COMMENTS: 26
Dick Gephardt's Fall: How a Progressive Stalwart Turned into a Spectacular Political Sellout
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
In March, months after the government gave an unprecedented $85 billion to AIG, the insurance giant released a list of counterparties, exposing some of the world's top financial institutions as the real recipients of the bailout. First among its peers, Goldman Sachs got a whopping $12.9 billion, despite having claimed in September to be insulated from AIG's troubles. Based on these revelations, Maryland Democratic Congressman Elijah Cummings, who had dogged the financial industry since the crisis began, told his staff to prepare a letter calling for an investigation.
Two Congressional staffers familiar with the matter told The Nation that a draft was circulated to House members on March 23. Within hours, Cummings's office had received a phone call from a lobbying firm hired by Goldman Sachs, making an "insistent but polite" request for a meeting. Cummings, intending to send the letter regardless, granted the audience, and so it was that top Goldman executives like president Gary Cohen and CFO David Viniar arrived the next day. They brought someone else too, a big-name Democratic politician with serious populist credibility: Dick Gephardt.
While Gephardt spent most of his twenty-eight years in national Democratic politics quietly promoting and voting with establishment interests, he is best known for his friendship with labor and advocacy for universal healthcare during two presidential runs. In 2003 he harshly condemned corporate crime, which he said "ruined people's lives for selfishness and greed," and launched his candidacy claiming, "Every proposal I'm making, every idea I'm advancing has a single, central purpose: to revive a failing economy and give working Americans the help and security they need." So why, six years later, was he on Capitol Hill representing one of the biggest players in the largest economic crisis since the Great Depression? And further, why was he recently working for Visa to kill credit card reform, helping Peabody Energy stymie climate change legislation and consulting for UnitedHealth Group alongside Tom Daschle to block meaningful healthcare reform?
As autumn sets in, the progressive agenda on which Barack Obama rode to victory last November has stalled, even with Democrats controlling every branch of government. Key aspects of healthcare reform, like a public option, appear dead; climate change legislation, having narrowly passed the House in June, awaits an uncertain fate in the Senate; the Employee Free Choice Act and financial industry reforms have gone off the grid. Behind all these setbacks is a pattern: with little outright opposition, corporate interests have insinuated themselves into the legislative process to co-opt attempts at reform. As a result, the big-ticket items are rotting away, key provisions have been removed and bills are being weakened beyond recognition behind closed doors.
Certainly there are still those in Congress willing to stand up to pressure from lobbyists--like Cummings, who, after meeting with Gephardt and the Goldman Sachs executives, sent his letter anyway, launching an investigation by TARP inspector general Neil Barofsky. But the broader momentum is with the corporate interests, thanks to players like Gephardt who have escorted them to the bargaining table. In a town where everyone seemingly has a price, Gephardt has distinguished himself, selling his reputation as a pro-labor, pro-universal healthcare, pro-environment expert and advocate to his new corporate masters, giving their efforts to kill and maim reforms a familiar, friendly face in the Democratic establishment. As a result, Gephardt has become a highly sought-after and very effective lobbyist. He has also betrayed nearly every principle he once claimed to hold.
When Gephardt ran for president in 1988, his ads claimed he had "defeated the strongest lobbying effort in history," and even in his waning Congressional years, he hardly seemed a defender of lobbying. "I'm running for president because I've had enough of the oil barons, the status-quo apologists, the special-interest lobbyists running amok," he proclaimed in February 2003. By January, his run for the presidency was over; a year later, he gathered with friends in St. Louis for a retirement party. Many politicians and celebrities paid homage: via video, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter lavished praise on him, and sportscaster Bob Costas called him "the best president America never had." When a reporter asked Gephardt about his plans for the future, he said he was going to spend some time with his family and consider a couple of employment opportunities.
On January 1, 2005--before Gephardt's term had even expired--the Congressman's son-in-law signed papers to form a consultancy firm based in Delaware called Gephardt and Associates (now the Gephardt Group). But for most of 2005 it lay dormant as Gephardt joined corporate boards and advised a few big-name companies. Banned from lobbying Congress for a year, he soon discovered there were places outside Washington that needed influencing.
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ffkling on Oct 13, 2009 4:46 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Geps Reps
Posted by: redbridge
» Obviously: Dick deserves his Payday ... any way he can get it
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Geps Reps
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» How foolish you are
Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: Geps Reps
Posted by: orwellturns
» Heck if he can't live off of what he was paid as a Senator
Posted by: RR#1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ST5895 on Oct 13, 2009 9:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: All politicians do this after they're done pimping for the lobbyists.
Posted by: Gentle Axeman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: siriuschange on Oct 14, 2009 4:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: heid on Oct 14, 2009 5:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Gephardt spent most of his twenty-eight years in national Democratic politics quietly promoting and voting with establishment interests...
It's obvious that Gephardt hasn't changed. All that's changed is that he no longer needs to cajole the public and a few key liberal-leaning groups into believing he's something he isn't.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 14, 2009 6:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After I got a letter published in The Philadelphia Inquirer criticizing him he telephoned me twice pleading his phoney economic justification for leaving Congress.
CAMPAIGN REFORM IS AN IMPERATIVE to cleanse this nation of this immoral grime.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Campaign reform does nothing to stop the sort of corruption...
Posted by: leafsong1
» So, tell us, what is the prescription to end this?
Posted by: ETSpoon
» RE: So What's New
Posted by: christee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 14, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gephart's claim to the status of "liberal" (don't even try to call him "progressive") consists entirely of his willingness to take campaign funds and other assistance from unions and give lip service to the interests of labor. There is no inconsistency between his former "stands" and his current one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ETSpoon on Oct 14, 2009 8:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Elsewhere an apparent schism is developing between longtime Republican stalwarts and the "teabagger" movement. And the 2010 congressional elections may afford Green Party candidates opportunities.
Yet even if Greens and insurgent "teabaggers" win seats to Congress will that fundamentally change anything?
No.
The corporations and the money and the lobbyists will still be there. And it wouldn't be very long until the starry-eyed reformers are corrupted, especially the ultra-conservative "teabaggers," since they are not all that sophisticated or educated.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Oct 14, 2009 8:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» He represented the right's favorite labor union
Posted by: ETSpoon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 14, 2009 9:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Oct 14, 2009 10:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Oct 14, 2009 10:42 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't doubt that he's done some nice things on a personal level and that he even comes from simple roots, but the fact of the matter is he does not work to the benefit of the american people, as we the voters put him there to do. He works to benefit Dick Gephardt.
Open your eyes Frank.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Talar on Oct 14, 2009 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a congressman, Gephardt consistently supported legislation to acknowledge this crime against humanity, cosponsoring resolutions as early as 1985 and as recently as 2003. In 2000, Gephardt urged then Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (also now a paid lobbyist for Turkey), to schedule an immediate vote on a genocide resolution because “Armenian American communities throughout the nation have waited long enough for Congress to recognize [this] horrible genocide.”
Gephardt is a major player in Turkey’s multi-million dollar campaign to deny the Armenian Genocide. In a summer 2008 report, “State of Denial,” the Southern Poverty Law Center noted that in 2007, under “a $1.2 million-a-year contract to lobby for Turkey, the former House majority leader . . . experienced a profound change of heart.” Gephardt escorted the Turkish ambassador to meetings on Capitol Hill with Democratic leaders, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and succeeded in killing another resolution.
Genocide denial is, according to scholars, the highest form of hate speech and the final stage of genocide. The International Association of Genocide Scholars, which unanimously affirmed the Armenian Genocide in 1997, urged President Obama in March to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, as “it was the template for all modern genocide,” and “the 94-year denial of the Armenian Genocide has emboldened perpetrators ever since.” Condemning Turkey’s “unethical pressure” and “coercion,” former IAGS President Gregory Stanton declared, “The intellectual freedom of our country cannot be held hostage by a foreign government, particularly by one with the worst human rights record in NATO.”
Someone should tell Dick Gephardt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Oct 14, 2009 3:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America, rest in peace.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daw13 on Oct 14, 2009 3:33 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: badkitty on Oct 14, 2009 3:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so disappointed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ffkling on Oct 13, 2009 4:46 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Geps Reps
Posted by: redbridge
» Obviously: Dick deserves his Payday ... any way he can get it
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Geps Reps
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» How foolish you are
Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: Geps Reps
Posted by: orwellturns
» Heck if he can't live off of what he was paid as a Senator
Posted by: RR#1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ST5895 on Oct 13, 2009 9:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: All politicians do this after they're done pimping for the lobbyists.
Posted by: Gentle Axeman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: siriuschange on Oct 14, 2009 4:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: heid on Oct 14, 2009 5:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Gephardt spent most of his twenty-eight years in national Democratic politics quietly promoting and voting with establishment interests...
It's obvious that Gephardt hasn't changed. All that's changed is that he no longer needs to cajole the public and a few key liberal-leaning groups into believing he's something he isn't.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 14, 2009 6:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After I got a letter published in The Philadelphia Inquirer criticizing him he telephoned me twice pleading his phoney economic justification for leaving Congress.
CAMPAIGN REFORM IS AN IMPERATIVE to cleanse this nation of this immoral grime.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Campaign reform does nothing to stop the sort of corruption...
Posted by: leafsong1
» So, tell us, what is the prescription to end this?
Posted by: ETSpoon
» RE: So What's New
Posted by: christee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 14, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gephart's claim to the status of "liberal" (don't even try to call him "progressive") consists entirely of his willingness to take campaign funds and other assistance from unions and give lip service to the interests of labor. There is no inconsistency between his former "stands" and his current one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ETSpoon on Oct 14, 2009 8:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Elsewhere an apparent schism is developing between longtime Republican stalwarts and the "teabagger" movement. And the 2010 congressional elections may afford Green Party candidates opportunities.
Yet even if Greens and insurgent "teabaggers" win seats to Congress will that fundamentally change anything?
No.
The corporations and the money and the lobbyists will still be there. And it wouldn't be very long until the starry-eyed reformers are corrupted, especially the ultra-conservative "teabaggers," since they are not all that sophisticated or educated.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Oct 14, 2009 8:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» He represented the right's favorite labor union
Posted by: ETSpoon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 14, 2009 9:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Oct 14, 2009 10:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Oct 14, 2009 10:42 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't doubt that he's done some nice things on a personal level and that he even comes from simple roots, but the fact of the matter is he does not work to the benefit of the american people, as we the voters put him there to do. He works to benefit Dick Gephardt.
Open your eyes Frank.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Talar on Oct 14, 2009 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a congressman, Gephardt consistently supported legislation to acknowledge this crime against humanity, cosponsoring resolutions as early as 1985 and as recently as 2003. In 2000, Gephardt urged then Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (also now a paid lobbyist for Turkey), to schedule an immediate vote on a genocide resolution because “Armenian American communities throughout the nation have waited long enough for Congress to recognize [this] horrible genocide.”
Gephardt is a major player in Turkey’s multi-million dollar campaign to deny the Armenian Genocide. In a summer 2008 report, “State of Denial,” the Southern Poverty Law Center noted that in 2007, under “a $1.2 million-a-year contract to lobby for Turkey, the former House majority leader . . . experienced a profound change of heart.” Gephardt escorted the Turkish ambassador to meetings on Capitol Hill with Democratic leaders, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and succeeded in killing another resolution.
Genocide denial is, according to scholars, the highest form of hate speech and the final stage of genocide. The International Association of Genocide Scholars, which unanimously affirmed the Armenian Genocide in 1997, urged President Obama in March to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, as “it was the template for all modern genocide,” and “the 94-year denial of the Armenian Genocide has emboldened perpetrators ever since.” Condemning Turkey’s “unethical pressure” and “coercion,” former IAGS President Gregory Stanton declared, “The intellectual freedom of our country cannot be held hostage by a foreign government, particularly by one with the worst human rights record in NATO.”
Someone should tell Dick Gephardt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Oct 14, 2009 3:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America, rest in peace.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daw13 on Oct 14, 2009 3:33 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: badkitty on Oct 14, 2009 3:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so disappointed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign
Why Congress Wants You to Shun Your Local Bookstore and Shop at Amazon Instead




