ECONOMY  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 108

Powerful Banks and Government Handouts to the Rich: It's Time for Protest

A new grassroots group has organized protests for April 11 in 11 cities so far, and the ranks of signups are swelling fast.
March 25, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Economy headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Editor's Note:

Click here to join the protest!

The Rip Off Must Be Stopped!

Big bankers ruined our economy and now they are gaming the political system so they can profit even more off the crisis they caused. They must be stopped.

On April 11th, 2009, the public will come out in cities across the country to express their frustration and disapproval with how our elected officials have handled the economic crisis. No one has been left unscathed; this protest is yours.

Sign AlterNet's pledge that you aren't going to let this rip-off happen and join New Way Forward's national protest on April 11.

***

Somehow, we've created a system that protects some of America's wealthiest individuals by letting them build institutions that are "too big to fail." Large scale banking has left our economy unstable, and overly dependent upon too few institutions. Greed for short-term profit, and competitive exuberance, has led to incomprehensible financing schemes and rewards for companies that sold people things they couldn't afford.

But, increasingly, people are realizing that anger at the banks ought also be directed at Congress, and at ourselves. We have created corporations that have left us exposed, unstable, and made it easy for concentrated wealth to exploit the political process.

A new grassroots, bottom-up, organization, has sprung up demanding structural change, and grown from 4 to over 1,000 people in the last week. Their clear and important demand is this: any bank that is too big to fail is too big to exist.

A New Way Forward, a web-based, unfunded, brilliant new organization started by Tiffiney Cheng, Morgan Knudson, Andrew Packer, and Nicholas Reville after watching Simon Johnson talk about nationalization and reorganization on Bill Moyers. They realized that the public protests didn't fit what the public seems to actually want; people want structural change, but most of the outlets for anger had to do with bonuses and short-term fixes. NWF has a three part platform:

NATIONALIZE: Experts agree on the means -- Insolvent banks that are too big to fail must incur a temporary FDIC intervention - no more blank check taxpayer handouts. REORGANIZE: Current CEOs and board members must be removed and bonuses wiped out. The financial elite must share in the cost of what they have caused. DECENTRALIZE: Banks must be broken up and sold back to the private market with new antitrust rules in place-- new banks, managed by new people. Any bank that's "too big to fail" means that it's too big for a free market to function.

The first action is protests and events on April 11. Already, 12 cities are holding events, and eight more are planning them. Word of mouth and email is driving the growth.

NWF is taking this moment to channel our anger at the unfair, wasteful, and dangerously unstable mega-banks into constructive legislation to ensure that our democracy is never so exposed, by so few people, again. It's a great example of the power of the internet to enable collective responses to serious political problems. And it represents a serious intellectual challenge to a set of assumptions that have governed our economic thinking for the last several decades.

There are real advantages to economies of scale. But they only go so far; the disadvantages right now are glaring. We've learned about the instability inherent in concentrated power too well recently; any economy dependent upon so few institutions to provide any key, publicly necessary good is necessarily unstable. Moreover, concentrated wealth necessarily leads to concentrated political power.

A corporation has an obligation to maximize profits, and, if you are one of few big players, one of the best ways to maximize profits is to lobby, and fund media campaigns, and make political donations--to reward and punish.

Luckily, the legal structure needed to break up banks is already there. Call it "trustbusting 2.0." Congress can pass new antitrust laws that limit how large a corporation can ever grow. For now--for good reason--the concern with "too big to fail" corporations is focused on banks, but the logic applies to all corporate power. The modern, webby, trustbusters' intellectual grandparents include Teddy Roosevelt and Thomas Jefferson.

Congress can pass new antitrust laws that limit how large a corporation can ever grow and how much they can exploit access to politics to take public money. The more people that join NWF, the more likely that is to happen.

Click here to join the protest!


Zephyr Teachout was the Director of Internet Organizing for Howard Dean's campaign, the Executive Director of Baobabs College Labs Project, and a consultant to America Coming Together. She was previously the Executive Director of the Fair Trial Initiative.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Economy headlines via email


Comments are closed-

From Canada: WAY TO GO
Posted by: RR#1 on Mar 25, 2009 8:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't let them say that the deficit is now to large to institute reforms on energy, housing education and health-care.
The demands should be free and universal access to all of these social programs. Work for all people who want to work and a living wage. Let's get going. Our banks were not even in crisis and the government forked over 15 billion. Another banner year for the Banks North of the Border too!
Yours,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: From Canada: WAY TO GO Posted by: Robert G. Mac Donald.M.D.

Comments are closed-

Just to be clear and concise
Posted by: Rolomax on Mar 26, 2009 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Their clear and important demand is this: any bank that is too big to fail is too big to exist."

A bank that is 'too big to fail' shouldn't fail. It can't fail because it is so big. Right?

If it Still fails, then it is not too big to fail. Therefore, it should cease to exist, which, through the laws of competition, should enable smaller and/or newer and leaner more efficient banks to prosper from their demise. Right?

I have to wonder if we're looking at the correct angle in all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hey, Gang!
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Mar 26, 2009 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's have a letter writing campaign!


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Eff that! Posted by: -matti

Comments are closed-

Sure, I mean look at how successful 2-15-03 was!
Posted by: -matti on Mar 26, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I kid because I care.

Large street protests may have lost whatever effectiveness they once had in the U.S..

I can practically already hear Obama praising our great "American" rights and traditions of speech, and his understanding that people are "frustrated", and his compassion for the downtrodden, and his reminder that they are "doing what they can" and "working hard" to "fix" things, but that it will "take time",... can't you?

Oh well, have fun kids.

My town is way too little for a masive protest, but I promise to rant on the issue in the tavern that day, OK?

-matti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Anti-trust
Posted by: warrior woman on Mar 26, 2009 3:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand your point, however, anti-trust is another regulation that has been left unregulated for many, many years. To ensure our own financial (and personal) safety, we need to keep these corporations from getting too big.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Anti-trust Posted by: Rolomax
» RE: Anti-trust Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Anti-trust Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

It's About Time
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 26, 2009 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American people have awaken from their decades-long, right wing coma to find themselves dangling on the economic precipice. Did you have a nice little nappy time, kiddies?

What needs to happen now (aside from the mass protests and all that other neat stuff) is for Weeda Peeple to examine our sick, dysfunctional relationship with Ronald Reagan. So many of us (THEM) are still looking back at the dirty old bastard's administration with fondness and nostalgia.

HELLO???

People have got to made to understand that what is happening to their once-great nation is a direct result of their embrace of the stupid philosophy of a feeble-minded, failed "B" movie actor they so foolishly elected as president of the United States three decades ago.

The first step in overcoming a problem is admitting that you have one (I learned that in A.A.!) It's time that we come to terms with what Reagan did to us.

Stupid, Stupid Democrats

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

unfreeinus
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Mar 26, 2009 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't they know that money should go to support all of those social services, for the other group that feels they are entitled to. Come on now let's punish those crooks, take everything from them to reward me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The other group Posted by: nate

Comments are closed-

Why Saturday?
Posted by: underledge on Mar 26, 2009 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having a demonstration on Saturday is basically worthless! Why not midnight in the middle of the woods? Do it during the WEEK - Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or Friday!!!! Certainly wouldn't want to inconvenience the powers that be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Protesteth Mock Protests Posted by: americansheep
» RE: Why Saturday? Posted by: textdog
» Successful protesting requires Posted by: mgmyers79
» gimmie shelter Posted by: gimmie shelter
» RE: Why Saturday? Posted by: riondluz

Comments are closed-

Yes we Can
Posted by: outlook on Mar 26, 2009 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, get out there and fight the good fight - Obama needs the support of the American electorate. How else can he hope to implement the type of change which will be deeply unpopular amongst the vested interests of the Washington elite?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes we Can Posted by: mr.mister

Comments are closed-

The Right Thing to Do
Posted by: Urgelt on Mar 26, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any economist not employed by Wall Street, or otherwise linked to an extremist ideology, will instantly agree with everything this article says.

This, finally, is the right thing to do in response to the financial crisis.

Apart from Bill Moyers and maybe some of the New York Times commentary, it's a perspective not getting many column inches or much air time in mainstream media. And that is a terrible danger. Reverse socialism, using vast sums of taxpayer money to protect privileged interests, is surely a road to worse disasters than have already overtaken us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Right Thing to Do Posted by: Robert G. Mac Donald.M.D.

Comments are closed-

how about this for a no-cost non-violent protest against the misdirection of funds?
Posted by: Suzon on Mar 26, 2009 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's easy to get angry. (There seem to be endless reasons but most can be summed up as the misdirection of funds.)

It's harder to express the hurt that inspires the anger. But expressing hurt might be more effective than expressing anger. Shouting makes people turn away or shout back. Tears can remind us of our humanity.

So, clear plastic bottles can be picked up for free. Fill with tap water to symbolize human tears. Then use.

1. put a tag around the neck of the bottle with a short slogan ("banks have no heart") or a personal story ("made homeless in 2008").

2. carry it with you if you go on a march

3. raise it high in unison

4. get others and make a display in appropriate places (like the bunch of flowers thing only without the money-making of the flower industry and it's free speech, not littering). You don't have to travel to a big city.

5. keep doing it--it doesn't matter if it starts small; it will grow. Think in front of the Capital Building and the White House.

Even in poor countries the people can show their pain.

Politicians can and will reject anger with argument. They can't afford to react that way to pain.

You heard it first on Alternet, folks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» it's ridiculous Posted by: mgmyers79

Comments are closed-

Watch for interlopers..
Posted by: seazen on Mar 26, 2009 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there may be a sound target for the protest, it is clear from the blogosphere that the whole "tea party" notion is one that is attracting the nutjobs who simply want to bitch about Obama. There is no real rationale for these folks other than to find another excuse to rage and babble as instructed by their fearless radio talk-show heroes. Too many of these and the whole thing could be a waste.

We need to be "persistent" in the call for more accountability, more oversight, and more social pressure on the vultures that have been simply gaming the system with our money. It looks like Obama is ready to take the first steps. We need to be sure we are supporting his effort and not looking like the small, but vociferous, army of whiners out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We could switch from banks to credit unions and see how that all goes.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 26, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that's a peaceful protest worth carrying out and nobody but the crooked banks get hurt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shop them though Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

Here are the cities listed for protests...
Posted by: village1diot on Mar 26, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Phoenix
San Diego
Hartford
Washington DC
Chicago
Boston
Augusta, ME
Saint Louis
Raleigh, NC
Columbus, OH
Pittsburgh, PA
Charleston, SC
Austin, TX
Seattle

if your city is not listed, signup anyway as they might get more cities listed with enough response.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice try breaking through the Obama-Bots Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» No, it's Obamabots Posted by: Beck

Comments are closed-

Digg it up then...
Posted by: Beagle17 on Mar 26, 2009 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am surprised no one had clicked the Digg link. Digg is frustrating I know, but if you don't even make use of the networking tools that are available, then what do you think is to gain by protesting or cheering in a comment at AlterNet?

Here is the Digg link.

Please give it a click. Digg does help draw readers to a story. I've heard every registered Digg vote means ten pairs of eyeballs even if the story doesn't go popular.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Beagle's digg link is okay. Posted by: GuitarBill

Comments are closed-

Don't click on that link (IDENTITY THEFT!)
Posted by: GuitarBill on Mar 26, 2009 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This scumbag is not trying to protect your privacy; he's trying to steal your identity.

If you click on his "Privacy Center" hyperlink, the server the link points to will install a keylogger on your computer, which is used to steal your credit card number, SSN, etc.

Please, report the comment to Alternet's staff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Now you guys get a Clue- after 30 yrs of Trickle Down??
Posted by: Purple Girl on Mar 26, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now you want to protest? When we finally are on the brink of turning this Treachery around? yes I'm pissed about the Greed and corruption- but I've been for 30 yrs!! who didn't immediately recognize Trickle Down as the beloved economic stratedgy of Kings and Dictators? who missed the numerous examples of how politicans have been allowing this fleecing of the US coffers for decades- did you Miss the implications of the Keating 5, Enron?
Now your going to stage your Revolt against an admin that realizes our country was built from the bottom up? Now?
I will not join you - since you all never joined me over the last 30 yrs of Economic Treason. Where were you during the first Blood for Oil Campaign? Home, while some of US were protesting on street corners- cheering on your fearless leader HW? Where was your outrage when Gramm got Clinton to sign the end of the regulatory safeguards put in place after the last time Wall Streeters Fucked this country? Was your hair on fire over NAFTA and it's well foreseen ramifications?
this is like having a Boston Tea party AFTER we won the Revolutionary War!!
Did you just become Politically conscious (or develope a Conscience) Or have you finally gotten the Balls to speak up - now that you know you cna't be hauled off to some secret prison for voicing your dissent.Now you want to actively participate in our Democratic process? Frankly I find your timing about as advantageous as Robert the Bruce's who waited until After Willaim Wallace was tortured and executed to actually join the Fightfor Freedom. He got it, but much needless blood was spilt before he acted. this all could ahve been averted if you all would had picked up a history book or even a dictionary when 'Trickle Down' was re instituted 30 yrs ago! have a cigarette and a real cup of coffee- I hear it speeds up your synapses.Not only re you a 'day ' late- Our nations Now Trillions Short!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are the problem Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Yap, yap yap!! Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» are you mad? Posted by: mgmyers79

Comments are closed-

yeah....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 26, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah... I'm sure this will be MUCH more effective than all your other protests... because government has a habit of actually listening to such protests.

I remember when there were those record setting global protests over the Iraq war... oh, and all the other protests of it for more than half a decade afterwards and how effective they all were at stopping this war in its tracks.

As long as you are only begging government to please please please please be nice enough to listen to us or we'll ask again politely, you are not going to get very far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Without kindling... Posted by: Beagle17

Comments are closed-

We've been telling you for years: END THE FED!
Posted by: Fog on Mar 26, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you people can't see the truth that we've been heaping upon you by NOW, you're not paying attention!!

http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

... The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating. -Thomas Jefferson

History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance. -James Madison

http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us

If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations. -Andrew Jackson

The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. -Abraham Lincoln

Issue of currency should be lodged with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are opposed to...provisions [which] would place our currency and credit system in private hands. - Theodore Roosevelt

http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us



Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. -Woodrow Wilson

Years later, reflecting on the major banks' control in Washington, President Franklin Roosevelt paid this indirect praise to his distant predecessor President Andrew Jackson, who had "killed" the 2nd Bank of the US (an earlier type of the Federal Reserve System). After Jackson's administration the bankers' influence was gradually restored and increased, culminating in the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Roosevelt knew this history.

The real truth of the matter is,as you and I know, that a financial
element in the large centers has owned the government ever since
the days of Andrew Jackson... -Franklin D. Roosevelt
(in a letter to Colonel House, dated November 21, 1933)



http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us


.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Tea Parties are already ahead of the game
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Mar 26, 2009 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
come one, jump on the bandwagon you crazy moonbats. You know you want the same things as conservatives (safe streets, good schools, smart energy policy) and you want your hard earned money you put the risk into opening up that organic chocolate shop in tha ghetto by hieing former drug addicts and now your sweets are enjoyed world wide while providing a living for a community. Yes you did that and now the government is getting in your way, taking your cash and shoving it down some rabbit hole the powers that be (on Capital Hill, please take away the D, and R) enabling the skull (bleeping) from Wall Street. So come on down and Google Tea Party and take note.

The problem starts on Capital Hill

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Maxpayne brought up an interesting idea on credit unions. In fact, here's a factual article on CU.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Mar 26, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How Credit Unions Survived the Crash

By RALPH NADER

http://www.counterpunch.org/nader02232009.html

We really could teach these banks a tough lesson by hitting them where it hurts the most, their vaults. Credit unions are far more stable, don't do overhead costs, and are generally very community friendly. The banks are only going to stay powerful as long as they have their customers. The more customers banks lose to credit unions, the less government will be able to invent excuses or accept excuses for bailing out the crooked banks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Big Banks did make New York City, Charlotte, Delaware Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Um, explain please. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Have You visited Chalrotte? Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Urban Spraw will make Charlotte relivent anyways Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars

Comments are closed-

Federal Reserve Act 101
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 26, 2009 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 took control of credit and currency away from Congress and transferred it to private corporations the rise of corporate power and the demise of the government was ensured.

I have listened to many who say that the Federal Reserve Fractional Banking system is necessary in order to compete internationally, that a currency owned and operated by global corporations makes global commerce possible and that without it global commerce would dry up and America specifically would no longer be able to import goods from abroad once their currency was tied to their government because the government could just freeze payments to other governments during economic downturns. The problem with this logic is that there is no international regulatory body in place that protects both commercial interests and public interest for the benefit of all. It would be nice to have an international currency that is common to all governments, but that would then imply that there was an international republic in place that would ensure the welfare of all the members of that republic as well as the constituents of each. But that that just doesn't exist. We have these "Free Trade agreements in place without any regulatory body to ensure Fair Trade.

The real problem is that the United States once had in place sound labor laws and environmental protection laws that "Free Trade" agreements made moot. If business didn't like to pay livable wages to their employees, they only needed to move across the border to avoid that. If business didn't like the idea of responsibly disposing of their toxic waste, they only needed to move across the border and the environmental protection laws simply vanished along with the attendant expenses.

The real problem with Americans is that they like to have their cake and eat it too. They want cheap prices that out sourcing affords but they also want good wages and a clean environment that outsourcing destroys. In order for the United States to return to state of general affluence, the people need to return to return to a state of self sufficiency and that means being able to compete with the foreign labor market. But I can feel the shudders already, because that means to be able to compete with $1.00.day wages paid to laborers in Beijing and less than subsistence standards of living. But that is exactly what "Free Trade" has and is generating. In order for the United States to become profitable again, all people of the United States, notice I don't say Americans, because that would imply Canadians, Mexicans, Central Americans and South Americans, will have to learn to do with much less until they get their own manufacturing completive with the rest of the world. And if they want to maintain their standard of living then they will have to assess tariffs on countries that impose substandard living conditions on their people. You can't have slave labor countries making all your goods and providing you with all your services and ever hope that such a system will endure for any length of time. Revolt would only be a matter of time

I can't go on here any further, but in order for the United States to return to economic prosperity, the credit and currency of the United States has to once again vest with the Congress of the United States. When we have an international republic in place defining the rights and obligations of all people, then an international currency can be devised under the control of an International Congress that can hold corruption to a minimum. Until then everyone is only deceiving themselves.

The dollar can never become the defacto International currency because there is no Inrternational Body regulating it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Thanks, Obama
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 26, 2009 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When he said the other day we shouldn't demonize Wall Street, he lit a match. This molotov is going to the protests.

Go figure, an owning class President calls for the lowers to not hold the uppers accountable for the uppers' lethal and destructive criminal behavior. Brilliant.

No Justice no Peace... and if that fails, 17-fin'-89!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fascinating logic, Beck. Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Thanks, Obama Posted by: riondluz

Comments are closed-

In the Banks We Trust
Posted by: TC_ on Mar 26, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From The Vassals Handbook - Lesson fourteen – in the banks we trust:

I pledge allegiance to the banks of the Incorporated Estates of Earth and to the Rulers, whom they enrich, one Command throughout the land - obedience - with conformity and subservience for all.

Good vassals learn the Bank Pledge by heart when still wet from the womb. And with good reason. The Bank Pledge can take a vassal far in the Incorporated Estates of Earth. The banks are divine, and vassals mere mortals who owe their breath to the going rate of exchange. Few vassals would rather defy banks and starve than obey banks and have a chance. All is fair in love and banks.

Vassals may rent themselves freely, offering themselves upon the altar of the market at whatever rate the market and banks command. For those vassals with little or no market value: prisons. Thankfully. Not to mention urban concentration camps, reservations, and many a moonscape in the countryside. These all happily embrace the poor, once the banks have done with them.

Banks decree equitably one a vassal or a lord, depending upon your wealth. Which vassals and lords prosper enough to receive just conditions of life? The banks judge. Justice flows both to and from the banks and their best depositors. The most just depositors are the richest ones, of course, the least just the poorest. Vassals who can make no deposit at all might be thought of as the scourge of banking. Not so. The impoverished scarcely interfere with the balance sheet, thus the banks could not care less. What could be more reasonable and just than that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Alternet
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Mar 26, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the action page has a red "error message".

Perhaps it still works anyway, perhaps not. I would think that should be fixed.

Thx

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

They are ready for you
Posted by: Zimbly on Mar 26, 2009 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you think these "bankers" are stupid..they have that covered too.
When the protests get, lets say too real and too intense, there will be mass arrests all over the country.
There is already a huge Gulag system in place and the security apparatus in place just for this.
How did the phrase go ? "Americans exhibiting too much awareness will be considered a terrorist threat".
P.A.T.R.I.O.T Acts 1 and 2 , the removal of Habeus Corpus and Possetus Commatus, the enormous surveillance system and computer data banks.
In their words "bring it on"...we've got a surprise for you"..remember the GOP convention..that was just a dry run..were ready :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They are ready for you Posted by: riondluz

Comments are closed-

Create group on Facebook
Posted by: msteryis on Mar 26, 2009 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New Way Forward needs to create a group page on Facebook, if it hasn't already. What better way to get the info out and get people to sign up to participate?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protest, why now?
Posted by: jlowelld on Mar 26, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Protesting the banking situation is a good idea. But since the economy is always designed to rip-off the 'masses', why not have a general strike with the goal of rearranging this age-old pyramid scheme to one of equal distribution of wealth for all?

"As for the pyramids, there is nothing to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs." --H.D. Thoreau, 1854

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

TIME TO PUT COMPANIES BACK OUT TO PUBLIC SECTOR
Posted by: SassyFrassy on Mar 26, 2009 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DERIVATIVES are what are used in hedge funds the driving force at the helm of the financial meltdown.

People most of the companies in the bailout are a form of a Madoff scheme for certain.

ENRON USED DERIVATIVES as well but coupled them with DUMMY CORP.

what are DERIVATIVES---a type of risky gamble an insurance (whom cannot be called insurance otherwise they would have to be regulated by those in the insurance industry) so, they call them VEHICLES OR BETS which are sold to investment firms and they re-sell them. the bet says that when a company FAILS they will be paid back--then they sell these insurance type BETS to companies.
Only in these BETS there the risky companies. when these irresponsible USA investment firms buy them NEVER CHECKING/NEVER CARING WHETHER they are a good investment for them then the IRRESPONSIBLE COMPANY try to re-sell them. Only the GOOD INVESTMENT firms seeing they are no good---the GOOD INVESTMENT firms refuse to buy them. Then the IRRESPONSIBLE investment firm is forced to sell all their OTHER good stock investments until all the IRRESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT firms have left in their companies are a hug compile of BAD DERIVATIVES at which time the IRRESPONSIBLE COMPANY is bankrupt and WASH DC SLUGS KNOWING THIS decided to tie a noose around the public neck by the name of bailout which will cause a NEVER ENDING STREAM OF MONEY out of the USA to the creators of these bad debts (many of who hate USA).

Financial sector has a saying never put all your eggs in one basket.

Well, NATIONALIZATION is the equavalent of putting all one's eggs into one basket so when one fails the entire NATIONAL STRUCTURE unravels.

GET these companies back out into public sector, alone people. it's the way to go.

OTHERWISE we will wind up like CUBA only we will be owned by foreigners.

we will be FORCED into soc/glob/comm/fac/marx and 1 or 2 or several big companies will MONOPOLIZE AND DOMINATE the marketplace forcing USA to buy inferior goods at top gouge price.

GONE will be the hope of any American to start a small/med business because it will be impossible to do so. see familysecuritymatters.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Demigods
Posted by: willymack on Mar 26, 2009 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about how religious beliefs, no matter how bizarre or out of touch with REALITY they may be, are considered above any scrutiny or criticism. Or how the hucksters hawking the scam are considered to somehow be more than human because of their claim to a direct pipeline to the all-powerful, everlasting, never wrong, and always just Guy-in-the Sky. Anybody with that kind of juice has GOT to be above criticism, right? The same situation exists with the Titans of Industry, Finance, etc. The very fact of their obscene wealth is supposed to be a testament to their superior wisdom, vision, etc., when in fact nearly all of them are nothing but pathologically greedy, no-good bastards, who've come to where they are by the sweat of others and the exploitation of workers and cutthroat manipulation of politicans. The name may be different, but the poison's the same; just as preachers have insinuated themselves into a priviliged position in society, so have the robber barons. It's the same failure of many of us to recognize bad people when we see and hear them. THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOOD, either for themselves or humanity. If we ever learn this simple fact, and learn to ignore or avoid them we'll be a lot better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Economies of scale, some projects like a national energy grid
Posted by: RR#1 on Mar 26, 2009 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or national economic policy need large national and international institutions, but they should be non-profit public utilities not private entities set up to make a profit. This is a global economy and we are all interconnected and we should all share what we have and do so in a non-exploitive manner. I think the biggest problem we have is that people are wedded to the reforming the capitalist system and capital needs to constantly accumulate, expand and concentrate in order to work. We need public utilities not for profit institutions if things are going to change. Credit Unions are not in trouble and are doing quite well. I think we should take these things under consideration moving forward and not let our prejudice against public non-profit institutions blind us as we go forward. It is the profit imperative of capitalism that subverts and corrrupts all other condsiderations and why that system has to go. But this is a start.
Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hopefully
Posted by: wormfarmer on Mar 26, 2009 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this will get some attention. I became animated, (agitated?), and wrote my congressional representatives again, this is it: Stop the Obama / Geithner plan of throwing more money down a rathole. The succeeding generations future has already been spent, and is not showing any sign of slowing down. The congress is supposed to be responsible to the people, and it is money from taxation. How about recognizing where this money came from, and who is supposed to benefit from its use. I like the Ralph Nader suggestion of taxing derivatives transactions to recoup the bailout monies and have the financial
industries pay for their losses. Not the taxpayer. I am sending copies of this e-mail to Boxer and Feinstein. Please work together to find another path.


Sincerely,

Organize, protest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bring Signs: PULL THEIR CHARTERS
Posted by: Koondog on Mar 26, 2009 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only threat these crooks will listen to is one that is too gruesome for them to face: dissolving the corporation and its rights of a natural person. If their charters are pulled, the corporation dissolves and it is the equivalent of a death penalty. Greedy bastards hide behind corporate rights. Pull their charter and they're naked and helpless. Apparently courts do it to small, non-threatening corporations, so they need the political will to do it to the big boys. Yet, this option, a truly effective one, isn't even part of the conversation...yet. It should be since it is the only thing they will listen to. See www.polcad.com (org?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's www.poclad.org. My bad. Posted by: Koondog

Comments are closed-

A RETIRED AMERICAN CITIZEN
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 26, 2009 8:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SO WHERE'S MY COMMENT LOCATED AT ALTER NET?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protest?
Posted by: om7buss on Mar 26, 2009 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we can protest till we die, they don't care. we have to send people in goverment that have double citizenship, back to their country, many con-gress-man and seDators are jew-american; they have to make a decision is they serve US or israel?...www.henrybook.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ??? Posted by: gellero1

Comments are closed-

A THOUGHTFUL AMERICAN
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 27, 2009 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AGAIN= FROM A RETIRED AMERICAN= I SIGNED THE PETITION TO PROTEST AGAINST OUR GOVERNMENT SPENDING MORE MONEY. STOP AND THINK, WHY ARE WE TALKING BILLIONS AND TRILLIONS, WHY NOT TALK MILLIONS AND HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS, THIS BILLION GARBAGE WAS STARTED BY BUSH 2 MONTHS BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE. NOW YOUR PROTEST. I SIGNED UP, BUT I DONT PLAN ON TRAVELING 200 MILES TO STAND IN A UNHAPPY CROWD, THAT DOES'NT SEEM HEALTHY TO ME, BUT I DID SIGN THEIR PETITION YESTERDAY, BUT MY COMMENTS YESTERDAY WERE DELETED, BUT TODAY WITH PEOPLE THAT ARE'NT PREJUDISE, BUT ARE OPEN MINDED, YOU NOW SEE THAT BY COMMENTING IN THE MORNING OR DAYTIME IS BETTER. HAVE A NICE DAY, FROM MORE THAN ONE RETIRED AMERICAN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protests do work IF they are big enough
Posted by: nwcitizen on Mar 27, 2009 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree with some who have said that protests no longer work. This is true only because protests have not been big enough and have not lasted long enough. There are numerous examples of protests that have worked to change government policy in other countries. These have worked because enough people mobilized to get into the streets and STAY THERE until change happens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protests, Who?
Posted by: bobtr900 on Mar 28, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article calls for protests.

America is now such a fascist nation, I'm not sure protests will, any longer, do any good. Although Obama did say we will have to pressure him. Mayhap, nothing short of a real revolution will do the job. Are Americans, "we the people', really up to that? Somehow I just don't see that happening. The ownership class owns America. "We the people have become just too complacent with our 42" flat screen TVs and our overflowing bowls of buttery popcorn and risk aversive nature. Not to mention those 800 FEMA prisons and the battle hardened US Army combat Brigade and the mercenaries like Blackwater just waiting for us.

On the other hand, If we get pushed hard enough and far enough, who knows. Burn a WalMart here, a mega church there, who knows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Contact your business's..tell them enough
Posted by: wallisp on Mar 28, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its so sad that Geithner and others can't address the methods the banks are using, against the American public and small business's today, until 2012. Increasing interest rates, manipulating credit scores, unfair fees, short billing cycles, and now, fees for online payments. Small business's are under attack also. The American citizens and small business, should not be bailing out these toxic bank executives and their policies. I seems like an all out war against the consumer! Why aren't companies, rallying aginst these financial monsters? Why are companies, to protect their customers, who shop with them, not in the news, rallying against this financial terrrorism? Come on business's, business organizations, organize, protest, and protect your business. If the banks cripple enough people, who the hell is going to shop with you........no one. Cripple the credit card banks before they cripple your business any further. Tell the credit card companies, back off, or cancel their card services. Citizens in tent cities won't buy your products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obamistas..........
Posted by: gellero1 on Mar 28, 2009 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Change, change, hope, hope. Ra ra sis boom ba.

Why did you all buy into this??

Youth?? inexperience, adulation, lemmings??

Please, explain it to me

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

AN AMERICAN PROTESTING AGAINST MONEY WASTE
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 28, 2009 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I SUGGEST WE BUY THE FORECLOSED HOUSES FROM THESE 3 BAILED OUT COMPANIES, BUT INSTEAD OF BUYING WITH MORE MONEY, WE SUBTRACT FROM THE DEBT EACH OF THESE COMPANIES OWES FROM BAILING THEM OUT AND IF THE BAILOUT WAS'NT A LOAN, THEN THESE 3 COMPANIES CAN JUST TURN THESE FORECLOSED HOMES OVER TO OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF WHICH EITHER WAY SHOULD BE SOLD TO AMERICANS ONLY WITH NO DOWN PAYMENT OR LEASED ONLY TO AMERICANS AND ALL THE MONEY GOING TO OUR FEDERAL RESERVE. AS FAR AS THE CD'S ARE CONCERNED, THE PRIVATE INVESTORS CAN BUY THEM. THIS WAY OUR GOVERNMENT WONT NEED TO WASTE A TRILLION DOLLARS ON THESE HOMES. HAVE A NICE DAY. MIKE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

One Party With 2 Right Wings To Rule Them All
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 29, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore once said that America had only one major political party- the Money Party and it had two right wings. I'm pretty sure he was, and is, right.

There was and is no such thing as a kinder and gentler America or a compassionate conservative or a reformed Rethugnican Party. Despite a generation of promising that it wasn't the robber baron party of the Gilded Age it has managed to walk down the exact same path of corruption and opposition to even the simplest of rights and protections for citizens and workers.

Despite the cries of Evangelicals the God of America is money. By the words of Jesus of Nazareth, one cannot serve two masters. That famous proclamation said that you would cling to one and despise the other. I think that is where we are today.

The pols have sold out to the monied interests and despise those who would interfere with making money by the selling of votes and later influence and access as lobbyists. How many potential former members of Congress failed Obama's vetting because of financial ties to those they have previously regulated or shared oversight over. Remember, these are supposed to be Democrats- people.

Then there are the southern DINO's- the modern traitors to the progressive cause just like the generations of DINOs from the south that held our country back on civil rights, unions, consumer protection and all the rest. The south's tradition is that of an oligarchy- not a democracy and it still has these tendencies. It's still poisoning America.

The progressives either have to purge the party of Republicans in drag (DINOS, Blue-Ticks, DLC, whatever) or leave and start a new progressive party. The southern DINOS have shown that they are willing to urinate and defecate in the public punchbowl to protect the status quo and the vested interests that have bought and paid for them. Yes, Senators Lincoln and Pryor, I am calling you out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Addendum Posted by: NoPCZone

Comments are closed-

Support this Solution
Posted by: TerryS on Mar 29, 2009 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's articles and organizing like this
that makes me happy to support Alternet.

And I'll certainly be at the protest.

Obviously, one little national protest
won't solve the problem, but it is
an excellent first step.

Temporarily nationalizing the failed banks,
breaking up the banks that are "too big to
fail", and increasing oversight are
exactly the solutions that need to be
done as soon as possible.

So far Obama has been in thrall of the
"financial experts" from Wall Street who got
us into this mess. But the great thing about
Obama is that he does listen to his supporters.
This protest, and many other more forms of
communication, will send the message to
Obama that this is the way to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ONE WAY TO END THE FED AND A LOT OF OTHER SHENANIGANS...
Posted by: HeatherC on Mar 30, 2009 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A federal tax revolt. Everybody pay your federal taxes to your home state. Corporate, personal income, federal excise, the whole nine yards. If it's a federal tax and it's collected locally, pay it to your home state. The IRS won't be able to do anything about it except make threats they know they can't carry out. There will be no money to prosecute or incarcerate us.

We can bring the federal government down on its knees by doing the one thing they think we don't have the guts to do. Lose your fear of government and do the one thing that will not only put everyone in Washington on notice, but will restore the respect that we once had. Democracy does not run on auto-pilot. It'll take more than protests, petitions and letters to your congressman to drive the message home.

Everybody-rich, poor, liberal, conservative, carnivore, vegan, boxers, briefs-pay your federal taxes to your home state. Put a little stimulus in your state and local economies for once, and the only recession will be the one in Washington. Shall we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ACTION!
Posted by: om7buss on Mar 31, 2009 12:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we have to move our checking accounts to small local banks, credit unions, etc...www.henrybook.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

From Canada: WAY TO GO
Posted by: RR#1 on Mar 25, 2009 8:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't let them say that the deficit is now to large to institute reforms on energy, housing education and health-care.
The demands should be free and universal access to all of these social programs. Work for all people who want to work and a living wage. Let's get going. Our banks were not even in crisis and the government forked over 15 billion. Another banner year for the Banks North of the Border too!
Yours,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: From Canada: WAY TO GO Posted by: Robert G. Mac Donald.M.D.

Comments are closed-

Just to be clear and concise
Posted by: Rolomax on Mar 26, 2009 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Their clear and important demand is this: any bank that is too big to fail is too big to exist."

A bank that is 'too big to fail' shouldn't fail. It can't fail because it is so big. Right?

If it Still fails, then it is not too big to fail. Therefore, it should cease to exist, which, through the laws of competition, should enable smaller and/or newer and leaner more efficient banks to prosper from their demise. Right?

I have to wonder if we're looking at the correct angle in all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hey, Gang!
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Mar 26, 2009 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's have a letter writing campaign!


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Eff that! Posted by: -matti

Comments are closed-

Sure, I mean look at how successful 2-15-03 was!
Posted by: -matti on Mar 26, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I kid because I care.

Large street protests may have lost whatever effectiveness they once had in the U.S..

I can practically already hear Obama praising our great "American" rights and traditions of speech, and his understanding that people are "frustrated", and his compassion for the downtrodden, and his reminder that they are "doing what they can" and "working hard" to "fix" things, but that it will "take time",... can't you?

Oh well, have fun kids.

My town is way too little for a masive protest, but I promise to rant on the issue in the tavern that day, OK?

-matti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Anti-trust
Posted by: warrior woman on Mar 26, 2009 3:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand your point, however, anti-trust is another regulation that has been left unregulated for many, many years. To ensure our own financial (and personal) safety, we need to keep these corporations from getting too big.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Anti-trust Posted by: Rolomax
» RE: Anti-trust Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Anti-trust Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

It's About Time
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 26, 2009 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American people have awaken from their decades-long, right wing coma to find themselves dangling on the economic precipice. Did you have a nice little nappy time, kiddies?

What needs to happen now (aside from the mass protests and all that other neat stuff) is for Weeda Peeple to examine our sick, dysfunctional relationship with Ronald Reagan. So many of us (THEM) are still looking back at the dirty old bastard's administration with fondness and nostalgia.

HELLO???

People have got to made to understand that what is happening to their once-great nation is a direct result of their embrace of the stupid philosophy of a feeble-minded, failed "B" movie actor they so foolishly elected as president of the United States three decades ago.

The first step in overcoming a problem is admitting that you have one (I learned that in A.A.!) It's time that we come to terms with what Reagan did to us.

Stupid, Stupid Democrats

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

unfreeinus
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Mar 26, 2009 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't they know that money should go to support all of those social services, for the other group that feels they are entitled to. Come on now let's punish those crooks, take everything from them to reward me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The other group Posted by: nate

Comments are closed-

Why Saturday?
Posted by: underledge on Mar 26, 2009 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having a demonstration on Saturday is basically worthless! Why not midnight in the middle of the woods? Do it during the WEEK - Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or Friday!!!! Certainly wouldn't want to inconvenience the powers that be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Protesteth Mock Protests Posted by: americansheep
» RE: Why Saturday? Posted by: textdog
» Successful protesting requires Posted by: mgmyers79
» gimmie shelter Posted by: gimmie shelter
» RE: Why Saturday? Posted by: riondluz

Comments are closed-

Yes we Can
Posted by: outlook on Mar 26, 2009 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, get out there and fight the good fight - Obama needs the support of the American electorate. How else can he hope to implement the type of change which will be deeply unpopular amongst the vested interests of the Washington elite?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes we Can Posted by: mr.mister

Comments are closed-

The Right Thing to Do
Posted by: Urgelt on Mar 26, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any economist not employed by Wall Street, or otherwise linked to an extremist ideology, will instantly agree with everything this article says.

This, finally, is the right thing to do in response to the financial crisis.

Apart from Bill Moyers and maybe some of the New York Times commentary, it's a perspective not getting many column inches or much air time in mainstream media. And that is a terrible danger. Reverse socialism, using vast sums of taxpayer money to protect privileged interests, is surely a road to worse disasters than have already overtaken us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Right Thing to Do Posted by: Robert G. Mac Donald.M.D.

Comments are closed-

how about this for a no-cost non-violent protest against the misdirection of funds?
Posted by: Suzon on Mar 26, 2009 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's easy to get angry. (There seem to be endless reasons but most can be summed up as the misdirection of funds.)

It's harder to express the hurt that inspires the anger. But expressing hurt might be more effective than expressing anger. Shouting makes people turn away or shout back. Tears can remind us of our humanity.

So, clear plastic bottles can be picked up for free. Fill with tap water to symbolize human tears. Then use.

1. put a tag around the neck of the bottle with a short slogan ("banks have no heart") or a personal story ("made homeless in 2008").

2. carry it with you if you go on a march

3. raise it high in unison

4. get others and make a display in appropriate places (like the bunch of flowers thing only without the money-making of the flower industry and it's free speech, not littering). You don't have to travel to a big city.

5. keep doing it--it doesn't matter if it starts small; it will grow. Think in front of the Capital Building and the White House.

Even in poor countries the people can show their pain.

Politicians can and will reject anger with argument. They can't afford to react that way to pain.

You heard it first on Alternet, folks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» it's ridiculous Posted by: mgmyers79

Comments are closed-

Watch for interlopers..
Posted by: seazen on Mar 26, 2009 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there may be a sound target for the protest, it is clear from the blogosphere that the whole "tea party" notion is one that is attracting the nutjobs who simply want to bitch about Obama. There is no real rationale for these folks other than to find another excuse to rage and babble as instructed by their fearless radio talk-show heroes. Too many of these and the whole thing could be a waste.

We need to be "persistent" in the call for more accountability, more oversight, and more social pressure on the vultures that have been simply gaming the system with our money. It looks like Obama is ready to take the first steps. We need to be sure we are supporting his effort and not looking like the small, but vociferous, army of whiners out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We could switch from banks to credit unions and see how that all goes.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 26, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that's a peaceful protest worth carrying out and nobody but the crooked banks get hurt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shop them though Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

Here are the cities listed for protests...
Posted by: village1diot on Mar 26, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Phoenix
San Diego
Hartford
Washington DC
Chicago
Boston
Augusta, ME
Saint Louis
Raleigh, NC
Columbus, OH
Pittsburgh, PA
Charleston, SC
Austin, TX
Seattle

if your city is not listed, signup anyway as they might get more cities listed with enough response.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice try breaking through the Obama-Bots Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» No, it's Obamabots Posted by: Beck

Comments are closed-

Digg it up then...
Posted by: Beagle17 on Mar 26, 2009 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am surprised no one had clicked the Digg link. Digg is frustrating I know, but if you don't even make use of the networking tools that are available, then what do you think is to gain by protesting or cheering in a comment at AlterNet?

Here is the Digg link.

Please give it a click. Digg does help draw readers to a story. I've heard every registered Digg vote means ten pairs of eyeballs even if the story doesn't go popular.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Beagle's digg link is okay. Posted by: GuitarBill

Comments are closed-

Don't click on that link (IDENTITY THEFT!)
Posted by: GuitarBill on Mar 26, 2009 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This scumbag is not trying to protect your privacy; he's trying to steal your identity.

If you click on his "Privacy Center" hyperlink, the server the link points to will install a keylogger on your computer, which is used to steal your credit card number, SSN, etc.

Please, report the comment to Alternet's staff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Now you guys get a Clue- after 30 yrs of Trickle Down??
Posted by: Purple Girl on Mar 26, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now you want to protest? When we finally are on the brink of turning this Treachery around? yes I'm pissed about the Greed and corruption- but I've been for 30 yrs!! who didn't immediately recognize Trickle Down as the beloved economic stratedgy of Kings and Dictators? who missed the numerous examples of how politicans have been allowing this fleecing of the US coffers for decades- did you Miss the implications of the Keating 5, Enron?
Now your going to stage your Revolt against an admin that realizes our country was built from the bottom up? Now?
I will not join you - since you all never joined me over the last 30 yrs of Economic Treason. Where were you during the first Blood for Oil Campaign? Home, while some of US were protesting on street corners- cheering on your fearless leader HW? Where was your outrage when Gramm got Clinton to sign the end of the regulatory safeguards put in place after the last time Wall Streeters Fucked this country? Was your hair on fire over NAFTA and it's well foreseen ramifications?
this is like having a Boston Tea party AFTER we won the Revolutionary War!!
Did you just become Politically conscious (or develope a Conscience) Or have you finally gotten the Balls to speak up - now that you know you cna't be hauled off to some secret prison for voicing your dissent.Now you want to actively participate in our Democratic process? Frankly I find your timing about as advantageous as Robert the Bruce's who waited until After Willaim Wallace was tortured and executed to actually join the Fightfor Freedom. He got it, but much needless blood was spilt before he acted. this all could ahve been averted if you all would had picked up a history book or even a dictionary when 'Trickle Down' was re instituted 30 yrs ago! have a cigarette and a real cup of coffee- I hear it speeds up your synapses.Not only re you a 'day ' late- Our nations Now Trillions Short!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are the problem Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Yap, yap yap!! Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» are you mad? Posted by: mgmyers79

Comments are closed-

yeah....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 26, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah... I'm sure this will be MUCH more effective than all your other protests... because government has a habit of actually listening to such protests.

I remember when there were those record setting global protests over the Iraq war... oh, and all the other protests of it for more than half a decade afterwards and how effective they all were at stopping this war in its tracks.

As long as you are only begging government to please please please please be nice enough to listen to us or we'll ask again politely, you are not going to get very far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Without kindling... Posted by: Beagle17

Comments are closed-

We've been telling you for years: END THE FED!
Posted by: Fog on Mar 26, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you people can't see the truth that we've been heaping upon you by NOW, you're not paying attention!!

http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

... The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating. -Thomas Jefferson

History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance. -James Madison

http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us

If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations. -Andrew Jackson

The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. -Abraham Lincoln

Issue of currency should be lodged with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are opposed to...provisions [which] would place our currency and credit system in private hands. - Theodore Roosevelt

http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us



Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. -Woodrow Wilson

Years later, reflecting on the major banks' control in Washington, President Franklin Roosevelt paid this indirect praise to his distant predecessor President Andrew Jackson, who had "killed" the 2nd Bank of the US (an earlier type of the Federal Reserve System). After Jackson's administration the bankers' influence was gradually restored and increased, culminating in the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Roosevelt knew this history.

The real truth of the matter is,as you and I know, that a financial
element in the large centers has owned the government ever since
the days of Andrew Jackson... -Franklin D. Roosevelt
(in a letter to Colonel House, dated November 21, 1933)



http://www.themoneymasters.com/quotations.htm

http://endthefed.us


.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The Tea Parties are already ahead of the game
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Mar 26, 2009 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
come one, jump on the bandwagon you crazy moonbats. You know you want the same things as conservatives (safe streets, good schools, smart energy policy) and you want your hard earned money you put the risk into opening up that organic chocolate shop in tha ghetto by hieing former drug addicts and now your sweets are enjoyed world wide while providing a living for a community. Yes you did that and now the government is getting in your way, taking your cash and shoving it down some rabbit hole the powers that be (on Capital Hill, please take away the D, and R) enabling the skull (bleeping) from Wall Street. So come on down and Google Tea Party and take note.

The problem starts on Capital Hill

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Maxpayne brought up an interesting idea on credit unions. In fact, here's a factual article on CU.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Mar 26, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How Credit Unions Survived the Crash

By RALPH NADER

http://www.counterpunch.org/nader02232009.html

We really could teach these banks a tough lesson by hitting them where it hurts the most, their vaults. Credit unions are far more stable, don't do overhead costs, and are generally very community friendly. The banks are only going to stay powerful as long as they have their customers. The more customers banks lose to credit unions, the less government will be able to invent excuses or accept excuses for bailing out the crooked banks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Big Banks did make New York City, Charlotte, Delaware Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Um, explain please. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Have You visited Chalrotte? Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» Urban Spraw will make Charlotte relivent anyways Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars

Comments are closed-

Federal Reserve Act 101
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 26, 2009 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 took control of credit and currency away from Congress and transferred it to private corporations the rise of corporate power and the demise of the government was ensured.

I have listened to many who say that the Federal Reserve Fractional Banking system is necessary in order to compete internationally, that a currency owned and operated by global corporations makes global commerce possible and that without it global commerce would dry up and America specifically would no longer be able to import goods from abroad once their currency was tied to their government because the government could just freeze payments to other governments during economic downturns. The problem with this logic is that there is no international regulatory body in place that protects both commercial interests and public interest for the benefit of all. It would be nice to have an international currency that is common to all governments, but that would then imply that there was an international republic in place that would ensure the welfare of all the members of that republic as well as the constituents of each. But that that just doesn't exist. We have these "Free Trade agreements in place without any regulatory body to ensure Fair Trade.

The real problem is that the United States once had in place sound labor laws and environmental protection laws that "Free Trade" agreements made moot. If business didn't like to pay livable wages to their employees, they only needed to move across the border to avoid that. If business didn't like the idea of responsibly disposing of their toxic waste, they only needed to move across the border and the environmental protection laws simply vanished along with the attendant expenses.

The real problem with Americans is that they like to have their cake and eat it too. They want cheap prices that out sourcing affords but they also want good wages and a clean environment that outsourcing destroys. In order for the United States to return to state of general affluence, the people need to return to return to a state of self sufficiency and that means being able to compete with the foreign labor market. But I can feel the shudders already, because that means to be able to compete with $1.00.day wages paid to laborers in Beijing and less than subsistence standards of living. But that is exactly what "Free Trade" has and is generating. In order for the United States to become profitable again, all people of the United States, notice I don't say Americans, because that would imply Canadians, Mexicans, Central Americans and South Americans, will have to learn to do with much less until they get their own manufacturing completive with the rest of the world. And if they want to maintain their standard of living then they will have to assess tariffs on countries that impose substandard living conditions on their people. You can't have slave labor countries making all your goods and providing you with all your services and ever hope that such a system will endure for any length of time. Revolt would only be a matter of time

I can't go on here any further, but in order for the United States to return to economic prosperity, the credit and currency of the United States has to once again vest with the Congress of the United States. When we have an international republic in place defining the rights and obligations of all people, then an international currency can be devised under the control of an International Congress that can hold corruption to a minimum. Until then everyone is only deceiving themselves.

The dollar can never become the defacto International currency because there is no Inrternational Body regulating it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Thanks, Obama
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 26, 2009 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When he said the other day we shouldn't demonize Wall Street, he lit a match. This molotov is going to the protests.

Go figure, an owning class President calls for the lowers to not hold the uppers accountable for the uppers' lethal and destructive criminal behavior. Brilliant.

No Justice no Peace... and if that fails, 17-fin'-89!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fascinating logic, Beck. Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Thanks, Obama Posted by: riondluz

Comments are closed-

In the Banks We Trust
Posted by: TC_ on Mar 26, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From The Vassals Handbook - Lesson fourteen – in the banks we trust:

I pledge allegiance to the banks of the Incorporated Estates of Earth and to the Rulers, whom they enrich, one Command throughout the land - obedience - with conformity and subservience for all.

Good vassals learn the Bank Pledge by heart when still wet from the womb. And with good reason. The Bank Pledge can take a vassal far in the Incorporated Estates of Earth. The banks are divine, and vassals mere mortals who owe their breath to the going rate of exchange. Few vassals would rather defy banks and starve than obey banks and have a chance. All is fair in love and banks.

Vassals may rent themselves freely, offering themselves upon the altar of the market at whatever rate the market and banks command. For those vassals with little or no market value: prisons. Thankfully. Not to mention urban concentration camps, reservations, and many a moonscape in the countryside. These all happily embrace the poor, once the banks have done with them.

Banks decree equitably one a vassal or a lord, depending upon your wealth. Which vassals and lords prosper enough to receive just conditions of life? The banks judge. Justice flows both to and from the banks and their best depositors. The most just depositors are the richest ones, of course, the least just the poorest. Vassals who can make no deposit at all might be thought of as the scourge of banking. Not so. The impoverished scarcely interfere with the balance sheet, thus the banks could not care less. What could be more reasonable and just than that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Alternet
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Mar 26, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the action page has a red "error message".

Perhaps it still works anyway, perhaps not. I would think that should be fixed.

Thx

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

They are ready for you
Posted by: Zimbly on Mar 26, 2009 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you think these "bankers" are stupid..they have that covered too.
When the protests get, lets say too real and too intense, there will be mass arrests all over the country.
There is already a huge Gulag system in place and the security apparatus in place just for this.
How did the phrase go ? "Americans exhibiting too much awareness will be considered a terrorist threat".
P.A.T.R.I.O.T Acts 1 and 2 , the removal of Habeus Corpus and Possetus Commatus, the enormous surveillance system and computer data banks.
In their words "bring it on"...we've got a surprise for you"..remember the GOP convention..that was just a dry run..were ready :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They are ready for you Posted by: riondluz

Comments are closed-

Create group on Facebook
Posted by: msteryis on Mar 26, 2009 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New Way Forward needs to create a group page on Facebook, if it hasn't already. What better way to get the info out and get people to sign up to participate?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protest, why now?
Posted by: jlowelld on Mar 26, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Protesting the banking situation is a good idea. But since the economy is always designed to rip-off the 'masses', why not have a general strike with the goal of rearranging this age-old pyramid scheme to one of equal distribution of wealth for all?

"As for the pyramids, there is nothing to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs." --H.D. Thoreau, 1854

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

TIME TO PUT COMPANIES BACK OUT TO PUBLIC SECTOR
Posted by: SassyFrassy on Mar 26, 2009 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DERIVATIVES are what are used in hedge funds the driving force at the helm of the financial meltdown.

People most of the companies in the bailout are a form of a Madoff scheme for certain.

ENRON USED DERIVATIVES as well but coupled them with DUMMY CORP.

what are DERIVATIVES---a type of risky gamble an insurance (whom cannot be called insurance otherwise they would have to be regulated by those in the insurance industry) so, they call them VEHICLES OR BETS which are sold to investment firms and they re-sell them. the bet says that when a company FAILS they will be paid back--then they sell these insurance type BETS to companies.
Only in these BETS there the risky companies. when these irresponsible USA investment firms buy them NEVER CHECKING/NEVER CARING WHETHER they are a good investment for them then the IRRESPONSIBLE COMPANY try to re-sell them. Only the GOOD INVESTMENT firms seeing they are no good---the GOOD INVESTMENT firms refuse to buy them. Then the IRRESPONSIBLE investment firm is forced to sell all their OTHER good stock investments until all the IRRESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT firms have left in their companies are a hug compile of BAD DERIVATIVES at which time the IRRESPONSIBLE COMPANY is bankrupt and WASH DC SLUGS KNOWING THIS decided to tie a noose around the public neck by the name of bailout which will cause a NEVER ENDING STREAM OF MONEY out of the USA to the creators of these bad debts (many of who hate USA).

Financial sector has a saying never put all your eggs in one basket.

Well, NATIONALIZATION is the equavalent of putting all one's eggs into one basket so when one fails the entire NATIONAL STRUCTURE unravels.

GET these companies back out into public sector, alone people. it's the way to go.

OTHERWISE we will wind up like CUBA only we will be owned by foreigners.

we will be FORCED into soc/glob/comm/fac/marx and 1 or 2 or several big companies will MONOPOLIZE AND DOMINATE the marketplace forcing USA to buy inferior goods at top gouge price.

GONE will be the hope of any American to start a small/med business because it will be impossible to do so. see familysecuritymatters.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Demigods
Posted by: willymack on Mar 26, 2009 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about how religious beliefs, no matter how bizarre or out of touch with REALITY they may be, are considered above any scrutiny or criticism. Or how the hucksters hawking the scam are considered to somehow be more than human because of their claim to a direct pipeline to the all-powerful, everlasting, never wrong, and always just Guy-in-the Sky. Anybody with that kind of juice has GOT to be above criticism, right? The same situation exists with the Titans of Industry, Finance, etc. The very fact of their obscene wealth is supposed to be a testament to their superior wisdom, vision, etc., when in fact nearly all of them are nothing but pathologically greedy, no-good bastards, who've come to where they are by the sweat of others and the exploitation of workers and cutthroat manipulation of politicans. The name may be different, but the poison's the same; just as preachers have insinuated themselves into a priviliged position in society, so have the robber barons. It's the same failure of many of us to recognize bad people when we see and hear them. THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOOD, either for themselves or humanity. If we ever learn this simple fact, and learn to ignore or avoid them we'll be a lot better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Economies of scale, some projects like a national energy grid
Posted by: RR#1 on Mar 26, 2009 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or national economic policy need large national and international institutions, but they should be non-profit public utilities not private entities set up to make a profit. This is a global economy and we are all interconnected and we should all share what we have and do so in a non-exploitive manner. I think the biggest problem we have is that people are wedded to the reforming the capitalist system and capital needs to constantly accumulate, expand and concentrate in order to work. We need public utilities not for profit institutions if things are going to change. Credit Unions are not in trouble and are doing quite well. I think we should take these things under consideration moving forward and not let our prejudice against public non-profit institutions blind us as we go forward. It is the profit imperative of capitalism that subverts and corrrupts all other condsiderations and why that system has to go. But this is a start.
Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hopefully
Posted by: wormfarmer on Mar 26, 2009 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this will get some attention. I became animated, (agitated?), and wrote my congressional representatives again, this is it: Stop the Obama / Geithner plan of throwing more money down a rathole. The succeeding generations future has already been spent, and is not showing any sign of slowing down. The congress is supposed to be responsible to the people, and it is money from taxation. How about recognizing where this money came from, and who is supposed to benefit from its use. I like the Ralph Nader suggestion of taxing derivatives transactions to recoup the bailout monies and have the financial
industries pay for their losses. Not the taxpayer. I am sending copies of this e-mail to Boxer and Feinstein. Please work together to find another path.


Sincerely,

Organize, protest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bring Signs: PULL THEIR CHARTERS
Posted by: Koondog on Mar 26, 2009 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only threat these crooks will listen to is one that is too gruesome for them to face: dissolving the corporation and its rights of a natural person. If their charters are pulled, the corporation dissolves and it is the equivalent of a death penalty. Greedy bastards hide behind corporate rights. Pull their charter and they're naked and helpless. Apparently courts do it to small, non-threatening corporations, so they need the political will to do it to the big boys. Yet, this option, a truly effective one, isn't even part of the conversation...yet. It should be since it is the only thing they will listen to. See www.polcad.com (org?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's www.poclad.org. My bad. Posted by: Koondog

Comments are closed-

A RETIRED AMERICAN CITIZEN
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 26, 2009 8:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SO WHERE'S MY COMMENT LOCATED AT ALTER NET?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protest?
Posted by: om7buss on Mar 26, 2009 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we can protest till we die, they don't care. we have to send people in goverment that have double citizenship, back to their country, many con-gress-man and seDators are jew-american; they have to make a decision is they serve US or israel?...www.henrybook.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ??? Posted by: gellero1

Comments are closed-

A THOUGHTFUL AMERICAN
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 27, 2009 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AGAIN= FROM A RETIRED AMERICAN= I SIGNED THE PETITION TO PROTEST AGAINST OUR GOVERNMENT SPENDING MORE MONEY. STOP AND THINK, WHY ARE WE TALKING BILLIONS AND TRILLIONS, WHY NOT TALK MILLIONS AND HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS, THIS BILLION GARBAGE WAS STARTED BY BUSH 2 MONTHS BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE. NOW YOUR PROTEST. I SIGNED UP, BUT I DONT PLAN ON TRAVELING 200 MILES TO STAND IN A UNHAPPY CROWD, THAT DOES'NT SEEM HEALTHY TO ME, BUT I DID SIGN THEIR PETITION YESTERDAY, BUT MY COMMENTS YESTERDAY WERE DELETED, BUT TODAY WITH PEOPLE THAT ARE'NT PREJUDISE, BUT ARE OPEN MINDED, YOU NOW SEE THAT BY COMMENTING IN THE MORNING OR DAYTIME IS BETTER. HAVE A NICE DAY, FROM MORE THAN ONE RETIRED AMERICAN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protests do work IF they are big enough
Posted by: nwcitizen on Mar 27, 2009 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree with some who have said that protests no longer work. This is true only because protests have not been big enough and have not lasted long enough. There are numerous examples of protests that have worked to change government policy in other countries. These have worked because enough people mobilized to get into the streets and STAY THERE until change happens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Protests, Who?
Posted by: bobtr900 on Mar 28, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article calls for protests.

America is now such a fascist nation, I'm not sure protests will, any longer, do any good. Although Obama did say we will have to pressure him. Mayhap, nothing short of a real revolution will do the job. Are Americans, "we the people', really up to that? Somehow I just don't see that happening. The ownership class owns America. "We the people have become just too complacent with our 42" flat screen TVs and our overflowing bowls of buttery popcorn and risk aversive nature. Not to mention those 800 FEMA prisons and the battle hardened US Army combat Brigade and the mercenaries like Blackwater just waiting for us.

On the other hand, If we get pushed hard enough and far enough, who knows. Burn a WalMart here, a mega church there, who knows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Contact your business's..tell them enough
Posted by: wallisp on Mar 28, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its so sad that Geithner and others can't address the methods the banks are using, against the American public and small business's today, until 2012. Increasing interest rates, manipulating credit scores, unfair fees, short billing cycles, and now, fees for online payments. Small business's are under attack also. The American citizens and small business, should not be bailing out these toxic bank executives and their policies. I seems like an all out war against the consumer! Why aren't companies, rallying aginst these financial monsters? Why are companies, to protect their customers, who shop with them, not in the news, rallying against this financial terrrorism? Come on business's, business organizations, organize, protest, and protect your business. If the banks cripple enough people, who the hell is going to shop with you........no one. Cripple the credit card banks before they cripple your business any further. Tell the credit card companies, back off, or cancel their card services. Citizens in tent cities won't buy your products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obamistas..........
Posted by: gellero1 on Mar 28, 2009 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Change, change, hope, hope. Ra ra sis boom ba.

Why did you all buy into this??

Youth?? inexperience, adulation, lemmings??

Please, explain it to me

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

AN AMERICAN PROTESTING AGAINST MONEY WASTE
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 28, 2009 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I SUGGEST WE BUY THE FORECLOSED HOUSES FROM THESE 3 BAILED OUT COMPANIES, BUT INSTEAD OF BUYING WITH MORE MONEY, WE SUBTRACT FROM THE DEBT EACH OF THESE COMPANIES OWES FROM BAILING THEM OUT AND IF THE BAILOUT WAS'NT A LOAN, THEN THESE 3 COMPANIES CAN JUST TURN THESE FORECLOSED HOMES OVER TO OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF WHICH EITHER WAY SHOULD BE SOLD TO AMERICANS ONLY WITH NO DOWN PAYMENT OR LEASED ONLY TO AMERICANS AND ALL THE MONEY GOING TO OUR FEDERAL RESERVE. AS FAR AS THE CD'S ARE CONCERNED, THE PRIVATE INVESTORS CAN BUY THEM. THIS WAY OUR GOVERNMENT WONT NEED TO WASTE A TRILLION DOLLARS ON THESE HOMES. HAVE A NICE DAY. MIKE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

One Party With 2 Right Wings To Rule Them All
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 29, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore once said that America had only one major political party- the Money Party and it had two right wings. I'm pretty sure he was, and is, right.

There was and is no such thing as a kinder and gentler America or a compassionate conservative or a reformed Rethugnican Party. Despite a generation of promising that it wasn't the robber baron party of the Gilded Age it has managed to walk down the exact same path of corruption and opposition to even the simplest of rights and protections for citizens and workers.

Despite the cries of Evangelicals the God of America is money. By the words of Jesus of Nazareth, one cannot serve two masters. That famous proclamation said that you would cling to one and despise the other. I think that is where we are today.

The pols have sold out to the monied interests and despise those who would interfere with making money by the selling of votes and later influence and access as lobbyists. How many potential former members of Congress failed Obama's vetting because of financial ties to those they have previously regulated or shared oversight over. Remember, these are supposed to be Democrats- people.

Then there are the southern DINO's- the modern traitors to the progressive cause just like the generations of DINOs from the south that held our country back on civil rights, unions, consumer protection and all the rest. The south's tradition is that of an oligarchy- not a democracy and it still has these tendencies. It's still poisoning America.

The progressives either have to purge the party of Republicans in drag (DINOS, Blue-Ticks, DLC, whatever) or leave and start a new progressive party. The southern DINOS have shown that they are willing to urinate and defecate in the public punchbowl to protect the status quo and the vested interests that have bought and paid for them. Yes, Senators Lincoln and Pryor, I am calling you out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Addendum Posted by: NoPCZone

Comments are closed-

Support this Solution
Posted by: TerryS on Mar 29, 2009 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's articles and organizing like this
that makes me happy to support Alternet.

And I'll certainly be at the protest.

Obviously, one little national protest
won't solve the problem, but it is
an excellent first step.

Temporarily nationalizing the failed banks,
breaking up the banks that are "too big to
fail", and increasing oversight are
exactly the solutions that need to be
done as soon as possible.

So far Obama has been in thrall of the
"financial experts" from Wall Street who got
us into this mess. But the great thing about
Obama is that he does listen to his supporters.
This protest, and many other more forms of
communication, will send the message to
Obama that this is the way to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ONE WAY TO END THE FED AND A LOT OF OTHER SHENANIGANS...
Posted by: HeatherC on Mar 30, 2009 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A federal tax revolt. Everybody pay your federal taxes to your home state. Corporate, personal income, federal excise, the whole nine yards. If it's a federal tax and it's collected locally, pay it to your home state. The IRS won't be able to do anything about it except make threats they know they can't carry out. There will be no money to prosecute or incarcerate us.

We can bring the federal government down on its knees by doing the one thing they think we don't have the guts to do. Lose your fear of government and do the one thing that will not only put everyone in Washington on notice, but will restore the respect that we once had. Democracy does not run on auto-pilot. It'll take more than protests, petitions and letters to your congressman to drive the message home.

Everybody-rich, poor, liberal, conservative, carnivore, vegan, boxers, briefs-pay your federal taxes to your home state. Put a little stimulus in your state and local economies for once, and the only recession will be the one in Washington. Shall we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ACTION!
Posted by: om7buss on Mar 31, 2009 12:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we have to move our checking accounts to small local banks, credit unions, etc...www.henrybook.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS