COMMENTS: 14
Rare Protest Footage Reveals Tibetan Defiance of Chinese Crackdowns
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.
Tibet is under de facto martial law. The plateau has been virtually sealed off from the outside world, and Chinese troops and security forces are in the streets everywhere. All communication is strictly monitored, and in some places, mobile phone service has been shut down completely.
As Tibetans mark the 50th anniversary of the March 10, 1959, uprising that led to the escape of the Dalai Lama into exile, the Chinese government is doing everything in its power to intimidate Tibetans into silence and prevent the world from witnessing the extreme and brutal measures they have taken to enforce this silence.
Last week, YouTube found that its site had been blocked in China following the Tibetan government-in-exile's release of disturbing and graphic footage of the brutal treatment of Tibetans by Chinese forces during the March 2008 protests in Lhasa.
But despite the intense repression in Tibet at this time, Tibetans refuse to give up. In spite of the troops, tanks and snipers, in spite of the beatings, arrests and disappearances -- Tibetans continue to resist.
Tibetan monks, nuns and laypeople, young and old, continue to go into the streets to voice their opposition to Chinese rule. Sometimes it's one person, other times it's a handful. Just last week, in a remote town in eastern Tibet, it was more than a thousand.
The protest in Ragya started after a young monk, 28-year-old Tashi Sangpo, jumped into the Machu River (Yellow River). Sangpo had just escaped from police custody, where he was being held for reportedly raising the banned Tibetan flag atop the main prayer hall at Ragya monastery and distributing pro-independence leaflets on March 10.
We don't know if Sangpo was trying to escape from his captors or if he was trying to take his life. Witnesses saw him pulled under the water and swept away. And although Sangpo remains missing, Tibetans from Ragya say it is unlikely he survived.
The footage of the protest, though shaky and unclear, gives us a sense of the local people's reaction to Sangpo's desperate act. They gathered together, sounding the traditional rallying cry, raised their fists and shouted slogans like "bod gyalo" and "lha gyalo," -- "victory to Tibet" and "victory to the gods," -- and marched on the local police station.
Reports indicate that some in the crowd threw stones, and at least one official was badly beaten.
The last we heard, the area was flooded with troops, and Ragya monastery was surrounded by military. But we can't get any more information now because the phones are monitored, and people are fearful of retaliation by the authorities.
It's a serious crime to pass information to the outside world. Recently, 30-year-old Norzin Wangmo was sentenced to five years in prison for sending information out about the situation in Tibet by phone and Internet.
Officially, the Chinese state-run media is saying the Ragya protest was nothing more than a violent riot, where Tibetans attacked the police station. They say the Tibetans were "deceived by rumors" about Sangpo, who "went missing" after swimming across the Yellow River after escaping the police station.
So now it's our word against theirs. But at least this time we have some proof of what happened.
If you ask any Tibetan what would have compelled Sangpo to jump into a rushing river, what punishment could be so bad that this was the better option, they will likely sigh and shake their head in sadness.
Sangpo was in detention for suspicion of engaging in an act of protest, and every Tibetan knows what that means -- he would undoubtedly be tortured and imprisoned. That's just how it goes in Tibet these days.
But our people keep on fighting.
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dyolfknip on Apr 1, 2009 1:50 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel I must say that the situation in Tibet is much more complex than the western media wishes to portray it. Firstly, previous to China's occupation of Tibet it was a feudal theocracy; their people lived in deplorable conditions working mostly for the maintenance of the ruling religious institution. The western media never interviews the many people (non Dali Buddhists, atheists, etc) who are thankful for the improvement in the quality of life brought about by the Chinese government so the discussion is often one sided. Throughout the 1990's China raised the living standard of hundreds of millions of people above the worldwide poverty line and Tibet was a one of the primary recipients of their efforts.
The "brutal crackdowns" likely contain some truth (as most sensationalism often does) but are often the result of (excessive?) police actions against rioters who specifically target ethnic Han Chinese with violence. I question "excessive" not because I am trying to downplay brutal protest suppression but because we live in a world where the #1 police state feels it is justified occupying a country and murdering that countries people upon the flimsiest of pretexts. Most of those ethnic Han who have moved to Tibet did not go there in some malevolent effort to dilute the population as is often claimed but because they are Buddhist and they revere the Tibetan culture as many Chinese do... and it is not illegal to practise religion there. What is illegal is the veneration of the Tibetan "god-king" and the government in exile as the Chinese government views these as treasonous.
I don't for a second think that the Chinese government is faultless in their dealings with Tibet but I also don't think anybody should be subject to a feudal / slavery based system whereby the production of the workers (serfs) go to the betterment of the ruling theocratic government. Betterment which often takes the form of Temple beautification and other useless endeavours while the people lack many basic necessities. Once again I re-iterate: I am merely presenting another side of the argument which is often not heard or seen from a western perspective. Truly, I am ethicly opposed to any institution of oppression, but, I am also against "single acceptable opinion" paradigms.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: please consider this...
Posted by: sleepingdog
» Way off
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Way off
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Way off... indeed, you present one statement then argue for continued repression?!
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Way off... indeed, you present one statement then argue for continued repression?!
Posted by: cplot
» RE: please consider this... I consider it old shit dredged up as a new straw man
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sleepingdog on Apr 1, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 1, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She was willing to 'obliterate Iran'- but drop sto her knees for a country which not only slaughters religious sects, but oppresses the rest of the citizenship and sends poisonous products to US.Heckova Job there Hilly!
She even prefers to blame US for the Mexican Drug wars instead of equating the problem with the same one we see in Iraq & Afghanistan- those in 'law enforcement' who not only protect these criminal elements but Work for them!That's right Hillary blame the Pot smoking College student here and not the weapons manufacturers who has no Regulations to adhere to when distributing their cash of assault weapons around the world.
Anyone else seeing the pattern of Envoys being deployed to negate Hillary being the 'Diplomat' in those very tentative regions. 'Keep your Friends Close, but keep your enemies Closer'.
If Dick Cheney has 'moles' in the Pentagon, He also has one in the State Dept- her name is Hillary. Her '08 Campaign should have removed all doubt of which party she works for - the Corp Orgy called Cheney Corp.Hell her 'Third Times a Charm' Request eliciting the Fears associated with RFK's assasination was right out of the Neo Con handbook.
She and her legion of DLC'er are also rearing their ugly Red Coats through this new founded 'ConservaDem' movement. Led by no other than her right hand man Evan Bayh. These are not Democrats they are disaffected Repugs from the '80's- 1984 to be exact, Ohhhh so Appropo!
Really someone tell me ONE real policy difference between Hillary and McCain during the '08 campaign. Even NARAL saw through Hillary's 'Choice' stance and record.The Bitch ENDORSED McCain over and above her supposed Dem cohort!!!!
Thank God Obama Doesn't trust her either! Keep naming Envoys Mr. President and VP Biden keep a short leash on her, with a choker chain if necessary! Relegate her to appearances on such Fab shows as 'Awesome'.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Here's a person without a clue.
Posted by: Fog
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fog on Apr 1, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Geopolitics. No one ever talks about geopolitics.
Tibet represents a physical buffer from encroachment or invasion.
China will never "free Tibet" for national security reasons.
Read more about it Here.
Excerpt: "China is an island. We do not mean it is surrounded by water; we mean China is surrounded by territory that is difficult to traverse. Therefore, China is hard to invade; given its size and population, it is even harder to occupy. This also makes it hard for the Chinese to invade others; not utterly impossible, but quite difficult. Containing a fifth of the world’s population, China can wall itself off from the world, as it did prior to the United Kingdom’s forced entry in the 19th century and under Mao Zedong. All of this means China is a great power, but one that has to behave very differently than other great powers.
Strategically, China has two problems, both pivoting around the question of defending the coastal region.
First, China must prevent attacks from the sea.
The second threat to China comes from powers moving in through the underpopulated portion of the west, establishing bases and moving east, or coming out of the underpopulated regions around China and invading.
Note that running along the frontier directly south of (Tibet) is one of the largest population concentrations in the world. If China were to withdraw from Tibet, and there were no military hindrance to population movement, Beijing fears this population could migrate into Tibet. If there were such a migration, Tibet could turn into an extension of India and, over time, become a potential beachhead for Indian power. If that were to happen, India’s strategic frontier would directly abut Sichuan and Yunnan — the Chinese heartland. "
.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chlamor on Apr 1, 2009 2:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Dalai Lama's Tibet, torture and mutilation -- including eye gouging, the pulling out of tongues, hamstringing, and amputation of arms and legs -- were favored punishments inflicted upon thieves, runaway serfs, and other "criminals." Journeying through Tibet in the 1960s, Stuart and Roma Gelder interviewed a former serf, Tsereh Wang Tuei, who had stolen two sheep belonging to a monastery. For this he had both his eyes gouged out and his hand mutilated beyond use. He explains that he no longer is a Buddhist: "When a holy lama told them to blind me I thought there was no good in religion." (19) Some Western visitors to Old Tibet remarked on the number of amputees to be seen. Since it was against Buddhist teachings to take human life, some offenders were severely lashed and then "left to God" in the freezing night to die. "The parallels between Tibet and medieval Europe are striking," concludes Tom Grunfeld in his book on Tibet. (20)
Some monasteries had their own private prisons, reports Anna Louise Strong. In 1959, she visited an exhibition of torture equipment that had been used by the Tibetan overlords. There were handcuffs of all sizes, including small ones for children, and instruments for cutting off noses and ears, and breaking off hands. For gouging out eyes, there was a special stone cap with two holes in it that was pressed down over the head so that the eyes bulged out through the holes and could be more readily torn out. There were instruments for slicing off kneecaps and heels, or hamstringing legs. There were hot brands, whips, and special implements for disembowling. (21)
The exhibition presented photographs and testimonies of victims who had been blinded or crippled or suffered amputations for thievery. There was the shepherd whose master owed him a reimbursement in yuan and wheat but refused to pay. So he took one of the master's cows; for this he had his hands severed. Another herdsman, who opposed having his wife taken from him by his lord, had his hands broken off. There were pictures of Communist activists with noses and upper lips cut off, and a woman who was raped and then had her nose sliced away. (22)
Theocratic despotism had been the rule for generations. An English visitor to Tibet in 1895, Dr. A. L. Waddell, wrote that the Tibetan people were under the "intolerable tyranny of monks" and the devil superstitions they had fashioned to terrorize the people. In 1904 Perceval Landon described the Dalai Lama's rule as "an engine of oppression" and "a barrier to all human improvement." At about that time, another English traveler, Captain W.F.T. O'Connor, observed that "the great landowners and the priests . . . exercise each in their own dominion a despotic power from which there is no appeal," while the people are "oppressed by the most monstrous growth of monasticism and priest-craft the world has ever seen." Tibetan rulers, like those of Europe during the Middle Ages, "forged innumerable weapons of servitude, invented degrading legends and stimulated a spirit of superstition" among the common people. (23)
In 1937, another visitor, Spencer Chapman, wrote, "The Lamaist monk does not spend his time in ministering to the people or educating them, nor do laymen take part in or even attend the monastery services. The beggar beside the road is nothing to the monk. Knowledge is the jealously guarded prerogative of the monasteries and is used to increase their influence and wealth." (24)
LINK
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Have a Conscience on Apr 1, 2009 10:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regrettably for Tibetans in Tibet, Ms. Tethong is at the helm of whipping up descent. In a murderous style of work, he clique she leads exploits Tibetan Monks; all without the favor of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Funding from this clique wrongfully encourages Tibetans to stand up and protest in the most risky of fashions. It exploits these victims through the latest in technological innovations. By enabling, promoting and marketing their protest, Ms Tethong becomes a party to Tibetan's offences in China. When these innocent Tibetans are tortured and imprisoned, Ms. Tethong and her ilk surely have blood on their hands. For Ms. Tethong is not Tibetan; rather, she is a Canadian who relies upon her Canadian freedoms while bringing untold grief to others.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Obama's US Top Cop for Banks Wants Less Regulation, Echoes Republican Wall St. Pals
How the IRS Helps H&R Block Scam Taxpayers
SEC Drills a Peephole into Boardrooms




