prepared), for camps, segregated not by color, religion, or any of the divisions they teach us to divide ourselves, rather by ability to conform and output of work- it will be too late. That is closer than one might think.
To Muse is to think. Placing an A in front of the word changes it to opposite. It is time we quit being Amused and start Musing for ourselves. OR - We can just be a product.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: circanow on Aug 17, 2008 6:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sensible Consumer
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: qqNageli on Sep 7, 2008 7:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
blue or pink Ugg boots, casual or winter Ugg boots, Ugg Australia's got them all for
Discount UGG Boots
UGG
UGG Boots
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 12, 2008 12:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earn, save, be frugal, love family/friends, backpack, have fun and learn. Stop wasting money on too big houses, too big cars, too big meals.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I saw this happening two years ago
Posted by: akai ringo
» Hello Japan!
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Thanks for your kind words, Bobsayx!
Posted by: akai ringo
» RE: Great advice - I fear for those with unsecured debt
Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Great advice - I fear for those with unsecured debt
Posted by: Bobsays
» Haven't had one in years...
Posted by: cmaukonen
» RE: Haven't had one in years...
Posted by: needlefoot
» RE: I saw this happening two years ago
Posted by: phatkhat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lpatrice on Aug 12, 2008 2:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Banks are already lending less (article from MarketWatch)
Posted by: fanny666
» Why? What's so bad about being in debt? Paying it down is worse.
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Why? What's so bad about being in debt? Paying it down is worse.
Posted by: blitzmesser
» Illegally immigrate to wherever and say good bye debt
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Get Out While You Can, just be careful how you do it
Posted by: thealltheone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: culheath on Aug 12, 2008 4:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Why should people pay off their credit cards if the system is collapsing? SPEND SPEND SPEND!
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kegbot1 on Aug 12, 2008 4:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no debtors prisons and I have the feeling that a good credit rating is going be meaningless where we are going as a nation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Debtor Prison
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Debtor Prison
Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Debtor Prison
Posted by: MJ Fields
» FEMA REX 84
Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: What if we all default at once?
Posted by: dayenta
» Great Idea
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Great Idea
Posted by: donnee
» Indeed but it may in involuntary
Posted by: kegbot1
» Convince the people who owe the IRS
Posted by: billwald
» Now you're onto the true path to fucking the system...
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 12, 2008 5:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Credit cause cause and will cause problems beyond the bankruptcy of millions of consumers.
They are an engine of the economy of excess.
Development and lifestyle decisions are made that never would have been justified by the actual earnings and productivity of the individual user of credit cards.
Thus there is a multiplier effect that will trigger inflation, as well as bankruptcy, as artificial demand outstrips supply, or, as in the case of housing, artificially generated supply outstripped demand.
Americans act as if they are well-to-do; most are not. The gap between action and realtiy is another factor in the cheapening of the dollar and the eventual collapse of the economy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: witchjug on Aug 12, 2008 5:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The whole concept of credit is backwards
Posted by: opmoc
» Why is it a joke?
Posted by: suprmark
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 12, 2008 5:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Free money is not to be sniffed at - providing you have the self discipline to take advantage.
Of course the banks threw all this money out realising that a large percentage of people don't have this self discipline and would be unable to pay if off after the intro.
They are then screwed with completely extortionate amounts of interest.
The same is happenning with mortgages and its the banks themsleves that have lost all self discipline by turning the entire financial system into a casino whilst those supposedly in control are on LSD not of the pounds shilling and pence variety.
But house prices were ridiculously overvalued and simply had to come down to affordable levels.
We will all go through a period of financial turmoil until proper regulations are reinstated and banks start again providing the services to people and businesses which they were originally intended to provide.
A large mortgage on an undervalued house in about 3 years time will be an extremely good deal - providing it is a traditional repayment mortgage on a level of interest close to the bank rate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 12, 2008 6:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I was going to do it, but I found a decent job at the last minute
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Saved by the bell, or enslaved?
Posted by: phoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JBravoEcho11 on Aug 12, 2008 6:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atheistcable on Aug 12, 2008 6:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All my adult life I've been keenly aware of how my taxes were wasted by this warring nation and how lenders didn't have to produce anything--just sit on their fat ass and make money from the money given to them by those who didn't know how to resist the advertisers. And I wasn't going to contribute to these pigs, these parasites. I never bought a diamond, never supported South African apartheid or Rev. Charles Taylor. Never smoked, never supported Sen. Jesse Helms. Never bought illegal drugs, never supported private armies in foreign countries. I'm a strong advocate of legalized drugs--all of them.
Somewhere I read that Benjamin Franklin said: Dump your purse into your head. So, when I spent money, it was for educational purposes. (Of course, I spent money for a small apartment, and a mostly vegetarian diet.) Reading took the place of a car, traveling the world, going to movies and watching TV. With a few exceptions, I ate at home, not in restaurants. I am a tight-fisted miser without depriving myself of the pleasures of life--provided by solid intellectuals through their books. I've had a library card and never paid a fine for an over-due book or magazine in the past 40 years.
I was always aware that we live in an overpopulated world and I asked myself why I should spend money for kids when we already have too many. Oh-h-h, the money one can save by not having kids--or a wife. Never went to church to support a liar, a thief and a sexual predator. It's utterly immoral to drop money into that collection plate.
Likewise, I never gave to charity. And that doesn't make me a mean, insensitive or bad person. When I see some Christian organization begging for money to feed starving children, the first thing used to do was to look at the population growth rate of that country. Lester Brown of the Worldwatch Institute had a good influence on me. I don't do that anymore because I already know that poverty and overpopulation go hand-in-hand. I'm a strong advocate of abortion--for all three trimesters. Abortion is up to the woman, to have one or more for whatever reason she has--it's none of my business. Abortion is good--not an evil necessity as some will lament.
What we need to do is to teach people to be materially conservative and to boycott the capitalists as much as possible. Boycotting the capitalists includes depriving them of children.
Those are skills I developed in my lifetime. If you're going to labor, produce something that's useful, not junk just so that you can pay the landlord. Buy a house, don't rent. When you live in your own home, you then have 4th Amendment rights. I think the book that made me the saddest was "Working" by Studs Turkel. Legalize prostitution--and then teach people how not to be slaves or prostitutes. Of course, most of work is legalized prostitution.
I've been unemployed most of my life. That's because since I didn't spend much money, I had no need to work all the time. That further deprived capitalists of the profit they could make from me, it deprived federal and local governments of "my share" of taxes, and more of my time went to me--not an employer.
I wish to give advice without having any experience as one who was in debt to lenders, but I think if you live very modestly, you can pay off that credit card--and then cut it into 8 little pieces. As a reminder, take those 8 pieces and mount them on cardboard, frame it and hang it on your wall--as a reminder that you are now a recovering credit-card addict.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Life Is For Living - Max Out a Credit Card - Get Yourself a Girlfriend and Discover The World
Posted by: opmoc
» You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: donl51
» RE: You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: phoolish
» RE: You are wrong; he is right
Posted by: kegbot1
» Globalism will make "living in a cheap economy" impossible here shortly
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Life Is For Living - Max Out a Credit Card - Get Yourself a Girlfriend and Discover The World
Posted by: kegbot1
» You can't go after next of kin, why do so many people think that?
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: You can't go after next of kin, why do so many people think that?
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: You can't go after next of kin, why do so many people think that?
Posted by: thealltheone
» That's called a joint account.
Posted by: blogbooks
» Agree with opmoc. You've done a good job so far, but to really fuck the system...
Posted by: blogbooks
» A Bit Self Righteous
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: A Bit Self Righteous? give it a rest!
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Never Had a Credit Card
Posted by: Carol Burns
» Had Credit Cards
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Had Credit Cards
Posted by: KiwiBR
» RE: Never Had a Credit Card
Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: Never Had a Credit Card
Posted by: Gracchus
» How can you be unemployed and not starve or be homeless?
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Aug 12, 2008 6:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An important corollary to free market theory is the axiom that the private sector is more suited to provide all programs and services including education, healthcare and social security. The private sector is an integral part of the market while government is outside its ambit and therefore tugs at the so-called “invisible hand” that guides the market to achieve a natural balance among competing forces and interests.
The problem with an economic and social system based on free market principles is that it is neither free nor just. In theory it may sound plausible but in practice it is very deceptive in that the government does play a major role in the economy but not to serve the public interest but to serve the interests of the wealthy and powerful elites promoting a growing gap between the rich and poor. America now consists of two classes of people, the recently deprived and the recently enriched.
Between 1973 and 2007, average workers wages dropped 10% while corporate profits increased 219%. In 2006, the richest 1% of Americans paid 22.8% tax rate based on adjusted gross income. The same group paid 28.9% in 1996. The new minimum wage is $6.55 but in 1968, the inflation-adjusted minimum wage was $9.86. People working at the minimum wage can no longer afford the bare necessities of life.
The fallacy that the private sector can perform these services more effectively and efficiently is that corporations have only one objective, and that is to maximize profits. Would you expect a management team reporting to its shareholders that it is curtailing profits to save the environment or pay workers a living wage?
There are a number of strategies for maximizing profits such as reducing the quality of the product or service, lowering wages, minimizing benefits, minimizing health and safety practices, avoiding implementing environmentally-friendly strategies and raising prices. Sound familiar?
For example, Wal-Mart is notorious for paying low wages and minimum benefits while earning huge profits for its shareholders. Oil companies are responsible for massive environmental damage when extracting oil. HMO’s and the insurance companies have devoted significant resources for developing strategies to minimize payouts to people with health plans. Then there are the 50 million people who can afford medical coverage. In the process of producing bottled water, Coca Cola has depleted and polluted aquifers while selling bottled water which is not better than tap water to its customers.
Each problem in itself has a very adverse impact on Americans but unless the underlying problem is addressed, profits will prevail over people.
http://www.stateofdarkness.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Give this man a Cigar!! He gets it!!
Posted by: yellow
» Bible Bingo!
Posted by: mcartri
» Great one
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 12, 2008 7:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Well, there are those doggy biscuit "bonus" points on them cards that keep people going.
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ronheri on Aug 12, 2008 7:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nancy Sinatra Explained It.
Posted by: mcartri
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Carol Burns on Aug 12, 2008 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, I do owe the federal government. I received an SBA Disaster Loan after a major hurricane. FEMA did the absolute minimum to help, and I was told that my family could qualify for a FEMA grant by applying for an SBA disaster loan. I did not qualify for the grant, even though my house was leaking like a sieve and my husband & I had NO INCOME! (He was a self-employed subcontractor). The SBA was prepared to offer me a larger amount than I took, with the provision that they attach a lien to my home! By the time the SBA got around to funding the loan (3 months after my application and six months after the hurricane), I was so desperate that I took the money. It's not a lot of money per month, but it is a financial burden, especially in these dark times. I was hoodwinked, but FEMA and the SBA will both tell you that they are independent agencies and are not working in cahoots. So, the credit card companies are not the only threat!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You can stop all unsolicited credit card offers
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wallisp on Aug 12, 2008 8:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk it up with your friends, neighbors, companions, its all up to you to fix it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Aug 12, 2008 8:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will no longer have credit. If it is not in the bank I won't spend it.
The mortgage issue compounded the credit card issue just as explained in the article until there was no way out. This should have been done long ago but I was one of those fools who believed a good credit rating was so important. It is not. So much for the Bank Hype.
When I took this step I had a good credit rating. I was not even behind in any payments, however I had been playing the "game" switching money from one card to another to keep up with payments that could no longer be supported by my income, which has declined with the recession. The bleeding had to stop.
Believe it or not...I feel relieved.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My one-two punch.
Posted by: ellie
» RE: My one-two punch.
Posted by: cherylholmes
» RE: My one-two punch.
Posted by: donl51
» Relief today but not later
Posted by: harpy
» RE: Relief today but not later
Posted by: PortlandLiberal
» Reelectnoone, you've saved yourself.
Posted by: mcartri
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Carol Burns on Aug 12, 2008 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Aug 12, 2008 8:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
try to negotiate with companies... companies flip loans to each other so that no one has the actual file to look at to help you re-fi... finally give up cause $$ stops at life necessities like food, rent, utilities, no not including cable bill or any type of phone...
companies write off debt, credit score in sewer...
5 years later here they come but now on a fixed disability income that is 1/2 of what you made, you try again to re-negotiate with the vultures... car is repoed long ago, you called them and sent them the keys...
bring on the lawyers suing you for twice the amount owed plus 'court costs'... you scrape up half and offer it... they refuse to reply and file suit anyway... but, cash the money order anyway...
you send them what you can but it's not enough and they sue you for additional back interest and any other ponzi scheme they can dream up... bill winds up 2-3 times what it was in the first place... try to garnish your meager disability payments and you are 100% disabled anyway...
you've downsized everything you can possibly downsize already and still can't make it... no agencies will help, the famous 'don't know what to tell you' answer...
now you're homeless and in a soup kitchen line... trust me, know someone that this happened to...
we are looking at things inside out... the debtor's prison is where we all live now...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: here's how it goes...
Posted by: atheistcable
» RE: here's how it goes...
Posted by: cherylholmes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JPHickey on Aug 12, 2008 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Laws have probably changed, but I had defaulted on credit card debt well into the mid-five figures. My reasearch at that time indicated that if I did not pay one red cent, the debt would expire and be removed from my credit file after six years.
The trick was to be sure not to pay anything, or speak to anyone about this. Paying any small amount would have resulted in the resetting of the statue of limitations. I'm not sure that is the case today, you'd better check on it for yourselves.
As far as I'm concerned, when the big default in credit card an unsecured debt comes, if and when it comes, nothing will happen to anyone "guilty" of dropping out of "living up to your financial responsibilities". At that time, most will be in good company.
Even now, the U.S. can't afford to keep as many "criminals" as have been incarceratd. I wonder if they still bust petty pot smokers and put them in expensive often privately operated prisons? I do know that California already spends more on prisons than education (supposidly).
The economic system of the U.S. and apparently the "civilized world" lacks viability through and through. Really, how can we take this fraudulent system it too seriously? It's like a very bad joke. If you disagree, have I ever got a discounted derivitive for you! And rots of ruck to us all!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're not relieved of the debt after 2005
Posted by: harpy
» Yep, they own you peon #123-123-1234.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylholmes on Aug 12, 2008 10:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's likely already a bill in Congress that will do this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Owe Credit Cards? Lose Your Home
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: Many ways to have your home stolen
Posted by: phoolish
» Ha Ha, well, I figured out this game long ago.
Posted by: Smackback
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Newsguy on Aug 12, 2008 10:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Credit card interest was even tax deductible. The Republicans with the help of Democrats got rid of that benefit, and then in the last round of bankruptcy "reform" Republicans and some Democrats like Joe Biden helped make it much tougher on people overwhelmed with debt.
It is not all the fault of people who get into too much debt. It is way too often a hugely expensive medical crisis.
We need major reform of our economy, trade policy and health care reform to help people avoid massive debt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: symcokid on Aug 12, 2008 10:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 6399 on Aug 12, 2008 11:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lenders, including Visa et al, have the blessing of, and indeed, are encouraged by Congress to bring the American people to heel by way of total indebtedness.
Our Orwellian security apparatus has been constructed to ensure that each of you can be quickly located and efficiently imprisoned when you fail to pay your corporate masters precisely what you owe them.
Asking Congress to deal with this is like asking Halliburton and Lockheed to negotiate a truce in Iraq. I know all you warm and fuzzy folks who still think there is a peaceful solution to this will find what I'm about to say revolting, but . . .
Tens of thousands of worthless, parasitic American corporatists must be killed within the next 3-5 years if this country is to survive. They must be made an example of.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Congress is going to fix this? F'ing kidding, right?
Posted by: witchjug
» RE: Congress is going to fix this? F'ing kidding, right?
Posted by: 6399
» RE: Congress is going to fix this? F'ing kidding, right?
Posted by: kegbot1
» We the people don't have rights! Welcome to the new America
Posted by: Krain61
» Agreed, but it won't happen. Freedom and privacy are dead, this country won't survive with any...
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Aug 12, 2008 11:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The roots of stagnation, financialization and monopolization are not found in the 1970s but early after WWII. The sudden spurt of GDP growth after WWII was supported by the release of pent up demand during the highly productive war years and the failure to quickly demobilize the 12 million men and women in the US Armed Services which thus kept unemployment to a minimum. Trumans Federal Budget for FY 1950 was just over $42 billion with a full third of it directly committed to military spending and another 55% committed indirect spending military and security concerns. Only about 10% had no connection to military purposes. Thus, it was intense government spending, especially on the military, that provided the economic stimulus for the early post WWII US "economic miracle" rather than the dynamic of the private sector itself. It is interesting that the reduction of the top marginal income tax bracket from 90% to 70% was delayed until 1961 because of the large, necessary role played by military spending in stimulating and sustaining US capitalism.
Between 1957 and 1963, total non-farm employment grew by 4.3 million from 52.9 million to 57.2 million. Only 300,000 full time jobs of the 4.3 million job increase, or less than 8% were generated by non-farm private sector demand independant of government spending. Thus, the stagnation of the private sector job growth just as large tax cuts took place in the early 1960s, is evidence of late capitalism's chronic tendency toward stagnation despite fiscal policies and supply side stimulation of the private sector.
One reason was technology. Between 1947 and 1964, overall output levels and output per worker nearly doubled while the total number of production workers employed in the US manufacturing sector slightly declined. Thus, the growth of employment lagged well behind the growth of output and the GDP in general leading to a crisis of overproduction, growing unemployment and stagnant real wages. Eventually, industrial utilization capacity dropped sharply in the late 1960s from a peak of 90% in 1966 to about 72% in 1970. This led to a need for credit driven growth to clear inventories and sustain profit levels. Between 1945 and 1963, net private debt as a percentage of gross domestic product generated only by the private sector grew from 78% to 143%. It has been increasing steadily ever since that time.
Late capitalism, with its high average unemployment rates, slow post recession recoveries and low average annual rates GDP growth over the past thiry years, which have tended to fall to historic lows of well below 3%, signals the decline of US capitalism as a system.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Long Decline II.
Posted by: mnstra
» Good point about production. Technologically speaking, all manufactured goods are worthless.
Posted by: blogbooks
» We need a REAL ownership society
Posted by: jimbee
» RE: The Long Decline II.
Posted by: phoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Aug 12, 2008 12:00 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rcox on Aug 12, 2008 12:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Strongly agree. But the schools are owned by the same pigs as the rest of the country.
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: Strongly agree. But the schools are owned by the same pigs as the rest of the country.
Posted by: atheistcable
» Well, give it a shot. I don't have the time or interest to research who owns our schools.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hovey on Aug 12, 2008 12:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well at least for the biggest abusers. This government/generation of leaders have the belief that not only is debt good but that it can go on forever. sigh....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 12, 2008 12:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 12, 2008 12:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Hudson is Kucinich's chief economic advisor. His stuff is worth reading. He thinks that we've reached a point where the level of debt is simply too large to ever be paid back. (not just personal debt, but public debt as well)
www.Michael-Hudson.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: jimbee
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: jimbee
» RE: The difference is that we won't get bailed out
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Aug 12, 2008 2:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Aug 12, 2008 2:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you owe credit card debt alone, you can declare bankruptcy and keep your house. The credit card companies have to eat some of their debt. If, on the other hand, you've swapped for a mortgage or second mortgage, they've got your house too.
Watch yourself out there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Aug 12, 2008 3:16 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something has got to give, you say. But if there's but a decade left before global warming changes everything, and about that before there's no more oil, and we're all screwed, why bother to be good and thrifty? Why not just live it up and when it all collapses, if we're still around we'll figure something out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Indeed, leadership starts at the top. Ours is corrupt, fat, unethical, and disgustingly selfish.
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joaocleitao on Aug 12, 2008 3:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please visit our web site:
www.relocatenow.eu
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do you have a Plan B for your life?
Posted by: phoolish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Aug 12, 2008 4:10 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If society crumbles your debt will be meaningless. Better to have a few guns, a huge stockpile of food, and whatever else you can get by spending all of your available credit than it is to have no debt and some worthless paper money in a saving account.
If you really believe the doomsday prophecies you spout then the BEST advice would be to max out your credit cards, refinance your home (and build a smaller, cheaper one under someone else's name), take as many loans as possible etc. and buy REAL ASSETS (like guns, food, land, a home, gold, silver).
Seems to me that the only reason to pay back debt is because you expect the status quo to remain stable. There are no debtors prisons. If you don't pay and society crumbles, welp, looks like you just got a bunch of free shit.
"Society is about to crumble, pay down all your debt so the wealthy are in the most advantageous place possible to survive and continue to exploit humanity forever."
Good advice Alternet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's wrong with you people?
Posted by: Chaversteve
» Singularity? The Rapture of the Nerds? We'll see...n/t
Posted by: blogbooks
» RE: What's wrong with you people?
Posted by: kegbot1
» Franklin D. Roosevelt took American's gold by force, that's your answer
Posted by: blogbooks
» FDR was right! He may have "stole the gold" but the rich tried to steal America's economic recovery!
Posted by: yellow
» Interesting.
Posted by: blogbooks
» It is important to see the present as history.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: akbirdwm on Aug 12, 2008 4:14 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Foreign nations own the U.S., technically speaking
Posted by: blogbooks
» They don't own us. They are lending us money to keep consuming and outsourcing jobs
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Aug 12, 2008 4:19 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How repulsive.
Store after store that I have never heard of but sounds vaguely exotic and no doubt sells ridiculously expensive shit. I couldn't help but think to myself, as I always do when confronted by such a disgustingly hedonistic scene, "who buys this shit?"
Most of them catered to women.
I'd say about 40% of those in the mall were foreigners, no doubt connected in some way to an embassy given the size of their entourages and apparent wealth.
I can't think of anything more repulsive to my instincts than the sanitary, white washed, supremely artificial, yuppy bubble-world of an American mall in a wealthy area.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metamind on Aug 12, 2008 7:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A number-based economic system forces us to "go abstract" in our decision-making process because numbers are always abstract.
This is the essential evil of the system. It's easy to justify doing evil when you are "living in your head."
Imagine a system which allocated resources on need rather than greed, on wisdom rather than desire, on peace, kindness and compassion rather than domination and control.
The problem is much larger than we think.
The idea of money itself is at the root of it.
The Bible says "the love of money is the root of much evil." What it doesn't say is that the essential nature of love is attention. That means that we love whatever we pay attention to and therefore we love money by even thinking about it.
Let's start thinking about loving our brothers and sisters in humanity. There is one family ... the human family ... and we need an economic system which prioritizes the health and well being of our family.
Blessings!
Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Money is a failed system
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 12, 2008 9:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IF A BANKER KNEW HOW TO MAKE MONEY HE WOULDN'T NEED YOURS.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Chaversteve on Aug 13, 2008 1:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm not Danny, but here are the numbers
Posted by: hilly7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fodder on Aug 13, 2008 11:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Aren't debit cards actually the solution?
Posted by: hilly7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 13, 2008 1:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a crap job, so yeah in that regard I am broke. The economy is shitty as ever so yeah, in that regard I am indirectly broke.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm "gen-y" and I'm not broke
Posted by: blogbooks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Aug 14, 2008 1:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not just one to criticize, until a few years ago I was wholly part of the problem. I still am in some ways.
Credit is bad but our whole system is based on a false calculation of wealth. A fractional banking system allows banks to loan out ten times more than they have in reserve. So they don't have what they lend you which you don't have either.
This false value put us into this housing market jam as well because many companies applied the debt from mortgages owed to them (brought about by risky lending practices) to their overall profit margin.
So what is money?
Are commerce and money the same?
If you borrowed money with no intention to return it (no matter what the small print says) shame on you.
There are so many people who are being fiscally responsible to themselves, their family, and the community and there are just as many assholes who steal from us all.
Many of those assholes are running our government.
We should all think about the impact we have on one another. Our contact is economic as well as physical and the more we help each other the easier it will be.
We do not have government, we do not have freedom, we do not have democracy, we have each other. All we have is community. The ability to care about the whole and organize individually is what will save us in the end.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilly7 on Aug 16, 2008 10:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When one has more money that one can possibly spend, or generations to come can spend, what is left to be desired? Power and control. Thing of it is is that before this is over, many will be broke, many will die, and even more will wish for death. Ask another question, when all this pops, what are many 401ks, CDs, Pension Plans and more are tied to? This all hasn't been by flaw, it has been thought out, every detail, every counter.
It is not just here on failing economy, it is a global happening, and it ain't by accident. While many watch whatever show, sports, and other distractions, we have been slowly processed for one world government. There is a seperation between haves and have-nots, and the weeding will continue. Hint, hard work or loyalty will not entitle one to the have status, they consider it a birth right. If people wait until they are being loaded on box cars (already prepared), for camps, segregated not by color, religion, or any of the divisions they teach us to divide ourselves, rather by ability to conform and output of work- it will be too late. That is closer than one might think.
To Muse is to think. Placing an A in front of the word changes it to opposite. It is time we quit being Amused and start Musing for ourselves. OR - We can just be a product.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: circanow on Aug 17, 2008 6:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sensible Consumer
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: qqNageli on Sep 7, 2008 7:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
blue or pink Ugg boots, casual or winter Ugg boots, Ugg Australia's got them all for
Discount UGG Boots
UGG
UGG Boots
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign
Why Congress Wants You to Shun Your Local Bookstore and Shop at Amazon Instead




