ECONOMY  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 66

Geithner and Summers Want More Debt Bubbles: The Result Could Be Catastrophic

The Geithner/Summers plan seems to hinge on reinflating the debt bubble. The outcome will be inflation, a more serious crash, or both.
April 16, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

"Everything predicted by the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is now coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by the deluge of bank paper. It is cruel that such revolutions in private fortunes should be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead of employing their capital, if any they have, in manufactures, commerce, and other useful pursuits, make it an instrument to burden all the interchanges of property with their swindling profits, profits which are the price of no useful industry of theirs."

--Thomas Jefferson letter to Thomas Cooper, 1814.

Are we standing at the edge of a Great Inflation (like Weimar Germany), a second Republican Great Depression, or a return to the middle class prosperity of the Roosevelt/Eisenhower New Deal era? Until Americans understand the difference between "money" and "debt," odds are its going to be one of the first two, at least over the next few years.

Money

"Money" is a convenient replacement for barter in an economy. Instead of my giving you five pounds of carrots, so you wash my car, then you trade the carrots for a new shirt, and the clothing store then trades the carrots to a trucker that brings them their inventory, we all just agree to use a ten-dollar bill. Because a nation's money supply represents that nation's "wealth" -- the sum total of goods, services, and resources available in an economy/nation -- it needs to have a fixed value relative to the number/amount of goods, services, and resources within the nation.

As an economy grows -- more factories, more goods, more services -- the money supply grows so one dollar always represents the same number of carrots. (And with a fractional reserve banking system like we have, that growth is created mostly by banks lending money and creating it out of thin air in the process.)

If the money supply contracts, or grows slower than the economy, then we experience deflation -- the value of money increases, goods and services become less expensive (fewer dollars to buy the carrots), but because the value of money has increased it becomes harder to get. When this happens quickly, because of its economically destabilizing influence (businesses and people can't get current money -- cash -- or future money -- credit -- because money is more valuable), it's called a Depression.

On the other hand, if the money supply expands or grows faster than the economy, there are more dollars than there are goods and services so the number needed to buy a pound of carrots increases. This is inflation, and when it happens suddenly and on a large scale, it's called hyperinflation.

Therefore, one of the most important jobs overseen by Congress and executed by a Central Bank (or the Treasury Department if we were to go with the system envisioned by the Founders and Framers of the Constitution) is to "regulate the value" of our money (to quote Article I, Section 8.5 of our Constitution) by making sure the number of dollars in circulation always steadily tracks the size of the overall economy. If the economy grows 2%, then that year there should be 2% more dollars put into circulation. More than that will create inflation; fewer will create deflation.

Debt

"Debt" is not money. Instead, it's a charge against future money. But even though it's a charge against future money, it can still be spent as if it was today's money -- except that it must be repaid with interest. And therefore debt must have some sort of a balanced relationship to the total size of the economy -- albeit the future economy -- for it not to be destabilizing.

In other words, if over the next twenty years (the term of a typical and healthy mortgage) the economy is expected to grow by X percent or X number of dollars, then the total amount of twenty-year debts that can be issued should be limited to X. But if it's greater than X, then when the future arrives there won't be enough circulating money to repay the debt, because the economy (and the money supply) won't have grown as great as the debt repayment demand. The only two options are for debt holders to default (bankruptcies, foreclosures, etc. -- Depression), or for the government to suddenly increase the supply of money (inflation).

The same is true of one-year debt (credit cards), four -- or five-year debt (car loans, typically), and all other forms of debt. In aggregate, if the amount of debt is allowed to grow faster than the economy will grow over the term of the debt, when the debt is due there will be a problem, and if it's grown hugely, a disaster.


Thom Hartmann (thom at thomhartmann.com) is a Project Censored Award-winning New York Times best-selling author, and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk program The Thom Hartmann Show. www.thomhartmann.com His most recent books are "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight," "Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights," "We The People: A Call To Take Back America," "What Would Jefferson Do?," "Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class and What We Can Do About It," and "Cracking The Code: The Art and Science of Political Persuasion." His newest book is Threshold: The Crisis of Western Culture.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email


Comments are closed-

Exactly Right ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 16, 2009 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the only way to control the creation of currency and credit (debt) is to have sovereign control over the use of leverage by the US Treasury ... that is money will be created at a near constant rate and then auctioned off to those that need it ... banks etc.

In this way debt is contained and the US tax payer benefits by way of the US Treasury, from the use of their sovereign privilege, the creation of currency and credit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Could Be Catastrophic Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Could Be Catastrophic Posted by: villager1
» RE: xactly Right ... Posted by: robbrian

Comments are closed-

Some Experts!
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 16, 2009 1:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Summers, Geithner, Rubin, Greenspan, Gramm and their like should command the same respect as astrologers, necromancers and televangelists. For all of their Ivy League credentials, wealth and articulateness, their economic judgment is inferior to most working class people's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some Experts! Posted by: villager1
» RE: Some Experts! Posted by: Aquinas

Comments are closed-

Strengthening the Right's hand
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 16, 2009 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the catastrophe of the Obama-Geithner plan will greatly strengthen the Right's hand. They will say our economic mess was caused by leftist policies, when in fact the opposite is true. This will clear the way for the Jeb Bush Presidency in 2012, which will not go well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And that's why a well-armed populace is needed when we got Wall Street motherfuckers in control.
Posted by: Sports Warrior Casey Jones on Apr 16, 2009 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder the gun sales are soaring these days !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bizzarre logic Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Check the decision Posted by: ReallyBearish

Comments are closed-

Phantom wealth always runs to ground...
Posted by: jaynesian on Apr 16, 2009 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fantastic analysis, Mr. Hartmann. But the creation of phantom wealth through "debt" also distorts the economy in an even more insidious way -- through driving up land prices in an orgy of real estate speculation. It is at the heart of the rot now, and will be as long as we keep up the absurd market in "real estate," which means, almost by definition in America, land that is taken out of productive use (farm fields) for consumptive and purely speculative use (McMansions).

Whenever money is "lent into existence" infinitely, that is, based upon greed rather than need, it always ends up driving up rents and land prices, until nobody, not the poor farmer nor the city slum dweller nor the Park Avenue attorney, can literally afford the ground under their feet. When it all crashes, millions are needlessly ruined and displaced.

Most if not all of the horrendous "panics" and "depressions" Hartman alludes to throughout American history have featured real estate crashes at their festering cores.

Take for instance, the Panic of 1837, precipitated when Andrew Jackson broke up the Bank of the United States, and the money supply was put in the hands of state legislatures. The States promptly blew it all in a massive corrupt orgy of insider real-estate scams and "next big thing" swindles. It is extremely illuminating to hear our first deep Depression explained by Martin van Buren, who inherited the mess in his early weeks and was unfairly blamed. In his report to Congress he sounds in places positively Obamian:

”…our present condition is chiefly attributed to overaction in all the departments of business; an overaction…[leading to] excessive issues of bank paper, and other facilities for the acquisition and enlargement of credit. To this vast increase are to be added the many millions of credit, acquired by means of foreign loans, contracted by the States and State institutions, and above all, by the lavish accommodations extended by foreign dealers to our merchants.

“The consequences of this redundancy of credit and spirit of reckless speculation engendered by it, were, a foreign debt contracted by our citizens; the extension to traders in the interior of our country of credits for supplies, greatly beyond the wants of the people; the investment in unproductive public lands…the creation of debts, to an almost countless amount, for real estate in existing or anticipated towns and villages, equally unproductive, and at prices now seen to have been greatly disproportionate to their real value; the expenditure of immense sums in improvements found to be ruinously improvident [the "Canal to Nowhere"?]; the diversion to other pursuits of labor that should have gone to agriculture, thereby contributing to the expenditure of large sums in the importation of grain from Europe…and finally the rapid growth among all classes, especially in our great commercial towns, of luxurious habits, founded too often on merely fancied wealth, and detrimental alike to the industry, the resources, and the morals of our people.”

A final point. Hartmann also talks about Thos. Jefferson. It shouldn't be forgotten that Jefferson's over-riding concern in the Louisiana Purchase was not the expansion of Presidential power as we learned in school, though he wrestled with that. It was his agrarian impulse to preclude and check the concentration of wealth by landed interests, by making almost infinite acreage available for the natural increase of American family farmers, keeping them free of debt as the population expanded. (N.B. Jefferson was also in favor of limiting immigration. Of course that didn't happen, so it wasn't long before the population skyrocketed and the new Western acreage was bid up to bubble prices.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Goldman Sachs took a position
Posted by: weathered on Apr 16, 2009 3:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2 weeks ago in a South African goldmine.

Shitcan Shapiro she's dirty, indict Schummer and bust up this cartel of criminality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Goldman is crooked, not stupid Posted by: ReallyBearish

Comments are closed-

more right wing policy
Posted by: warrior woman on Apr 16, 2009 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to respond to the comment above: Strengthening the Right's hand. If the policies of our administration strengthen the rightwing, has it occured to you that perhaps, they are the right wing? In supporting rightwing policies and continuing to point us in the direction of spending, lending and deregulation, are they not simply pursuing right wing policy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more right wing policy Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Of course. Posted by: oregoncharles
» One bird, two right wings, Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

we could stand some inflation right now
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Apr 16, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously a Weimer Germany style hyper-inflation period would be a disaster, but a short run inflation spike is just what the doctor ordered for a country swimming in credit card debt and inflated mortgages.

Much better that housing becomes less valuable through inflation than through further price drops.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Default. Posted by: oregoncharles
» I should have been clearer Posted by: NthnBrazil

Comments are closed-

vote mcc
Posted by: joebhed on Apr 16, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the thing, my friend.
We have people like Hartmann, who are as progressive and independent as they come, yet all they can do is correctly rail against the current system.
When the F are they going to start some serious advocacy for the alternative of the public money system called for by Milton Friedman and the Chicago Plan economists, and bring the Greenback to the fore?
Why are klein, Krugman, Kuttner, Galbraith, Baker and Reich AFRAID to come out with the only real alternative money system that can actually pick up the pieces when the debt-money system is broke?
Why don't the progressive and populist economists have any courage, now, when it is needed?
Stop debating WHETHER debt is money, or credit is money, and call for the creation of REAL MONEY, debt-free at issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vote mcc Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: vote mcc Posted by: robbrian

Comments are closed-

Excellent Article
Posted by: robertmc on Apr 16, 2009 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thom Hartmann has a way of explaining things that not only provides a historical perspective but doesn't make it so technical a layperson wouldn't understand it. I've bookmarked this page so I can send it to friends that don't have a firm grasp of economic theory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent Article Posted by: Aquinas

Comments are closed-

The Denial Economy
Posted by: wbblack on Apr 16, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a lot of people know some or much of what Hartman is saying here, but they need to believe that the "bailout" is going to work because they're afraid to lose their stake -- however meager it may be -- in the way things are. They are in denial. Check out my blog post for more on this topic.

workingfertheman.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Thom, I am So disappointed!
Posted by: Alcinor on Apr 16, 2009 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thom, I am a dissappointed fan of yours. I love your incisive commentary on so many of the trends and events in American life.

But, apparently even you a paragon of the left inteligensia is afraid of this most awful truth. I am speaking of course about the central role of the Federal Reserve Bank, which as you Must know, is as Federal as Federal Express!

As you know, it is not just "the banks" or Geitner, it is the Fed that engineered the coming 2nd Great Depression just like they did the First and all recessions since its founding in 1913 by a group of European bankers who owned Central Banks, including the Bank of England, throughout Europe.

I won't go on. I will just point to some references that people who want to know the truth about the Fed can refer to and, lamentably, perhaps you should too, Thom.

G.Edward Griffin, renowned American intellectual has just reissued his ground breaking expose of the Fed, "The Creature From Jekyl Island, A Second Look." In it he explains in detail, (over 600 pages)how the European Bankers took over America and essentially enslaved us.

Patrick Carmack has produced an absolutely frightening documentary video called "The Money Masters" which should be required viewing for Thom and every American who wants to get the real story of how the International Bankers came to control America. It is 3 and a 1/2 hours long! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thom, I am So disappointed! Posted by: dmaciewski

Comments are closed-

Yikes tooth Fairies and Trolls
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 16, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
give me a fucking BREAK!!!
There are not magic wands to make everything Right with a wave of a hand. The shit is so far ingrained and wide spread, there is not easy solutions nor guarantees ANYTHING will Work.
Your Article is Remedial and lacks any serious step by step plan (not to mention any 'Bet my Life on it' guarantees)
If you have any recent education in Economics or Business- Your Tainted. You bear the 'mark' of the shit ass flavor of the Decades Economic theories which have plagued and stupified our Universities for the last 3 decades. Why the Hell would I listen to You now? Your 'Logic' Was beyond Flawed it was Lunacy and innately Treasonous, considering Our Founders Rejected 'Trickle Down' from their expereince with it under the Monarchy.
If you don't have a Economics or Business degree- you are even more handicapped because you understand even less about the system and it's pitfalls than the Assholes who constructed it.
The only Reason I have some trust in Geithner is because that Guy sees the Noose outside his window. Unlike Summers and some of the other Old Fucks who have the pleasure of thinking that one foot in the bucket will spare them prosecution or execution- Geithners got decades ahead of him. Plus doesn't he have small children? So he has a parental obligation to not screw over his kids, much like our President. He Looks in the eyes of the Future Generation every night when he goes home.
So being a Screaming ME ME about Economic Trolls is about as useful as hoping the Tooth fairy comes and Replaces your nest egg under your pillow.
Heres a little Remedial logic for you. The Rating agencies overrated Financial Corps, and their poroduct 'safty'. This opened the accounts of those 'safe' investments like Annuities, pensions to these recklessly addicted gamblers. Who's $1 do you think they leveraged those $40 off? Are you so naive as to think that $1 is still safely tucked under your pillow? So if it takes a bulldozer to fill in the trench left by the Heist of our retirment funds so be it. US middle lifers are going to need money in the future to offset the costs to the younger generation. If we're broke- they are going to be in serious shit. So we not only need to replenish those accounts- we need to re prime the pump so we can spend the next 30 yrs helping to pay down the deficit, incurred because of two illegal wars, Trickle Thefts, mounting Boomer Costs and derailed manufacturing revenue.Perhaps if we spend some now, we can not only shore back up those accounts with REAL money (allowing Us to support ourselve in Old age), but be able to generate an economy to help lift the burden off our kids.
So get over it- Your Retirement party will be held on the same day as your Wake!since the Boomers each generation has gotten smaller, Demographically this was going to be a problem- the Economic Treason committed by the Generation of Trickle Down economics only made it worse.
So unless we are willing to give up all forms of civilied society by ending tax & spend or We institute 'Logans Run' or 'Solent Green' this is going to be a clusterfuck no matter which ideas we follow. Your About 30 yrs too late Chicken little- the Sky was falling when Reagan Took the Oath and the Boomers moved into the Corner offices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Reinflating the Bubble Will Not Work.
Posted by: Urgelt on Apr 16, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not see how we return to the Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush bubble years. There is one thing that is different now that I do not think can be reversed.

Before the crash, we were a nation that imported goods and services and exported... nothing much, except dollars and dollar-denominated securities (debt). Certain other nations were contented with this arrangement; they accumulated trillions of dollars in currency and debt instruments and are holding them in their national reserves. China alone has over a trillion dollars and dollar-denominated securities (such as US Treasury Bills) in its reserves.

A dollar is a promise that you will be able to buy a good or a service with it. But what can those nations buy from us? We do not export much of anything except financial services. Our manufacturing infrastructure was wrecked, our infrastructure is deteriorating, our educational system relies on "teach to the test" rote memorization rather than instilling in kids a love of learning. All we have for sale is financial services.

And now it's starting to dawn on those countries who hold dollars and dollar-denominated securities that there is no way to redeem their holdings, except on US real estate or US corporations. With our real estate in free fall and our corporations cutting back or going bankrupt, why would they want to do that?

By cycling trillions and trillions of fraudulent securities into the financial system, then getting caught, Wall Street broke faith with their foreign customers. It will be a very long time before they are trusted again, and never unless there are assurances that US banks are no longer able to misrepresent their products.

Our political system has been captured by the very corporations who perpetrated this largest fraud in world history. There is no cop on the beat. Rather than bringing the criminals to justice, the US Government is taking on enormous new debt in an effort to prop them up, so they can... do what, exactly? They won't be exporting currency and debt instruments again. No credibility, no sale.

So as the Fed merrily gushes the money supply like never before, there is enormous downward pressure on the dollar's valuation against other currencies. It's got to drop. And when it does, those countries holding dollars in their reserves are going to take a bath.

Fear of that event may well trigger a currency panic. Once it starts, people won't be able to get rid of dollars fast enough.

To restore the credibility of our financial system and stabilize the dollar against downward pressure, we need to hammer those banks. Seize them. Cast sunshine on the books and provide transparency. Regulate. Prosecute misrepresentation (fraud).

We need to downsize Wall Street and be very careful about what we are doing with the money supply.

It will help if our Government looks like it isn't a wholly owned subsidiary of a criminal syndicate.

We'd better start seriously ramping up our ability to export goods and services, too. Otherwise, there will be nothing but hope to keep the dollar from plunging into the dirt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

If the electorate would look at the candidates on the issues instead of falling for
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 16, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
these silly personality contests, we the people wouldn't be stuck with Geithner and Summers to begin with. Instead of paying attention to candidates who don't believe in Gordon Gecko's "Greed is Good" ideology, you wanted to fall for some war boy or some phoney preaching "hope and change" even when Obama and McSame made it clear that they're staying the Dubya course. McSame would have given us the same economic schmucks but now that Obama's done it, suddenly even the most progressive/liberal groups out there are hamstrung about Obama's betrayal even when they shouldn't be. Had the electorate chosen wisely, Summers and Geithner wouldn't be in. Not to worry though. In 2012, the Obamabots will be worrying about their Republican opponent on social issues all the while defending Obama's rightwing lurch as "moderate". Go right ahead Obama. Keep selling us out and joining the GOP just like Clinton did in his 2 terms. If you're lucky to win another term by fluke in 2012, 2016 will be the ULTIMATE DEATH YEAR OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ! Go on you Obamabots. Keep up the rightwing fascism because your boy Barry's an Afro Democrat and you think it's ok for him to be an economic criminal. You think that returning Obama to his pre-2005 version will make him "unelectable" ? Fine ! Keep it up and keep smashing the progressive/liberal causes. Your children and future generations will HATE YOU !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It Takes Guts To Solve This Mess
Posted by: robbrian on Apr 16, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Franklin Roosevelt pronounced the country officially bankrupt, rescinded the promise to pay in gold and instantly created legal tender.

He monitized the debt just as Hamilton showed 200 years ago. Congress can today rectify its error of delegating that function to the Fed by buying back its own bonds with newly-issued U.S. Notes.

It's what's being done right now by the Fed. The problem is that the Fed dosen't retire the bonds and therefore, foists upon the government and taxpayers the burden of paying interest on fiat money. Thus, we get bonds and cash where with the Congress in control we only have cash and no debt. The Government can buy back it's own bonds and void them.

There would be no inflationary pressure simply because the banks would not have the cash equivalent in bonds with which to operate it's fractional reserve ponzi scheme.

Now, who wants to tell Summers/Geithner how to resolve their scam?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

State and restate a broken record
Posted by: solrev on Apr 16, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep reading these articles telling me the root cause of how we got into this mess. When is someone going to write an article telling me how we get out of this mess. We dug ourselves into a hole so deep we can’t climb out of it, the Obama policy seems to be, keep the sides from falling in on us. The credit market dried up, get some money to the banks to cover some of their losses, so they can loan money again and create some more wealth. Damn nobody is asking for loans. Spend a lot of money so we can create a fake consumer class and create some loans so we can create some wealth. Bubble, bubble toil and trouble. We sold out the American consumer before we got the third world consumers on line. We need to buy some time, until we get the new consumers in gear, because we are the financial service center of the world. All the slaves belong to us. Here is a warning to all you Babylonians, I mean globalists, beware the ides of the third party, the nationalists, we are not slaves nor will we wear the mark of the beast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I just printed out a trillion dollar bill on my printer
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 16, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were to sell it in Europe, I might get 1 euro for it if the artwork is pretty good, or 1/10 euro for mundane artwork.

Money only has intrinsic value if it can be paid back. I'm never going to pay a trillion U.S. dollars back for my trillion dollar bill. Nor will anyone else, so the bill's only intrinsic value is its artwork.

Our government has borrowed and printed up 10 trillion dollars. If the U.S. government goes high tech and invents the world's cheapest biofuel and the world's cheapest photovoltaic panels, then the government has a legitimate chance of earning 10 trillion dollars back and paying off the borrowers. If, on the other hand, the government hands out all the research money to the usual fabulously wealthy dum-dums and they reinvent the horse, the government and its taxpayers will only be able to pay back 1 trillion.

Currently $1.30 will buy 1 euro. If the US can only pay back 1 trillion out of 10 trillion with hard goods and services, then $13.00 will buy 1 euro.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This was One of the Reasons for the TEA PARTIES
Posted by: greatdanes on Apr 16, 2009 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this Spending doesn't Stop it will be a Repeat of the Weimar Republic. This is where we are headed and a Fascist Government.

WHY do you think Main Street Media was So Up set with the Tea Parties?

Come On Guys....join not as a person on the right or the left but as Americans. If we UNITE we can Beat Back ALL of the EVILS we All SEE on the left or the Right side of any issue. Come Together and we Will WIN!.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

excellent but one correction
Posted by: tazdelaney on Apr 16, 2009 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
loved the jefferson quote and i have a couple more below. also, your backgrounding and explanations, as well as prognosis, were all fine. one error, however, needs correcting. in business week in 1999, i read that the best estimate of the total world's GDP was then estimated at roughly $140billion, not the $65billion you used. one of the issues there is that athe value of a dollar in the usa isn'n necessarily the same buying power as a dollar in china or uganda. this brought about a major change in the 1990s as to how, for instance, the economic status of the PRC was considered. suddenly, the might of china's economy was better-seen, despite low per capita dollars.

the obvious and simple fact is that the united states is not the generator of 1/4 of all the world's income (14/65ths) in a now-defunct but great magazine of the early 1990s, 'business tokyo,' and other sources, the total revenue-stream of the global illegal drug trade was estimated at $9trillion. a piece i read by a former major in the US army who also did work for DEA/CIA before retiring in repudiation of the whole drugwar as a vast cesspool of high-level corruption and hypocrisy; he claimed in the early part of this century that the drug trade was maintaining itself at roughly 3/4 that of the US GDP, which would put it at 11 bilion now.

as the dying italian high-finance expert michele sindona wrote in the 1980s, only the central banks could possibly handle that massive quantity of cash. he also explained how the entire illegal drug trade wound up feeding a single pyramidal cabal which violently disparages 'independents' like humboldt county pot-growers or anyone who seeks to thwart payment of profits to the major players in the global game. he went on to detail that the biggest players outside of the central banks were, of necessity, the world's most powerful governments.

in a matter of pages, sindona clarified the true background of the drugwar as one which reaps trillions yearly and also enables the increased political control of dissidents and 'undesirable' minorities. the racial disparity of drugwar prisoners in the usa is as bad as that of nazi germany or apartheid south africa. while blacks represent 15% of drug users; blacks represent 50% of drugwar prisoners; even though it has been shown that whites actually use proportionately more drugs per capita than blacks – they also have more money to pay lawyers and judges...

something else to consider

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Excellent article!
Posted by: waterflaws on Apr 16, 2009 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Precisely true.
Posted by: yesman on Apr 16, 2009 8:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many in the government and the financial sector claim that economics is too complex to understand (at least, too complex for us regular dummies to understand), this article is quite comprehensible and quite correct. It's really pretty simple. The "complexity" advocates are just trying to obfuscate the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I agree
Posted by: public takeover on Apr 17, 2009 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why the cast of financial leadership in government hasn't changed much over the last three or four administrations.

If new people came in they could expose the extent of the deception and destruction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bill Leonard
Posted by: cougars62960 on Apr 17, 2009 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, deep in his heart Obama is a politician first. He knows that those that vote, vote their 401k’s. Reagan was a brilliant destructor of populism by getting everyone to put their retirement eggs in with the large corporations, he also started taxing my student stipend and unemployment benefits (mr monkeywrench). Lets stop for a moment to be thankful that social security didn’t go to Wall St too—that was one of the few things that was denied GWB during his reign.
I supported Obama, especially during the primary. One of the reasons for my not supporting Clinton was knowing that NYC would be asking for tax money. How did I know that economic crisis was on the horizon as early as 2005? I knew by getting news from financial blogs, not CNBC. Many blogs were warning of the housing bubble, though few thought we were headed for GD 2.0. I got out of the stock market long before it went bust. Then, I got out of the money market and into an fdic insured account a full year before the problems of fannie and freddie were publicized. Those that were screaming about impending doom were ignored by the corporate controlled MSM because there was lots of money to be made on the way up the debt-fueled bubbles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Exactly Right ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 16, 2009 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the only way to control the creation of currency and credit (debt) is to have sovereign control over the use of leverage by the US Treasury ... that is money will be created at a near constant rate and then auctioned off to those that need it ... banks etc.

In this way debt is contained and the US tax payer benefits by way of the US Treasury, from the use of their sovereign privilege, the creation of currency and credit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Could Be Catastrophic Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Could Be Catastrophic Posted by: villager1
» RE: xactly Right ... Posted by: robbrian

Comments are closed-

Some Experts!
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 16, 2009 1:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Summers, Geithner, Rubin, Greenspan, Gramm and their like should command the same respect as astrologers, necromancers and televangelists. For all of their Ivy League credentials, wealth and articulateness, their economic judgment is inferior to most working class people's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some Experts! Posted by: villager1
» RE: Some Experts! Posted by: Aquinas

Comments are closed-

Strengthening the Right's hand
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 16, 2009 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the catastrophe of the Obama-Geithner plan will greatly strengthen the Right's hand. They will say our economic mess was caused by leftist policies, when in fact the opposite is true. This will clear the way for the Jeb Bush Presidency in 2012, which will not go well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And that's why a well-armed populace is needed when we got Wall Street motherfuckers in control.
Posted by: Sports Warrior Casey Jones on Apr 16, 2009 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder the gun sales are soaring these days !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bizzarre logic Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Check the decision Posted by: ReallyBearish

Comments are closed-

Phantom wealth always runs to ground...
Posted by: jaynesian on Apr 16, 2009 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fantastic analysis, Mr. Hartmann. But the creation of phantom wealth through "debt" also distorts the economy in an even more insidious way -- through driving up land prices in an orgy of real estate speculation. It is at the heart of the rot now, and will be as long as we keep up the absurd market in "real estate," which means, almost by definition in America, land that is taken out of productive use (farm fields) for consumptive and purely speculative use (McMansions).

Whenever money is "lent into existence" infinitely, that is, based upon greed rather than need, it always ends up driving up rents and land prices, until nobody, not the poor farmer nor the city slum dweller nor the Park Avenue attorney, can literally afford the ground under their feet. When it all crashes, millions are needlessly ruined and displaced.

Most if not all of the horrendous "panics" and "depressions" Hartman alludes to throughout American history have featured real estate crashes at their festering cores.

Take for instance, the Panic of 1837, precipitated when Andrew Jackson broke up the Bank of the United States, and the money supply was put in the hands of state legislatures. The States promptly blew it all in a massive corrupt orgy of insider real-estate scams and "next big thing" swindles. It is extremely illuminating to hear our first deep Depression explained by Martin van Buren, who inherited the mess in his early weeks and was unfairly blamed. In his report to Congress he sounds in places positively Obamian:

”…our present condition is chiefly attributed to overaction in all the departments of business; an overaction…[leading to] excessive issues of bank paper, and other facilities for the acquisition and enlargement of credit. To this vast increase are to be added the many millions of credit, acquired by means of foreign loans, contracted by the States and State institutions, and above all, by the lavish accommodations extended by foreign dealers to our merchants.

“The consequences of this redundancy of credit and spirit of reckless speculation engendered by it, were, a foreign debt contracted by our citizens; the extension to traders in the interior of our country of credits for supplies, greatly beyond the wants of the people; the investment in unproductive public lands…the creation of debts, to an almost countless amount, for real estate in existing or anticipated towns and villages, equally unproductive, and at prices now seen to have been greatly disproportionate to their real value; the expenditure of immense sums in improvements found to be ruinously improvident [the "Canal to Nowhere"?]; the diversion to other pursuits of labor that should have gone to agriculture, thereby contributing to the expenditure of large sums in the importation of grain from Europe…and finally the rapid growth among all classes, especially in our great commercial towns, of luxurious habits, founded too often on merely fancied wealth, and detrimental alike to the industry, the resources, and the morals of our people.”

A final point. Hartmann also talks about Thos. Jefferson. It shouldn't be forgotten that Jefferson's over-riding concern in the Louisiana Purchase was not the expansion of Presidential power as we learned in school, though he wrestled with that. It was his agrarian impulse to preclude and check the concentration of wealth by landed interests, by making almost infinite acreage available for the natural increase of American family farmers, keeping them free of debt as the population expanded. (N.B. Jefferson was also in favor of limiting immigration. Of course that didn't happen, so it wasn't long before the population skyrocketed and the new Western acreage was bid up to bubble prices.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Goldman Sachs took a position
Posted by: weathered on Apr 16, 2009 3:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2 weeks ago in a South African goldmine.

Shitcan Shapiro she's dirty, indict Schummer and bust up this cartel of criminality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Goldman is crooked, not stupid Posted by: ReallyBearish

Comments are closed-

more right wing policy
Posted by: warrior woman on Apr 16, 2009 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to respond to the comment above: Strengthening the Right's hand. If the policies of our administration strengthen the rightwing, has it occured to you that perhaps, they are the right wing? In supporting rightwing policies and continuing to point us in the direction of spending, lending and deregulation, are they not simply pursuing right wing policy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more right wing policy Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Of course. Posted by: oregoncharles
» One bird, two right wings, Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

we could stand some inflation right now
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Apr 16, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously a Weimer Germany style hyper-inflation period would be a disaster, but a short run inflation spike is just what the doctor ordered for a country swimming in credit card debt and inflated mortgages.

Much better that housing becomes less valuable through inflation than through further price drops.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Default. Posted by: oregoncharles
» I should have been clearer Posted by: NthnBrazil

Comments are closed-

vote mcc
Posted by: joebhed on Apr 16, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the thing, my friend.
We have people like Hartmann, who are as progressive and independent as they come, yet all they can do is correctly rail against the current system.
When the F are they going to start some serious advocacy for the alternative of the public money system called for by Milton Friedman and the Chicago Plan economists, and bring the Greenback to the fore?
Why are klein, Krugman, Kuttner, Galbraith, Baker and Reich AFRAID to come out with the only real alternative money system that can actually pick up the pieces when the debt-money system is broke?
Why don't the progressive and populist economists have any courage, now, when it is needed?
Stop debating WHETHER debt is money, or credit is money, and call for the creation of REAL MONEY, debt-free at issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vote mcc Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: vote mcc Posted by: robbrian

Comments are closed-

Excellent Article
Posted by: robertmc on Apr 16, 2009 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thom Hartmann has a way of explaining things that not only provides a historical perspective but doesn't make it so technical a layperson wouldn't understand it. I've bookmarked this page so I can send it to friends that don't have a firm grasp of economic theory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent Article Posted by: Aquinas

Comments are closed-

The Denial Economy
Posted by: wbblack on Apr 16, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a lot of people know some or much of what Hartman is saying here, but they need to believe that the "bailout" is going to work because they're afraid to lose their stake -- however meager it may be -- in the way things are. They are in denial. Check out my blog post for more on this topic.

workingfertheman.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Thom, I am So disappointed!
Posted by: Alcinor on Apr 16, 2009 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thom, I am a dissappointed fan of yours. I love your incisive commentary on so many of the trends and events in American life.

But, apparently even you a paragon of the left inteligensia is afraid of this most awful truth. I am speaking of course about the central role of the Federal Reserve Bank, which as you Must know, is as Federal as Federal Express!

As you know, it is not just "the banks" or Geitner, it is the Fed that engineered the coming 2nd Great Depression just like they did the First and all recessions since its founding in 1913 by a group of European bankers who owned Central Banks, including the Bank of England, throughout Europe.

I won't go on. I will just point to some references that people who want to know the truth about the Fed can refer to and, lamentably, perhaps you should too, Thom.

G.Edward Griffin, renowned American intellectual has just reissued his ground breaking expose of the Fed, "The Creature From Jekyl Island, A Second Look." In it he explains in detail, (over 600 pages)how the European Bankers took over America and essentially enslaved us.

Patrick Carmack has produced an absolutely frightening documentary video called "The Money Masters" which should be required viewing for Thom and every American who wants to get the real story of how the International Bankers came to control America. It is 3 and a 1/2 hours long! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thom, I am So disappointed! Posted by: dmaciewski

Comments are closed-

Yikes tooth Fairies and Trolls
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 16, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
give me a fucking BREAK!!!
There are not magic wands to make everything Right with a wave of a hand. The shit is so far ingrained and wide spread, there is not easy solutions nor guarantees ANYTHING will Work.
Your Article is Remedial and lacks any serious step by step plan (not to mention any 'Bet my Life on it' guarantees)
If you have any recent education in Economics or Business- Your Tainted. You bear the 'mark' of the shit ass flavor of the Decades Economic theories which have plagued and stupified our Universities for the last 3 decades. Why the Hell would I listen to You now? Your 'Logic' Was beyond Flawed it was Lunacy and innately Treasonous, considering Our Founders Rejected 'Trickle Down' from their expereince with it under the Monarchy.
If you don't have a Economics or Business degree- you are even more handicapped because you understand even less about the system and it's pitfalls than the Assholes who constructed it.
The only Reason I have some trust in Geithner is because that Guy sees the Noose outside his window. Unlike Summers and some of the other Old Fucks who have the pleasure of thinking that one foot in the bucket will spare them prosecution or execution- Geithners got decades ahead of him. Plus doesn't he have small children? So he has a parental obligation to not screw over his kids, much like our President. He Looks in the eyes of the Future Generation every night when he goes home.
So being a Screaming ME ME about Economic Trolls is about as useful as hoping the Tooth fairy comes and Replaces your nest egg under your pillow.
Heres a little Remedial logic for you. The Rating agencies overrated Financial Corps, and their poroduct 'safty'. This opened the accounts of those 'safe' investments like Annuities, pensions to these recklessly addicted gamblers. Who's $1 do you think they leveraged those $40 off? Are you so naive as to think that $1 is still safely tucked under your pillow? So if it takes a bulldozer to fill in the trench left by the Heist of our retirment funds so be it. US middle lifers are going to need money in the future to offset the costs to the younger generation. If we're broke- they are going to be in serious shit. So we not only need to replenish those accounts- we need to re prime the pump so we can spend the next 30 yrs helping to pay down the deficit, incurred because of two illegal wars, Trickle Thefts, mounting Boomer Costs and derailed manufacturing revenue.Perhaps if we spend some now, we can not only shore back up those accounts with REAL money (allowing Us to support ourselve in Old age), but be able to generate an economy to help lift the burden off our kids.
So get over it- Your Retirement party will be held on the same day as your Wake!since the Boomers each generation has gotten smaller, Demographically this was going to be a problem- the Economic Treason committed by the Generation of Trickle Down economics only made it worse.
So unless we are willing to give up all forms of civilied society by ending tax & spend or We institute 'Logans Run' or 'Solent Green' this is going to be a clusterfuck no matter which ideas we follow. Your About 30 yrs too late Chicken little- the Sky was falling when Reagan Took the Oath and the Boomers moved into the Corner offices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Reinflating the Bubble Will Not Work.
Posted by: Urgelt on Apr 16, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not see how we return to the Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush bubble years. There is one thing that is different now that I do not think can be reversed.

Before the crash, we were a nation that imported goods and services and exported... nothing much, except dollars and dollar-denominated securities (debt). Certain other nations were contented with this arrangement; they accumulated trillions of dollars in currency and debt instruments and are holding them in their national reserves. China alone has over a trillion dollars and dollar-denominated securities (such as US Treasury Bills) in its reserves.

A dollar is a promise that you will be able to buy a good or a service with it. But what can those nations buy from us? We do not export much of anything except financial services. Our manufacturing infrastructure was wrecked, our infrastructure is deteriorating, our educational system relies on "teach to the test" rote memorization rather than instilling in kids a love of learning. All we have for sale is financial services.

And now it's starting to dawn on those countries who hold dollars and dollar-denominated securities that there is no way to redeem their holdings, except on US real estate or US corporations. With our real estate in free fall and our corporations cutting back or going bankrupt, why would they want to do that?

By cycling trillions and trillions of fraudulent securities into the financial system, then getting caught, Wall Street broke faith with their foreign customers. It will be a very long time before they are trusted again, and never unless there are assurances that US banks are no longer able to misrepresent their products.

Our political system has been captured by the very corporations who perpetrated this largest fraud in world history. There is no cop on the beat. Rather than bringing the criminals to justice, the US Government is taking on enormous new debt in an effort to prop them up, so they can... do what, exactly? They won't be exporting currency and debt instruments again. No credibility, no sale.

So as the Fed merrily gushes the money supply like never before, there is enormous downward pressure on the dollar's valuation against other currencies. It's got to drop. And when it does, those countries holding dollars in their reserves are going to take a bath.

Fear of that event may well trigger a currency panic. Once it starts, people won't be able to get rid of dollars fast enough.

To restore the credibility of our financial system and stabilize the dollar against downward pressure, we need to hammer those banks. Seize them. Cast sunshine on the books and provide transparency. Regulate. Prosecute misrepresentation (fraud).

We need to downsize Wall Street and be very careful about what we are doing with the money supply.

It will help if our Government looks like it isn't a wholly owned subsidiary of a criminal syndicate.

We'd better start seriously ramping up our ability to export goods and services, too. Otherwise, there will be nothing but hope to keep the dollar from plunging into the dirt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

If the electorate would look at the candidates on the issues instead of falling for
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 16, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
these silly personality contests, we the people wouldn't be stuck with Geithner and Summers to begin with. Instead of paying attention to candidates who don't believe in Gordon Gecko's "Greed is Good" ideology, you wanted to fall for some war boy or some phoney preaching "hope and change" even when Obama and McSame made it clear that they're staying the Dubya course. McSame would have given us the same economic schmucks but now that Obama's done it, suddenly even the most progressive/liberal groups out there are hamstrung about Obama's betrayal even when they shouldn't be. Had the electorate chosen wisely, Summers and Geithner wouldn't be in. Not to worry though. In 2012, the Obamabots will be worrying about their Republican opponent on social issues all the while defending Obama's rightwing lurch as "moderate". Go right ahead Obama. Keep selling us out and joining the GOP just like Clinton did in his 2 terms. If you're lucky to win another term by fluke in 2012, 2016 will be the ULTIMATE DEATH YEAR OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ! Go on you Obamabots. Keep up the rightwing fascism because your boy Barry's an Afro Democrat and you think it's ok for him to be an economic criminal. You think that returning Obama to his pre-2005 version will make him "unelectable" ? Fine ! Keep it up and keep smashing the progressive/liberal causes. Your children and future generations will HATE YOU !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It Takes Guts To Solve This Mess
Posted by: robbrian on Apr 16, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Franklin Roosevelt pronounced the country officially bankrupt, rescinded the promise to pay in gold and instantly created legal tender.

He monitized the debt just as Hamilton showed 200 years ago. Congress can today rectify its error of delegating that function to the Fed by buying back its own bonds with newly-issued U.S. Notes.

It's what's being done right now by the Fed. The problem is that the Fed dosen't retire the bonds and therefore, foists upon the government and taxpayers the burden of paying interest on fiat money. Thus, we get bonds and cash where with the Congress in control we only have cash and no debt. The Government can buy back it's own bonds and void them.

There would be no inflationary pressure simply because the banks would not have the cash equivalent in bonds with which to operate it's fractional reserve ponzi scheme.

Now, who wants to tell Summers/Geithner how to resolve their scam?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

State and restate a broken record
Posted by: solrev on Apr 16, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep reading these articles telling me the root cause of how we got into this mess. When is someone going to write an article telling me how we get out of this mess. We dug ourselves into a hole so deep we can’t climb out of it, the Obama policy seems to be, keep the sides from falling in on us. The credit market dried up, get some money to the banks to cover some of their losses, so they can loan money again and create some more wealth. Damn nobody is asking for loans. Spend a lot of money so we can create a fake consumer class and create some loans so we can create some wealth. Bubble, bubble toil and trouble. We sold out the American consumer before we got the third world consumers on line. We need to buy some time, until we get the new consumers in gear, because we are the financial service center of the world. All the slaves belong to us. Here is a warning to all you Babylonians, I mean globalists, beware the ides of the third party, the nationalists, we are not slaves nor will we wear the mark of the beast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I just printed out a trillion dollar bill on my printer
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 16, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were to sell it in Europe, I might get 1 euro for it if the artwork is pretty good, or 1/10 euro for mundane artwork.

Money only has intrinsic value if it can be paid back. I'm never going to pay a trillion U.S. dollars back for my trillion dollar bill. Nor will anyone else, so the bill's only intrinsic value is its artwork.

Our government has borrowed and printed up 10 trillion dollars. If the U.S. government goes high tech and invents the world's cheapest biofuel and the world's cheapest photovoltaic panels, then the government has a legitimate chance of earning 10 trillion dollars back and paying off the borrowers. If, on the other hand, the government hands out all the research money to the usual fabulously wealthy dum-dums and they reinvent the horse, the government and its taxpayers will only be able to pay back 1 trillion.

Currently $1.30 will buy 1 euro. If the US can only pay back 1 trillion out of 10 trillion with hard goods and services, then $13.00 will buy 1 euro.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This was One of the Reasons for the TEA PARTIES
Posted by: greatdanes on Apr 16, 2009 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this Spending doesn't Stop it will be a Repeat of the Weimar Republic. This is where we are headed and a Fascist Government.

WHY do you think Main Street Media was So Up set with the Tea Parties?

Come On Guys....join not as a person on the right or the left but as Americans. If we UNITE we can Beat Back ALL of the EVILS we All SEE on the left or the Right side of any issue. Come Together and we Will WIN!.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

excellent but one correction
Posted by: tazdelaney on Apr 16, 2009 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
loved the jefferson quote and i have a couple more below. also, your backgrounding and explanations, as well as prognosis, were all fine. one error, however, needs correcting. in business week in 1999, i read that the best estimate of the total world's GDP was then estimated at roughly $140billion, not the $65billion you used. one of the issues there is that athe value of a dollar in the usa isn'n necessarily the same buying power as a dollar in china or uganda. this brought about a major change in the 1990s as to how, for instance, the economic status of the PRC was considered. suddenly, the might of china's economy was better-seen, despite low per capita dollars.

the obvious and simple fact is that the united states is not the generator of 1/4 of all the world's income (14/65ths) in a now-defunct but great magazine of the early 1990s, 'business tokyo,' and other sources, the total revenue-stream of the global illegal drug trade was estimated at $9trillion. a piece i read by a former major in the US army who also did work for DEA/CIA before retiring in repudiation of the whole drugwar as a vast cesspool of high-level corruption and hypocrisy; he claimed in the early part of this century that the drug trade was maintaining itself at roughly 3/4 that of the US GDP, which would put it at 11 bilion now.

as the dying italian high-finance expert michele sindona wrote in the 1980s, only the central banks could possibly handle that massive quantity of cash. he also explained how the entire illegal drug trade wound up feeding a single pyramidal cabal which violently disparages 'independents' like humboldt county pot-growers or anyone who seeks to thwart payment of profits to the major players in the global game. he went on to detail that the biggest players outside of the central banks were, of necessity, the world's most powerful governments.

in a matter of pages, sindona clarified the true background of the drugwar as one which reaps trillions yearly and also enables the increased political control of dissidents and 'undesirable' minorities. the racial disparity of drugwar prisoners in the usa is as bad as that of nazi germany or apartheid south africa. while blacks represent 15% of drug users; blacks represent 50% of drugwar prisoners; even though it has been shown that whites actually use proportionately more drugs per capita than blacks – they also have more money to pay lawyers and judges...

something else to consider

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Excellent article!
Posted by: waterflaws on Apr 16, 2009 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Precisely true.
Posted by: yesman on Apr 16, 2009 8:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many in the government and the financial sector claim that economics is too complex to understand (at least, too complex for us regular dummies to understand), this article is quite comprehensible and quite correct. It's really pretty simple. The "complexity" advocates are just trying to obfuscate the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I agree
Posted by: public takeover on Apr 17, 2009 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why the cast of financial leadership in government hasn't changed much over the last three or four administrations.

If new people came in they could expose the extent of the deception and destruction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bill Leonard
Posted by: cougars62960 on Apr 17, 2009 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, deep in his heart Obama is a politician first. He knows that those that vote, vote their 401k’s. Reagan was a brilliant destructor of populism by getting everyone to put their retirement eggs in with the large corporations, he also started taxing my student stipend and unemployment benefits (mr monkeywrench). Lets stop for a moment to be thankful that social security didn’t go to Wall St too—that was one of the few things that was denied GWB during his reign.
I supported Obama, especially during the primary. One of the reasons for my not supporting Clinton was knowing that NYC would be asking for tax money. How did I know that economic crisis was on the horizon as early as 2005? I knew by getting news from financial blogs, not CNBC. Many blogs were warning of the housing bubble, though few thought we were headed for GD 2.0. I got out of the stock market long before it went bust. Then, I got out of the money market and into an fdic insured account a full year before the problems of fannie and freddie were publicized. Those that were screaming about impending doom were ignored by the corporate controlled MSM because there was lots of money to be made on the way up the debt-fueled bubbles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS