COMMENTS: 149
Moyers Journal: Madoff Was A Piker -- America's Big Banks Are a Far Larger Fraudulent Ponzi Scheme
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
Bill Moyers: For months now, revelations of the wholesale greed and blatant transgressions of Wall Street have reminded us that "The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is to Own One." In fact, the man you're about to meet wrote a book with just that title. It was based upon his experience as a tough regulator during one of the darkest chapters in our financial history: the savings and loan scandal in the late 1980s.
Bill Black was in New York for a conference at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice where scholars and journalists gathered to ask the question, "How do they get away with it?" Well, no one has asked that question more often than Bill Black. The former Director of the Institute for Fraud Prevention now teaches Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. During the savings and loan crisis, it was Black who accused then-house speaker Jim Wright and five US Senators, including John Glenn and John McCain, of doing favors for the S&L's in exchange for contributions and other perks. The senators got off with a slap on the wrist, but so enraged was one of those bankers, Charles Keating -- after whom the senate's so-called "Keating Five" were named -- he sent a memo that read, in part, "get Black -- kill him dead." Metaphorically, of course. Of course. Now Black is focused on an even greater scandal, and he spares no one -- not even the President he worked hard to elect, Barack Obama. But his main targets are the Wall Street barons, heirs of an earlier generation whose scandalous rip-offs of wealth back in the 1930s earned them comparison to Al Capone and the mob, and the nickname "banksters." Bill Black, welcome to the Journal.
William K. Black: Thank you.
Bill Moyers: I was taken with your candor at the conference here in New York to hear you say that this crisis we're going through, this economic and financial meltdown is driven by fraud. What's your definition of fraud?
Black: Fraud is deceit. And the essence of fraud is, "I create trust in you, and then I betray that trust, and get you to give me something of value." And as a result, there's no more effective acid against trust than fraud, especially fraud by top elites, and that's what we have.
Moyers: In your book, you make it clear that calculated dishonesty by people in charge is at the heart of most large corporate failures and scandals, including, of course, the S&L, but is that true? Is that what you're saying here, that it was in the boardrooms and the CEO offices where this fraud began?
Black: Absolutely.
Moyers: How did they do it? What do you mean?
Black: Well, the way that you do it is to make really bad loans, because they pay better. Then you grow extremely rapidly, in other words, you're a Ponzi-like scheme. And the third thing you do is we call it leverage. That just means borrowing a lot of money, and the combination creates a situation where you have guaranteed record profits in the early years. That makes you rich, through the bonuses that modern executive compensation has produced. It also makes it inevitable that there's going to be a disaster down the road.
Moyers: So you're suggesting, saying that CEOs of some of these banks and mortgage firms in order to increase their own personal income, deliberately set out to make bad loans?
Black: Yes.
Moyers: How do they get away with it? I mean, what about their own checks and balances in the company? What about their accounting divisions?
Black: All of those checks and balances report to the CEO, so if the CEO goes bad, all of the checks and balances are easily overcome. And the art form is not simply to defeat those internal controls, but to suborn them, to turn them into your greatest allies. And the bonus programs are exactly how you do that.
Moyers: If I wanted to go looking for the parties to this, with a good bird dog, where would you send me?
Black: Well, that's exactly what hasn't happened. We haven't looked, all right? The Bush Administration essentially got rid of regulation, so if nobody was looking, you were able to do this with impunity and that's exactly what happened. Where would you look? You'd look at the specialty lenders. The lenders that did almost all of their work in the sub-prime and what's called Alt-A, liars' loans.
Moyers: Yeah. Liars' loans--
Black: Liars' loans.
Moyers: Why did they call them liars' loans?
Black: Because they were liars' loans.
Moyers: And they knew it?
Black: They knew it. They knew that they were frauds.
Black: Liars' loans mean that we don't check. You tell us what your income is. You tell us what your job is. You tell us what your assets are, and we agree to believe you. We won't check on any of those things. And by the way, you get a better deal if you inflate your income and your job history and your assets.
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 6, 2009 12:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Black: Absolutely."
~~~~~
Everybody who has followed this crisis knows Geithner is guilty as sin ... everybody ... well except Barack !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Trillion Dollar Question?
Posted by: weathered
» RE: The Trillion Dollar Question?
Posted by: morganlafay1
» RE: The Trillion Dollar Question?
Posted by: DaBear
» Obama's staff and cabinet is full of the crooks
Posted by: Jim Swanson
» Obama is an agent of parasitism
Posted by: TrollTreason
» RE: So ..Obama, like Bush is a puppet
Posted by: ron heringhauser
» RE: i could not have said it better
Posted by: TrollTreason
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 6, 2009 12:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Go Figure
Posted by: weathered
» Enforce Term Limits!
Posted by: editnetwork
» You're wrong about term limits
Posted by: leighsure
» You're Right
Posted by: DrBrian
» WHEN DOES THE SHOOTING START?
Posted by: orda
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rolomax on Apr 6, 2009 1:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes me wonder about the future.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great article-Right NY Times??
Posted by: crazy carlos
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on Apr 6, 2009 2:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is disturbing because of its exposure of the malicious collaboration between the banksters and the Obama Administration.
It is disturbing because these disclosures prove beyond any possibility of argument the ugly truth that has been obvious to the nation's few genuine leftists for many years: that the sole purpose of government and governance at all levels in the United States is the propagation of capitalism by any means possible -- that is, the protection of the ruling class (the looters) and the methodical subjugation of all the rest of us (the looters' victims).
It is disturbing because it confirms all our worst fears -- that as the ruling class has looted us beyond any possibility of recovery, so have the Democrats and Republicans collaborated in creating the one-party state in which the ruling class is now all-powerful and liberty is betrayed beyond any prospect of restoration.
It is disturbing because Black and Moyer have proven to us that Obama is as much a fraud -- and as much a fraudster -- as any of his post-Kennedy predecessors.
It is disturbing because the entire Obama campaign of “change” is now exposed as the biggest Big Lie of all.
But what makes it the most profoundly disturbing news I have ever heard is that it is the death knell of a once-great nation, the admission that our future is naught but worsening misery and that any hope to the contrary is not only folly but dementia.
I am glad I am old; probably I will not live long enough to witness our reduction to the Somalia-type degradation to which the looters have inescapable condemned us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Stepford President
Posted by: Shehova
» Don't fool yourself...
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Don't fool yourself...
Posted by: monkeywrench
» Let's not forget 9/11
Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» Bush/ Cheney's "Get out of Jail Free" card.
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Let's not forget 9/11 - omg STFU already!
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: The Most Disturbing News of My Lifetime
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: The Most Disturbing News of My Lifetime
Posted by: morganlafay1
» RE: The Most Disturbing News of My Lifetime
Posted by: Sean Boi
» Ten-Point Program for Systemic Economic Transformation
Posted by: rebeccaphb
» sad that you didnt already know.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eloots on Apr 6, 2009 2:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A VERY nice one to read too is the following one:
The Big Takeover
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrGeneNelson on Apr 6, 2009 2:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Front page article:
...In one program, designed to restart small-business lending, President Obama's officials are planning to set up a middleman called a special-purpose vehicle -- a term made notorious during the Enron scandal -- or another type of entity to evade the congressional mandates, sources familiar with the matter said.
In another program, which seeks to restart consumer lending, a special entity was created largely for the separate purpose of getting around legal limits on the Federal Reserve, which is helping fund this initiative. The Fed does not ordinarily provide support for the markets that finance credit cards, auto loans and student loans but could channel the funds through a middleman....
Administration Seeks an Out On Bailout Rules for Firms
Officials Worry Constraints Set by Congress Deter Participation
By Amit R. Paley and David Cho
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, April 4, 2009; A01
_______
And five pages later:
Lawrence H. Summers, one of President Obama's top economic advisers, collected roughly $5.2 million in compensation from hedge fund D.E. Shaw over the past year and was paid more than $2.7 million in speaking fees by several troubled Wall Street firms and other organizations.....
....But Summers -- who, as chairman of the National Economic Council, is a leading architect of the administration's economic policies and helped shape the response to the global recession -- appears to have collected the most income. Financial institutions including JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch paid Summers for speaking appearances in 2008. Fees ranged from $45,000 for a Nov. 12 Merrill Lynch appearance to $135,000 for an April 16 visit to Goldman Sachs, according to his disclosure form. Summers reported donating two fees totaling $70,000, including the payment from Merrill Lynch, to charity.
In addition to his $5.2 million in salary and other compensation from D.E. Shaw, Summers received $586,996 in salary from Harvard University, where he is a president emeritus and worked as an economics professor until January, the document shows.
In 2008, Summers made a total of about 40 speeches to corporations, universities and other groups, even as he informally advised Obama's presidential campaign. But White House aides said the speeches occurred before he joined the Obama transition team in an official capacity last winter....
Top Economics Aide Discloses Income
Summers Earned Salary From Hedge Fund, Speaking Fees From Wall St. Firms
By Philip Rucker and Joe Stephens
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, April 4, 2009; A05
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe AlterNet Readers Aren't Supposed to See the Connection
Posted by: Alex Hidell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atheistcable on Apr 6, 2009 2:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should I tell them that they should tell Obama to fire Timothy Geithner? Or hold hearings?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What do I write to my Rep?
Posted by: warrior woman
» RE: What do I write to my Rep?
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» Incubents are dirty
Posted by: weathered
» RE: What do I write to my Rep?
Posted by: Aquinas
» You don't write, you show up
Posted by: orda
» RE: You don't write, you show up
Posted by: weathered
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 6, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Merchant Class in America has gone bad, pure and simple. This is my pet theory of the day, which I present for your amusement.
The last 30 years of U.S. history have been a demonstration of what happens when the merchants call the shots.
During Reagan's time, we learned that government was evil and business was good. Any guesses as to which societal class was cooking up these ideas?
"You know what?" they said. "Merchants really are the super-race, aren't they? Verily, everythingh should be run according to busainess principles, because the free market is the Perfect System and Capitalists are gods. If we do say so ourselves."
Thus the Republican Revolution was born.
I knew we were in deep doodoo when they started saying government was the problem and flying "trickle-down economics" as a brilliant idea. Ruh-uh!
Amazingly, Jefferson saw the seeds of the problem. It's a class warfare thing:
"Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
- Thomas Jefferson
Our job is simple, in conception if not in execution. We have to reign in the mercantile class in our country, which has turned criminal and declared war on the rest of us.
No more free enterprise. Crush the capitalist running dogs. That sort of thing. ;)
Xe
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Leave Jefferson Out of it: the Merchants he disliked were anarchists compared to AIG.
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Leave Jefferson Out of it: the Merchants he disliked were anarchists compared to AIG.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» Your faith in Trotsky is touching, and irrelevant
Posted by: bingahaba
» Kronstadt
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» The "Bolsheviks" were a Wall Street putsched fraud
Posted by: Man_vs_Kleptocracy
» RE: well said perry lets not forget about usury
Posted by: TrollTreason
» Are you insane?
Posted by: dustdevil
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Apr 6, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people who are taking the decisions have awarded themselves big salaries, big bonuses and obscene retirement deals while at the same time minimizing wages and benefits or--better yet--outsourcing jobs.
There are two ways this could have been prevented: (1) regulation of the corporation; and (2) democratization of the corporation.
If all employees had a say in decision-making, the corporation would be (at least somewhat) defensible. When the decisions are taken at the top, the deciders become "self-rewarding" and when they succeed without being restrained, they are heading for disaster. Janis's Groupthink will have created an illusion of invulnerability.
When I say that the politicians are ignorant, I think they haven't wanted to examine corporations too closely for fear of what they might find. And under duress? Election campaigns cost money.
Make corporations democratic and accountable. Abolish corporate donations (they ramp things up because most corps will donate to both sides). Limit campaign advertising to a few free media slots.
Better yet, ban political parties altogether! Guilty secrets (like Pelosi knowing about torture) make for bad government.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Apr 6, 2009 3:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because those who laugh at integrity hate you.
Don't kid yourself there's nothing nice about greedy weasel-rats. You'll see them, hear them on MSM/PBS/NPR.
They're faux scholarly scumbags. Enjoy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: willymack
» RE: Aging
Posted by: Cybershaman
» A Get Along Guy Can Go Far
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: melloe2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gazooks on Apr 6, 2009 4:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the basis of economy is covertly exploitive and inherently dependent on deception as is ours under POLITICAL control of the medium of exchange, and when the population is FORCED to accept credit slavery as the means to survival while the government insists that it's the good and fair way to prosperity and social equity, and when that same population is conditioned in virtually every supporting institution to the system as surrogates to perpetuation of myth, THAT society's days are and should be numbered.
WE live in denial for the mind-bending, ethics twisting satisfaction of a controlling elite driven by a mindless, meaningless, rampaging god of greed. Greed is GOD, or as Gordon Gecko explained to us two decades ago, greed is good.
Good for insuring blind acceptance of the continuum of the FRAUD that permeates our cultural body as a rampantly invasive cancer. It co-opts and controls through a saturating malignancy that feeds on itself in a frenzy of compromise.
From the now homeless, refinanced, insurance-less, diseased, divorced, armed and angry, Veteran auto worker to the most promising President in our national experience, the contagion is complete, the matrix absolute, and the certainty of our self imposed downfall is the only remaining and much deserved truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Apr 6, 2009 4:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By RON CHERNOW http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/
opinion/06chernow.html
Published: January 5, 2009
Note also this historical document:
Inside the R.F.C. -An adventure in secrecy
By John T. (John Thomas) Flynn January 1933 http://www.harpers.org/archive/1933/01/0018414
"The Congress which now presides over the dying months of President Hoover’s administration will, let us hope, bring to an end that fatuous adventure in secrecy which has stained the record of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. In the very act of its birth the R.F.C. was stricken dumb by the President. Thereafter for five months it passed round hundreds of millions of dollars of public money to banks and railroads without affording either to the public, or even to Congress itself, a grain of information about the identity of the objects of its bounty."
The characters have changed but the names are all the same.
Obama Adviser Paid Millions as Hedge Fund Director
Saturday 04 April 2009
by: | Visit article original @ The Associated Press http://www.truthout.org/040509Z
"Washington - Lawrence Summers, President Barack Obama's top economic adviser, earned millions over the past year as managing director of the hedge fund D.E. Shaw Group and through speaking fees, some from financial institutions now at the center of the government's rescue program.
Financial disclosure reports released by the White House show that Summers received $5.2 million from D.E. Shaw. He also reported payments for appearances before institutions such as J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers.
Overall, Summers was paid $2.7 million for more than 40 appearances before different organizations and companies, including financial institutions."
Sen. Bernie Sanders put a hold on the appointment of another Goldman Sachs alum to Obama's economic team. http://www.alternet.org/blogs/workplace/
134907/goldman_vet_sparks_conflict_on_
hill/?cID=1179449#c1179449
ENOUGH!
WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING! NOW!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beachcomberT on Apr 6, 2009 4:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: d1no on Apr 6, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.alternet.org/workplace/134392/pissed_off_at_the_corpor ate_banking_industry_here%27s_an_easy_way_you_can_hurt_them/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clutenbacher on Apr 6, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dover23 on Apr 6, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the so-called progressive movement was manipulated into supporting the elite's puppet.
Maybe it's time to always question authority, not just when the Daily Kos tells you to.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Maybe you were stuck picking the best of two evils!
Posted by: GerryAttric
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robertmc on Apr 6, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Apr 6, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
forget the banks... empty out what ever coffers you might still have and place it (them) with credit unions where you are a part owner... because of this fact, they are very cautious about what they are doing with YOUR $$...
raise hell with your elected officials about no more bailout $$ to anyone... get neighbors to do the same... threaten to not vote for them in the next round too...
refuse to cooperate with finacials who try to bully you... force them to produce the paperwork, make them prove they are right, stonewall them to the ends of the earth... this game can be played by both sides...
cut off spending outside of small owner operated businesses, yeah, know utilities can be a pain to shop around, but do your best to make sure the $$ you do spend stays in the community...
use your imagination about employment... if you feel upset about the way your company is operating... greed, exploitation, theft etc, see if you can start a small business out of the talents you have gained from employers and others... know this is a sore spot for most folks, but it is time to start thinking outside the box...
just for starters... if we turn out backs on the ponzi schemes, then where are they going to get the $$ to perpetuate the system??? we have to pay so they can play... and we all know the deck is totally stacked against us...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Apr 6, 2009 6:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has been busted over this time and again:
"It is absurd to claim that a progressive "movement" with a potential for profound social change can coalesce behind a candidate who repeatedly and reflexively aligns with the worst corporate malefactors on the planet, the very same individuals who brought about the current catastrophe."
Glen Ford (executive editor Black Agenda Report for the journal of African American political thought and action. October 15, 2008)
Likewise for ex-"Federal Reserve" Corp (not federal no reserves) Ponzi player Geithner and his Kleptocrats:
Geithner’s ‘Dirty Little Secret'
Geithner’s Oligarchs
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You, and other's, are whining like John McCain was a good...
Posted by: GerryAttric
» "Whining" for Obama or BushCo-McCain puppets are NOT solutions - you make NO POINT
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmndodge on Apr 6, 2009 6:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Urgelt on Apr 6, 2009 6:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When he leaves the profession, all that will be left are the "personalities," uncritical narcissists who think that First Lady fist-bumps are important news.
In their eagerness to harvest our 401Ks, the big banks, their lobbyists, and their paid-for congresscritters cut regulations left and right. But they made mistakes. They forgot the criminal statutes which define misrepresentation of an asset during sale as a criminal fraud, and they forgot the statutes requiring the FDIC to seize underwater banks. Those statutes are still on the books.
But of course, if you can corrupt the Administration, you can prevent those laws from being enforced. And that is exactly what they have done.
What I want from my President is a steady stream of buses from Wall Street to prisons. What I want from my President is FDIC seizure of underwater banks, not coddling and taxpayer subsidization. What I want from my President is enforcement of the laws of this nation, and my anger will not be appeased until I see these things happening.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Obama himself should be on the first bus
Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» " steady stream of buses from Wall Street to prisons"
Posted by: orda
» RE: Criminality
Posted by: riondluz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: knowbuddhaU on Apr 6, 2009 7:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we did to Chile, under the guidance of Kissinger, now we're doing to our selves.
Our lords of war are propagandizing us (thanks American Psychological Association ghouls, like we really needed to weaponize psyche itself); while our lords of finance are cannibalizing our bank accounts for their demonic profits.
Who are our own Chicago Boys?
NAOMI KLEIN: So, this plan was cooked up—it was between the head of USAID’s Chile office and the head of the University of Chicago’s Economics Department—to try to change the debate in Latin America, starting in Chile...
[...]
And so, the Chicago Boys were born. And it was considered a success, and the Ford Foundation got in on the funding. And hundreds and hundreds of Latin American students, on full scholarships, came to the University of Chicago in the 1950s and ’60s to study here to try to engage in what Juan Gabriel Valdes, Chile’s foreign minister after the dictatorship finally ended, described as a project of deliberate ideological transfer, taking these extreme-right ideas, that were seen as marginal even in the United States, and transplanting them to Latin America. That was his phrase—that is his phrase. Birth of the Chicago Boys
AMY GOODMAN: Well, before we go further, “economic hit men”—for those who haven’t heard you describe this, let alone describe yourself as this, what do you mean?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, really, I think it’s fair to say that since World War II, we economic hit men have managed to create the world’s first truly global empire, and we’ve done it primarily without the military, unlike other empires in history. We’ve done it through economics very subtly.
We work many different ways, but perhaps the most common one is that we will identify a third world country that has resources our corporations covet, such as oil, and then we arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations. The money never actually goes to the country. It goes instead to US corporations, who build big infrastructure projects—power grids, industrial parks, harbors, highways—things that benefit a few very rich people but do not reach the poor at all. The poor aren’t connected to the power grids. They don’t have the skills to get jobs in industrial parks. But they and the whole country are left holding this huge debt, and it’s such a big bet that the country can’t possibly repay it. So at some point in time, we economic hit men go back to the country and say, “Look, you know, you owe us a lot of money. You can’t pay your debt, so you’ve got to give us a pound of flesh.” Economic Hit Men Are Cannibalizing Us
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 6, 2009 7:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstuv on Apr 6, 2009 8:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oversight and Regulation enforcement was practically non-existent, despite its FDR mandate.
Put a child in a Candy Store without oversight and he/she will get a tummy-ache. Bankers are no different.
Once strong, willful, energetic, competent prosecutors head governmental agencies, Consumer Confidence will be restored and our economic calamity will diminish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Appoint strong prosecutors!
Posted by: grkjr
» Mukasey laughs in our face
Posted by: weathered
» You are one administration behind.
Posted by: GerryAttric
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ak47blog on Apr 6, 2009 8:06 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
visit http://www.greatcampcustommailbox.com/ak47popcorn2007blog
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: crazy carlos
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ak47blog
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ThomasG
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ak47blog
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: Beached Whale
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ak47blog
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 6, 2009 8:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Mark to market" is a rule that forces banks to value their deadbeat foreclosed houses at their actual market value, based on the prices that other homes in the neighborhood are actually fetching. If this accounting rule is applied, the Bank of America is bankrupt. So are lots of other banks and insurance companies. So, the Obama Administration in its wisdom has suspended accounting. Banks can now put any value on millions of empty houses that they please, and might stay in business for years after they have no actual money. Millions of phony-price houses will now sit vacant for years, because if the banks ever sell these white elephant houses they will instantly lose much of their phony value.
In a related development, ten million unemployed people have all self-valued their hourly wages (when they work) at $50.00/hour, and ten million unemployment checks will now be increased proportionally. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (that's a weirdo aphorism!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: docg on Apr 6, 2009 8:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However . . .
There is a reason the government is trying so hard to paper over the true depths of the problem facing us. It's all too easy to see the flaws in their thinking, and contemplate the possible corruption behind it -- and miss the much deeper abyss they are hiding even from themselves. And so many of us are also hiding from ourselves.
When they say that certain banks are "too big to fail," what they really mean is that failure to somehow prop up these banks by ANY means, fair OR foul, would lead to a catastrophe so huge that we have still not heard anyone even speculate about what the world would look like under such circumstances.
Since the economists picking at all the obvious holes in their strategy are certainly correct, the Ponzi scheme so desperately being maintained beyond all reason will in fact, sooner or later, totally collapse and we will inevitably be faced with the allegedly "unthinkable" catastrophe no one wants to talk about. http://amoleintheground.blogspot.com/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, it's all horribly true, but . . .
Posted by: cplot
» FDIC is no good? That is the catastrophe
Posted by: ps2987
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TrollTreason on Apr 6, 2009 8:24 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/business/ economy/news.php?q=1238961248
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: asifazad on Apr 6, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Obama Needs More Time
Posted by: ThomasG
» No he doesn't. He appointed Geithner, one of the crooks.
Posted by: GerryAttric
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TrollTreason on Apr 6, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13055
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Apr 6, 2009 8:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you click on his "Privacy Center" hyperlink, the server the link points to will install a keylogger on your computer, which is used to steal your credit card number, SSN, etc.
Please, report the comment to Alternet's staff.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ismac76 on Apr 6, 2009 8:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Asset bubbles? big suprise after we allow the creation of a class of super rich all looking for top investment returns thanks to all the offshoring, outsoucing, union busting, evicerated environmenatl regs.,tax breaks and Structural adjustemt programs at home and abroad that made them what they are. Maybe that requires a lesson from physics, gravity, like a helium baloon that eventually explodes right when it is at it's highest vantage point, and the lawn chair comes crashing back down...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cybershaman on Apr 6, 2009 8:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also had another friend, who was a really good person, fall into the same addiction and it did the same thing to him. He became totally self-obsessed and began justifying the worst in himself in order to get his fix.
I KNOW the upper eschelons of the business community loves their blow. I wonder how much of this 'greed is good' BS is due to the effects of this nationwide addiction. We may be dealing with a collective insanity borne of that need.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snowhound on Apr 6, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We don't need a gold standard
Posted by: ReallyBearish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ps2987 on Apr 6, 2009 9:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HaleAloha on Apr 6, 2009 9:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the most important reasons that the "banksters" have gotten away
with their schemes is that "relatively good" people have a hard time understanding how "relatively evil" some people can be. The people responsible for our current world political/economic situation and policies are responsible for causing the suffering and death of hundreds of thousands of ordinary folks around the globe. Do you really think that those kind of people would let Obama or any other President govern our nation without a gun to their head?!? Wake up and smell the gun powder and burning flesh!!!! If "We the People" don't stand up together and defend the Constitution and it's principles, no President has a chance to make any significant changes.
The first step is taking control of the "media" from those who would deceive us. The second step is a full and independent investigation into the "Crime of the Century" (so far), the destruction of the Twin Towers. Wise up Folks! It's time for civic action. If we wait for "leadership" to act, our once great and free nation is doomed!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tony D on Apr 6, 2009 9:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stewpro on Apr 6, 2009 11:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Apr 6, 2009 11:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com on Apr 6, 2009 12:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 6, 2009 1:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now it's quite easy for me as a lower-classer to imagine middlings concocting their incomes and job histories, but according to a 60 minutes interview with a Home Savings whistleblower a few months back, most of the subprime fraud and criminality was NOT on the part of people overstating their incomes. In FACT most people were straight up about their incomes, jobs and offered mammoth amounts of paper work to verify those figures. They were subsequently stunned in disbelief when the brokers told them, "you qualify"... we lowers know how the credit thing rolls, you apply, you get denied. It's usually a pipe-dream you do in desperation, a hail Mary to see if justice might just happen to you this time... just this once.
So when you get approved for a house you're only thought is, 'sonofabitch there is a god and I can move out of Jeffrey's trailer at long fuckin' last.'
According to the Home Savings dude, the bosses were racking up bonuses by telling their brokers to change the figures on the loans or to slam the few that did qualify for trad loans into subprimes because the firm could pull in $20K in fees not $5K in fees for the trad. If you were on the margins like most of the working poor and lowest middlings, you got slammed into subprimes on that basis alone. I can rattle off twenty-seven people that have erroneous credit reports because mortgage companies claimed to have had mortgages with those people when in fact those people never had loans with them or anyone else. No matter how hard they tried they couldn't get WaMu or whatever bank was listed to admit the borrower never had a loan with them. Contrary to popular middling kool-aid, credit reports do NOT EVER get fixed for lower class people. It's entirely up to the reporting creditor to make the change. Smell a rat in that? you bet.
Why was this done? Someone in the broker's office knew someone at WaMu/mortgage bank-du-jour who concocted it to make the borrower's FICO go down a hair lower so they "couldn't qualify" on paper for the trad.... even though a borrower's own credit union later told some of them, yeah, we'd have checked and taken your documentation as evidence (since WaMu/bank-du-jour had none, and didn't have to). But the Broker and her firm who stood to make at least $10K on the subprime really really wanted that borrower to have the subprime (and of course all on overpriced, highly overinflated condo prices... because houses were in the millions by then), all with the flippant justification, "well, they can just refi before the balloon payment hits anyway." (yeah, actual quote by many a broker in this mess).
Bottom line, the fraud and lying were on the part of brokers, mortgage banks and the Realty firms NOT the poor bastards (school teachers, artists, barristas, book store clerks, plumbers, studio property masters) who were swindled into thinking they and their young children could have a place to live other than a one bedroom apartment that looked like a third world leftover in the richest fucking country on earth.
I would love to hear more about the FBI loan fraud guys being taken off the case and if they were about to even find out about all that shit-level shoveling by those with all the power (banks, brokers and real estate agents).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The whole "liars loans" thing is a canard
Posted by: Beached Whale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Apr 6, 2009 1:27 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These capital markets provide liquidity to the entire system as well as fund consumer purchases of goods provided through the global supply chains whose manufacturing centers are increasingly in low wage areas like China. Thus, the new global capital markets are part of an institutional arrangement that is more appropriate to corporate globalization than the old middle class based national systems of production that relied on highly regulated domestic banking systems. Globalization, with its destruction of the middle classes of advanced capitalist countries, relies on global capital markets to fund consumption; progressive taxation and growing real middle class incomes are replaced by credit and the financialization of the global economy. The result is high levels of income and wealth concentration along with growing government deficits resulting from tax cuts for the rich, privatization of many public services, the end of the social safety net and union busting. Decreasing effective consumer demand increases demand slows growth. Low real wages increase demand for credit to sustain the economy and borrowing by consumers grows and produces high profits in the financial industry. The rich invest in various financial instruments and financial innovation responds to large institutional investors searching for outlets for surplus capital. Government deficits grow in order to subsidize tax cuts.
Placing the blame on the average American who "lives beyond his/her means" is wrong. This entire strategy was an institutional arrangement to facilitate corporate globalization in order to shift income and wealth from the middle and working classes to the corporate rich in a post-Fordist world high productivity and low real wages. Working families borrowed to fund consumption at high real rates of interest. Their loans were packaged together with other similar ones and sold as securities in global markets. This temporarily spread risk, sustained liquidity and gained quick profits for commercial lenders and financial investors. The contradiction was not just increased risk; it was the steady reliance on an increasingly impoverished middle class to continue payments on loans that underlay the securities sold in global financial markets. Stock and housing price bubbles burst and defaults occured. The entire system unraveled quickly and now a depression looms on the horizen.
The problem isn't corruption, the Fed or poor management although all these play a significant role. The real problem is the greed that led to a war on the incomes of the middle and working classes that led to financialization and the chronic stagnation which is now at the heart of the crisis. Borrowing replaced real earnings as a basis of consumption and growth. Only progressive taxation, financial regulation, public investment and a restoration of the social safety net can reverse the current crisis.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inspired1 on Apr 6, 2009 1:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, where are they now? Did they grow up, develop consciences and wither away...?
Need I answer this question?? The non-regulated market, Congress-for-sale, and globalization made all that stuff quaint, as well as unnecessary.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Apr 6, 2009 1:41 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people still feel that the financial gurus who got us here can get us out. Greenspan, Rubin, Summers, Geitner, Weill, Paulson, and Phil Gramm (just to name a few) all support policies of mass privatization and have merely shuffled these toxic assets around and forced the taxpayer to foot the bill.
But that is just a piece of the puzzle. The banksters have gained unbelievable power and control through their usury and established excessive interest rates that are built into our monetary policy.
The debt itself is the illusion. The question is not only why these fraudulent bankers are not prosecuted but why we choose to pay this debt at all. The interest does not go to the community, only a small fraction of it will be used for the benefit of the whole and our government is saying that it is American capitalism that they are protecting not the fortunes of the elite who control our military, access to a productive healthy food supply, our energy, and our currency.
Are we in the land of the free?
Whatever they do with the money Americans will be under the yoke of this for generations.
It is my belief that our banking system is a form of slavery and those in power will use all their available resources to not only keep it alive but further concentrate power through single world currencies and IMF banking practices.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inanaturallight on Apr 6, 2009 1:52 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://cyberjournal.org/authors/fresia/
It's thoroughly referenced and near as I can tell it's the most accurate of the historical accounts. NONE of what we see now is anything outside of the design handed down to us by the "fathers of the country". We're fascist by design.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peter g on Apr 6, 2009 1:53 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop buying crap you don't need, stop watching tv and stop believing anybody who says they can fix it.
Thats, when things will change, and only then.
peter g
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usedtobesupermom on Apr 6, 2009 1:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ThomasG on Apr 6, 2009 1:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also think that BRIDGE BANKS chartered and funded with balance sheets free of toxic assets are a necessary requirement.
Markets made out of discounted capital assets of those who created the banking and economic collapse are also a necessary requirement.
Markets for discounted capital assets will create deflation.
Printing money to fund BRIDGE BANKS will create inflation.
If markets are made out of bankrupt capital assets and money is printed to fund BRIDGE BANKS, inflationary forces can be counterbalanced by deflationary forces that will allow our economy to become more competitive with Asia, and allow resources to reindustrialize our economy, so that we are no longer limited to being consumers in a mercantile economy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inspired1 on Apr 6, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shouldn't we be ready now to support a political party that basically agrees with William Black's assessments on these issues? One that needs no coaxing nor prompting to do something about it? No petitions and calls that get ignored?
Don't we need an actual party to accumulate and express the people's will on going after the Wall street gang and the so-called regulators? Why should we have to beg and cajole for what is right and decent and ... well, obvious.
Maybe it's time to stop trying to "inject" morals into compromised, corporate-funded parties that could care less, and START building from a moral high ground with a sustainable vision of democracy in the workplace, in the marketplace, at the doctor's office, and at home. Ya' gotta start somewhere, and it looks like Green Party to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Apr 6, 2009 3:07 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
impression of Barak Obama was one of hope, change, hopefully a little independence of thought and deed. I was ready to extend time and patience for the transition of President. This is not working, as I concluded with the team of economic advisors, Summers, Giethner, Volker,
keeping,but shuffling, the same military advisors, Gates, Patraeous, etc......., maintaining the same aggressive stance in the middle east, giving the future of succeeding generations to thieves and con men, letting corporations have their way with our society. I have not seen any hope or change from this administration, just the same corporate controlled domination of the populace,
keeping control of the masses.
Now we are moving our military presence into Afghanistan, soon Pakistan, I was
hoping to see something other than an embracing of the status quo, but then I remembered that
our country elected a corporate candidate. I would hope that by this time the population would have awakened to the corporate shenanigans that have been so redundant throughout this
country's history, but then I thought about the collective attention span of America.
The time is ripe for us to stop the political complicit behavior, to adopt the Ralph Nader suggestion of a 1/10 of one percent tax on all stock transactions, to stop the sacrificing of this country's future to the perpetraitors of economic collapse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Apr 6, 2009 3:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is normal to take advantage where opportunity is given. Only the most saintly among us would not have done as the banksters and fraudsters did.
Now, a new president has been bamboozled by the mythical market and he's appointed the foxes to fix the chicken coop. Poor man! What's a poor guy to do? The banksters control the country and its politicians, and they got their man into the Treasury department and the Fed and as economic advisers--and they're all trying to keep a dead banking system propped up.
The big question out of all of this is: Do we need a banking system? Do we need any banks? Why not get rid of the lot of them, particularly the insolvent ones, jail the banksters, confiscate their ill-gotten gains, and stop throwing money down the drain. The Fed needs to be abolished, Geithner needs to be fired, Summers needs to be thrown out on his ear.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Garvagh on Apr 6, 2009 4:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US financial system made as little sense as Bush administration foreign policy in the Middle East and Central Asia, squandering trillions of dollars on unnecessary wars.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 6, 2009 6:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marid on Apr 6, 2009 7:24 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved the Credit Union idea and will pursue it quickly.
This link has a synopsis and interview but my buddy went through the hassle of scanning it for me. I am copying it and passing it around. Sorry Harper's the people need to know. Start the Revolution Now! Abolish Corporations Now!
www.democracynow.org/2009/3/24
First article in list.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great Harpers Article
Posted by: beijaflor
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: independent1 on Apr 6, 2009 11:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only ideology that will save us is the ideology of self-pride and self-respect which comes from growing up in these United States. We CANNOT ALLOW the super rich and their politician cat's paws to gut us as they are more than halfway to doing.
What I don't see here is any rallying cry: we must take personal responsibility for raising the cry against the outrage described by Professor Black. It's NOT Capitalism that's evil: it's the people using it in criminal ways and those WE elect who help them.
It's time for the TV and Internet journalists to start doing their job: bringing this news to the forefront and keeping it there. Where is True Majority and Common Cause? Why aren't they using their power to organize the public on this issue? There should be phone-in and email campaigns directed at every Congressional member and at the White House. There should be demonstrations in the streets!
Professor Black's remedy works: these corporations should all be put in receivership, the crooked managers should be indicted, fined, imprisoned.
I'm sick of all the infighting and snarky remarks and all the "shrugging shoulders" I see: is THAT all we've got? United, under the law and in the spirit of Americanism, we can revive and recapture this economy. If we let it slide any further, it will disappear down the Tunnel of No Return.
I won't live to see that: because I'll be in the forefront, demanding that the right thing be done - and that the "right thing" be maintained now and for as long as History will allow. We have never been a "Mañana" people and this situation must be addressed and fixed NOW. Start asking questions and demanding answers, demanding action!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: satwa.gunam on Apr 7, 2009 12:11 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Overspending by the common people taking advantage of the cheap credit available at the time of purchase, without thing of the cost of funds going up subsequently.
2. Fed blindly moving down the interest rates to increase consumption or increasing interest rate in fear of inflation. They had not thought of the balloning effect of interest rates on the already over leveraged common american.
This reminds me of a fable. Once a king wanted to display to his people their dishonesty. He built a big pond and asked all the people to pour one cup of milk.
All people thought other will pour milk and he can get away with pouring water. Next day morning the pond was with clean water.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: satwa.gunam
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: Beached Whale
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: satwa.gunam
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: satwa.gunam
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: uncleeddie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: common intelligence on Apr 7, 2009 4:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if Money is nothing more than digital computer entries, Why do people put These digital entries in a bank?,... to give them credibility?
Do we have no tools to keep our own digital entries in our own pocket instead of the banks being the only holders of these?
We have to think around the possessing of our collected personal moneys so that we are not made (all ready are) to accept the banks as the clearing house for our worth, therefore our worthiness as human beings.
Funny how Obama's going around the world asking people, "listening" to their concerns but doesn't listen to this country and disregards our input as unworthy of consideration.
I mean how many of you have been allowed to your constitutional right to address this country with a "redress of grievances"?
How many even know how to do it?
Congress , I have asked won't even answer any specific questions. They just reply in form letters to general whining. Like the gang letteres the "PEN" Ask you to send via a form emailing.
The only way we are going to get any recognition is to stop all of commerce collectively with a very specific demand to have the bastards sit down for as long as it takes and let us grill their asses until they start giving answers.
Let me tell you they are getting scared.
Really Scared.
And if we start raising some real ruckuses they are going to be forced to listen...not to our "representatives", but to us as individuals.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VaFonCulo on Apr 7, 2009 8:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This and rampant corruption at Fannie Mae ,coupled with ZERO regulation during the BUSH years are just as complicit in the creation and propagation of this shit storm.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What about the CDRA and Fannie Mae ?
Posted by: satwa.gunam
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wildbill on Apr 7, 2009 10:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mein kampf on Apr 8, 2009 2:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» whats up with the Hitler handle?
Posted by: drugs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uncleeddie on Apr 9, 2009 4:02 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Alex Jones is a fraud - sane, intelligent & RATIONAL people know this
Posted by: techcafe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ak47blog on Apr 9, 2009 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
website: http://www.greatcampcustommailbox.com/ak47popcorn2007blog/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: troy on Apr 9, 2009 6:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stupidity rules!
TRC
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joebanana on Apr 14, 2009 7:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 6, 2009 12:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Black: Absolutely."
~~~~~
Everybody who has followed this crisis knows Geithner is guilty as sin ... everybody ... well except Barack !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Trillion Dollar Question?
Posted by: weathered
» RE: The Trillion Dollar Question?
Posted by: morganlafay1
» RE: The Trillion Dollar Question?
Posted by: DaBear
» Obama's staff and cabinet is full of the crooks
Posted by: Jim Swanson
» Obama is an agent of parasitism
Posted by: TrollTreason
» RE: So ..Obama, like Bush is a puppet
Posted by: ron heringhauser
» RE: i could not have said it better
Posted by: TrollTreason
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 6, 2009 12:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Go Figure
Posted by: weathered
» Enforce Term Limits!
Posted by: editnetwork
» You're wrong about term limits
Posted by: leighsure
» You're Right
Posted by: DrBrian
» WHEN DOES THE SHOOTING START?
Posted by: orda
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rolomax on Apr 6, 2009 1:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes me wonder about the future.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great article-Right NY Times??
Posted by: crazy carlos
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on Apr 6, 2009 2:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is disturbing because of its exposure of the malicious collaboration between the banksters and the Obama Administration.
It is disturbing because these disclosures prove beyond any possibility of argument the ugly truth that has been obvious to the nation's few genuine leftists for many years: that the sole purpose of government and governance at all levels in the United States is the propagation of capitalism by any means possible -- that is, the protection of the ruling class (the looters) and the methodical subjugation of all the rest of us (the looters' victims).
It is disturbing because it confirms all our worst fears -- that as the ruling class has looted us beyond any possibility of recovery, so have the Democrats and Republicans collaborated in creating the one-party state in which the ruling class is now all-powerful and liberty is betrayed beyond any prospect of restoration.
It is disturbing because Black and Moyer have proven to us that Obama is as much a fraud -- and as much a fraudster -- as any of his post-Kennedy predecessors.
It is disturbing because the entire Obama campaign of “change” is now exposed as the biggest Big Lie of all.
But what makes it the most profoundly disturbing news I have ever heard is that it is the death knell of a once-great nation, the admission that our future is naught but worsening misery and that any hope to the contrary is not only folly but dementia.
I am glad I am old; probably I will not live long enough to witness our reduction to the Somalia-type degradation to which the looters have inescapable condemned us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Stepford President
Posted by: Shehova
» Don't fool yourself...
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Don't fool yourself...
Posted by: monkeywrench
» Let's not forget 9/11
Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» Bush/ Cheney's "Get out of Jail Free" card.
Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: Let's not forget 9/11 - omg STFU already!
Posted by: techcafe
» RE: The Most Disturbing News of My Lifetime
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: The Most Disturbing News of My Lifetime
Posted by: morganlafay1
» RE: The Most Disturbing News of My Lifetime
Posted by: Sean Boi
» Ten-Point Program for Systemic Economic Transformation
Posted by: rebeccaphb
» sad that you didnt already know.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eloots on Apr 6, 2009 2:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A VERY nice one to read too is the following one:
The Big Takeover
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrGeneNelson on Apr 6, 2009 2:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Front page article:
...In one program, designed to restart small-business lending, President Obama's officials are planning to set up a middleman called a special-purpose vehicle -- a term made notorious during the Enron scandal -- or another type of entity to evade the congressional mandates, sources familiar with the matter said.
In another program, which seeks to restart consumer lending, a special entity was created largely for the separate purpose of getting around legal limits on the Federal Reserve, which is helping fund this initiative. The Fed does not ordinarily provide support for the markets that finance credit cards, auto loans and student loans but could channel the funds through a middleman....
Administration Seeks an Out On Bailout Rules for Firms
Officials Worry Constraints Set by Congress Deter Participation
By Amit R. Paley and David Cho
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, April 4, 2009; A01
_______
And five pages later:
Lawrence H. Summers, one of President Obama's top economic advisers, collected roughly $5.2 million in compensation from hedge fund D.E. Shaw over the past year and was paid more than $2.7 million in speaking fees by several troubled Wall Street firms and other organizations.....
....But Summers -- who, as chairman of the National Economic Council, is a leading architect of the administration's economic policies and helped shape the response to the global recession -- appears to have collected the most income. Financial institutions including JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch paid Summers for speaking appearances in 2008. Fees ranged from $45,000 for a Nov. 12 Merrill Lynch appearance to $135,000 for an April 16 visit to Goldman Sachs, according to his disclosure form. Summers reported donating two fees totaling $70,000, including the payment from Merrill Lynch, to charity.
In addition to his $5.2 million in salary and other compensation from D.E. Shaw, Summers received $586,996 in salary from Harvard University, where he is a president emeritus and worked as an economics professor until January, the document shows.
In 2008, Summers made a total of about 40 speeches to corporations, universities and other groups, even as he informally advised Obama's presidential campaign. But White House aides said the speeches occurred before he joined the Obama transition team in an official capacity last winter....
Top Economics Aide Discloses Income
Summers Earned Salary From Hedge Fund, Speaking Fees From Wall St. Firms
By Philip Rucker and Joe Stephens
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, April 4, 2009; A05
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe AlterNet Readers Aren't Supposed to See the Connection
Posted by: Alex Hidell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atheistcable on Apr 6, 2009 2:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should I tell them that they should tell Obama to fire Timothy Geithner? Or hold hearings?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What do I write to my Rep?
Posted by: warrior woman
» RE: What do I write to my Rep?
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» Incubents are dirty
Posted by: weathered
» RE: What do I write to my Rep?
Posted by: Aquinas
» You don't write, you show up
Posted by: orda
» RE: You don't write, you show up
Posted by: weathered
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 6, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Merchant Class in America has gone bad, pure and simple. This is my pet theory of the day, which I present for your amusement.
The last 30 years of U.S. history have been a demonstration of what happens when the merchants call the shots.
During Reagan's time, we learned that government was evil and business was good. Any guesses as to which societal class was cooking up these ideas?
"You know what?" they said. "Merchants really are the super-race, aren't they? Verily, everythingh should be run according to busainess principles, because the free market is the Perfect System and Capitalists are gods. If we do say so ourselves."
Thus the Republican Revolution was born.
I knew we were in deep doodoo when they started saying government was the problem and flying "trickle-down economics" as a brilliant idea. Ruh-uh!
Amazingly, Jefferson saw the seeds of the problem. It's a class warfare thing:
"Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
- Thomas Jefferson
Our job is simple, in conception if not in execution. We have to reign in the mercantile class in our country, which has turned criminal and declared war on the rest of us.
No more free enterprise. Crush the capitalist running dogs. That sort of thing. ;)
Xe
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Leave Jefferson Out of it: the Merchants he disliked were anarchists compared to AIG.
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Leave Jefferson Out of it: the Merchants he disliked were anarchists compared to AIG.
Posted by: Cybershaman
» Your faith in Trotsky is touching, and irrelevant
Posted by: bingahaba
» Kronstadt
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» The "Bolsheviks" were a Wall Street putsched fraud
Posted by: Man_vs_Kleptocracy
» RE: well said perry lets not forget about usury
Posted by: TrollTreason
» Are you insane?
Posted by: dustdevil
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Apr 6, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people who are taking the decisions have awarded themselves big salaries, big bonuses and obscene retirement deals while at the same time minimizing wages and benefits or--better yet--outsourcing jobs.
There are two ways this could have been prevented: (1) regulation of the corporation; and (2) democratization of the corporation.
If all employees had a say in decision-making, the corporation would be (at least somewhat) defensible. When the decisions are taken at the top, the deciders become "self-rewarding" and when they succeed without being restrained, they are heading for disaster. Janis's Groupthink will have created an illusion of invulnerability.
When I say that the politicians are ignorant, I think they haven't wanted to examine corporations too closely for fear of what they might find. And under duress? Election campaigns cost money.
Make corporations democratic and accountable. Abolish corporate donations (they ramp things up because most corps will donate to both sides). Limit campaign advertising to a few free media slots.
Better yet, ban political parties altogether! Guilty secrets (like Pelosi knowing about torture) make for bad government.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Apr 6, 2009 3:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
because those who laugh at integrity hate you.
Don't kid yourself there's nothing nice about greedy weasel-rats. You'll see them, hear them on MSM/PBS/NPR.
They're faux scholarly scumbags. Enjoy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: willymack
» RE: Aging
Posted by: Cybershaman
» A Get Along Guy Can Go Far
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: weathered
» RE: Carter is a Pompous Hypocrite
Posted by: melloe2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gazooks on Apr 6, 2009 4:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the basis of economy is covertly exploitive and inherently dependent on deception as is ours under POLITICAL control of the medium of exchange, and when the population is FORCED to accept credit slavery as the means to survival while the government insists that it's the good and fair way to prosperity and social equity, and when that same population is conditioned in virtually every supporting institution to the system as surrogates to perpetuation of myth, THAT society's days are and should be numbered.
WE live in denial for the mind-bending, ethics twisting satisfaction of a controlling elite driven by a mindless, meaningless, rampaging god of greed. Greed is GOD, or as Gordon Gecko explained to us two decades ago, greed is good.
Good for insuring blind acceptance of the continuum of the FRAUD that permeates our cultural body as a rampantly invasive cancer. It co-opts and controls through a saturating malignancy that feeds on itself in a frenzy of compromise.
From the now homeless, refinanced, insurance-less, diseased, divorced, armed and angry, Veteran auto worker to the most promising President in our national experience, the contagion is complete, the matrix absolute, and the certainty of our self imposed downfall is the only remaining and much deserved truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Apr 6, 2009 4:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By RON CHERNOW http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/
opinion/06chernow.html
Published: January 5, 2009
Note also this historical document:
Inside the R.F.C. -An adventure in secrecy
By John T. (John Thomas) Flynn January 1933 http://www.harpers.org/archive/1933/01/0018414
"The Congress which now presides over the dying months of President Hoover’s administration will, let us hope, bring to an end that fatuous adventure in secrecy which has stained the record of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. In the very act of its birth the R.F.C. was stricken dumb by the President. Thereafter for five months it passed round hundreds of millions of dollars of public money to banks and railroads without affording either to the public, or even to Congress itself, a grain of information about the identity of the objects of its bounty."
The characters have changed but the names are all the same.
Obama Adviser Paid Millions as Hedge Fund Director
Saturday 04 April 2009
by: | Visit article original @ The Associated Press http://www.truthout.org/040509Z
"Washington - Lawrence Summers, President Barack Obama's top economic adviser, earned millions over the past year as managing director of the hedge fund D.E. Shaw Group and through speaking fees, some from financial institutions now at the center of the government's rescue program.
Financial disclosure reports released by the White House show that Summers received $5.2 million from D.E. Shaw. He also reported payments for appearances before institutions such as J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers.
Overall, Summers was paid $2.7 million for more than 40 appearances before different organizations and companies, including financial institutions."
Sen. Bernie Sanders put a hold on the appointment of another Goldman Sachs alum to Obama's economic team. http://www.alternet.org/blogs/workplace/
134907/goldman_vet_sparks_conflict_on_
hill/?cID=1179449#c1179449
ENOUGH!
WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING! NOW!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beachcomberT on Apr 6, 2009 4:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: d1no on Apr 6, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.alternet.org/workplace/134392/pissed_off_at_the_corpor ate_banking_industry_here%27s_an_easy_way_you_can_hurt_them/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clutenbacher on Apr 6, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dover23 on Apr 6, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the so-called progressive movement was manipulated into supporting the elite's puppet.
Maybe it's time to always question authority, not just when the Daily Kos tells you to.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maybe
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Maybe you were stuck picking the best of two evils!
Posted by: GerryAttric
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robertmc on Apr 6, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Apr 6, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
forget the banks... empty out what ever coffers you might still have and place it (them) with credit unions where you are a part owner... because of this fact, they are very cautious about what they are doing with YOUR $$...
raise hell with your elected officials about no more bailout $$ to anyone... get neighbors to do the same... threaten to not vote for them in the next round too...
refuse to cooperate with finacials who try to bully you... force them to produce the paperwork, make them prove they are right, stonewall them to the ends of the earth... this game can be played by both sides...
cut off spending outside of small owner operated businesses, yeah, know utilities can be a pain to shop around, but do your best to make sure the $$ you do spend stays in the community...
use your imagination about employment... if you feel upset about the way your company is operating... greed, exploitation, theft etc, see if you can start a small business out of the talents you have gained from employers and others... know this is a sore spot for most folks, but it is time to start thinking outside the box...
just for starters... if we turn out backs on the ponzi schemes, then where are they going to get the $$ to perpetuate the system??? we have to pay so they can play... and we all know the deck is totally stacked against us...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Apr 6, 2009 6:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama has been busted over this time and again:
"It is absurd to claim that a progressive "movement" with a potential for profound social change can coalesce behind a candidate who repeatedly and reflexively aligns with the worst corporate malefactors on the planet, the very same individuals who brought about the current catastrophe."
Glen Ford (executive editor Black Agenda Report for the journal of African American political thought and action. October 15, 2008)
Likewise for ex-"Federal Reserve" Corp (not federal no reserves) Ponzi player Geithner and his Kleptocrats:
Geithner’s ‘Dirty Little Secret'
Geithner’s Oligarchs
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You, and other's, are whining like John McCain was a good...
Posted by: GerryAttric
» "Whining" for Obama or BushCo-McCain puppets are NOT solutions - you make NO POINT
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmndodge on Apr 6, 2009 6:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Urgelt on Apr 6, 2009 6:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When he leaves the profession, all that will be left are the "personalities," uncritical narcissists who think that First Lady fist-bumps are important news.
In their eagerness to harvest our 401Ks, the big banks, their lobbyists, and their paid-for congresscritters cut regulations left and right. But they made mistakes. They forgot the criminal statutes which define misrepresentation of an asset during sale as a criminal fraud, and they forgot the statutes requiring the FDIC to seize underwater banks. Those statutes are still on the books.
But of course, if you can corrupt the Administration, you can prevent those laws from being enforced. And that is exactly what they have done.
What I want from my President is a steady stream of buses from Wall Street to prisons. What I want from my President is FDIC seizure of underwater banks, not coddling and taxpayer subsidization. What I want from my President is enforcement of the laws of this nation, and my anger will not be appeased until I see these things happening.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Obama himself should be on the first bus
Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» " steady stream of buses from Wall Street to prisons"
Posted by: orda
» RE: Criminality
Posted by: riondluz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: knowbuddhaU on Apr 6, 2009 7:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we did to Chile, under the guidance of Kissinger, now we're doing to our selves.
Our lords of war are propagandizing us (thanks American Psychological Association ghouls, like we really needed to weaponize psyche itself); while our lords of finance are cannibalizing our bank accounts for their demonic profits.
Who are our own Chicago Boys?
NAOMI KLEIN: So, this plan was cooked up—it was between the head of USAID’s Chile office and the head of the University of Chicago’s Economics Department—to try to change the debate in Latin America, starting in Chile...
[...]
And so, the Chicago Boys were born. And it was considered a success, and the Ford Foundation got in on the funding. And hundreds and hundreds of Latin American students, on full scholarships, came to the University of Chicago in the 1950s and ’60s to study here to try to engage in what Juan Gabriel Valdes, Chile’s foreign minister after the dictatorship finally ended, described as a project of deliberate ideological transfer, taking these extreme-right ideas, that were seen as marginal even in the United States, and transplanting them to Latin America. That was his phrase—that is his phrase. Birth of the Chicago Boys
AMY GOODMAN: Well, before we go further, “economic hit men”—for those who haven’t heard you describe this, let alone describe yourself as this, what do you mean?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, really, I think it’s fair to say that since World War II, we economic hit men have managed to create the world’s first truly global empire, and we’ve done it primarily without the military, unlike other empires in history. We’ve done it through economics very subtly.
We work many different ways, but perhaps the most common one is that we will identify a third world country that has resources our corporations covet, such as oil, and then we arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations. The money never actually goes to the country. It goes instead to US corporations, who build big infrastructure projects—power grids, industrial parks, harbors, highways—things that benefit a few very rich people but do not reach the poor at all. The poor aren’t connected to the power grids. They don’t have the skills to get jobs in industrial parks. But they and the whole country are left holding this huge debt, and it’s such a big bet that the country can’t possibly repay it. So at some point in time, we economic hit men go back to the country and say, “Look, you know, you owe us a lot of money. You can’t pay your debt, so you’ve got to give us a pound of flesh.” Economic Hit Men Are Cannibalizing Us
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 6, 2009 7:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstuv on Apr 6, 2009 8:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oversight and Regulation enforcement was practically non-existent, despite its FDR mandate.
Put a child in a Candy Store without oversight and he/she will get a tummy-ache. Bankers are no different.
Once strong, willful, energetic, competent prosecutors head governmental agencies, Consumer Confidence will be restored and our economic calamity will diminish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Appoint strong prosecutors!
Posted by: grkjr
» Mukasey laughs in our face
Posted by: weathered
» You are one administration behind.
Posted by: GerryAttric
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ak47blog on Apr 6, 2009 8:06 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
visit http://www.greatcampcustommailbox.com/ak47popcorn2007blog
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: crazy carlos
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ak47blog
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ThomasG
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ak47blog
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: Beached Whale
» RE: More subterfuge from mainstream media
Posted by: ak47blog
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 6, 2009 8:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Mark to market" is a rule that forces banks to value their deadbeat foreclosed houses at their actual market value, based on the prices that other homes in the neighborhood are actually fetching. If this accounting rule is applied, the Bank of America is bankrupt. So are lots of other banks and insurance companies. So, the Obama Administration in its wisdom has suspended accounting. Banks can now put any value on millions of empty houses that they please, and might stay in business for years after they have no actual money. Millions of phony-price houses will now sit vacant for years, because if the banks ever sell these white elephant houses they will instantly lose much of their phony value.
In a related development, ten million unemployed people have all self-valued their hourly wages (when they work) at $50.00/hour, and ten million unemployment checks will now be increased proportionally. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (that's a weirdo aphorism!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: docg on Apr 6, 2009 8:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However . . .
There is a reason the government is trying so hard to paper over the true depths of the problem facing us. It's all too easy to see the flaws in their thinking, and contemplate the possible corruption behind it -- and miss the much deeper abyss they are hiding even from themselves. And so many of us are also hiding from ourselves.
When they say that certain banks are "too big to fail," what they really mean is that failure to somehow prop up these banks by ANY means, fair OR foul, would lead to a catastrophe so huge that we have still not heard anyone even speculate about what the world would look like under such circumstances.
Since the economists picking at all the obvious holes in their strategy are certainly correct, the Ponzi scheme so desperately being maintained beyond all reason will in fact, sooner or later, totally collapse and we will inevitably be faced with the allegedly "unthinkable" catastrophe no one wants to talk about. http://amoleintheground.blogspot.com/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, it's all horribly true, but . . .
Posted by: cplot
» FDIC is no good? That is the catastrophe
Posted by: ps2987
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TrollTreason on Apr 6, 2009 8:24 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/business/ economy/news.php?q=1238961248
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: asifazad on Apr 6, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Obama Needs More Time
Posted by: ThomasG
» No he doesn't. He appointed Geithner, one of the crooks.
Posted by: GerryAttric
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TrollTreason on Apr 6, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13055
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Apr 6, 2009 8:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you click on his "Privacy Center" hyperlink, the server the link points to will install a keylogger on your computer, which is used to steal your credit card number, SSN, etc.
Please, report the comment to Alternet's staff.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ismac76 on Apr 6, 2009 8:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Asset bubbles? big suprise after we allow the creation of a class of super rich all looking for top investment returns thanks to all the offshoring, outsoucing, union busting, evicerated environmenatl regs.,tax breaks and Structural adjustemt programs at home and abroad that made them what they are. Maybe that requires a lesson from physics, gravity, like a helium baloon that eventually explodes right when it is at it's highest vantage point, and the lawn chair comes crashing back down...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cybershaman on Apr 6, 2009 8:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also had another friend, who was a really good person, fall into the same addiction and it did the same thing to him. He became totally self-obsessed and began justifying the worst in himself in order to get his fix.
I KNOW the upper eschelons of the business community loves their blow. I wonder how much of this 'greed is good' BS is due to the effects of this nationwide addiction. We may be dealing with a collective insanity borne of that need.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snowhound on Apr 6, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We don't need a gold standard
Posted by: ReallyBearish
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ps2987 on Apr 6, 2009 9:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HaleAloha on Apr 6, 2009 9:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the most important reasons that the "banksters" have gotten away
with their schemes is that "relatively good" people have a hard time understanding how "relatively evil" some people can be. The people responsible for our current world political/economic situation and policies are responsible for causing the suffering and death of hundreds of thousands of ordinary folks around the globe. Do you really think that those kind of people would let Obama or any other President govern our nation without a gun to their head?!? Wake up and smell the gun powder and burning flesh!!!! If "We the People" don't stand up together and defend the Constitution and it's principles, no President has a chance to make any significant changes.
The first step is taking control of the "media" from those who would deceive us. The second step is a full and independent investigation into the "Crime of the Century" (so far), the destruction of the Twin Towers. Wise up Folks! It's time for civic action. If we wait for "leadership" to act, our once great and free nation is doomed!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tony D on Apr 6, 2009 9:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stewpro on Apr 6, 2009 11:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Apr 6, 2009 11:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com on Apr 6, 2009 12:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 6, 2009 1:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now it's quite easy for me as a lower-classer to imagine middlings concocting their incomes and job histories, but according to a 60 minutes interview with a Home Savings whistleblower a few months back, most of the subprime fraud and criminality was NOT on the part of people overstating their incomes. In FACT most people were straight up about their incomes, jobs and offered mammoth amounts of paper work to verify those figures. They were subsequently stunned in disbelief when the brokers told them, "you qualify"... we lowers know how the credit thing rolls, you apply, you get denied. It's usually a pipe-dream you do in desperation, a hail Mary to see if justice might just happen to you this time... just this once.
So when you get approved for a house you're only thought is, 'sonofabitch there is a god and I can move out of Jeffrey's trailer at long fuckin' last.'
According to the Home Savings dude, the bosses were racking up bonuses by telling their brokers to change the figures on the loans or to slam the few that did qualify for trad loans into subprimes because the firm could pull in $20K in fees not $5K in fees for the trad. If you were on the margins like most of the working poor and lowest middlings, you got slammed into subprimes on that basis alone. I can rattle off twenty-seven people that have erroneous credit reports because mortgage companies claimed to have had mortgages with those people when in fact those people never had loans with them or anyone else. No matter how hard they tried they couldn't get WaMu or whatever bank was listed to admit the borrower never had a loan with them. Contrary to popular middling kool-aid, credit reports do NOT EVER get fixed for lower class people. It's entirely up to the reporting creditor to make the change. Smell a rat in that? you bet.
Why was this done? Someone in the broker's office knew someone at WaMu/mortgage bank-du-jour who concocted it to make the borrower's FICO go down a hair lower so they "couldn't qualify" on paper for the trad.... even though a borrower's own credit union later told some of them, yeah, we'd have checked and taken your documentation as evidence (since WaMu/bank-du-jour had none, and didn't have to). But the Broker and her firm who stood to make at least $10K on the subprime really really wanted that borrower to have the subprime (and of course all on overpriced, highly overinflated condo prices... because houses were in the millions by then), all with the flippant justification, "well, they can just refi before the balloon payment hits anyway." (yeah, actual quote by many a broker in this mess).
Bottom line, the fraud and lying were on the part of brokers, mortgage banks and the Realty firms NOT the poor bastards (school teachers, artists, barristas, book store clerks, plumbers, studio property masters) who were swindled into thinking they and their young children could have a place to live other than a one bedroom apartment that looked like a third world leftover in the richest fucking country on earth.
I would love to hear more about the FBI loan fraud guys being taken off the case and if they were about to even find out about all that shit-level shoveling by those with all the power (banks, brokers and real estate agents).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The whole "liars loans" thing is a canard
Posted by: Beached Whale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Apr 6, 2009 1:27 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These capital markets provide liquidity to the entire system as well as fund consumer purchases of goods provided through the global supply chains whose manufacturing centers are increasingly in low wage areas like China. Thus, the new global capital markets are part of an institutional arrangement that is more appropriate to corporate globalization than the old middle class based national systems of production that relied on highly regulated domestic banking systems. Globalization, with its destruction of the middle classes of advanced capitalist countries, relies on global capital markets to fund consumption; progressive taxation and growing real middle class incomes are replaced by credit and the financialization of the global economy. The result is high levels of income and wealth concentration along with growing government deficits resulting from tax cuts for the rich, privatization of many public services, the end of the social safety net and union busting. Decreasing effective consumer demand increases demand slows growth. Low real wages increase demand for credit to sustain the economy and borrowing by consumers grows and produces high profits in the financial industry. The rich invest in various financial instruments and financial innovation responds to large institutional investors searching for outlets for surplus capital. Government deficits grow in order to subsidize tax cuts.
Placing the blame on the average American who "lives beyond his/her means" is wrong. This entire strategy was an institutional arrangement to facilitate corporate globalization in order to shift income and wealth from the middle and working classes to the corporate rich in a post-Fordist world high productivity and low real wages. Working families borrowed to fund consumption at high real rates of interest. Their loans were packaged together with other similar ones and sold as securities in global markets. This temporarily spread risk, sustained liquidity and gained quick profits for commercial lenders and financial investors. The contradiction was not just increased risk; it was the steady reliance on an increasingly impoverished middle class to continue payments on loans that underlay the securities sold in global financial markets. Stock and housing price bubbles burst and defaults occured. The entire system unraveled quickly and now a depression looms on the horizen.
The problem isn't corruption, the Fed or poor management although all these play a significant role. The real problem is the greed that led to a war on the incomes of the middle and working classes that led to financialization and the chronic stagnation which is now at the heart of the crisis. Borrowing replaced real earnings as a basis of consumption and growth. Only progressive taxation, financial regulation, public investment and a restoration of the social safety net can reverse the current crisis.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inspired1 on Apr 6, 2009 1:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, where are they now? Did they grow up, develop consciences and wither away...?
Need I answer this question?? The non-regulated market, Congress-for-sale, and globalization made all that stuff quaint, as well as unnecessary.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Apr 6, 2009 1:41 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people still feel that the financial gurus who got us here can get us out. Greenspan, Rubin, Summers, Geitner, Weill, Paulson, and Phil Gramm (just to name a few) all support policies of mass privatization and have merely shuffled these toxic assets around and forced the taxpayer to foot the bill.
But that is just a piece of the puzzle. The banksters have gained unbelievable power and control through their usury and established excessive interest rates that are built into our monetary policy.
The debt itself is the illusion. The question is not only why these fraudulent bankers are not prosecuted but why we choose to pay this debt at all. The interest does not go to the community, only a small fraction of it will be used for the benefit of the whole and our government is saying that it is American capitalism that they are protecting not the fortunes of the elite who control our military, access to a productive healthy food supply, our energy, and our currency.
Are we in the land of the free?
Whatever they do with the money Americans will be under the yoke of this for generations.
It is my belief that our banking system is a form of slavery and those in power will use all their available resources to not only keep it alive but further concentrate power through single world currencies and IMF banking practices.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inanaturallight on Apr 6, 2009 1:52 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://cyberjournal.org/authors/fresia/
It's thoroughly referenced and near as I can tell it's the most accurate of the historical accounts. NONE of what we see now is anything outside of the design handed down to us by the "fathers of the country". We're fascist by design.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peter g on Apr 6, 2009 1:53 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop buying crap you don't need, stop watching tv and stop believing anybody who says they can fix it.
Thats, when things will change, and only then.
peter g
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: usedtobesupermom on Apr 6, 2009 1:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ThomasG on Apr 6, 2009 1:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also think that BRIDGE BANKS chartered and funded with balance sheets free of toxic assets are a necessary requirement.
Markets made out of discounted capital assets of those who created the banking and economic collapse are also a necessary requirement.
Markets for discounted capital assets will create deflation.
Printing money to fund BRIDGE BANKS will create inflation.
If markets are made out of bankrupt capital assets and money is printed to fund BRIDGE BANKS, inflationary forces can be counterbalanced by deflationary forces that will allow our economy to become more competitive with Asia, and allow resources to reindustrialize our economy, so that we are no longer limited to being consumers in a mercantile economy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inspired1 on Apr 6, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shouldn't we be ready now to support a political party that basically agrees with William Black's assessments on these issues? One that needs no coaxing nor prompting to do something about it? No petitions and calls that get ignored?
Don't we need an actual party to accumulate and express the people's will on going after the Wall street gang and the so-called regulators? Why should we have to beg and cajole for what is right and decent and ... well, obvious.
Maybe it's time to stop trying to "inject" morals into compromised, corporate-funded parties that could care less, and START building from a moral high ground with a sustainable vision of democracy in the workplace, in the marketplace, at the doctor's office, and at home. Ya' gotta start somewhere, and it looks like Green Party to me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Apr 6, 2009 3:07 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
impression of Barak Obama was one of hope, change, hopefully a little independence of thought and deed. I was ready to extend time and patience for the transition of President. This is not working, as I concluded with the team of economic advisors, Summers, Giethner, Volker,
keeping,but shuffling, the same military advisors, Gates, Patraeous, etc......., maintaining the same aggressive stance in the middle east, giving the future of succeeding generations to thieves and con men, letting corporations have their way with our society. I have not seen any hope or change from this administration, just the same corporate controlled domination of the populace,
keeping control of the masses.
Now we are moving our military presence into Afghanistan, soon Pakistan, I was
hoping to see something other than an embracing of the status quo, but then I remembered that
our country elected a corporate candidate. I would hope that by this time the population would have awakened to the corporate shenanigans that have been so redundant throughout this
country's history, but then I thought about the collective attention span of America.
The time is ripe for us to stop the political complicit behavior, to adopt the Ralph Nader suggestion of a 1/10 of one percent tax on all stock transactions, to stop the sacrificing of this country's future to the perpetraitors of economic collapse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Apr 6, 2009 3:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is normal to take advantage where opportunity is given. Only the most saintly among us would not have done as the banksters and fraudsters did.
Now, a new president has been bamboozled by the mythical market and he's appointed the foxes to fix the chicken coop. Poor man! What's a poor guy to do? The banksters control the country and its politicians, and they got their man into the Treasury department and the Fed and as economic advisers--and they're all trying to keep a dead banking system propped up.
The big question out of all of this is: Do we need a banking system? Do we need any banks? Why not get rid of the lot of them, particularly the insolvent ones, jail the banksters, confiscate their ill-gotten gains, and stop throwing money down the drain. The Fed needs to be abolished, Geithner needs to be fired, Summers needs to be thrown out on his ear.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Garvagh on Apr 6, 2009 4:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US financial system made as little sense as Bush administration foreign policy in the Middle East and Central Asia, squandering trillions of dollars on unnecessary wars.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 6, 2009 6:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marid on Apr 6, 2009 7:24 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved the Credit Union idea and will pursue it quickly.
This link has a synopsis and interview but my buddy went through the hassle of scanning it for me. I am copying it and passing it around. Sorry Harper's the people need to know. Start the Revolution Now! Abolish Corporations Now!
www.democracynow.org/2009/3/24
First article in list.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great Harpers Article
Posted by: beijaflor
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: independent1 on Apr 6, 2009 11:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only ideology that will save us is the ideology of self-pride and self-respect which comes from growing up in these United States. We CANNOT ALLOW the super rich and their politician cat's paws to gut us as they are more than halfway to doing.
What I don't see here is any rallying cry: we must take personal responsibility for raising the cry against the outrage described by Professor Black. It's NOT Capitalism that's evil: it's the people using it in criminal ways and those WE elect who help them.
It's time for the TV and Internet journalists to start doing their job: bringing this news to the forefront and keeping it there. Where is True Majority and Common Cause? Why aren't they using their power to organize the public on this issue? There should be phone-in and email campaigns directed at every Congressional member and at the White House. There should be demonstrations in the streets!
Professor Black's remedy works: these corporations should all be put in receivership, the crooked managers should be indicted, fined, imprisoned.
I'm sick of all the infighting and snarky remarks and all the "shrugging shoulders" I see: is THAT all we've got? United, under the law and in the spirit of Americanism, we can revive and recapture this economy. If we let it slide any further, it will disappear down the Tunnel of No Return.
I won't live to see that: because I'll be in the forefront, demanding that the right thing be done - and that the "right thing" be maintained now and for as long as History will allow. We have never been a "Mañana" people and this situation must be addressed and fixed NOW. Start asking questions and demanding answers, demanding action!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: satwa.gunam on Apr 7, 2009 12:11 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Overspending by the common people taking advantage of the cheap credit available at the time of purchase, without thing of the cost of funds going up subsequently.
2. Fed blindly moving down the interest rates to increase consumption or increasing interest rate in fear of inflation. They had not thought of the balloning effect of interest rates on the already over leveraged common american.
This reminds me of a fable. Once a king wanted to display to his people their dishonesty. He built a big pond and asked all the people to pour one cup of milk.
All people thought other will pour milk and he can get away with pouring water. Next day morning the pond was with clean water.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: satwa.gunam
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: Beached Whale
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: satwa.gunam
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: satwa.gunam
» RE: Why blame bankers ? It is the People who did this mess
Posted by: uncleeddie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: common intelligence on Apr 7, 2009 4:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if Money is nothing more than digital computer entries, Why do people put These digital entries in a bank?,... to give them credibility?
Do we have no tools to keep our own digital entries in our own pocket instead of the banks being the only holders of these?
We have to think around the possessing of our collected personal moneys so that we are not made (all ready are) to accept the banks as the clearing house for our worth, therefore our worthiness as human beings.
Funny how Obama's going around the world asking people, "listening" to their concerns but doesn't listen to this country and disregards our input as unworthy of consideration.
I mean how many of you have been allowed to your constitutional right to address this country with a "redress of grievances"?
How many even know how to do it?
Congress , I have asked won't even answer any specific questions. They just reply in form letters to general whining. Like the gang letteres the "PEN" Ask you to send via a form emailing.
The only way we are going to get any recognition is to stop all of commerce collectively with a very specific demand to have the bastards sit down for as long as it takes and let us grill their asses until they start giving answers.
Let me tell you they are getting scared.
Really Scared.
And if we start raising some real ruckuses they are going to be forced to listen...not to our "representatives", but to us as individuals.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VaFonCulo on Apr 7, 2009 8:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This and rampant corruption at Fannie Mae ,coupled with ZERO regulation during the BUSH years are just as complicit in the creation and propagation of this shit storm.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What about the CDRA and Fannie Mae ?
Posted by: satwa.gunam
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wildbill on Apr 7, 2009 10:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mein kampf on Apr 8, 2009 2:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» whats up with the Hitler handle?
Posted by: drugs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uncleeddie on Apr 9, 2009 4:02 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Alex Jones is a fraud - sane, intelligent & RATIONAL people know this
Posted by: techcafe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ak47blog on Apr 9, 2009 7:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
website: http://www.greatcampcustommailbox.com/ak47popcorn2007blog/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: troy on Apr 9, 2009 6:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stupidity rules!
TRC
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joebanana on Apr 14, 2009 7:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
