COMMENTS: 40
Wall Street Plans to Tap into $26 Trillion Life Insurance Market, Cashing in When People Die
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
Halloween is still a month away, but ghouls, ghosts and other grotesque creatures are already roaming America's streets, possibly preparing to knock at your door. What makes them so scream-out-loud horrifying is that they are the newly issued spawn of -- shriek! -- Wall Street.
The very same greed-fueled bankers who brought us the disaster of 2008's financial crash have created another exotic financial horror to replace their securitized subprime-mortgage packages that exploded all over us.
Wall Street wizards have been down in their corporate basements working furtively to fabricate some new, get-rich-quick financial gimmick, and -- Holy Frankenstein! -- they've done it.
It's a scheme based on the mundane (but huge) life insurance market. Wall Street intends to tap into the $26 trillion-worth of life insurance policies that Americans hold, using a financial mechanism called "life settlements."
Often, the ill and elderly need cash for assisted living or myriad other reasons, and a small network of insurance brokers exists to offer them a sizeable pile of money in exchange for being named the beneficiary of the policy. A broker might pay $400,000 for a million-dollar policy.
Wall Streeters intend to turn these life settlements into a big boon for investment banks and super-rich speculators. First, they will take over the broker side of the business, setting up extensive networks of heavily advertised, life-settlement agencies across the country to entice sick and old folks into settlements. You can imagine the come-ons: "Free Cash!" "Cash-in BEFORE You Die!" "You CAN Cheat Death!"
Next, Wall Street banks will "securitize" these settlements -- i.e., they will package thousands of them into bonds that they'll then sell (for hefty fees) to big investors around the globe. As a result, when Uncle Bob croaks in Dubuque, some speculator in Dubai will collect Bob's life insurance payout.
Drooling bankers anticipate a $500 billion market for this hustle. Even as Washington discusses ways to regulate Wall Street's earlier frenzied securitization lunacy, the giant banks are working themselves into this next frenzy. As one giddily exclaimed, "We're hoping to get a herd stampeding."
The New York Times reports that Credit Suisse is already shouting yippy-ti-yi-yo, "building a financial assembly line to buy large numbers of life insurance policies, package and resell them -- just as Wall Street did with subprime securities." Similarly, reports the Times, "Goldman Sachs has developed a tradable index of life settlements, enabling investors to bet on whether people will live longer than expected or die sooner than planned."
While this game of grave-robbing for fun and profit is exhilarating for the investing elite, it will be a downer for life insurance customers, for it means that the price of policies will go up. This is because insurance companies base their price on the actuarial calculation that numerous policyholders will pay premiums for years, but then cancel their policies before they die (due to personal financial reasons, family breakups, etc.). In these cases, the insurers collect a wealth of premiums without having to pay out a dime.
But this calculation is to be wrecked by Wall Street's intrusion into the once-straightforward relationship between insurer and insured. Now, some faraway, third-party investor will own the policy, keeping it in force until the former policyholder dies. Thus, the company will make more payouts than it figured to, compelling them to recalculate their balance sheets -- and jack up life insurance prices.
Once again, Wall Street is turning a pedestrian consumer product into a global casino game. Consumers lose, while speculators gain from exploiting other people's hardships, eventually reaping profits from their deaths.
Why should we go along with this real-life Halloween horror? As suggested by Forbes magazine columnist Michael Maiello, Congress could and should implement a simple reform stating that there's no payout on any life insurance policy that is "transferred into an investable security."
This would still allow life settlements for the relatively few people who actually need them -- but it would drive a stake in the cold hearts of Wall Street profiteers. What a happy Halloween that would be!
To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jonraabe on Oct 2, 2009 12:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Insuring an investment (in proportion to the value)
Posted by: aouie01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kedikat on Oct 2, 2009 1:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are mindless parasites that will kill their host by sucking the life out of it, then move on to the next healthy victim.
They produce nothing. They simply profit by skimming, reselling and gambling. They do not represent capitalism. They are the bane of capitalism. Continually draining it, crippling and deforming it.
They have perfected the most successful parasites maneuver. Taking over the very mind of the host. Controlling it. Even to the hosts systems of defense.
The parasites are now capitalism. We are merely the hosts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Destroy everything for profit.
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Caesar77 on Oct 2, 2009 2:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Oct 2, 2009 3:10 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For some greed is a selfish choice for others its in their DNA.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Oct 2, 2009 3:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 2, 2009 3:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So just assume, you are living in poverty, and barely making ends meet. You have an insurance policy worth $1,000,000 but the law is structured such that you cannot access any of that money - until you are dead.
It just so happens, that your Child is a really nasty selfish evil bastard, and is just waiting for you to die so he can inherit the proceeds of your life insurance policy.
And you think bugger it.
This fat wanker wants to give ne $400,000 cash now - if I just sign on the bottom line...
With that money, I can spend the last 20 years of my life having a really good time...
I'll negotiate and try and get $750,000.
I will then structure it, such that I receive a regular pension to maximise the value paid to me - for the remaining time I have left.
On my death, the pension payments will terminate.
My child will inherit nothing, so he is under absolutely no incentive whatsoever to bump me off and actually has to be nice to me if he wants to share any of my wealth.
It also incentivises him to get off his fat lazy arse and do something useful and earn a living for himself.
I haven't got any life insurance.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Seems Like a Good Idea To Me
Posted by: PJAW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 2, 2009 4:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example, you may have a wife and young children dependent on your income...
By the time you are 60 or 65, your Children will be grown up and no longer dependent.
However, the implications of this mean that if you die a month before you reach the age limit, your wife or any dependents will receive a maximum payout and be relatively wealthy.
If you die a month after the age limit, they may receive little or nothing and be left in poverty.
This has massive implications, because many people do become terminally ill around this time. If they actually survive to their birthday, they may be leaving their wife in poverty.
It would be far more sensible if life insurance pay outs were smoothly structured to gradually diminish the longer you live.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Some Life Insurance Policies Are Extremely Poorly Designed With Age Limits
Posted by: InsertNameHere
» RE: Some Life Insurance Policies Are Extremely Poorly Designed With Age Limits
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Oct 2, 2009 4:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a great way to suck people in, but I'm sure the tax hit will be greater for cashing in earlier.
Most wealth is inherited, that's why rich families stay rich. Not satisfied with that, now they've figured out how to get everyone's inheritance!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Only if it is some one else's fart. In this case it's the banker's.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 2, 2009 4:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They'll carve out the good portion for themselves, then let the rest go into default while they get billion dollar paydays.
And who will get stuck with the bill when 'ABC Life Insurance" can't pay off the death benefits because greedy Wall Street hucksters robbed the account?
One guess as to who will be stuck with this next bailout.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bubbleburster04 on Oct 2, 2009 5:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Verily, murder and fraud are the twin brothers of capitalism.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wzsteen on Oct 2, 2009 6:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rfgtile on Oct 2, 2009 7:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» not a chance
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 2, 2009 7:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» An angry woman -- I'm in love!
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shannonwhite on Oct 2, 2009 9:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 2, 2009 10:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wtfo on Oct 2, 2009 10:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it was not really a widespread practice prior to this new securitization plan, if it becomes as popular as the home mortage securitization bubble was I can envision a new for-profit business scheme spring up. It would employ pseudo hit-men who would be contracted to "arrange" for the accelerated demise of the people who had agreed to these life settlements so that the new owners of the securitized assets could reap the profits ASAP.
I personally find it hard to envision a more immoral way for investors to profit from the ill fortune of other people. If our nation lets this new creative Wall Street invention come to pass then I can pretty much guarantee that the life insurance industry will suddenly find more and more people mysteriously dieing before their life expectency tables predicted...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Here's What This Proves
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
Comments are closed-
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Oct 2, 2009 1:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's because they don't need to collect from the insurance to make money. The beauty of securitization. They only need to bundle together a bunch of insurance policies and determine a value, then sell them. So it doesn't matter to them whether there is a problem with payouts at a later date.
It's the same as the mortgage scheme. If Wall Street had been required to wait for all those bad mortgages to pay out in order to make money, rather than bundling and selling them, then we wouldn't have this mess. Then again, they wouldn't have touched it in the first place because there would be no quick buck.
Fundamentally, an insurance policy is a sounder vehicle for securitization than mortgages because, unlike a shady mortgage, it is pretty much guaranteed to pay out.. if you're talking about Universal coverage. In reality, it would be likely that corruption would rule the day, and the hucksters would find a way to bring the whole thing down, whilst getting away with the cash.
Think of this, an insurance company sets up a new firm to deal in getting people to cash out on their insurance (at a much lower rate than if paid out normally), then they turn around and securitize and sell the policy. A perfect storm!
It would be in their interest for you to live longer, because many Universal policies have a tax deferred savings account component. You would most likely be required to continue to pay premiums. So you would continue to put value into the account to be paid out to the holder of the securitized policy.
Term insurance, with its age limits, wouldn't really have a market in securitization. Then again, Wall Street never passes by a dime without stooping to pick it up. It's imaginable that they could pay out a lump sum on a Term policy, securitize and sell it. Since the policy isn't worth much once it expires, you would end up having to pay back the money at interest if you live too long. Or lose your house, having put it up as collateral. Either way, it matters not for the Wall Street gang, because of securitization, they will have already made their money. Like the payday loan industry, or a casino, the house always wins.
In any event, the end result is likely to be the same as before. Desperate people lured in by quick cash, only to find out that they, or their heirs, are stuck mopping up the mess once the party's over. Expect more suicides.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BobBrrz on Oct 2, 2009 4:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now comes the life insurance shell game. But it's not going to work until a LOT of old people hold life insurance policies. Lo and behold, my mailbox overfloweth with ads for, of all things, life insurance! Nobody has wanted to sell me life insurance for 20 years--I'm 73 years old, for heaven's sake--and now suddenly I'm a prime candidate for LIFE INSURANCE?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Oct 2, 2009 6:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This will chase them away quicker than death threats.
There is ONE way their scam may benefit people. The key words here are Insurable Interest, which means that the death of the insured would cause a hardship for someone (usually the Beneficiary of the policy), IF there's no insurance.
Here's how this works. Let's say Charlie has a policy on himself naming his wife the beneficiary. As a result of Charlie's sudden death, the proceeds of the face value of the policy are paid out to his wife who uses the money to pay off all outstanding bills, thus easing her life and eliminating the threat of collection agents and other vultures. That's what Imdemnity is all about.
Now, let's say that Charlie's wife completes her college education and lands a really well-paying job, effectively eliminating the Insurable Interest aspect as Charlie's wife accelerates payments on all outstanding bills to the point of near non-debt.
Charley goes for the cashout deal and gets half of the face value of the policy, enabling him and his wife to go on their Dream Vacation, buy a summer house, etc., etc.
It hardly matters WHO the beneficiary of the rest of the policy is, since Charlie's sudden death would no longer pose a financial threat to his wife.
This is one instance where this scam could work to the benefit of the insured, but let's face it; how mwny people are thar shrewd? Most of them would get shafted, as usual.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbstogner on Oct 2, 2009 8:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mortgage payment calulator current mortgage rates bad credit loan investools scam
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbstogner on Oct 2, 2009 8:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mortgage payment calulator current mortgage rates bad credit loan investools scam
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 3, 2009 1:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What would...
Posted by: Old Skeptic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theracerace on Oct 4, 2009 2:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only 2% of the population takes these simple steps, then the Wall Street monster will be stone cold dead by Halloween. Good riddance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This problem is easily solved: Don't Buy Insurance!
Posted by: Old Skeptic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Oct 6, 2009 11:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can't you just see the blockbuster movie
Posted by: global_butterfly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fredtowson on Oct 16, 2009 10:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is ONE way their scam may benefit people. The key words here are Insurable Interest, which means that the death of the insured would cause a hardship for someone (usually the Beneficiary of the policy), IF there's no insurance.
Here's how this works. Let's say Charlie has a policy on himself naming his wife the beneficiary. As a result of Charlie's sudden death, the proceeds of the face value of the policy are paid out to his wife who uses the money to pay off all outstanding bills, thus easing her life and eliminating the threat of collection agents and other vultures. That's what Imdemnity is all about.
Now, let's say that Charlie's wife completes her college education and lands a really well-paying job, effectively eliminating the Insurable Interest aspect as Charlie's wife accelerates payments on all outstanding bills to the point of near non-debt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sammyb on Oct 23, 2009 5:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blackpool Hotels on Oct 31, 2009 5:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jonraabe on Oct 2, 2009 12:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Insuring an investment (in proportion to the value)
Posted by: aouie01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kedikat on Oct 2, 2009 1:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are mindless parasites that will kill their host by sucking the life out of it, then move on to the next healthy victim.
They produce nothing. They simply profit by skimming, reselling and gambling. They do not represent capitalism. They are the bane of capitalism. Continually draining it, crippling and deforming it.
They have perfected the most successful parasites maneuver. Taking over the very mind of the host. Controlling it. Even to the hosts systems of defense.
The parasites are now capitalism. We are merely the hosts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Destroy everything for profit.
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Caesar77 on Oct 2, 2009 2:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Oct 2, 2009 3:10 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For some greed is a selfish choice for others its in their DNA.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Oct 2, 2009 3:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 2, 2009 3:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So just assume, you are living in poverty, and barely making ends meet. You have an insurance policy worth $1,000,000 but the law is structured such that you cannot access any of that money - until you are dead.
It just so happens, that your Child is a really nasty selfish evil bastard, and is just waiting for you to die so he can inherit the proceeds of your life insurance policy.
And you think bugger it.
This fat wanker wants to give ne $400,000 cash now - if I just sign on the bottom line...
With that money, I can spend the last 20 years of my life having a really good time...
I'll negotiate and try and get $750,000.
I will then structure it, such that I receive a regular pension to maximise the value paid to me - for the remaining time I have left.
On my death, the pension payments will terminate.
My child will inherit nothing, so he is under absolutely no incentive whatsoever to bump me off and actually has to be nice to me if he wants to share any of my wealth.
It also incentivises him to get off his fat lazy arse and do something useful and earn a living for himself.
I haven't got any life insurance.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Seems Like a Good Idea To Me
Posted by: PJAW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 2, 2009 4:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example, you may have a wife and young children dependent on your income...
By the time you are 60 or 65, your Children will be grown up and no longer dependent.
However, the implications of this mean that if you die a month before you reach the age limit, your wife or any dependents will receive a maximum payout and be relatively wealthy.
If you die a month after the age limit, they may receive little or nothing and be left in poverty.
This has massive implications, because many people do become terminally ill around this time. If they actually survive to their birthday, they may be leaving their wife in poverty.
It would be far more sensible if life insurance pay outs were smoothly structured to gradually diminish the longer you live.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Some Life Insurance Policies Are Extremely Poorly Designed With Age Limits
Posted by: InsertNameHere
» RE: Some Life Insurance Policies Are Extremely Poorly Designed With Age Limits
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Oct 2, 2009 4:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a great way to suck people in, but I'm sure the tax hit will be greater for cashing in earlier.
Most wealth is inherited, that's why rich families stay rich. Not satisfied with that, now they've figured out how to get everyone's inheritance!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Only if it is some one else's fart. In this case it's the banker's.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 2, 2009 4:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They'll carve out the good portion for themselves, then let the rest go into default while they get billion dollar paydays.
And who will get stuck with the bill when 'ABC Life Insurance" can't pay off the death benefits because greedy Wall Street hucksters robbed the account?
One guess as to who will be stuck with this next bailout.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bubbleburster04 on Oct 2, 2009 5:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Verily, murder and fraud are the twin brothers of capitalism.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wzsteen on Oct 2, 2009 6:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rfgtile on Oct 2, 2009 7:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» not a chance
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 2, 2009 7:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» An angry woman -- I'm in love!
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shannonwhite on Oct 2, 2009 9:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 2, 2009 10:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wtfo on Oct 2, 2009 10:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it was not really a widespread practice prior to this new securitization plan, if it becomes as popular as the home mortage securitization bubble was I can envision a new for-profit business scheme spring up. It would employ pseudo hit-men who would be contracted to "arrange" for the accelerated demise of the people who had agreed to these life settlements so that the new owners of the securitized assets could reap the profits ASAP.
I personally find it hard to envision a more immoral way for investors to profit from the ill fortune of other people. If our nation lets this new creative Wall Street invention come to pass then I can pretty much guarantee that the life insurance industry will suddenly find more and more people mysteriously dieing before their life expectency tables predicted...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Here's What This Proves
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
Comments are closed-
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Oct 2, 2009 1:42 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's because they don't need to collect from the insurance to make money. The beauty of securitization. They only need to bundle together a bunch of insurance policies and determine a value, then sell them. So it doesn't matter to them whether there is a problem with payouts at a later date.
It's the same as the mortgage scheme. If Wall Street had been required to wait for all those bad mortgages to pay out in order to make money, rather than bundling and selling them, then we wouldn't have this mess. Then again, they wouldn't have touched it in the first place because there would be no quick buck.
Fundamentally, an insurance policy is a sounder vehicle for securitization than mortgages because, unlike a shady mortgage, it is pretty much guaranteed to pay out.. if you're talking about Universal coverage. In reality, it would be likely that corruption would rule the day, and the hucksters would find a way to bring the whole thing down, whilst getting away with the cash.
Think of this, an insurance company sets up a new firm to deal in getting people to cash out on their insurance (at a much lower rate than if paid out normally), then they turn around and securitize and sell the policy. A perfect storm!
It would be in their interest for you to live longer, because many Universal policies have a tax deferred savings account component. You would most likely be required to continue to pay premiums. So you would continue to put value into the account to be paid out to the holder of the securitized policy.
Term insurance, with its age limits, wouldn't really have a market in securitization. Then again, Wall Street never passes by a dime without stooping to pick it up. It's imaginable that they could pay out a lump sum on a Term policy, securitize and sell it. Since the policy isn't worth much once it expires, you would end up having to pay back the money at interest if you live too long. Or lose your house, having put it up as collateral. Either way, it matters not for the Wall Street gang, because of securitization, they will have already made their money. Like the payday loan industry, or a casino, the house always wins.
In any event, the end result is likely to be the same as before. Desperate people lured in by quick cash, only to find out that they, or their heirs, are stuck mopping up the mess once the party's over. Expect more suicides.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BobBrrz on Oct 2, 2009 4:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now comes the life insurance shell game. But it's not going to work until a LOT of old people hold life insurance policies. Lo and behold, my mailbox overfloweth with ads for, of all things, life insurance! Nobody has wanted to sell me life insurance for 20 years--I'm 73 years old, for heaven's sake--and now suddenly I'm a prime candidate for LIFE INSURANCE?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Oct 2, 2009 6:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This will chase them away quicker than death threats.
There is ONE way their scam may benefit people. The key words here are Insurable Interest, which means that the death of the insured would cause a hardship for someone (usually the Beneficiary of the policy), IF there's no insurance.
Here's how this works. Let's say Charlie has a policy on himself naming his wife the beneficiary. As a result of Charlie's sudden death, the proceeds of the face value of the policy are paid out to his wife who uses the money to pay off all outstanding bills, thus easing her life and eliminating the threat of collection agents and other vultures. That's what Imdemnity is all about.
Now, let's say that Charlie's wife completes her college education and lands a really well-paying job, effectively eliminating the Insurable Interest aspect as Charlie's wife accelerates payments on all outstanding bills to the point of near non-debt.
Charley goes for the cashout deal and gets half of the face value of the policy, enabling him and his wife to go on their Dream Vacation, buy a summer house, etc., etc.
It hardly matters WHO the beneficiary of the rest of the policy is, since Charlie's sudden death would no longer pose a financial threat to his wife.
This is one instance where this scam could work to the benefit of the insured, but let's face it; how mwny people are thar shrewd? Most of them would get shafted, as usual.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbstogner on Oct 2, 2009 8:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mortgage payment calulator current mortgage rates bad credit loan investools scam
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbstogner on Oct 2, 2009 8:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mortgage payment calulator current mortgage rates bad credit loan investools scam
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 3, 2009 1:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What would...
Posted by: Old Skeptic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theracerace on Oct 4, 2009 2:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only 2% of the population takes these simple steps, then the Wall Street monster will be stone cold dead by Halloween. Good riddance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This problem is easily solved: Don't Buy Insurance!
Posted by: Old Skeptic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Oct 6, 2009 11:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can't you just see the blockbuster movie
Posted by: global_butterfly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fredtowson on Oct 16, 2009 10:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is ONE way their scam may benefit people. The key words here are Insurable Interest, which means that the death of the insured would cause a hardship for someone (usually the Beneficiary of the policy), IF there's no insurance.
Here's how this works. Let's say Charlie has a policy on himself naming his wife the beneficiary. As a result of Charlie's sudden death, the proceeds of the face value of the policy are paid out to his wife who uses the money to pay off all outstanding bills, thus easing her life and eliminating the threat of collection agents and other vultures. That's what Imdemnity is all about.
Now, let's say that Charlie's wife completes her college education and lands a really well-paying job, effectively eliminating the Insurable Interest aspect as Charlie's wife accelerates payments on all outstanding bills to the point of near non-debt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sammyb on Oct 23, 2009 5:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blackpool Hotels on Oct 31, 2009 5:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign
Why Congress Wants You to Shun Your Local Bookstore and Shop at Amazon Instead




