COMMENTS: 39
Forced Sex and Labor Trafficking in the U.S.
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
LOS ANGELES -- We like to think of slavery in America as something consigned to history books, a dark chapter set in Southern cotton plantations and the hulls of ships set sail from Africa. Flor Molina wishes this were true.
For part of the year in 2003, Molina, a 29-year-old Mexican, was held against her will and forced to work in a factory in southern California, making dresses from 5:30 in the morning until 11 at night, seven days a week. She was not allowed to leave the factory or take a shower; she shared a small bed with another woman in the back of the shop. If she didn't sew fast enough, her boss would pull her hair, pinch and slap her.
"If we wouldn't do what she [her employer] said, she told us somebody who we love would pay the consequences," says Molina, a small woman with steady dark eyes and black hair that falls below her waist. "She told me she could kill me and no one would ask her for me. She told me dogs have more rights than I have in this country."
Molina is one of tens of thousands of people trafficked into the U.S. from other countries and forced to work against their will. They come here primarily from El Salvador, Mexico, Korea and China, but in any country where people are desperate for jobs they're prey to the allure of a mythic, prosperous U.S.
About 80 percent of those enslaved are women, pawns in the fastest-growing and one of the largest criminal industries in the world, second only to the drug trade and tied with the arms trade. With an estimated 800,000 people trafficked across all international borders each year, the shadow industry is estimated to generate $31.6 billion in profits annually.
There is a perception, propagated in large part by mainstream media, that slavery in the U.S. occurs mostly in the guise of forced prostitution. But the majority of trafficking victims are people who may be sewing our clothes, picking our crops, washing dishes in our restaurants, cleaning our motel rooms and building our homes and office buildings. They may be enslaved as domestic servants in our neighbors' homes.
Due in large part to the efforts of feminist groups, in 2000 Congress passed the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), which created a special "T-visa" that enables victims of sex and labor trafficking to remain temporarily in the United States -- if they agree to assist in the investigation or prosecution of their traffickers. After three years, the attorney general can admit them for permanent residency. The TVPA also made victims eligible for services such as housing, food stamps, cash assistance, health care and educational and job services.
But seven years after the passage of what was hailed as a very innovative law that created powerful new tools to prosecute and punish traffickers, the Bush administration has failed to fund and implement its provisions in a meaningful way. There has been a shocking lack of trafficking investigations -- just 639 were opened by the Department of Justice between fiscal years 2001 and 2006. Only 360 defendants have been charged, resulting in 238 convictions.
"Here we have this crime that is often rape plus torture plus assault, and yet we have virtually no enforcement," says Kevin Bales, president of Free the Slaves, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit. "Think of it this way: roughly 17,000 people were murdered in America last year -- about the same number as the Bush administration claims were trafficked. Imagine if we only prosecuted, as we do with slavery, a little over 100 of those cases. People would freak out; it would be on the cover of Time."
The regulations that the federal government was supposed to draft enabling victims of trafficking to gain permanent residency status have yet to be completed, so those who have been released from enslavement are left in limbo. And as of January, the federal government has provided refugee-type benefits to just over 1,100 people who had been trafficked. A group like CAST, a Los Angeles nonprofit that runs a shelter and provides other social services for trafficking victims, has seen its budget sliced 50 percent under a new system in which the federal money made available for victims under the Trafficking Act no longer goes directly to these nonprofit service providers. Instead, it is given to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops/Migration & Refugee Services, which then subcontracts with individual groups. Among other requirements, the Conference requires that service providers stipulate they won't hand out condoms or discuss abortion.
Furthermore, the requirement that trafficking victims must cooperate with law enforcement to prosecute their former traffickers in order to receive a T-visa puts women or their families at tremendous risk, says Kamala Harris, district attorney of San Francisco. "We have to do everything we can to make sure women and girls don't face retaliation, even death, for testifying," she says. "Then, if victims want to come forward and lend their voices, that's icing on the cake."
Within the next year, Congress will reauthorize the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. It's an opportunity, say advocates, to reform the law. Ultimately, however, ending labor slavery will take more than good laws and trained law enforcement: Corporations that profit from cheap labor must be held accountable.
Today, Flor Molina works as a security guard in Los Angeles. She wants to become a sheriff to help other victims of trafficking.
"I want to be a voice for those who are in fear, who don't have the power or the courage to come forward," she says. "There were a lot of people who helped me; I call them my angels. I want to be one of them for someone else."
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mizipi on Aug 15, 2007 1:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA has opportunity for work, but too many people get caught in the web of those who believe in the Golden Rule: He who has the gold, rules.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Aug 15, 2007 3:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nope. Remember, Illegal Immigration is a favourite of both ruling parties.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» well... How do you FIND victims of trafficking?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: supercrisp on Aug 15, 2007 4:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Can Democrats campaign on a pro-slavery platform?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 15, 2007 6:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And STOP looking at this slave issue as against women only ! Men are also being dragged into this mess !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You can thank Pelosi, Boxer, and the rest of the Dems who caved in to NAFTA for this !
Posted by: gathaiga
» RE: You can thank Pelosi, Boxer, and the rest of the Dems who caved in to NAFTA for this ! (Why?)
Posted by: Artaraxl
» I'm a NAFTA Hater Too but Gee, Can We Really Blame It For the Illegal Sex Trade and Forced Labor?
Posted by: yellow
» Had you read the actual pacts, you would have realized that "Free" trade opens the door to SLAVERY !
Posted by: maxpayne
» REREAD the NAFTA pact and please tell me what provision actually prohibits ILLEGAL SLAVE LABOR.
Posted by: maxpayne
» Understand I am Very Against NAFTA. Legal Obligations Exist to Protect Labor that aren't Enforced!!
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: messedup on Aug 15, 2007 6:24 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Totally"
Posted by: maddy
» RE: "Totally"
Posted by: maddy
» How about Totalitarian..
Posted by: messedup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Aug 15, 2007 8:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether a witness whose testimony we don't really want to consider, an urban minority caught with a contraband substance, or anyone else we wish to short-shrift, we sometimes want to just deny practically all rights & considerations to certain individuals. They're not 'folks like us', anyway. Whistle-blowers, loudmouthed dissidents and the lot of 'em.
We have to make sure they don't vote, complain too loudly, raise their heads up or expose our worst behaviour. And we want the public to understand that the right kind of people are invited to come in for an interview - or send their lawyers - whereas we should also be accustomed to seeing others cracked on the head and hauled off in chains for interogation. Possibly not to be seen again for years.
Then you'll get the message and hew to the proscribed norms. YOU want to be the 'right kind of person', don't you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Markson on Aug 15, 2007 8:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The meaning of "rape" has become devalued
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Here's why
Posted by: saml
» RE: Here's why
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Here's why
Posted by: SonOfBaldwin
» RE: Here's why
Posted by: saml
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mgloraine on Aug 15, 2007 9:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BushCo has no problem with this type of "outsourcing" because the victims are typically non-European and non-wealthy (i.e., they are not as important as rich white folks) and the use of barely-paid or unpaid slaves means more of that no-bid contract money goes directly into the pockets of the corporate and administration conspirators. Easy money for the suits. Too bad about the serfs.
If domestic slavery seems to be prospering unimpeded, it may be because it's proceeding with the full knowledge and cooperation of BushCo and/or one or more of their corporate sponsors. The only action likely to be forthcoming from the present administration with regard to slavery/forced labor issues would be an attempt to privatize it and award a no-bid contract for slave procurement to a crony corporation so as to secure a sizeable kickback. Business as usual.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: faultroy on Aug 15, 2007 12:55 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should we have a program that allows illegal aliens that have been trafficked to be granted permanent residency status in the United States for giving testimony against labor or sex trafficers? Shouldn't the fact that it is a violation of federal, state and international law be enough? Are we now going to give every American citizen
money and benefits because they reported a crime? What wacko policy is this?
Why should I as an american taxpayer support this person? She came into the country voluntarily-- illegally-- to make money under the table in violation of our federal and state laws. Now she wants us to give her pemanent status because someone took advantage of her? Well, she had no problem with trying to take advantage of us. It is interesting that I as an American do not have the same rights. What effective rights do I have as an American worker in redressing a prospective employer's misinformation on a job? None. I can leave or file a law suit--assuming I can prove the allegations-- but to do so requires tremendous financial resources.
And what about these moronic statistics? Since this program came into existence, there have only been 1,000 people that have taken advantage of a huge federal program?
It sounds incredibly wasteful to me. There are hundreds of federal, state and international laws that are already dealing with these issues. This is just another pork barrel program for hand wringing feminist bigots with too much time on their hands.
Isn't it interesting that the article mentions rape and torture, but funny, no statistics on convictions, or estimated number of incidents nor any history on how pervasive this problem is nor any research on this subject matter whatsoever--why is that? Where is the meat?
Why does Alternet continue to pound us with these mindless, stupid, empty, airheaded, time wasting articles that really are nothing more than some " advocacy expert" looking for a hand out/ meal ticket?
Is this what MS Magazine has come down to? No wonder most rational people equate the word Feminist with a perjorative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Because it is hard to prosecute without them
Posted by: sweet_byrd
» RE: Another Brainless Article...only outdone by another brainless post.
Posted by: Sojourner
» Wow, you really don't like women, do you?
Posted by: mgloraine
» I love it when you cry "Misogynist!"
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» YO Pigboy What's Feminism got to do with opposing illegal, international trafficking in young Girls.
Posted by: yellow
» Faultroy you're a moron. You're offensive to millions of victims acknowledged even by Bush's Gov't.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Landbaron on Aug 15, 2007 2:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution. The Current Laws don't protect Women but only Pimps.
Posted by: yellow
» RE: I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution. The Current Laws don't protect Women but only Pim
Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution. The Current Laws don't protect Women but only Pim
Posted by: yellow
» RE: I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution.
Posted by: Landbaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheena2u on Aug 26, 2007 3:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Cheney can find a way to walk on the rights of a citizen or non-citizen in order to keep more money for himself and his war machine, he will.
Cheney has been responsible for stripping funding from the elderly, the disabled, the wounded vets, the families of vets, college students, and funding to combat crimes against human beings in this country of all kinds. Because of Cheney the middle class is collapsing, health care is dead in the water, our borders are still unsecured, our bridges are collapsing, people are tortured, slavery exists, our Constitution is shredded, and all in the name of a game only he and his corrupt corporate fat cats can win.
When wil the American people say "enough?" When will the American people show some real gumption and do something? We have criminals in the White House! They are re-writing our Constitution, and stealing our Democracy and God given freedoms and rights. Cheney and his ilk are turning America into a corrupt and oily monarchy. Wake up America and get the bums out of the White House before its too late.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mizipi on Aug 15, 2007 1:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA has opportunity for work, but too many people get caught in the web of those who believe in the Golden Rule: He who has the gold, rules.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Aug 15, 2007 3:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nope. Remember, Illegal Immigration is a favourite of both ruling parties.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» well... How do you FIND victims of trafficking?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: supercrisp on Aug 15, 2007 4:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Can Democrats campaign on a pro-slavery platform?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 15, 2007 6:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And STOP looking at this slave issue as against women only ! Men are also being dragged into this mess !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You can thank Pelosi, Boxer, and the rest of the Dems who caved in to NAFTA for this !
Posted by: gathaiga
» RE: You can thank Pelosi, Boxer, and the rest of the Dems who caved in to NAFTA for this ! (Why?)
Posted by: Artaraxl
» I'm a NAFTA Hater Too but Gee, Can We Really Blame It For the Illegal Sex Trade and Forced Labor?
Posted by: yellow
» Had you read the actual pacts, you would have realized that "Free" trade opens the door to SLAVERY !
Posted by: maxpayne
» REREAD the NAFTA pact and please tell me what provision actually prohibits ILLEGAL SLAVE LABOR.
Posted by: maxpayne
» Understand I am Very Against NAFTA. Legal Obligations Exist to Protect Labor that aren't Enforced!!
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: messedup on Aug 15, 2007 6:24 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Totally"
Posted by: maddy
» RE: "Totally"
Posted by: maddy
» How about Totalitarian..
Posted by: messedup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Aug 15, 2007 8:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether a witness whose testimony we don't really want to consider, an urban minority caught with a contraband substance, or anyone else we wish to short-shrift, we sometimes want to just deny practically all rights & considerations to certain individuals. They're not 'folks like us', anyway. Whistle-blowers, loudmouthed dissidents and the lot of 'em.
We have to make sure they don't vote, complain too loudly, raise their heads up or expose our worst behaviour. And we want the public to understand that the right kind of people are invited to come in for an interview - or send their lawyers - whereas we should also be accustomed to seeing others cracked on the head and hauled off in chains for interogation. Possibly not to be seen again for years.
Then you'll get the message and hew to the proscribed norms. YOU want to be the 'right kind of person', don't you?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Markson on Aug 15, 2007 8:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The meaning of "rape" has become devalued
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Here's why
Posted by: saml
» RE: Here's why
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Here's why
Posted by: SonOfBaldwin
» RE: Here's why
Posted by: saml
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mgloraine on Aug 15, 2007 9:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BushCo has no problem with this type of "outsourcing" because the victims are typically non-European and non-wealthy (i.e., they are not as important as rich white folks) and the use of barely-paid or unpaid slaves means more of that no-bid contract money goes directly into the pockets of the corporate and administration conspirators. Easy money for the suits. Too bad about the serfs.
If domestic slavery seems to be prospering unimpeded, it may be because it's proceeding with the full knowledge and cooperation of BushCo and/or one or more of their corporate sponsors. The only action likely to be forthcoming from the present administration with regard to slavery/forced labor issues would be an attempt to privatize it and award a no-bid contract for slave procurement to a crony corporation so as to secure a sizeable kickback. Business as usual.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: faultroy on Aug 15, 2007 12:55 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should we have a program that allows illegal aliens that have been trafficked to be granted permanent residency status in the United States for giving testimony against labor or sex trafficers? Shouldn't the fact that it is a violation of federal, state and international law be enough? Are we now going to give every American citizen
money and benefits because they reported a crime? What wacko policy is this?
Why should I as an american taxpayer support this person? She came into the country voluntarily-- illegally-- to make money under the table in violation of our federal and state laws. Now she wants us to give her pemanent status because someone took advantage of her? Well, she had no problem with trying to take advantage of us. It is interesting that I as an American do not have the same rights. What effective rights do I have as an American worker in redressing a prospective employer's misinformation on a job? None. I can leave or file a law suit--assuming I can prove the allegations-- but to do so requires tremendous financial resources.
And what about these moronic statistics? Since this program came into existence, there have only been 1,000 people that have taken advantage of a huge federal program?
It sounds incredibly wasteful to me. There are hundreds of federal, state and international laws that are already dealing with these issues. This is just another pork barrel program for hand wringing feminist bigots with too much time on their hands.
Isn't it interesting that the article mentions rape and torture, but funny, no statistics on convictions, or estimated number of incidents nor any history on how pervasive this problem is nor any research on this subject matter whatsoever--why is that? Where is the meat?
Why does Alternet continue to pound us with these mindless, stupid, empty, airheaded, time wasting articles that really are nothing more than some " advocacy expert" looking for a hand out/ meal ticket?
Is this what MS Magazine has come down to? No wonder most rational people equate the word Feminist with a perjorative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Because it is hard to prosecute without them
Posted by: sweet_byrd
» RE: Another Brainless Article...only outdone by another brainless post.
Posted by: Sojourner
» Wow, you really don't like women, do you?
Posted by: mgloraine
» I love it when you cry "Misogynist!"
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» YO Pigboy What's Feminism got to do with opposing illegal, international trafficking in young Girls.
Posted by: yellow
» Faultroy you're a moron. You're offensive to millions of victims acknowledged even by Bush's Gov't.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Landbaron on Aug 15, 2007 2:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution. The Current Laws don't protect Women but only Pimps.
Posted by: yellow
» RE: I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution. The Current Laws don't protect Women but only Pim
Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution. The Current Laws don't protect Women but only Pim
Posted by: yellow
» RE: I believe strongly in Legalizing Prostitution.
Posted by: Landbaron
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheena2u on Aug 26, 2007 3:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Cheney can find a way to walk on the rights of a citizen or non-citizen in order to keep more money for himself and his war machine, he will.
Cheney has been responsible for stripping funding from the elderly, the disabled, the wounded vets, the families of vets, college students, and funding to combat crimes against human beings in this country of all kinds. Because of Cheney the middle class is collapsing, health care is dead in the water, our borders are still unsecured, our bridges are collapsing, people are tortured, slavery exists, our Constitution is shredded, and all in the name of a game only he and his corrupt corporate fat cats can win.
When wil the American people say "enough?" When will the American people show some real gumption and do something? We have criminals in the White House! They are re-writing our Constitution, and stealing our Democracy and God given freedoms and rights. Cheney and his ilk are turning America into a corrupt and oily monarchy. Wake up America and get the bums out of the White House before its too late.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign
Why Congress Wants You to Shun Your Local Bookstore and Shop at Amazon Instead




