COMMENTS: 35
How Unions Gave My Redneck Family a Chance at the American Dream
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
In looking back on growing up, I always remember 1957 and 1958 as "the two good years." They were the only years my working-class redneck family ever caught a real break in their working lives, and that break came because of organized labor.
After working as a farmhand, driving a hicktown taxi part time and a dozen catch-as-catch-can jobs, my father found himself owning a used semi-truck and hauling produce for a Teamster-unionized trucking company called Blue Goose.
Daddy was making more money than he'd ever made in his life, about $4,000 a year. The median national household income at the time was $5,000, mostly thanks to America's unions. After years of moving from one rented dump to another, we bought a modest home ($8,000) and felt like we might at last be getting some traction in achieving the so-called American Dream.
Yup, Daddy was doing pretty good for a backwoods boy who'd quit school in the sixth or seventh grade -- he was never sure, which gives some idea how seriously the farm boy took his attendance at the one-room school we both attended in our lifetimes.
This was the golden age of both trucking and of unions. Thirty-five percent of American labor, 17 million working folks, were union members, and it was during this period the American middle class was created.
The American middle class has never been as big as advertised, but if it means the middle third income-wise, then we actually had one at the time. But whatever it means, one-third of working folks, the people who busted their asses day in and day out making the nation function, were living better than they ever had. Or at least had the opportunity to do so.
From the Depression through World War II, the Teamsters Union became a powerful entity, and a popular one, too, because of such things as its pledge never to strike during the war or a national emergency. President Roosevelt even had a special-designated liaison to the Teamsters.
But power and money eventually drew the usual assortment of lizards, and by the mid-'50s the Teamsters Union had become one corrupt pile of shit at the top level. So rotten even the mob enjoyed a piece of the action.
The membership, ordinary guys like my dad, was outraged and ashamed, but rendered powerless by the crooked union bosses in the big cities.
My old man was no great follower of the news or current events, but he tried to keep up with and understand Teamster developments. Which was impossible since his reading consisted of anti-union Southern newspapers, and the television coverage of Teamster criminality, including murders and the ongoing courtroom trials.
All this left him conflicted. His Appalachian Christian upbringing defined the world in black-and-white, with no gray areas. Inside, he felt he should not be even remotely connected with such vile things as the Teamsters were associated with. And he sometimes prayed for guidance in the matter.
On the other hand, there was the pride and satisfaction in providing for his family in ways previously impossible. He'd built a reasonable, working-class security for those times and that place in West Virginia. Being a Teamster certainly made that possible. But for damned sure no one had handed it to him. He drove his guts out to get what he had.
There were rules and log books and all the other crap that were supposed to assure drivers got enough rest., and ensure road safety and fairness for the truckers. Rural heartland drivers saw it for the bullshit it was, but it was much better-paying bullshit. For a little guy hauling produce from Podunk, USA, to the big cities, it still came down to heartburn, hemorrhoids and longer hauls and longer hours than most driver's falsified log books showed. And sometimes way too much Benzedrine, or "bennies."
Bennies were a type of speed commonly used by truckers back then because of the grueling hauls. As a former doper who has done bennies, I can avow they are some gritty, nerve-jagging shit. Their only virtue is making you wide awake and jumpy, and after you've been awake on them a couple of days, which many drivers were, crazier than a shithouse rat.
Nearly every truck stop sold bennies under the counter. Once, while hallucinating on bennies, Daddy nearly wiped out a roadside joint. He recalled “layin' on the jake brake, down shifting and watching hundreds of the witches like in The Wizard of Oz come down out of the sky in the dark." Somehow he got 30,000 pounds back onto the road while several folks inside the diner were pissing themselves in the windowside booths.
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richholland on Jun 22, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
every country in the world no matter how poor has underpaid illegal workers...
the sad thing is that PETAlovers without anyknowledge of animals, vegans without knowledge of food, feminist hating women and all those strange homo sapiens are the warriors of capitalisme...
let us realise some illegals are no problem, some lazy people can be fed but as soon there is an organization, paid jobs, money going around .
it is so cheap and easy to be politically correct.
Some of our europe green members of parliament do have big big cars and and huge mansions.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» ???
Posted by: Tricia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Jun 22, 2009 7:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Starving immigrants will always be willing to jump a border if that is how they can survive. If there is no work in Mexico, unemployed Mexicans will hop over the border if possible and if they think there is a job for them on the other side. Stop hiring them and they will not come.
We have this severe illegal employer problem now in significant part because unions have been destroyed. When unions were powerful, they exercised strict control over their membership and unionized shops were unable to hire undocumented immigrants - the union just would not allow it.
So, Honky, take your choice. Welcome unions and the prosperity that comes from good paying jobs, or continue to discourage unions and accept a failing economy, declining wages and an increase in cheap foreign workers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: trusetufree on Jun 23, 2009 12:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
meltdown,even moving in with their late 80s
grand,grands.This is the stuff that triggers
social upheavals.
That is why Beck and others are so busy with
their smoke screans,throwing sand to blind
people,so they do not react,or if they do,
against the wrong culprits.
But you can't hide the sun,soon or later
it will be so evident,that the propaganda
can't stop the true to come up,then....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Jun 23, 2009 5:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The meatpackers union was being busted through union busting techniques like "runaway plants" to "right to work states" in the late 1970s long before there were any illegals in the US meatpacking industry. Even today illegals make up little more than 25% of the total number of workers in the meatpacking industry. The illegal issues is just another divisive issue to turn workers against each other so there won't be a union in any US industry, meat packing or otherwise.
Honky is just another fascist troll who is trying to derail the discussion. Ignore him!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 22, 2009 12:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing has changed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I totally agree and as Frederick Douglass said...
Posted by: Quist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davy on Jun 22, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Jun 22, 2009 3:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats are especially guilty, the writer's lampoon of Obama is justified but even more so would be the hurling of our disgust against the allegedly prounion Reid and Pelosi.
Where is card check, doofuses? Is not card check more important than shoveling Bernankebucks into the vaults of banks that don's lend out the money to small business and workers? Ben would disagree with me. Obviouslyhe learned his compassion at the Passover Seder.
Small quibble with the writer: George Meany was not a Teamster like Beck and Hoffa, which the author claims. Meany was head of the AFLCIO and the old AFL before 1955 and the great merger between the AFL and CIO(in retrospect a bad idea as it diluted the more radical CIO). I believe Meany started out as a union plumber.
Meany hated Hoffa and Meany was never a Teamster. Meany threw the Teamsters out of the AFL-CIO in the late 50's, or maybe a bit earlier because of the obvious infiltration of the Teamsters by the Mob.
Nevertheless, Hoffa was a great man, built a great union, and the Kennedys' vendetta against him was inexplicable unless one concludes the reason wasn't Hoffa's Mob ties but the effectiveness of the Teamsters to organize not only truckers but as the 60's progressed, workers in various public and private sector areas.
The Teamsters' dream under Hoffa was to be a rival of AFLCIO, and to aggressively organize even as the author here urges us to do today.
Finally, a germane leftist article in an allegedly leftist website. No side irrelevant issues like immigration or how your orgasm ought to be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: bravo
Posted by: JSquercia
» which side are you on
Posted by: johnwinthrop
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal on Jun 22, 2009 5:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mom's Dad was a "super" in the mines during those years when workers were virtual slaves. His house was the same size as the rest of the company houses, but his was on the hill with the other management. He was killed in a mine cave-in during the mid fifties. He, too, "owed his soul to the company store", but had a bit more buying power and actually owned a car.
Unions created regulations that made the mines safer and allowed those workers, whose jobs are among the most dangerous on earth, to become middle class citizens.
My Dad, a WWII veteran, worked the mines. He attended school on the GI bill and was a electrical engineer in charge of infrastructure for over 8 mines. The GI bill, along with unions, gave all of the WWII veterans a chance at becoming middle class.
What I don't "get" is the lack of reasoning of the "ruling class". When there is a strong middle class the ruling class income is increased even though they are receiving less as a percentage of profits. Example: Right now a large number of Wal-Mart employees cannot afford shop at Wal-Mart, this is especially true if they are the sole bread-winner for the family. Those employees buy their clothes at thrift stores, or more likely are given vouchers that allow them to shop for free at the thrift store. They recieve food stamps and public housing. Their children are on Medicaide. If they are women they also can have healthcare when pregnant. If Wal-Mart were unionized and paid a living wage then those workers would be paying their own expenses plus be able to shop at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart would expand, i.e. bringing those workers into the middle class would "float all boats". The added benefit is that those workers would be contributing to the "system" instead of being on the recieving end.
If a strong middle class is once again created, then the upper class will benefit even more.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» For the greediest, wealth is about power. Hence the answer to you question
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» WalMart and unions = a bad deal
Posted by: ahmlco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tulugaq on Jun 22, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not this one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jun 22, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richholland on Jun 22, 2009 7:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After World war II the quality of life between
1958 and 1974 stopped the socialisme and communisme.
workers had homes and cars...russian workers stood quee to buy bread so it was obvious who was the best.
In Europe we didnt kill capitalisme but kept our social benefits....
And there is no communisme anymore (only for Wallstreetbankers) so who keeps the creepy lizards calm:
PETA???
Vegans???
Feminists????
maybe you might find tips on Mother Earth or become an expat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 22, 2009 7:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is true is that this is a class war (rich corporate oligarchy vs. the rest) that has gained a massive amount of ground over the years - and whether you are: a redneck, African-American, Latino, Asian, Native American - you are an American, and we have been and continue to be preyed upon by the power elite! That is a fact, and we all must see thru the mist and lies of the corporate oligarchy that keep us divided! Their aim is to keep the masses of people dumbed down and servile, our aim needs to be to even out the playing field for us all! To that end, I not only have the match, I've got tar and a pitchfork, so who's with me!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 22, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unions help level the playing field somewhat so that the corporations & elites don't pay people slave wages!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I meant to write physically sell their labor (not psychically), sorry.
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 22, 2009 8:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Poorly Worded Title of This Article...
Posted by: CatDad
» I think Joe Bageant sees the name "redneck" as a point of pride.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» Nevertheless....
Posted by: CatDad
» Also the political left is one's of Joe Bageant's main audiences. Using the name redneck
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gerald on Jun 22, 2009 8:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wbblack on Jun 22, 2009 10:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: adical Unionism
Posted by: CatDad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 22, 2009 11:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
World events are pretty complex, so much so that no one could possibly be current on all of them.
We rely on our "leaders" to do all the work of informing themselves of all the facts, analysing them, and arriving at prudent and beneficial decisions to best run our affairs.
I'm reasonably certain most of our national leaders worldwide have SOME idea of what effects the uncontrolled population explosion are having now, and are likely to have in the future.
One of these effects is happening right now.
Does anyone seriously think the "war" in Iraq and the abundance of oil there is a coincidence? This is the beginning of what will be called the Resource Wars. Oil is just one item on a long list. Water and food will almost certainly be next.
Criminals posing as businessmen are taking full advantage of the situation. The insanity of their mindset is such that they're blinded to the ghastly consequences of their actions. The only people who won't lose everything will be those with nothing to lose.
In the past, the collapse of the civilizations of old had local effects. We have a worldwide civilization now, and if it falls, who knows what legends the survivors will concoct to tell their children? Maybe something like the legend of Atlantis.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Benwa on Jun 22, 2009 5:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And didn't he move out of the US?
Posted by: countingdaisies
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ctguy on Jun 23, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Employee Free Choice Act would dramatically change the balance of power going forward, by significantly increasing workers' ability to organize without employer interference.
Forget about "fighting in the streets" if we cannot even get labor law reform.
Workers in the public sector have higher union density because employer opposition during the campaign is less. It's one of the reasons public employees have done better, and also one of the reasons they are under attack.
The pizza delivery guy, the independent trucker, the Wal-mart cashier cannot do much against corporate power without organization. Unions are imperfect, but they are the biggest worker organizations we have, and generally are now where they should be, among the leaders of the progressive movement.
If you have not urged your Senators & Congressional Reps to support the Employee Free Choice Act -- do it now!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fcisco on Jun 23, 2009 11:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sandy55 on Jun 26, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just thought I would point that out to you and anyone else who would care. More and more performance enhancing drugs are needed to maintain the demands of the work place. Employers know they just don't give a shit. It is all about profit then now and always.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PFW on Jun 29, 2009 1:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richholland on Jun 22, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
every country in the world no matter how poor has underpaid illegal workers...
the sad thing is that PETAlovers without anyknowledge of animals, vegans without knowledge of food, feminist hating women and all those strange homo sapiens are the warriors of capitalisme...
let us realise some illegals are no problem, some lazy people can be fed but as soon there is an organization, paid jobs, money going around .
it is so cheap and easy to be politically correct.
Some of our europe green members of parliament do have big big cars and and huge mansions.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» ???
Posted by: Tricia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Jun 22, 2009 7:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Starving immigrants will always be willing to jump a border if that is how they can survive. If there is no work in Mexico, unemployed Mexicans will hop over the border if possible and if they think there is a job for them on the other side. Stop hiring them and they will not come.
We have this severe illegal employer problem now in significant part because unions have been destroyed. When unions were powerful, they exercised strict control over their membership and unionized shops were unable to hire undocumented immigrants - the union just would not allow it.
So, Honky, take your choice. Welcome unions and the prosperity that comes from good paying jobs, or continue to discourage unions and accept a failing economy, declining wages and an increase in cheap foreign workers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: trusetufree on Jun 23, 2009 12:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
meltdown,even moving in with their late 80s
grand,grands.This is the stuff that triggers
social upheavals.
That is why Beck and others are so busy with
their smoke screans,throwing sand to blind
people,so they do not react,or if they do,
against the wrong culprits.
But you can't hide the sun,soon or later
it will be so evident,that the propaganda
can't stop the true to come up,then....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Jun 23, 2009 5:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The meatpackers union was being busted through union busting techniques like "runaway plants" to "right to work states" in the late 1970s long before there were any illegals in the US meatpacking industry. Even today illegals make up little more than 25% of the total number of workers in the meatpacking industry. The illegal issues is just another divisive issue to turn workers against each other so there won't be a union in any US industry, meat packing or otherwise.
Honky is just another fascist troll who is trying to derail the discussion. Ignore him!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 22, 2009 12:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing has changed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I totally agree and as Frederick Douglass said...
Posted by: Quist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davy on Jun 22, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Jun 22, 2009 3:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats are especially guilty, the writer's lampoon of Obama is justified but even more so would be the hurling of our disgust against the allegedly prounion Reid and Pelosi.
Where is card check, doofuses? Is not card check more important than shoveling Bernankebucks into the vaults of banks that don's lend out the money to small business and workers? Ben would disagree with me. Obviouslyhe learned his compassion at the Passover Seder.
Small quibble with the writer: George Meany was not a Teamster like Beck and Hoffa, which the author claims. Meany was head of the AFLCIO and the old AFL before 1955 and the great merger between the AFL and CIO(in retrospect a bad idea as it diluted the more radical CIO). I believe Meany started out as a union plumber.
Meany hated Hoffa and Meany was never a Teamster. Meany threw the Teamsters out of the AFL-CIO in the late 50's, or maybe a bit earlier because of the obvious infiltration of the Teamsters by the Mob.
Nevertheless, Hoffa was a great man, built a great union, and the Kennedys' vendetta against him was inexplicable unless one concludes the reason wasn't Hoffa's Mob ties but the effectiveness of the Teamsters to organize not only truckers but as the 60's progressed, workers in various public and private sector areas.
The Teamsters' dream under Hoffa was to be a rival of AFLCIO, and to aggressively organize even as the author here urges us to do today.
Finally, a germane leftist article in an allegedly leftist website. No side irrelevant issues like immigration or how your orgasm ought to be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: bravo
Posted by: JSquercia
» which side are you on
Posted by: johnwinthrop
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal on Jun 22, 2009 5:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mom's Dad was a "super" in the mines during those years when workers were virtual slaves. His house was the same size as the rest of the company houses, but his was on the hill with the other management. He was killed in a mine cave-in during the mid fifties. He, too, "owed his soul to the company store", but had a bit more buying power and actually owned a car.
Unions created regulations that made the mines safer and allowed those workers, whose jobs are among the most dangerous on earth, to become middle class citizens.
My Dad, a WWII veteran, worked the mines. He attended school on the GI bill and was a electrical engineer in charge of infrastructure for over 8 mines. The GI bill, along with unions, gave all of the WWII veterans a chance at becoming middle class.
What I don't "get" is the lack of reasoning of the "ruling class". When there is a strong middle class the ruling class income is increased even though they are receiving less as a percentage of profits. Example: Right now a large number of Wal-Mart employees cannot afford shop at Wal-Mart, this is especially true if they are the sole bread-winner for the family. Those employees buy their clothes at thrift stores, or more likely are given vouchers that allow them to shop for free at the thrift store. They recieve food stamps and public housing. Their children are on Medicaide. If they are women they also can have healthcare when pregnant. If Wal-Mart were unionized and paid a living wage then those workers would be paying their own expenses plus be able to shop at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart would expand, i.e. bringing those workers into the middle class would "float all boats". The added benefit is that those workers would be contributing to the "system" instead of being on the recieving end.
If a strong middle class is once again created, then the upper class will benefit even more.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» For the greediest, wealth is about power. Hence the answer to you question
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» WalMart and unions = a bad deal
Posted by: ahmlco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tulugaq on Jun 22, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not this one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jun 22, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richholland on Jun 22, 2009 7:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After World war II the quality of life between
1958 and 1974 stopped the socialisme and communisme.
workers had homes and cars...russian workers stood quee to buy bread so it was obvious who was the best.
In Europe we didnt kill capitalisme but kept our social benefits....
And there is no communisme anymore (only for Wallstreetbankers) so who keeps the creepy lizards calm:
PETA???
Vegans???
Feminists????
maybe you might find tips on Mother Earth or become an expat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 22, 2009 7:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is true is that this is a class war (rich corporate oligarchy vs. the rest) that has gained a massive amount of ground over the years - and whether you are: a redneck, African-American, Latino, Asian, Native American - you are an American, and we have been and continue to be preyed upon by the power elite! That is a fact, and we all must see thru the mist and lies of the corporate oligarchy that keep us divided! Their aim is to keep the masses of people dumbed down and servile, our aim needs to be to even out the playing field for us all! To that end, I not only have the match, I've got tar and a pitchfork, so who's with me!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 22, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unions help level the playing field somewhat so that the corporations & elites don't pay people slave wages!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I meant to write physically sell their labor (not psychically), sorry.
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 22, 2009 8:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Poorly Worded Title of This Article...
Posted by: CatDad
» I think Joe Bageant sees the name "redneck" as a point of pride.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» Nevertheless....
Posted by: CatDad
» Also the political left is one's of Joe Bageant's main audiences. Using the name redneck
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gerald on Jun 22, 2009 8:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wbblack on Jun 22, 2009 10:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: adical Unionism
Posted by: CatDad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 22, 2009 11:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
World events are pretty complex, so much so that no one could possibly be current on all of them.
We rely on our "leaders" to do all the work of informing themselves of all the facts, analysing them, and arriving at prudent and beneficial decisions to best run our affairs.
I'm reasonably certain most of our national leaders worldwide have SOME idea of what effects the uncontrolled population explosion are having now, and are likely to have in the future.
One of these effects is happening right now.
Does anyone seriously think the "war" in Iraq and the abundance of oil there is a coincidence? This is the beginning of what will be called the Resource Wars. Oil is just one item on a long list. Water and food will almost certainly be next.
Criminals posing as businessmen are taking full advantage of the situation. The insanity of their mindset is such that they're blinded to the ghastly consequences of their actions. The only people who won't lose everything will be those with nothing to lose.
In the past, the collapse of the civilizations of old had local effects. We have a worldwide civilization now, and if it falls, who knows what legends the survivors will concoct to tell their children? Maybe something like the legend of Atlantis.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Benwa on Jun 22, 2009 5:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And didn't he move out of the US?
Posted by: countingdaisies
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ctguy on Jun 23, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Employee Free Choice Act would dramatically change the balance of power going forward, by significantly increasing workers' ability to organize without employer interference.
Forget about "fighting in the streets" if we cannot even get labor law reform.
Workers in the public sector have higher union density because employer opposition during the campaign is less. It's one of the reasons public employees have done better, and also one of the reasons they are under attack.
The pizza delivery guy, the independent trucker, the Wal-mart cashier cannot do much against corporate power without organization. Unions are imperfect, but they are the biggest worker organizations we have, and generally are now where they should be, among the leaders of the progressive movement.
If you have not urged your Senators & Congressional Reps to support the Employee Free Choice Act -- do it now!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fcisco on Jun 23, 2009 11:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sandy55 on Jun 26, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just thought I would point that out to you and anyone else who would care. More and more performance enhancing drugs are needed to maintain the demands of the work place. Employers know they just don't give a shit. It is all about profit then now and always.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PFW on Jun 29, 2009 1:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Tax the Corporations and the Rich or Take Draconian Cuts -- the Decision Is Ours
Fury at Wall St. Banks Fuels Public Action for Move Your Money Campaign
Why Congress Wants You to Shun Your Local Bookstore and Shop at Amazon Instead




